Does National Wetland Inventory class consistently identify vegetation and edaphic differences in Oregon tidal wetlands?
Accurately mapping, modeling, and managing the diversity of wetlands present in estuaries often relies on habitat classification systems that consistently identify differences in biotic structure or other ecosystem characteristics between classes. We used field data from four Oregon estuaries to tes...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Wetlands ecology and management 2018-06, Vol.26 (3), p.315-329 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 329 |
---|---|
container_issue | 3 |
container_start_page | 315 |
container_title | Wetlands ecology and management |
container_volume | 26 |
creator | Janousek, Christopher N. Folger, Christina L. |
description | Accurately mapping, modeling, and managing the diversity of wetlands present in estuaries often relies on habitat classification systems that consistently identify differences in biotic structure or other ecosystem characteristics between classes. We used field data from four Oregon estuaries to test for differences in vegetation structure and edaphic characteristics among three tidal emergent marsh classes derived from National Wetlands Inventory (NWI) data: low estuarine marsh, high estuarine marsh, and tidal palustrine marsh. Independently of NWI class, we also evaluated the number and types of plant assemblages present and how edaphic variables, non-native plant cover, and plant species richness varied among them. Pore water salinity varied most strongly across marsh classes, with sediment carbon and nitrogen content, grain size and marsh surface elevation showing smaller differences. Cover of common vascular plant species differed between marsh classes and overall vegetation composition was somewhat distinct among marsh types. High estuarine marsh had the largest species pools. However, plot-level plant diversity was similar among marsh classes. Non-native species cover was highest in tidal palustrine and high estuarine marshes. The marshes in the study contained a large number of plant assemblages with most occurring across more than one marsh class. The more common assemblages occurred along a continuum of tidal elevation, soil salinity, and edaphic characteristics, with varying plant richness and non-native cover. Our data suggest that NWI classes are useful for differentiating several general features of Oregon tidal marsh structure, but that more detailed information on plant assemblages found within those wetland classes would allow more precise characterization of additional wetland features such as edaphic conditions and plant diversity. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1007/s11273-017-9575-6 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_9534039</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2048897970</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c475t-8cd4f1d2a437028a289e5b1aa2032d8c65f90bc45f712f31523301bac6e33ee83</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kUuPFCEUhYnRxHb0B7gjceOmlGcBG42Z8THJxNloXBIaLj1MqqGF6tb-99LWRKOJrm4C3zn3wEHoKSUvKCHqZaOUKT4QqgYjlRzGe2hFpWKD0VzcRytiGB-EHulD9Ki1W0K6ytAV-n5RoOGPbk4luwl_gXlyOeDLfIA8l3rEfnKtYV9yS23uZ9MRp9Bnikd8gA3MP6X4JILgdjfJ45BihArZd-eU8XWFTSfmFPqCb8uC9voxehDd1ODJ3TxDn9-9_XT-Ybi6fn95_uZq8ELJedA-iEgDc4IrwrRj2oBcU-cY4SxoP8poyNoLGRVlkVPJOCd07fwInANofoZeLb67_XoLwffo1U12V9PW1aMtLtk_b3K6sZtysEZyQbjpBs_vDGr5uoc2221qHqb-DCj7Zplife3Yg3X02V_obdnX_q-dGokYpaFS_pciQmujjCKdogvla2mtQvwVmRJ7qtwuldteuT1VbseuYYumdTZvoP52_rfoBwugsIw</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2048897970</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Does National Wetland Inventory class consistently identify vegetation and edaphic differences in Oregon tidal wetlands?</title><source>SpringerLink Journals</source><creator>Janousek, Christopher N. ; Folger, Christina L.</creator><creatorcontrib>Janousek, Christopher N. ; Folger, Christina L.</creatorcontrib><description>Accurately mapping, modeling, and managing the diversity of wetlands present in estuaries often relies on habitat classification systems that consistently identify differences in biotic structure or other ecosystem characteristics between classes. We used field data from four Oregon estuaries to test for differences in vegetation structure and edaphic characteristics among three tidal emergent marsh classes derived from National Wetlands Inventory (NWI) data: low estuarine marsh, high estuarine marsh, and tidal palustrine marsh. Independently of NWI class, we also evaluated the number and types of plant assemblages present and how edaphic variables, non-native plant cover, and plant species richness varied among them. Pore water salinity varied most strongly across marsh classes, with sediment carbon and nitrogen content, grain size and marsh surface elevation showing smaller differences. Cover of common vascular plant species differed between marsh classes and overall vegetation composition was somewhat distinct among marsh types. High estuarine marsh had the largest species pools. However, plot-level plant diversity was similar among marsh classes. Non-native species cover was highest in tidal palustrine and high estuarine marshes. The marshes in the study contained a large number of plant assemblages with most occurring across more than one marsh class. The more common assemblages occurred along a continuum of tidal elevation, soil salinity, and edaphic characteristics, with varying plant richness and non-native cover. Our data suggest that NWI classes are useful for differentiating several general features of Oregon tidal marsh structure, but that more detailed information on plant assemblages found within those wetland classes would allow more precise characterization of additional wetland features such as edaphic conditions and plant diversity.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0923-4861</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1572-9834</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s11273-017-9575-6</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Dordrecht: Springer Netherlands</publisher><subject>Biodiversity ; Brackishwater environment ; Classification systems ; Composition ; Conservation Biology/Ecology ; Data ; Elevation ; Environmental Law/Policy/Ecojustice ; Estuaries ; Estuarine environments ; Flowers & plants ; Freshwater & Marine Ecology ; Grain size ; Hydrology/Water Resources ; Indigenous plants ; Indigenous species ; Introduced species ; Life Sciences ; Marine & Freshwater Sciences ; Marshes ; Modelling ; Native organisms ; Original Paper ; Plant diversity ; Plant species ; Plants ; Pore water ; Salinity ; Salinity effects ; Soil ; Soil salinity ; Species richness ; Taxonomy ; Tidal marshes ; Tidal range ; Vegetation ; Water Quality/Water Pollution ; Water salinity ; Wetlands</subject><ispartof>Wetlands ecology and management, 2018-06, Vol.26 (3), p.315-329</ispartof><rights>Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2017</rights><rights>Wetlands Ecology and Management is a copyright of Springer, (2017). All Rights Reserved.</rights><rights>Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2017.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c475t-8cd4f1d2a437028a289e5b1aa2032d8c65f90bc45f712f31523301bac6e33ee83</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c475t-8cd4f1d2a437028a289e5b1aa2032d8c65f90bc45f712f31523301bac6e33ee83</cites><orcidid>0000-0003-2124-6715</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s11273-017-9575-6$$EPDF$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/10.1007/s11273-017-9575-6$$EHTML$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,776,780,881,27901,27902,41464,42533,51294</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Janousek, Christopher N.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Folger, Christina L.</creatorcontrib><title>Does National Wetland Inventory class consistently identify vegetation and edaphic differences in Oregon tidal wetlands?</title><title>Wetlands ecology and management</title><addtitle>Wetlands Ecol Manage</addtitle><description>Accurately mapping, modeling, and managing the diversity of wetlands present in estuaries often relies on habitat classification systems that consistently identify differences in biotic structure or other ecosystem characteristics between classes. We used field data from four Oregon estuaries to test for differences in vegetation structure and edaphic characteristics among three tidal emergent marsh classes derived from National Wetlands Inventory (NWI) data: low estuarine marsh, high estuarine marsh, and tidal palustrine marsh. Independently of NWI class, we also evaluated the number and types of plant assemblages present and how edaphic variables, non-native plant cover, and plant species richness varied among them. Pore water salinity varied most strongly across marsh classes, with sediment carbon and nitrogen content, grain size and marsh surface elevation showing smaller differences. Cover of common vascular plant species differed between marsh classes and overall vegetation composition was somewhat distinct among marsh types. High estuarine marsh had the largest species pools. However, plot-level plant diversity was similar among marsh classes. Non-native species cover was highest in tidal palustrine and high estuarine marshes. The marshes in the study contained a large number of plant assemblages with most occurring across more than one marsh class. The more common assemblages occurred along a continuum of tidal elevation, soil salinity, and edaphic characteristics, with varying plant richness and non-native cover. Our data suggest that NWI classes are useful for differentiating several general features of Oregon tidal marsh structure, but that more detailed information on plant assemblages found within those wetland classes would allow more precise characterization of additional wetland features such as edaphic conditions and plant diversity.</description><subject>Biodiversity</subject><subject>Brackishwater environment</subject><subject>Classification systems</subject><subject>Composition</subject><subject>Conservation Biology/Ecology</subject><subject>Data</subject><subject>Elevation</subject><subject>Environmental Law/Policy/Ecojustice</subject><subject>Estuaries</subject><subject>Estuarine environments</subject><subject>Flowers & plants</subject><subject>Freshwater & Marine Ecology</subject><subject>Grain size</subject><subject>Hydrology/Water Resources</subject><subject>Indigenous plants</subject><subject>Indigenous species</subject><subject>Introduced species</subject><subject>Life Sciences</subject><subject>Marine & Freshwater Sciences</subject><subject>Marshes</subject><subject>Modelling</subject><subject>Native organisms</subject><subject>Original Paper</subject><subject>Plant diversity</subject><subject>Plant species</subject><subject>Plants</subject><subject>Pore water</subject><subject>Salinity</subject><subject>Salinity effects</subject><subject>Soil</subject><subject>Soil salinity</subject><subject>Species richness</subject><subject>Taxonomy</subject><subject>Tidal marshes</subject><subject>Tidal range</subject><subject>Vegetation</subject><subject>Water Quality/Water Pollution</subject><subject>Water salinity</subject><subject>Wetlands</subject><issn>0923-4861</issn><issn>1572-9834</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2018</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kUuPFCEUhYnRxHb0B7gjceOmlGcBG42Z8THJxNloXBIaLj1MqqGF6tb-99LWRKOJrm4C3zn3wEHoKSUvKCHqZaOUKT4QqgYjlRzGe2hFpWKD0VzcRytiGB-EHulD9Ki1W0K6ytAV-n5RoOGPbk4luwl_gXlyOeDLfIA8l3rEfnKtYV9yS23uZ9MRp9Bnikd8gA3MP6X4JILgdjfJ45BihArZd-eU8XWFTSfmFPqCb8uC9voxehDd1ODJ3TxDn9-9_XT-Ybi6fn95_uZq8ELJedA-iEgDc4IrwrRj2oBcU-cY4SxoP8poyNoLGRVlkVPJOCd07fwInANofoZeLb67_XoLwffo1U12V9PW1aMtLtk_b3K6sZtysEZyQbjpBs_vDGr5uoc2221qHqb-DCj7Zplife3Yg3X02V_obdnX_q-dGokYpaFS_pciQmujjCKdogvla2mtQvwVmRJ7qtwuldteuT1VbseuYYumdTZvoP52_rfoBwugsIw</recordid><startdate>20180601</startdate><enddate>20180601</enddate><creator>Janousek, Christopher N.</creator><creator>Folger, Christina L.</creator><general>Springer Netherlands</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7QH</scope><scope>7QL</scope><scope>7SN</scope><scope>7SS</scope><scope>7ST</scope><scope>7T7</scope><scope>7U9</scope><scope>7UA</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88I</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AEUYN</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ATCPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BBNVY</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>BKSAR</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>F1W</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>H94</scope><scope>H97</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>L.G</scope><scope>LK8</scope><scope>M2P</scope><scope>M7N</scope><scope>M7P</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>PATMY</scope><scope>PCBAR</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PYCSY</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>RC3</scope><scope>SOI</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2124-6715</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20180601</creationdate><title>Does National Wetland Inventory class consistently identify vegetation and edaphic differences in Oregon tidal wetlands?</title><author>Janousek, Christopher N. ; Folger, Christina L.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c475t-8cd4f1d2a437028a289e5b1aa2032d8c65f90bc45f712f31523301bac6e33ee83</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2018</creationdate><topic>Biodiversity</topic><topic>Brackishwater environment</topic><topic>Classification systems</topic><topic>Composition</topic><topic>Conservation Biology/Ecology</topic><topic>Data</topic><topic>Elevation</topic><topic>Environmental Law/Policy/Ecojustice</topic><topic>Estuaries</topic><topic>Estuarine environments</topic><topic>Flowers & plants</topic><topic>Freshwater & Marine Ecology</topic><topic>Grain size</topic><topic>Hydrology/Water Resources</topic><topic>Indigenous plants</topic><topic>Indigenous species</topic><topic>Introduced species</topic><topic>Life Sciences</topic><topic>Marine & Freshwater Sciences</topic><topic>Marshes</topic><topic>Modelling</topic><topic>Native organisms</topic><topic>Original Paper</topic><topic>Plant diversity</topic><topic>Plant species</topic><topic>Plants</topic><topic>Pore water</topic><topic>Salinity</topic><topic>Salinity effects</topic><topic>Soil</topic><topic>Soil salinity</topic><topic>Species richness</topic><topic>Taxonomy</topic><topic>Tidal marshes</topic><topic>Tidal range</topic><topic>Vegetation</topic><topic>Water Quality/Water Pollution</topic><topic>Water salinity</topic><topic>Wetlands</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Janousek, Christopher N.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Folger, Christina L.</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Aqualine</collection><collection>Bacteriology Abstracts (Microbiology B)</collection><collection>Ecology Abstracts</collection><collection>Entomology Abstracts (Full archive)</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Industrial and Applied Microbiology Abstracts (Microbiology A)</collection><collection>Virology and AIDS Abstracts</collection><collection>Water Resources Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Science Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Sustainability</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Agricultural & Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Earth, Atmospheric & Aquatic Science Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>ASFA: Aquatic Sciences and Fisheries Abstracts</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts</collection><collection>Aquatic Science & Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) 3: Aquatic Pollution & Environmental Quality</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>Aquatic Science & Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) Professional</collection><collection>ProQuest Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>Science Database</collection><collection>Algology Mycology and Protozoology Abstracts (Microbiology C)</collection><collection>Biological Science Database</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Environmental Science Database</collection><collection>Earth, Atmospheric & Aquatic Science Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>Genetics Abstracts</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>Wetlands ecology and management</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Janousek, Christopher N.</au><au>Folger, Christina L.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Does National Wetland Inventory class consistently identify vegetation and edaphic differences in Oregon tidal wetlands?</atitle><jtitle>Wetlands ecology and management</jtitle><stitle>Wetlands Ecol Manage</stitle><date>2018-06-01</date><risdate>2018</risdate><volume>26</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>315</spage><epage>329</epage><pages>315-329</pages><issn>0923-4861</issn><eissn>1572-9834</eissn><abstract>Accurately mapping, modeling, and managing the diversity of wetlands present in estuaries often relies on habitat classification systems that consistently identify differences in biotic structure or other ecosystem characteristics between classes. We used field data from four Oregon estuaries to test for differences in vegetation structure and edaphic characteristics among three tidal emergent marsh classes derived from National Wetlands Inventory (NWI) data: low estuarine marsh, high estuarine marsh, and tidal palustrine marsh. Independently of NWI class, we also evaluated the number and types of plant assemblages present and how edaphic variables, non-native plant cover, and plant species richness varied among them. Pore water salinity varied most strongly across marsh classes, with sediment carbon and nitrogen content, grain size and marsh surface elevation showing smaller differences. Cover of common vascular plant species differed between marsh classes and overall vegetation composition was somewhat distinct among marsh types. High estuarine marsh had the largest species pools. However, plot-level plant diversity was similar among marsh classes. Non-native species cover was highest in tidal palustrine and high estuarine marshes. The marshes in the study contained a large number of plant assemblages with most occurring across more than one marsh class. The more common assemblages occurred along a continuum of tidal elevation, soil salinity, and edaphic characteristics, with varying plant richness and non-native cover. Our data suggest that NWI classes are useful for differentiating several general features of Oregon tidal marsh structure, but that more detailed information on plant assemblages found within those wetland classes would allow more precise characterization of additional wetland features such as edaphic conditions and plant diversity.</abstract><cop>Dordrecht</cop><pub>Springer Netherlands</pub><doi>10.1007/s11273-017-9575-6</doi><tpages>15</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2124-6715</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0923-4861 |
ispartof | Wetlands ecology and management, 2018-06, Vol.26 (3), p.315-329 |
issn | 0923-4861 1572-9834 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_9534039 |
source | SpringerLink Journals |
subjects | Biodiversity Brackishwater environment Classification systems Composition Conservation Biology/Ecology Data Elevation Environmental Law/Policy/Ecojustice Estuaries Estuarine environments Flowers & plants Freshwater & Marine Ecology Grain size Hydrology/Water Resources Indigenous plants Indigenous species Introduced species Life Sciences Marine & Freshwater Sciences Marshes Modelling Native organisms Original Paper Plant diversity Plant species Plants Pore water Salinity Salinity effects Soil Soil salinity Species richness Taxonomy Tidal marshes Tidal range Vegetation Water Quality/Water Pollution Water salinity Wetlands |
title | Does National Wetland Inventory class consistently identify vegetation and edaphic differences in Oregon tidal wetlands? |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-10T08%3A05%3A41IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Does%20National%20Wetland%20Inventory%20class%20consistently%20identify%20vegetation%20and%20edaphic%20differences%20in%20Oregon%20tidal%20wetlands?&rft.jtitle=Wetlands%20ecology%20and%20management&rft.au=Janousek,%20Christopher%20N.&rft.date=2018-06-01&rft.volume=26&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=315&rft.epage=329&rft.pages=315-329&rft.issn=0923-4861&rft.eissn=1572-9834&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s11273-017-9575-6&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E2048897970%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2048897970&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |