Comparison between the IT-MAIS and MUSS questionnaires with video-recording for evaluation of children who may receive a cochlear implantation
There is a great difficulty in determining earlier on which children would benefit or not from cochlear implants, especially because of their young age, the responses they give are very subtle. To compare results obtained through video-recording of the interactions of children who may receive a coch...
Gespeichert in:
| Veröffentlicht in: | Brazilian journal of otorhinolaryngology 2008-01, Vol.74 (1), p.91-98 |
|---|---|
| Hauptverfasser: | , , |
| Format: | Artikel |
| Sprache: | eng |
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
| Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
| container_end_page | 98 |
|---|---|
| container_issue | 1 |
| container_start_page | 91 |
| container_title | Brazilian journal of otorhinolaryngology |
| container_volume | 74 |
| creator | Pinto, Elaine Soares Monteiro Lacerda, Cristina Broglia de Feitosa Porto, Paulo Rogério Catanhede |
| description | There is a great difficulty in determining earlier on which children would benefit or not from cochlear implants, especially because of their young age, the responses they give are very subtle.
To compare results obtained through video-recording of the interactions of children who may receive a cochlear implant with the results obtained through evaluation protocols.
Seven children, with an average age of 39.7 months, with profound hearing loss were selected for the study. IT-MAIS and MUSS questionnaires were given to their parents/guardians of these children and the results were compared with the observation of the video-recordings.
It was possible to observe that the data is compatible with the auditory stages. However, the MUSS questionnaire data gathered during playful activities is very different. The questionnaire only takes into consideration the use of verbal language and therefore the majority of the evaluated children inevitably score low.
Observing children play allows us to trace a better profile of linguistic behavior and aspects relative to language, that may presented differences in the questionnaire. |
| doi_str_mv | 10.1016/S1808-8694(15)30757-6 |
| format | Article |
| fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_9450592</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S1808869415307576</els_id><sourcerecordid>70480589</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3106-6ed1f22150cf77ce80e93cb66f7a94029235c67f2aa0d46f97c792992144bb973</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkctu1DAUhi0Eou3AI4C8QnQRsJP4tqGqRlxGasVi2rXlOCeNUWIPdiajvgTPjOeiAitWtuzv_Mc-H0JvKPlACeUf11QSWUiu6veUXVZEMFHwZ-j8dCz586e9qs_QRUo_COEicy_RGZWVKhmR5-jXMowbE10KHjcw7QA8nnrAq7vi9nq1xsa3-PZ-vcY_t5AmF7w3LkLCOzf1eHYthCKCDbF1_gF3IWKYzbA1exKHDtveDW3Mmbs-4NE84gyDmwEbbIPtBzARu3EzGD8dal6hF50ZErw-rQt0_-Xz3fJbcfP962p5fVPYihJecGhpV5aUEdsJYUESUJVtOO-EUTUpVVkxy0VXGkPamndKWKFKpUpa102jRLVAn465m20zQmvBT9EMehPdaOKjDsbpf2-86_VDmLWqGWE5foHenQJiOIxGjy5ZGPJPIGyTFqSWhEmVQXYEbQwpReiemlCi9yb1waTea9KU6YNJzXPd279f-KfqpC4DV0cA8pxmB1En68BbaLMgO-k2uP-0-A0YLLET</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>70480589</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Comparison between the IT-MAIS and MUSS questionnaires with video-recording for evaluation of children who may receive a cochlear implantation</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</source><source>PubMed Central</source><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><creator>Pinto, Elaine Soares Monteiro ; Lacerda, Cristina Broglia de Feitosa ; Porto, Paulo Rogério Catanhede</creator><creatorcontrib>Pinto, Elaine Soares Monteiro ; Lacerda, Cristina Broglia de Feitosa ; Porto, Paulo Rogério Catanhede</creatorcontrib><description>There is a great difficulty in determining earlier on which children would benefit or not from cochlear implants, especially because of their young age, the responses they give are very subtle.
To compare results obtained through video-recording of the interactions of children who may receive a cochlear implant with the results obtained through evaluation protocols.
Seven children, with an average age of 39.7 months, with profound hearing loss were selected for the study. IT-MAIS and MUSS questionnaires were given to their parents/guardians of these children and the results were compared with the observation of the video-recordings.
It was possible to observe that the data is compatible with the auditory stages. However, the MUSS questionnaire data gathered during playful activities is very different. The questionnaire only takes into consideration the use of verbal language and therefore the majority of the evaluated children inevitably score low.
Observing children play allows us to trace a better profile of linguistic behavior and aspects relative to language, that may presented differences in the questionnaire.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1808-8694</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1808-8686</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/S1808-8694(15)30757-6</identifier><identifier>PMID: 18392508</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Brazil: Elsevier Editora Ltda</publisher><subject>Audiometry, Pure-Tone ; Child, Preschool ; cochlear implant ; Cochlear Implantation ; direct observation ; Female ; Hearing Loss, Bilateral - rehabilitation ; Hearing Loss, Sensorineural - rehabilitation ; Humans ; Male ; muss questionnaire ; Original ; Patient Selection ; potential users ; protocols ; Speech Perception ; Surveys and Questionnaires</subject><ispartof>Brazilian journal of otorhinolaryngology, 2008-01, Vol.74 (1), p.91-98</ispartof><rights>2008 Associação Brasileira de Otorrinolaringologia e Cirurgia Cérvico-Facial</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3106-6ed1f22150cf77ce80e93cb66f7a94029235c67f2aa0d46f97c792992144bb973</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3106-6ed1f22150cf77ce80e93cb66f7a94029235c67f2aa0d46f97c792992144bb973</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9450592/pdf/$$EPDF$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9450592/$$EHTML$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,727,780,784,864,885,27924,27925,53791,53793</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18392508$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Pinto, Elaine Soares Monteiro</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lacerda, Cristina Broglia de Feitosa</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Porto, Paulo Rogério Catanhede</creatorcontrib><title>Comparison between the IT-MAIS and MUSS questionnaires with video-recording for evaluation of children who may receive a cochlear implantation</title><title>Brazilian journal of otorhinolaryngology</title><addtitle>Braz J Otorhinolaryngol</addtitle><description>There is a great difficulty in determining earlier on which children would benefit or not from cochlear implants, especially because of their young age, the responses they give are very subtle.
To compare results obtained through video-recording of the interactions of children who may receive a cochlear implant with the results obtained through evaluation protocols.
Seven children, with an average age of 39.7 months, with profound hearing loss were selected for the study. IT-MAIS and MUSS questionnaires were given to their parents/guardians of these children and the results were compared with the observation of the video-recordings.
It was possible to observe that the data is compatible with the auditory stages. However, the MUSS questionnaire data gathered during playful activities is very different. The questionnaire only takes into consideration the use of verbal language and therefore the majority of the evaluated children inevitably score low.
Observing children play allows us to trace a better profile of linguistic behavior and aspects relative to language, that may presented differences in the questionnaire.</description><subject>Audiometry, Pure-Tone</subject><subject>Child, Preschool</subject><subject>cochlear implant</subject><subject>Cochlear Implantation</subject><subject>direct observation</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Hearing Loss, Bilateral - rehabilitation</subject><subject>Hearing Loss, Sensorineural - rehabilitation</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>muss questionnaire</subject><subject>Original</subject><subject>Patient Selection</subject><subject>potential users</subject><subject>protocols</subject><subject>Speech Perception</subject><subject>Surveys and Questionnaires</subject><issn>1808-8694</issn><issn>1808-8686</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2008</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNqFkctu1DAUhi0Eou3AI4C8QnQRsJP4tqGqRlxGasVi2rXlOCeNUWIPdiajvgTPjOeiAitWtuzv_Mc-H0JvKPlACeUf11QSWUiu6veUXVZEMFHwZ-j8dCz586e9qs_QRUo_COEicy_RGZWVKhmR5-jXMowbE10KHjcw7QA8nnrAq7vi9nq1xsa3-PZ-vcY_t5AmF7w3LkLCOzf1eHYthCKCDbF1_gF3IWKYzbA1exKHDtveDW3Mmbs-4NE84gyDmwEbbIPtBzARu3EzGD8dal6hF50ZErw-rQt0_-Xz3fJbcfP962p5fVPYihJecGhpV5aUEdsJYUESUJVtOO-EUTUpVVkxy0VXGkPamndKWKFKpUpa102jRLVAn465m20zQmvBT9EMehPdaOKjDsbpf2-86_VDmLWqGWE5foHenQJiOIxGjy5ZGPJPIGyTFqSWhEmVQXYEbQwpReiemlCi9yb1waTea9KU6YNJzXPd279f-KfqpC4DV0cA8pxmB1En68BbaLMgO-k2uP-0-A0YLLET</recordid><startdate>200801</startdate><enddate>200801</enddate><creator>Pinto, Elaine Soares Monteiro</creator><creator>Lacerda, Cristina Broglia de Feitosa</creator><creator>Porto, Paulo Rogério Catanhede</creator><general>Elsevier Editora Ltda</general><general>Elsevier</general><scope>6I.</scope><scope>AAFTH</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope></search><sort><creationdate>200801</creationdate><title>Comparison between the IT-MAIS and MUSS questionnaires with video-recording for evaluation of children who may receive a cochlear implantation</title><author>Pinto, Elaine Soares Monteiro ; Lacerda, Cristina Broglia de Feitosa ; Porto, Paulo Rogério Catanhede</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3106-6ed1f22150cf77ce80e93cb66f7a94029235c67f2aa0d46f97c792992144bb973</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2008</creationdate><topic>Audiometry, Pure-Tone</topic><topic>Child, Preschool</topic><topic>cochlear implant</topic><topic>Cochlear Implantation</topic><topic>direct observation</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Hearing Loss, Bilateral - rehabilitation</topic><topic>Hearing Loss, Sensorineural - rehabilitation</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>muss questionnaire</topic><topic>Original</topic><topic>Patient Selection</topic><topic>potential users</topic><topic>protocols</topic><topic>Speech Perception</topic><topic>Surveys and Questionnaires</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Pinto, Elaine Soares Monteiro</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lacerda, Cristina Broglia de Feitosa</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Porto, Paulo Rogério Catanhede</creatorcontrib><collection>ScienceDirect Open Access Titles</collection><collection>Elsevier:ScienceDirect:Open Access</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>Brazilian journal of otorhinolaryngology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Pinto, Elaine Soares Monteiro</au><au>Lacerda, Cristina Broglia de Feitosa</au><au>Porto, Paulo Rogério Catanhede</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Comparison between the IT-MAIS and MUSS questionnaires with video-recording for evaluation of children who may receive a cochlear implantation</atitle><jtitle>Brazilian journal of otorhinolaryngology</jtitle><addtitle>Braz J Otorhinolaryngol</addtitle><date>2008-01</date><risdate>2008</risdate><volume>74</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>91</spage><epage>98</epage><pages>91-98</pages><issn>1808-8694</issn><eissn>1808-8686</eissn><abstract>There is a great difficulty in determining earlier on which children would benefit or not from cochlear implants, especially because of their young age, the responses they give are very subtle.
To compare results obtained through video-recording of the interactions of children who may receive a cochlear implant with the results obtained through evaluation protocols.
Seven children, with an average age of 39.7 months, with profound hearing loss were selected for the study. IT-MAIS and MUSS questionnaires were given to their parents/guardians of these children and the results were compared with the observation of the video-recordings.
It was possible to observe that the data is compatible with the auditory stages. However, the MUSS questionnaire data gathered during playful activities is very different. The questionnaire only takes into consideration the use of verbal language and therefore the majority of the evaluated children inevitably score low.
Observing children play allows us to trace a better profile of linguistic behavior and aspects relative to language, that may presented differences in the questionnaire.</abstract><cop>Brazil</cop><pub>Elsevier Editora Ltda</pub><pmid>18392508</pmid><doi>10.1016/S1808-8694(15)30757-6</doi><tpages>8</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
| fulltext | fulltext |
| identifier | ISSN: 1808-8694 |
| ispartof | Brazilian journal of otorhinolaryngology, 2008-01, Vol.74 (1), p.91-98 |
| issn | 1808-8694 1808-8686 |
| language | eng |
| recordid | cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_9450592 |
| source | MEDLINE; DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals; PubMed Central; Alma/SFX Local Collection |
| subjects | Audiometry, Pure-Tone Child, Preschool cochlear implant Cochlear Implantation direct observation Female Hearing Loss, Bilateral - rehabilitation Hearing Loss, Sensorineural - rehabilitation Humans Male muss questionnaire Original Patient Selection potential users protocols Speech Perception Surveys and Questionnaires |
| title | Comparison between the IT-MAIS and MUSS questionnaires with video-recording for evaluation of children who may receive a cochlear implantation |
| url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-24T11%3A59%3A33IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Comparison%20between%20the%20IT-MAIS%20and%20MUSS%20questionnaires%20with%20video-recording%20for%20evaluation%20of%20children%20who%20may%20receive%20a%20cochlear%20implantation&rft.jtitle=Brazilian%20journal%20of%20otorhinolaryngology&rft.au=Pinto,%20Elaine%20Soares%20Monteiro&rft.date=2008-01&rft.volume=74&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=91&rft.epage=98&rft.pages=91-98&rft.issn=1808-8694&rft.eissn=1808-8686&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/S1808-8694(15)30757-6&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E70480589%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=70480589&rft_id=info:pmid/18392508&rft_els_id=S1808869415307576&rfr_iscdi=true |