The Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, Fifth Edition, Alternative Model Conceptualization of Borderline Personality Disorder: A Review of the Evidence
In the 10 years following the publishing of the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, Fifth Edition (DSM-5), studies have accumulated testing the validity and utility of the alternative model for personality disorders (AMPD) in the context of borderline personality disorder (BPD). I...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Personality disorders 2022-07, Vol.13 (4), p.402-406 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 406 |
---|---|
container_issue | 4 |
container_start_page | 402 |
container_title | Personality disorders |
container_volume | 13 |
creator | Vanwoerden, Salome Stepp, Stephanie D. |
description | In the 10 years following the publishing of the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, Fifth Edition (DSM-5), studies have accumulated testing the validity and utility of the alternative model for personality disorders (AMPD) in the context of borderline personality disorder (BPD). In this article, we review the studies that have tested how well the AMPD conceptualization of BPD captures the traditional (DSM-5, Section II) conceptualization of BPD. Although we note that studies that measure the full conceptualization of the AMPD-BPD are limited compared with studies focusing on a single aspect of the AMPD, studies reviewed suggest that the AMPD conceptualization of BPD largely overlaps with Section II, is associated with a similar range of external constructs, and can be measured with similar levels of interrater reliability. This evidence is promising in terms of the goal of the AMPD developers to not lose relevant and clinically meaningful information associated with traditional conceptualizations of BPD. However, further applied research is needed to understand how the AMPD may improve upon our existing categorical conceptualization of BPD. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1037/per0000563 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_9558039</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2684632868</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-a442t-5984caf42257ba2f6d232c6235d7629f19487436e5fd6233965c0e09eba9f3273</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpdkluPEyEUgImXuBd98QcYkn0xulWG2ww-mNRuV0220eia-EbozJktmymMwNTUn-SvlNmu9cLLAc7Hl8MBhB4X5EVBWPmyh0DyEJLdQYeF4mpCS8ruoqOCM1YpoeTXe_tEIQ7QUYzXhEglePkAHTBRVmXByCH6ebkCfGbNlfMx2Rob1-DPySQ7rkyHF8YNOfgWL8ClPDuz0YcGQjzF57ZNKzxvbLLeneJplyC4fHQDeOEb6PDMuxr6lAX2hxmh0fPm5nhnHeCPWeNdzqbt3vsKT_En2Fj4PsIpVzff2Aay6CG635ouwqPbeIy-nM8vZ-8mFx_evp9NLyaGc5omQlW8Ni2nVJRLQ1vZUEZrSZloSklVm5tSlZxJEG2Td5mSoiZAFCyNahkt2TF6vfP2w3INTZ3vHUyn-2DXJmy1N1b_m3F2pa_8RishKsJUFjy9FQT_bYCY9NrGGrrOOPBD1FRWgjDJGc_oyX_otR9yE7sbiktGK1ll6tmOqoOPMUC7L6YgevwP-s9_yPCTv8vfo7_fPAPPd4Dpje7jtjYhv3UHsR5CyFcaZbpgmmtOKPsFNurAag</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2684632868</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>The Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, Fifth Edition, Alternative Model Conceptualization of Borderline Personality Disorder: A Review of the Evidence</title><source>APA PsycARTICLES</source><source>MEDLINE</source><creator>Vanwoerden, Salome ; Stepp, Stephanie D.</creator><contributor>Miller, Joshua D ; Sharp, Carla</contributor><creatorcontrib>Vanwoerden, Salome ; Stepp, Stephanie D. ; Miller, Joshua D ; Sharp, Carla</creatorcontrib><description>In the 10 years following the publishing of the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, Fifth Edition (DSM-5), studies have accumulated testing the validity and utility of the alternative model for personality disorders (AMPD) in the context of borderline personality disorder (BPD). In this article, we review the studies that have tested how well the AMPD conceptualization of BPD captures the traditional (DSM-5, Section II) conceptualization of BPD. Although we note that studies that measure the full conceptualization of the AMPD-BPD are limited compared with studies focusing on a single aspect of the AMPD, studies reviewed suggest that the AMPD conceptualization of BPD largely overlaps with Section II, is associated with a similar range of external constructs, and can be measured with similar levels of interrater reliability. This evidence is promising in terms of the goal of the AMPD developers to not lose relevant and clinically meaningful information associated with traditional conceptualizations of BPD. However, further applied research is needed to understand how the AMPD may improve upon our existing categorical conceptualization of BPD.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1949-2715</identifier><identifier>ISSN: 1949-2723</identifier><identifier>ISBN: 143389596X</identifier><identifier>ISBN: 9781433895968</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1949-2723</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1037/per0000563</identifier><identifier>PMID: 35787130</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Educational Publishing Foundation</publisher><subject>Borderline Personality Disorder ; Borderline Personality Disorder - diagnosis ; Clinical Models ; Concept Formation ; Construct Validity ; Diagnostic and Statistical Manual ; Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders ; Human ; Humans ; Interrater Reliability ; Personality Disorders ; Personality Inventory ; Reproducibility of Results</subject><ispartof>Personality disorders, 2022-07, Vol.13 (4), p.402-406</ispartof><rights>2022 American Psychological Association</rights><rights>2022, American Psychological Association</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-a442t-5984caf42257ba2f6d232c6235d7629f19487436e5fd6233965c0e09eba9f3273</citedby><orcidid>0000-0001-6966-2131</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>230,314,776,780,881,27901,27902</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35787130$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><contributor>Miller, Joshua D</contributor><contributor>Sharp, Carla</contributor><creatorcontrib>Vanwoerden, Salome</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Stepp, Stephanie D.</creatorcontrib><title>The Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, Fifth Edition, Alternative Model Conceptualization of Borderline Personality Disorder: A Review of the Evidence</title><title>Personality disorders</title><addtitle>Personal Disord</addtitle><description>In the 10 years following the publishing of the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, Fifth Edition (DSM-5), studies have accumulated testing the validity and utility of the alternative model for personality disorders (AMPD) in the context of borderline personality disorder (BPD). In this article, we review the studies that have tested how well the AMPD conceptualization of BPD captures the traditional (DSM-5, Section II) conceptualization of BPD. Although we note that studies that measure the full conceptualization of the AMPD-BPD are limited compared with studies focusing on a single aspect of the AMPD, studies reviewed suggest that the AMPD conceptualization of BPD largely overlaps with Section II, is associated with a similar range of external constructs, and can be measured with similar levels of interrater reliability. This evidence is promising in terms of the goal of the AMPD developers to not lose relevant and clinically meaningful information associated with traditional conceptualizations of BPD. However, further applied research is needed to understand how the AMPD may improve upon our existing categorical conceptualization of BPD.</description><subject>Borderline Personality Disorder</subject><subject>Borderline Personality Disorder - diagnosis</subject><subject>Clinical Models</subject><subject>Concept Formation</subject><subject>Construct Validity</subject><subject>Diagnostic and Statistical Manual</subject><subject>Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders</subject><subject>Human</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Interrater Reliability</subject><subject>Personality Disorders</subject><subject>Personality Inventory</subject><subject>Reproducibility of Results</subject><issn>1949-2715</issn><issn>1949-2723</issn><issn>1949-2723</issn><isbn>143389596X</isbn><isbn>9781433895968</isbn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2022</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNpdkluPEyEUgImXuBd98QcYkn0xulWG2ww-mNRuV0220eia-EbozJktmymMwNTUn-SvlNmu9cLLAc7Hl8MBhB4X5EVBWPmyh0DyEJLdQYeF4mpCS8ruoqOCM1YpoeTXe_tEIQ7QUYzXhEglePkAHTBRVmXByCH6ebkCfGbNlfMx2Rob1-DPySQ7rkyHF8YNOfgWL8ClPDuz0YcGQjzF57ZNKzxvbLLeneJplyC4fHQDeOEb6PDMuxr6lAX2hxmh0fPm5nhnHeCPWeNdzqbt3vsKT_En2Fj4PsIpVzff2Aay6CG635ouwqPbeIy-nM8vZ-8mFx_evp9NLyaGc5omQlW8Ni2nVJRLQ1vZUEZrSZloSklVm5tSlZxJEG2Td5mSoiZAFCyNahkt2TF6vfP2w3INTZ3vHUyn-2DXJmy1N1b_m3F2pa_8RishKsJUFjy9FQT_bYCY9NrGGrrOOPBD1FRWgjDJGc_oyX_otR9yE7sbiktGK1ll6tmOqoOPMUC7L6YgevwP-s9_yPCTv8vfo7_fPAPPd4Dpje7jtjYhv3UHsR5CyFcaZbpgmmtOKPsFNurAag</recordid><startdate>20220701</startdate><enddate>20220701</enddate><creator>Vanwoerden, Salome</creator><creator>Stepp, Stephanie D.</creator><general>Educational Publishing Foundation</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7RZ</scope><scope>PSYQQ</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6966-2131</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20220701</creationdate><title>The Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, Fifth Edition, Alternative Model Conceptualization of Borderline Personality Disorder: A Review of the Evidence</title><author>Vanwoerden, Salome ; Stepp, Stephanie D.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-a442t-5984caf42257ba2f6d232c6235d7629f19487436e5fd6233965c0e09eba9f3273</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2022</creationdate><topic>Borderline Personality Disorder</topic><topic>Borderline Personality Disorder - diagnosis</topic><topic>Clinical Models</topic><topic>Concept Formation</topic><topic>Construct Validity</topic><topic>Diagnostic and Statistical Manual</topic><topic>Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders</topic><topic>Human</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Interrater Reliability</topic><topic>Personality Disorders</topic><topic>Personality Inventory</topic><topic>Reproducibility of Results</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Vanwoerden, Salome</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Stepp, Stephanie D.</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>APA PsycArticles®</collection><collection>ProQuest One Psychology</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>Personality disorders</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Vanwoerden, Salome</au><au>Stepp, Stephanie D.</au><au>Miller, Joshua D</au><au>Sharp, Carla</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>The Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, Fifth Edition, Alternative Model Conceptualization of Borderline Personality Disorder: A Review of the Evidence</atitle><jtitle>Personality disorders</jtitle><addtitle>Personal Disord</addtitle><date>2022-07-01</date><risdate>2022</risdate><volume>13</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>402</spage><epage>406</epage><pages>402-406</pages><issn>1949-2715</issn><issn>1949-2723</issn><eissn>1949-2723</eissn><isbn>143389596X</isbn><isbn>9781433895968</isbn><abstract>In the 10 years following the publishing of the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, Fifth Edition (DSM-5), studies have accumulated testing the validity and utility of the alternative model for personality disorders (AMPD) in the context of borderline personality disorder (BPD). In this article, we review the studies that have tested how well the AMPD conceptualization of BPD captures the traditional (DSM-5, Section II) conceptualization of BPD. Although we note that studies that measure the full conceptualization of the AMPD-BPD are limited compared with studies focusing on a single aspect of the AMPD, studies reviewed suggest that the AMPD conceptualization of BPD largely overlaps with Section II, is associated with a similar range of external constructs, and can be measured with similar levels of interrater reliability. This evidence is promising in terms of the goal of the AMPD developers to not lose relevant and clinically meaningful information associated with traditional conceptualizations of BPD. However, further applied research is needed to understand how the AMPD may improve upon our existing categorical conceptualization of BPD.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Educational Publishing Foundation</pub><pmid>35787130</pmid><doi>10.1037/per0000563</doi><tpages>5</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6966-2131</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1949-2715 |
ispartof | Personality disorders, 2022-07, Vol.13 (4), p.402-406 |
issn | 1949-2715 1949-2723 1949-2723 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_9558039 |
source | APA PsycARTICLES; MEDLINE |
subjects | Borderline Personality Disorder Borderline Personality Disorder - diagnosis Clinical Models Concept Formation Construct Validity Diagnostic and Statistical Manual Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders Human Humans Interrater Reliability Personality Disorders Personality Inventory Reproducibility of Results |
title | The Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, Fifth Edition, Alternative Model Conceptualization of Borderline Personality Disorder: A Review of the Evidence |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-08T12%3A45%3A24IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=The%20Diagnostic%20and%20Statistical%20Manual%20of%20Mental%20Disorders,%20Fifth%20Edition,%20Alternative%20Model%20Conceptualization%20of%20Borderline%20Personality%20Disorder:%20A%20Review%20of%20the%20Evidence&rft.jtitle=Personality%20disorders&rft.au=Vanwoerden,%20Salome&rft.date=2022-07-01&rft.volume=13&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=402&rft.epage=406&rft.pages=402-406&rft.issn=1949-2715&rft.eissn=1949-2723&rft.isbn=143389596X&rft.isbn_list=9781433895968&rft_id=info:doi/10.1037/per0000563&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E2684632868%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2684632868&rft_id=info:pmid/35787130&rfr_iscdi=true |