Dissociating sub-processes of aftereffects of completed intentions and costs to the ongoing task in prospective memory: A mouse-tracking approach

In the present study, we used mouse tracking to investigate two processes underlying prospective memory (PM) retrieval: First, we aimed to explore to what extent spontaneous retrieval of already completed PM intentions is supported by reflexive-associative and discrepancy-plus-search processes. Seco...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Memory & cognition 2022-10, Vol.50 (7), p.1590-1613
Hauptverfasser: Kurtz, Marcel, Scherbaum, Stefan, Walser, Moritz, Kanske, Philipp, Möschl, Marcus
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 1613
container_issue 7
container_start_page 1590
container_title Memory & cognition
container_volume 50
creator Kurtz, Marcel
Scherbaum, Stefan
Walser, Moritz
Kanske, Philipp
Möschl, Marcus
description In the present study, we used mouse tracking to investigate two processes underlying prospective memory (PM) retrieval: First, we aimed to explore to what extent spontaneous retrieval of already completed PM intentions is supported by reflexive-associative and discrepancy-plus-search processes. Second, we aimed to disentangle whether costs to an ongoing task during the pursuit of a PM intention are associated with presumably resource-demanding monitoring processes or with a presumably resource-sparing strategic delay of ongoing-task responses. Our third aim was to explore the interaction of processes underlying costs to the ongoing task and processes of spontaneous retrieval. Our analyses replicated response-time patterns from previous studies indicating aftereffects of completed intentions and costs to ongoing-task performance, as well as increased aftereffects while pursuing a PM intention. Notably, based on our mouse-tracking analyses, we argue that aftereffects of completed intentions are best explained by a reflexive initiation of an already completed intention. If the completed intention is not performed in its entirety (i.e., no commission error), the reflexive initiation of the completed intention is followed by a subsequent movement correction that most likely represents a time-consuming response-verification process. Regarding performance costs in the ongoing task, our analyses suggest that actively pursuing a PM intention most likely leads to a strategic delay of ongoing activities. Lastly, we found that pursuing a novel PM task after intention completion exacerbated orienting responses to all deviant stimuli, exacerbated the readiness to initiate the completed intention reflexively, and substantially prolonged the response-verification process following this reflexive intention retrieval.
doi_str_mv 10.3758/s13421-022-01289-z
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_9508066</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2718387412</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c479t-8a651b24b79bd9a4979e35220d68ab0452df1f3b6912eac75fb073052a87fee43</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kUtv1DAUhS0EokPhD7BAltiwMfgRJzELpKo8pUpsQGJnOc7NjNvEDrFTqf0X_GPudEp5LFhZ1vnusc89hDwV_KVqdPsqC1VJwbiUjAvZGnZ9j2yEVpJpU9X3yYZzw5nm8tsReZTzOedca1M_JEdKSyFNYzbkx9uQc_LBlRC3NK8dm5fkIWfINA3UDQUWGAbw5ebu0zSPUKCnIRaIJaSYqYs9ChmJkmjZAU1xm_Z2xeULBCla5hktwiXQCaa0XL2mJ3RKawZWFucv9rCbEXN-95g8GNyY4cnteUy-vn_35fQjO_v84dPpyRnzVWMKa12tRSerrjFdb1yFaQBjSd7Xret4pWU_iEF1tRESnG_00PFGcS1d2wwAlTombw6-89pN0HtMs7jRzkuY3HJlkwv2byWGnd2mS2s0b3ldo8GLW4MlfV8hFzuF7GEcXQSMZmWtlJGirQSiz_9Bz9O6RIxnZSNa1TaVkEjJA-VxXxnXfvcZwe2-cXto3GLj9qZxe41Dz_6McTfyq2IE1AHIKMUtLL_f_o_tTx9tu4I</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2718387412</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Dissociating sub-processes of aftereffects of completed intentions and costs to the ongoing task in prospective memory: A mouse-tracking approach</title><source>SpringerLink (Online service)</source><source>EBSCOhost Business Source Complete</source><creator>Kurtz, Marcel ; Scherbaum, Stefan ; Walser, Moritz ; Kanske, Philipp ; Möschl, Marcus</creator><creatorcontrib>Kurtz, Marcel ; Scherbaum, Stefan ; Walser, Moritz ; Kanske, Philipp ; Möschl, Marcus</creatorcontrib><description>In the present study, we used mouse tracking to investigate two processes underlying prospective memory (PM) retrieval: First, we aimed to explore to what extent spontaneous retrieval of already completed PM intentions is supported by reflexive-associative and discrepancy-plus-search processes. Second, we aimed to disentangle whether costs to an ongoing task during the pursuit of a PM intention are associated with presumably resource-demanding monitoring processes or with a presumably resource-sparing strategic delay of ongoing-task responses. Our third aim was to explore the interaction of processes underlying costs to the ongoing task and processes of spontaneous retrieval. Our analyses replicated response-time patterns from previous studies indicating aftereffects of completed intentions and costs to ongoing-task performance, as well as increased aftereffects while pursuing a PM intention. Notably, based on our mouse-tracking analyses, we argue that aftereffects of completed intentions are best explained by a reflexive initiation of an already completed intention. If the completed intention is not performed in its entirety (i.e., no commission error), the reflexive initiation of the completed intention is followed by a subsequent movement correction that most likely represents a time-consuming response-verification process. Regarding performance costs in the ongoing task, our analyses suggest that actively pursuing a PM intention most likely leads to a strategic delay of ongoing activities. Lastly, we found that pursuing a novel PM task after intention completion exacerbated orienting responses to all deviant stimuli, exacerbated the readiness to initiate the completed intention reflexively, and substantially prolonged the response-verification process following this reflexive intention retrieval.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0090-502X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1532-5946</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.3758/s13421-022-01289-z</identifier><identifier>PMID: 35212979</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>New York: Springer US</publisher><subject>Behavioral Science and Psychology ; Cognitive Psychology ; Memory ; Mental task performance ; Psychology</subject><ispartof>Memory &amp; cognition, 2022-10, Vol.50 (7), p.1590-1613</ispartof><rights>The Author(s) 2022</rights><rights>2022. The Author(s).</rights><rights>Copyright Springer Nature B.V. Oct 2022</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c479t-8a651b24b79bd9a4979e35220d68ab0452df1f3b6912eac75fb073052a87fee43</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-2244-6025</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.3758/s13421-022-01289-z$$EPDF$$P50$$Gspringer$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/10.3758/s13421-022-01289-z$$EHTML$$P50$$Gspringer$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,780,784,885,27924,27925,41488,42557,51319</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35212979$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Kurtz, Marcel</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Scherbaum, Stefan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Walser, Moritz</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kanske, Philipp</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Möschl, Marcus</creatorcontrib><title>Dissociating sub-processes of aftereffects of completed intentions and costs to the ongoing task in prospective memory: A mouse-tracking approach</title><title>Memory &amp; cognition</title><addtitle>Mem Cogn</addtitle><addtitle>Mem Cognit</addtitle><description>In the present study, we used mouse tracking to investigate two processes underlying prospective memory (PM) retrieval: First, we aimed to explore to what extent spontaneous retrieval of already completed PM intentions is supported by reflexive-associative and discrepancy-plus-search processes. Second, we aimed to disentangle whether costs to an ongoing task during the pursuit of a PM intention are associated with presumably resource-demanding monitoring processes or with a presumably resource-sparing strategic delay of ongoing-task responses. Our third aim was to explore the interaction of processes underlying costs to the ongoing task and processes of spontaneous retrieval. Our analyses replicated response-time patterns from previous studies indicating aftereffects of completed intentions and costs to ongoing-task performance, as well as increased aftereffects while pursuing a PM intention. Notably, based on our mouse-tracking analyses, we argue that aftereffects of completed intentions are best explained by a reflexive initiation of an already completed intention. If the completed intention is not performed in its entirety (i.e., no commission error), the reflexive initiation of the completed intention is followed by a subsequent movement correction that most likely represents a time-consuming response-verification process. Regarding performance costs in the ongoing task, our analyses suggest that actively pursuing a PM intention most likely leads to a strategic delay of ongoing activities. Lastly, we found that pursuing a novel PM task after intention completion exacerbated orienting responses to all deviant stimuli, exacerbated the readiness to initiate the completed intention reflexively, and substantially prolonged the response-verification process following this reflexive intention retrieval.</description><subject>Behavioral Science and Psychology</subject><subject>Cognitive Psychology</subject><subject>Memory</subject><subject>Mental task performance</subject><subject>Psychology</subject><issn>0090-502X</issn><issn>1532-5946</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2022</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>C6C</sourceid><sourceid>8G5</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><sourceid>GUQSH</sourceid><sourceid>M2O</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kUtv1DAUhS0EokPhD7BAltiwMfgRJzELpKo8pUpsQGJnOc7NjNvEDrFTqf0X_GPudEp5LFhZ1vnusc89hDwV_KVqdPsqC1VJwbiUjAvZGnZ9j2yEVpJpU9X3yYZzw5nm8tsReZTzOedca1M_JEdKSyFNYzbkx9uQc_LBlRC3NK8dm5fkIWfINA3UDQUWGAbw5ebu0zSPUKCnIRaIJaSYqYs9ChmJkmjZAU1xm_Z2xeULBCla5hktwiXQCaa0XL2mJ3RKawZWFucv9rCbEXN-95g8GNyY4cnteUy-vn_35fQjO_v84dPpyRnzVWMKa12tRSerrjFdb1yFaQBjSd7Xret4pWU_iEF1tRESnG_00PFGcS1d2wwAlTombw6-89pN0HtMs7jRzkuY3HJlkwv2byWGnd2mS2s0b3ldo8GLW4MlfV8hFzuF7GEcXQSMZmWtlJGirQSiz_9Bz9O6RIxnZSNa1TaVkEjJA-VxXxnXfvcZwe2-cXto3GLj9qZxe41Dz_6McTfyq2IE1AHIKMUtLL_f_o_tTx9tu4I</recordid><startdate>20221001</startdate><enddate>20221001</enddate><creator>Kurtz, Marcel</creator><creator>Scherbaum, Stefan</creator><creator>Walser, Moritz</creator><creator>Kanske, Philipp</creator><creator>Möschl, Marcus</creator><general>Springer US</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>C6C</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>0-V</scope><scope>0U~</scope><scope>1-H</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7QG</scope><scope>7RV</scope><scope>7TK</scope><scope>7WY</scope><scope>7WZ</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>87Z</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>88G</scope><scope>88J</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8FL</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ALSLI</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BEZIV</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FRNLG</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>F~G</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>K60</scope><scope>K6~</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>KB0</scope><scope>L.-</scope><scope>L.0</scope><scope>M0C</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M2M</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>M2R</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>PQBIZ</scope><scope>PQBZA</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>PSYQQ</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2244-6025</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20221001</creationdate><title>Dissociating sub-processes of aftereffects of completed intentions and costs to the ongoing task in prospective memory: A mouse-tracking approach</title><author>Kurtz, Marcel ; Scherbaum, Stefan ; Walser, Moritz ; Kanske, Philipp ; Möschl, Marcus</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c479t-8a651b24b79bd9a4979e35220d68ab0452df1f3b6912eac75fb073052a87fee43</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2022</creationdate><topic>Behavioral Science and Psychology</topic><topic>Cognitive Psychology</topic><topic>Memory</topic><topic>Mental task performance</topic><topic>Psychology</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Kurtz, Marcel</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Scherbaum, Stefan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Walser, Moritz</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kanske, Philipp</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Möschl, Marcus</creatorcontrib><collection>Springer Nature OA Free Journals</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Social Sciences Premium Collection【Remote access available】</collection><collection>Global News &amp; ABI/Inform Professional</collection><collection>Trade PRO</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Animal Behavior Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest Nursing and Allied Health Journals</collection><collection>Neurosciences Abstracts</collection><collection>ABI商业信息数据库</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (PDF only)</collection><collection>ProQuest Health and Medical</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Psychology Database (Alumni)</collection><collection>Social Science Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Social Science Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Business Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (Corporate)</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Professional Advanced</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Professional Standard</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>PML(ProQuest Medical Library)</collection><collection>ProQuest Psychology Journals</collection><collection>ProQuest research library</collection><collection>Social Science Database</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>One Business (ProQuest)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Business (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>ProQuest One Psychology</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>Memory &amp; cognition</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Kurtz, Marcel</au><au>Scherbaum, Stefan</au><au>Walser, Moritz</au><au>Kanske, Philipp</au><au>Möschl, Marcus</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Dissociating sub-processes of aftereffects of completed intentions and costs to the ongoing task in prospective memory: A mouse-tracking approach</atitle><jtitle>Memory &amp; cognition</jtitle><stitle>Mem Cogn</stitle><addtitle>Mem Cognit</addtitle><date>2022-10-01</date><risdate>2022</risdate><volume>50</volume><issue>7</issue><spage>1590</spage><epage>1613</epage><pages>1590-1613</pages><issn>0090-502X</issn><eissn>1532-5946</eissn><abstract>In the present study, we used mouse tracking to investigate two processes underlying prospective memory (PM) retrieval: First, we aimed to explore to what extent spontaneous retrieval of already completed PM intentions is supported by reflexive-associative and discrepancy-plus-search processes. Second, we aimed to disentangle whether costs to an ongoing task during the pursuit of a PM intention are associated with presumably resource-demanding monitoring processes or with a presumably resource-sparing strategic delay of ongoing-task responses. Our third aim was to explore the interaction of processes underlying costs to the ongoing task and processes of spontaneous retrieval. Our analyses replicated response-time patterns from previous studies indicating aftereffects of completed intentions and costs to ongoing-task performance, as well as increased aftereffects while pursuing a PM intention. Notably, based on our mouse-tracking analyses, we argue that aftereffects of completed intentions are best explained by a reflexive initiation of an already completed intention. If the completed intention is not performed in its entirety (i.e., no commission error), the reflexive initiation of the completed intention is followed by a subsequent movement correction that most likely represents a time-consuming response-verification process. Regarding performance costs in the ongoing task, our analyses suggest that actively pursuing a PM intention most likely leads to a strategic delay of ongoing activities. Lastly, we found that pursuing a novel PM task after intention completion exacerbated orienting responses to all deviant stimuli, exacerbated the readiness to initiate the completed intention reflexively, and substantially prolonged the response-verification process following this reflexive intention retrieval.</abstract><cop>New York</cop><pub>Springer US</pub><pmid>35212979</pmid><doi>10.3758/s13421-022-01289-z</doi><tpages>24</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2244-6025</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0090-502X
ispartof Memory & cognition, 2022-10, Vol.50 (7), p.1590-1613
issn 0090-502X
1532-5946
language eng
recordid cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_9508066
source SpringerLink (Online service); EBSCOhost Business Source Complete
subjects Behavioral Science and Psychology
Cognitive Psychology
Memory
Mental task performance
Psychology
title Dissociating sub-processes of aftereffects of completed intentions and costs to the ongoing task in prospective memory: A mouse-tracking approach
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-25T10%3A28%3A20IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Dissociating%20sub-processes%20of%20aftereffects%20of%20completed%20intentions%20and%20costs%20to%20the%20ongoing%20task%20in%20prospective%20memory:%20A%20mouse-tracking%20approach&rft.jtitle=Memory%20&%20cognition&rft.au=Kurtz,%20Marcel&rft.date=2022-10-01&rft.volume=50&rft.issue=7&rft.spage=1590&rft.epage=1613&rft.pages=1590-1613&rft.issn=0090-502X&rft.eissn=1532-5946&rft_id=info:doi/10.3758/s13421-022-01289-z&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E2718387412%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2718387412&rft_id=info:pmid/35212979&rfr_iscdi=true