Measuring quality of dying, death and end-of-life care for children and young people: A scoping review of available tools

Background: The circumstances and care provided at the end of a child’s life have a profound impact on family members. Although assessing experiences and outcomes during this time is challenging, healthcare professionals have a responsibility to ensure high quality of care is provided. Aim: To ident...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Palliative Medicine 2022-09, Vol.36 (8), p.1186-1206
Hauptverfasser: Mayland, Catriona R, Sunderland, Katy A, Cooper, Matthew, Taylor, Paul, Powell, Philip A, Zeigler, Lucy, Cox, Vicki, Gilman, Constance, Turner, Nicola, Flemming, Kate, Fraser, Lorna K
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 1206
container_issue 8
container_start_page 1186
container_title Palliative Medicine
container_volume 36
creator Mayland, Catriona R
Sunderland, Katy A
Cooper, Matthew
Taylor, Paul
Powell, Philip A
Zeigler, Lucy
Cox, Vicki
Gilman, Constance
Turner, Nicola
Flemming, Kate
Fraser, Lorna K
description Background: The circumstances and care provided at the end of a child’s life have a profound impact on family members. Although assessing experiences and outcomes during this time is challenging, healthcare professionals have a responsibility to ensure high quality of care is provided. Aim: To identify available tools which measure the quality of dying, death and end-of-life care for children and young people; describe the content, and data on validity and reliability of existing tools. Design: Scoping review was conducted following the Arksey and O’Malley methodological framework. Data sources: Four electronic databases (MEDLINE, EMBASE, CINAHL and PsycINFO) and grey literature were searched for studies published in English (January 2000–June 2021). A review of reference lists and citation searching was also undertaken. Tools needed to include a focus on the ‘dying’ phase of illness (defined as the last month of life). Results: From 2078 articles, a total of 18 studies, reporting on 11 tools were identified. All tools were completed by primary caregivers or healthcare professionals as ‘proxy’ assessments; all except one was undertaken after death. Question items about quality of life and preparation for death were found in all tools; items relating to cultural aspects of care, grief and financial costs were less common. Only 6/11 had undergone psychometric testing within a paediatric palliative care setting. Conclusions: Future research should include ways to adapt, refine and improve existing tools. Assessing their wider application in different clinical and cultural settings and conducting further psychometric assessment represent areas of focus.
doi_str_mv 10.1177/02692163221105599
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_9446433</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sage_id>10.1177_02692163221105599</sage_id><sourcerecordid>2697367507</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c443t-2e9371f656e791fbd16e96f308d26579c204bc2bfd92c3b026c5b11e9f1afdff3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kU1rFTEUhoMo9lr9Ae4Cblw4NR8zSeNCKEWrUHGj4C5kkpN7U3In02Tmlvn3ZrylouLqQM7zPpyTg9BLSs4olfItYUIxKjhjlJKuU-oR2tBWyoZw8uMx2qz9ZgVO0LNSbgihnIj2KTrhnaJdJ-gGLV_AlDmHYYtvZxPDtODksVvqwxvswEw7bAaHYXBN8k0MHrA1GbBPGdtdiC7D8ItY0lwdI6Qxwjt8gYtN42rNcAhwt0rNwYRo-gh4SimW5-iJN7HAi_t6ir5__PDt8lNz_fXq8-XFdWPblk8NA8Ul9aITIBX1vaMClPCcnDsmOqksI21vWe-dYpb3dWXb9ZSC8tR45z0_Re-P3nHu9-AsDFM2UY857E1edDJB_9kZwk5v00GrthUt51Xw-l6Q0-0MZdL7UCzEaAZIc9H1kyUXsiOyoq_-Qm_SnIe6nmaSKEkEYeeVokfK5lRKBv8wDCV6Paz-57A1c3bMFLOF39b_B34CtBWifw</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2709706028</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Measuring quality of dying, death and end-of-life care for children and young people: A scoping review of available tools</title><source>Access via SAGE</source><source>Applied Social Sciences Index &amp; Abstracts (ASSIA)</source><creator>Mayland, Catriona R ; Sunderland, Katy A ; Cooper, Matthew ; Taylor, Paul ; Powell, Philip A ; Zeigler, Lucy ; Cox, Vicki ; Gilman, Constance ; Turner, Nicola ; Flemming, Kate ; Fraser, Lorna K</creator><creatorcontrib>Mayland, Catriona R ; Sunderland, Katy A ; Cooper, Matthew ; Taylor, Paul ; Powell, Philip A ; Zeigler, Lucy ; Cox, Vicki ; Gilman, Constance ; Turner, Nicola ; Flemming, Kate ; Fraser, Lorna K</creatorcontrib><description>Background: The circumstances and care provided at the end of a child’s life have a profound impact on family members. Although assessing experiences and outcomes during this time is challenging, healthcare professionals have a responsibility to ensure high quality of care is provided. Aim: To identify available tools which measure the quality of dying, death and end-of-life care for children and young people; describe the content, and data on validity and reliability of existing tools. Design: Scoping review was conducted following the Arksey and O’Malley methodological framework. Data sources: Four electronic databases (MEDLINE, EMBASE, CINAHL and PsycINFO) and grey literature were searched for studies published in English (January 2000–June 2021). A review of reference lists and citation searching was also undertaken. Tools needed to include a focus on the ‘dying’ phase of illness (defined as the last month of life). Results: From 2078 articles, a total of 18 studies, reporting on 11 tools were identified. All tools were completed by primary caregivers or healthcare professionals as ‘proxy’ assessments; all except one was undertaken after death. Question items about quality of life and preparation for death were found in all tools; items relating to cultural aspects of care, grief and financial costs were less common. Only 6/11 had undergone psychometric testing within a paediatric palliative care setting. Conclusions: Future research should include ways to adapt, refine and improve existing tools. Assessing their wider application in different clinical and cultural settings and conducting further psychometric assessment represent areas of focus.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0269-2163</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1477-030X</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1177/02692163221105599</identifier><identifier>PMID: 35915561</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>London, England: SAGE Publications</publisher><subject>Caregivers ; Children ; Clinical assessment ; Cultural differences ; Cultural factors ; Death &amp; dying ; End of life decisions ; Grief ; Health care expenditures ; Hospice care ; Medical personnel ; Palliative care ; Pediatrics ; Quality of care ; Quality of life ; Quantitative psychology ; Relatives ; Reliability ; Review ; Teenagers ; Youth</subject><ispartof>Palliative Medicine, 2022-09, Vol.36 (8), p.1186-1206</ispartof><rights>The Author(s) 2022</rights><rights>The Author(s) 2022 2022 SAGE Publications</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c443t-2e9371f656e791fbd16e96f308d26579c204bc2bfd92c3b026c5b11e9f1afdff3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c443t-2e9371f656e791fbd16e96f308d26579c204bc2bfd92c3b026c5b11e9f1afdff3</cites><orcidid>0000-0001-9563-5014 ; 0000-0002-0870-8324 ; 0000-0002-1440-9953 ; 0000-0003-0073-260X ; 0000-0001-9140-4972 ; 0000-0002-0795-8516 ; 0000-0002-1360-4191</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://journals.sagepub.com/doi/pdf/10.1177/02692163221105599$$EPDF$$P50$$Gsage$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/02692163221105599$$EHTML$$P50$$Gsage$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,313,314,780,784,792,885,21819,27922,27924,27925,30999,43621,43622</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Mayland, Catriona R</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sunderland, Katy A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cooper, Matthew</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Taylor, Paul</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Powell, Philip A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zeigler, Lucy</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cox, Vicki</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gilman, Constance</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Turner, Nicola</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Flemming, Kate</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fraser, Lorna K</creatorcontrib><title>Measuring quality of dying, death and end-of-life care for children and young people: A scoping review of available tools</title><title>Palliative Medicine</title><addtitle>Palliat Med</addtitle><description>Background: The circumstances and care provided at the end of a child’s life have a profound impact on family members. Although assessing experiences and outcomes during this time is challenging, healthcare professionals have a responsibility to ensure high quality of care is provided. Aim: To identify available tools which measure the quality of dying, death and end-of-life care for children and young people; describe the content, and data on validity and reliability of existing tools. Design: Scoping review was conducted following the Arksey and O’Malley methodological framework. Data sources: Four electronic databases (MEDLINE, EMBASE, CINAHL and PsycINFO) and grey literature were searched for studies published in English (January 2000–June 2021). A review of reference lists and citation searching was also undertaken. Tools needed to include a focus on the ‘dying’ phase of illness (defined as the last month of life). Results: From 2078 articles, a total of 18 studies, reporting on 11 tools were identified. All tools were completed by primary caregivers or healthcare professionals as ‘proxy’ assessments; all except one was undertaken after death. Question items about quality of life and preparation for death were found in all tools; items relating to cultural aspects of care, grief and financial costs were less common. Only 6/11 had undergone psychometric testing within a paediatric palliative care setting. Conclusions: Future research should include ways to adapt, refine and improve existing tools. Assessing their wider application in different clinical and cultural settings and conducting further psychometric assessment represent areas of focus.</description><subject>Caregivers</subject><subject>Children</subject><subject>Clinical assessment</subject><subject>Cultural differences</subject><subject>Cultural factors</subject><subject>Death &amp; dying</subject><subject>End of life decisions</subject><subject>Grief</subject><subject>Health care expenditures</subject><subject>Hospice care</subject><subject>Medical personnel</subject><subject>Palliative care</subject><subject>Pediatrics</subject><subject>Quality of care</subject><subject>Quality of life</subject><subject>Quantitative psychology</subject><subject>Relatives</subject><subject>Reliability</subject><subject>Review</subject><subject>Teenagers</subject><subject>Youth</subject><issn>0269-2163</issn><issn>1477-030X</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2022</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>AFRWT</sourceid><sourceid>7QJ</sourceid><recordid>eNp1kU1rFTEUhoMo9lr9Ae4Cblw4NR8zSeNCKEWrUHGj4C5kkpN7U3In02Tmlvn3ZrylouLqQM7zPpyTg9BLSs4olfItYUIxKjhjlJKuU-oR2tBWyoZw8uMx2qz9ZgVO0LNSbgihnIj2KTrhnaJdJ-gGLV_AlDmHYYtvZxPDtODksVvqwxvswEw7bAaHYXBN8k0MHrA1GbBPGdtdiC7D8ItY0lwdI6Qxwjt8gYtN42rNcAhwt0rNwYRo-gh4SimW5-iJN7HAi_t6ir5__PDt8lNz_fXq8-XFdWPblk8NA8Ul9aITIBX1vaMClPCcnDsmOqksI21vWe-dYpb3dWXb9ZSC8tR45z0_Re-P3nHu9-AsDFM2UY857E1edDJB_9kZwk5v00GrthUt51Xw-l6Q0-0MZdL7UCzEaAZIc9H1kyUXsiOyoq_-Qm_SnIe6nmaSKEkEYeeVokfK5lRKBv8wDCV6Paz-57A1c3bMFLOF39b_B34CtBWifw</recordid><startdate>20220901</startdate><enddate>20220901</enddate><creator>Mayland, Catriona R</creator><creator>Sunderland, Katy A</creator><creator>Cooper, Matthew</creator><creator>Taylor, Paul</creator><creator>Powell, Philip A</creator><creator>Zeigler, Lucy</creator><creator>Cox, Vicki</creator><creator>Gilman, Constance</creator><creator>Turner, Nicola</creator><creator>Flemming, Kate</creator><creator>Fraser, Lorna K</creator><general>SAGE Publications</general><general>Sage Publications Ltd</general><scope>AFRWT</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QJ</scope><scope>ASE</scope><scope>FPQ</scope><scope>K6X</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9563-5014</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0870-8324</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1440-9953</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0073-260X</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9140-4972</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0795-8516</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1360-4191</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20220901</creationdate><title>Measuring quality of dying, death and end-of-life care for children and young people: A scoping review of available tools</title><author>Mayland, Catriona R ; Sunderland, Katy A ; Cooper, Matthew ; Taylor, Paul ; Powell, Philip A ; Zeigler, Lucy ; Cox, Vicki ; Gilman, Constance ; Turner, Nicola ; Flemming, Kate ; Fraser, Lorna K</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c443t-2e9371f656e791fbd16e96f308d26579c204bc2bfd92c3b026c5b11e9f1afdff3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2022</creationdate><topic>Caregivers</topic><topic>Children</topic><topic>Clinical assessment</topic><topic>Cultural differences</topic><topic>Cultural factors</topic><topic>Death &amp; dying</topic><topic>End of life decisions</topic><topic>Grief</topic><topic>Health care expenditures</topic><topic>Hospice care</topic><topic>Medical personnel</topic><topic>Palliative care</topic><topic>Pediatrics</topic><topic>Quality of care</topic><topic>Quality of life</topic><topic>Quantitative psychology</topic><topic>Relatives</topic><topic>Reliability</topic><topic>Review</topic><topic>Teenagers</topic><topic>Youth</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Mayland, Catriona R</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sunderland, Katy A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cooper, Matthew</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Taylor, Paul</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Powell, Philip A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zeigler, Lucy</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cox, Vicki</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gilman, Constance</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Turner, Nicola</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Flemming, Kate</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fraser, Lorna K</creatorcontrib><collection>Sage Journals GOLD Open Access 2024</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Applied Social Sciences Index &amp; Abstracts (ASSIA)</collection><collection>British Nursing Index</collection><collection>British Nursing Index (BNI) (1985 to Present)</collection><collection>British Nursing Index</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>Palliative Medicine</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Mayland, Catriona R</au><au>Sunderland, Katy A</au><au>Cooper, Matthew</au><au>Taylor, Paul</au><au>Powell, Philip A</au><au>Zeigler, Lucy</au><au>Cox, Vicki</au><au>Gilman, Constance</au><au>Turner, Nicola</au><au>Flemming, Kate</au><au>Fraser, Lorna K</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Measuring quality of dying, death and end-of-life care for children and young people: A scoping review of available tools</atitle><jtitle>Palliative Medicine</jtitle><addtitle>Palliat Med</addtitle><date>2022-09-01</date><risdate>2022</risdate><volume>36</volume><issue>8</issue><spage>1186</spage><epage>1206</epage><pages>1186-1206</pages><issn>0269-2163</issn><eissn>1477-030X</eissn><abstract>Background: The circumstances and care provided at the end of a child’s life have a profound impact on family members. Although assessing experiences and outcomes during this time is challenging, healthcare professionals have a responsibility to ensure high quality of care is provided. Aim: To identify available tools which measure the quality of dying, death and end-of-life care for children and young people; describe the content, and data on validity and reliability of existing tools. Design: Scoping review was conducted following the Arksey and O’Malley methodological framework. Data sources: Four electronic databases (MEDLINE, EMBASE, CINAHL and PsycINFO) and grey literature were searched for studies published in English (January 2000–June 2021). A review of reference lists and citation searching was also undertaken. Tools needed to include a focus on the ‘dying’ phase of illness (defined as the last month of life). Results: From 2078 articles, a total of 18 studies, reporting on 11 tools were identified. All tools were completed by primary caregivers or healthcare professionals as ‘proxy’ assessments; all except one was undertaken after death. Question items about quality of life and preparation for death were found in all tools; items relating to cultural aspects of care, grief and financial costs were less common. Only 6/11 had undergone psychometric testing within a paediatric palliative care setting. Conclusions: Future research should include ways to adapt, refine and improve existing tools. Assessing their wider application in different clinical and cultural settings and conducting further psychometric assessment represent areas of focus.</abstract><cop>London, England</cop><pub>SAGE Publications</pub><pmid>35915561</pmid><doi>10.1177/02692163221105599</doi><tpages>21</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9563-5014</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0870-8324</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1440-9953</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0073-260X</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9140-4972</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0795-8516</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1360-4191</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0269-2163
ispartof Palliative Medicine, 2022-09, Vol.36 (8), p.1186-1206
issn 0269-2163
1477-030X
language eng
recordid cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_9446433
source Access via SAGE; Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA)
subjects Caregivers
Children
Clinical assessment
Cultural differences
Cultural factors
Death & dying
End of life decisions
Grief
Health care expenditures
Hospice care
Medical personnel
Palliative care
Pediatrics
Quality of care
Quality of life
Quantitative psychology
Relatives
Reliability
Review
Teenagers
Youth
title Measuring quality of dying, death and end-of-life care for children and young people: A scoping review of available tools
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-18T16%3A07%3A51IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Measuring%20quality%20of%20dying,%20death%20and%20end-of-life%20care%20for%20children%20and%20young%20people:%20A%20scoping%20review%20of%20available%20tools&rft.jtitle=Palliative%20Medicine&rft.au=Mayland,%20Catriona%20R&rft.date=2022-09-01&rft.volume=36&rft.issue=8&rft.spage=1186&rft.epage=1206&rft.pages=1186-1206&rft.issn=0269-2163&rft.eissn=1477-030X&rft_id=info:doi/10.1177/02692163221105599&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E2697367507%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2709706028&rft_id=info:pmid/35915561&rft_sage_id=10.1177_02692163221105599&rfr_iscdi=true