Workplace Culture and Biomarkers of Health Risk

Workplace culture has been studied for impact on health risk; however, connections with robust biologic markers of health remain to be established. We examined associations between the work environment and urinary levels of catecholamines and their metabolites as biomarkers of sympathetic nervous sy...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:International journal of environmental research and public health 2022-09, Vol.19 (19), p.11920
Hauptverfasser: Shuck, Brad, Hart, Joy L, Walker, Kandi L, Rai, Jayesh, Srivastava, Shweta, Srivastava, Sanjay, Rai, Shesh, Bhatnagar, Aruni, Keith, Rachel J
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page
container_issue 19
container_start_page 11920
container_title International journal of environmental research and public health
container_volume 19
creator Shuck, Brad
Hart, Joy L
Walker, Kandi L
Rai, Jayesh
Srivastava, Shweta
Srivastava, Sanjay
Rai, Shesh
Bhatnagar, Aruni
Keith, Rachel J
description Workplace culture has been studied for impact on health risk; however, connections with robust biologic markers of health remain to be established. We examined associations between the work environment and urinary levels of catecholamines and their metabolites as biomarkers of sympathetic nervous system activity, indicative of stress. We recruited participants (n = 219; 2018-2019) from a cardiovascular risk cohort to investigate workplace culture, well-being, and stress. Participants completed seven questionnaires. Urine samples were used to measure catecholamines and their metabolites by LC/MS/MS. Pearson correlation and linear regression models were used after adjusting for demographics and creatinine. Participants reporting higher well-being had lower urinary levels of dopamine, serotonin, and 3-methoxytyramine. Participants reporting a more engaged and more positive workplace had lower levels of dopamine and 3-methoxytyramine. Reported workplace isolation was correlated with higher levels of dopamine and 3-methoxytyramine. Given correlations between catecholamines, we used 3-methoxytyramine for linear regression. In fully adjusted models, in environments with a more positive culture, levels of 3-methoxytyramine remained lower (β = -0.065 ± 0.025, = 0.01) and indicated a positive association between workplace isolation and 3-methoxytyramine (β = 0.064 ± 0.030, = 0.04). These findings are consistent with an important relationship between workplace environment and sympathetic nervous system activity.
doi_str_mv 10.3390/ijerph191911920
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_9565767</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2725193045</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c421t-524200860e0c28e9df10dd32e2a42939dbf0ad6bec33a0a162a9f60b209e1d573</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpdkU1Lw0AQhhdRbK2evUnAi5fY2Y9sshdBi1qhIIjicdkkE5s2zcbdRPDfm9IqtcxhBuaZl3dmCDmncM25gnG5QNfMqeqDKgYHZEilhFBIoIc79YCceL8A4ImQ6pgMuGScMsaHZPxu3bKpTIbBpKvazmFg6jy4K-3KuCU6H9gimKKp2nnwUvrlKTkqTOXxbJtH5O3h_nUyDWfPj0-T21mYCUbbMGKCASQSEDKWoMoLCnnOGTIjmOIqTwswuUwx49yAoZIZVUhIGSikeRTzEbnZ6DZdusI8w7p1ptKNK3tf39qaUv_v1OVcf9gvrSIZxXItcLUVcPazQ9_qVekzrCpTo-28ZjGLqOIgoh693EMXtnN1v96aEkzEIJOeGm-ozFnvHRZ_Zijo9TP03jP6iYvdHf743-vzH1lKhR0</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2724247068</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Workplace Culture and Biomarkers of Health Risk</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals</source><source>PubMed Central Open Access</source><source>MDPI - Multidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute</source><source>PubMed Central</source><source>Free Full-Text Journals in Chemistry</source><creator>Shuck, Brad ; Hart, Joy L ; Walker, Kandi L ; Rai, Jayesh ; Srivastava, Shweta ; Srivastava, Sanjay ; Rai, Shesh ; Bhatnagar, Aruni ; Keith, Rachel J</creator><creatorcontrib>Shuck, Brad ; Hart, Joy L ; Walker, Kandi L ; Rai, Jayesh ; Srivastava, Shweta ; Srivastava, Sanjay ; Rai, Shesh ; Bhatnagar, Aruni ; Keith, Rachel J</creatorcontrib><description>Workplace culture has been studied for impact on health risk; however, connections with robust biologic markers of health remain to be established. We examined associations between the work environment and urinary levels of catecholamines and their metabolites as biomarkers of sympathetic nervous system activity, indicative of stress. We recruited participants (n = 219; 2018-2019) from a cardiovascular risk cohort to investigate workplace culture, well-being, and stress. Participants completed seven questionnaires. Urine samples were used to measure catecholamines and their metabolites by LC/MS/MS. Pearson correlation and linear regression models were used after adjusting for demographics and creatinine. Participants reporting higher well-being had lower urinary levels of dopamine, serotonin, and 3-methoxytyramine. Participants reporting a more engaged and more positive workplace had lower levels of dopamine and 3-methoxytyramine. Reported workplace isolation was correlated with higher levels of dopamine and 3-methoxytyramine. Given correlations between catecholamines, we used 3-methoxytyramine for linear regression. In fully adjusted models, in environments with a more positive culture, levels of 3-methoxytyramine remained lower (β = -0.065 ± 0.025, = 0.01) and indicated a positive association between workplace isolation and 3-methoxytyramine (β = 0.064 ± 0.030, = 0.04). These findings are consistent with an important relationship between workplace environment and sympathetic nervous system activity.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1660-4601</identifier><identifier>ISSN: 1661-7827</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1660-4601</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.3390/ijerph191911920</identifier><identifier>PMID: 36231223</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Switzerland: MDPI AG</publisher><subject>Biomarkers ; Biomarkers - metabolism ; Blood pressure ; Cardiovascular disease ; Cardiovascular diseases ; Catecholamines ; Chronic illnesses ; Consent ; Corporate culture ; Creatinine ; Diabetes ; Diabetic neuropathy ; Dopamine ; Dopamine - analogs &amp; derivatives ; Dopamine - metabolism ; Employee involvement ; Employment ; Health risk assessment ; Health risks ; Humans ; Metabolites ; Nervous system ; Occupational health ; Personal health ; Questionnaires ; Regression analysis ; Serotonin ; Stress ; Sympathetic nervous system ; Tandem Mass Spectrometry ; Well being ; Wellness programs ; Work environment ; Working conditions ; Workplace</subject><ispartof>International journal of environmental research and public health, 2022-09, Vol.19 (19), p.11920</ispartof><rights>2022 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><rights>2022 by the authors. 2022</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c421t-524200860e0c28e9df10dd32e2a42939dbf0ad6bec33a0a162a9f60b209e1d573</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c421t-524200860e0c28e9df10dd32e2a42939dbf0ad6bec33a0a162a9f60b209e1d573</cites><orcidid>0000-0003-3220-2638 ; 0000-0003-1719-588X ; 0000-0002-8377-353X</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9565767/pdf/$$EPDF$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9565767/$$EHTML$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,727,780,784,885,27924,27925,53791,53793</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36231223$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Shuck, Brad</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hart, Joy L</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Walker, Kandi L</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rai, Jayesh</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Srivastava, Shweta</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Srivastava, Sanjay</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rai, Shesh</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bhatnagar, Aruni</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Keith, Rachel J</creatorcontrib><title>Workplace Culture and Biomarkers of Health Risk</title><title>International journal of environmental research and public health</title><addtitle>Int J Environ Res Public Health</addtitle><description>Workplace culture has been studied for impact on health risk; however, connections with robust biologic markers of health remain to be established. We examined associations between the work environment and urinary levels of catecholamines and their metabolites as biomarkers of sympathetic nervous system activity, indicative of stress. We recruited participants (n = 219; 2018-2019) from a cardiovascular risk cohort to investigate workplace culture, well-being, and stress. Participants completed seven questionnaires. Urine samples were used to measure catecholamines and their metabolites by LC/MS/MS. Pearson correlation and linear regression models were used after adjusting for demographics and creatinine. Participants reporting higher well-being had lower urinary levels of dopamine, serotonin, and 3-methoxytyramine. Participants reporting a more engaged and more positive workplace had lower levels of dopamine and 3-methoxytyramine. Reported workplace isolation was correlated with higher levels of dopamine and 3-methoxytyramine. Given correlations between catecholamines, we used 3-methoxytyramine for linear regression. In fully adjusted models, in environments with a more positive culture, levels of 3-methoxytyramine remained lower (β = -0.065 ± 0.025, = 0.01) and indicated a positive association between workplace isolation and 3-methoxytyramine (β = 0.064 ± 0.030, = 0.04). These findings are consistent with an important relationship between workplace environment and sympathetic nervous system activity.</description><subject>Biomarkers</subject><subject>Biomarkers - metabolism</subject><subject>Blood pressure</subject><subject>Cardiovascular disease</subject><subject>Cardiovascular diseases</subject><subject>Catecholamines</subject><subject>Chronic illnesses</subject><subject>Consent</subject><subject>Corporate culture</subject><subject>Creatinine</subject><subject>Diabetes</subject><subject>Diabetic neuropathy</subject><subject>Dopamine</subject><subject>Dopamine - analogs &amp; derivatives</subject><subject>Dopamine - metabolism</subject><subject>Employee involvement</subject><subject>Employment</subject><subject>Health risk assessment</subject><subject>Health risks</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Metabolites</subject><subject>Nervous system</subject><subject>Occupational health</subject><subject>Personal health</subject><subject>Questionnaires</subject><subject>Regression analysis</subject><subject>Serotonin</subject><subject>Stress</subject><subject>Sympathetic nervous system</subject><subject>Tandem Mass Spectrometry</subject><subject>Well being</subject><subject>Wellness programs</subject><subject>Work environment</subject><subject>Working conditions</subject><subject>Workplace</subject><issn>1660-4601</issn><issn>1661-7827</issn><issn>1660-4601</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2022</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><recordid>eNpdkU1Lw0AQhhdRbK2evUnAi5fY2Y9sshdBi1qhIIjicdkkE5s2zcbdRPDfm9IqtcxhBuaZl3dmCDmncM25gnG5QNfMqeqDKgYHZEilhFBIoIc79YCceL8A4ImQ6pgMuGScMsaHZPxu3bKpTIbBpKvazmFg6jy4K-3KuCU6H9gimKKp2nnwUvrlKTkqTOXxbJtH5O3h_nUyDWfPj0-T21mYCUbbMGKCASQSEDKWoMoLCnnOGTIjmOIqTwswuUwx49yAoZIZVUhIGSikeRTzEbnZ6DZdusI8w7p1ptKNK3tf39qaUv_v1OVcf9gvrSIZxXItcLUVcPazQ9_qVekzrCpTo-28ZjGLqOIgoh693EMXtnN1v96aEkzEIJOeGm-ozFnvHRZ_Zijo9TP03jP6iYvdHf743-vzH1lKhR0</recordid><startdate>20220921</startdate><enddate>20220921</enddate><creator>Shuck, Brad</creator><creator>Hart, Joy L</creator><creator>Walker, Kandi L</creator><creator>Rai, Jayesh</creator><creator>Srivastava, Shweta</creator><creator>Srivastava, Sanjay</creator><creator>Rai, Shesh</creator><creator>Bhatnagar, Aruni</creator><creator>Keith, Rachel J</creator><general>MDPI AG</general><general>MDPI</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>8C1</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3220-2638</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1719-588X</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8377-353X</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20220921</creationdate><title>Workplace Culture and Biomarkers of Health Risk</title><author>Shuck, Brad ; Hart, Joy L ; Walker, Kandi L ; Rai, Jayesh ; Srivastava, Shweta ; Srivastava, Sanjay ; Rai, Shesh ; Bhatnagar, Aruni ; Keith, Rachel J</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c421t-524200860e0c28e9df10dd32e2a42939dbf0ad6bec33a0a162a9f60b209e1d573</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2022</creationdate><topic>Biomarkers</topic><topic>Biomarkers - metabolism</topic><topic>Blood pressure</topic><topic>Cardiovascular disease</topic><topic>Cardiovascular diseases</topic><topic>Catecholamines</topic><topic>Chronic illnesses</topic><topic>Consent</topic><topic>Corporate culture</topic><topic>Creatinine</topic><topic>Diabetes</topic><topic>Diabetic neuropathy</topic><topic>Dopamine</topic><topic>Dopamine - analogs &amp; derivatives</topic><topic>Dopamine - metabolism</topic><topic>Employee involvement</topic><topic>Employment</topic><topic>Health risk assessment</topic><topic>Health risks</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Metabolites</topic><topic>Nervous system</topic><topic>Occupational health</topic><topic>Personal health</topic><topic>Questionnaires</topic><topic>Regression analysis</topic><topic>Serotonin</topic><topic>Stress</topic><topic>Sympathetic nervous system</topic><topic>Tandem Mass Spectrometry</topic><topic>Well being</topic><topic>Wellness programs</topic><topic>Work environment</topic><topic>Working conditions</topic><topic>Workplace</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Shuck, Brad</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hart, Joy L</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Walker, Kandi L</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rai, Jayesh</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Srivastava, Shweta</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Srivastava, Sanjay</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rai, Shesh</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bhatnagar, Aruni</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Keith, Rachel J</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Public Health Database</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Publicly Available Content Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>International journal of environmental research and public health</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Shuck, Brad</au><au>Hart, Joy L</au><au>Walker, Kandi L</au><au>Rai, Jayesh</au><au>Srivastava, Shweta</au><au>Srivastava, Sanjay</au><au>Rai, Shesh</au><au>Bhatnagar, Aruni</au><au>Keith, Rachel J</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Workplace Culture and Biomarkers of Health Risk</atitle><jtitle>International journal of environmental research and public health</jtitle><addtitle>Int J Environ Res Public Health</addtitle><date>2022-09-21</date><risdate>2022</risdate><volume>19</volume><issue>19</issue><spage>11920</spage><pages>11920-</pages><issn>1660-4601</issn><issn>1661-7827</issn><eissn>1660-4601</eissn><abstract>Workplace culture has been studied for impact on health risk; however, connections with robust biologic markers of health remain to be established. We examined associations between the work environment and urinary levels of catecholamines and their metabolites as biomarkers of sympathetic nervous system activity, indicative of stress. We recruited participants (n = 219; 2018-2019) from a cardiovascular risk cohort to investigate workplace culture, well-being, and stress. Participants completed seven questionnaires. Urine samples were used to measure catecholamines and their metabolites by LC/MS/MS. Pearson correlation and linear regression models were used after adjusting for demographics and creatinine. Participants reporting higher well-being had lower urinary levels of dopamine, serotonin, and 3-methoxytyramine. Participants reporting a more engaged and more positive workplace had lower levels of dopamine and 3-methoxytyramine. Reported workplace isolation was correlated with higher levels of dopamine and 3-methoxytyramine. Given correlations between catecholamines, we used 3-methoxytyramine for linear regression. In fully adjusted models, in environments with a more positive culture, levels of 3-methoxytyramine remained lower (β = -0.065 ± 0.025, = 0.01) and indicated a positive association between workplace isolation and 3-methoxytyramine (β = 0.064 ± 0.030, = 0.04). These findings are consistent with an important relationship between workplace environment and sympathetic nervous system activity.</abstract><cop>Switzerland</cop><pub>MDPI AG</pub><pmid>36231223</pmid><doi>10.3390/ijerph191911920</doi><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3220-2638</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1719-588X</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8377-353X</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1660-4601
ispartof International journal of environmental research and public health, 2022-09, Vol.19 (19), p.11920
issn 1660-4601
1661-7827
1660-4601
language eng
recordid cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_9565767
source MEDLINE; Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals; PubMed Central Open Access; MDPI - Multidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute; PubMed Central; Free Full-Text Journals in Chemistry
subjects Biomarkers
Biomarkers - metabolism
Blood pressure
Cardiovascular disease
Cardiovascular diseases
Catecholamines
Chronic illnesses
Consent
Corporate culture
Creatinine
Diabetes
Diabetic neuropathy
Dopamine
Dopamine - analogs & derivatives
Dopamine - metabolism
Employee involvement
Employment
Health risk assessment
Health risks
Humans
Metabolites
Nervous system
Occupational health
Personal health
Questionnaires
Regression analysis
Serotonin
Stress
Sympathetic nervous system
Tandem Mass Spectrometry
Well being
Wellness programs
Work environment
Working conditions
Workplace
title Workplace Culture and Biomarkers of Health Risk
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-04T13%3A35%3A29IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Workplace%20Culture%20and%20Biomarkers%20of%20Health%20Risk&rft.jtitle=International%20journal%20of%20environmental%20research%20and%20public%20health&rft.au=Shuck,%20Brad&rft.date=2022-09-21&rft.volume=19&rft.issue=19&rft.spage=11920&rft.pages=11920-&rft.issn=1660-4601&rft.eissn=1660-4601&rft_id=info:doi/10.3390/ijerph191911920&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E2725193045%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2724247068&rft_id=info:pmid/36231223&rfr_iscdi=true