Safe implementation of hand held steerable laparoscopic instruments: a survey among EAES surgeons
The complexity of handheld steerable laparoscopic instruments (SLI) may impair the learning curve compared to conventional instruments when first utilized. This study aimed to provide the current state of interest in the use of SLI, the current use of these in daily practice and the type of training...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Updates in Surgery 2022-10, Vol.74 (5), p.1749-1754 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 1754 |
---|---|
container_issue | 5 |
container_start_page | 1749 |
container_title | Updates in Surgery |
container_volume | 74 |
creator | Hardon, S. F. Rahimi, A. M. Postema, R. R. Willuth, E. Mintz, Y. Arezzo, A. Dankelman, J. Nickel, F. Horeman, T. |
description | The complexity of handheld steerable laparoscopic instruments (SLI) may impair the learning curve compared to conventional instruments when first utilized. This study aimed to provide the current state of interest in the use of SLI, the current use of these in daily practice and the type of training which is conducted before using SLI in the operating room (OR) on real patients. An online survey was distributed by European Association of Endoscopic Surgery (EAES) Executive Office to all active members, between January 4th and February 3rd, 2020. The survey consisted of 14 questions regarding the usage and training of steerable laparoscopic instruments. A total of 83 members responded, coming from 33 different countries. Twenty three percent of the respondents using SLI, were using the instruments routinely and of these 21% had not received any formal training in advance of using the instruments in real patients. Of all responding EAES members, 41% considered the instruments to potentially compromise patient safety due to their complexity, learning curve and the inexperience of the surgeons. The respondents reported the three most important aspects of a possible steerable laparoscopic instruments training curriculum to be: hands-on training, safe tissue handling and suturing practice. Finally, a major part of the respondents consider force/pressure feedback data to be of significant importance for implementation of training and assessment of safe laparoscopic and robotic surgery. Training and assessment of skills regarding safe implementation of steerable laparoscopic instruments is lacking. The respondents stressed the need for specific hands-on training during which feedback and assessment of skills should be guaranteed before operating on real patients. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1007/s13304-022-01258-w |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>gale_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_9481478</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><galeid>A718026856</galeid><sourcerecordid>A718026856</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c490t-f5a3822154bb3e3383e4b2c1bf0b62393ff65d83e363a46f3481063a137b98de3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9UcFq3DAQFaWlCZv8QE869uJE0theuYfCErZNINBDUuhNyPbIqyBLrmQn5O-rjZdCL5VAMzzNewzvEfKJsyvO2PY6cQBWFkyIgnFRyeLlHTkXDGQBwMX7U8-B_zojlyk9sXygOb4fyRlUJa8rWZ0T_aANUjtODkf0s55t8DQYetC-pwd0PU0zYtStQ-r0pGNIXZhsR61Pc1yOnPSFapqW-IyvVI_BD3S_2z8ckQGDTxfkg9Eu4eWpbsjPb_vHm9vi_sf3u5vdfdGVDZsLU2mQQvCqbFtAAAlYtqLjrWFtLaABY-qqzyjUoMvaQCk5yy2HbdvIHmFDvq6609KO2Hd5s6idmqIddXxVQVv174-3BzWEZ9VkpXIrs8Dnk0AMvxdMsxpt6tA57TEsSYm6bJpGymzshlyto4N2qKw3ISt2-fY42i54NDbjuy2XTNSyqjNBrIQuG5gimr97caaOeao1T5XzVG95qpdMgpWU8rAfMKqnsESfTfwf6w_buaMR</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2649998820</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Safe implementation of hand held steerable laparoscopic instruments: a survey among EAES surgeons</title><source>SpringerNature Journals</source><creator>Hardon, S. F. ; Rahimi, A. M. ; Postema, R. R. ; Willuth, E. ; Mintz, Y. ; Arezzo, A. ; Dankelman, J. ; Nickel, F. ; Horeman, T.</creator><creatorcontrib>Hardon, S. F. ; Rahimi, A. M. ; Postema, R. R. ; Willuth, E. ; Mintz, Y. ; Arezzo, A. ; Dankelman, J. ; Nickel, F. ; Horeman, T. ; the EAES Technology Committee Study Group</creatorcontrib><description>The complexity of handheld steerable laparoscopic instruments (SLI) may impair the learning curve compared to conventional instruments when first utilized. This study aimed to provide the current state of interest in the use of SLI, the current use of these in daily practice and the type of training which is conducted before using SLI in the operating room (OR) on real patients. An online survey was distributed by European Association of Endoscopic Surgery (EAES) Executive Office to all active members, between January 4th and February 3rd, 2020. The survey consisted of 14 questions regarding the usage and training of steerable laparoscopic instruments. A total of 83 members responded, coming from 33 different countries. Twenty three percent of the respondents using SLI, were using the instruments routinely and of these 21% had not received any formal training in advance of using the instruments in real patients. Of all responding EAES members, 41% considered the instruments to potentially compromise patient safety due to their complexity, learning curve and the inexperience of the surgeons. The respondents reported the three most important aspects of a possible steerable laparoscopic instruments training curriculum to be: hands-on training, safe tissue handling and suturing practice. Finally, a major part of the respondents consider force/pressure feedback data to be of significant importance for implementation of training and assessment of safe laparoscopic and robotic surgery. Training and assessment of skills regarding safe implementation of steerable laparoscopic instruments is lacking. The respondents stressed the need for specific hands-on training during which feedback and assessment of skills should be guaranteed before operating on real patients.</description><identifier>ISSN: 2038-131X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2038-3312</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s13304-022-01258-w</identifier><identifier>PMID: 35416585</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Cham: Springer International Publishing</publisher><subject>Comparative analysis ; Laparoscopic surgery ; Laparoscopy ; Medical equipment ; Medicine ; Medicine & Public Health ; Original ; Original Article ; Pharmaceutical industry ; Physiological apparatus ; Surgeons ; Surgery ; Surveys</subject><ispartof>Updates in Surgery, 2022-10, Vol.74 (5), p.1749-1754</ispartof><rights>The Author(s) 2022</rights><rights>COPYRIGHT 2022 Springer</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c490t-f5a3822154bb3e3383e4b2c1bf0b62393ff65d83e363a46f3481063a137b98de3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c490t-f5a3822154bb3e3383e4b2c1bf0b62393ff65d83e363a46f3481063a137b98de3</cites><orcidid>0000-0003-0876-0242</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s13304-022-01258-w$$EPDF$$P50$$Gspringer$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/10.1007/s13304-022-01258-w$$EHTML$$P50$$Gspringer$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,315,781,785,886,27929,27930,41493,42562,51324</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Hardon, S. F.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rahimi, A. M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Postema, R. R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Willuth, E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mintz, Y.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Arezzo, A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dankelman, J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nickel, F.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Horeman, T.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>the EAES Technology Committee Study Group</creatorcontrib><title>Safe implementation of hand held steerable laparoscopic instruments: a survey among EAES surgeons</title><title>Updates in Surgery</title><addtitle>Updates Surg</addtitle><description>The complexity of handheld steerable laparoscopic instruments (SLI) may impair the learning curve compared to conventional instruments when first utilized. This study aimed to provide the current state of interest in the use of SLI, the current use of these in daily practice and the type of training which is conducted before using SLI in the operating room (OR) on real patients. An online survey was distributed by European Association of Endoscopic Surgery (EAES) Executive Office to all active members, between January 4th and February 3rd, 2020. The survey consisted of 14 questions regarding the usage and training of steerable laparoscopic instruments. A total of 83 members responded, coming from 33 different countries. Twenty three percent of the respondents using SLI, were using the instruments routinely and of these 21% had not received any formal training in advance of using the instruments in real patients. Of all responding EAES members, 41% considered the instruments to potentially compromise patient safety due to their complexity, learning curve and the inexperience of the surgeons. The respondents reported the three most important aspects of a possible steerable laparoscopic instruments training curriculum to be: hands-on training, safe tissue handling and suturing practice. Finally, a major part of the respondents consider force/pressure feedback data to be of significant importance for implementation of training and assessment of safe laparoscopic and robotic surgery. Training and assessment of skills regarding safe implementation of steerable laparoscopic instruments is lacking. The respondents stressed the need for specific hands-on training during which feedback and assessment of skills should be guaranteed before operating on real patients.</description><subject>Comparative analysis</subject><subject>Laparoscopic surgery</subject><subject>Laparoscopy</subject><subject>Medical equipment</subject><subject>Medicine</subject><subject>Medicine & Public Health</subject><subject>Original</subject><subject>Original Article</subject><subject>Pharmaceutical industry</subject><subject>Physiological apparatus</subject><subject>Surgeons</subject><subject>Surgery</subject><subject>Surveys</subject><issn>2038-131X</issn><issn>2038-3312</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2022</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>C6C</sourceid><recordid>eNp9UcFq3DAQFaWlCZv8QE869uJE0theuYfCErZNINBDUuhNyPbIqyBLrmQn5O-rjZdCL5VAMzzNewzvEfKJsyvO2PY6cQBWFkyIgnFRyeLlHTkXDGQBwMX7U8-B_zojlyk9sXygOb4fyRlUJa8rWZ0T_aANUjtODkf0s55t8DQYetC-pwd0PU0zYtStQ-r0pGNIXZhsR61Pc1yOnPSFapqW-IyvVI_BD3S_2z8ckQGDTxfkg9Eu4eWpbsjPb_vHm9vi_sf3u5vdfdGVDZsLU2mQQvCqbFtAAAlYtqLjrWFtLaABY-qqzyjUoMvaQCk5yy2HbdvIHmFDvq6609KO2Hd5s6idmqIddXxVQVv174-3BzWEZ9VkpXIrs8Dnk0AMvxdMsxpt6tA57TEsSYm6bJpGymzshlyto4N2qKw3ISt2-fY42i54NDbjuy2XTNSyqjNBrIQuG5gimr97caaOeao1T5XzVG95qpdMgpWU8rAfMKqnsESfTfwf6w_buaMR</recordid><startdate>20221001</startdate><enddate>20221001</enddate><creator>Hardon, S. F.</creator><creator>Rahimi, A. M.</creator><creator>Postema, R. R.</creator><creator>Willuth, E.</creator><creator>Mintz, Y.</creator><creator>Arezzo, A.</creator><creator>Dankelman, J.</creator><creator>Nickel, F.</creator><creator>Horeman, T.</creator><general>Springer International Publishing</general><general>Springer</general><scope>C6C</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>IAO</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0876-0242</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20221001</creationdate><title>Safe implementation of hand held steerable laparoscopic instruments: a survey among EAES surgeons</title><author>Hardon, S. F. ; Rahimi, A. M. ; Postema, R. R. ; Willuth, E. ; Mintz, Y. ; Arezzo, A. ; Dankelman, J. ; Nickel, F. ; Horeman, T.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c490t-f5a3822154bb3e3383e4b2c1bf0b62393ff65d83e363a46f3481063a137b98de3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2022</creationdate><topic>Comparative analysis</topic><topic>Laparoscopic surgery</topic><topic>Laparoscopy</topic><topic>Medical equipment</topic><topic>Medicine</topic><topic>Medicine & Public Health</topic><topic>Original</topic><topic>Original Article</topic><topic>Pharmaceutical industry</topic><topic>Physiological apparatus</topic><topic>Surgeons</topic><topic>Surgery</topic><topic>Surveys</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Hardon, S. F.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rahimi, A. M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Postema, R. R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Willuth, E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mintz, Y.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Arezzo, A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dankelman, J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nickel, F.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Horeman, T.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>the EAES Technology Committee Study Group</creatorcontrib><collection>Springer Nature OA/Free Journals</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Gale Academic OneFile</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>Updates in Surgery</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Hardon, S. F.</au><au>Rahimi, A. M.</au><au>Postema, R. R.</au><au>Willuth, E.</au><au>Mintz, Y.</au><au>Arezzo, A.</au><au>Dankelman, J.</au><au>Nickel, F.</au><au>Horeman, T.</au><aucorp>the EAES Technology Committee Study Group</aucorp><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Safe implementation of hand held steerable laparoscopic instruments: a survey among EAES surgeons</atitle><jtitle>Updates in Surgery</jtitle><stitle>Updates Surg</stitle><date>2022-10-01</date><risdate>2022</risdate><volume>74</volume><issue>5</issue><spage>1749</spage><epage>1754</epage><pages>1749-1754</pages><issn>2038-131X</issn><eissn>2038-3312</eissn><abstract>The complexity of handheld steerable laparoscopic instruments (SLI) may impair the learning curve compared to conventional instruments when first utilized. This study aimed to provide the current state of interest in the use of SLI, the current use of these in daily practice and the type of training which is conducted before using SLI in the operating room (OR) on real patients. An online survey was distributed by European Association of Endoscopic Surgery (EAES) Executive Office to all active members, between January 4th and February 3rd, 2020. The survey consisted of 14 questions regarding the usage and training of steerable laparoscopic instruments. A total of 83 members responded, coming from 33 different countries. Twenty three percent of the respondents using SLI, were using the instruments routinely and of these 21% had not received any formal training in advance of using the instruments in real patients. Of all responding EAES members, 41% considered the instruments to potentially compromise patient safety due to their complexity, learning curve and the inexperience of the surgeons. The respondents reported the three most important aspects of a possible steerable laparoscopic instruments training curriculum to be: hands-on training, safe tissue handling and suturing practice. Finally, a major part of the respondents consider force/pressure feedback data to be of significant importance for implementation of training and assessment of safe laparoscopic and robotic surgery. Training and assessment of skills regarding safe implementation of steerable laparoscopic instruments is lacking. The respondents stressed the need for specific hands-on training during which feedback and assessment of skills should be guaranteed before operating on real patients.</abstract><cop>Cham</cop><pub>Springer International Publishing</pub><pmid>35416585</pmid><doi>10.1007/s13304-022-01258-w</doi><tpages>6</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0876-0242</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 2038-131X |
ispartof | Updates in Surgery, 2022-10, Vol.74 (5), p.1749-1754 |
issn | 2038-131X 2038-3312 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_9481478 |
source | SpringerNature Journals |
subjects | Comparative analysis Laparoscopic surgery Laparoscopy Medical equipment Medicine Medicine & Public Health Original Original Article Pharmaceutical industry Physiological apparatus Surgeons Surgery Surveys |
title | Safe implementation of hand held steerable laparoscopic instruments: a survey among EAES surgeons |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-14T20%3A29%3A30IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-gale_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Safe%20implementation%20of%20hand%20held%20steerable%20laparoscopic%20instruments:%20a%20survey%20among%20EAES%20surgeons&rft.jtitle=Updates%20in%20Surgery&rft.au=Hardon,%20S.%20F.&rft.aucorp=the%20EAES%20Technology%20Committee%20Study%20Group&rft.date=2022-10-01&rft.volume=74&rft.issue=5&rft.spage=1749&rft.epage=1754&rft.pages=1749-1754&rft.issn=2038-131X&rft.eissn=2038-3312&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s13304-022-01258-w&rft_dat=%3Cgale_pubme%3EA718026856%3C/gale_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2649998820&rft_id=info:pmid/35416585&rft_galeid=A718026856&rfr_iscdi=true |