Safe implementation of hand held steerable laparoscopic instruments: a survey among EAES surgeons

The complexity of handheld steerable laparoscopic instruments (SLI) may impair the learning curve compared to conventional instruments when first utilized. This study aimed to provide the current state of interest in the use of SLI, the current use of these in daily practice and the type of training...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Updates in Surgery 2022-10, Vol.74 (5), p.1749-1754
Hauptverfasser: Hardon, S. F., Rahimi, A. M., Postema, R. R., Willuth, E., Mintz, Y., Arezzo, A., Dankelman, J., Nickel, F., Horeman, T.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 1754
container_issue 5
container_start_page 1749
container_title Updates in Surgery
container_volume 74
creator Hardon, S. F.
Rahimi, A. M.
Postema, R. R.
Willuth, E.
Mintz, Y.
Arezzo, A.
Dankelman, J.
Nickel, F.
Horeman, T.
description The complexity of handheld steerable laparoscopic instruments (SLI) may impair the learning curve compared to conventional instruments when first utilized. This study aimed to provide the current state of interest in the use of SLI, the current use of these in daily practice and the type of training which is conducted before using SLI in the operating room (OR) on real patients. An online survey was distributed by European Association of Endoscopic Surgery (EAES) Executive Office to all active members, between January 4th and February 3rd, 2020. The survey consisted of 14 questions regarding the usage and training of steerable laparoscopic instruments. A total of 83 members responded, coming from 33 different countries. Twenty three percent of the respondents using SLI, were using the instruments routinely and of these 21% had not received any formal training in advance of using the instruments in real patients. Of all responding EAES members, 41% considered the instruments to potentially compromise patient safety due to their complexity, learning curve and the inexperience of the surgeons. The respondents reported the three most important aspects of a possible steerable laparoscopic instruments training curriculum to be: hands-on training, safe tissue handling and suturing practice. Finally, a major part of the respondents consider force/pressure feedback data to be of significant importance for implementation of training and assessment of safe laparoscopic and robotic surgery. Training and assessment of skills regarding safe implementation of steerable laparoscopic instruments is lacking. The respondents stressed the need for specific hands-on training during which feedback and assessment of skills should be guaranteed before operating on real patients.
doi_str_mv 10.1007/s13304-022-01258-w
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>gale_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_9481478</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><galeid>A718026856</galeid><sourcerecordid>A718026856</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c490t-f5a3822154bb3e3383e4b2c1bf0b62393ff65d83e363a46f3481063a137b98de3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9UcFq3DAQFaWlCZv8QE869uJE0theuYfCErZNINBDUuhNyPbIqyBLrmQn5O-rjZdCL5VAMzzNewzvEfKJsyvO2PY6cQBWFkyIgnFRyeLlHTkXDGQBwMX7U8-B_zojlyk9sXygOb4fyRlUJa8rWZ0T_aANUjtODkf0s55t8DQYetC-pwd0PU0zYtStQ-r0pGNIXZhsR61Pc1yOnPSFapqW-IyvVI_BD3S_2z8ckQGDTxfkg9Eu4eWpbsjPb_vHm9vi_sf3u5vdfdGVDZsLU2mQQvCqbFtAAAlYtqLjrWFtLaABY-qqzyjUoMvaQCk5yy2HbdvIHmFDvq6609KO2Hd5s6idmqIddXxVQVv174-3BzWEZ9VkpXIrs8Dnk0AMvxdMsxpt6tA57TEsSYm6bJpGymzshlyto4N2qKw3ISt2-fY42i54NDbjuy2XTNSyqjNBrIQuG5gimr97caaOeao1T5XzVG95qpdMgpWU8rAfMKqnsESfTfwf6w_buaMR</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2649998820</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Safe implementation of hand held steerable laparoscopic instruments: a survey among EAES surgeons</title><source>SpringerNature Journals</source><creator>Hardon, S. F. ; Rahimi, A. M. ; Postema, R. R. ; Willuth, E. ; Mintz, Y. ; Arezzo, A. ; Dankelman, J. ; Nickel, F. ; Horeman, T.</creator><creatorcontrib>Hardon, S. F. ; Rahimi, A. M. ; Postema, R. R. ; Willuth, E. ; Mintz, Y. ; Arezzo, A. ; Dankelman, J. ; Nickel, F. ; Horeman, T. ; the EAES Technology Committee Study Group</creatorcontrib><description>The complexity of handheld steerable laparoscopic instruments (SLI) may impair the learning curve compared to conventional instruments when first utilized. This study aimed to provide the current state of interest in the use of SLI, the current use of these in daily practice and the type of training which is conducted before using SLI in the operating room (OR) on real patients. An online survey was distributed by European Association of Endoscopic Surgery (EAES) Executive Office to all active members, between January 4th and February 3rd, 2020. The survey consisted of 14 questions regarding the usage and training of steerable laparoscopic instruments. A total of 83 members responded, coming from 33 different countries. Twenty three percent of the respondents using SLI, were using the instruments routinely and of these 21% had not received any formal training in advance of using the instruments in real patients. Of all responding EAES members, 41% considered the instruments to potentially compromise patient safety due to their complexity, learning curve and the inexperience of the surgeons. The respondents reported the three most important aspects of a possible steerable laparoscopic instruments training curriculum to be: hands-on training, safe tissue handling and suturing practice. Finally, a major part of the respondents consider force/pressure feedback data to be of significant importance for implementation of training and assessment of safe laparoscopic and robotic surgery. Training and assessment of skills regarding safe implementation of steerable laparoscopic instruments is lacking. The respondents stressed the need for specific hands-on training during which feedback and assessment of skills should be guaranteed before operating on real patients.</description><identifier>ISSN: 2038-131X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2038-3312</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s13304-022-01258-w</identifier><identifier>PMID: 35416585</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Cham: Springer International Publishing</publisher><subject>Comparative analysis ; Laparoscopic surgery ; Laparoscopy ; Medical equipment ; Medicine ; Medicine &amp; Public Health ; Original ; Original Article ; Pharmaceutical industry ; Physiological apparatus ; Surgeons ; Surgery ; Surveys</subject><ispartof>Updates in Surgery, 2022-10, Vol.74 (5), p.1749-1754</ispartof><rights>The Author(s) 2022</rights><rights>COPYRIGHT 2022 Springer</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c490t-f5a3822154bb3e3383e4b2c1bf0b62393ff65d83e363a46f3481063a137b98de3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c490t-f5a3822154bb3e3383e4b2c1bf0b62393ff65d83e363a46f3481063a137b98de3</cites><orcidid>0000-0003-0876-0242</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s13304-022-01258-w$$EPDF$$P50$$Gspringer$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/10.1007/s13304-022-01258-w$$EHTML$$P50$$Gspringer$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,315,781,785,886,27929,27930,41493,42562,51324</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Hardon, S. F.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rahimi, A. M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Postema, R. R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Willuth, E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mintz, Y.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Arezzo, A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dankelman, J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nickel, F.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Horeman, T.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>the EAES Technology Committee Study Group</creatorcontrib><title>Safe implementation of hand held steerable laparoscopic instruments: a survey among EAES surgeons</title><title>Updates in Surgery</title><addtitle>Updates Surg</addtitle><description>The complexity of handheld steerable laparoscopic instruments (SLI) may impair the learning curve compared to conventional instruments when first utilized. This study aimed to provide the current state of interest in the use of SLI, the current use of these in daily practice and the type of training which is conducted before using SLI in the operating room (OR) on real patients. An online survey was distributed by European Association of Endoscopic Surgery (EAES) Executive Office to all active members, between January 4th and February 3rd, 2020. The survey consisted of 14 questions regarding the usage and training of steerable laparoscopic instruments. A total of 83 members responded, coming from 33 different countries. Twenty three percent of the respondents using SLI, were using the instruments routinely and of these 21% had not received any formal training in advance of using the instruments in real patients. Of all responding EAES members, 41% considered the instruments to potentially compromise patient safety due to their complexity, learning curve and the inexperience of the surgeons. The respondents reported the three most important aspects of a possible steerable laparoscopic instruments training curriculum to be: hands-on training, safe tissue handling and suturing practice. Finally, a major part of the respondents consider force/pressure feedback data to be of significant importance for implementation of training and assessment of safe laparoscopic and robotic surgery. Training and assessment of skills regarding safe implementation of steerable laparoscopic instruments is lacking. The respondents stressed the need for specific hands-on training during which feedback and assessment of skills should be guaranteed before operating on real patients.</description><subject>Comparative analysis</subject><subject>Laparoscopic surgery</subject><subject>Laparoscopy</subject><subject>Medical equipment</subject><subject>Medicine</subject><subject>Medicine &amp; Public Health</subject><subject>Original</subject><subject>Original Article</subject><subject>Pharmaceutical industry</subject><subject>Physiological apparatus</subject><subject>Surgeons</subject><subject>Surgery</subject><subject>Surveys</subject><issn>2038-131X</issn><issn>2038-3312</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2022</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>C6C</sourceid><recordid>eNp9UcFq3DAQFaWlCZv8QE869uJE0theuYfCErZNINBDUuhNyPbIqyBLrmQn5O-rjZdCL5VAMzzNewzvEfKJsyvO2PY6cQBWFkyIgnFRyeLlHTkXDGQBwMX7U8-B_zojlyk9sXygOb4fyRlUJa8rWZ0T_aANUjtODkf0s55t8DQYetC-pwd0PU0zYtStQ-r0pGNIXZhsR61Pc1yOnPSFapqW-IyvVI_BD3S_2z8ckQGDTxfkg9Eu4eWpbsjPb_vHm9vi_sf3u5vdfdGVDZsLU2mQQvCqbFtAAAlYtqLjrWFtLaABY-qqzyjUoMvaQCk5yy2HbdvIHmFDvq6609KO2Hd5s6idmqIddXxVQVv174-3BzWEZ9VkpXIrs8Dnk0AMvxdMsxpt6tA57TEsSYm6bJpGymzshlyto4N2qKw3ISt2-fY42i54NDbjuy2XTNSyqjNBrIQuG5gimr97caaOeao1T5XzVG95qpdMgpWU8rAfMKqnsESfTfwf6w_buaMR</recordid><startdate>20221001</startdate><enddate>20221001</enddate><creator>Hardon, S. F.</creator><creator>Rahimi, A. M.</creator><creator>Postema, R. R.</creator><creator>Willuth, E.</creator><creator>Mintz, Y.</creator><creator>Arezzo, A.</creator><creator>Dankelman, J.</creator><creator>Nickel, F.</creator><creator>Horeman, T.</creator><general>Springer International Publishing</general><general>Springer</general><scope>C6C</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>IAO</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0876-0242</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20221001</creationdate><title>Safe implementation of hand held steerable laparoscopic instruments: a survey among EAES surgeons</title><author>Hardon, S. F. ; Rahimi, A. M. ; Postema, R. R. ; Willuth, E. ; Mintz, Y. ; Arezzo, A. ; Dankelman, J. ; Nickel, F. ; Horeman, T.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c490t-f5a3822154bb3e3383e4b2c1bf0b62393ff65d83e363a46f3481063a137b98de3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2022</creationdate><topic>Comparative analysis</topic><topic>Laparoscopic surgery</topic><topic>Laparoscopy</topic><topic>Medical equipment</topic><topic>Medicine</topic><topic>Medicine &amp; Public Health</topic><topic>Original</topic><topic>Original Article</topic><topic>Pharmaceutical industry</topic><topic>Physiological apparatus</topic><topic>Surgeons</topic><topic>Surgery</topic><topic>Surveys</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Hardon, S. F.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rahimi, A. M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Postema, R. R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Willuth, E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mintz, Y.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Arezzo, A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dankelman, J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nickel, F.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Horeman, T.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>the EAES Technology Committee Study Group</creatorcontrib><collection>Springer Nature OA/Free Journals</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Gale Academic OneFile</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>Updates in Surgery</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Hardon, S. F.</au><au>Rahimi, A. M.</au><au>Postema, R. R.</au><au>Willuth, E.</au><au>Mintz, Y.</au><au>Arezzo, A.</au><au>Dankelman, J.</au><au>Nickel, F.</au><au>Horeman, T.</au><aucorp>the EAES Technology Committee Study Group</aucorp><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Safe implementation of hand held steerable laparoscopic instruments: a survey among EAES surgeons</atitle><jtitle>Updates in Surgery</jtitle><stitle>Updates Surg</stitle><date>2022-10-01</date><risdate>2022</risdate><volume>74</volume><issue>5</issue><spage>1749</spage><epage>1754</epage><pages>1749-1754</pages><issn>2038-131X</issn><eissn>2038-3312</eissn><abstract>The complexity of handheld steerable laparoscopic instruments (SLI) may impair the learning curve compared to conventional instruments when first utilized. This study aimed to provide the current state of interest in the use of SLI, the current use of these in daily practice and the type of training which is conducted before using SLI in the operating room (OR) on real patients. An online survey was distributed by European Association of Endoscopic Surgery (EAES) Executive Office to all active members, between January 4th and February 3rd, 2020. The survey consisted of 14 questions regarding the usage and training of steerable laparoscopic instruments. A total of 83 members responded, coming from 33 different countries. Twenty three percent of the respondents using SLI, were using the instruments routinely and of these 21% had not received any formal training in advance of using the instruments in real patients. Of all responding EAES members, 41% considered the instruments to potentially compromise patient safety due to their complexity, learning curve and the inexperience of the surgeons. The respondents reported the three most important aspects of a possible steerable laparoscopic instruments training curriculum to be: hands-on training, safe tissue handling and suturing practice. Finally, a major part of the respondents consider force/pressure feedback data to be of significant importance for implementation of training and assessment of safe laparoscopic and robotic surgery. Training and assessment of skills regarding safe implementation of steerable laparoscopic instruments is lacking. The respondents stressed the need for specific hands-on training during which feedback and assessment of skills should be guaranteed before operating on real patients.</abstract><cop>Cham</cop><pub>Springer International Publishing</pub><pmid>35416585</pmid><doi>10.1007/s13304-022-01258-w</doi><tpages>6</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0876-0242</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 2038-131X
ispartof Updates in Surgery, 2022-10, Vol.74 (5), p.1749-1754
issn 2038-131X
2038-3312
language eng
recordid cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_9481478
source SpringerNature Journals
subjects Comparative analysis
Laparoscopic surgery
Laparoscopy
Medical equipment
Medicine
Medicine & Public Health
Original
Original Article
Pharmaceutical industry
Physiological apparatus
Surgeons
Surgery
Surveys
title Safe implementation of hand held steerable laparoscopic instruments: a survey among EAES surgeons
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-14T20%3A29%3A30IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-gale_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Safe%20implementation%20of%20hand%20held%20steerable%20laparoscopic%20instruments:%20a%20survey%20among%20EAES%20surgeons&rft.jtitle=Updates%20in%20Surgery&rft.au=Hardon,%20S.%20F.&rft.aucorp=the%20EAES%20Technology%20Committee%20Study%20Group&rft.date=2022-10-01&rft.volume=74&rft.issue=5&rft.spage=1749&rft.epage=1754&rft.pages=1749-1754&rft.issn=2038-131X&rft.eissn=2038-3312&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s13304-022-01258-w&rft_dat=%3Cgale_pubme%3EA718026856%3C/gale_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2649998820&rft_id=info:pmid/35416585&rft_galeid=A718026856&rfr_iscdi=true