Three-year Efficacy and Safety of Takeda’s Dengue Vaccine Candidate (TAK-003)
Abstract Background Takeda’s live attenuated tetravalent dengue vaccine candidate (TAK-003) is under evaluation in a long-term clinical trial across 8 dengue-endemic countries. Previously, we have reported its efficacy and safety in both seronegative and seropositive participants and that its perfor...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Clinical infectious diseases 2022-08, Vol.75 (1), p.107-117 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 117 |
---|---|
container_issue | 1 |
container_start_page | 107 |
container_title | Clinical infectious diseases |
container_volume | 75 |
creator | Rivera, Luis Biswal, Shibadas Sáez-Llorens, Xavier Reynales, Humberto López-Medina, Eduardo Borja-Tabora, Charissa Bravo, Lulu Sirivichayakul, Chukiat Kosalaraksa, Pope Martinez Vargas, Luis Yu, Delia Watanaveeradej, Veerachai Espinoza, Felix Dietze, Reynaldo Fernando, LakKumar Wickramasinghe, Pujitha Duarte MoreiraJr, Edson Fernando, Asvini D Gunasekera, Dulanie Luz, Kleber Venâncioda Cunha, Rivaldo Rauscher, Martina Zent, Olaf Liu, Mengya Hoffman, Elaine LeFevre, Inge Tricou, Vianney Wallace, Derek Alera, MariaTheresa Borkowski, Astrid |
description | Abstract
Background
Takeda’s live attenuated tetravalent dengue vaccine candidate (TAK-003) is under evaluation in a long-term clinical trial across 8 dengue-endemic countries. Previously, we have reported its efficacy and safety in both seronegative and seropositive participants and that its performance varies by serotype, with some decline in efficacy from first to second year postvaccination. This exploratory analysis provides an update with cumulative and third-year data.
Methods
Healthy 4–16 year olds (n = 20099) were randomized 2:1 to receive TAK-003 or placebo (0, 3 month schedule). The protocol included baseline serostatus testing of all participants and detection of all symptomatic dengue throughout the trial with a serotype specific reverse transcriptase-polymerase chain reaction.
Results
Cumulative efficacy after 3 years was 62.0% (95% confidence interval, 56.6–66.7) against virologically confirmed dengue (VCD) and 83.6% (76.8–88.4) against hospitalized VCD. Efficacy was 54.3% (41.9–64.1) against VCD and 77.1% (58.6–87.3) against hospitalized VCD in baseline seronegatives, and 65.0% (58.9–70.1) against VCD and 86.0% (78.4–91.0) against hospitalized VCD in baseline seropositives. Efficacy against VCD during the third year declined to 44.7% (32.5–54.7), whereas efficacy against hospitalized VCD was sustained at 70.8% (49.6–83.0). Rates of serious adverse events were 2.9% in TAK-003 group and 3.5% in placebo group during the ongoing long-term follow-up (ie, second half of the 3 years following vaccination), but none were related. No important safety risks were identified.
Conclusions
TAK-003 was efficacious against symptomatic dengue over 3 years. Efficacy declined over time but remained robust against hospitalized dengue. A booster dose evaluation is planned.
This ongoing phase 3 study demonstrated that TAK-003 was efficacious against symptomatic dengue in children and adolescents in a varied epidemiological setting across 8 dengue-endemic countries over 3 years postvaccination, and supports the utility of TAK-003 in dengue control. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1093/cid/ciab864 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_9402653</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><oup_id>10.1093/cid/ciab864</oup_id><sourcerecordid>2579377104</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c389t-db076ded3877749bd34e2772c8e290fdd62d2e28ddb14ee0192b04b5568c51263</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp90ctKw0AUBuBBFFsvK19gVlKR6Fwzk41Qar1goQur22Eyc9JG26RmEiE7X8PX80mMtAhuXAxn4Hz8Z_EjdELJBSUJv3S5755NdSx2UJ9KrqJYJnS3-xOpI6G57qGDEF4IoVQTuY96XMSkM7KPprNFBRC1YCs8zrLcWddiW3j8aDOoW1xmeGZfwduvj8-Ar6GYN4CfrXN5AXjUwdzbGvBgNnyICOFnR2gvs8sAx9t5iJ5uxrPRXTSZ3t6PhpPIcZ3UkU-Jij14rpVSIkk9F8CUYk4DS0jmfcw8A6a9T6kAIDRhKRGplLF2krKYH6KrTe66SVfgHRR1ZZdmXeUrW7WmtLn5uynyhZmX7yYRhMWSdwGDbUBVvjUQarPKg4Pl0hZQNsEwqRKuFCWio-cb6qoyhAqy3zOUmJ8KTFeB2VbQ6dONLpv1v_AbRdmFow</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2579377104</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Three-year Efficacy and Safety of Takeda’s Dengue Vaccine Candidate (TAK-003)</title><source>Oxford University Press Journals All Titles (1996-Current)</source><source>EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals</source><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><creator>Rivera, Luis ; Biswal, Shibadas ; Sáez-Llorens, Xavier ; Reynales, Humberto ; López-Medina, Eduardo ; Borja-Tabora, Charissa ; Bravo, Lulu ; Sirivichayakul, Chukiat ; Kosalaraksa, Pope ; Martinez Vargas, Luis ; Yu, Delia ; Watanaveeradej, Veerachai ; Espinoza, Felix ; Dietze, Reynaldo ; Fernando, LakKumar ; Wickramasinghe, Pujitha ; Duarte MoreiraJr, Edson ; Fernando, Asvini D ; Gunasekera, Dulanie ; Luz, Kleber ; Venâncioda Cunha, Rivaldo ; Rauscher, Martina ; Zent, Olaf ; Liu, Mengya ; Hoffman, Elaine ; LeFevre, Inge ; Tricou, Vianney ; Wallace, Derek ; Alera, MariaTheresa ; Borkowski, Astrid</creator><creatorcontrib>Rivera, Luis ; Biswal, Shibadas ; Sáez-Llorens, Xavier ; Reynales, Humberto ; López-Medina, Eduardo ; Borja-Tabora, Charissa ; Bravo, Lulu ; Sirivichayakul, Chukiat ; Kosalaraksa, Pope ; Martinez Vargas, Luis ; Yu, Delia ; Watanaveeradej, Veerachai ; Espinoza, Felix ; Dietze, Reynaldo ; Fernando, LakKumar ; Wickramasinghe, Pujitha ; Duarte MoreiraJr, Edson ; Fernando, Asvini D ; Gunasekera, Dulanie ; Luz, Kleber ; Venâncioda Cunha, Rivaldo ; Rauscher, Martina ; Zent, Olaf ; Liu, Mengya ; Hoffman, Elaine ; LeFevre, Inge ; Tricou, Vianney ; Wallace, Derek ; Alera, MariaTheresa ; Borkowski, Astrid</creatorcontrib><description>Abstract
Background
Takeda’s live attenuated tetravalent dengue vaccine candidate (TAK-003) is under evaluation in a long-term clinical trial across 8 dengue-endemic countries. Previously, we have reported its efficacy and safety in both seronegative and seropositive participants and that its performance varies by serotype, with some decline in efficacy from first to second year postvaccination. This exploratory analysis provides an update with cumulative and third-year data.
Methods
Healthy 4–16 year olds (n = 20099) were randomized 2:1 to receive TAK-003 or placebo (0, 3 month schedule). The protocol included baseline serostatus testing of all participants and detection of all symptomatic dengue throughout the trial with a serotype specific reverse transcriptase-polymerase chain reaction.
Results
Cumulative efficacy after 3 years was 62.0% (95% confidence interval, 56.6–66.7) against virologically confirmed dengue (VCD) and 83.6% (76.8–88.4) against hospitalized VCD. Efficacy was 54.3% (41.9–64.1) against VCD and 77.1% (58.6–87.3) against hospitalized VCD in baseline seronegatives, and 65.0% (58.9–70.1) against VCD and 86.0% (78.4–91.0) against hospitalized VCD in baseline seropositives. Efficacy against VCD during the third year declined to 44.7% (32.5–54.7), whereas efficacy against hospitalized VCD was sustained at 70.8% (49.6–83.0). Rates of serious adverse events were 2.9% in TAK-003 group and 3.5% in placebo group during the ongoing long-term follow-up (ie, second half of the 3 years following vaccination), but none were related. No important safety risks were identified.
Conclusions
TAK-003 was efficacious against symptomatic dengue over 3 years. Efficacy declined over time but remained robust against hospitalized dengue. A booster dose evaluation is planned.
This ongoing phase 3 study demonstrated that TAK-003 was efficacious against symptomatic dengue in children and adolescents in a varied epidemiological setting across 8 dengue-endemic countries over 3 years postvaccination, and supports the utility of TAK-003 in dengue control.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1058-4838</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1537-6591</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1093/cid/ciab864</identifier><identifier>PMID: 34606595</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>US: Oxford University Press</publisher><subject>Major</subject><ispartof>Clinical infectious diseases, 2022-08, Vol.75 (1), p.107-117</ispartof><rights>The Author(s) 2021. Published by Oxford University Press for the Infectious Diseases Society of America. 2021</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c389t-db076ded3877749bd34e2772c8e290fdd62d2e28ddb14ee0192b04b5568c51263</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c389t-db076ded3877749bd34e2772c8e290fdd62d2e28ddb14ee0192b04b5568c51263</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>230,314,776,780,881,1578,27901,27902</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Rivera, Luis</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Biswal, Shibadas</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sáez-Llorens, Xavier</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Reynales, Humberto</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>López-Medina, Eduardo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Borja-Tabora, Charissa</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bravo, Lulu</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sirivichayakul, Chukiat</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kosalaraksa, Pope</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Martinez Vargas, Luis</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yu, Delia</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Watanaveeradej, Veerachai</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Espinoza, Felix</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dietze, Reynaldo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fernando, LakKumar</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wickramasinghe, Pujitha</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Duarte MoreiraJr, Edson</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fernando, Asvini D</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gunasekera, Dulanie</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Luz, Kleber</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Venâncioda Cunha, Rivaldo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rauscher, Martina</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zent, Olaf</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Liu, Mengya</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hoffman, Elaine</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>LeFevre, Inge</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tricou, Vianney</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wallace, Derek</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Alera, MariaTheresa</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Borkowski, Astrid</creatorcontrib><title>Three-year Efficacy and Safety of Takeda’s Dengue Vaccine Candidate (TAK-003)</title><title>Clinical infectious diseases</title><description>Abstract
Background
Takeda’s live attenuated tetravalent dengue vaccine candidate (TAK-003) is under evaluation in a long-term clinical trial across 8 dengue-endemic countries. Previously, we have reported its efficacy and safety in both seronegative and seropositive participants and that its performance varies by serotype, with some decline in efficacy from first to second year postvaccination. This exploratory analysis provides an update with cumulative and third-year data.
Methods
Healthy 4–16 year olds (n = 20099) were randomized 2:1 to receive TAK-003 or placebo (0, 3 month schedule). The protocol included baseline serostatus testing of all participants and detection of all symptomatic dengue throughout the trial with a serotype specific reverse transcriptase-polymerase chain reaction.
Results
Cumulative efficacy after 3 years was 62.0% (95% confidence interval, 56.6–66.7) against virologically confirmed dengue (VCD) and 83.6% (76.8–88.4) against hospitalized VCD. Efficacy was 54.3% (41.9–64.1) against VCD and 77.1% (58.6–87.3) against hospitalized VCD in baseline seronegatives, and 65.0% (58.9–70.1) against VCD and 86.0% (78.4–91.0) against hospitalized VCD in baseline seropositives. Efficacy against VCD during the third year declined to 44.7% (32.5–54.7), whereas efficacy against hospitalized VCD was sustained at 70.8% (49.6–83.0). Rates of serious adverse events were 2.9% in TAK-003 group and 3.5% in placebo group during the ongoing long-term follow-up (ie, second half of the 3 years following vaccination), but none were related. No important safety risks were identified.
Conclusions
TAK-003 was efficacious against symptomatic dengue over 3 years. Efficacy declined over time but remained robust against hospitalized dengue. A booster dose evaluation is planned.
This ongoing phase 3 study demonstrated that TAK-003 was efficacious against symptomatic dengue in children and adolescents in a varied epidemiological setting across 8 dengue-endemic countries over 3 years postvaccination, and supports the utility of TAK-003 in dengue control.</description><subject>Major</subject><issn>1058-4838</issn><issn>1537-6591</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2022</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>TOX</sourceid><recordid>eNp90ctKw0AUBuBBFFsvK19gVlKR6Fwzk41Qar1goQur22Eyc9JG26RmEiE7X8PX80mMtAhuXAxn4Hz8Z_EjdELJBSUJv3S5755NdSx2UJ9KrqJYJnS3-xOpI6G57qGDEF4IoVQTuY96XMSkM7KPprNFBRC1YCs8zrLcWddiW3j8aDOoW1xmeGZfwduvj8-Ar6GYN4CfrXN5AXjUwdzbGvBgNnyICOFnR2gvs8sAx9t5iJ5uxrPRXTSZ3t6PhpPIcZ3UkU-Jij14rpVSIkk9F8CUYk4DS0jmfcw8A6a9T6kAIDRhKRGplLF2krKYH6KrTe66SVfgHRR1ZZdmXeUrW7WmtLn5uynyhZmX7yYRhMWSdwGDbUBVvjUQarPKg4Pl0hZQNsEwqRKuFCWio-cb6qoyhAqy3zOUmJ8KTFeB2VbQ6dONLpv1v_AbRdmFow</recordid><startdate>20220824</startdate><enddate>20220824</enddate><creator>Rivera, Luis</creator><creator>Biswal, Shibadas</creator><creator>Sáez-Llorens, Xavier</creator><creator>Reynales, Humberto</creator><creator>López-Medina, Eduardo</creator><creator>Borja-Tabora, Charissa</creator><creator>Bravo, Lulu</creator><creator>Sirivichayakul, Chukiat</creator><creator>Kosalaraksa, Pope</creator><creator>Martinez Vargas, Luis</creator><creator>Yu, Delia</creator><creator>Watanaveeradej, Veerachai</creator><creator>Espinoza, Felix</creator><creator>Dietze, Reynaldo</creator><creator>Fernando, LakKumar</creator><creator>Wickramasinghe, Pujitha</creator><creator>Duarte MoreiraJr, Edson</creator><creator>Fernando, Asvini D</creator><creator>Gunasekera, Dulanie</creator><creator>Luz, Kleber</creator><creator>Venâncioda Cunha, Rivaldo</creator><creator>Rauscher, Martina</creator><creator>Zent, Olaf</creator><creator>Liu, Mengya</creator><creator>Hoffman, Elaine</creator><creator>LeFevre, Inge</creator><creator>Tricou, Vianney</creator><creator>Wallace, Derek</creator><creator>Alera, MariaTheresa</creator><creator>Borkowski, Astrid</creator><general>Oxford University Press</general><scope>TOX</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20220824</creationdate><title>Three-year Efficacy and Safety of Takeda’s Dengue Vaccine Candidate (TAK-003)</title><author>Rivera, Luis ; Biswal, Shibadas ; Sáez-Llorens, Xavier ; Reynales, Humberto ; López-Medina, Eduardo ; Borja-Tabora, Charissa ; Bravo, Lulu ; Sirivichayakul, Chukiat ; Kosalaraksa, Pope ; Martinez Vargas, Luis ; Yu, Delia ; Watanaveeradej, Veerachai ; Espinoza, Felix ; Dietze, Reynaldo ; Fernando, LakKumar ; Wickramasinghe, Pujitha ; Duarte MoreiraJr, Edson ; Fernando, Asvini D ; Gunasekera, Dulanie ; Luz, Kleber ; Venâncioda Cunha, Rivaldo ; Rauscher, Martina ; Zent, Olaf ; Liu, Mengya ; Hoffman, Elaine ; LeFevre, Inge ; Tricou, Vianney ; Wallace, Derek ; Alera, MariaTheresa ; Borkowski, Astrid</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c389t-db076ded3877749bd34e2772c8e290fdd62d2e28ddb14ee0192b04b5568c51263</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2022</creationdate><topic>Major</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Rivera, Luis</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Biswal, Shibadas</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sáez-Llorens, Xavier</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Reynales, Humberto</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>López-Medina, Eduardo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Borja-Tabora, Charissa</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bravo, Lulu</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sirivichayakul, Chukiat</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kosalaraksa, Pope</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Martinez Vargas, Luis</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yu, Delia</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Watanaveeradej, Veerachai</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Espinoza, Felix</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dietze, Reynaldo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fernando, LakKumar</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wickramasinghe, Pujitha</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Duarte MoreiraJr, Edson</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fernando, Asvini D</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gunasekera, Dulanie</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Luz, Kleber</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Venâncioda Cunha, Rivaldo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rauscher, Martina</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zent, Olaf</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Liu, Mengya</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hoffman, Elaine</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>LeFevre, Inge</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tricou, Vianney</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wallace, Derek</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Alera, MariaTheresa</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Borkowski, Astrid</creatorcontrib><collection>Oxford Journals Open Access Collection</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>Clinical infectious diseases</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Rivera, Luis</au><au>Biswal, Shibadas</au><au>Sáez-Llorens, Xavier</au><au>Reynales, Humberto</au><au>López-Medina, Eduardo</au><au>Borja-Tabora, Charissa</au><au>Bravo, Lulu</au><au>Sirivichayakul, Chukiat</au><au>Kosalaraksa, Pope</au><au>Martinez Vargas, Luis</au><au>Yu, Delia</au><au>Watanaveeradej, Veerachai</au><au>Espinoza, Felix</au><au>Dietze, Reynaldo</au><au>Fernando, LakKumar</au><au>Wickramasinghe, Pujitha</au><au>Duarte MoreiraJr, Edson</au><au>Fernando, Asvini D</au><au>Gunasekera, Dulanie</au><au>Luz, Kleber</au><au>Venâncioda Cunha, Rivaldo</au><au>Rauscher, Martina</au><au>Zent, Olaf</au><au>Liu, Mengya</au><au>Hoffman, Elaine</au><au>LeFevre, Inge</au><au>Tricou, Vianney</au><au>Wallace, Derek</au><au>Alera, MariaTheresa</au><au>Borkowski, Astrid</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Three-year Efficacy and Safety of Takeda’s Dengue Vaccine Candidate (TAK-003)</atitle><jtitle>Clinical infectious diseases</jtitle><date>2022-08-24</date><risdate>2022</risdate><volume>75</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>107</spage><epage>117</epage><pages>107-117</pages><issn>1058-4838</issn><eissn>1537-6591</eissn><abstract>Abstract
Background
Takeda’s live attenuated tetravalent dengue vaccine candidate (TAK-003) is under evaluation in a long-term clinical trial across 8 dengue-endemic countries. Previously, we have reported its efficacy and safety in both seronegative and seropositive participants and that its performance varies by serotype, with some decline in efficacy from first to second year postvaccination. This exploratory analysis provides an update with cumulative and third-year data.
Methods
Healthy 4–16 year olds (n = 20099) were randomized 2:1 to receive TAK-003 or placebo (0, 3 month schedule). The protocol included baseline serostatus testing of all participants and detection of all symptomatic dengue throughout the trial with a serotype specific reverse transcriptase-polymerase chain reaction.
Results
Cumulative efficacy after 3 years was 62.0% (95% confidence interval, 56.6–66.7) against virologically confirmed dengue (VCD) and 83.6% (76.8–88.4) against hospitalized VCD. Efficacy was 54.3% (41.9–64.1) against VCD and 77.1% (58.6–87.3) against hospitalized VCD in baseline seronegatives, and 65.0% (58.9–70.1) against VCD and 86.0% (78.4–91.0) against hospitalized VCD in baseline seropositives. Efficacy against VCD during the third year declined to 44.7% (32.5–54.7), whereas efficacy against hospitalized VCD was sustained at 70.8% (49.6–83.0). Rates of serious adverse events were 2.9% in TAK-003 group and 3.5% in placebo group during the ongoing long-term follow-up (ie, second half of the 3 years following vaccination), but none were related. No important safety risks were identified.
Conclusions
TAK-003 was efficacious against symptomatic dengue over 3 years. Efficacy declined over time but remained robust against hospitalized dengue. A booster dose evaluation is planned.
This ongoing phase 3 study demonstrated that TAK-003 was efficacious against symptomatic dengue in children and adolescents in a varied epidemiological setting across 8 dengue-endemic countries over 3 years postvaccination, and supports the utility of TAK-003 in dengue control.</abstract><cop>US</cop><pub>Oxford University Press</pub><pmid>34606595</pmid><doi>10.1093/cid/ciab864</doi><tpages>11</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1058-4838 |
ispartof | Clinical infectious diseases, 2022-08, Vol.75 (1), p.107-117 |
issn | 1058-4838 1537-6591 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_9402653 |
source | Oxford University Press Journals All Titles (1996-Current); EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals; Alma/SFX Local Collection |
subjects | Major |
title | Three-year Efficacy and Safety of Takeda’s Dengue Vaccine Candidate (TAK-003) |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-08T19%3A16%3A33IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Three-year%20Efficacy%20and%20Safety%20of%20Takeda%E2%80%99s%20Dengue%20Vaccine%20Candidate%20(TAK-003)&rft.jtitle=Clinical%20infectious%20diseases&rft.au=Rivera,%20Luis&rft.date=2022-08-24&rft.volume=75&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=107&rft.epage=117&rft.pages=107-117&rft.issn=1058-4838&rft.eissn=1537-6591&rft_id=info:doi/10.1093/cid/ciab864&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E2579377104%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2579377104&rft_id=info:pmid/34606595&rft_oup_id=10.1093/cid/ciab864&rfr_iscdi=true |