The effect of choosing optimizer algorithms to improve computer vision tasks: a comparative study
Optimization algorithms are used to improve model accuracy. The optimization process undergoes multiple cycles until convergence. A variety of optimization strategies have been developed to overcome the obstacles involved in the learning process. Some of these strategies have been considered in this...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Multimedia tools and applications 2023-05, Vol.82 (11), p.16591-16633 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 16633 |
---|---|
container_issue | 11 |
container_start_page | 16591 |
container_title | Multimedia tools and applications |
container_volume | 82 |
creator | Hassan, Esraa Shams, Mahmoud Y. Hikal, Noha A. Elmougy, Samir |
description | Optimization algorithms are used to improve model accuracy. The optimization process undergoes multiple cycles until convergence. A variety of optimization strategies have been developed to overcome the obstacles involved in the learning process. Some of these strategies have been considered in this study to learn more about their complexities. It is crucial to analyse and summarise optimization techniques methodically from a machine learning standpoint since this can provide direction for future work in both machine learning and optimization. The approaches under consideration include the Stochastic Gradient Descent (SGD), Stochastic Optimization Descent with Momentum, Rung Kutta, Adaptive Learning Rate, Root Mean Square Propagation, Adaptive Moment Estimation, Deep Ensembles, Feedback Alignment, Direct Feedback Alignment, Adfactor, AMSGrad, and Gravity. prove the ability of each optimizer applied to machine learning models. Firstly, tests on a skin cancer using the ISIC standard dataset for skin cancer detection were applied using three common optimizers (Adaptive Moment, SGD, and Root Mean Square Propagation) to explore the effect of the algorithms on the skin images. The optimal training results from the analysis indicate that the performance values are enhanced using the Adam optimizer, which achieved 97.30% accuracy. The second dataset is COVIDx CT images, and the results achieved are 99.07% accuracy based on the Adam optimizer. The result indicated that the utilisation of optimizers such as SGD and Adam improved the accuracy in training, testing, and validation stages. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1007/s11042-022-13820-0 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_9514986</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2720925524</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c474t-cbb492b064f6d4f6dfc00202c94298d5438a3f7822124af03e9b3a50614319753</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kU1vFSEUhonR2A_9Ay4MiRs3o4cDDDMuTJrGqkkTN3VNGC7cS50ZRmBuUn-9tLfWj4ULckje57xwzkvICwZvGIB6mxkDgQ0gNox3CA08IsdMKt4ohexxvfMOGiWBHZGTnK8BWCtRPCVHvGWd5CiOibnaOeq8d7bQ6KndxZjDvKVxKWEKP1yiZtzGFMpuyrREGqYlxb2jNk7LWqq8DznEmRaTv-V31NwJJpkSKpTLurl5Rp54M2b3_L6ekq8XH67OPzWXXz5-Pj-7bKxQojR2GESPA7TCt5vb4y0AAtpeYN9tpOCd4V51iAyF8cBdP3AjoWWCs15JfkreH3yXdZjcxrq5JDPqJYXJpBsdTdB_K3PY6W3c614y0XdtNXh9b5Di99XloqeQrRtHM7u4Zo0KoUdZN1jRV_-g13FNcx1PYwdMgOCtqhQeKJtizsn5h88w0LcJ6kOCuiao7xLUUJte_jnGQ8uvyCrAD0Cu0rx16ffb_7H9Ce_0p08</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2801404367</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>The effect of choosing optimizer algorithms to improve computer vision tasks: a comparative study</title><source>SpringerLink Journals</source><creator>Hassan, Esraa ; Shams, Mahmoud Y. ; Hikal, Noha A. ; Elmougy, Samir</creator><creatorcontrib>Hassan, Esraa ; Shams, Mahmoud Y. ; Hikal, Noha A. ; Elmougy, Samir</creatorcontrib><description>Optimization algorithms are used to improve model accuracy. The optimization process undergoes multiple cycles until convergence. A variety of optimization strategies have been developed to overcome the obstacles involved in the learning process. Some of these strategies have been considered in this study to learn more about their complexities. It is crucial to analyse and summarise optimization techniques methodically from a machine learning standpoint since this can provide direction for future work in both machine learning and optimization. The approaches under consideration include the Stochastic Gradient Descent (SGD), Stochastic Optimization Descent with Momentum, Rung Kutta, Adaptive Learning Rate, Root Mean Square Propagation, Adaptive Moment Estimation, Deep Ensembles, Feedback Alignment, Direct Feedback Alignment, Adfactor, AMSGrad, and Gravity. prove the ability of each optimizer applied to machine learning models. Firstly, tests on a skin cancer using the ISIC standard dataset for skin cancer detection were applied using three common optimizers (Adaptive Moment, SGD, and Root Mean Square Propagation) to explore the effect of the algorithms on the skin images. The optimal training results from the analysis indicate that the performance values are enhanced using the Adam optimizer, which achieved 97.30% accuracy. The second dataset is COVIDx CT images, and the results achieved are 99.07% accuracy based on the Adam optimizer. The result indicated that the utilisation of optimizers such as SGD and Adam improved the accuracy in training, testing, and validation stages.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1380-7501</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1573-7721</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s11042-022-13820-0</identifier><identifier>PMID: 36185324</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>New York: Springer US</publisher><subject>Accuracy ; Algorithms ; Alignment ; Cancer ; Comparative studies ; Computed tomography ; Computer Communication Networks ; Computer Science ; Computer vision ; Data Structures and Information Theory ; Datasets ; Feedback ; Machine learning ; Medical imaging ; Model accuracy ; Multimedia Information Systems ; Optimization ; Optimization techniques ; Propagation ; Skin cancer ; Special Purpose and Application-Based Systems ; Training</subject><ispartof>Multimedia tools and applications, 2023-05, Vol.82 (11), p.16591-16633</ispartof><rights>The Author(s) 2022</rights><rights>The Author(s) 2022.</rights><rights>The Author(s) 2022. This work is published under http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c474t-cbb492b064f6d4f6dfc00202c94298d5438a3f7822124af03e9b3a50614319753</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c474t-cbb492b064f6d4f6dfc00202c94298d5438a3f7822124af03e9b3a50614319753</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-5732-6322</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s11042-022-13820-0$$EPDF$$P50$$Gspringer$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/10.1007/s11042-022-13820-0$$EHTML$$P50$$Gspringer$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,776,780,881,27903,27904,41467,42536,51297</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36185324$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Hassan, Esraa</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Shams, Mahmoud Y.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hikal, Noha A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Elmougy, Samir</creatorcontrib><title>The effect of choosing optimizer algorithms to improve computer vision tasks: a comparative study</title><title>Multimedia tools and applications</title><addtitle>Multimed Tools Appl</addtitle><addtitle>Multimed Tools Appl</addtitle><description>Optimization algorithms are used to improve model accuracy. The optimization process undergoes multiple cycles until convergence. A variety of optimization strategies have been developed to overcome the obstacles involved in the learning process. Some of these strategies have been considered in this study to learn more about their complexities. It is crucial to analyse and summarise optimization techniques methodically from a machine learning standpoint since this can provide direction for future work in both machine learning and optimization. The approaches under consideration include the Stochastic Gradient Descent (SGD), Stochastic Optimization Descent with Momentum, Rung Kutta, Adaptive Learning Rate, Root Mean Square Propagation, Adaptive Moment Estimation, Deep Ensembles, Feedback Alignment, Direct Feedback Alignment, Adfactor, AMSGrad, and Gravity. prove the ability of each optimizer applied to machine learning models. Firstly, tests on a skin cancer using the ISIC standard dataset for skin cancer detection were applied using three common optimizers (Adaptive Moment, SGD, and Root Mean Square Propagation) to explore the effect of the algorithms on the skin images. The optimal training results from the analysis indicate that the performance values are enhanced using the Adam optimizer, which achieved 97.30% accuracy. The second dataset is COVIDx CT images, and the results achieved are 99.07% accuracy based on the Adam optimizer. The result indicated that the utilisation of optimizers such as SGD and Adam improved the accuracy in training, testing, and validation stages.</description><subject>Accuracy</subject><subject>Algorithms</subject><subject>Alignment</subject><subject>Cancer</subject><subject>Comparative studies</subject><subject>Computed tomography</subject><subject>Computer Communication Networks</subject><subject>Computer Science</subject><subject>Computer vision</subject><subject>Data Structures and Information Theory</subject><subject>Datasets</subject><subject>Feedback</subject><subject>Machine learning</subject><subject>Medical imaging</subject><subject>Model accuracy</subject><subject>Multimedia Information Systems</subject><subject>Optimization</subject><subject>Optimization techniques</subject><subject>Propagation</subject><subject>Skin cancer</subject><subject>Special Purpose and Application-Based Systems</subject><subject>Training</subject><issn>1380-7501</issn><issn>1573-7721</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2023</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>C6C</sourceid><sourceid>8G5</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><sourceid>GUQSH</sourceid><sourceid>M2O</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kU1vFSEUhonR2A_9Ay4MiRs3o4cDDDMuTJrGqkkTN3VNGC7cS50ZRmBuUn-9tLfWj4ULckje57xwzkvICwZvGIB6mxkDgQ0gNox3CA08IsdMKt4ohexxvfMOGiWBHZGTnK8BWCtRPCVHvGWd5CiOibnaOeq8d7bQ6KndxZjDvKVxKWEKP1yiZtzGFMpuyrREGqYlxb2jNk7LWqq8DznEmRaTv-V31NwJJpkSKpTLurl5Rp54M2b3_L6ekq8XH67OPzWXXz5-Pj-7bKxQojR2GESPA7TCt5vb4y0AAtpeYN9tpOCd4V51iAyF8cBdP3AjoWWCs15JfkreH3yXdZjcxrq5JDPqJYXJpBsdTdB_K3PY6W3c614y0XdtNXh9b5Di99XloqeQrRtHM7u4Zo0KoUdZN1jRV_-g13FNcx1PYwdMgOCtqhQeKJtizsn5h88w0LcJ6kOCuiao7xLUUJte_jnGQ8uvyCrAD0Cu0rx16ffb_7H9Ce_0p08</recordid><startdate>20230501</startdate><enddate>20230501</enddate><creator>Hassan, Esraa</creator><creator>Shams, Mahmoud Y.</creator><creator>Hikal, Noha A.</creator><creator>Elmougy, Samir</creator><general>Springer US</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>C6C</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7SC</scope><scope>7WY</scope><scope>7WZ</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>87Z</scope><scope>8AL</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FG</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8FL</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ARAPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BEZIV</scope><scope>BGLVJ</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FRNLG</scope><scope>F~G</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>JQ2</scope><scope>K60</scope><scope>K6~</scope><scope>K7-</scope><scope>L.-</scope><scope>L7M</scope><scope>L~C</scope><scope>L~D</scope><scope>M0C</scope><scope>M0N</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>P5Z</scope><scope>P62</scope><scope>PQBIZ</scope><scope>PQBZA</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5732-6322</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20230501</creationdate><title>The effect of choosing optimizer algorithms to improve computer vision tasks: a comparative study</title><author>Hassan, Esraa ; Shams, Mahmoud Y. ; Hikal, Noha A. ; Elmougy, Samir</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c474t-cbb492b064f6d4f6dfc00202c94298d5438a3f7822124af03e9b3a50614319753</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2023</creationdate><topic>Accuracy</topic><topic>Algorithms</topic><topic>Alignment</topic><topic>Cancer</topic><topic>Comparative studies</topic><topic>Computed tomography</topic><topic>Computer Communication Networks</topic><topic>Computer Science</topic><topic>Computer vision</topic><topic>Data Structures and Information Theory</topic><topic>Datasets</topic><topic>Feedback</topic><topic>Machine learning</topic><topic>Medical imaging</topic><topic>Model accuracy</topic><topic>Multimedia Information Systems</topic><topic>Optimization</topic><topic>Optimization techniques</topic><topic>Propagation</topic><topic>Skin cancer</topic><topic>Special Purpose and Application-Based Systems</topic><topic>Training</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Hassan, Esraa</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Shams, Mahmoud Y.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hikal, Noha A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Elmougy, Samir</creatorcontrib><collection>Springer Nature OA Free Journals</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Computer and Information Systems Abstracts</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (PDF only)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Computing Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies & Aerospace Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Business Premium Collection</collection><collection>Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Business Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (Corporate)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Computer Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection</collection><collection>Computer Science Database</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Professional Advanced</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies Database with Aerospace</collection><collection>Computer and Information Systems Abstracts Academic</collection><collection>Computer and Information Systems Abstracts Professional</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global</collection><collection>Computing Database</collection><collection>Research Library</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies & Aerospace Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Advanced Technologies & Aerospace Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Business</collection><collection>ProQuest One Business (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>Multimedia tools and applications</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Hassan, Esraa</au><au>Shams, Mahmoud Y.</au><au>Hikal, Noha A.</au><au>Elmougy, Samir</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>The effect of choosing optimizer algorithms to improve computer vision tasks: a comparative study</atitle><jtitle>Multimedia tools and applications</jtitle><stitle>Multimed Tools Appl</stitle><addtitle>Multimed Tools Appl</addtitle><date>2023-05-01</date><risdate>2023</risdate><volume>82</volume><issue>11</issue><spage>16591</spage><epage>16633</epage><pages>16591-16633</pages><issn>1380-7501</issn><eissn>1573-7721</eissn><abstract>Optimization algorithms are used to improve model accuracy. The optimization process undergoes multiple cycles until convergence. A variety of optimization strategies have been developed to overcome the obstacles involved in the learning process. Some of these strategies have been considered in this study to learn more about their complexities. It is crucial to analyse and summarise optimization techniques methodically from a machine learning standpoint since this can provide direction for future work in both machine learning and optimization. The approaches under consideration include the Stochastic Gradient Descent (SGD), Stochastic Optimization Descent with Momentum, Rung Kutta, Adaptive Learning Rate, Root Mean Square Propagation, Adaptive Moment Estimation, Deep Ensembles, Feedback Alignment, Direct Feedback Alignment, Adfactor, AMSGrad, and Gravity. prove the ability of each optimizer applied to machine learning models. Firstly, tests on a skin cancer using the ISIC standard dataset for skin cancer detection were applied using three common optimizers (Adaptive Moment, SGD, and Root Mean Square Propagation) to explore the effect of the algorithms on the skin images. The optimal training results from the analysis indicate that the performance values are enhanced using the Adam optimizer, which achieved 97.30% accuracy. The second dataset is COVIDx CT images, and the results achieved are 99.07% accuracy based on the Adam optimizer. The result indicated that the utilisation of optimizers such as SGD and Adam improved the accuracy in training, testing, and validation stages.</abstract><cop>New York</cop><pub>Springer US</pub><pmid>36185324</pmid><doi>10.1007/s11042-022-13820-0</doi><tpages>43</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5732-6322</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1380-7501 |
ispartof | Multimedia tools and applications, 2023-05, Vol.82 (11), p.16591-16633 |
issn | 1380-7501 1573-7721 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_9514986 |
source | SpringerLink Journals |
subjects | Accuracy Algorithms Alignment Cancer Comparative studies Computed tomography Computer Communication Networks Computer Science Computer vision Data Structures and Information Theory Datasets Feedback Machine learning Medical imaging Model accuracy Multimedia Information Systems Optimization Optimization techniques Propagation Skin cancer Special Purpose and Application-Based Systems Training |
title | The effect of choosing optimizer algorithms to improve computer vision tasks: a comparative study |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-25T20%3A47%3A45IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=The%20effect%20of%20choosing%20optimizer%20algorithms%20to%20improve%20computer%20vision%20tasks:%20a%20comparative%20study&rft.jtitle=Multimedia%20tools%20and%20applications&rft.au=Hassan,%20Esraa&rft.date=2023-05-01&rft.volume=82&rft.issue=11&rft.spage=16591&rft.epage=16633&rft.pages=16591-16633&rft.issn=1380-7501&rft.eissn=1573-7721&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s11042-022-13820-0&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E2720925524%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2801404367&rft_id=info:pmid/36185324&rfr_iscdi=true |