Accuracy and Reliability of Root Crack and Fracture Detection in Teeth Using Magnetic Resonance Imaging
Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) has the potential to aid in determining the presence and extent of cracks/fractures in teeth because of better contrast without ionizing radiation. The objectives were to develop MRI criteria for root crack/fracture identification and to establish reliability and acc...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Journal of endodontics 2019-06, Vol.45 (6), p.750-755.e2 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 755.e2 |
---|---|
container_issue | 6 |
container_start_page | 750 |
container_title | Journal of endodontics |
container_volume | 45 |
creator | Schuurmans, Tyler J. Nixdorf, Donald R. Idiyatullin, Djaudat S. Law, Alan S. Barsness, Brian D. Roach, Samantha H. Gaalaas, Laurence |
description | Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) has the potential to aid in determining the presence and extent of cracks/fractures in teeth because of better contrast without ionizing radiation. The objectives were to develop MRI criteria for root crack/fracture identification and to establish reliability and accuracy in their detection.
MRI-based criteria for crack/fracture appearance was developed by an MRI physicist and a panel of 6 dentists. Twenty-nine human adult teeth previously extracted after a clinical diagnosis of a root crack/fracture were frequency matched to 29 controls. Samples were scanned using an in vivo MRI protocol and the reference standard (ie, ex vivo limited field of view cone-beam computed tomographic [CBCT] imaging). A blinded, 4-member panel evaluated the images with a proportion randomly retested to establish intrarater reliability. Overall observer agreement, sensitivity, and specificity were computed for each imaging modality.
Subjectively, MRI has increased crack/fracture contrast and is less prone to artifacts from radiodense materials relative to CBCT imaging. Intrarater reliability for MRI was fair to excellent (κ = 0.38–1.00), and for CBCT imaging, it was moderate to excellent (κ = 0.66–1.00). Sensitivity for MRI was 0.59 (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.39-0.76; P = .46), and for CBCT imaging, it was 0.59 (95% CI, 0.59–0.76; P = .46). Specificity for MRI was 0.83 (95% CI, 0.64–0.94; P < .01), and for CBCT imaging, it was 0.90 (95% CI, 0.73–0.98; P < .01).
Despite advantages of increased contrast and the absence of artifacts from radiodense materials in MRI, comparable measures of sensitivity and specificity (to limited field of view CBCT imaging) suggest MRI quality improvements are needed, specifically in image acquisition and postprocessing parameters. Given the early stage of technology development, there may be a use for MRI in detecting cracks/fractures in teeth.
•Reliabilities for magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) were similar to cone-beam computed tomographic (CBCT) imaging when detecting cracks/fractures in teeth.•MRI and CBCT imaging had high specificity and moderate sensitivity for detecting tooth cracks/fractures.•MRI, which is free of ionizing radiation, may have a role in detecting tooth cracks/fractures. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1016/j.joen.2019.03.008 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_9488572</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0099239919302134</els_id><sourcerecordid>2232108236</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c521t-a64d7b698346796b4aec49be730414e55a91689f7945e61834f00eabdf397d4c3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kV9rFDEUxYModq1-AR8kj77MeDPJ_AmIULZWCy1CaZ9DJnNnmnU2qUmmsN_ebLeW9sWnGzi_e244h5CPDEoGrPmyKTceXVkBkyXwEqB7RVasa7uC17V4TVYAUhYVl_KIvItxA8Baztu35IgzqBsOsCLTiTFL0GZHtRvoFc5W93a2aUf9SK-8T3Sd1d8P6ll-pSUgPcWEJlnvqHX0GjHd0pto3UQv9eQwWZONonfaGaTnWz1l6T15M-o54ofHeUxuzr5fr38WF79-nK9PLgpTVywVuhFD2zey46JpZdMLjUbIHlsOggmsay1Z08mxlaLGhmVsBEDdDyOX7SAMPybfDr53S7_FwaBLQc_qLtitDjvltVUvFWdv1eTvlRRdV7dVNvj8aBD8nwVjUlsbDc6zduiXqKqKVwy6ijcZrQ6oCT7GgOPTGQZq35DaqH1Dat-QAq5yQ3np0_MPPq38qyQDXw8A5pjuLQYVjcUc5WBDTl0N3v7P_y-l_KML</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2232108236</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Accuracy and Reliability of Root Crack and Fracture Detection in Teeth Using Magnetic Resonance Imaging</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals</source><creator>Schuurmans, Tyler J. ; Nixdorf, Donald R. ; Idiyatullin, Djaudat S. ; Law, Alan S. ; Barsness, Brian D. ; Roach, Samantha H. ; Gaalaas, Laurence</creator><creatorcontrib>Schuurmans, Tyler J. ; Nixdorf, Donald R. ; Idiyatullin, Djaudat S. ; Law, Alan S. ; Barsness, Brian D. ; Roach, Samantha H. ; Gaalaas, Laurence</creatorcontrib><description>Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) has the potential to aid in determining the presence and extent of cracks/fractures in teeth because of better contrast without ionizing radiation. The objectives were to develop MRI criteria for root crack/fracture identification and to establish reliability and accuracy in their detection.
MRI-based criteria for crack/fracture appearance was developed by an MRI physicist and a panel of 6 dentists. Twenty-nine human adult teeth previously extracted after a clinical diagnosis of a root crack/fracture were frequency matched to 29 controls. Samples were scanned using an in vivo MRI protocol and the reference standard (ie, ex vivo limited field of view cone-beam computed tomographic [CBCT] imaging). A blinded, 4-member panel evaluated the images with a proportion randomly retested to establish intrarater reliability. Overall observer agreement, sensitivity, and specificity were computed for each imaging modality.
Subjectively, MRI has increased crack/fracture contrast and is less prone to artifacts from radiodense materials relative to CBCT imaging. Intrarater reliability for MRI was fair to excellent (κ = 0.38–1.00), and for CBCT imaging, it was moderate to excellent (κ = 0.66–1.00). Sensitivity for MRI was 0.59 (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.39-0.76; P = .46), and for CBCT imaging, it was 0.59 (95% CI, 0.59–0.76; P = .46). Specificity for MRI was 0.83 (95% CI, 0.64–0.94; P < .01), and for CBCT imaging, it was 0.90 (95% CI, 0.73–0.98; P < .01).
Despite advantages of increased contrast and the absence of artifacts from radiodense materials in MRI, comparable measures of sensitivity and specificity (to limited field of view CBCT imaging) suggest MRI quality improvements are needed, specifically in image acquisition and postprocessing parameters. Given the early stage of technology development, there may be a use for MRI in detecting cracks/fractures in teeth.
•Reliabilities for magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) were similar to cone-beam computed tomographic (CBCT) imaging when detecting cracks/fractures in teeth.•MRI and CBCT imaging had high specificity and moderate sensitivity for detecting tooth cracks/fractures.•MRI, which is free of ionizing radiation, may have a role in detecting tooth cracks/fractures.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0099-2399</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1878-3554</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.joen.2019.03.008</identifier><identifier>PMID: 31056300</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Elsevier Inc</publisher><subject>Adult ; Cone-Beam Computed Tomography ; diagnosis ; Humans ; Magnetic Resonance Imaging ; Reproducibility of Results ; sensitivity ; Sensitivity and Specificity ; specificity ; sweep imaging with Fourier transformation ; tooth ; Tooth Fractures - diagnostic imaging ; Tooth Root - diagnostic imaging</subject><ispartof>Journal of endodontics, 2019-06, Vol.45 (6), p.750-755.e2</ispartof><rights>2019 American Association of Endodontists</rights><rights>Copyright © 2019 American Association of Endodontists. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c521t-a64d7b698346796b4aec49be730414e55a91689f7945e61834f00eabdf397d4c3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c521t-a64d7b698346796b4aec49be730414e55a91689f7945e61834f00eabdf397d4c3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0099239919302134$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,776,780,881,3537,27901,27902,65306</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31056300$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Schuurmans, Tyler J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nixdorf, Donald R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Idiyatullin, Djaudat S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Law, Alan S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Barsness, Brian D.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Roach, Samantha H.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gaalaas, Laurence</creatorcontrib><title>Accuracy and Reliability of Root Crack and Fracture Detection in Teeth Using Magnetic Resonance Imaging</title><title>Journal of endodontics</title><addtitle>J Endod</addtitle><description>Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) has the potential to aid in determining the presence and extent of cracks/fractures in teeth because of better contrast without ionizing radiation. The objectives were to develop MRI criteria for root crack/fracture identification and to establish reliability and accuracy in their detection.
MRI-based criteria for crack/fracture appearance was developed by an MRI physicist and a panel of 6 dentists. Twenty-nine human adult teeth previously extracted after a clinical diagnosis of a root crack/fracture were frequency matched to 29 controls. Samples were scanned using an in vivo MRI protocol and the reference standard (ie, ex vivo limited field of view cone-beam computed tomographic [CBCT] imaging). A blinded, 4-member panel evaluated the images with a proportion randomly retested to establish intrarater reliability. Overall observer agreement, sensitivity, and specificity were computed for each imaging modality.
Subjectively, MRI has increased crack/fracture contrast and is less prone to artifacts from radiodense materials relative to CBCT imaging. Intrarater reliability for MRI was fair to excellent (κ = 0.38–1.00), and for CBCT imaging, it was moderate to excellent (κ = 0.66–1.00). Sensitivity for MRI was 0.59 (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.39-0.76; P = .46), and for CBCT imaging, it was 0.59 (95% CI, 0.59–0.76; P = .46). Specificity for MRI was 0.83 (95% CI, 0.64–0.94; P < .01), and for CBCT imaging, it was 0.90 (95% CI, 0.73–0.98; P < .01).
Despite advantages of increased contrast and the absence of artifacts from radiodense materials in MRI, comparable measures of sensitivity and specificity (to limited field of view CBCT imaging) suggest MRI quality improvements are needed, specifically in image acquisition and postprocessing parameters. Given the early stage of technology development, there may be a use for MRI in detecting cracks/fractures in teeth.
•Reliabilities for magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) were similar to cone-beam computed tomographic (CBCT) imaging when detecting cracks/fractures in teeth.•MRI and CBCT imaging had high specificity and moderate sensitivity for detecting tooth cracks/fractures.•MRI, which is free of ionizing radiation, may have a role in detecting tooth cracks/fractures.</description><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Cone-Beam Computed Tomography</subject><subject>diagnosis</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Magnetic Resonance Imaging</subject><subject>Reproducibility of Results</subject><subject>sensitivity</subject><subject>Sensitivity and Specificity</subject><subject>specificity</subject><subject>sweep imaging with Fourier transformation</subject><subject>tooth</subject><subject>Tooth Fractures - diagnostic imaging</subject><subject>Tooth Root - diagnostic imaging</subject><issn>0099-2399</issn><issn>1878-3554</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2019</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kV9rFDEUxYModq1-AR8kj77MeDPJ_AmIULZWCy1CaZ9DJnNnmnU2qUmmsN_ebLeW9sWnGzi_e244h5CPDEoGrPmyKTceXVkBkyXwEqB7RVasa7uC17V4TVYAUhYVl_KIvItxA8Baztu35IgzqBsOsCLTiTFL0GZHtRvoFc5W93a2aUf9SK-8T3Sd1d8P6ll-pSUgPcWEJlnvqHX0GjHd0pto3UQv9eQwWZONonfaGaTnWz1l6T15M-o54ofHeUxuzr5fr38WF79-nK9PLgpTVywVuhFD2zey46JpZdMLjUbIHlsOggmsay1Z08mxlaLGhmVsBEDdDyOX7SAMPybfDr53S7_FwaBLQc_qLtitDjvltVUvFWdv1eTvlRRdV7dVNvj8aBD8nwVjUlsbDc6zduiXqKqKVwy6ijcZrQ6oCT7GgOPTGQZq35DaqH1Dat-QAq5yQ3np0_MPPq38qyQDXw8A5pjuLQYVjcUc5WBDTl0N3v7P_y-l_KML</recordid><startdate>20190601</startdate><enddate>20190601</enddate><creator>Schuurmans, Tyler J.</creator><creator>Nixdorf, Donald R.</creator><creator>Idiyatullin, Djaudat S.</creator><creator>Law, Alan S.</creator><creator>Barsness, Brian D.</creator><creator>Roach, Samantha H.</creator><creator>Gaalaas, Laurence</creator><general>Elsevier Inc</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20190601</creationdate><title>Accuracy and Reliability of Root Crack and Fracture Detection in Teeth Using Magnetic Resonance Imaging</title><author>Schuurmans, Tyler J. ; Nixdorf, Donald R. ; Idiyatullin, Djaudat S. ; Law, Alan S. ; Barsness, Brian D. ; Roach, Samantha H. ; Gaalaas, Laurence</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c521t-a64d7b698346796b4aec49be730414e55a91689f7945e61834f00eabdf397d4c3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2019</creationdate><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Cone-Beam Computed Tomography</topic><topic>diagnosis</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Magnetic Resonance Imaging</topic><topic>Reproducibility of Results</topic><topic>sensitivity</topic><topic>Sensitivity and Specificity</topic><topic>specificity</topic><topic>sweep imaging with Fourier transformation</topic><topic>tooth</topic><topic>Tooth Fractures - diagnostic imaging</topic><topic>Tooth Root - diagnostic imaging</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Schuurmans, Tyler J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nixdorf, Donald R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Idiyatullin, Djaudat S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Law, Alan S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Barsness, Brian D.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Roach, Samantha H.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gaalaas, Laurence</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>Journal of endodontics</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Schuurmans, Tyler J.</au><au>Nixdorf, Donald R.</au><au>Idiyatullin, Djaudat S.</au><au>Law, Alan S.</au><au>Barsness, Brian D.</au><au>Roach, Samantha H.</au><au>Gaalaas, Laurence</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Accuracy and Reliability of Root Crack and Fracture Detection in Teeth Using Magnetic Resonance Imaging</atitle><jtitle>Journal of endodontics</jtitle><addtitle>J Endod</addtitle><date>2019-06-01</date><risdate>2019</risdate><volume>45</volume><issue>6</issue><spage>750</spage><epage>755.e2</epage><pages>750-755.e2</pages><issn>0099-2399</issn><eissn>1878-3554</eissn><abstract>Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) has the potential to aid in determining the presence and extent of cracks/fractures in teeth because of better contrast without ionizing radiation. The objectives were to develop MRI criteria for root crack/fracture identification and to establish reliability and accuracy in their detection.
MRI-based criteria for crack/fracture appearance was developed by an MRI physicist and a panel of 6 dentists. Twenty-nine human adult teeth previously extracted after a clinical diagnosis of a root crack/fracture were frequency matched to 29 controls. Samples were scanned using an in vivo MRI protocol and the reference standard (ie, ex vivo limited field of view cone-beam computed tomographic [CBCT] imaging). A blinded, 4-member panel evaluated the images with a proportion randomly retested to establish intrarater reliability. Overall observer agreement, sensitivity, and specificity were computed for each imaging modality.
Subjectively, MRI has increased crack/fracture contrast and is less prone to artifacts from radiodense materials relative to CBCT imaging. Intrarater reliability for MRI was fair to excellent (κ = 0.38–1.00), and for CBCT imaging, it was moderate to excellent (κ = 0.66–1.00). Sensitivity for MRI was 0.59 (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.39-0.76; P = .46), and for CBCT imaging, it was 0.59 (95% CI, 0.59–0.76; P = .46). Specificity for MRI was 0.83 (95% CI, 0.64–0.94; P < .01), and for CBCT imaging, it was 0.90 (95% CI, 0.73–0.98; P < .01).
Despite advantages of increased contrast and the absence of artifacts from radiodense materials in MRI, comparable measures of sensitivity and specificity (to limited field of view CBCT imaging) suggest MRI quality improvements are needed, specifically in image acquisition and postprocessing parameters. Given the early stage of technology development, there may be a use for MRI in detecting cracks/fractures in teeth.
•Reliabilities for magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) were similar to cone-beam computed tomographic (CBCT) imaging when detecting cracks/fractures in teeth.•MRI and CBCT imaging had high specificity and moderate sensitivity for detecting tooth cracks/fractures.•MRI, which is free of ionizing radiation, may have a role in detecting tooth cracks/fractures.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Elsevier Inc</pub><pmid>31056300</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.joen.2019.03.008</doi><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0099-2399 |
ispartof | Journal of endodontics, 2019-06, Vol.45 (6), p.750-755.e2 |
issn | 0099-2399 1878-3554 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_9488572 |
source | MEDLINE; Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals |
subjects | Adult Cone-Beam Computed Tomography diagnosis Humans Magnetic Resonance Imaging Reproducibility of Results sensitivity Sensitivity and Specificity specificity sweep imaging with Fourier transformation tooth Tooth Fractures - diagnostic imaging Tooth Root - diagnostic imaging |
title | Accuracy and Reliability of Root Crack and Fracture Detection in Teeth Using Magnetic Resonance Imaging |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-12T13%3A36%3A23IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Accuracy%20and%20Reliability%20of%20Root%20Crack%20and%20Fracture%20Detection%20in%20Teeth%20Using%20Magnetic%20Resonance%20Imaging&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20endodontics&rft.au=Schuurmans,%20Tyler%20J.&rft.date=2019-06-01&rft.volume=45&rft.issue=6&rft.spage=750&rft.epage=755.e2&rft.pages=750-755.e2&rft.issn=0099-2399&rft.eissn=1878-3554&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.joen.2019.03.008&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E2232108236%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2232108236&rft_id=info:pmid/31056300&rft_els_id=S0099239919302134&rfr_iscdi=true |