Breast cancer incidence in the regions of Belarus and Ukraine most contaminated by the Chernobyl accident: 1978 to 2016
Even 30 years after the accident, an association between breast cancer incidence and ionizing radiation exposure from Chernobyl fallout remains uncertain. We studied breast cancer incidence in the most contaminated regions of Belarus (Gomel and Mogilev) and Ukraine (Kyiv, Zhytomyr and Chernihiv) bef...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | International journal of cancer 2021-04, Vol.148 (8), p.1839-1849 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 1849 |
---|---|
container_issue | 8 |
container_start_page | 1839 |
container_title | International journal of cancer |
container_volume | 148 |
creator | Zupunski, Ljubica Yaumenenka, Alesia Ryzhov, Anton Veyalkin, Ilya Drozdovitch, Vladimir Masiuk, Sergii Ivanova, Olha Kesminiene, Ausrele Pukkala, Eero Moiseev, Pavel Prysyazhnyuk, Anatoly Schüz, Joachim Ostroumova, Evgenia |
description | Even 30 years after the accident, an association between breast cancer incidence and ionizing radiation exposure from Chernobyl fallout remains uncertain. We studied breast cancer incidence in the most contaminated regions of Belarus (Gomel and Mogilev) and Ukraine (Kyiv, Zhytomyr and Chernihiv) before (1978‐1986) and after (1987‐2016) the accident. Breast cancer cases and female population size data were received from the national cancer registries and the state departments of statistics. The study included 85 132 breast cancers with 150 million person‐years at risk. We estimated annual rayon (district)‐average absorbed doses to the breast from external and internal irradiation of the adult female population over the period of 1986‐2016. We studied an association between rayon‐average cumulative absorbed breast dose with 5‐year lag, that is, excluding the exposure in 5 years prior to breast cancer diagnosis, and breast cancer incidence using negative binomial regression models. Mean (median) cumulative breast dose in 2016 was 12.3 (5.0) milligray (mGy) in Belarus and 5.7 (2.3) mGy in Ukraine, with the maximum dose of 55 mGy and 54 mGy, respectively. Breast cancer incidence rates statistically significantly increased with calendar year and attained age, and were higher in urban than in rural residents. Adjusting for time, age and urbanicity effects, we found no evidence of increasing incidence with rayon‐average 5‐year lagged cumulative breast dose. Owing to ecological study design limitations, a case‐control study covering this area with individually reconstructed absorbed breast doses is needed testing for association between low‐dose protracted radiation exposure and breast cancer risk after Chernobyl.
What's new?
The Chernobyl nuclear accident in 1986 exposed various populations, including nearby residents and cleanup workers, to low‐dose ionizing radiation. Here, using national cancer data and data on radionuclide fallout, the authors investigated associations between breast cancer incidence and ionizing radiation exposure in female populations in the most contaminated regions of Belarus and Ukraine following the Chernobyl accident. Analyses indicate that over the period 1986‐2016, breast cancer incidence did not increase in relation to the average 5‐year lagged cumulative breast dose in urban and rural populations. Possible dose misclassification warrants additional investigation via a case‐control study applying individual breast doses. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1002/ijc.33346 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_9426215</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2491761805</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4436-10f6a54d2f5c18ae209afa294c395a84d3ad0de9831bc1c7b36881fdf201964a3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kcFu1DAQhi1ERbeFAy-ALHGhh7Se2HEcDpXoCmhRJS70bE0cp-slsYudUO3b490tFVTqySPNN5_H_gl5C-wUGCvP3Nqccs6FfEEWwJq6YCVUL8ki91hRA5eH5CilNWMAFROvyCHnTAoOfEHuL6LFNFGD3thInTeus7nMFZ1WlkZ764JPNPT0wg4Y50TRd_TmZ0TnLR3Ddjb4CUfncbIdbTe7ueXKRh_azUDR7JTTRwpNregUaMlAviYHPQ7Jvnk4j8nNl88_lpfF9fevV8tP14URgssCWC-xEl3ZVwYU2pI12GPZCMObCpXoOHass43i0BowdculUtB3fb6jkQL5MTnfe-_mdrSdyYtEHPRddCPGjQ7o9P8d71b6NvzWjShl_sUs-PAgiOHXbNOkR5eMHQb0NsxJl6ICVSnFt-j7J-g6zNHn52WqgVqCYlvqZE-ZGFKKtn9cBpjexqlznHoXZ2bf_bv9I_k3vwyc7YF7N9jN8yZ99W25V_4BF9-ouQ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2491761805</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Breast cancer incidence in the regions of Belarus and Ukraine most contaminated by the Chernobyl accident: 1978 to 2016</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete</source><source>Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals</source><creator>Zupunski, Ljubica ; Yaumenenka, Alesia ; Ryzhov, Anton ; Veyalkin, Ilya ; Drozdovitch, Vladimir ; Masiuk, Sergii ; Ivanova, Olha ; Kesminiene, Ausrele ; Pukkala, Eero ; Moiseev, Pavel ; Prysyazhnyuk, Anatoly ; Schüz, Joachim ; Ostroumova, Evgenia</creator><creatorcontrib>Zupunski, Ljubica ; Yaumenenka, Alesia ; Ryzhov, Anton ; Veyalkin, Ilya ; Drozdovitch, Vladimir ; Masiuk, Sergii ; Ivanova, Olha ; Kesminiene, Ausrele ; Pukkala, Eero ; Moiseev, Pavel ; Prysyazhnyuk, Anatoly ; Schüz, Joachim ; Ostroumova, Evgenia</creatorcontrib><description>Even 30 years after the accident, an association between breast cancer incidence and ionizing radiation exposure from Chernobyl fallout remains uncertain. We studied breast cancer incidence in the most contaminated regions of Belarus (Gomel and Mogilev) and Ukraine (Kyiv, Zhytomyr and Chernihiv) before (1978‐1986) and after (1987‐2016) the accident. Breast cancer cases and female population size data were received from the national cancer registries and the state departments of statistics. The study included 85 132 breast cancers with 150 million person‐years at risk. We estimated annual rayon (district)‐average absorbed doses to the breast from external and internal irradiation of the adult female population over the period of 1986‐2016. We studied an association between rayon‐average cumulative absorbed breast dose with 5‐year lag, that is, excluding the exposure in 5 years prior to breast cancer diagnosis, and breast cancer incidence using negative binomial regression models. Mean (median) cumulative breast dose in 2016 was 12.3 (5.0) milligray (mGy) in Belarus and 5.7 (2.3) mGy in Ukraine, with the maximum dose of 55 mGy and 54 mGy, respectively. Breast cancer incidence rates statistically significantly increased with calendar year and attained age, and were higher in urban than in rural residents. Adjusting for time, age and urbanicity effects, we found no evidence of increasing incidence with rayon‐average 5‐year lagged cumulative breast dose. Owing to ecological study design limitations, a case‐control study covering this area with individually reconstructed absorbed breast doses is needed testing for association between low‐dose protracted radiation exposure and breast cancer risk after Chernobyl.
What's new?
The Chernobyl nuclear accident in 1986 exposed various populations, including nearby residents and cleanup workers, to low‐dose ionizing radiation. Here, using national cancer data and data on radionuclide fallout, the authors investigated associations between breast cancer incidence and ionizing radiation exposure in female populations in the most contaminated regions of Belarus and Ukraine following the Chernobyl accident. Analyses indicate that over the period 1986‐2016, breast cancer incidence did not increase in relation to the average 5‐year lagged cumulative breast dose in urban and rural populations. Possible dose misclassification warrants additional investigation via a case‐control study applying individual breast doses.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0020-7136</identifier><identifier>ISSN: 1097-0215</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1097-0215</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1002/ijc.33346</identifier><identifier>PMID: 33064313</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Hoboken, USA: John Wiley & Sons, Inc</publisher><subject>Adult ; Aged ; Breast cancer ; Breast Neoplasms - diagnosis ; Breast Neoplasms - epidemiology ; Breast Neoplasms - etiology ; Cancer ; Chernobyl ; Chernobyl Nuclear Accident ; Chornobyl ; Fallout ; Female ; Geography ; Humans ; Incidence ; Ionizing radiation ; Mastectomy ; Medical research ; Middle Aged ; Models, Statistical ; Neoplasms, Radiation-Induced - diagnosis ; Neoplasms, Radiation-Induced - epidemiology ; nuclear accident ; Radiation Dosage ; Radiation Exposure - adverse effects ; Radiation Exposure - analysis ; radiocesium ; Registries - statistics & numerical data ; Regression analysis ; Republic of Belarus - epidemiology ; Rural populations ; Ukraine - epidemiology</subject><ispartof>International journal of cancer, 2021-04, Vol.148 (8), p.1839-1849</ispartof><rights>2021 Union for International Cancer Control</rights><rights>2021 Union for International Cancer Control.</rights><rights>2021 UICC</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4436-10f6a54d2f5c18ae209afa294c395a84d3ad0de9831bc1c7b36881fdf201964a3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4436-10f6a54d2f5c18ae209afa294c395a84d3ad0de9831bc1c7b36881fdf201964a3</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-2144-4247</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1002%2Fijc.33346$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1002%2Fijc.33346$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,778,782,883,1414,27911,27912,45561,45562</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33064313$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Zupunski, Ljubica</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yaumenenka, Alesia</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ryzhov, Anton</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Veyalkin, Ilya</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Drozdovitch, Vladimir</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Masiuk, Sergii</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ivanova, Olha</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kesminiene, Ausrele</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pukkala, Eero</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Moiseev, Pavel</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Prysyazhnyuk, Anatoly</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Schüz, Joachim</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ostroumova, Evgenia</creatorcontrib><title>Breast cancer incidence in the regions of Belarus and Ukraine most contaminated by the Chernobyl accident: 1978 to 2016</title><title>International journal of cancer</title><addtitle>Int J Cancer</addtitle><description>Even 30 years after the accident, an association between breast cancer incidence and ionizing radiation exposure from Chernobyl fallout remains uncertain. We studied breast cancer incidence in the most contaminated regions of Belarus (Gomel and Mogilev) and Ukraine (Kyiv, Zhytomyr and Chernihiv) before (1978‐1986) and after (1987‐2016) the accident. Breast cancer cases and female population size data were received from the national cancer registries and the state departments of statistics. The study included 85 132 breast cancers with 150 million person‐years at risk. We estimated annual rayon (district)‐average absorbed doses to the breast from external and internal irradiation of the adult female population over the period of 1986‐2016. We studied an association between rayon‐average cumulative absorbed breast dose with 5‐year lag, that is, excluding the exposure in 5 years prior to breast cancer diagnosis, and breast cancer incidence using negative binomial regression models. Mean (median) cumulative breast dose in 2016 was 12.3 (5.0) milligray (mGy) in Belarus and 5.7 (2.3) mGy in Ukraine, with the maximum dose of 55 mGy and 54 mGy, respectively. Breast cancer incidence rates statistically significantly increased with calendar year and attained age, and were higher in urban than in rural residents. Adjusting for time, age and urbanicity effects, we found no evidence of increasing incidence with rayon‐average 5‐year lagged cumulative breast dose. Owing to ecological study design limitations, a case‐control study covering this area with individually reconstructed absorbed breast doses is needed testing for association between low‐dose protracted radiation exposure and breast cancer risk after Chernobyl.
What's new?
The Chernobyl nuclear accident in 1986 exposed various populations, including nearby residents and cleanup workers, to low‐dose ionizing radiation. Here, using national cancer data and data on radionuclide fallout, the authors investigated associations between breast cancer incidence and ionizing radiation exposure in female populations in the most contaminated regions of Belarus and Ukraine following the Chernobyl accident. Analyses indicate that over the period 1986‐2016, breast cancer incidence did not increase in relation to the average 5‐year lagged cumulative breast dose in urban and rural populations. Possible dose misclassification warrants additional investigation via a case‐control study applying individual breast doses.</description><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Aged</subject><subject>Breast cancer</subject><subject>Breast Neoplasms - diagnosis</subject><subject>Breast Neoplasms - epidemiology</subject><subject>Breast Neoplasms - etiology</subject><subject>Cancer</subject><subject>Chernobyl</subject><subject>Chernobyl Nuclear Accident</subject><subject>Chornobyl</subject><subject>Fallout</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Geography</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Incidence</subject><subject>Ionizing radiation</subject><subject>Mastectomy</subject><subject>Medical research</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Models, Statistical</subject><subject>Neoplasms, Radiation-Induced - diagnosis</subject><subject>Neoplasms, Radiation-Induced - epidemiology</subject><subject>nuclear accident</subject><subject>Radiation Dosage</subject><subject>Radiation Exposure - adverse effects</subject><subject>Radiation Exposure - analysis</subject><subject>radiocesium</subject><subject>Registries - statistics & numerical data</subject><subject>Regression analysis</subject><subject>Republic of Belarus - epidemiology</subject><subject>Rural populations</subject><subject>Ukraine - epidemiology</subject><issn>0020-7136</issn><issn>1097-0215</issn><issn>1097-0215</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2021</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNp1kcFu1DAQhi1ERbeFAy-ALHGhh7Se2HEcDpXoCmhRJS70bE0cp-slsYudUO3b490tFVTqySPNN5_H_gl5C-wUGCvP3Nqccs6FfEEWwJq6YCVUL8ki91hRA5eH5CilNWMAFROvyCHnTAoOfEHuL6LFNFGD3thInTeus7nMFZ1WlkZ764JPNPT0wg4Y50TRd_TmZ0TnLR3Ddjb4CUfncbIdbTe7ueXKRh_azUDR7JTTRwpNregUaMlAviYHPQ7Jvnk4j8nNl88_lpfF9fevV8tP14URgssCWC-xEl3ZVwYU2pI12GPZCMObCpXoOHass43i0BowdculUtB3fb6jkQL5MTnfe-_mdrSdyYtEHPRddCPGjQ7o9P8d71b6NvzWjShl_sUs-PAgiOHXbNOkR5eMHQb0NsxJl6ICVSnFt-j7J-g6zNHn52WqgVqCYlvqZE-ZGFKKtn9cBpjexqlznHoXZ2bf_bv9I_k3vwyc7YF7N9jN8yZ99W25V_4BF9-ouQ</recordid><startdate>20210415</startdate><enddate>20210415</enddate><creator>Zupunski, Ljubica</creator><creator>Yaumenenka, Alesia</creator><creator>Ryzhov, Anton</creator><creator>Veyalkin, Ilya</creator><creator>Drozdovitch, Vladimir</creator><creator>Masiuk, Sergii</creator><creator>Ivanova, Olha</creator><creator>Kesminiene, Ausrele</creator><creator>Pukkala, Eero</creator><creator>Moiseev, Pavel</creator><creator>Prysyazhnyuk, Anatoly</creator><creator>Schüz, Joachim</creator><creator>Ostroumova, Evgenia</creator><general>John Wiley & Sons, Inc</general><general>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7T5</scope><scope>7TO</scope><scope>7U9</scope><scope>H94</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2144-4247</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20210415</creationdate><title>Breast cancer incidence in the regions of Belarus and Ukraine most contaminated by the Chernobyl accident: 1978 to 2016</title><author>Zupunski, Ljubica ; Yaumenenka, Alesia ; Ryzhov, Anton ; Veyalkin, Ilya ; Drozdovitch, Vladimir ; Masiuk, Sergii ; Ivanova, Olha ; Kesminiene, Ausrele ; Pukkala, Eero ; Moiseev, Pavel ; Prysyazhnyuk, Anatoly ; Schüz, Joachim ; Ostroumova, Evgenia</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4436-10f6a54d2f5c18ae209afa294c395a84d3ad0de9831bc1c7b36881fdf201964a3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2021</creationdate><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Aged</topic><topic>Breast cancer</topic><topic>Breast Neoplasms - diagnosis</topic><topic>Breast Neoplasms - epidemiology</topic><topic>Breast Neoplasms - etiology</topic><topic>Cancer</topic><topic>Chernobyl</topic><topic>Chernobyl Nuclear Accident</topic><topic>Chornobyl</topic><topic>Fallout</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Geography</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Incidence</topic><topic>Ionizing radiation</topic><topic>Mastectomy</topic><topic>Medical research</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Models, Statistical</topic><topic>Neoplasms, Radiation-Induced - diagnosis</topic><topic>Neoplasms, Radiation-Induced - epidemiology</topic><topic>nuclear accident</topic><topic>Radiation Dosage</topic><topic>Radiation Exposure - adverse effects</topic><topic>Radiation Exposure - analysis</topic><topic>radiocesium</topic><topic>Registries - statistics & numerical data</topic><topic>Regression analysis</topic><topic>Republic of Belarus - epidemiology</topic><topic>Rural populations</topic><topic>Ukraine - epidemiology</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Zupunski, Ljubica</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yaumenenka, Alesia</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ryzhov, Anton</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Veyalkin, Ilya</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Drozdovitch, Vladimir</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Masiuk, Sergii</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ivanova, Olha</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kesminiene, Ausrele</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pukkala, Eero</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Moiseev, Pavel</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Prysyazhnyuk, Anatoly</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Schüz, Joachim</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ostroumova, Evgenia</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Immunology Abstracts</collection><collection>Oncogenes and Growth Factors Abstracts</collection><collection>Virology and AIDS Abstracts</collection><collection>AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>International journal of cancer</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Zupunski, Ljubica</au><au>Yaumenenka, Alesia</au><au>Ryzhov, Anton</au><au>Veyalkin, Ilya</au><au>Drozdovitch, Vladimir</au><au>Masiuk, Sergii</au><au>Ivanova, Olha</au><au>Kesminiene, Ausrele</au><au>Pukkala, Eero</au><au>Moiseev, Pavel</au><au>Prysyazhnyuk, Anatoly</au><au>Schüz, Joachim</au><au>Ostroumova, Evgenia</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Breast cancer incidence in the regions of Belarus and Ukraine most contaminated by the Chernobyl accident: 1978 to 2016</atitle><jtitle>International journal of cancer</jtitle><addtitle>Int J Cancer</addtitle><date>2021-04-15</date><risdate>2021</risdate><volume>148</volume><issue>8</issue><spage>1839</spage><epage>1849</epage><pages>1839-1849</pages><issn>0020-7136</issn><issn>1097-0215</issn><eissn>1097-0215</eissn><abstract>Even 30 years after the accident, an association between breast cancer incidence and ionizing radiation exposure from Chernobyl fallout remains uncertain. We studied breast cancer incidence in the most contaminated regions of Belarus (Gomel and Mogilev) and Ukraine (Kyiv, Zhytomyr and Chernihiv) before (1978‐1986) and after (1987‐2016) the accident. Breast cancer cases and female population size data were received from the national cancer registries and the state departments of statistics. The study included 85 132 breast cancers with 150 million person‐years at risk. We estimated annual rayon (district)‐average absorbed doses to the breast from external and internal irradiation of the adult female population over the period of 1986‐2016. We studied an association between rayon‐average cumulative absorbed breast dose with 5‐year lag, that is, excluding the exposure in 5 years prior to breast cancer diagnosis, and breast cancer incidence using negative binomial regression models. Mean (median) cumulative breast dose in 2016 was 12.3 (5.0) milligray (mGy) in Belarus and 5.7 (2.3) mGy in Ukraine, with the maximum dose of 55 mGy and 54 mGy, respectively. Breast cancer incidence rates statistically significantly increased with calendar year and attained age, and were higher in urban than in rural residents. Adjusting for time, age and urbanicity effects, we found no evidence of increasing incidence with rayon‐average 5‐year lagged cumulative breast dose. Owing to ecological study design limitations, a case‐control study covering this area with individually reconstructed absorbed breast doses is needed testing for association between low‐dose protracted radiation exposure and breast cancer risk after Chernobyl.
What's new?
The Chernobyl nuclear accident in 1986 exposed various populations, including nearby residents and cleanup workers, to low‐dose ionizing radiation. Here, using national cancer data and data on radionuclide fallout, the authors investigated associations between breast cancer incidence and ionizing radiation exposure in female populations in the most contaminated regions of Belarus and Ukraine following the Chernobyl accident. Analyses indicate that over the period 1986‐2016, breast cancer incidence did not increase in relation to the average 5‐year lagged cumulative breast dose in urban and rural populations. Possible dose misclassification warrants additional investigation via a case‐control study applying individual breast doses.</abstract><cop>Hoboken, USA</cop><pub>John Wiley & Sons, Inc</pub><pmid>33064313</pmid><doi>10.1002/ijc.33346</doi><tpages>11</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2144-4247</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0020-7136 |
ispartof | International journal of cancer, 2021-04, Vol.148 (8), p.1839-1849 |
issn | 0020-7136 1097-0215 1097-0215 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_9426215 |
source | MEDLINE; Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete; Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals |
subjects | Adult Aged Breast cancer Breast Neoplasms - diagnosis Breast Neoplasms - epidemiology Breast Neoplasms - etiology Cancer Chernobyl Chernobyl Nuclear Accident Chornobyl Fallout Female Geography Humans Incidence Ionizing radiation Mastectomy Medical research Middle Aged Models, Statistical Neoplasms, Radiation-Induced - diagnosis Neoplasms, Radiation-Induced - epidemiology nuclear accident Radiation Dosage Radiation Exposure - adverse effects Radiation Exposure - analysis radiocesium Registries - statistics & numerical data Regression analysis Republic of Belarus - epidemiology Rural populations Ukraine - epidemiology |
title | Breast cancer incidence in the regions of Belarus and Ukraine most contaminated by the Chernobyl accident: 1978 to 2016 |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-16T05%3A03%3A48IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Breast%20cancer%20incidence%20in%20the%20regions%20of%20Belarus%20and%20Ukraine%20most%20contaminated%20by%20the%20Chernobyl%20accident:%201978%20to%202016&rft.jtitle=International%20journal%20of%20cancer&rft.au=Zupunski,%20Ljubica&rft.date=2021-04-15&rft.volume=148&rft.issue=8&rft.spage=1839&rft.epage=1849&rft.pages=1839-1849&rft.issn=0020-7136&rft.eissn=1097-0215&rft_id=info:doi/10.1002/ijc.33346&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E2491761805%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2491761805&rft_id=info:pmid/33064313&rfr_iscdi=true |