Pre-validation study of spectrophotometric direct peptide reactivity assay (Spectro-DPRA) as a modified in chemico skin sensitization test method
Skin sensitization is induced when certain chemicals bind to skin proteins. Direct peptide reactivity assay (DPRA) has been adopted by the OECD as an alternative method to evaluate skin sensitization by assessing a substance's reaction to two model peptides. A modified spectrophotometric method...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Toxicological research (Seoul) 2022-10, Vol.38 (4), p.531-544 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 544 |
---|---|
container_issue | 4 |
container_start_page | 531 |
container_title | Toxicological research (Seoul) |
container_volume | 38 |
creator | Seo, Jung-Ah Cho, Sun-A Park, Chang Eon Seo, Dong Hyuk Choi, Myungsuk An, Susun Kim, Bae-Hwan |
description | Skin sensitization is induced when certain chemicals bind to skin proteins. Direct peptide reactivity assay (DPRA) has been adopted by the OECD as an alternative method to evaluate skin sensitization by assessing a substance's reaction to two model peptides. A modified spectrophotometric method, Spectro-DPRA, can evaluate skin sensitization, in a high throughput fashion, to obviate some limitations of DPRA. Pre-validation studies for Spectro-DPRA were conducted to determine transferability and proficiency, within- and between-laboratory reproducibility, and predictive ability based on GLP principles at three laboratories (AP, KTR, and KCL). All laboratories confirmed high (> 90%) concordance for evaluating the sensitivity induced by ten chemical substances. The concordance among the three tests performed by each laboratory was 90% for AP, 100% for KTR, and 100% for KCL. The mean accuracy of the laboratories was 93.3% [compared to the standard operating procedure (SOP)]. The reproducibility among the three laboratories was as high as 86.7%; the accuracy was 86.7% for AP, 100% for KTR, and 86.7% for KCL (compared to the SOP). An additional 54 substances were assessed in 3 separate labs to verify the prediction rate. Based on the result, 29 out of 33 substances were classified as sensitizers, and 19 out of 21 identified as non-sensitizers; the corresponding sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy values were 87.9%, 90.5%, and 88.9%, respectively. These findings indicate that the Spectro-DPRA can address the molecular initiating event with improved predictability and reproducibility, while saving time and cost compared to DPRA or ADRA. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1007/s43188-022-00130-8 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_9532475</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2728142403</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c379t-378b1f1786f7819fc30edc5d11fa2f3337a74c083f4583e35f7953f6cc3da5393</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9Uctu1TAQtRAVvbrtD7DysixMbU8SOxukqpQWqRIVj7Xl-tHrksTBdq50-Qv-uIZUSGyYjTXj89DMQeg1o28ZpeI8N8CkJJRzQikDSuQLtOEcGsJFCy_RhvWiI5K34hid5vxIa7WN6Gj_Ch1Dx4WAtt-gX3fJkb0egtUlxAnnstgDjh7n2ZmS4ryLJY6upGCwDanO8OzmEqzDyWlTwj6UA9Y56wM--7JyyPu7zxdv6hBrPEYbfHAWhwmbnRuDiTh_r012Uw4l_Fxti8sFV5tdtCfoyOshu9Pnd4u-fbj6enlDbj9df7y8uCUGRF8ICHnPPBOy80Ky3hugzprWMuY19wAgtGgMleCbVoKD1ou-Bd8ZA1a30MMWvVt15-V-rFQ3laQHNacw6nRQUQf1788Uduoh7lWV4U298RadPQuk-GOpC6gxZOOGQU8uLllxwSVreEOhQvkKNSnmnJz_a8Oo-h2nWuNUNU71J04lKwlWUq7g6cEl9RiXNNWb_I_1BIojpPA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2728142403</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Pre-validation study of spectrophotometric direct peptide reactivity assay (Spectro-DPRA) as a modified in chemico skin sensitization test method</title><source>SpringerNature Journals</source><source>PubMed Central</source><creator>Seo, Jung-Ah ; Cho, Sun-A ; Park, Chang Eon ; Seo, Dong Hyuk ; Choi, Myungsuk ; An, Susun ; Kim, Bae-Hwan</creator><creatorcontrib>Seo, Jung-Ah ; Cho, Sun-A ; Park, Chang Eon ; Seo, Dong Hyuk ; Choi, Myungsuk ; An, Susun ; Kim, Bae-Hwan</creatorcontrib><description>Skin sensitization is induced when certain chemicals bind to skin proteins. Direct peptide reactivity assay (DPRA) has been adopted by the OECD as an alternative method to evaluate skin sensitization by assessing a substance's reaction to two model peptides. A modified spectrophotometric method, Spectro-DPRA, can evaluate skin sensitization, in a high throughput fashion, to obviate some limitations of DPRA. Pre-validation studies for Spectro-DPRA were conducted to determine transferability and proficiency, within- and between-laboratory reproducibility, and predictive ability based on GLP principles at three laboratories (AP, KTR, and KCL). All laboratories confirmed high (> 90%) concordance for evaluating the sensitivity induced by ten chemical substances. The concordance among the three tests performed by each laboratory was 90% for AP, 100% for KTR, and 100% for KCL. The mean accuracy of the laboratories was 93.3% [compared to the standard operating procedure (SOP)]. The reproducibility among the three laboratories was as high as 86.7%; the accuracy was 86.7% for AP, 100% for KTR, and 86.7% for KCL (compared to the SOP). An additional 54 substances were assessed in 3 separate labs to verify the prediction rate. Based on the result, 29 out of 33 substances were classified as sensitizers, and 19 out of 21 identified as non-sensitizers; the corresponding sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy values were 87.9%, 90.5%, and 88.9%, respectively. These findings indicate that the Spectro-DPRA can address the molecular initiating event with improved predictability and reproducibility, while saving time and cost compared to DPRA or ADRA.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1976-8257</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2234-2753</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s43188-022-00130-8</identifier><identifier>PMID: 36277359</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Singapore: Springer Nature Singapore</publisher><subject>Biomedical and Life Sciences ; Biomedicine ; Original ; Original Article ; Pharmacology/Toxicology</subject><ispartof>Toxicological research (Seoul), 2022-10, Vol.38 (4), p.531-544</ispartof><rights>The Author(s) under exclusive licence to Korean Society of Toxicology 2022</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c379t-378b1f1786f7819fc30edc5d11fa2f3337a74c083f4583e35f7953f6cc3da5393</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c379t-378b1f1786f7819fc30edc5d11fa2f3337a74c083f4583e35f7953f6cc3da5393</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-5898-0748</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9532475/pdf/$$EPDF$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9532475/$$EHTML$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,727,780,784,885,27924,27925,41488,42557,51319,53791,53793</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Seo, Jung-Ah</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cho, Sun-A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Park, Chang Eon</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Seo, Dong Hyuk</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Choi, Myungsuk</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>An, Susun</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kim, Bae-Hwan</creatorcontrib><title>Pre-validation study of spectrophotometric direct peptide reactivity assay (Spectro-DPRA) as a modified in chemico skin sensitization test method</title><title>Toxicological research (Seoul)</title><addtitle>Toxicol Res</addtitle><description>Skin sensitization is induced when certain chemicals bind to skin proteins. Direct peptide reactivity assay (DPRA) has been adopted by the OECD as an alternative method to evaluate skin sensitization by assessing a substance's reaction to two model peptides. A modified spectrophotometric method, Spectro-DPRA, can evaluate skin sensitization, in a high throughput fashion, to obviate some limitations of DPRA. Pre-validation studies for Spectro-DPRA were conducted to determine transferability and proficiency, within- and between-laboratory reproducibility, and predictive ability based on GLP principles at three laboratories (AP, KTR, and KCL). All laboratories confirmed high (> 90%) concordance for evaluating the sensitivity induced by ten chemical substances. The concordance among the three tests performed by each laboratory was 90% for AP, 100% for KTR, and 100% for KCL. The mean accuracy of the laboratories was 93.3% [compared to the standard operating procedure (SOP)]. The reproducibility among the three laboratories was as high as 86.7%; the accuracy was 86.7% for AP, 100% for KTR, and 86.7% for KCL (compared to the SOP). An additional 54 substances were assessed in 3 separate labs to verify the prediction rate. Based on the result, 29 out of 33 substances were classified as sensitizers, and 19 out of 21 identified as non-sensitizers; the corresponding sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy values were 87.9%, 90.5%, and 88.9%, respectively. These findings indicate that the Spectro-DPRA can address the molecular initiating event with improved predictability and reproducibility, while saving time and cost compared to DPRA or ADRA.</description><subject>Biomedical and Life Sciences</subject><subject>Biomedicine</subject><subject>Original</subject><subject>Original Article</subject><subject>Pharmacology/Toxicology</subject><issn>1976-8257</issn><issn>2234-2753</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2022</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp9Uctu1TAQtRAVvbrtD7DysixMbU8SOxukqpQWqRIVj7Xl-tHrksTBdq50-Qv-uIZUSGyYjTXj89DMQeg1o28ZpeI8N8CkJJRzQikDSuQLtOEcGsJFCy_RhvWiI5K34hid5vxIa7WN6Gj_Ch1Dx4WAtt-gX3fJkb0egtUlxAnnstgDjh7n2ZmS4ryLJY6upGCwDanO8OzmEqzDyWlTwj6UA9Y56wM--7JyyPu7zxdv6hBrPEYbfHAWhwmbnRuDiTh_r012Uw4l_Fxti8sFV5tdtCfoyOshu9Pnd4u-fbj6enlDbj9df7y8uCUGRF8ICHnPPBOy80Ky3hugzprWMuY19wAgtGgMleCbVoKD1ou-Bd8ZA1a30MMWvVt15-V-rFQ3laQHNacw6nRQUQf1788Uduoh7lWV4U298RadPQuk-GOpC6gxZOOGQU8uLllxwSVreEOhQvkKNSnmnJz_a8Oo-h2nWuNUNU71J04lKwlWUq7g6cEl9RiXNNWb_I_1BIojpPA</recordid><startdate>20221001</startdate><enddate>20221001</enddate><creator>Seo, Jung-Ah</creator><creator>Cho, Sun-A</creator><creator>Park, Chang Eon</creator><creator>Seo, Dong Hyuk</creator><creator>Choi, Myungsuk</creator><creator>An, Susun</creator><creator>Kim, Bae-Hwan</creator><general>Springer Nature Singapore</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5898-0748</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20221001</creationdate><title>Pre-validation study of spectrophotometric direct peptide reactivity assay (Spectro-DPRA) as a modified in chemico skin sensitization test method</title><author>Seo, Jung-Ah ; Cho, Sun-A ; Park, Chang Eon ; Seo, Dong Hyuk ; Choi, Myungsuk ; An, Susun ; Kim, Bae-Hwan</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c379t-378b1f1786f7819fc30edc5d11fa2f3337a74c083f4583e35f7953f6cc3da5393</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2022</creationdate><topic>Biomedical and Life Sciences</topic><topic>Biomedicine</topic><topic>Original</topic><topic>Original Article</topic><topic>Pharmacology/Toxicology</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Seo, Jung-Ah</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cho, Sun-A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Park, Chang Eon</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Seo, Dong Hyuk</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Choi, Myungsuk</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>An, Susun</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kim, Bae-Hwan</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>Toxicological research (Seoul)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Seo, Jung-Ah</au><au>Cho, Sun-A</au><au>Park, Chang Eon</au><au>Seo, Dong Hyuk</au><au>Choi, Myungsuk</au><au>An, Susun</au><au>Kim, Bae-Hwan</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Pre-validation study of spectrophotometric direct peptide reactivity assay (Spectro-DPRA) as a modified in chemico skin sensitization test method</atitle><jtitle>Toxicological research (Seoul)</jtitle><stitle>Toxicol Res</stitle><date>2022-10-01</date><risdate>2022</risdate><volume>38</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>531</spage><epage>544</epage><pages>531-544</pages><issn>1976-8257</issn><eissn>2234-2753</eissn><abstract>Skin sensitization is induced when certain chemicals bind to skin proteins. Direct peptide reactivity assay (DPRA) has been adopted by the OECD as an alternative method to evaluate skin sensitization by assessing a substance's reaction to two model peptides. A modified spectrophotometric method, Spectro-DPRA, can evaluate skin sensitization, in a high throughput fashion, to obviate some limitations of DPRA. Pre-validation studies for Spectro-DPRA were conducted to determine transferability and proficiency, within- and between-laboratory reproducibility, and predictive ability based on GLP principles at three laboratories (AP, KTR, and KCL). All laboratories confirmed high (> 90%) concordance for evaluating the sensitivity induced by ten chemical substances. The concordance among the three tests performed by each laboratory was 90% for AP, 100% for KTR, and 100% for KCL. The mean accuracy of the laboratories was 93.3% [compared to the standard operating procedure (SOP)]. The reproducibility among the three laboratories was as high as 86.7%; the accuracy was 86.7% for AP, 100% for KTR, and 86.7% for KCL (compared to the SOP). An additional 54 substances were assessed in 3 separate labs to verify the prediction rate. Based on the result, 29 out of 33 substances were classified as sensitizers, and 19 out of 21 identified as non-sensitizers; the corresponding sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy values were 87.9%, 90.5%, and 88.9%, respectively. These findings indicate that the Spectro-DPRA can address the molecular initiating event with improved predictability and reproducibility, while saving time and cost compared to DPRA or ADRA.</abstract><cop>Singapore</cop><pub>Springer Nature Singapore</pub><pmid>36277359</pmid><doi>10.1007/s43188-022-00130-8</doi><tpages>14</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5898-0748</orcidid></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1976-8257 |
ispartof | Toxicological research (Seoul), 2022-10, Vol.38 (4), p.531-544 |
issn | 1976-8257 2234-2753 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_9532475 |
source | SpringerNature Journals; PubMed Central |
subjects | Biomedical and Life Sciences Biomedicine Original Original Article Pharmacology/Toxicology |
title | Pre-validation study of spectrophotometric direct peptide reactivity assay (Spectro-DPRA) as a modified in chemico skin sensitization test method |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-01T17%3A53%3A05IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Pre-validation%20study%20of%20spectrophotometric%20direct%20peptide%20reactivity%20assay%20(Spectro-DPRA)%20as%20a%20modified%20in%20chemico%20skin%20sensitization%20test%20method&rft.jtitle=Toxicological%20research%20(Seoul)&rft.au=Seo,%20Jung-Ah&rft.date=2022-10-01&rft.volume=38&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=531&rft.epage=544&rft.pages=531-544&rft.issn=1976-8257&rft.eissn=2234-2753&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s43188-022-00130-8&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E2728142403%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2728142403&rft_id=info:pmid/36277359&rfr_iscdi=true |