P01-11 Economic impact of health-enhancing-physical activity from different settings in France

Abstract Background There is strong evidence of the multiple benefits of physical activity on health in primary, secondary and tertiary prevention (WHO, 2020). However, economic evaluations are still needed to estimate direct and indirect costs that could be saved from various Health-Enhancing Physi...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:European journal of public health 2022-09, Vol.32 (Supplement_2)
Hauptverfasser: Racine, Antoine Noël, Vuillemin, Anne, Meurisse, Bénédicte, Toussaint, Jean-François, Christèle, Gautier
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page
container_issue Supplement_2
container_start_page
container_title European journal of public health
container_volume 32
creator Racine, Antoine Noël
Vuillemin, Anne
Meurisse, Bénédicte
Toussaint, Jean-François
Christèle, Gautier
description Abstract Background There is strong evidence of the multiple benefits of physical activity on health in primary, secondary and tertiary prevention (WHO, 2020). However, economic evaluations are still needed to estimate direct and indirect costs that could be saved from various Health-Enhancing Physical Activity (HEPA) promotion strategies (Ding et al., 2020). Moreover, these savings might be influenced by specificities of the national health system. The aim of this study is to explore the economic impact of HEPA from different settings in France. Methods A systematic scoping review of grey and scientific literature was conducted. Relevant articles were identified through searching from PubMed, ScienceDirect, SportDiscus databases and from google. Searches were conducted in English and French between January 2000 and December 2020. A data extraction template was used to collect, organize and summarize data regarding the following variables: aim of the study, study population, study settings, methods, and main results. Results A total of 17 studies were included from the grey literature (n = 10) and the scientific peer-reviewed literature (n = 7). Data from each variables of interest were heterogeneous, making comparisons difficult. Studies were categorized in 5 types: studies aiming to estimate the cost of physical inactivity or the cost that could be saved from HEPA promotion in general population (n = 8); studies aiming to evaluate the medico-economic impact of a physical activity adapted program (n = 5); studies aiming to assess the economic benefit of active travel in a city (n = 3); study aiming to estimate the economic impact of physical activity from a company and its employee's perspectives (n = 1). Whatever the methods, the study population or the study setting, several tens of millions of euros to several billions of euros could be saved each year by investing in HEPA promotion. Conclusions HEPA promotion can lead to substantial saving. Methods should be standardized to more precisely estimate its extent in different settings in France. This could help policy-makers in their decision to invest in HEPA promotion, especially in phases of epidemics, where sedentarity and physical inactivity account for major health risks.
doi_str_mv 10.1093/eurpub/ckac095.011
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_9435635</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><oup_id>10.1093/eurpub/ckac095.011</oup_id><sourcerecordid>2710110856</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c2421-24208ba7c5050bdcf7d5f20567cd5a461387b35f337517430f2f307a11e71a503</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNUU1r3DAQFaWBppv8gZ4EPeXgZEayrN1LIYR8wUJyaKE3RStLsdK15Ur2wt4C-af5JdHiJZCeehkNo_feSO8R8g3hFGHBz-wY-3F1Zv5oAwtxCoifyCGWVVnwCn5_zj0CFsgq9oV8TekJAIScs0PycL-b4-vzy6UJXWi9ob7ttRlocLSxej00he0a3RnfPRZ9s03e6DXNAL_xw5a6GFpae-dstN1Akx2GDEzUd_QqZpY9IgdOr5M93p8z8uvq8ufFTbG8u769OF8WhpUMi1xgvtLSCBCwqo2TtXAMRCVNLXRZIZ_LFReOcylQlhwccxykRrQStQA-Iz8m3exDa2uTXxP1WvXRtzpuVdBefbzpfKMew0YtSi4qLrLAySTQ_EO7OV-q3Qy4zJbJcoMZ-32_LIa_o02Degpj7PL_FJPZaYR51pwRNqFMDClF695lEdQuNjXFpvaxqUzMpGIihbH_H_wbkkydlA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2710110856</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>P01-11 Economic impact of health-enhancing-physical activity from different settings in France</title><source>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</source><source>PAIS Index</source><source>Oxford Journals Open Access Collection</source><source>EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals</source><source>PubMed Central</source><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><creator>Racine, Antoine Noël ; Vuillemin, Anne ; Meurisse, Bénédicte ; Toussaint, Jean-François ; Christèle, Gautier</creator><creatorcontrib>Racine, Antoine Noël ; Vuillemin, Anne ; Meurisse, Bénédicte ; Toussaint, Jean-François ; Christèle, Gautier</creatorcontrib><description>Abstract Background There is strong evidence of the multiple benefits of physical activity on health in primary, secondary and tertiary prevention (WHO, 2020). However, economic evaluations are still needed to estimate direct and indirect costs that could be saved from various Health-Enhancing Physical Activity (HEPA) promotion strategies (Ding et al., 2020). Moreover, these savings might be influenced by specificities of the national health system. The aim of this study is to explore the economic impact of HEPA from different settings in France. Methods A systematic scoping review of grey and scientific literature was conducted. Relevant articles were identified through searching from PubMed, ScienceDirect, SportDiscus databases and from google. Searches were conducted in English and French between January 2000 and December 2020. A data extraction template was used to collect, organize and summarize data regarding the following variables: aim of the study, study population, study settings, methods, and main results. Results A total of 17 studies were included from the grey literature (n = 10) and the scientific peer-reviewed literature (n = 7). Data from each variables of interest were heterogeneous, making comparisons difficult. Studies were categorized in 5 types: studies aiming to estimate the cost of physical inactivity or the cost that could be saved from HEPA promotion in general population (n = 8); studies aiming to evaluate the medico-economic impact of a physical activity adapted program (n = 5); studies aiming to assess the economic benefit of active travel in a city (n = 3); study aiming to estimate the economic impact of physical activity from a company and its employee's perspectives (n = 1). Whatever the methods, the study population or the study setting, several tens of millions of euros to several billions of euros could be saved each year by investing in HEPA promotion. Conclusions HEPA promotion can lead to substantial saving. Methods should be standardized to more precisely estimate its extent in different settings in France. This could help policy-makers in their decision to invest in HEPA promotion, especially in phases of epidemics, where sedentarity and physical inactivity account for major health risks.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1101-1262</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1464-360X</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1093/eurpub/ckac095.011</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Oxford: Oxford University Press</publisher><subject>Cost control ; Costs ; Data ; Economic impact ; Economics ; Epidemics ; Evaluation ; Exercise ; Health education ; Health risks ; Impact analysis ; Physical activity ; Physical fitness ; Policy making ; Population studies ; Poster Presentations ; Prevention ; Public health ; Quantitative Finance ; Search engines</subject><ispartof>European journal of public health, 2022-09, Vol.32 (Supplement_2)</ispartof><rights>The Author(s) 2022. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the European Public Health Association. 2022</rights><rights>The Author(s) 2022. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the European Public Health Association.</rights><rights>Distributed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><orcidid>0000-0002-0411-2363 ; 0000-0002-5778-0285</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9435635/pdf/$$EPDF$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9435635/$$EHTML$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,723,776,780,860,881,1598,27845,27903,27904,53770,53772</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://univ-cotedazur.hal.science/hal-03778274$$DView record in HAL$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Racine, Antoine Noël</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Vuillemin, Anne</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Meurisse, Bénédicte</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Toussaint, Jean-François</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Christèle, Gautier</creatorcontrib><title>P01-11 Economic impact of health-enhancing-physical activity from different settings in France</title><title>European journal of public health</title><description>Abstract Background There is strong evidence of the multiple benefits of physical activity on health in primary, secondary and tertiary prevention (WHO, 2020). However, economic evaluations are still needed to estimate direct and indirect costs that could be saved from various Health-Enhancing Physical Activity (HEPA) promotion strategies (Ding et al., 2020). Moreover, these savings might be influenced by specificities of the national health system. The aim of this study is to explore the economic impact of HEPA from different settings in France. Methods A systematic scoping review of grey and scientific literature was conducted. Relevant articles were identified through searching from PubMed, ScienceDirect, SportDiscus databases and from google. Searches were conducted in English and French between January 2000 and December 2020. A data extraction template was used to collect, organize and summarize data regarding the following variables: aim of the study, study population, study settings, methods, and main results. Results A total of 17 studies were included from the grey literature (n = 10) and the scientific peer-reviewed literature (n = 7). Data from each variables of interest were heterogeneous, making comparisons difficult. Studies were categorized in 5 types: studies aiming to estimate the cost of physical inactivity or the cost that could be saved from HEPA promotion in general population (n = 8); studies aiming to evaluate the medico-economic impact of a physical activity adapted program (n = 5); studies aiming to assess the economic benefit of active travel in a city (n = 3); study aiming to estimate the economic impact of physical activity from a company and its employee's perspectives (n = 1). Whatever the methods, the study population or the study setting, several tens of millions of euros to several billions of euros could be saved each year by investing in HEPA promotion. Conclusions HEPA promotion can lead to substantial saving. Methods should be standardized to more precisely estimate its extent in different settings in France. This could help policy-makers in their decision to invest in HEPA promotion, especially in phases of epidemics, where sedentarity and physical inactivity account for major health risks.</description><subject>Cost control</subject><subject>Costs</subject><subject>Data</subject><subject>Economic impact</subject><subject>Economics</subject><subject>Epidemics</subject><subject>Evaluation</subject><subject>Exercise</subject><subject>Health education</subject><subject>Health risks</subject><subject>Impact analysis</subject><subject>Physical activity</subject><subject>Physical fitness</subject><subject>Policy making</subject><subject>Population studies</subject><subject>Poster Presentations</subject><subject>Prevention</subject><subject>Public health</subject><subject>Quantitative Finance</subject><subject>Search engines</subject><issn>1101-1262</issn><issn>1464-360X</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2022</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>TOX</sourceid><sourceid>7TQ</sourceid><recordid>eNqNUU1r3DAQFaWBppv8gZ4EPeXgZEayrN1LIYR8wUJyaKE3RStLsdK15Ur2wt4C-af5JdHiJZCeehkNo_feSO8R8g3hFGHBz-wY-3F1Zv5oAwtxCoifyCGWVVnwCn5_zj0CFsgq9oV8TekJAIScs0PycL-b4-vzy6UJXWi9ob7ttRlocLSxej00he0a3RnfPRZ9s03e6DXNAL_xw5a6GFpae-dstN1Akx2GDEzUd_QqZpY9IgdOr5M93p8z8uvq8ufFTbG8u769OF8WhpUMi1xgvtLSCBCwqo2TtXAMRCVNLXRZIZ_LFReOcylQlhwccxykRrQStQA-Iz8m3exDa2uTXxP1WvXRtzpuVdBefbzpfKMew0YtSi4qLrLAySTQ_EO7OV-q3Qy4zJbJcoMZ-32_LIa_o02Degpj7PL_FJPZaYR51pwRNqFMDClF695lEdQuNjXFpvaxqUzMpGIihbH_H_wbkkydlA</recordid><startdate>20220901</startdate><enddate>20220901</enddate><creator>Racine, Antoine Noël</creator><creator>Vuillemin, Anne</creator><creator>Meurisse, Bénédicte</creator><creator>Toussaint, Jean-François</creator><creator>Christèle, Gautier</creator><general>Oxford University Press</general><general>Oxford Publishing Limited (England)</general><general>Oxford University Press (OUP): Policy B - Oxford Open Option D</general><scope>TOX</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7T2</scope><scope>7TQ</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>DHY</scope><scope>DON</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>1XC</scope><scope>5PM</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0411-2363</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5778-0285</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20220901</creationdate><title>P01-11 Economic impact of health-enhancing-physical activity from different settings in France</title><author>Racine, Antoine Noël ; Vuillemin, Anne ; Meurisse, Bénédicte ; Toussaint, Jean-François ; Christèle, Gautier</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c2421-24208ba7c5050bdcf7d5f20567cd5a461387b35f337517430f2f307a11e71a503</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2022</creationdate><topic>Cost control</topic><topic>Costs</topic><topic>Data</topic><topic>Economic impact</topic><topic>Economics</topic><topic>Epidemics</topic><topic>Evaluation</topic><topic>Exercise</topic><topic>Health education</topic><topic>Health risks</topic><topic>Impact analysis</topic><topic>Physical activity</topic><topic>Physical fitness</topic><topic>Policy making</topic><topic>Population studies</topic><topic>Poster Presentations</topic><topic>Prevention</topic><topic>Public health</topic><topic>Quantitative Finance</topic><topic>Search engines</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Racine, Antoine Noël</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Vuillemin, Anne</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Meurisse, Bénédicte</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Toussaint, Jean-François</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Christèle, Gautier</creatorcontrib><collection>Oxford Journals Open Access Collection</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Health and Safety Science Abstracts (Full archive)</collection><collection>PAIS Index</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>PAIS International</collection><collection>PAIS International (Ovid)</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>Hyper Article en Ligne (HAL)</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>European journal of public health</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Racine, Antoine Noël</au><au>Vuillemin, Anne</au><au>Meurisse, Bénédicte</au><au>Toussaint, Jean-François</au><au>Christèle, Gautier</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>P01-11 Economic impact of health-enhancing-physical activity from different settings in France</atitle><jtitle>European journal of public health</jtitle><date>2022-09-01</date><risdate>2022</risdate><volume>32</volume><issue>Supplement_2</issue><issn>1101-1262</issn><eissn>1464-360X</eissn><abstract>Abstract Background There is strong evidence of the multiple benefits of physical activity on health in primary, secondary and tertiary prevention (WHO, 2020). However, economic evaluations are still needed to estimate direct and indirect costs that could be saved from various Health-Enhancing Physical Activity (HEPA) promotion strategies (Ding et al., 2020). Moreover, these savings might be influenced by specificities of the national health system. The aim of this study is to explore the economic impact of HEPA from different settings in France. Methods A systematic scoping review of grey and scientific literature was conducted. Relevant articles were identified through searching from PubMed, ScienceDirect, SportDiscus databases and from google. Searches were conducted in English and French between January 2000 and December 2020. A data extraction template was used to collect, organize and summarize data regarding the following variables: aim of the study, study population, study settings, methods, and main results. Results A total of 17 studies were included from the grey literature (n = 10) and the scientific peer-reviewed literature (n = 7). Data from each variables of interest were heterogeneous, making comparisons difficult. Studies were categorized in 5 types: studies aiming to estimate the cost of physical inactivity or the cost that could be saved from HEPA promotion in general population (n = 8); studies aiming to evaluate the medico-economic impact of a physical activity adapted program (n = 5); studies aiming to assess the economic benefit of active travel in a city (n = 3); study aiming to estimate the economic impact of physical activity from a company and its employee's perspectives (n = 1). Whatever the methods, the study population or the study setting, several tens of millions of euros to several billions of euros could be saved each year by investing in HEPA promotion. Conclusions HEPA promotion can lead to substantial saving. Methods should be standardized to more precisely estimate its extent in different settings in France. This could help policy-makers in their decision to invest in HEPA promotion, especially in phases of epidemics, where sedentarity and physical inactivity account for major health risks.</abstract><cop>Oxford</cop><pub>Oxford University Press</pub><doi>10.1093/eurpub/ckac095.011</doi><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0411-2363</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5778-0285</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1101-1262
ispartof European journal of public health, 2022-09, Vol.32 (Supplement_2)
issn 1101-1262
1464-360X
language eng
recordid cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_9435635
source DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals; PAIS Index; Oxford Journals Open Access Collection; EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals; PubMed Central; Alma/SFX Local Collection
subjects Cost control
Costs
Data
Economic impact
Economics
Epidemics
Evaluation
Exercise
Health education
Health risks
Impact analysis
Physical activity
Physical fitness
Policy making
Population studies
Poster Presentations
Prevention
Public health
Quantitative Finance
Search engines
title P01-11 Economic impact of health-enhancing-physical activity from different settings in France
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-22T04%3A21%3A45IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=P01-11%E2%80%83Economic%20impact%20of%20health-enhancing-physical%20activity%20from%20different%20settings%20in%20France&rft.jtitle=European%20journal%20of%20public%20health&rft.au=Racine,%20Antoine%20No%C3%ABl&rft.date=2022-09-01&rft.volume=32&rft.issue=Supplement_2&rft.issn=1101-1262&rft.eissn=1464-360X&rft_id=info:doi/10.1093/eurpub/ckac095.011&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E2710110856%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2710110856&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_oup_id=10.1093/eurpub/ckac095.011&rfr_iscdi=true