Functional Outcomes after Selective Clamping in Robot-Assisted Partial Nephrectomy
This study aimed to assess the risks and benefits of selective clamping in robot-assisted partial nephrectomy (RAPN). We retrospectively analyzed 372 patients who had undergone RAPN at our hospital between July 2010 and March 2021. After propensity score matching between the full and selective clamp...
Gespeichert in:
| Veröffentlicht in: | Journal of clinical medicine 2022-09, Vol.11 (19), p.5648 |
|---|---|
| Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , , , |
| Format: | Artikel |
| Sprache: | eng |
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
| Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
| container_end_page | |
|---|---|
| container_issue | 19 |
| container_start_page | 5648 |
| container_title | Journal of clinical medicine |
| container_volume | 11 |
| creator | Takahara, Kiyoshi Kusaka, Mamoru Nukaya, Takuhisa Takenaka, Masashi Zennami, Kenji Ichino, Manabu Sasaki, Hitomi Sumitomo, Makoto Shiroki, Ryoichi |
| description | This study aimed to assess the risks and benefits of selective clamping in robot-assisted partial nephrectomy (RAPN). We retrospectively analyzed 372 patients who had undergone RAPN at our hospital between July 2010 and March 2021. After propensity score matching between the full and selective clamping groups, perioperative outcomes and postoperative preservation ratio of the estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) were compared at 6 and 12 months of follow-up. After propensity score matching, we evaluated 47 patients from each group. While no significant differences were observed in surgical time, warm ischemia time, or incidence rates of all grades of complications between the two cohorts, the estimated blood loss (EBL) was significantly lower in the full clamping group than in the selective clamping group (30 vs. 60, p = 0.046). However, no significant intergroup differences were observed in the postoperative preservation ratio of eGFR at 6 or 12 months of follow-up (full clamping 94.0% vs. selective clamping 92.7%, p = 0.509, and full clamping 92.0% vs. selective clamping 91.6%, p = 0.476, respectively). Selective clamping resulted in higher EBL rates than did full clamping in RAPN. However, selective clamping provided no renal functional advantage over full clamping in our propensity-score-matched cohort. |
| doi_str_mv | 10.3390/jcm11195648 |
| format | Article |
| fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_9572118</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2725198781</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c316t-cdc498e389356b4d9c21dd82e5e5ef78f836cc9247232c3d1d53105c468a368b3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpdkVFLwzAQx4MoTuae_AIFXwSpNrm2SV-EMZwKw8nU55Cl6ZbRNjNJB_v2Zm7I9O7hDu53f47_IXSFkzuAIrlfyQZjXGR5yk7QBUkojRNgcHrU99DAuVUSgrGUYHqOepATgAyzCzQbd6302rSijqadl6ZRLhKVVzZ6V7UKo42KRrVo1rpdRLqNZmZufDx0TjuvyuhNWK_D7qtaL23ATbO9RGeVqJ0aHGoffY4fP0bP8WT69DIaTmIJOPexLGVaMAWsgCyfp2UhCS5LRlQWsqKsYpBLWZCUEiASSlxmgJNMpjkTkLM59NHDXnfdzRtVStV6K2q-troRdsuN0PzvpNVLvjAbXmSUYMyCwM1BwJqvTjnPG-2kqmvRKtM5TijJcMEowwG9_oeuTGeDaT9USoKfdEfd7ilpjXNWVb_H4ITv3sWP3gXfnliGnQ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2724262371</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Functional Outcomes after Selective Clamping in Robot-Assisted Partial Nephrectomy</title><source>MDPI - Multidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute</source><source>PubMed Central</source><source>EZB Electronic Journals Library</source><source>PubMed Central Open Access</source><creator>Takahara, Kiyoshi ; Kusaka, Mamoru ; Nukaya, Takuhisa ; Takenaka, Masashi ; Zennami, Kenji ; Ichino, Manabu ; Sasaki, Hitomi ; Sumitomo, Makoto ; Shiroki, Ryoichi</creator><creatorcontrib>Takahara, Kiyoshi ; Kusaka, Mamoru ; Nukaya, Takuhisa ; Takenaka, Masashi ; Zennami, Kenji ; Ichino, Manabu ; Sasaki, Hitomi ; Sumitomo, Makoto ; Shiroki, Ryoichi</creatorcontrib><description>This study aimed to assess the risks and benefits of selective clamping in robot-assisted partial nephrectomy (RAPN). We retrospectively analyzed 372 patients who had undergone RAPN at our hospital between July 2010 and March 2021. After propensity score matching between the full and selective clamping groups, perioperative outcomes and postoperative preservation ratio of the estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) were compared at 6 and 12 months of follow-up. After propensity score matching, we evaluated 47 patients from each group. While no significant differences were observed in surgical time, warm ischemia time, or incidence rates of all grades of complications between the two cohorts, the estimated blood loss (EBL) was significantly lower in the full clamping group than in the selective clamping group (30 vs. 60, p = 0.046). However, no significant intergroup differences were observed in the postoperative preservation ratio of eGFR at 6 or 12 months of follow-up (full clamping 94.0% vs. selective clamping 92.7%, p = 0.509, and full clamping 92.0% vs. selective clamping 91.6%, p = 0.476, respectively). Selective clamping resulted in higher EBL rates than did full clamping in RAPN. However, selective clamping provided no renal functional advantage over full clamping in our propensity-score-matched cohort.</description><identifier>ISSN: 2077-0383</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2077-0383</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.3390/jcm11195648</identifier><identifier>PMID: 36233518</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Basel: MDPI AG</publisher><subject>Body mass index ; Clinical medicine ; Ischemia ; Patients ; Sutures ; Tumors ; Veins & arteries</subject><ispartof>Journal of clinical medicine, 2022-09, Vol.11 (19), p.5648</ispartof><rights>2022 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><rights>2022 by the authors. 2022</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c316t-cdc498e389356b4d9c21dd82e5e5ef78f836cc9247232c3d1d53105c468a368b3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c316t-cdc498e389356b4d9c21dd82e5e5ef78f836cc9247232c3d1d53105c468a368b3</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-4766-2074</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9572118/pdf/$$EPDF$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9572118/$$EHTML$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,723,776,780,881,27901,27902,53766,53768</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Takahara, Kiyoshi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kusaka, Mamoru</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nukaya, Takuhisa</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Takenaka, Masashi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zennami, Kenji</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ichino, Manabu</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sasaki, Hitomi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sumitomo, Makoto</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Shiroki, Ryoichi</creatorcontrib><title>Functional Outcomes after Selective Clamping in Robot-Assisted Partial Nephrectomy</title><title>Journal of clinical medicine</title><description>This study aimed to assess the risks and benefits of selective clamping in robot-assisted partial nephrectomy (RAPN). We retrospectively analyzed 372 patients who had undergone RAPN at our hospital between July 2010 and March 2021. After propensity score matching between the full and selective clamping groups, perioperative outcomes and postoperative preservation ratio of the estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) were compared at 6 and 12 months of follow-up. After propensity score matching, we evaluated 47 patients from each group. While no significant differences were observed in surgical time, warm ischemia time, or incidence rates of all grades of complications between the two cohorts, the estimated blood loss (EBL) was significantly lower in the full clamping group than in the selective clamping group (30 vs. 60, p = 0.046). However, no significant intergroup differences were observed in the postoperative preservation ratio of eGFR at 6 or 12 months of follow-up (full clamping 94.0% vs. selective clamping 92.7%, p = 0.509, and full clamping 92.0% vs. selective clamping 91.6%, p = 0.476, respectively). Selective clamping resulted in higher EBL rates than did full clamping in RAPN. However, selective clamping provided no renal functional advantage over full clamping in our propensity-score-matched cohort.</description><subject>Body mass index</subject><subject>Clinical medicine</subject><subject>Ischemia</subject><subject>Patients</subject><subject>Sutures</subject><subject>Tumors</subject><subject>Veins & arteries</subject><issn>2077-0383</issn><issn>2077-0383</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2022</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><recordid>eNpdkVFLwzAQx4MoTuae_AIFXwSpNrm2SV-EMZwKw8nU55Cl6ZbRNjNJB_v2Zm7I9O7hDu53f47_IXSFkzuAIrlfyQZjXGR5yk7QBUkojRNgcHrU99DAuVUSgrGUYHqOepATgAyzCzQbd6302rSijqadl6ZRLhKVVzZ6V7UKo42KRrVo1rpdRLqNZmZufDx0TjuvyuhNWK_D7qtaL23ATbO9RGeVqJ0aHGoffY4fP0bP8WT69DIaTmIJOPexLGVaMAWsgCyfp2UhCS5LRlQWsqKsYpBLWZCUEiASSlxmgJNMpjkTkLM59NHDXnfdzRtVStV6K2q-troRdsuN0PzvpNVLvjAbXmSUYMyCwM1BwJqvTjnPG-2kqmvRKtM5TijJcMEowwG9_oeuTGeDaT9USoKfdEfd7ilpjXNWVb_H4ITv3sWP3gXfnliGnQ</recordid><startdate>20220925</startdate><enddate>20220925</enddate><creator>Takahara, Kiyoshi</creator><creator>Kusaka, Mamoru</creator><creator>Nukaya, Takuhisa</creator><creator>Takenaka, Masashi</creator><creator>Zennami, Kenji</creator><creator>Ichino, Manabu</creator><creator>Sasaki, Hitomi</creator><creator>Sumitomo, Makoto</creator><creator>Shiroki, Ryoichi</creator><general>MDPI AG</general><general>MDPI</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4766-2074</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20220925</creationdate><title>Functional Outcomes after Selective Clamping in Robot-Assisted Partial Nephrectomy</title><author>Takahara, Kiyoshi ; Kusaka, Mamoru ; Nukaya, Takuhisa ; Takenaka, Masashi ; Zennami, Kenji ; Ichino, Manabu ; Sasaki, Hitomi ; Sumitomo, Makoto ; Shiroki, Ryoichi</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c316t-cdc498e389356b4d9c21dd82e5e5ef78f836cc9247232c3d1d53105c468a368b3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2022</creationdate><topic>Body mass index</topic><topic>Clinical medicine</topic><topic>Ischemia</topic><topic>Patients</topic><topic>Sutures</topic><topic>Tumors</topic><topic>Veins & arteries</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Takahara, Kiyoshi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kusaka, Mamoru</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nukaya, Takuhisa</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Takenaka, Masashi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zennami, Kenji</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ichino, Manabu</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sasaki, Hitomi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sumitomo, Makoto</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Shiroki, Ryoichi</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Publicly Available Content Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>Journal of clinical medicine</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Takahara, Kiyoshi</au><au>Kusaka, Mamoru</au><au>Nukaya, Takuhisa</au><au>Takenaka, Masashi</au><au>Zennami, Kenji</au><au>Ichino, Manabu</au><au>Sasaki, Hitomi</au><au>Sumitomo, Makoto</au><au>Shiroki, Ryoichi</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Functional Outcomes after Selective Clamping in Robot-Assisted Partial Nephrectomy</atitle><jtitle>Journal of clinical medicine</jtitle><date>2022-09-25</date><risdate>2022</risdate><volume>11</volume><issue>19</issue><spage>5648</spage><pages>5648-</pages><issn>2077-0383</issn><eissn>2077-0383</eissn><abstract>This study aimed to assess the risks and benefits of selective clamping in robot-assisted partial nephrectomy (RAPN). We retrospectively analyzed 372 patients who had undergone RAPN at our hospital between July 2010 and March 2021. After propensity score matching between the full and selective clamping groups, perioperative outcomes and postoperative preservation ratio of the estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) were compared at 6 and 12 months of follow-up. After propensity score matching, we evaluated 47 patients from each group. While no significant differences were observed in surgical time, warm ischemia time, or incidence rates of all grades of complications between the two cohorts, the estimated blood loss (EBL) was significantly lower in the full clamping group than in the selective clamping group (30 vs. 60, p = 0.046). However, no significant intergroup differences were observed in the postoperative preservation ratio of eGFR at 6 or 12 months of follow-up (full clamping 94.0% vs. selective clamping 92.7%, p = 0.509, and full clamping 92.0% vs. selective clamping 91.6%, p = 0.476, respectively). Selective clamping resulted in higher EBL rates than did full clamping in RAPN. However, selective clamping provided no renal functional advantage over full clamping in our propensity-score-matched cohort.</abstract><cop>Basel</cop><pub>MDPI AG</pub><pmid>36233518</pmid><doi>10.3390/jcm11195648</doi><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4766-2074</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
| fulltext | fulltext |
| identifier | ISSN: 2077-0383 |
| ispartof | Journal of clinical medicine, 2022-09, Vol.11 (19), p.5648 |
| issn | 2077-0383 2077-0383 |
| language | eng |
| recordid | cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_9572118 |
| source | MDPI - Multidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute; PubMed Central; EZB Electronic Journals Library; PubMed Central Open Access |
| subjects | Body mass index Clinical medicine Ischemia Patients Sutures Tumors Veins & arteries |
| title | Functional Outcomes after Selective Clamping in Robot-Assisted Partial Nephrectomy |
| url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-01T08%3A10%3A32IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Functional%20Outcomes%20after%20Selective%20Clamping%20in%20Robot-Assisted%20Partial%20Nephrectomy&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20clinical%20medicine&rft.au=Takahara,%20Kiyoshi&rft.date=2022-09-25&rft.volume=11&rft.issue=19&rft.spage=5648&rft.pages=5648-&rft.issn=2077-0383&rft.eissn=2077-0383&rft_id=info:doi/10.3390/jcm11195648&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E2725198781%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2724262371&rft_id=info:pmid/36233518&rfr_iscdi=true |