Long-term Outcomes Following Esophagectomy in Older and Younger Adults with Esophageal Cancer

Background Patterns of overall and disease-free survival after esophagectomy for esophageal cancer in older adults have not been carefully studied. Methods Retrospective analysis of all patients with esophageal cancer undergoing esophagectomy from 2005 to 2020 at our institution was performed. Diffe...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of gastrointestinal surgery 2022-06, Vol.26 (6), p.1119-1131
Hauptverfasser: Dezube, Aaron R., Cooper, Lisa, Mazzola, Emanuele, Dolan, Daniel P., Lee, Daniel N., Kucukak, Suden, De Leon, Luis E., Dumontier, Clark, Ademola, Bayonle, Polhemus, Emily, Bueno, Raphael, White, Abby, Swanson, Scott J., Jaklitsch, Michael T., Frain, Laura, Wee, Jon O.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 1131
container_issue 6
container_start_page 1119
container_title Journal of gastrointestinal surgery
container_volume 26
creator Dezube, Aaron R.
Cooper, Lisa
Mazzola, Emanuele
Dolan, Daniel P.
Lee, Daniel N.
Kucukak, Suden
De Leon, Luis E.
Dumontier, Clark
Ademola, Bayonle
Polhemus, Emily
Bueno, Raphael
White, Abby
Swanson, Scott J.
Jaklitsch, Michael T.
Frain, Laura
Wee, Jon O.
description Background Patterns of overall and disease-free survival after esophagectomy for esophageal cancer in older adults have not been carefully studied. Methods Retrospective analysis of all patients with esophageal cancer undergoing esophagectomy from 2005 to 2020 at our institution was performed. Differences in outcomes were stratified by age groups, 
doi_str_mv 10.1007/s11605-022-05295-z
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_9474270</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2645857178</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c474t-a26b1d55b2b7677c11802f7552aec48d99f23685b22a70782b2b313f5ff988553</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kUFv1DAQhS1ERUvhD3BAlrhwMdiOJ3YuSNWqLUgr7QUkOCDL6zjZVI692AlV--vr7bZb4MDJI803b974IfSG0Q-MUvkxM1ZTIJRzQoE3QG6foROmZEVEzevnpaYNIxzg-zF6mfMVpUxSpl6g4woqkLUUJ-jnMoaeTC6NeDVPNo4u44vofbweQo_Pc9xuTO_sFMcbPAS88q1L2IQW_4hz6Et91s5-yvh6mDYH3Hi8MMG69AoddcZn9_rhPUXfLs6_Lj6T5eryy-JsSayQYiKG12vWAqz5uriSljFFeScBuHFWqLZpOl7VqvS5kVQqXsCKVR10XaMUQHWKPu11t_N6dK11YUrG620aRpNudDSD_rsTho3u42_dlP1c0iLw_kEgxV-zy5Meh2yd9ya4OGfNawEKJJOqoO_-Qa_inEI5r1BSQC2U2Dnie8qmmHNy3cEMo3qXnt6np0t6-j49fVuG3v55xmHkMa4CVHsgl9bu-592_0f2Dpc6pj4</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2674564845</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Long-term Outcomes Following Esophagectomy in Older and Younger Adults with Esophageal Cancer</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>SpringerLink Journals</source><creator>Dezube, Aaron R. ; Cooper, Lisa ; Mazzola, Emanuele ; Dolan, Daniel P. ; Lee, Daniel N. ; Kucukak, Suden ; De Leon, Luis E. ; Dumontier, Clark ; Ademola, Bayonle ; Polhemus, Emily ; Bueno, Raphael ; White, Abby ; Swanson, Scott J. ; Jaklitsch, Michael T. ; Frain, Laura ; Wee, Jon O.</creator><creatorcontrib>Dezube, Aaron R. ; Cooper, Lisa ; Mazzola, Emanuele ; Dolan, Daniel P. ; Lee, Daniel N. ; Kucukak, Suden ; De Leon, Luis E. ; Dumontier, Clark ; Ademola, Bayonle ; Polhemus, Emily ; Bueno, Raphael ; White, Abby ; Swanson, Scott J. ; Jaklitsch, Michael T. ; Frain, Laura ; Wee, Jon O.</creatorcontrib><description><![CDATA[Background Patterns of overall and disease-free survival after esophagectomy for esophageal cancer in older adults have not been carefully studied. Methods Retrospective analysis of all patients with esophageal cancer undergoing esophagectomy from 2005 to 2020 at our institution was performed. Differences in outcomes were stratified by age groups, < 75 and ≥ 75 years old, and two time periods, 2005–2012 and 2013–2020. Results A total of 1135 patients were included: 979 (86.3%) patients were < 75 (86.3%), and 156 (13.7%) were ≥ 75 years old. Younger patients had fewer comorbidities, better nutritional status, and were more likely to receive neoadjuvant and adjuvant therapy (all p  < 0.05). However, tumor stage and operative approach were similar, except for increased performance of the McKeown technique in younger patients ( p  = 0.02). Perioperatively, younger patients experienced fewer overall and grade II complications (both p  < 0.05). They had better overall survival (log-rank p -value < 0.001) and median survival, 62.2 vs. 21.5 months ( p  < 0.05). When stratified by pathologic stage, survival was similar for yp0 and pathologic stage II disease (both log-rank p -value > 0.05). Multivariable Cox models showed older age (≥ 75 years old) had increased hazard for reduced overall survival (HR 2.04 95% CI 1.5–2.8; p  < 0.001) but not disease-free survival (HR 1.1 95% CI 0.78–1.6; p  = 0.54). Over time, baseline characteristics remained largely similar, while stage became more advanced with a rise in neoadjuvant use and increased performance of minimally invasive esophagectomy (all p  < 0.05). While overall complication rates improved ( p  < 0.05), overall and recurrence-free survival did not. Overall survival was better in younger patients during both time periods (both log-rank p  < 0.05). Conclusions Despite similar disease-free survival rates, long-term survival was decreased in older adults as compared to younger patients. This may be related to unmeasured factors including frailty, long-term complications after surgery, and competing causes of death. However, our results suggest that survival is similar in those with complete pathologic responses.]]></description><identifier>ISSN: 1091-255X</identifier><identifier>ISSN: 1873-4626</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1873-4626</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s11605-022-05295-z</identifier><identifier>PMID: 35357674</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>New York: Springer US</publisher><subject>Age groups ; Aged ; Body mass index ; Cancer therapies ; Cardiovascular disease ; Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease ; Esophageal cancer ; Esophageal Neoplasms - pathology ; Esophagectomy - methods ; Gastroenterology ; Gastrointestinal surgery ; Humans ; Medicine ; Medicine &amp; Public Health ; Neoadjuvant Therapy - methods ; Older people ; Original Article ; Ostomy ; Patients ; Retrospective Studies ; Robotics ; Statistical analysis ; Surgery ; Surgical outcomes ; Thoracic surgery ; Treatment Outcome ; Variables</subject><ispartof>Journal of gastrointestinal surgery, 2022-06, Vol.26 (6), p.1119-1131</ispartof><rights>The Society for Surgery of the Alimentary Tract 2022</rights><rights>2022. The Society for Surgery of the Alimentary Tract.</rights><rights>The Society for Surgery of the Alimentary Tract 2022.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c474t-a26b1d55b2b7677c11802f7552aec48d99f23685b22a70782b2b313f5ff988553</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c474t-a26b1d55b2b7677c11802f7552aec48d99f23685b22a70782b2b313f5ff988553</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s11605-022-05295-z$$EPDF$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/10.1007/s11605-022-05295-z$$EHTML$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,776,780,881,27903,27904,41467,42536,51297</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35357674$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Dezube, Aaron R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cooper, Lisa</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mazzola, Emanuele</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dolan, Daniel P.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lee, Daniel N.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kucukak, Suden</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>De Leon, Luis E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dumontier, Clark</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ademola, Bayonle</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Polhemus, Emily</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bueno, Raphael</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>White, Abby</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Swanson, Scott J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jaklitsch, Michael T.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Frain, Laura</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wee, Jon O.</creatorcontrib><title>Long-term Outcomes Following Esophagectomy in Older and Younger Adults with Esophageal Cancer</title><title>Journal of gastrointestinal surgery</title><addtitle>J Gastrointest Surg</addtitle><addtitle>J Gastrointest Surg</addtitle><description><![CDATA[Background Patterns of overall and disease-free survival after esophagectomy for esophageal cancer in older adults have not been carefully studied. Methods Retrospective analysis of all patients with esophageal cancer undergoing esophagectomy from 2005 to 2020 at our institution was performed. Differences in outcomes were stratified by age groups, < 75 and ≥ 75 years old, and two time periods, 2005–2012 and 2013–2020. Results A total of 1135 patients were included: 979 (86.3%) patients were < 75 (86.3%), and 156 (13.7%) were ≥ 75 years old. Younger patients had fewer comorbidities, better nutritional status, and were more likely to receive neoadjuvant and adjuvant therapy (all p  < 0.05). However, tumor stage and operative approach were similar, except for increased performance of the McKeown technique in younger patients ( p  = 0.02). Perioperatively, younger patients experienced fewer overall and grade II complications (both p  < 0.05). They had better overall survival (log-rank p -value < 0.001) and median survival, 62.2 vs. 21.5 months ( p  < 0.05). When stratified by pathologic stage, survival was similar for yp0 and pathologic stage II disease (both log-rank p -value > 0.05). Multivariable Cox models showed older age (≥ 75 years old) had increased hazard for reduced overall survival (HR 2.04 95% CI 1.5–2.8; p  < 0.001) but not disease-free survival (HR 1.1 95% CI 0.78–1.6; p  = 0.54). Over time, baseline characteristics remained largely similar, while stage became more advanced with a rise in neoadjuvant use and increased performance of minimally invasive esophagectomy (all p  < 0.05). While overall complication rates improved ( p  < 0.05), overall and recurrence-free survival did not. Overall survival was better in younger patients during both time periods (both log-rank p  < 0.05). Conclusions Despite similar disease-free survival rates, long-term survival was decreased in older adults as compared to younger patients. This may be related to unmeasured factors including frailty, long-term complications after surgery, and competing causes of death. However, our results suggest that survival is similar in those with complete pathologic responses.]]></description><subject>Age groups</subject><subject>Aged</subject><subject>Body mass index</subject><subject>Cancer therapies</subject><subject>Cardiovascular disease</subject><subject>Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease</subject><subject>Esophageal cancer</subject><subject>Esophageal Neoplasms - pathology</subject><subject>Esophagectomy - methods</subject><subject>Gastroenterology</subject><subject>Gastrointestinal surgery</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Medicine</subject><subject>Medicine &amp; Public Health</subject><subject>Neoadjuvant Therapy - methods</subject><subject>Older people</subject><subject>Original Article</subject><subject>Ostomy</subject><subject>Patients</subject><subject>Retrospective Studies</subject><subject>Robotics</subject><subject>Statistical analysis</subject><subject>Surgery</subject><subject>Surgical outcomes</subject><subject>Thoracic surgery</subject><subject>Treatment Outcome</subject><subject>Variables</subject><issn>1091-255X</issn><issn>1873-4626</issn><issn>1873-4626</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2022</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kUFv1DAQhS1ERUvhD3BAlrhwMdiOJ3YuSNWqLUgr7QUkOCDL6zjZVI692AlV--vr7bZb4MDJI803b974IfSG0Q-MUvkxM1ZTIJRzQoE3QG6foROmZEVEzevnpaYNIxzg-zF6mfMVpUxSpl6g4woqkLUUJ-jnMoaeTC6NeDVPNo4u44vofbweQo_Pc9xuTO_sFMcbPAS88q1L2IQW_4hz6Et91s5-yvh6mDYH3Hi8MMG69AoddcZn9_rhPUXfLs6_Lj6T5eryy-JsSayQYiKG12vWAqz5uriSljFFeScBuHFWqLZpOl7VqvS5kVQqXsCKVR10XaMUQHWKPu11t_N6dK11YUrG620aRpNudDSD_rsTho3u42_dlP1c0iLw_kEgxV-zy5Meh2yd9ya4OGfNawEKJJOqoO_-Qa_inEI5r1BSQC2U2Dnie8qmmHNy3cEMo3qXnt6np0t6-j49fVuG3v55xmHkMa4CVHsgl9bu-592_0f2Dpc6pj4</recordid><startdate>20220601</startdate><enddate>20220601</enddate><creator>Dezube, Aaron R.</creator><creator>Cooper, Lisa</creator><creator>Mazzola, Emanuele</creator><creator>Dolan, Daniel P.</creator><creator>Lee, Daniel N.</creator><creator>Kucukak, Suden</creator><creator>De Leon, Luis E.</creator><creator>Dumontier, Clark</creator><creator>Ademola, Bayonle</creator><creator>Polhemus, Emily</creator><creator>Bueno, Raphael</creator><creator>White, Abby</creator><creator>Swanson, Scott J.</creator><creator>Jaklitsch, Michael T.</creator><creator>Frain, Laura</creator><creator>Wee, Jon O.</creator><general>Springer US</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7RV</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>KB0</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20220601</creationdate><title>Long-term Outcomes Following Esophagectomy in Older and Younger Adults with Esophageal Cancer</title><author>Dezube, Aaron R. ; Cooper, Lisa ; Mazzola, Emanuele ; Dolan, Daniel P. ; Lee, Daniel N. ; Kucukak, Suden ; De Leon, Luis E. ; Dumontier, Clark ; Ademola, Bayonle ; Polhemus, Emily ; Bueno, Raphael ; White, Abby ; Swanson, Scott J. ; Jaklitsch, Michael T. ; Frain, Laura ; Wee, Jon O.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c474t-a26b1d55b2b7677c11802f7552aec48d99f23685b22a70782b2b313f5ff988553</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2022</creationdate><topic>Age groups</topic><topic>Aged</topic><topic>Body mass index</topic><topic>Cancer therapies</topic><topic>Cardiovascular disease</topic><topic>Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease</topic><topic>Esophageal cancer</topic><topic>Esophageal Neoplasms - pathology</topic><topic>Esophagectomy - methods</topic><topic>Gastroenterology</topic><topic>Gastrointestinal surgery</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Medicine</topic><topic>Medicine &amp; Public Health</topic><topic>Neoadjuvant Therapy - methods</topic><topic>Older people</topic><topic>Original Article</topic><topic>Ostomy</topic><topic>Patients</topic><topic>Retrospective Studies</topic><topic>Robotics</topic><topic>Statistical analysis</topic><topic>Surgery</topic><topic>Surgical outcomes</topic><topic>Thoracic surgery</topic><topic>Treatment Outcome</topic><topic>Variables</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Dezube, Aaron R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cooper, Lisa</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mazzola, Emanuele</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dolan, Daniel P.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lee, Daniel N.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kucukak, Suden</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>De Leon, Luis E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dumontier, Clark</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ademola, Bayonle</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Polhemus, Emily</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bueno, Raphael</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>White, Abby</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Swanson, Scott J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jaklitsch, Michael T.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Frain, Laura</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wee, Jon O.</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Database</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Databases</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>Journal of gastrointestinal surgery</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Dezube, Aaron R.</au><au>Cooper, Lisa</au><au>Mazzola, Emanuele</au><au>Dolan, Daniel P.</au><au>Lee, Daniel N.</au><au>Kucukak, Suden</au><au>De Leon, Luis E.</au><au>Dumontier, Clark</au><au>Ademola, Bayonle</au><au>Polhemus, Emily</au><au>Bueno, Raphael</au><au>White, Abby</au><au>Swanson, Scott J.</au><au>Jaklitsch, Michael T.</au><au>Frain, Laura</au><au>Wee, Jon O.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Long-term Outcomes Following Esophagectomy in Older and Younger Adults with Esophageal Cancer</atitle><jtitle>Journal of gastrointestinal surgery</jtitle><stitle>J Gastrointest Surg</stitle><addtitle>J Gastrointest Surg</addtitle><date>2022-06-01</date><risdate>2022</risdate><volume>26</volume><issue>6</issue><spage>1119</spage><epage>1131</epage><pages>1119-1131</pages><issn>1091-255X</issn><issn>1873-4626</issn><eissn>1873-4626</eissn><abstract><![CDATA[Background Patterns of overall and disease-free survival after esophagectomy for esophageal cancer in older adults have not been carefully studied. Methods Retrospective analysis of all patients with esophageal cancer undergoing esophagectomy from 2005 to 2020 at our institution was performed. Differences in outcomes were stratified by age groups, < 75 and ≥ 75 years old, and two time periods, 2005–2012 and 2013–2020. Results A total of 1135 patients were included: 979 (86.3%) patients were < 75 (86.3%), and 156 (13.7%) were ≥ 75 years old. Younger patients had fewer comorbidities, better nutritional status, and were more likely to receive neoadjuvant and adjuvant therapy (all p  < 0.05). However, tumor stage and operative approach were similar, except for increased performance of the McKeown technique in younger patients ( p  = 0.02). Perioperatively, younger patients experienced fewer overall and grade II complications (both p  < 0.05). They had better overall survival (log-rank p -value < 0.001) and median survival, 62.2 vs. 21.5 months ( p  < 0.05). When stratified by pathologic stage, survival was similar for yp0 and pathologic stage II disease (both log-rank p -value > 0.05). Multivariable Cox models showed older age (≥ 75 years old) had increased hazard for reduced overall survival (HR 2.04 95% CI 1.5–2.8; p  < 0.001) but not disease-free survival (HR 1.1 95% CI 0.78–1.6; p  = 0.54). Over time, baseline characteristics remained largely similar, while stage became more advanced with a rise in neoadjuvant use and increased performance of minimally invasive esophagectomy (all p  < 0.05). While overall complication rates improved ( p  < 0.05), overall and recurrence-free survival did not. Overall survival was better in younger patients during both time periods (both log-rank p  < 0.05). Conclusions Despite similar disease-free survival rates, long-term survival was decreased in older adults as compared to younger patients. This may be related to unmeasured factors including frailty, long-term complications after surgery, and competing causes of death. However, our results suggest that survival is similar in those with complete pathologic responses.]]></abstract><cop>New York</cop><pub>Springer US</pub><pmid>35357674</pmid><doi>10.1007/s11605-022-05295-z</doi><tpages>13</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1091-255X
ispartof Journal of gastrointestinal surgery, 2022-06, Vol.26 (6), p.1119-1131
issn 1091-255X
1873-4626
1873-4626
language eng
recordid cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_9474270
source MEDLINE; SpringerLink Journals
subjects Age groups
Aged
Body mass index
Cancer therapies
Cardiovascular disease
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease
Esophageal cancer
Esophageal Neoplasms - pathology
Esophagectomy - methods
Gastroenterology
Gastrointestinal surgery
Humans
Medicine
Medicine & Public Health
Neoadjuvant Therapy - methods
Older people
Original Article
Ostomy
Patients
Retrospective Studies
Robotics
Statistical analysis
Surgery
Surgical outcomes
Thoracic surgery
Treatment Outcome
Variables
title Long-term Outcomes Following Esophagectomy in Older and Younger Adults with Esophageal Cancer
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-24T19%3A49%3A23IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Long-term%20Outcomes%20Following%20Esophagectomy%20in%20Older%20and%20Younger%20Adults%20with%20Esophageal%20Cancer&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20gastrointestinal%20surgery&rft.au=Dezube,%20Aaron%20R.&rft.date=2022-06-01&rft.volume=26&rft.issue=6&rft.spage=1119&rft.epage=1131&rft.pages=1119-1131&rft.issn=1091-255X&rft.eissn=1873-4626&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s11605-022-05295-z&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E2645857178%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2674564845&rft_id=info:pmid/35357674&rfr_iscdi=true