Partnerships and Community Engagement Key to Policy, Systems, and Environmental Achievements for Healthy Eating and Active Living: a Systematic Mapping Review
Introduction Policy, systems, and environmental (PSE) change approaches frequently address healthy eating and active living (HEAL) priorities. However, the health effects of PSE HEAL initiatives are not well known because of their design complexity and short duration. Planning and evaluation framewo...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Preventing chronic disease 2022-08, Vol.19, p.E54-E54, Article 210466 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | E54 |
---|---|
container_issue | |
container_start_page | E54 |
container_title | Preventing chronic disease |
container_volume | 19 |
creator | Cunningham-Sabo, Leslie Tagtow, Angela Mi, Sirui Engelken, Jessa Johnston, Kiaya Herman, Dena R |
description | Introduction Policy, systems, and environmental (PSE) change approaches frequently address healthy eating and active living (HEAL) priorities. However, the health effects of PSE HEAL initiatives are not well known because of their design complexity and short duration. Planning and evaluation frameworks can guide PSE activities to generate collective impact. We applied a systematic mapping review to the Individual plus PSE Conceptual Framework for Action (I+PSE) to describe characteristics, achievements, challenges, and evaluation strategies of PSE HEAL initiatives. Methods We identified peer-reviewed articles published from January 2009 through January 2021 by using CINAHL, Web of Science, MEDLINE, PsycINFO, and CAB Abstracts databases. Articles describing implementation and results of PSE HEAL initiatives were included. Activities were mapped against I+PSE components to identify gaps in evaluation efforts. Results Independent reviewers examined 437 titles and abstracts; 52 peer-reviewed articles met all inclusion criteria. Twenty-four focused on healthy eating, 5 on active living, and 23 on HEAL. Descriptive analyses identified federal funding of initiatives (typically 1–3 years), multisector settings, and mixed-methods evaluation strategies as dominant characteristics. Only 11 articles reported on initiatives that used a formal planning and evaluation framework. Achievements focused on partnership development, individual behavior, environmental or policy changes, and provision of technical assistance. Challenges included lack of local coalition and community engagement in initiatives and evaluation activities and insufficient time and resources to accomplish objectives. The review team noted vague or absent descriptions of evaluation activities, resulting in questionable characterizations of processes and outcomes. Although formation of partnerships was the most commonly reported accomplishment, I+PSE mapping revealed a lack of engagement assessment and its contributions toward initiative impact. Conclusion PSE HEAL initiatives reported successes in multiple areas but also challenges related to partnership engagement and community buy-in. These 2 areas are essential for the success of PSE HEAL initiatives and need to be adequately evaluated so improvements can be made. |
doi_str_mv | 10.5888/pcd19.210466 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_9480846</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2707606967</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c389t-d38896a13a5179651d121f537da4ca41c9db13bb0836fee8041fc5c370ada6383</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpdkc2O0zAYRSMEYoaBHQ9giQ2LdrDjnzgskKqqzIwoYsTP2vrqOK1HiZ2xnaC8DM9KmlYIWNmyzz367Jtlrwm-5lLKd52uSHmdE8yEeJJdEs74khBOnv61v8hexPiAcV7gQjzPLqjAuMg5u8x-3UNIzoR4sF1E4Cq09m3bO5tGtHF72JvWuIQ-mRElj-59Y_W4QN_GmEwbF3Ng4wYbvDty0KCVPlgzzKmIah_QrYEmHSYbJOv2c2Klkx0M2tphOnmP4OybAI0-Q9cdua9msObny-xZDU00r87rVfbj4-b7-na5_XJzt15tl5rKMi0rKmUpgFDgpCgFJxXJSc1pUQHTwIguqx2hux2WVNTGSMxIrbmmBYYKBJX0Kvtw8nb9rjWVnqYP0Kgu2BbCqDxY9e-Nswe194MqmcSSiUnw9iwI_rE3ManWRm2aBpzxfVTzz2NRimJC3_yHPvg-uOl5M8VzJhmeqMWJ0sHHGEz9ZxiC1bF4NRevTsXT33GboiA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2707524840</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Partnerships and Community Engagement Key to Policy, Systems, and Environmental Achievements for Healthy Eating and Active Living: a Systematic Mapping Review</title><source>PubMed Central Open Access</source><source>EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals</source><source>PubMed Central</source><creator>Cunningham-Sabo, Leslie ; Tagtow, Angela ; Mi, Sirui ; Engelken, Jessa ; Johnston, Kiaya ; Herman, Dena R</creator><creatorcontrib>Cunningham-Sabo, Leslie ; Tagtow, Angela ; Mi, Sirui ; Engelken, Jessa ; Johnston, Kiaya ; Herman, Dena R</creatorcontrib><description>Introduction Policy, systems, and environmental (PSE) change approaches frequently address healthy eating and active living (HEAL) priorities. However, the health effects of PSE HEAL initiatives are not well known because of their design complexity and short duration. Planning and evaluation frameworks can guide PSE activities to generate collective impact. We applied a systematic mapping review to the Individual plus PSE Conceptual Framework for Action (I+PSE) to describe characteristics, achievements, challenges, and evaluation strategies of PSE HEAL initiatives. Methods We identified peer-reviewed articles published from January 2009 through January 2021 by using CINAHL, Web of Science, MEDLINE, PsycINFO, and CAB Abstracts databases. Articles describing implementation and results of PSE HEAL initiatives were included. Activities were mapped against I+PSE components to identify gaps in evaluation efforts. Results Independent reviewers examined 437 titles and abstracts; 52 peer-reviewed articles met all inclusion criteria. Twenty-four focused on healthy eating, 5 on active living, and 23 on HEAL. Descriptive analyses identified federal funding of initiatives (typically 1–3 years), multisector settings, and mixed-methods evaluation strategies as dominant characteristics. Only 11 articles reported on initiatives that used a formal planning and evaluation framework. Achievements focused on partnership development, individual behavior, environmental or policy changes, and provision of technical assistance. Challenges included lack of local coalition and community engagement in initiatives and evaluation activities and insufficient time and resources to accomplish objectives. The review team noted vague or absent descriptions of evaluation activities, resulting in questionable characterizations of processes and outcomes. Although formation of partnerships was the most commonly reported accomplishment, I+PSE mapping revealed a lack of engagement assessment and its contributions toward initiative impact. Conclusion PSE HEAL initiatives reported successes in multiple areas but also challenges related to partnership engagement and community buy-in. These 2 areas are essential for the success of PSE HEAL initiatives and need to be adequately evaluated so improvements can be made.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1545-1151</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1545-1151</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.5888/pcd19.210466</identifier><identifier>PMID: 36007254</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Atlanta: Centers for Disease Control and Prevention</publisher><subject>Community involvement ; Eating behavior ; Evaluation ; Food stamps ; Funding ; Health care ; Intervention ; Meetings ; Nutrition ; Obesity ; Partnerships ; Public health ; Systematic Review</subject><ispartof>Preventing chronic disease, 2022-08, Vol.19, p.E54-E54, Article 210466</ispartof><rights>Published 2022. This article is a U.S. Government work and is in the public domain in the USA.</rights><rights>2022</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c389t-d38896a13a5179651d121f537da4ca41c9db13bb0836fee8041fc5c370ada6383</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c389t-d38896a13a5179651d121f537da4ca41c9db13bb0836fee8041fc5c370ada6383</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9480846/pdf/$$EPDF$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9480846/$$EHTML$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,727,780,784,885,27924,27925,53791,53793</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Cunningham-Sabo, Leslie</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tagtow, Angela</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mi, Sirui</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Engelken, Jessa</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Johnston, Kiaya</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Herman, Dena R</creatorcontrib><title>Partnerships and Community Engagement Key to Policy, Systems, and Environmental Achievements for Healthy Eating and Active Living: a Systematic Mapping Review</title><title>Preventing chronic disease</title><description>Introduction Policy, systems, and environmental (PSE) change approaches frequently address healthy eating and active living (HEAL) priorities. However, the health effects of PSE HEAL initiatives are not well known because of their design complexity and short duration. Planning and evaluation frameworks can guide PSE activities to generate collective impact. We applied a systematic mapping review to the Individual plus PSE Conceptual Framework for Action (I+PSE) to describe characteristics, achievements, challenges, and evaluation strategies of PSE HEAL initiatives. Methods We identified peer-reviewed articles published from January 2009 through January 2021 by using CINAHL, Web of Science, MEDLINE, PsycINFO, and CAB Abstracts databases. Articles describing implementation and results of PSE HEAL initiatives were included. Activities were mapped against I+PSE components to identify gaps in evaluation efforts. Results Independent reviewers examined 437 titles and abstracts; 52 peer-reviewed articles met all inclusion criteria. Twenty-four focused on healthy eating, 5 on active living, and 23 on HEAL. Descriptive analyses identified federal funding of initiatives (typically 1–3 years), multisector settings, and mixed-methods evaluation strategies as dominant characteristics. Only 11 articles reported on initiatives that used a formal planning and evaluation framework. Achievements focused on partnership development, individual behavior, environmental or policy changes, and provision of technical assistance. Challenges included lack of local coalition and community engagement in initiatives and evaluation activities and insufficient time and resources to accomplish objectives. The review team noted vague or absent descriptions of evaluation activities, resulting in questionable characterizations of processes and outcomes. Although formation of partnerships was the most commonly reported accomplishment, I+PSE mapping revealed a lack of engagement assessment and its contributions toward initiative impact. Conclusion PSE HEAL initiatives reported successes in multiple areas but also challenges related to partnership engagement and community buy-in. These 2 areas are essential for the success of PSE HEAL initiatives and need to be adequately evaluated so improvements can be made.</description><subject>Community involvement</subject><subject>Eating behavior</subject><subject>Evaluation</subject><subject>Food stamps</subject><subject>Funding</subject><subject>Health care</subject><subject>Intervention</subject><subject>Meetings</subject><subject>Nutrition</subject><subject>Obesity</subject><subject>Partnerships</subject><subject>Public health</subject><subject>Systematic Review</subject><issn>1545-1151</issn><issn>1545-1151</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2022</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><recordid>eNpdkc2O0zAYRSMEYoaBHQ9giQ2LdrDjnzgskKqqzIwoYsTP2vrqOK1HiZ2xnaC8DM9KmlYIWNmyzz367Jtlrwm-5lLKd52uSHmdE8yEeJJdEs74khBOnv61v8hexPiAcV7gQjzPLqjAuMg5u8x-3UNIzoR4sF1E4Cq09m3bO5tGtHF72JvWuIQ-mRElj-59Y_W4QN_GmEwbF3Ng4wYbvDty0KCVPlgzzKmIah_QrYEmHSYbJOv2c2Klkx0M2tphOnmP4OybAI0-Q9cdua9msObny-xZDU00r87rVfbj4-b7-na5_XJzt15tl5rKMi0rKmUpgFDgpCgFJxXJSc1pUQHTwIguqx2hux2WVNTGSMxIrbmmBYYKBJX0Kvtw8nb9rjWVnqYP0Kgu2BbCqDxY9e-Nswe194MqmcSSiUnw9iwI_rE3ManWRm2aBpzxfVTzz2NRimJC3_yHPvg-uOl5M8VzJhmeqMWJ0sHHGEz9ZxiC1bF4NRevTsXT33GboiA</recordid><startdate>20220825</startdate><enddate>20220825</enddate><creator>Cunningham-Sabo, Leslie</creator><creator>Tagtow, Angela</creator><creator>Mi, Sirui</creator><creator>Engelken, Jessa</creator><creator>Johnston, Kiaya</creator><creator>Herman, Dena R</creator><general>Centers for Disease Control and Prevention</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7RV</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88C</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>8C1</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>K9-</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>KB0</scope><scope>M0R</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M0T</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20220825</creationdate><title>Partnerships and Community Engagement Key to Policy, Systems, and Environmental Achievements for Healthy Eating and Active Living: a Systematic Mapping Review</title><author>Cunningham-Sabo, Leslie ; Tagtow, Angela ; Mi, Sirui ; Engelken, Jessa ; Johnston, Kiaya ; Herman, Dena R</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c389t-d38896a13a5179651d121f537da4ca41c9db13bb0836fee8041fc5c370ada6383</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2022</creationdate><topic>Community involvement</topic><topic>Eating behavior</topic><topic>Evaluation</topic><topic>Food stamps</topic><topic>Funding</topic><topic>Health care</topic><topic>Intervention</topic><topic>Meetings</topic><topic>Nutrition</topic><topic>Obesity</topic><topic>Partnerships</topic><topic>Public health</topic><topic>Systematic Review</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Cunningham-Sabo, Leslie</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tagtow, Angela</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mi, Sirui</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Engelken, Jessa</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Johnston, Kiaya</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Herman, Dena R</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Database</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Healthcare Administration Database (Alumni)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Public Health Database</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>Consumer Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Consumer Health Database</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Healthcare Administration Database</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>Preventing chronic disease</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Cunningham-Sabo, Leslie</au><au>Tagtow, Angela</au><au>Mi, Sirui</au><au>Engelken, Jessa</au><au>Johnston, Kiaya</au><au>Herman, Dena R</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Partnerships and Community Engagement Key to Policy, Systems, and Environmental Achievements for Healthy Eating and Active Living: a Systematic Mapping Review</atitle><jtitle>Preventing chronic disease</jtitle><date>2022-08-25</date><risdate>2022</risdate><volume>19</volume><spage>E54</spage><epage>E54</epage><pages>E54-E54</pages><artnum>210466</artnum><issn>1545-1151</issn><eissn>1545-1151</eissn><abstract>Introduction Policy, systems, and environmental (PSE) change approaches frequently address healthy eating and active living (HEAL) priorities. However, the health effects of PSE HEAL initiatives are not well known because of their design complexity and short duration. Planning and evaluation frameworks can guide PSE activities to generate collective impact. We applied a systematic mapping review to the Individual plus PSE Conceptual Framework for Action (I+PSE) to describe characteristics, achievements, challenges, and evaluation strategies of PSE HEAL initiatives. Methods We identified peer-reviewed articles published from January 2009 through January 2021 by using CINAHL, Web of Science, MEDLINE, PsycINFO, and CAB Abstracts databases. Articles describing implementation and results of PSE HEAL initiatives were included. Activities were mapped against I+PSE components to identify gaps in evaluation efforts. Results Independent reviewers examined 437 titles and abstracts; 52 peer-reviewed articles met all inclusion criteria. Twenty-four focused on healthy eating, 5 on active living, and 23 on HEAL. Descriptive analyses identified federal funding of initiatives (typically 1–3 years), multisector settings, and mixed-methods evaluation strategies as dominant characteristics. Only 11 articles reported on initiatives that used a formal planning and evaluation framework. Achievements focused on partnership development, individual behavior, environmental or policy changes, and provision of technical assistance. Challenges included lack of local coalition and community engagement in initiatives and evaluation activities and insufficient time and resources to accomplish objectives. The review team noted vague or absent descriptions of evaluation activities, resulting in questionable characterizations of processes and outcomes. Although formation of partnerships was the most commonly reported accomplishment, I+PSE mapping revealed a lack of engagement assessment and its contributions toward initiative impact. Conclusion PSE HEAL initiatives reported successes in multiple areas but also challenges related to partnership engagement and community buy-in. These 2 areas are essential for the success of PSE HEAL initiatives and need to be adequately evaluated so improvements can be made.</abstract><cop>Atlanta</cop><pub>Centers for Disease Control and Prevention</pub><pmid>36007254</pmid><doi>10.5888/pcd19.210466</doi><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1545-1151 |
ispartof | Preventing chronic disease, 2022-08, Vol.19, p.E54-E54, Article 210466 |
issn | 1545-1151 1545-1151 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_9480846 |
source | PubMed Central Open Access; EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals; PubMed Central |
subjects | Community involvement Eating behavior Evaluation Food stamps Funding Health care Intervention Meetings Nutrition Obesity Partnerships Public health Systematic Review |
title | Partnerships and Community Engagement Key to Policy, Systems, and Environmental Achievements for Healthy Eating and Active Living: a Systematic Mapping Review |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-05T21%3A28%3A28IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Partnerships%20and%20Community%20Engagement%20Key%20to%20Policy,%20Systems,%20and%20Environmental%20Achievements%20for%20Healthy%20Eating%20and%20Active%20Living:%20a%20Systematic%20Mapping%20Review&rft.jtitle=Preventing%20chronic%20disease&rft.au=Cunningham-Sabo,%20Leslie&rft.date=2022-08-25&rft.volume=19&rft.spage=E54&rft.epage=E54&rft.pages=E54-E54&rft.artnum=210466&rft.issn=1545-1151&rft.eissn=1545-1151&rft_id=info:doi/10.5888/pcd19.210466&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E2707606967%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2707524840&rft_id=info:pmid/36007254&rfr_iscdi=true |