Comparison of maxillary molar roots with maxillary sinus in high-resolution CBCT: A retrospective study
Background: The maxillary sinus is a pyramidal-shaped osseous cavity, and maxillary molars are found to be in close proximity to the sinus floor or even protruding into it. The present study was conducted to measure the relation between the roots and sinus floor and also the thickness of the bone us...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Journal of pharmacy & bioallied science 2022-07, Vol.14 (5), p.833-836 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 836 |
---|---|
container_issue | 5 |
container_start_page | 833 |
container_title | Journal of pharmacy & bioallied science |
container_volume | 14 |
creator | Ranjan, Vikash Maiti, Soumendu Gupta, Ragini Singh, Lalit Tyagi, Mahima Bhardwaj, Deepti |
description | Background: The maxillary sinus is a pyramidal-shaped osseous cavity, and maxillary molars are found to be in close proximity to the sinus floor or even protruding into it. The present study was conducted to measure the relation between the roots and sinus floor and also the thickness of the bone using CBCT to determine age and gender differences. Materials and Methods: The individuals were separated into two groups based on age: Those under 40 and those over 40 years. There were 25 men and 25 females in the study. Axial, coronal, and sagittal slices of the CBCT images were obtained. Results: The first molar root distance and cortical bone thickness varied significantly between men and women, as well as across different ages. Mesiobuccal root with sinus floor was shown to have a substantial mean value for both sexes (P = 0.049 and P = 0.003). In females, the thickness of the buccal plate was 1.291 mm, whereas, in men, it was 2.447 mm (P = 0.000). There was a substantial difference in the thickness of the buccal plate between men and women who were at least 40 years old (P = 0.000). Conclusion: This study suggests how important it is to look at anatomical features and bone thickness when determining a person's age and gender. |
doi_str_mv | 10.4103/jpbs.jpbs_14_22 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>gale_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_9469344</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><galeid>A711553110</galeid><sourcerecordid>A711553110</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c366s-d35bd935a939d95b61ee425d71321126b0d069e3574b1a59c21c1559854503c23</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1Uk1v1DAQjRCIVqVnrpa4cMnWn0nNAWmJoK1UiUt7thJnsuttYgc76bb_nlm20A9R2_JYnveeZ8aTZR8ZXUhGxclmbNJitxkmDedvskOqS5WXkhZvn5wPsuOUNhSH0Fwz8T47EAVjtGT6MFtVYRjr6FLwJHRkqO9c39fxngwBDYkhTIls3bR-4krOz4k4T9Zutc4jpNDPk0OB6lt19YUsSYQphjSCndwtkDTN7f2H7F1X9wmOH-xRdv3j-1V1nl_-PLuolpe5FUWR8laoptVC1VroVqumYACSq7ZkgjPGi4a2tNAgVCkbVittObNMKX2qpKLCcnGUfd3rjnMzQGvBT7HuzRjdgKGbUDvz3OPd2qzCrdGy0EJKFPj8IBDDrxnSZAaXLGDmHsKcDC-ZklJiYRH66QV0E-boMT3DUQwXRvyIWtU9GOe7gO_anahZlgyDF_gXiFr8B4WzhcHZ4KFzeP-McLInWCx1itD9y5FRs2sP86czHtsDGcs9Yxv6CWK66ectRIO1uPFh-xrNnAph_jaJ-A2XGsSE</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2693693126</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Comparison of maxillary molar roots with maxillary sinus in high-resolution CBCT: A retrospective study</title><source>Medknow Open Access Medical Journals</source><source>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</source><source>EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals</source><source>PubMed Central</source><source>PubMed Central Open Access</source><creator>Ranjan, Vikash ; Maiti, Soumendu ; Gupta, Ragini ; Singh, Lalit ; Tyagi, Mahima ; Bhardwaj, Deepti</creator><creatorcontrib>Ranjan, Vikash ; Maiti, Soumendu ; Gupta, Ragini ; Singh, Lalit ; Tyagi, Mahima ; Bhardwaj, Deepti</creatorcontrib><description>Background: The maxillary sinus is a pyramidal-shaped osseous cavity, and maxillary molars are found to be in close proximity to the sinus floor or even protruding into it. The present study was conducted to measure the relation between the roots and sinus floor and also the thickness of the bone using CBCT to determine age and gender differences. Materials and Methods: The individuals were separated into two groups based on age: Those under 40 and those over 40 years. There were 25 men and 25 females in the study. Axial, coronal, and sagittal slices of the CBCT images were obtained. Results: The first molar root distance and cortical bone thickness varied significantly between men and women, as well as across different ages. Mesiobuccal root with sinus floor was shown to have a substantial mean value for both sexes (P = 0.049 and P = 0.003). In females, the thickness of the buccal plate was 1.291 mm, whereas, in men, it was 2.447 mm (P = 0.000). There was a substantial difference in the thickness of the buccal plate between men and women who were at least 40 years old (P = 0.000). Conclusion: This study suggests how important it is to look at anatomical features and bone thickness when determining a person's age and gender.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0975-7406</identifier><identifier>ISSN: 0976-4879</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 0975-7406</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.4103/jpbs.jpbs_14_22</identifier><identifier>PMID: 36110719</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Mumbai: Wolters Kluwer India Pvt. Ltd</publisher><subject>Age ; Cortical bone ; Dental roots ; Gender ; Gender differences ; Maxillary sinus ; Molars ; Original ; Sex differences ; Sinuses</subject><ispartof>Journal of pharmacy & bioallied science, 2022-07, Vol.14 (5), p.833-836</ispartof><rights>COPYRIGHT 2022 Medknow Publications and Media Pvt. Ltd.</rights><rights>2022. This article is published under (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0/) (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><rights>Copyright: © 2022 Journal of Pharmacy and Bioallied Sciences 2022</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c366s-d35bd935a939d95b61ee425d71321126b0d069e3574b1a59c21c1559854503c23</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9469344/pdf/$$EPDF$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9469344/$$EHTML$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,723,776,780,860,881,27435,27901,27902,53766,53768</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Ranjan, Vikash</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Maiti, Soumendu</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gupta, Ragini</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Singh, Lalit</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tyagi, Mahima</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bhardwaj, Deepti</creatorcontrib><title>Comparison of maxillary molar roots with maxillary sinus in high-resolution CBCT: A retrospective study</title><title>Journal of pharmacy & bioallied science</title><description>Background: The maxillary sinus is a pyramidal-shaped osseous cavity, and maxillary molars are found to be in close proximity to the sinus floor or even protruding into it. The present study was conducted to measure the relation between the roots and sinus floor and also the thickness of the bone using CBCT to determine age and gender differences. Materials and Methods: The individuals were separated into two groups based on age: Those under 40 and those over 40 years. There were 25 men and 25 females in the study. Axial, coronal, and sagittal slices of the CBCT images were obtained. Results: The first molar root distance and cortical bone thickness varied significantly between men and women, as well as across different ages. Mesiobuccal root with sinus floor was shown to have a substantial mean value for both sexes (P = 0.049 and P = 0.003). In females, the thickness of the buccal plate was 1.291 mm, whereas, in men, it was 2.447 mm (P = 0.000). There was a substantial difference in the thickness of the buccal plate between men and women who were at least 40 years old (P = 0.000). Conclusion: This study suggests how important it is to look at anatomical features and bone thickness when determining a person's age and gender.</description><subject>Age</subject><subject>Cortical bone</subject><subject>Dental roots</subject><subject>Gender</subject><subject>Gender differences</subject><subject>Maxillary sinus</subject><subject>Molars</subject><subject>Original</subject><subject>Sex differences</subject><subject>Sinuses</subject><issn>0975-7406</issn><issn>0976-4879</issn><issn>0975-7406</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2022</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>8G5</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>GUQSH</sourceid><sourceid>M2O</sourceid><recordid>eNp1Uk1v1DAQjRCIVqVnrpa4cMnWn0nNAWmJoK1UiUt7thJnsuttYgc76bb_nlm20A9R2_JYnveeZ8aTZR8ZXUhGxclmbNJitxkmDedvskOqS5WXkhZvn5wPsuOUNhSH0Fwz8T47EAVjtGT6MFtVYRjr6FLwJHRkqO9c39fxngwBDYkhTIls3bR-4krOz4k4T9Zutc4jpNDPk0OB6lt19YUsSYQphjSCndwtkDTN7f2H7F1X9wmOH-xRdv3j-1V1nl_-PLuolpe5FUWR8laoptVC1VroVqumYACSq7ZkgjPGi4a2tNAgVCkbVittObNMKX2qpKLCcnGUfd3rjnMzQGvBT7HuzRjdgKGbUDvz3OPd2qzCrdGy0EJKFPj8IBDDrxnSZAaXLGDmHsKcDC-ZklJiYRH66QV0E-boMT3DUQwXRvyIWtU9GOe7gO_anahZlgyDF_gXiFr8B4WzhcHZ4KFzeP-McLInWCx1itD9y5FRs2sP86czHtsDGcs9Yxv6CWK66ectRIO1uPFh-xrNnAph_jaJ-A2XGsSE</recordid><startdate>20220701</startdate><enddate>20220701</enddate><creator>Ranjan, Vikash</creator><creator>Maiti, Soumendu</creator><creator>Gupta, Ragini</creator><creator>Singh, Lalit</creator><creator>Tyagi, Mahima</creator><creator>Bhardwaj, Deepti</creator><general>Wolters Kluwer India Pvt. Ltd</general><general>Medknow Publications and Media Pvt. Ltd</general><general>Medknow Publications & Media Pvt. Ltd</general><general>Wolters Kluwer - Medknow</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7RV</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BBNVY</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>KB0</scope><scope>LK8</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>M7P</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20220701</creationdate><title>Comparison of maxillary molar roots with maxillary sinus in high-resolution CBCT: A retrospective study</title><author>Ranjan, Vikash ; Maiti, Soumendu ; Gupta, Ragini ; Singh, Lalit ; Tyagi, Mahima ; Bhardwaj, Deepti</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c366s-d35bd935a939d95b61ee425d71321126b0d069e3574b1a59c21c1559854503c23</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2022</creationdate><topic>Age</topic><topic>Cortical bone</topic><topic>Dental roots</topic><topic>Gender</topic><topic>Gender differences</topic><topic>Maxillary sinus</topic><topic>Molars</topic><topic>Original</topic><topic>Sex differences</topic><topic>Sinuses</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Ranjan, Vikash</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Maiti, Soumendu</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gupta, Ragini</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Singh, Lalit</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tyagi, Mahima</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bhardwaj, Deepti</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Database</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Research Library</collection><collection>Biological Science Database</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>Publicly Available Content Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>Journal of pharmacy & bioallied science</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Ranjan, Vikash</au><au>Maiti, Soumendu</au><au>Gupta, Ragini</au><au>Singh, Lalit</au><au>Tyagi, Mahima</au><au>Bhardwaj, Deepti</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Comparison of maxillary molar roots with maxillary sinus in high-resolution CBCT: A retrospective study</atitle><jtitle>Journal of pharmacy & bioallied science</jtitle><date>2022-07-01</date><risdate>2022</risdate><volume>14</volume><issue>5</issue><spage>833</spage><epage>836</epage><pages>833-836</pages><issn>0975-7406</issn><issn>0976-4879</issn><eissn>0975-7406</eissn><abstract>Background: The maxillary sinus is a pyramidal-shaped osseous cavity, and maxillary molars are found to be in close proximity to the sinus floor or even protruding into it. The present study was conducted to measure the relation between the roots and sinus floor and also the thickness of the bone using CBCT to determine age and gender differences. Materials and Methods: The individuals were separated into two groups based on age: Those under 40 and those over 40 years. There were 25 men and 25 females in the study. Axial, coronal, and sagittal slices of the CBCT images were obtained. Results: The first molar root distance and cortical bone thickness varied significantly between men and women, as well as across different ages. Mesiobuccal root with sinus floor was shown to have a substantial mean value for both sexes (P = 0.049 and P = 0.003). In females, the thickness of the buccal plate was 1.291 mm, whereas, in men, it was 2.447 mm (P = 0.000). There was a substantial difference in the thickness of the buccal plate between men and women who were at least 40 years old (P = 0.000). Conclusion: This study suggests how important it is to look at anatomical features and bone thickness when determining a person's age and gender.</abstract><cop>Mumbai</cop><pub>Wolters Kluwer India Pvt. Ltd</pub><pmid>36110719</pmid><doi>10.4103/jpbs.jpbs_14_22</doi><tpages>4</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0975-7406 |
ispartof | Journal of pharmacy & bioallied science, 2022-07, Vol.14 (5), p.833-836 |
issn | 0975-7406 0976-4879 0975-7406 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_9469344 |
source | Medknow Open Access Medical Journals; DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals; EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals; PubMed Central; PubMed Central Open Access |
subjects | Age Cortical bone Dental roots Gender Gender differences Maxillary sinus Molars Original Sex differences Sinuses |
title | Comparison of maxillary molar roots with maxillary sinus in high-resolution CBCT: A retrospective study |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-05T11%3A26%3A59IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-gale_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Comparison%20of%20maxillary%20molar%20roots%20with%20maxillary%20sinus%20in%20high-resolution%20CBCT:%20A%20retrospective%20study&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20pharmacy%20&%20bioallied%20science&rft.au=Ranjan,%20Vikash&rft.date=2022-07-01&rft.volume=14&rft.issue=5&rft.spage=833&rft.epage=836&rft.pages=833-836&rft.issn=0975-7406&rft.eissn=0975-7406&rft_id=info:doi/10.4103/jpbs.jpbs_14_22&rft_dat=%3Cgale_pubme%3EA711553110%3C/gale_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2693693126&rft_id=info:pmid/36110719&rft_galeid=A711553110&rfr_iscdi=true |