Workplace Culture and Biomarkers of Health Risk
Workplace culture has been studied for impact on health risk; however, connections with robust biologic markers of health remain to be established. We examined associations between the work environment and urinary levels of catecholamines and their metabolites as biomarkers of sympathetic nervous sy...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | International journal of environmental research and public health 2022-09, Vol.19 (19), p.11920 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | |
---|---|
container_issue | 19 |
container_start_page | 11920 |
container_title | International journal of environmental research and public health |
container_volume | 19 |
creator | Shuck, Brad Hart, Joy L Walker, Kandi L Rai, Jayesh Srivastava, Shweta Srivastava, Sanjay Rai, Shesh Bhatnagar, Aruni Keith, Rachel J |
description | Workplace culture has been studied for impact on health risk; however, connections with robust biologic markers of health remain to be established. We examined associations between the work environment and urinary levels of catecholamines and their metabolites as biomarkers of sympathetic nervous system activity, indicative of stress. We recruited participants (n = 219; 2018-2019) from a cardiovascular risk cohort to investigate workplace culture, well-being, and stress. Participants completed seven questionnaires. Urine samples were used to measure catecholamines and their metabolites by LC/MS/MS. Pearson correlation and linear regression models were used after adjusting for demographics and creatinine. Participants reporting higher well-being had lower urinary levels of dopamine, serotonin, and 3-methoxytyramine. Participants reporting a more engaged and more positive workplace had lower levels of dopamine and 3-methoxytyramine. Reported workplace isolation was correlated with higher levels of dopamine and 3-methoxytyramine. Given correlations between catecholamines, we used 3-methoxytyramine for linear regression. In fully adjusted models, in environments with a more positive culture, levels of 3-methoxytyramine remained lower (β = -0.065 ± 0.025,
= 0.01) and indicated a positive association between workplace isolation and 3-methoxytyramine (β = 0.064 ± 0.030,
= 0.04). These findings are consistent with an important relationship between workplace environment and sympathetic nervous system activity. |
doi_str_mv | 10.3390/ijerph191911920 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_9565767</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2725193045</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c421t-524200860e0c28e9df10dd32e2a42939dbf0ad6bec33a0a162a9f60b209e1d573</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpdkU1Lw0AQhhdRbK2evUnAi5fY2Y9sshdBi1qhIIjicdkkE5s2zcbdRPDfm9IqtcxhBuaZl3dmCDmncM25gnG5QNfMqeqDKgYHZEilhFBIoIc79YCceL8A4ImQ6pgMuGScMsaHZPxu3bKpTIbBpKvazmFg6jy4K-3KuCU6H9gimKKp2nnwUvrlKTkqTOXxbJtH5O3h_nUyDWfPj0-T21mYCUbbMGKCASQSEDKWoMoLCnnOGTIjmOIqTwswuUwx49yAoZIZVUhIGSikeRTzEbnZ6DZdusI8w7p1ptKNK3tf39qaUv_v1OVcf9gvrSIZxXItcLUVcPazQ9_qVekzrCpTo-28ZjGLqOIgoh693EMXtnN1v96aEkzEIJOeGm-ozFnvHRZ_Zijo9TP03jP6iYvdHf743-vzH1lKhR0</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2724247068</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Workplace Culture and Biomarkers of Health Risk</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals</source><source>PubMed Central Open Access</source><source>MDPI - Multidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute</source><source>PubMed Central</source><source>Free Full-Text Journals in Chemistry</source><creator>Shuck, Brad ; Hart, Joy L ; Walker, Kandi L ; Rai, Jayesh ; Srivastava, Shweta ; Srivastava, Sanjay ; Rai, Shesh ; Bhatnagar, Aruni ; Keith, Rachel J</creator><creatorcontrib>Shuck, Brad ; Hart, Joy L ; Walker, Kandi L ; Rai, Jayesh ; Srivastava, Shweta ; Srivastava, Sanjay ; Rai, Shesh ; Bhatnagar, Aruni ; Keith, Rachel J</creatorcontrib><description>Workplace culture has been studied for impact on health risk; however, connections with robust biologic markers of health remain to be established. We examined associations between the work environment and urinary levels of catecholamines and their metabolites as biomarkers of sympathetic nervous system activity, indicative of stress. We recruited participants (n = 219; 2018-2019) from a cardiovascular risk cohort to investigate workplace culture, well-being, and stress. Participants completed seven questionnaires. Urine samples were used to measure catecholamines and their metabolites by LC/MS/MS. Pearson correlation and linear regression models were used after adjusting for demographics and creatinine. Participants reporting higher well-being had lower urinary levels of dopamine, serotonin, and 3-methoxytyramine. Participants reporting a more engaged and more positive workplace had lower levels of dopamine and 3-methoxytyramine. Reported workplace isolation was correlated with higher levels of dopamine and 3-methoxytyramine. Given correlations between catecholamines, we used 3-methoxytyramine for linear regression. In fully adjusted models, in environments with a more positive culture, levels of 3-methoxytyramine remained lower (β = -0.065 ± 0.025,
= 0.01) and indicated a positive association between workplace isolation and 3-methoxytyramine (β = 0.064 ± 0.030,
= 0.04). These findings are consistent with an important relationship between workplace environment and sympathetic nervous system activity.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1660-4601</identifier><identifier>ISSN: 1661-7827</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1660-4601</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.3390/ijerph191911920</identifier><identifier>PMID: 36231223</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Switzerland: MDPI AG</publisher><subject>Biomarkers ; Biomarkers - metabolism ; Blood pressure ; Cardiovascular disease ; Cardiovascular diseases ; Catecholamines ; Chronic illnesses ; Consent ; Corporate culture ; Creatinine ; Diabetes ; Diabetic neuropathy ; Dopamine ; Dopamine - analogs & derivatives ; Dopamine - metabolism ; Employee involvement ; Employment ; Health risk assessment ; Health risks ; Humans ; Metabolites ; Nervous system ; Occupational health ; Personal health ; Questionnaires ; Regression analysis ; Serotonin ; Stress ; Sympathetic nervous system ; Tandem Mass Spectrometry ; Well being ; Wellness programs ; Work environment ; Working conditions ; Workplace</subject><ispartof>International journal of environmental research and public health, 2022-09, Vol.19 (19), p.11920</ispartof><rights>2022 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><rights>2022 by the authors. 2022</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c421t-524200860e0c28e9df10dd32e2a42939dbf0ad6bec33a0a162a9f60b209e1d573</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c421t-524200860e0c28e9df10dd32e2a42939dbf0ad6bec33a0a162a9f60b209e1d573</cites><orcidid>0000-0003-3220-2638 ; 0000-0003-1719-588X ; 0000-0002-8377-353X</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9565767/pdf/$$EPDF$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9565767/$$EHTML$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,727,780,784,885,27924,27925,53791,53793</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36231223$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Shuck, Brad</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hart, Joy L</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Walker, Kandi L</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rai, Jayesh</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Srivastava, Shweta</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Srivastava, Sanjay</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rai, Shesh</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bhatnagar, Aruni</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Keith, Rachel J</creatorcontrib><title>Workplace Culture and Biomarkers of Health Risk</title><title>International journal of environmental research and public health</title><addtitle>Int J Environ Res Public Health</addtitle><description>Workplace culture has been studied for impact on health risk; however, connections with robust biologic markers of health remain to be established. We examined associations between the work environment and urinary levels of catecholamines and their metabolites as biomarkers of sympathetic nervous system activity, indicative of stress. We recruited participants (n = 219; 2018-2019) from a cardiovascular risk cohort to investigate workplace culture, well-being, and stress. Participants completed seven questionnaires. Urine samples were used to measure catecholamines and their metabolites by LC/MS/MS. Pearson correlation and linear regression models were used after adjusting for demographics and creatinine. Participants reporting higher well-being had lower urinary levels of dopamine, serotonin, and 3-methoxytyramine. Participants reporting a more engaged and more positive workplace had lower levels of dopamine and 3-methoxytyramine. Reported workplace isolation was correlated with higher levels of dopamine and 3-methoxytyramine. Given correlations between catecholamines, we used 3-methoxytyramine for linear regression. In fully adjusted models, in environments with a more positive culture, levels of 3-methoxytyramine remained lower (β = -0.065 ± 0.025,
= 0.01) and indicated a positive association between workplace isolation and 3-methoxytyramine (β = 0.064 ± 0.030,
= 0.04). These findings are consistent with an important relationship between workplace environment and sympathetic nervous system activity.</description><subject>Biomarkers</subject><subject>Biomarkers - metabolism</subject><subject>Blood pressure</subject><subject>Cardiovascular disease</subject><subject>Cardiovascular diseases</subject><subject>Catecholamines</subject><subject>Chronic illnesses</subject><subject>Consent</subject><subject>Corporate culture</subject><subject>Creatinine</subject><subject>Diabetes</subject><subject>Diabetic neuropathy</subject><subject>Dopamine</subject><subject>Dopamine - analogs & derivatives</subject><subject>Dopamine - metabolism</subject><subject>Employee involvement</subject><subject>Employment</subject><subject>Health risk assessment</subject><subject>Health risks</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Metabolites</subject><subject>Nervous system</subject><subject>Occupational health</subject><subject>Personal health</subject><subject>Questionnaires</subject><subject>Regression analysis</subject><subject>Serotonin</subject><subject>Stress</subject><subject>Sympathetic nervous system</subject><subject>Tandem Mass Spectrometry</subject><subject>Well being</subject><subject>Wellness programs</subject><subject>Work environment</subject><subject>Working conditions</subject><subject>Workplace</subject><issn>1660-4601</issn><issn>1661-7827</issn><issn>1660-4601</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2022</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><recordid>eNpdkU1Lw0AQhhdRbK2evUnAi5fY2Y9sshdBi1qhIIjicdkkE5s2zcbdRPDfm9IqtcxhBuaZl3dmCDmncM25gnG5QNfMqeqDKgYHZEilhFBIoIc79YCceL8A4ImQ6pgMuGScMsaHZPxu3bKpTIbBpKvazmFg6jy4K-3KuCU6H9gimKKp2nnwUvrlKTkqTOXxbJtH5O3h_nUyDWfPj0-T21mYCUbbMGKCASQSEDKWoMoLCnnOGTIjmOIqTwswuUwx49yAoZIZVUhIGSikeRTzEbnZ6DZdusI8w7p1ptKNK3tf39qaUv_v1OVcf9gvrSIZxXItcLUVcPazQ9_qVekzrCpTo-28ZjGLqOIgoh693EMXtnN1v96aEkzEIJOeGm-ozFnvHRZ_Zijo9TP03jP6iYvdHf743-vzH1lKhR0</recordid><startdate>20220921</startdate><enddate>20220921</enddate><creator>Shuck, Brad</creator><creator>Hart, Joy L</creator><creator>Walker, Kandi L</creator><creator>Rai, Jayesh</creator><creator>Srivastava, Shweta</creator><creator>Srivastava, Sanjay</creator><creator>Rai, Shesh</creator><creator>Bhatnagar, Aruni</creator><creator>Keith, Rachel J</creator><general>MDPI AG</general><general>MDPI</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>8C1</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3220-2638</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1719-588X</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8377-353X</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20220921</creationdate><title>Workplace Culture and Biomarkers of Health Risk</title><author>Shuck, Brad ; Hart, Joy L ; Walker, Kandi L ; Rai, Jayesh ; Srivastava, Shweta ; Srivastava, Sanjay ; Rai, Shesh ; Bhatnagar, Aruni ; Keith, Rachel J</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c421t-524200860e0c28e9df10dd32e2a42939dbf0ad6bec33a0a162a9f60b209e1d573</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2022</creationdate><topic>Biomarkers</topic><topic>Biomarkers - metabolism</topic><topic>Blood pressure</topic><topic>Cardiovascular disease</topic><topic>Cardiovascular diseases</topic><topic>Catecholamines</topic><topic>Chronic illnesses</topic><topic>Consent</topic><topic>Corporate culture</topic><topic>Creatinine</topic><topic>Diabetes</topic><topic>Diabetic neuropathy</topic><topic>Dopamine</topic><topic>Dopamine - analogs & derivatives</topic><topic>Dopamine - metabolism</topic><topic>Employee involvement</topic><topic>Employment</topic><topic>Health risk assessment</topic><topic>Health risks</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Metabolites</topic><topic>Nervous system</topic><topic>Occupational health</topic><topic>Personal health</topic><topic>Questionnaires</topic><topic>Regression analysis</topic><topic>Serotonin</topic><topic>Stress</topic><topic>Sympathetic nervous system</topic><topic>Tandem Mass Spectrometry</topic><topic>Well being</topic><topic>Wellness programs</topic><topic>Work environment</topic><topic>Working conditions</topic><topic>Workplace</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Shuck, Brad</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hart, Joy L</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Walker, Kandi L</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rai, Jayesh</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Srivastava, Shweta</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Srivastava, Sanjay</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rai, Shesh</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bhatnagar, Aruni</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Keith, Rachel J</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Public Health Database</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Publicly Available Content Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>International journal of environmental research and public health</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Shuck, Brad</au><au>Hart, Joy L</au><au>Walker, Kandi L</au><au>Rai, Jayesh</au><au>Srivastava, Shweta</au><au>Srivastava, Sanjay</au><au>Rai, Shesh</au><au>Bhatnagar, Aruni</au><au>Keith, Rachel J</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Workplace Culture and Biomarkers of Health Risk</atitle><jtitle>International journal of environmental research and public health</jtitle><addtitle>Int J Environ Res Public Health</addtitle><date>2022-09-21</date><risdate>2022</risdate><volume>19</volume><issue>19</issue><spage>11920</spage><pages>11920-</pages><issn>1660-4601</issn><issn>1661-7827</issn><eissn>1660-4601</eissn><abstract>Workplace culture has been studied for impact on health risk; however, connections with robust biologic markers of health remain to be established. We examined associations between the work environment and urinary levels of catecholamines and their metabolites as biomarkers of sympathetic nervous system activity, indicative of stress. We recruited participants (n = 219; 2018-2019) from a cardiovascular risk cohort to investigate workplace culture, well-being, and stress. Participants completed seven questionnaires. Urine samples were used to measure catecholamines and their metabolites by LC/MS/MS. Pearson correlation and linear regression models were used after adjusting for demographics and creatinine. Participants reporting higher well-being had lower urinary levels of dopamine, serotonin, and 3-methoxytyramine. Participants reporting a more engaged and more positive workplace had lower levels of dopamine and 3-methoxytyramine. Reported workplace isolation was correlated with higher levels of dopamine and 3-methoxytyramine. Given correlations between catecholamines, we used 3-methoxytyramine for linear regression. In fully adjusted models, in environments with a more positive culture, levels of 3-methoxytyramine remained lower (β = -0.065 ± 0.025,
= 0.01) and indicated a positive association between workplace isolation and 3-methoxytyramine (β = 0.064 ± 0.030,
= 0.04). These findings are consistent with an important relationship between workplace environment and sympathetic nervous system activity.</abstract><cop>Switzerland</cop><pub>MDPI AG</pub><pmid>36231223</pmid><doi>10.3390/ijerph191911920</doi><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3220-2638</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1719-588X</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8377-353X</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1660-4601 |
ispartof | International journal of environmental research and public health, 2022-09, Vol.19 (19), p.11920 |
issn | 1660-4601 1661-7827 1660-4601 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_9565767 |
source | MEDLINE; Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals; PubMed Central Open Access; MDPI - Multidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute; PubMed Central; Free Full-Text Journals in Chemistry |
subjects | Biomarkers Biomarkers - metabolism Blood pressure Cardiovascular disease Cardiovascular diseases Catecholamines Chronic illnesses Consent Corporate culture Creatinine Diabetes Diabetic neuropathy Dopamine Dopamine - analogs & derivatives Dopamine - metabolism Employee involvement Employment Health risk assessment Health risks Humans Metabolites Nervous system Occupational health Personal health Questionnaires Regression analysis Serotonin Stress Sympathetic nervous system Tandem Mass Spectrometry Well being Wellness programs Work environment Working conditions Workplace |
title | Workplace Culture and Biomarkers of Health Risk |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-04T13%3A35%3A29IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Workplace%20Culture%20and%20Biomarkers%20of%20Health%20Risk&rft.jtitle=International%20journal%20of%20environmental%20research%20and%20public%20health&rft.au=Shuck,%20Brad&rft.date=2022-09-21&rft.volume=19&rft.issue=19&rft.spage=11920&rft.pages=11920-&rft.issn=1660-4601&rft.eissn=1660-4601&rft_id=info:doi/10.3390/ijerph191911920&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E2725193045%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2724247068&rft_id=info:pmid/36231223&rfr_iscdi=true |