The effect of choosing optimizer algorithms to improve computer vision tasks: a comparative study

Optimization algorithms are used to improve model accuracy. The optimization process undergoes multiple cycles until convergence. A variety of optimization strategies have been developed to overcome the obstacles involved in the learning process. Some of these strategies have been considered in this...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Multimedia tools and applications 2023-05, Vol.82 (11), p.16591-16633
Hauptverfasser: Hassan, Esraa, Shams, Mahmoud Y., Hikal, Noha A., Elmougy, Samir
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 16633
container_issue 11
container_start_page 16591
container_title Multimedia tools and applications
container_volume 82
creator Hassan, Esraa
Shams, Mahmoud Y.
Hikal, Noha A.
Elmougy, Samir
description Optimization algorithms are used to improve model accuracy. The optimization process undergoes multiple cycles until convergence. A variety of optimization strategies have been developed to overcome the obstacles involved in the learning process. Some of these strategies have been considered in this study to learn more about their complexities. It is crucial to analyse and summarise optimization techniques methodically from a machine learning standpoint since this can provide direction for future work in both machine learning and optimization. The approaches under consideration include the Stochastic Gradient Descent (SGD), Stochastic Optimization Descent with Momentum, Rung Kutta, Adaptive Learning Rate, Root Mean Square Propagation, Adaptive Moment Estimation, Deep Ensembles, Feedback Alignment, Direct Feedback Alignment, Adfactor, AMSGrad, and Gravity. prove the ability of each optimizer applied to machine learning models. Firstly, tests on a skin cancer using the ISIC standard dataset for skin cancer detection were applied using three common optimizers (Adaptive Moment, SGD, and Root Mean Square Propagation) to explore the effect of the algorithms on the skin images. The optimal training results from the analysis indicate that the performance values are enhanced using the Adam optimizer, which achieved 97.30% accuracy. The second dataset is COVIDx CT images, and the results achieved are 99.07% accuracy based on the Adam optimizer. The result indicated that the utilisation of optimizers such as SGD and Adam improved the accuracy in training, testing, and validation stages.
doi_str_mv 10.1007/s11042-022-13820-0
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_9514986</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2720925524</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c474t-cbb492b064f6d4f6dfc00202c94298d5438a3f7822124af03e9b3a50614319753</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kU1vFSEUhonR2A_9Ay4MiRs3o4cDDDMuTJrGqkkTN3VNGC7cS50ZRmBuUn-9tLfWj4ULckje57xwzkvICwZvGIB6mxkDgQ0gNox3CA08IsdMKt4ohexxvfMOGiWBHZGTnK8BWCtRPCVHvGWd5CiOibnaOeq8d7bQ6KndxZjDvKVxKWEKP1yiZtzGFMpuyrREGqYlxb2jNk7LWqq8DznEmRaTv-V31NwJJpkSKpTLurl5Rp54M2b3_L6ekq8XH67OPzWXXz5-Pj-7bKxQojR2GESPA7TCt5vb4y0AAtpeYN9tpOCd4V51iAyF8cBdP3AjoWWCs15JfkreH3yXdZjcxrq5JDPqJYXJpBsdTdB_K3PY6W3c614y0XdtNXh9b5Di99XloqeQrRtHM7u4Zo0KoUdZN1jRV_-g13FNcx1PYwdMgOCtqhQeKJtizsn5h88w0LcJ6kOCuiao7xLUUJte_jnGQ8uvyCrAD0Cu0rx16ffb_7H9Ce_0p08</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2801404367</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>The effect of choosing optimizer algorithms to improve computer vision tasks: a comparative study</title><source>SpringerLink Journals</source><creator>Hassan, Esraa ; Shams, Mahmoud Y. ; Hikal, Noha A. ; Elmougy, Samir</creator><creatorcontrib>Hassan, Esraa ; Shams, Mahmoud Y. ; Hikal, Noha A. ; Elmougy, Samir</creatorcontrib><description>Optimization algorithms are used to improve model accuracy. The optimization process undergoes multiple cycles until convergence. A variety of optimization strategies have been developed to overcome the obstacles involved in the learning process. Some of these strategies have been considered in this study to learn more about their complexities. It is crucial to analyse and summarise optimization techniques methodically from a machine learning standpoint since this can provide direction for future work in both machine learning and optimization. The approaches under consideration include the Stochastic Gradient Descent (SGD), Stochastic Optimization Descent with Momentum, Rung Kutta, Adaptive Learning Rate, Root Mean Square Propagation, Adaptive Moment Estimation, Deep Ensembles, Feedback Alignment, Direct Feedback Alignment, Adfactor, AMSGrad, and Gravity. prove the ability of each optimizer applied to machine learning models. Firstly, tests on a skin cancer using the ISIC standard dataset for skin cancer detection were applied using three common optimizers (Adaptive Moment, SGD, and Root Mean Square Propagation) to explore the effect of the algorithms on the skin images. The optimal training results from the analysis indicate that the performance values are enhanced using the Adam optimizer, which achieved 97.30% accuracy. The second dataset is COVIDx CT images, and the results achieved are 99.07% accuracy based on the Adam optimizer. The result indicated that the utilisation of optimizers such as SGD and Adam improved the accuracy in training, testing, and validation stages.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1380-7501</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1573-7721</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s11042-022-13820-0</identifier><identifier>PMID: 36185324</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>New York: Springer US</publisher><subject>Accuracy ; Algorithms ; Alignment ; Cancer ; Comparative studies ; Computed tomography ; Computer Communication Networks ; Computer Science ; Computer vision ; Data Structures and Information Theory ; Datasets ; Feedback ; Machine learning ; Medical imaging ; Model accuracy ; Multimedia Information Systems ; Optimization ; Optimization techniques ; Propagation ; Skin cancer ; Special Purpose and Application-Based Systems ; Training</subject><ispartof>Multimedia tools and applications, 2023-05, Vol.82 (11), p.16591-16633</ispartof><rights>The Author(s) 2022</rights><rights>The Author(s) 2022.</rights><rights>The Author(s) 2022. This work is published under http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c474t-cbb492b064f6d4f6dfc00202c94298d5438a3f7822124af03e9b3a50614319753</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c474t-cbb492b064f6d4f6dfc00202c94298d5438a3f7822124af03e9b3a50614319753</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-5732-6322</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s11042-022-13820-0$$EPDF$$P50$$Gspringer$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/10.1007/s11042-022-13820-0$$EHTML$$P50$$Gspringer$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,776,780,881,27903,27904,41467,42536,51297</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36185324$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Hassan, Esraa</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Shams, Mahmoud Y.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hikal, Noha A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Elmougy, Samir</creatorcontrib><title>The effect of choosing optimizer algorithms to improve computer vision tasks: a comparative study</title><title>Multimedia tools and applications</title><addtitle>Multimed Tools Appl</addtitle><addtitle>Multimed Tools Appl</addtitle><description>Optimization algorithms are used to improve model accuracy. The optimization process undergoes multiple cycles until convergence. A variety of optimization strategies have been developed to overcome the obstacles involved in the learning process. Some of these strategies have been considered in this study to learn more about their complexities. It is crucial to analyse and summarise optimization techniques methodically from a machine learning standpoint since this can provide direction for future work in both machine learning and optimization. The approaches under consideration include the Stochastic Gradient Descent (SGD), Stochastic Optimization Descent with Momentum, Rung Kutta, Adaptive Learning Rate, Root Mean Square Propagation, Adaptive Moment Estimation, Deep Ensembles, Feedback Alignment, Direct Feedback Alignment, Adfactor, AMSGrad, and Gravity. prove the ability of each optimizer applied to machine learning models. Firstly, tests on a skin cancer using the ISIC standard dataset for skin cancer detection were applied using three common optimizers (Adaptive Moment, SGD, and Root Mean Square Propagation) to explore the effect of the algorithms on the skin images. The optimal training results from the analysis indicate that the performance values are enhanced using the Adam optimizer, which achieved 97.30% accuracy. The second dataset is COVIDx CT images, and the results achieved are 99.07% accuracy based on the Adam optimizer. The result indicated that the utilisation of optimizers such as SGD and Adam improved the accuracy in training, testing, and validation stages.</description><subject>Accuracy</subject><subject>Algorithms</subject><subject>Alignment</subject><subject>Cancer</subject><subject>Comparative studies</subject><subject>Computed tomography</subject><subject>Computer Communication Networks</subject><subject>Computer Science</subject><subject>Computer vision</subject><subject>Data Structures and Information Theory</subject><subject>Datasets</subject><subject>Feedback</subject><subject>Machine learning</subject><subject>Medical imaging</subject><subject>Model accuracy</subject><subject>Multimedia Information Systems</subject><subject>Optimization</subject><subject>Optimization techniques</subject><subject>Propagation</subject><subject>Skin cancer</subject><subject>Special Purpose and Application-Based Systems</subject><subject>Training</subject><issn>1380-7501</issn><issn>1573-7721</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2023</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>C6C</sourceid><sourceid>8G5</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><sourceid>GUQSH</sourceid><sourceid>M2O</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kU1vFSEUhonR2A_9Ay4MiRs3o4cDDDMuTJrGqkkTN3VNGC7cS50ZRmBuUn-9tLfWj4ULckje57xwzkvICwZvGIB6mxkDgQ0gNox3CA08IsdMKt4ohexxvfMOGiWBHZGTnK8BWCtRPCVHvGWd5CiOibnaOeq8d7bQ6KndxZjDvKVxKWEKP1yiZtzGFMpuyrREGqYlxb2jNk7LWqq8DznEmRaTv-V31NwJJpkSKpTLurl5Rp54M2b3_L6ekq8XH67OPzWXXz5-Pj-7bKxQojR2GESPA7TCt5vb4y0AAtpeYN9tpOCd4V51iAyF8cBdP3AjoWWCs15JfkreH3yXdZjcxrq5JDPqJYXJpBsdTdB_K3PY6W3c614y0XdtNXh9b5Di99XloqeQrRtHM7u4Zo0KoUdZN1jRV_-g13FNcx1PYwdMgOCtqhQeKJtizsn5h88w0LcJ6kOCuiao7xLUUJte_jnGQ8uvyCrAD0Cu0rx16ffb_7H9Ce_0p08</recordid><startdate>20230501</startdate><enddate>20230501</enddate><creator>Hassan, Esraa</creator><creator>Shams, Mahmoud Y.</creator><creator>Hikal, Noha A.</creator><creator>Elmougy, Samir</creator><general>Springer US</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>C6C</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7SC</scope><scope>7WY</scope><scope>7WZ</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>87Z</scope><scope>8AL</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FG</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8FL</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ARAPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BEZIV</scope><scope>BGLVJ</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FRNLG</scope><scope>F~G</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>JQ2</scope><scope>K60</scope><scope>K6~</scope><scope>K7-</scope><scope>L.-</scope><scope>L7M</scope><scope>L~C</scope><scope>L~D</scope><scope>M0C</scope><scope>M0N</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>P5Z</scope><scope>P62</scope><scope>PQBIZ</scope><scope>PQBZA</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5732-6322</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20230501</creationdate><title>The effect of choosing optimizer algorithms to improve computer vision tasks: a comparative study</title><author>Hassan, Esraa ; Shams, Mahmoud Y. ; Hikal, Noha A. ; Elmougy, Samir</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c474t-cbb492b064f6d4f6dfc00202c94298d5438a3f7822124af03e9b3a50614319753</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2023</creationdate><topic>Accuracy</topic><topic>Algorithms</topic><topic>Alignment</topic><topic>Cancer</topic><topic>Comparative studies</topic><topic>Computed tomography</topic><topic>Computer Communication Networks</topic><topic>Computer Science</topic><topic>Computer vision</topic><topic>Data Structures and Information Theory</topic><topic>Datasets</topic><topic>Feedback</topic><topic>Machine learning</topic><topic>Medical imaging</topic><topic>Model accuracy</topic><topic>Multimedia Information Systems</topic><topic>Optimization</topic><topic>Optimization techniques</topic><topic>Propagation</topic><topic>Skin cancer</topic><topic>Special Purpose and Application-Based Systems</topic><topic>Training</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Hassan, Esraa</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Shams, Mahmoud Y.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hikal, Noha A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Elmougy, Samir</creatorcontrib><collection>Springer Nature OA Free Journals</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Computer and Information Systems Abstracts</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (PDF only)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Computing Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies &amp; Aerospace Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Business Premium Collection</collection><collection>Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Business Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (Corporate)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Computer Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection</collection><collection>Computer Science Database</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Professional Advanced</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies Database with Aerospace</collection><collection>Computer and Information Systems Abstracts – Academic</collection><collection>Computer and Information Systems Abstracts Professional</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global</collection><collection>Computing Database</collection><collection>Research Library</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies &amp; Aerospace Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Advanced Technologies &amp; Aerospace Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Business</collection><collection>ProQuest One Business (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>Multimedia tools and applications</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Hassan, Esraa</au><au>Shams, Mahmoud Y.</au><au>Hikal, Noha A.</au><au>Elmougy, Samir</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>The effect of choosing optimizer algorithms to improve computer vision tasks: a comparative study</atitle><jtitle>Multimedia tools and applications</jtitle><stitle>Multimed Tools Appl</stitle><addtitle>Multimed Tools Appl</addtitle><date>2023-05-01</date><risdate>2023</risdate><volume>82</volume><issue>11</issue><spage>16591</spage><epage>16633</epage><pages>16591-16633</pages><issn>1380-7501</issn><eissn>1573-7721</eissn><abstract>Optimization algorithms are used to improve model accuracy. The optimization process undergoes multiple cycles until convergence. A variety of optimization strategies have been developed to overcome the obstacles involved in the learning process. Some of these strategies have been considered in this study to learn more about their complexities. It is crucial to analyse and summarise optimization techniques methodically from a machine learning standpoint since this can provide direction for future work in both machine learning and optimization. The approaches under consideration include the Stochastic Gradient Descent (SGD), Stochastic Optimization Descent with Momentum, Rung Kutta, Adaptive Learning Rate, Root Mean Square Propagation, Adaptive Moment Estimation, Deep Ensembles, Feedback Alignment, Direct Feedback Alignment, Adfactor, AMSGrad, and Gravity. prove the ability of each optimizer applied to machine learning models. Firstly, tests on a skin cancer using the ISIC standard dataset for skin cancer detection were applied using three common optimizers (Adaptive Moment, SGD, and Root Mean Square Propagation) to explore the effect of the algorithms on the skin images. The optimal training results from the analysis indicate that the performance values are enhanced using the Adam optimizer, which achieved 97.30% accuracy. The second dataset is COVIDx CT images, and the results achieved are 99.07% accuracy based on the Adam optimizer. The result indicated that the utilisation of optimizers such as SGD and Adam improved the accuracy in training, testing, and validation stages.</abstract><cop>New York</cop><pub>Springer US</pub><pmid>36185324</pmid><doi>10.1007/s11042-022-13820-0</doi><tpages>43</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5732-6322</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1380-7501
ispartof Multimedia tools and applications, 2023-05, Vol.82 (11), p.16591-16633
issn 1380-7501
1573-7721
language eng
recordid cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_9514986
source SpringerLink Journals
subjects Accuracy
Algorithms
Alignment
Cancer
Comparative studies
Computed tomography
Computer Communication Networks
Computer Science
Computer vision
Data Structures and Information Theory
Datasets
Feedback
Machine learning
Medical imaging
Model accuracy
Multimedia Information Systems
Optimization
Optimization techniques
Propagation
Skin cancer
Special Purpose and Application-Based Systems
Training
title The effect of choosing optimizer algorithms to improve computer vision tasks: a comparative study
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-25T20%3A47%3A45IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=The%20effect%20of%20choosing%20optimizer%20algorithms%20to%20improve%20computer%20vision%20tasks:%20a%20comparative%20study&rft.jtitle=Multimedia%20tools%20and%20applications&rft.au=Hassan,%20Esraa&rft.date=2023-05-01&rft.volume=82&rft.issue=11&rft.spage=16591&rft.epage=16633&rft.pages=16591-16633&rft.issn=1380-7501&rft.eissn=1573-7721&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s11042-022-13820-0&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E2720925524%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2801404367&rft_id=info:pmid/36185324&rfr_iscdi=true