CA-125 monitoring in gynecologic cancer patients with COVID-19: A case series (413)
Objectives: CA-125 has long been utilized as a marker for gynecologic malignancies but can be elevated in many other inflammatory conditions, including lung disease. A retrospective study of tumor markers in non-cancer patients saw a rise in CA-125 values during severe COVID-19 infections. Similarly...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Gynecologic oncology 2022-08, Vol.166, p.S209-S209 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | S209 |
---|---|
container_issue | |
container_start_page | S209 |
container_title | Gynecologic oncology |
container_volume | 166 |
creator | Mumford, Brigid Lemon, Lara Taylor, Sarah |
description | Objectives:
CA-125 has long been utilized as a marker for gynecologic malignancies but can be elevated in many other inflammatory conditions, including lung disease. A retrospective study of tumor markers in non-cancer patients saw a rise in CA-125 values during severe COVID-19 infections. Similarly, a case report published on June 17, 2020, described a significant rise in CA-125 values during an ovarian cancer patient’s COVID-19 infection without evidence of disease progression. Given the potential confounding effect this could have on surveillance and treatment planning, we sought to describe the impact of COVID-19 infections on CA-125 trends in a gynecologic oncology patient population.
Methods:
We conducted a retrospective chart review of patients treated at a UPMC hospital during the COVID-19 pandemic from March 2020 through July 2021. Patients were included for analysis if they had a confirmed gynecologic malignancy, a COVID-19 infection, and had more than one CA-125 value drawn. The CA-125 values were plotted against the timeline of their COVID-19 infections to assess for trends in CA-125 values during and after infection.
Results:
There were 78 individuals identified with a COVID-19 infection and a CA-125 drawn following their positive COVID-19 test. Of these 78 patients, 18 had both gynecologic malignancy and more than one CA-125 drawn. Of these 18 patients, only one had an appreciable rise in their CA-125 values at the time of their COVID-19 diagnosis that resolved following their infection and could not be attributed to disease progression. Four patients were diagnosed with cancer at the time of COVID-19 diagnosis and had elevated CA-125 values. One patient passed before receiving treatment, and the other three had CA-125 values that trended down as they received treatment for their cancer. Two patients were noted to have a mild rise in their CA-125 at the time of their COVID-19 infection that continued to rise as they were diagnosed with the progression of their cancer. Most of the 18 patients (
n
=11, 61.1%) did not show an increase in CA-125 coinciding with their COVID-19 infection. They had either stable or decreasing CA-125 at the time of and following their COVID-19 diagnosis.
Conclusions:
This case series illustrates that while CA-125 values may increase during acute COVID-19 infection, cancer remains the most likely cause of a CA-125 increase. Clinical suspicion should remain high for a possible change in cancer status. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1016/S0090-8258(22)01635-3 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>pubmedcentral_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_9462872</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_9462872</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c1483-71bf9fac7e7bfe15a3ce020c6417ec71dd42526aabc40680109eb62262f218033</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpVkE1LAzEQhoMoWKs_QcixPUQnk01214NQ1q9CoYeq15BNs9tIu1uSVem_d9uK4Glg5p2HmYeQaw43HLi6XQDkwDKU2Qhx3HeEZOKEDDjkkqlM5qdk8Bc5JxcxfgCAAI4DsigmjKOkm7bxXRt8U1Pf0HrXONuu29pbak1jXaBb03nXdJF--25Fi_n79IHx_I5O-kB0NLrgXaSjhIvxJTmrzDq6q986JG9Pj6_FC5vNn6fFZMYsTzLBUl5WeWVs6tKyclwaYR0gWJXw1NmUL5cJSlTGlDYBlUH_jisVosIKeQZCDMn9kbv9LDduafvzglnrbfAbE3a6NV7_nzR-pev2S-eJwizFHiCPABvaGIOr_nY56L1afVCr9940oj6o1UL8AGJKavE</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>CA-125 monitoring in gynecologic cancer patients with COVID-19: A case series (413)</title><source>Access via ScienceDirect (Elsevier)</source><creator>Mumford, Brigid ; Lemon, Lara ; Taylor, Sarah</creator><creatorcontrib>Mumford, Brigid ; Lemon, Lara ; Taylor, Sarah</creatorcontrib><description>Objectives:
CA-125 has long been utilized as a marker for gynecologic malignancies but can be elevated in many other inflammatory conditions, including lung disease. A retrospective study of tumor markers in non-cancer patients saw a rise in CA-125 values during severe COVID-19 infections. Similarly, a case report published on June 17, 2020, described a significant rise in CA-125 values during an ovarian cancer patient’s COVID-19 infection without evidence of disease progression. Given the potential confounding effect this could have on surveillance and treatment planning, we sought to describe the impact of COVID-19 infections on CA-125 trends in a gynecologic oncology patient population.
Methods:
We conducted a retrospective chart review of patients treated at a UPMC hospital during the COVID-19 pandemic from March 2020 through July 2021. Patients were included for analysis if they had a confirmed gynecologic malignancy, a COVID-19 infection, and had more than one CA-125 value drawn. The CA-125 values were plotted against the timeline of their COVID-19 infections to assess for trends in CA-125 values during and after infection.
Results:
There were 78 individuals identified with a COVID-19 infection and a CA-125 drawn following their positive COVID-19 test. Of these 78 patients, 18 had both gynecologic malignancy and more than one CA-125 drawn. Of these 18 patients, only one had an appreciable rise in their CA-125 values at the time of their COVID-19 diagnosis that resolved following their infection and could not be attributed to disease progression. Four patients were diagnosed with cancer at the time of COVID-19 diagnosis and had elevated CA-125 values. One patient passed before receiving treatment, and the other three had CA-125 values that trended down as they received treatment for their cancer. Two patients were noted to have a mild rise in their CA-125 at the time of their COVID-19 infection that continued to rise as they were diagnosed with the progression of their cancer. Most of the 18 patients (
n
=11, 61.1%) did not show an increase in CA-125 coinciding with their COVID-19 infection. They had either stable or decreasing CA-125 at the time of and following their COVID-19 diagnosis.
Conclusions:
This case series illustrates that while CA-125 values may increase during acute COVID-19 infection, cancer remains the most likely cause of a CA-125 increase. Clinical suspicion should remain high for a possible change in cancer status.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0090-8258</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1095-6859</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/S0090-8258(22)01635-3</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Elsevier Inc</publisher><ispartof>Gynecologic oncology, 2022-08, Vol.166, p.S209-S209</ispartof><rights>Copyright © 2022 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved. 2022 Elsevier Inc.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>230,315,781,785,886,27929,27930</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Mumford, Brigid</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lemon, Lara</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Taylor, Sarah</creatorcontrib><title>CA-125 monitoring in gynecologic cancer patients with COVID-19: A case series (413)</title><title>Gynecologic oncology</title><description>Objectives:
CA-125 has long been utilized as a marker for gynecologic malignancies but can be elevated in many other inflammatory conditions, including lung disease. A retrospective study of tumor markers in non-cancer patients saw a rise in CA-125 values during severe COVID-19 infections. Similarly, a case report published on June 17, 2020, described a significant rise in CA-125 values during an ovarian cancer patient’s COVID-19 infection without evidence of disease progression. Given the potential confounding effect this could have on surveillance and treatment planning, we sought to describe the impact of COVID-19 infections on CA-125 trends in a gynecologic oncology patient population.
Methods:
We conducted a retrospective chart review of patients treated at a UPMC hospital during the COVID-19 pandemic from March 2020 through July 2021. Patients were included for analysis if they had a confirmed gynecologic malignancy, a COVID-19 infection, and had more than one CA-125 value drawn. The CA-125 values were plotted against the timeline of their COVID-19 infections to assess for trends in CA-125 values during and after infection.
Results:
There were 78 individuals identified with a COVID-19 infection and a CA-125 drawn following their positive COVID-19 test. Of these 78 patients, 18 had both gynecologic malignancy and more than one CA-125 drawn. Of these 18 patients, only one had an appreciable rise in their CA-125 values at the time of their COVID-19 diagnosis that resolved following their infection and could not be attributed to disease progression. Four patients were diagnosed with cancer at the time of COVID-19 diagnosis and had elevated CA-125 values. One patient passed before receiving treatment, and the other three had CA-125 values that trended down as they received treatment for their cancer. Two patients were noted to have a mild rise in their CA-125 at the time of their COVID-19 infection that continued to rise as they were diagnosed with the progression of their cancer. Most of the 18 patients (
n
=11, 61.1%) did not show an increase in CA-125 coinciding with their COVID-19 infection. They had either stable or decreasing CA-125 at the time of and following their COVID-19 diagnosis.
Conclusions:
This case series illustrates that while CA-125 values may increase during acute COVID-19 infection, cancer remains the most likely cause of a CA-125 increase. Clinical suspicion should remain high for a possible change in cancer status.</description><issn>0090-8258</issn><issn>1095-6859</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2022</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNpVkE1LAzEQhoMoWKs_QcixPUQnk01214NQ1q9CoYeq15BNs9tIu1uSVem_d9uK4Glg5p2HmYeQaw43HLi6XQDkwDKU2Qhx3HeEZOKEDDjkkqlM5qdk8Bc5JxcxfgCAAI4DsigmjKOkm7bxXRt8U1Pf0HrXONuu29pbak1jXaBb03nXdJF--25Fi_n79IHx_I5O-kB0NLrgXaSjhIvxJTmrzDq6q986JG9Pj6_FC5vNn6fFZMYsTzLBUl5WeWVs6tKyclwaYR0gWJXw1NmUL5cJSlTGlDYBlUH_jisVosIKeQZCDMn9kbv9LDduafvzglnrbfAbE3a6NV7_nzR-pev2S-eJwizFHiCPABvaGIOr_nY56L1afVCr9940oj6o1UL8AGJKavE</recordid><startdate>202208</startdate><enddate>202208</enddate><creator>Mumford, Brigid</creator><creator>Lemon, Lara</creator><creator>Taylor, Sarah</creator><general>Elsevier Inc</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>5PM</scope></search><sort><creationdate>202208</creationdate><title>CA-125 monitoring in gynecologic cancer patients with COVID-19: A case series (413)</title><author>Mumford, Brigid ; Lemon, Lara ; Taylor, Sarah</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c1483-71bf9fac7e7bfe15a3ce020c6417ec71dd42526aabc40680109eb62262f218033</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2022</creationdate><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Mumford, Brigid</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lemon, Lara</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Taylor, Sarah</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>Gynecologic oncology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Mumford, Brigid</au><au>Lemon, Lara</au><au>Taylor, Sarah</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>CA-125 monitoring in gynecologic cancer patients with COVID-19: A case series (413)</atitle><jtitle>Gynecologic oncology</jtitle><date>2022-08</date><risdate>2022</risdate><volume>166</volume><spage>S209</spage><epage>S209</epage><pages>S209-S209</pages><issn>0090-8258</issn><eissn>1095-6859</eissn><abstract>Objectives:
CA-125 has long been utilized as a marker for gynecologic malignancies but can be elevated in many other inflammatory conditions, including lung disease. A retrospective study of tumor markers in non-cancer patients saw a rise in CA-125 values during severe COVID-19 infections. Similarly, a case report published on June 17, 2020, described a significant rise in CA-125 values during an ovarian cancer patient’s COVID-19 infection without evidence of disease progression. Given the potential confounding effect this could have on surveillance and treatment planning, we sought to describe the impact of COVID-19 infections on CA-125 trends in a gynecologic oncology patient population.
Methods:
We conducted a retrospective chart review of patients treated at a UPMC hospital during the COVID-19 pandemic from March 2020 through July 2021. Patients were included for analysis if they had a confirmed gynecologic malignancy, a COVID-19 infection, and had more than one CA-125 value drawn. The CA-125 values were plotted against the timeline of their COVID-19 infections to assess for trends in CA-125 values during and after infection.
Results:
There were 78 individuals identified with a COVID-19 infection and a CA-125 drawn following their positive COVID-19 test. Of these 78 patients, 18 had both gynecologic malignancy and more than one CA-125 drawn. Of these 18 patients, only one had an appreciable rise in their CA-125 values at the time of their COVID-19 diagnosis that resolved following their infection and could not be attributed to disease progression. Four patients were diagnosed with cancer at the time of COVID-19 diagnosis and had elevated CA-125 values. One patient passed before receiving treatment, and the other three had CA-125 values that trended down as they received treatment for their cancer. Two patients were noted to have a mild rise in their CA-125 at the time of their COVID-19 infection that continued to rise as they were diagnosed with the progression of their cancer. Most of the 18 patients (
n
=11, 61.1%) did not show an increase in CA-125 coinciding with their COVID-19 infection. They had either stable or decreasing CA-125 at the time of and following their COVID-19 diagnosis.
Conclusions:
This case series illustrates that while CA-125 values may increase during acute COVID-19 infection, cancer remains the most likely cause of a CA-125 increase. Clinical suspicion should remain high for a possible change in cancer status.</abstract><pub>Elsevier Inc</pub><doi>10.1016/S0090-8258(22)01635-3</doi><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0090-8258 |
ispartof | Gynecologic oncology, 2022-08, Vol.166, p.S209-S209 |
issn | 0090-8258 1095-6859 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_9462872 |
source | Access via ScienceDirect (Elsevier) |
title | CA-125 monitoring in gynecologic cancer patients with COVID-19: A case series (413) |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-12T19%3A01%3A37IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-pubmedcentral_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=CA-125%20monitoring%20in%20gynecologic%20cancer%20patients%20with%20COVID-19:%20A%20case%20series%20(413)&rft.jtitle=Gynecologic%20oncology&rft.au=Mumford,%20Brigid&rft.date=2022-08&rft.volume=166&rft.spage=S209&rft.epage=S209&rft.pages=S209-S209&rft.issn=0090-8258&rft.eissn=1095-6859&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/S0090-8258(22)01635-3&rft_dat=%3Cpubmedcentral_cross%3Epubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_9462872%3C/pubmedcentral_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |