Breast cancer incidence in the regions of Belarus and Ukraine most contaminated by the Chernobyl accident: 1978 to 2016

Even 30 years after the accident, an association between breast cancer incidence and ionizing radiation exposure from Chernobyl fallout remains uncertain. We studied breast cancer incidence in the most contaminated regions of Belarus (Gomel and Mogilev) and Ukraine (Kyiv, Zhytomyr and Chernihiv) bef...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:International journal of cancer 2021-04, Vol.148 (8), p.1839-1849
Hauptverfasser: Zupunski, Ljubica, Yaumenenka, Alesia, Ryzhov, Anton, Veyalkin, Ilya, Drozdovitch, Vladimir, Masiuk, Sergii, Ivanova, Olha, Kesminiene, Ausrele, Pukkala, Eero, Moiseev, Pavel, Prysyazhnyuk, Anatoly, Schüz, Joachim, Ostroumova, Evgenia
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 1849
container_issue 8
container_start_page 1839
container_title International journal of cancer
container_volume 148
creator Zupunski, Ljubica
Yaumenenka, Alesia
Ryzhov, Anton
Veyalkin, Ilya
Drozdovitch, Vladimir
Masiuk, Sergii
Ivanova, Olha
Kesminiene, Ausrele
Pukkala, Eero
Moiseev, Pavel
Prysyazhnyuk, Anatoly
Schüz, Joachim
Ostroumova, Evgenia
description Even 30 years after the accident, an association between breast cancer incidence and ionizing radiation exposure from Chernobyl fallout remains uncertain. We studied breast cancer incidence in the most contaminated regions of Belarus (Gomel and Mogilev) and Ukraine (Kyiv, Zhytomyr and Chernihiv) before (1978‐1986) and after (1987‐2016) the accident. Breast cancer cases and female population size data were received from the national cancer registries and the state departments of statistics. The study included 85 132 breast cancers with 150 million person‐years at risk. We estimated annual rayon (district)‐average absorbed doses to the breast from external and internal irradiation of the adult female population over the period of 1986‐2016. We studied an association between rayon‐average cumulative absorbed breast dose with 5‐year lag, that is, excluding the exposure in 5 years prior to breast cancer diagnosis, and breast cancer incidence using negative binomial regression models. Mean (median) cumulative breast dose in 2016 was 12.3 (5.0) milligray (mGy) in Belarus and 5.7 (2.3) mGy in Ukraine, with the maximum dose of 55 mGy and 54 mGy, respectively. Breast cancer incidence rates statistically significantly increased with calendar year and attained age, and were higher in urban than in rural residents. Adjusting for time, age and urbanicity effects, we found no evidence of increasing incidence with rayon‐average 5‐year lagged cumulative breast dose. Owing to ecological study design limitations, a case‐control study covering this area with individually reconstructed absorbed breast doses is needed testing for association between low‐dose protracted radiation exposure and breast cancer risk after Chernobyl. What's new? The Chernobyl nuclear accident in 1986 exposed various populations, including nearby residents and cleanup workers, to low‐dose ionizing radiation. Here, using national cancer data and data on radionuclide fallout, the authors investigated associations between breast cancer incidence and ionizing radiation exposure in female populations in the most contaminated regions of Belarus and Ukraine following the Chernobyl accident. Analyses indicate that over the period 1986‐2016, breast cancer incidence did not increase in relation to the average 5‐year lagged cumulative breast dose in urban and rural populations. Possible dose misclassification warrants additional investigation via a case‐control study applying individual breast doses.
doi_str_mv 10.1002/ijc.33346
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_9426215</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2491761805</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4436-10f6a54d2f5c18ae209afa294c395a84d3ad0de9831bc1c7b36881fdf201964a3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kcFu1DAQhi1ERbeFAy-ALHGhh7Se2HEcDpXoCmhRJS70bE0cp-slsYudUO3b490tFVTqySPNN5_H_gl5C-wUGCvP3Nqccs6FfEEWwJq6YCVUL8ki91hRA5eH5CilNWMAFROvyCHnTAoOfEHuL6LFNFGD3thInTeus7nMFZ1WlkZ764JPNPT0wg4Y50TRd_TmZ0TnLR3Ddjb4CUfncbIdbTe7ueXKRh_azUDR7JTTRwpNregUaMlAviYHPQ7Jvnk4j8nNl88_lpfF9fevV8tP14URgssCWC-xEl3ZVwYU2pI12GPZCMObCpXoOHass43i0BowdculUtB3fb6jkQL5MTnfe-_mdrSdyYtEHPRddCPGjQ7o9P8d71b6NvzWjShl_sUs-PAgiOHXbNOkR5eMHQb0NsxJl6ICVSnFt-j7J-g6zNHn52WqgVqCYlvqZE-ZGFKKtn9cBpjexqlznHoXZ2bf_bv9I_k3vwyc7YF7N9jN8yZ99W25V_4BF9-ouQ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2491761805</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Breast cancer incidence in the regions of Belarus and Ukraine most contaminated by the Chernobyl accident: 1978 to 2016</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete</source><source>Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals</source><creator>Zupunski, Ljubica ; Yaumenenka, Alesia ; Ryzhov, Anton ; Veyalkin, Ilya ; Drozdovitch, Vladimir ; Masiuk, Sergii ; Ivanova, Olha ; Kesminiene, Ausrele ; Pukkala, Eero ; Moiseev, Pavel ; Prysyazhnyuk, Anatoly ; Schüz, Joachim ; Ostroumova, Evgenia</creator><creatorcontrib>Zupunski, Ljubica ; Yaumenenka, Alesia ; Ryzhov, Anton ; Veyalkin, Ilya ; Drozdovitch, Vladimir ; Masiuk, Sergii ; Ivanova, Olha ; Kesminiene, Ausrele ; Pukkala, Eero ; Moiseev, Pavel ; Prysyazhnyuk, Anatoly ; Schüz, Joachim ; Ostroumova, Evgenia</creatorcontrib><description>Even 30 years after the accident, an association between breast cancer incidence and ionizing radiation exposure from Chernobyl fallout remains uncertain. We studied breast cancer incidence in the most contaminated regions of Belarus (Gomel and Mogilev) and Ukraine (Kyiv, Zhytomyr and Chernihiv) before (1978‐1986) and after (1987‐2016) the accident. Breast cancer cases and female population size data were received from the national cancer registries and the state departments of statistics. The study included 85 132 breast cancers with 150 million person‐years at risk. We estimated annual rayon (district)‐average absorbed doses to the breast from external and internal irradiation of the adult female population over the period of 1986‐2016. We studied an association between rayon‐average cumulative absorbed breast dose with 5‐year lag, that is, excluding the exposure in 5 years prior to breast cancer diagnosis, and breast cancer incidence using negative binomial regression models. Mean (median) cumulative breast dose in 2016 was 12.3 (5.0) milligray (mGy) in Belarus and 5.7 (2.3) mGy in Ukraine, with the maximum dose of 55 mGy and 54 mGy, respectively. Breast cancer incidence rates statistically significantly increased with calendar year and attained age, and were higher in urban than in rural residents. Adjusting for time, age and urbanicity effects, we found no evidence of increasing incidence with rayon‐average 5‐year lagged cumulative breast dose. Owing to ecological study design limitations, a case‐control study covering this area with individually reconstructed absorbed breast doses is needed testing for association between low‐dose protracted radiation exposure and breast cancer risk after Chernobyl. What's new? The Chernobyl nuclear accident in 1986 exposed various populations, including nearby residents and cleanup workers, to low‐dose ionizing radiation. Here, using national cancer data and data on radionuclide fallout, the authors investigated associations between breast cancer incidence and ionizing radiation exposure in female populations in the most contaminated regions of Belarus and Ukraine following the Chernobyl accident. Analyses indicate that over the period 1986‐2016, breast cancer incidence did not increase in relation to the average 5‐year lagged cumulative breast dose in urban and rural populations. Possible dose misclassification warrants additional investigation via a case‐control study applying individual breast doses.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0020-7136</identifier><identifier>ISSN: 1097-0215</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1097-0215</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1002/ijc.33346</identifier><identifier>PMID: 33064313</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Hoboken, USA: John Wiley &amp; Sons, Inc</publisher><subject>Adult ; Aged ; Breast cancer ; Breast Neoplasms - diagnosis ; Breast Neoplasms - epidemiology ; Breast Neoplasms - etiology ; Cancer ; Chernobyl ; Chernobyl Nuclear Accident ; Chornobyl ; Fallout ; Female ; Geography ; Humans ; Incidence ; Ionizing radiation ; Mastectomy ; Medical research ; Middle Aged ; Models, Statistical ; Neoplasms, Radiation-Induced - diagnosis ; Neoplasms, Radiation-Induced - epidemiology ; nuclear accident ; Radiation Dosage ; Radiation Exposure - adverse effects ; Radiation Exposure - analysis ; radiocesium ; Registries - statistics &amp; numerical data ; Regression analysis ; Republic of Belarus - epidemiology ; Rural populations ; Ukraine - epidemiology</subject><ispartof>International journal of cancer, 2021-04, Vol.148 (8), p.1839-1849</ispartof><rights>2021 Union for International Cancer Control</rights><rights>2021 Union for International Cancer Control.</rights><rights>2021 UICC</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4436-10f6a54d2f5c18ae209afa294c395a84d3ad0de9831bc1c7b36881fdf201964a3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4436-10f6a54d2f5c18ae209afa294c395a84d3ad0de9831bc1c7b36881fdf201964a3</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-2144-4247</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1002%2Fijc.33346$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1002%2Fijc.33346$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,778,782,883,1414,27911,27912,45561,45562</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33064313$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Zupunski, Ljubica</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yaumenenka, Alesia</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ryzhov, Anton</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Veyalkin, Ilya</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Drozdovitch, Vladimir</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Masiuk, Sergii</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ivanova, Olha</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kesminiene, Ausrele</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pukkala, Eero</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Moiseev, Pavel</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Prysyazhnyuk, Anatoly</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Schüz, Joachim</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ostroumova, Evgenia</creatorcontrib><title>Breast cancer incidence in the regions of Belarus and Ukraine most contaminated by the Chernobyl accident: 1978 to 2016</title><title>International journal of cancer</title><addtitle>Int J Cancer</addtitle><description>Even 30 years after the accident, an association between breast cancer incidence and ionizing radiation exposure from Chernobyl fallout remains uncertain. We studied breast cancer incidence in the most contaminated regions of Belarus (Gomel and Mogilev) and Ukraine (Kyiv, Zhytomyr and Chernihiv) before (1978‐1986) and after (1987‐2016) the accident. Breast cancer cases and female population size data were received from the national cancer registries and the state departments of statistics. The study included 85 132 breast cancers with 150 million person‐years at risk. We estimated annual rayon (district)‐average absorbed doses to the breast from external and internal irradiation of the adult female population over the period of 1986‐2016. We studied an association between rayon‐average cumulative absorbed breast dose with 5‐year lag, that is, excluding the exposure in 5 years prior to breast cancer diagnosis, and breast cancer incidence using negative binomial regression models. Mean (median) cumulative breast dose in 2016 was 12.3 (5.0) milligray (mGy) in Belarus and 5.7 (2.3) mGy in Ukraine, with the maximum dose of 55 mGy and 54 mGy, respectively. Breast cancer incidence rates statistically significantly increased with calendar year and attained age, and were higher in urban than in rural residents. Adjusting for time, age and urbanicity effects, we found no evidence of increasing incidence with rayon‐average 5‐year lagged cumulative breast dose. Owing to ecological study design limitations, a case‐control study covering this area with individually reconstructed absorbed breast doses is needed testing for association between low‐dose protracted radiation exposure and breast cancer risk after Chernobyl. What's new? The Chernobyl nuclear accident in 1986 exposed various populations, including nearby residents and cleanup workers, to low‐dose ionizing radiation. Here, using national cancer data and data on radionuclide fallout, the authors investigated associations between breast cancer incidence and ionizing radiation exposure in female populations in the most contaminated regions of Belarus and Ukraine following the Chernobyl accident. Analyses indicate that over the period 1986‐2016, breast cancer incidence did not increase in relation to the average 5‐year lagged cumulative breast dose in urban and rural populations. Possible dose misclassification warrants additional investigation via a case‐control study applying individual breast doses.</description><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Aged</subject><subject>Breast cancer</subject><subject>Breast Neoplasms - diagnosis</subject><subject>Breast Neoplasms - epidemiology</subject><subject>Breast Neoplasms - etiology</subject><subject>Cancer</subject><subject>Chernobyl</subject><subject>Chernobyl Nuclear Accident</subject><subject>Chornobyl</subject><subject>Fallout</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Geography</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Incidence</subject><subject>Ionizing radiation</subject><subject>Mastectomy</subject><subject>Medical research</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Models, Statistical</subject><subject>Neoplasms, Radiation-Induced - diagnosis</subject><subject>Neoplasms, Radiation-Induced - epidemiology</subject><subject>nuclear accident</subject><subject>Radiation Dosage</subject><subject>Radiation Exposure - adverse effects</subject><subject>Radiation Exposure - analysis</subject><subject>radiocesium</subject><subject>Registries - statistics &amp; numerical data</subject><subject>Regression analysis</subject><subject>Republic of Belarus - epidemiology</subject><subject>Rural populations</subject><subject>Ukraine - epidemiology</subject><issn>0020-7136</issn><issn>1097-0215</issn><issn>1097-0215</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2021</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNp1kcFu1DAQhi1ERbeFAy-ALHGhh7Se2HEcDpXoCmhRJS70bE0cp-slsYudUO3b490tFVTqySPNN5_H_gl5C-wUGCvP3Nqccs6FfEEWwJq6YCVUL8ki91hRA5eH5CilNWMAFROvyCHnTAoOfEHuL6LFNFGD3thInTeus7nMFZ1WlkZ764JPNPT0wg4Y50TRd_TmZ0TnLR3Ddjb4CUfncbIdbTe7ueXKRh_azUDR7JTTRwpNregUaMlAviYHPQ7Jvnk4j8nNl88_lpfF9fevV8tP14URgssCWC-xEl3ZVwYU2pI12GPZCMObCpXoOHass43i0BowdculUtB3fb6jkQL5MTnfe-_mdrSdyYtEHPRddCPGjQ7o9P8d71b6NvzWjShl_sUs-PAgiOHXbNOkR5eMHQb0NsxJl6ICVSnFt-j7J-g6zNHn52WqgVqCYlvqZE-ZGFKKtn9cBpjexqlznHoXZ2bf_bv9I_k3vwyc7YF7N9jN8yZ99W25V_4BF9-ouQ</recordid><startdate>20210415</startdate><enddate>20210415</enddate><creator>Zupunski, Ljubica</creator><creator>Yaumenenka, Alesia</creator><creator>Ryzhov, Anton</creator><creator>Veyalkin, Ilya</creator><creator>Drozdovitch, Vladimir</creator><creator>Masiuk, Sergii</creator><creator>Ivanova, Olha</creator><creator>Kesminiene, Ausrele</creator><creator>Pukkala, Eero</creator><creator>Moiseev, Pavel</creator><creator>Prysyazhnyuk, Anatoly</creator><creator>Schüz, Joachim</creator><creator>Ostroumova, Evgenia</creator><general>John Wiley &amp; Sons, Inc</general><general>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7T5</scope><scope>7TO</scope><scope>7U9</scope><scope>H94</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2144-4247</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20210415</creationdate><title>Breast cancer incidence in the regions of Belarus and Ukraine most contaminated by the Chernobyl accident: 1978 to 2016</title><author>Zupunski, Ljubica ; Yaumenenka, Alesia ; Ryzhov, Anton ; Veyalkin, Ilya ; Drozdovitch, Vladimir ; Masiuk, Sergii ; Ivanova, Olha ; Kesminiene, Ausrele ; Pukkala, Eero ; Moiseev, Pavel ; Prysyazhnyuk, Anatoly ; Schüz, Joachim ; Ostroumova, Evgenia</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4436-10f6a54d2f5c18ae209afa294c395a84d3ad0de9831bc1c7b36881fdf201964a3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2021</creationdate><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Aged</topic><topic>Breast cancer</topic><topic>Breast Neoplasms - diagnosis</topic><topic>Breast Neoplasms - epidemiology</topic><topic>Breast Neoplasms - etiology</topic><topic>Cancer</topic><topic>Chernobyl</topic><topic>Chernobyl Nuclear Accident</topic><topic>Chornobyl</topic><topic>Fallout</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Geography</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Incidence</topic><topic>Ionizing radiation</topic><topic>Mastectomy</topic><topic>Medical research</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Models, Statistical</topic><topic>Neoplasms, Radiation-Induced - diagnosis</topic><topic>Neoplasms, Radiation-Induced - epidemiology</topic><topic>nuclear accident</topic><topic>Radiation Dosage</topic><topic>Radiation Exposure - adverse effects</topic><topic>Radiation Exposure - analysis</topic><topic>radiocesium</topic><topic>Registries - statistics &amp; numerical data</topic><topic>Regression analysis</topic><topic>Republic of Belarus - epidemiology</topic><topic>Rural populations</topic><topic>Ukraine - epidemiology</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Zupunski, Ljubica</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yaumenenka, Alesia</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ryzhov, Anton</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Veyalkin, Ilya</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Drozdovitch, Vladimir</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Masiuk, Sergii</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ivanova, Olha</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kesminiene, Ausrele</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pukkala, Eero</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Moiseev, Pavel</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Prysyazhnyuk, Anatoly</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Schüz, Joachim</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ostroumova, Evgenia</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Immunology Abstracts</collection><collection>Oncogenes and Growth Factors Abstracts</collection><collection>Virology and AIDS Abstracts</collection><collection>AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>International journal of cancer</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Zupunski, Ljubica</au><au>Yaumenenka, Alesia</au><au>Ryzhov, Anton</au><au>Veyalkin, Ilya</au><au>Drozdovitch, Vladimir</au><au>Masiuk, Sergii</au><au>Ivanova, Olha</au><au>Kesminiene, Ausrele</au><au>Pukkala, Eero</au><au>Moiseev, Pavel</au><au>Prysyazhnyuk, Anatoly</au><au>Schüz, Joachim</au><au>Ostroumova, Evgenia</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Breast cancer incidence in the regions of Belarus and Ukraine most contaminated by the Chernobyl accident: 1978 to 2016</atitle><jtitle>International journal of cancer</jtitle><addtitle>Int J Cancer</addtitle><date>2021-04-15</date><risdate>2021</risdate><volume>148</volume><issue>8</issue><spage>1839</spage><epage>1849</epage><pages>1839-1849</pages><issn>0020-7136</issn><issn>1097-0215</issn><eissn>1097-0215</eissn><abstract>Even 30 years after the accident, an association between breast cancer incidence and ionizing radiation exposure from Chernobyl fallout remains uncertain. We studied breast cancer incidence in the most contaminated regions of Belarus (Gomel and Mogilev) and Ukraine (Kyiv, Zhytomyr and Chernihiv) before (1978‐1986) and after (1987‐2016) the accident. Breast cancer cases and female population size data were received from the national cancer registries and the state departments of statistics. The study included 85 132 breast cancers with 150 million person‐years at risk. We estimated annual rayon (district)‐average absorbed doses to the breast from external and internal irradiation of the adult female population over the period of 1986‐2016. We studied an association between rayon‐average cumulative absorbed breast dose with 5‐year lag, that is, excluding the exposure in 5 years prior to breast cancer diagnosis, and breast cancer incidence using negative binomial regression models. Mean (median) cumulative breast dose in 2016 was 12.3 (5.0) milligray (mGy) in Belarus and 5.7 (2.3) mGy in Ukraine, with the maximum dose of 55 mGy and 54 mGy, respectively. Breast cancer incidence rates statistically significantly increased with calendar year and attained age, and were higher in urban than in rural residents. Adjusting for time, age and urbanicity effects, we found no evidence of increasing incidence with rayon‐average 5‐year lagged cumulative breast dose. Owing to ecological study design limitations, a case‐control study covering this area with individually reconstructed absorbed breast doses is needed testing for association between low‐dose protracted radiation exposure and breast cancer risk after Chernobyl. What's new? The Chernobyl nuclear accident in 1986 exposed various populations, including nearby residents and cleanup workers, to low‐dose ionizing radiation. Here, using national cancer data and data on radionuclide fallout, the authors investigated associations between breast cancer incidence and ionizing radiation exposure in female populations in the most contaminated regions of Belarus and Ukraine following the Chernobyl accident. Analyses indicate that over the period 1986‐2016, breast cancer incidence did not increase in relation to the average 5‐year lagged cumulative breast dose in urban and rural populations. Possible dose misclassification warrants additional investigation via a case‐control study applying individual breast doses.</abstract><cop>Hoboken, USA</cop><pub>John Wiley &amp; Sons, Inc</pub><pmid>33064313</pmid><doi>10.1002/ijc.33346</doi><tpages>11</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2144-4247</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0020-7136
ispartof International journal of cancer, 2021-04, Vol.148 (8), p.1839-1849
issn 0020-7136
1097-0215
1097-0215
language eng
recordid cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_9426215
source MEDLINE; Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete; Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals
subjects Adult
Aged
Breast cancer
Breast Neoplasms - diagnosis
Breast Neoplasms - epidemiology
Breast Neoplasms - etiology
Cancer
Chernobyl
Chernobyl Nuclear Accident
Chornobyl
Fallout
Female
Geography
Humans
Incidence
Ionizing radiation
Mastectomy
Medical research
Middle Aged
Models, Statistical
Neoplasms, Radiation-Induced - diagnosis
Neoplasms, Radiation-Induced - epidemiology
nuclear accident
Radiation Dosage
Radiation Exposure - adverse effects
Radiation Exposure - analysis
radiocesium
Registries - statistics & numerical data
Regression analysis
Republic of Belarus - epidemiology
Rural populations
Ukraine - epidemiology
title Breast cancer incidence in the regions of Belarus and Ukraine most contaminated by the Chernobyl accident: 1978 to 2016
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-16T05%3A03%3A48IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Breast%20cancer%20incidence%20in%20the%20regions%20of%20Belarus%20and%20Ukraine%20most%20contaminated%20by%20the%20Chernobyl%20accident:%201978%20to%202016&rft.jtitle=International%20journal%20of%20cancer&rft.au=Zupunski,%20Ljubica&rft.date=2021-04-15&rft.volume=148&rft.issue=8&rft.spage=1839&rft.epage=1849&rft.pages=1839-1849&rft.issn=0020-7136&rft.eissn=1097-0215&rft_id=info:doi/10.1002/ijc.33346&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E2491761805%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2491761805&rft_id=info:pmid/33064313&rfr_iscdi=true