Effects of a sudden change in curriculum delivery mode in postgraduate clinical studies, following the COVID-19 pandemic

To examine the effect of a change in the delivery mode of clinical neurology, a postgraduate subject at Macquarie University, following COVID-19 restrictions on face-to-face teaching. Participants were master of chiropractic students (n = 212) who completed 2019 or 2020 clinical neurology. The main...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:The Journal of chiropractic education 2022-10, Vol.36 (2), p.132-141
Hauptverfasser: Frutiger, Martin, Whillier, Stephney
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 141
container_issue 2
container_start_page 132
container_title The Journal of chiropractic education
container_volume 36
creator Frutiger, Martin
Whillier, Stephney
description To examine the effect of a change in the delivery mode of clinical neurology, a postgraduate subject at Macquarie University, following COVID-19 restrictions on face-to-face teaching. Participants were master of chiropractic students (n = 212) who completed 2019 or 2020 clinical neurology. The main outcome measure was a comparison of objective structured clinical examination (OSCE) marks between the 2019 and 2020 cohorts. The 2019 group underwent traditional, face-to-face learning, whereas the 2020 group were taught and examined remotely in session 1 but returned to campus in session 2. Descriptive analyses, between-group differences, and generalized linear models were performed. Means for OSCE marks between the 2 groups were higher in the 2020 group in session 1 (p < .001). However, when students returned to campus in session 2, the means were significantly lower in the 2020 group compared with the 2019 group (p < .001). Generalized linear regression indicated that the web-based mode of delivery in 2020 might have had a significant impact on OSCE marks compared with their 2019 counterparts (p < .001). The sudden change in the mode of delivery from face-to-face to remote learning and the change in testing methods in response to the global COVID-19 pandemic had a significant effect on clinical neurology student performance scores. The OSCE marks in the 2020 cohort for session 1 were higher than those in 2019. However, when the 2020 cohort returned to on-campus tutorials in session 2, their marks were lower than those of their 2019 counterparts.
doi_str_mv 10.7899/JCE-21-31
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_9536236</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2648897754</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c265t-dc3ea867a9bde2a8298be4ee29f84ddfd64aaef4f8cd52fb617ed4a10b7653e53</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpVkV1rFDEUhoModlu98A-UXCo4ms-ZyY1Q1m2tFHqj4l3IJCe7KZnJmkxW--8d21r06hx4H95z4EHoFSXvul6p95_Xm4bRhtMnaMV4JxomyfenaEWJYI0kUh6h41JuCJFcCvkcHXHJlSBCrNCvjfdg54KTxwaX6hxM2O7MtAUclq3mHGyNdcQOYjhAvsVjcnfZPpV5m42rZgZsY5iCNRGXuboA5S32Kcb0M0xbPO8Ar6-_XX5sqMJ7MzkYg32BnnkTC7x8mCfo6_nmy_pTc3V9cbk-u2osa-XcOMvB9G1n1OCAmZ6pfgABwJTvhXPetcIY8ML31knmh5Z24IShZOhayUHyE_ThvndfhxGchWnOJup9DqPJtzqZoP9PprDT23TQSvKW8XYpeP1QkNOPCmXWYygWYjQTpFo0a0Xfq66TYkHf3KM2p1Iy-MczlOg_pvRiSjOqOV3Y03__eiT_quG_ATK7kdg</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2648897754</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Effects of a sudden change in curriculum delivery mode in postgraduate clinical studies, following the COVID-19 pandemic</title><source>Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals</source><source>PubMed Central</source><creator>Frutiger, Martin ; Whillier, Stephney</creator><creatorcontrib>Frutiger, Martin ; Whillier, Stephney</creatorcontrib><description>To examine the effect of a change in the delivery mode of clinical neurology, a postgraduate subject at Macquarie University, following COVID-19 restrictions on face-to-face teaching. Participants were master of chiropractic students (n = 212) who completed 2019 or 2020 clinical neurology. The main outcome measure was a comparison of objective structured clinical examination (OSCE) marks between the 2019 and 2020 cohorts. The 2019 group underwent traditional, face-to-face learning, whereas the 2020 group were taught and examined remotely in session 1 but returned to campus in session 2. Descriptive analyses, between-group differences, and generalized linear models were performed. Means for OSCE marks between the 2 groups were higher in the 2020 group in session 1 (p &lt; .001). However, when students returned to campus in session 2, the means were significantly lower in the 2020 group compared with the 2019 group (p &lt; .001). Generalized linear regression indicated that the web-based mode of delivery in 2020 might have had a significant impact on OSCE marks compared with their 2019 counterparts (p &lt; .001). The sudden change in the mode of delivery from face-to-face to remote learning and the change in testing methods in response to the global COVID-19 pandemic had a significant effect on clinical neurology student performance scores. The OSCE marks in the 2020 cohort for session 1 were higher than those in 2019. However, when the 2020 cohort returned to on-campus tutorials in session 2, their marks were lower than those of their 2019 counterparts.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1042-5055</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2374-250X</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.7899/JCE-21-31</identifier><identifier>PMID: 35394044</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: the Association of Chiropractic Colleges</publisher><subject>Original (Online Only)</subject><ispartof>The Journal of chiropractic education, 2022-10, Vol.36 (2), p.132-141</ispartof><rights>2022 Association of Chiropractic Colleges.</rights><rights>2022 Association of Chiropractic Colleges 2022</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c265t-dc3ea867a9bde2a8298be4ee29f84ddfd64aaef4f8cd52fb617ed4a10b7653e53</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9536236/pdf/$$EPDF$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9536236/$$EHTML$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,727,780,784,885,27915,27916,53782,53784</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35394044$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Frutiger, Martin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Whillier, Stephney</creatorcontrib><title>Effects of a sudden change in curriculum delivery mode in postgraduate clinical studies, following the COVID-19 pandemic</title><title>The Journal of chiropractic education</title><addtitle>J Chiropr Educ</addtitle><description>To examine the effect of a change in the delivery mode of clinical neurology, a postgraduate subject at Macquarie University, following COVID-19 restrictions on face-to-face teaching. Participants were master of chiropractic students (n = 212) who completed 2019 or 2020 clinical neurology. The main outcome measure was a comparison of objective structured clinical examination (OSCE) marks between the 2019 and 2020 cohorts. The 2019 group underwent traditional, face-to-face learning, whereas the 2020 group were taught and examined remotely in session 1 but returned to campus in session 2. Descriptive analyses, between-group differences, and generalized linear models were performed. Means for OSCE marks between the 2 groups were higher in the 2020 group in session 1 (p &lt; .001). However, when students returned to campus in session 2, the means were significantly lower in the 2020 group compared with the 2019 group (p &lt; .001). Generalized linear regression indicated that the web-based mode of delivery in 2020 might have had a significant impact on OSCE marks compared with their 2019 counterparts (p &lt; .001). The sudden change in the mode of delivery from face-to-face to remote learning and the change in testing methods in response to the global COVID-19 pandemic had a significant effect on clinical neurology student performance scores. The OSCE marks in the 2020 cohort for session 1 were higher than those in 2019. However, when the 2020 cohort returned to on-campus tutorials in session 2, their marks were lower than those of their 2019 counterparts.</description><subject>Original (Online Only)</subject><issn>1042-5055</issn><issn>2374-250X</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2022</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNpVkV1rFDEUhoModlu98A-UXCo4ms-ZyY1Q1m2tFHqj4l3IJCe7KZnJmkxW--8d21r06hx4H95z4EHoFSXvul6p95_Xm4bRhtMnaMV4JxomyfenaEWJYI0kUh6h41JuCJFcCvkcHXHJlSBCrNCvjfdg54KTxwaX6hxM2O7MtAUclq3mHGyNdcQOYjhAvsVjcnfZPpV5m42rZgZsY5iCNRGXuboA5S32Kcb0M0xbPO8Ar6-_XX5sqMJ7MzkYg32BnnkTC7x8mCfo6_nmy_pTc3V9cbk-u2osa-XcOMvB9G1n1OCAmZ6pfgABwJTvhXPetcIY8ML31knmh5Z24IShZOhayUHyE_ThvndfhxGchWnOJup9DqPJtzqZoP9PprDT23TQSvKW8XYpeP1QkNOPCmXWYygWYjQTpFo0a0Xfq66TYkHf3KM2p1Iy-MczlOg_pvRiSjOqOV3Y03__eiT_quG_ATK7kdg</recordid><startdate>20221001</startdate><enddate>20221001</enddate><creator>Frutiger, Martin</creator><creator>Whillier, Stephney</creator><general>the Association of Chiropractic Colleges</general><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20221001</creationdate><title>Effects of a sudden change in curriculum delivery mode in postgraduate clinical studies, following the COVID-19 pandemic</title><author>Frutiger, Martin ; Whillier, Stephney</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c265t-dc3ea867a9bde2a8298be4ee29f84ddfd64aaef4f8cd52fb617ed4a10b7653e53</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2022</creationdate><topic>Original (Online Only)</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Frutiger, Martin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Whillier, Stephney</creatorcontrib><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>The Journal of chiropractic education</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Frutiger, Martin</au><au>Whillier, Stephney</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Effects of a sudden change in curriculum delivery mode in postgraduate clinical studies, following the COVID-19 pandemic</atitle><jtitle>The Journal of chiropractic education</jtitle><addtitle>J Chiropr Educ</addtitle><date>2022-10-01</date><risdate>2022</risdate><volume>36</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>132</spage><epage>141</epage><pages>132-141</pages><issn>1042-5055</issn><eissn>2374-250X</eissn><abstract>To examine the effect of a change in the delivery mode of clinical neurology, a postgraduate subject at Macquarie University, following COVID-19 restrictions on face-to-face teaching. Participants were master of chiropractic students (n = 212) who completed 2019 or 2020 clinical neurology. The main outcome measure was a comparison of objective structured clinical examination (OSCE) marks between the 2019 and 2020 cohorts. The 2019 group underwent traditional, face-to-face learning, whereas the 2020 group were taught and examined remotely in session 1 but returned to campus in session 2. Descriptive analyses, between-group differences, and generalized linear models were performed. Means for OSCE marks between the 2 groups were higher in the 2020 group in session 1 (p &lt; .001). However, when students returned to campus in session 2, the means were significantly lower in the 2020 group compared with the 2019 group (p &lt; .001). Generalized linear regression indicated that the web-based mode of delivery in 2020 might have had a significant impact on OSCE marks compared with their 2019 counterparts (p &lt; .001). The sudden change in the mode of delivery from face-to-face to remote learning and the change in testing methods in response to the global COVID-19 pandemic had a significant effect on clinical neurology student performance scores. The OSCE marks in the 2020 cohort for session 1 were higher than those in 2019. However, when the 2020 cohort returned to on-campus tutorials in session 2, their marks were lower than those of their 2019 counterparts.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>the Association of Chiropractic Colleges</pub><pmid>35394044</pmid><doi>10.7899/JCE-21-31</doi><tpages>10</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1042-5055
ispartof The Journal of chiropractic education, 2022-10, Vol.36 (2), p.132-141
issn 1042-5055
2374-250X
language eng
recordid cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_9536236
source Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals; PubMed Central
subjects Original (Online Only)
title Effects of a sudden change in curriculum delivery mode in postgraduate clinical studies, following the COVID-19 pandemic
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-15T05%3A04%3A37IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Effects%20of%20a%20sudden%20change%20in%20curriculum%20delivery%20mode%20in%20postgraduate%20clinical%20studies,%20following%20the%20COVID-19%20pandemic&rft.jtitle=The%20Journal%20of%20chiropractic%20education&rft.au=Frutiger,%20Martin&rft.date=2022-10-01&rft.volume=36&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=132&rft.epage=141&rft.pages=132-141&rft.issn=1042-5055&rft.eissn=2374-250X&rft_id=info:doi/10.7899/JCE-21-31&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E2648897754%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2648897754&rft_id=info:pmid/35394044&rfr_iscdi=true