Mokken Scale Analysis of Lifetime Responses on the Columbia Suicide Severity Rating Scale’s Severity of Ideation Subscale

Suicide risk screening assumes that suicidal thoughts and behaviors exist on a continuous, hierarchical spectrum with some suicidal thoughts implicated with greater risk for suicidal behaviors. However, screening measures based on the hierarchical model may not capture the suicide risk construct. Th...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Assessment (Odessa, Fla.) Fla.), 2021-09, Vol.28 (6), p.1624-1634
Hauptverfasser: Tabares, Jeffrey V., Butner, Jonathan E., Bryan, Craig J., A. Harris, Julia
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 1634
container_issue 6
container_start_page 1624
container_title Assessment (Odessa, Fla.)
container_volume 28
creator Tabares, Jeffrey V.
Butner, Jonathan E.
Bryan, Craig J.
A. Harris, Julia
description Suicide risk screening assumes that suicidal thoughts and behaviors exist on a continuous, hierarchical spectrum with some suicidal thoughts implicated with greater risk for suicidal behaviors. However, screening measures based on the hierarchical model may not capture the suicide risk construct. This study assessed psychometric properties of the Columbia Suicide Severity Rating Scale (CSSRS) for (a) between- and within-person measurement dimensions, (b) item utility in capturing the suicide risk construct, and (c) tenability of a hierarchical risk model. We found that the CSSRS functions differentially between and within individuals, CSSRS items capture more suicide risk construct, and that CSSRS items in current practice likely appear in the correct order. The current CSSRS reasonably represents within-person suicide risk, but not between-person risk. Scale norms or alternate scoring could facilitate functional equivalence and utility for between- and within-person CSSRS dimensions.
doi_str_mv 10.1177/1073191120913626
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_9447347</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sage_id>10.1177_1073191120913626</sage_id><sourcerecordid>2393574603</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c434t-4edb079fc69df6841e3f6b52fb73acf3d633b044d39680da9c7a008ac0adcada3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kU9rHCEYh6W0NOm295yCx14m1dHR8VIIS_7BlkC2PYujrxuTmXE7zgSWXPI1-vX6SeqyadIGAoLi83sfhR9CB5QcUSrlF0oko4rSkijKRCneoH1aVWXBeK3e5nPGxZbvoQ8p3RBCK6Hq92iPlYwKyeU-uv8Wb2-hx0trWsDHvWk3KSQcPV4ED2PoAF9BWsc-Qb7t8XgNeB7bqWuCwcsp2OAAL-EOhjBu8JUZQ7_ayX4__ErPJAsvHGScHcupSdvER_TOmzbBp8d9hn6cnnyfnxeLy7OL-fGisJzxseDgGiKVt0I5L2pOgXnRVKVvJDPWMycYawjnjilRE2eUlYaQ2lhinDXOsBn6uvOup6YDZ6EfB9Pq9RA6M2x0NEH_T_pwrVfxTivOJctrhj4_Cob4c4I06i4kC21reohT0iVTrJJcEJajZBe1Q0xpAP_0DCV625l-2VkeOfz3e08Df0vKgWIXSGYF-iZOQ64pvS78A2sgooU</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2393574603</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Mokken Scale Analysis of Lifetime Responses on the Columbia Suicide Severity Rating Scale’s Severity of Ideation Subscale</title><source>SAGE Complete A-Z List</source><creator>Tabares, Jeffrey V. ; Butner, Jonathan E. ; Bryan, Craig J. ; A. Harris, Julia</creator><creatorcontrib>Tabares, Jeffrey V. ; Butner, Jonathan E. ; Bryan, Craig J. ; A. Harris, Julia</creatorcontrib><description>Suicide risk screening assumes that suicidal thoughts and behaviors exist on a continuous, hierarchical spectrum with some suicidal thoughts implicated with greater risk for suicidal behaviors. However, screening measures based on the hierarchical model may not capture the suicide risk construct. This study assessed psychometric properties of the Columbia Suicide Severity Rating Scale (CSSRS) for (a) between- and within-person measurement dimensions, (b) item utility in capturing the suicide risk construct, and (c) tenability of a hierarchical risk model. We found that the CSSRS functions differentially between and within individuals, CSSRS items capture more suicide risk construct, and that CSSRS items in current practice likely appear in the correct order. The current CSSRS reasonably represents within-person suicide risk, but not between-person risk. Scale norms or alternate scoring could facilitate functional equivalence and utility for between- and within-person CSSRS dimensions.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1073-1911</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1552-3489</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1177/1073191120913626</identifier><identifier>PMID: 32316747</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Los Angeles, CA: SAGE Publications</publisher><ispartof>Assessment (Odessa, Fla.), 2021-09, Vol.28 (6), p.1624-1634</ispartof><rights>The Author(s) 2020</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c434t-4edb079fc69df6841e3f6b52fb73acf3d633b044d39680da9c7a008ac0adcada3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c434t-4edb079fc69df6841e3f6b52fb73acf3d633b044d39680da9c7a008ac0adcada3</cites><orcidid>0000-0001-9944-7598</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://journals.sagepub.com/doi/pdf/10.1177/1073191120913626$$EPDF$$P50$$Gsage$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/1073191120913626$$EHTML$$P50$$Gsage$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,777,781,882,21800,27905,27906,43602,43603</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32316747$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Tabares, Jeffrey V.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Butner, Jonathan E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bryan, Craig J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>A. Harris, Julia</creatorcontrib><title>Mokken Scale Analysis of Lifetime Responses on the Columbia Suicide Severity Rating Scale’s Severity of Ideation Subscale</title><title>Assessment (Odessa, Fla.)</title><addtitle>Assessment</addtitle><description>Suicide risk screening assumes that suicidal thoughts and behaviors exist on a continuous, hierarchical spectrum with some suicidal thoughts implicated with greater risk for suicidal behaviors. However, screening measures based on the hierarchical model may not capture the suicide risk construct. This study assessed psychometric properties of the Columbia Suicide Severity Rating Scale (CSSRS) for (a) between- and within-person measurement dimensions, (b) item utility in capturing the suicide risk construct, and (c) tenability of a hierarchical risk model. We found that the CSSRS functions differentially between and within individuals, CSSRS items capture more suicide risk construct, and that CSSRS items in current practice likely appear in the correct order. The current CSSRS reasonably represents within-person suicide risk, but not between-person risk. Scale norms or alternate scoring could facilitate functional equivalence and utility for between- and within-person CSSRS dimensions.</description><issn>1073-1911</issn><issn>1552-3489</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2021</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp1kU9rHCEYh6W0NOm295yCx14m1dHR8VIIS_7BlkC2PYujrxuTmXE7zgSWXPI1-vX6SeqyadIGAoLi83sfhR9CB5QcUSrlF0oko4rSkijKRCneoH1aVWXBeK3e5nPGxZbvoQ8p3RBCK6Hq92iPlYwKyeU-uv8Wb2-hx0trWsDHvWk3KSQcPV4ED2PoAF9BWsc-Qb7t8XgNeB7bqWuCwcsp2OAAL-EOhjBu8JUZQ7_ayX4__ErPJAsvHGScHcupSdvER_TOmzbBp8d9hn6cnnyfnxeLy7OL-fGisJzxseDgGiKVt0I5L2pOgXnRVKVvJDPWMycYawjnjilRE2eUlYaQ2lhinDXOsBn6uvOup6YDZ6EfB9Pq9RA6M2x0NEH_T_pwrVfxTivOJctrhj4_Cob4c4I06i4kC21reohT0iVTrJJcEJajZBe1Q0xpAP_0DCV625l-2VkeOfz3e08Df0vKgWIXSGYF-iZOQ64pvS78A2sgooU</recordid><startdate>20210901</startdate><enddate>20210901</enddate><creator>Tabares, Jeffrey V.</creator><creator>Butner, Jonathan E.</creator><creator>Bryan, Craig J.</creator><creator>A. Harris, Julia</creator><general>SAGE Publications</general><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9944-7598</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20210901</creationdate><title>Mokken Scale Analysis of Lifetime Responses on the Columbia Suicide Severity Rating Scale’s Severity of Ideation Subscale</title><author>Tabares, Jeffrey V. ; Butner, Jonathan E. ; Bryan, Craig J. ; A. Harris, Julia</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c434t-4edb079fc69df6841e3f6b52fb73acf3d633b044d39680da9c7a008ac0adcada3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2021</creationdate><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Tabares, Jeffrey V.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Butner, Jonathan E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bryan, Craig J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>A. Harris, Julia</creatorcontrib><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>Assessment (Odessa, Fla.)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Tabares, Jeffrey V.</au><au>Butner, Jonathan E.</au><au>Bryan, Craig J.</au><au>A. Harris, Julia</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Mokken Scale Analysis of Lifetime Responses on the Columbia Suicide Severity Rating Scale’s Severity of Ideation Subscale</atitle><jtitle>Assessment (Odessa, Fla.)</jtitle><addtitle>Assessment</addtitle><date>2021-09-01</date><risdate>2021</risdate><volume>28</volume><issue>6</issue><spage>1624</spage><epage>1634</epage><pages>1624-1634</pages><issn>1073-1911</issn><eissn>1552-3489</eissn><abstract>Suicide risk screening assumes that suicidal thoughts and behaviors exist on a continuous, hierarchical spectrum with some suicidal thoughts implicated with greater risk for suicidal behaviors. However, screening measures based on the hierarchical model may not capture the suicide risk construct. This study assessed psychometric properties of the Columbia Suicide Severity Rating Scale (CSSRS) for (a) between- and within-person measurement dimensions, (b) item utility in capturing the suicide risk construct, and (c) tenability of a hierarchical risk model. We found that the CSSRS functions differentially between and within individuals, CSSRS items capture more suicide risk construct, and that CSSRS items in current practice likely appear in the correct order. The current CSSRS reasonably represents within-person suicide risk, but not between-person risk. Scale norms or alternate scoring could facilitate functional equivalence and utility for between- and within-person CSSRS dimensions.</abstract><cop>Los Angeles, CA</cop><pub>SAGE Publications</pub><pmid>32316747</pmid><doi>10.1177/1073191120913626</doi><tpages>11</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9944-7598</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1073-1911
ispartof Assessment (Odessa, Fla.), 2021-09, Vol.28 (6), p.1624-1634
issn 1073-1911
1552-3489
language eng
recordid cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_9447347
source SAGE Complete A-Z List
title Mokken Scale Analysis of Lifetime Responses on the Columbia Suicide Severity Rating Scale’s Severity of Ideation Subscale
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-21T07%3A59%3A10IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Mokken%20Scale%20Analysis%20of%20Lifetime%20Responses%20on%20the%20Columbia%20Suicide%20Severity%20Rating%20Scale%E2%80%99s%20Severity%20of%20Ideation%20Subscale&rft.jtitle=Assessment%20(Odessa,%20Fla.)&rft.au=Tabares,%20Jeffrey%20V.&rft.date=2021-09-01&rft.volume=28&rft.issue=6&rft.spage=1624&rft.epage=1634&rft.pages=1624-1634&rft.issn=1073-1911&rft.eissn=1552-3489&rft_id=info:doi/10.1177/1073191120913626&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E2393574603%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2393574603&rft_id=info:pmid/32316747&rft_sage_id=10.1177_1073191120913626&rfr_iscdi=true