369 Effect of Diet, Rumen Fermentation Parameters and Their Combination on Predicting Milk Production

The objective of this meta-analysis was to explore variability in milk production associated with rumen fermentation parameters and diet characteristics. Data were extracted from 138 journal articles and used to derive 6 models to predict MY. Each model considered a different set of independent vari...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of animal science 2022-09, Vol.100 (Supplement_3), p.177-178
Hauptverfasser: Sujani, Sathya, White, Robin R
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 178
container_issue Supplement_3
container_start_page 177
container_title Journal of animal science
container_volume 100
creator Sujani, Sathya
White, Robin R
description The objective of this meta-analysis was to explore variability in milk production associated with rumen fermentation parameters and diet characteristics. Data were extracted from 138 journal articles and used to derive 6 models to predict MY. Each model considered a different set of independent variables, including rumen fermentation parameters (R), diet (D) and their combination (R+D), with or without interactions with rumen pH. Rumen fermentation parameters included total volatile fatty acid (VFA) concentration, molar proportions of major and minor VFA, rumen pH and ammonia nitrogen, and diet variables included dry matter intake (DMI) dietary percentages of dry (DM) and organic matter (OM), crude protein, neutral (NDF) and acid detergent fiber (ADF), ether extract, and starch. Linear mixed-effects models weighted by the inverse of the standard error were employed. Models were compared based on concordance correlation coefficients after removing random study effects (CCC). The MY models using D, R, D+R and D*pH performed similarly with CCC values ranging from 0.63 to 0.65. Models including an interaction with rumen pH were superior at explaining variation within the data (CCC: 0.75 to 0.76). The Final model derived using D, consisted of DMI and ADF. Molar proportions of acetate and propionate and DMI were in the final model based on R. The interaction between starch and pH remained in the final D*pH model along with DMI, DM, NDF and pH. From these models, we can conclude that rumen pH is an important moderator explaining variability in the associations among diet, rumen VFA, and milk production.
doi_str_mv 10.1093/jas/skac247.327
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>pubmedcentral_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_9493550</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_9493550</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c1367-966bb8d07ef72c440a6c50054c39173ed25b28866baef7c51a937a7e603a60f83</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpVkE1LAzEQhoMoWKtnr_kBbpuPTbK5CFJbFSqK1HPIZmfbtN3dkmyF_ntTWgRPL8M88zI8CN1TMqJE8_HaxnHcWMdyNeJMXaABFUxknEp-iQaEMJoVBWXX6CbGNSGUCS0GCLjUeFrX4Hrc1fjZQ_-Av_YNtHgGIUVve9-1-NMG20APIWLbVnixAh_wpGtK356AIxOg8q737RK_--0mzV21d8ftLbqq7TbC3TmH6Hs2XUxes_nHy9vkaZ45yqXKtJRlWVREQa2Yy3NipROEiNxxTRWHiomSFUWibCKcoFZzZRVIwq0kdcGH6PHUu9uXDVQuvR_s1uyCb2w4mM5683_T-pVZdj9G55oLQVLB-FTgQhdjgPrvlhJz1GySZnPWbJJm_gvCsnOk</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>369 Effect of Diet, Rumen Fermentation Parameters and Their Combination on Predicting Milk Production</title><source>Oxford University Press Journals All Titles (1996-Current)</source><source>Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals</source><source>PubMed Central</source><creator>Sujani, Sathya ; White, Robin R</creator><creatorcontrib>Sujani, Sathya ; White, Robin R</creatorcontrib><description>The objective of this meta-analysis was to explore variability in milk production associated with rumen fermentation parameters and diet characteristics. Data were extracted from 138 journal articles and used to derive 6 models to predict MY. Each model considered a different set of independent variables, including rumen fermentation parameters (R), diet (D) and their combination (R+D), with or without interactions with rumen pH. Rumen fermentation parameters included total volatile fatty acid (VFA) concentration, molar proportions of major and minor VFA, rumen pH and ammonia nitrogen, and diet variables included dry matter intake (DMI) dietary percentages of dry (DM) and organic matter (OM), crude protein, neutral (NDF) and acid detergent fiber (ADF), ether extract, and starch. Linear mixed-effects models weighted by the inverse of the standard error were employed. Models were compared based on concordance correlation coefficients after removing random study effects (CCC). The MY models using D, R, D+R and D*pH performed similarly with CCC values ranging from 0.63 to 0.65. Models including an interaction with rumen pH were superior at explaining variation within the data (CCC: 0.75 to 0.76). The Final model derived using D, consisted of DMI and ADF. Molar proportions of acetate and propionate and DMI were in the final model based on R. The interaction between starch and pH remained in the final D*pH model along with DMI, DM, NDF and pH. From these models, we can conclude that rumen pH is an important moderator explaining variability in the associations among diet, rumen VFA, and milk production.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0021-8812</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1525-3163</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1093/jas/skac247.327</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>US: Oxford University Press</publisher><subject>Oral Presentations</subject><ispartof>Journal of animal science, 2022-09, Vol.100 (Supplement_3), p.177-178</ispartof><rights>The Author(s) 2022. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the American Society of Animal Science. All rights reserved. For permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oup.com. 2022</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9493550/pdf/$$EPDF$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9493550/$$EHTML$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,723,776,780,881,27901,27902,53766,53768</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Sujani, Sathya</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>White, Robin R</creatorcontrib><title>369 Effect of Diet, Rumen Fermentation Parameters and Their Combination on Predicting Milk Production</title><title>Journal of animal science</title><description>The objective of this meta-analysis was to explore variability in milk production associated with rumen fermentation parameters and diet characteristics. Data were extracted from 138 journal articles and used to derive 6 models to predict MY. Each model considered a different set of independent variables, including rumen fermentation parameters (R), diet (D) and their combination (R+D), with or without interactions with rumen pH. Rumen fermentation parameters included total volatile fatty acid (VFA) concentration, molar proportions of major and minor VFA, rumen pH and ammonia nitrogen, and diet variables included dry matter intake (DMI) dietary percentages of dry (DM) and organic matter (OM), crude protein, neutral (NDF) and acid detergent fiber (ADF), ether extract, and starch. Linear mixed-effects models weighted by the inverse of the standard error were employed. Models were compared based on concordance correlation coefficients after removing random study effects (CCC). The MY models using D, R, D+R and D*pH performed similarly with CCC values ranging from 0.63 to 0.65. Models including an interaction with rumen pH were superior at explaining variation within the data (CCC: 0.75 to 0.76). The Final model derived using D, consisted of DMI and ADF. Molar proportions of acetate and propionate and DMI were in the final model based on R. The interaction between starch and pH remained in the final D*pH model along with DMI, DM, NDF and pH. From these models, we can conclude that rumen pH is an important moderator explaining variability in the associations among diet, rumen VFA, and milk production.</description><subject>Oral Presentations</subject><issn>0021-8812</issn><issn>1525-3163</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2022</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNpVkE1LAzEQhoMoWKtnr_kBbpuPTbK5CFJbFSqK1HPIZmfbtN3dkmyF_ntTWgRPL8M88zI8CN1TMqJE8_HaxnHcWMdyNeJMXaABFUxknEp-iQaEMJoVBWXX6CbGNSGUCS0GCLjUeFrX4Hrc1fjZQ_-Av_YNtHgGIUVve9-1-NMG20APIWLbVnixAh_wpGtK356AIxOg8q737RK_--0mzV21d8ftLbqq7TbC3TmH6Hs2XUxes_nHy9vkaZ45yqXKtJRlWVREQa2Yy3NipROEiNxxTRWHiomSFUWibCKcoFZzZRVIwq0kdcGH6PHUu9uXDVQuvR_s1uyCb2w4mM5683_T-pVZdj9G55oLQVLB-FTgQhdjgPrvlhJz1GySZnPWbJJm_gvCsnOk</recordid><startdate>20220922</startdate><enddate>20220922</enddate><creator>Sujani, Sathya</creator><creator>White, Robin R</creator><general>Oxford University Press</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>5PM</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20220922</creationdate><title>369 Effect of Diet, Rumen Fermentation Parameters and Their Combination on Predicting Milk Production</title><author>Sujani, Sathya ; White, Robin R</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c1367-966bb8d07ef72c440a6c50054c39173ed25b28866baef7c51a937a7e603a60f83</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2022</creationdate><topic>Oral Presentations</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Sujani, Sathya</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>White, Robin R</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>Journal of animal science</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Sujani, Sathya</au><au>White, Robin R</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>369 Effect of Diet, Rumen Fermentation Parameters and Their Combination on Predicting Milk Production</atitle><jtitle>Journal of animal science</jtitle><date>2022-09-22</date><risdate>2022</risdate><volume>100</volume><issue>Supplement_3</issue><spage>177</spage><epage>178</epage><pages>177-178</pages><issn>0021-8812</issn><eissn>1525-3163</eissn><abstract>The objective of this meta-analysis was to explore variability in milk production associated with rumen fermentation parameters and diet characteristics. Data were extracted from 138 journal articles and used to derive 6 models to predict MY. Each model considered a different set of independent variables, including rumen fermentation parameters (R), diet (D) and their combination (R+D), with or without interactions with rumen pH. Rumen fermentation parameters included total volatile fatty acid (VFA) concentration, molar proportions of major and minor VFA, rumen pH and ammonia nitrogen, and diet variables included dry matter intake (DMI) dietary percentages of dry (DM) and organic matter (OM), crude protein, neutral (NDF) and acid detergent fiber (ADF), ether extract, and starch. Linear mixed-effects models weighted by the inverse of the standard error were employed. Models were compared based on concordance correlation coefficients after removing random study effects (CCC). The MY models using D, R, D+R and D*pH performed similarly with CCC values ranging from 0.63 to 0.65. Models including an interaction with rumen pH were superior at explaining variation within the data (CCC: 0.75 to 0.76). The Final model derived using D, consisted of DMI and ADF. Molar proportions of acetate and propionate and DMI were in the final model based on R. The interaction between starch and pH remained in the final D*pH model along with DMI, DM, NDF and pH. From these models, we can conclude that rumen pH is an important moderator explaining variability in the associations among diet, rumen VFA, and milk production.</abstract><cop>US</cop><pub>Oxford University Press</pub><doi>10.1093/jas/skac247.327</doi><tpages>2</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0021-8812
ispartof Journal of animal science, 2022-09, Vol.100 (Supplement_3), p.177-178
issn 0021-8812
1525-3163
language eng
recordid cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_9493550
source Oxford University Press Journals All Titles (1996-Current); Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals; PubMed Central
subjects Oral Presentations
title 369 Effect of Diet, Rumen Fermentation Parameters and Their Combination on Predicting Milk Production
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-01T20%3A31%3A09IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-pubmedcentral_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=369%20Effect%20of%20Diet,%20Rumen%20Fermentation%20Parameters%20and%20Their%20Combination%20on%20Predicting%20Milk%20Production&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20animal%20science&rft.au=Sujani,%20Sathya&rft.date=2022-09-22&rft.volume=100&rft.issue=Supplement_3&rft.spage=177&rft.epage=178&rft.pages=177-178&rft.issn=0021-8812&rft.eissn=1525-3163&rft_id=info:doi/10.1093/jas/skac247.327&rft_dat=%3Cpubmedcentral_cross%3Epubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_9493550%3C/pubmedcentral_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true