Repeat Annual Colorectal Cancer Screening in Rural Community Clinics: A Randomized Clinical Trial to Evaluate Outreach Strategies to Sustain Screening

Purpose The majority of colorectal cancer (CRC) research using the fecal immunochemical test (FIT) has studied short‐term screening results in predominantly urban areas. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the effectiveness of 2 outreach strategies embedded in a health literacy intervention on...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:The Journal of rural health 2020-06, Vol.36 (3), p.307-315
Hauptverfasser: Davis, Terry C., Rademaker, Alfred, Morris, James, Ferguson, Laurie Anne, Wiltz, Gary, Arnold, Connie L.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 315
container_issue 3
container_start_page 307
container_title The Journal of rural health
container_volume 36
creator Davis, Terry C.
Rademaker, Alfred
Morris, James
Ferguson, Laurie Anne
Wiltz, Gary
Arnold, Connie L.
description Purpose The majority of colorectal cancer (CRC) research using the fecal immunochemical test (FIT) has studied short‐term screening results in predominantly urban areas. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the effectiveness of 2 outreach strategies embedded in a health literacy intervention on repeat CRC screening in rural community clinics. Methods A 2‐arm randomized controlled trial was conducted in 4 rural clinics in Louisiana. During a regularly scheduled clinic visit, participants ages 50–75 received a FIT kit and brief educational intervention. Participants were randomized to receive an automated call or a personal call by a prevention counselor after 4 weeks and 8 weeks if FIT kits were not returned. In year 2, materials were mailed, and follow‐up calls were conducted as in year 1. The primary outcome was repeat FIT—the return of the FIT kit in both years. Participants Of 568 eligible participants, 55% were female, 67% were African American, and 39% had low health literacy. Findings Repeat FIT rates were 36.5% for those receiving the automated call and 33.6% for those receiving a personal call (P = .30). No annual FITs were returned in 30% of participants, while only 1 FIT was returned by 35% of participants (31% only year 1 and 4% only year 2). Conclusion Sustaining CRC screening with FIT is challenging in rural clinics. A lower cost automated call was just as effective as the personal call in promoting repeat annual screening. However, more intensive strategies are needed to improve long‐term FIT screening among rural participants.
doi_str_mv 10.1111/jrh.12399
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_9396927</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2290967205</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4439-85467d65b00b7d8269304849d5bfcbb6ef3239d13e6207c40b09afe4886091ca3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kdGOEyEUhonRuHX1whcwJN7oRXdhYBjwwqRpVlezySbtmnhHGOZMSzMDFWbW1AfxeaXb2qiJXMCB8-Xnhx-hl5Rc0DwuN3F9QQum1CM0oRWXU8IEfYwmRCoyrUT59Qw9S2lDSKEk40_RGaNlwSSXE_RzAVswA555P5oOz0MXIthhXxpvIeKljQDe-RV2Hi_G-AD1_ejdsMPzznln0zs8wwvjm9C7H9AcTzN4F12eh4Cv7k03mgHw7ThEMHaNl0PM-5WDtO8vxzSYrH-67Dl60pouwYvjeo6-fLi6m19Pb24_fprPbqaWc6amsuSiakRZE1JXjSyEYoRLrpqybm1dC2hZ_paGMhAFqSwnNVGmBS6lIIpaw87R-4Pudqx7aCz47KvT2-h6E3c6GKf_7ni31qtwrxVTQhVVFnhzFIjh2whp0L1LFrrOeAhj0kWhiBJVQcqMvv4H3YQx-vw8XXBaScFkSTL19kDZGFKK0J7MUKL3aeuctn5IO7Ov_nR_In_Hm4HLA_DddbD7v5L-vLg-SP4COYG2BA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2417863850</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Repeat Annual Colorectal Cancer Screening in Rural Community Clinics: A Randomized Clinical Trial to Evaluate Outreach Strategies to Sustain Screening</title><source>Applied Social Sciences Index &amp; Abstracts (ASSIA)</source><source>Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete</source><source>PAIS Index</source><source>Sociological Abstracts</source><creator>Davis, Terry C. ; Rademaker, Alfred ; Morris, James ; Ferguson, Laurie Anne ; Wiltz, Gary ; Arnold, Connie L.</creator><creatorcontrib>Davis, Terry C. ; Rademaker, Alfred ; Morris, James ; Ferguson, Laurie Anne ; Wiltz, Gary ; Arnold, Connie L.</creatorcontrib><description>Purpose The majority of colorectal cancer (CRC) research using the fecal immunochemical test (FIT) has studied short‐term screening results in predominantly urban areas. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the effectiveness of 2 outreach strategies embedded in a health literacy intervention on repeat CRC screening in rural community clinics. Methods A 2‐arm randomized controlled trial was conducted in 4 rural clinics in Louisiana. During a regularly scheduled clinic visit, participants ages 50–75 received a FIT kit and brief educational intervention. Participants were randomized to receive an automated call or a personal call by a prevention counselor after 4 weeks and 8 weeks if FIT kits were not returned. In year 2, materials were mailed, and follow‐up calls were conducted as in year 1. The primary outcome was repeat FIT—the return of the FIT kit in both years. Participants Of 568 eligible participants, 55% were female, 67% were African American, and 39% had low health literacy. Findings Repeat FIT rates were 36.5% for those receiving the automated call and 33.6% for those receiving a personal call (P = .30). No annual FITs were returned in 30% of participants, while only 1 FIT was returned by 35% of participants (31% only year 1 and 4% only year 2). Conclusion Sustaining CRC screening with FIT is challenging in rural clinics. A lower cost automated call was just as effective as the personal call in promoting repeat annual screening. However, more intensive strategies are needed to improve long‐term FIT screening among rural participants.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0890-765X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1748-0361</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1111/jrh.12399</identifier><identifier>PMID: 31523848</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>England: Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</publisher><subject>African Americans ; Automation ; Brief interventions ; Cancer ; Cancer screening ; Clinical research ; Clinical trials ; Clinics ; Colorectal cancer ; Colorectal carcinoma ; Community health services ; Counseling ; Educational programs ; fecal immunochemical test ; Health education ; Health literacy ; Intervention ; Literacy ; Medical screening ; Outreach programs ; Prevention ; repeat colorectal cancer screening ; Rural areas ; Rural communities ; rural community clinics ; Rural health care ; Strategies ; telephone follow‐up strategies ; Tests ; Urban areas</subject><ispartof>The Journal of rural health, 2020-06, Vol.36 (3), p.307-315</ispartof><rights>2019 National Rural Health Association</rights><rights>2019 National Rural Health Association.</rights><rights>2020 National Rural Health Association</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4439-85467d65b00b7d8269304849d5bfcbb6ef3239d13e6207c40b09afe4886091ca3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4439-85467d65b00b7d8269304849d5bfcbb6ef3239d13e6207c40b09afe4886091ca3</cites><orcidid>0000-0001-8961-2342</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1111%2Fjrh.12399$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111%2Fjrh.12399$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,776,780,881,1411,27843,27901,27902,30976,33751,45550,45551</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31523848$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Davis, Terry C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rademaker, Alfred</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Morris, James</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ferguson, Laurie Anne</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wiltz, Gary</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Arnold, Connie L.</creatorcontrib><title>Repeat Annual Colorectal Cancer Screening in Rural Community Clinics: A Randomized Clinical Trial to Evaluate Outreach Strategies to Sustain Screening</title><title>The Journal of rural health</title><addtitle>J Rural Health</addtitle><description>Purpose The majority of colorectal cancer (CRC) research using the fecal immunochemical test (FIT) has studied short‐term screening results in predominantly urban areas. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the effectiveness of 2 outreach strategies embedded in a health literacy intervention on repeat CRC screening in rural community clinics. Methods A 2‐arm randomized controlled trial was conducted in 4 rural clinics in Louisiana. During a regularly scheduled clinic visit, participants ages 50–75 received a FIT kit and brief educational intervention. Participants were randomized to receive an automated call or a personal call by a prevention counselor after 4 weeks and 8 weeks if FIT kits were not returned. In year 2, materials were mailed, and follow‐up calls were conducted as in year 1. The primary outcome was repeat FIT—the return of the FIT kit in both years. Participants Of 568 eligible participants, 55% were female, 67% were African American, and 39% had low health literacy. Findings Repeat FIT rates were 36.5% for those receiving the automated call and 33.6% for those receiving a personal call (P = .30). No annual FITs were returned in 30% of participants, while only 1 FIT was returned by 35% of participants (31% only year 1 and 4% only year 2). Conclusion Sustaining CRC screening with FIT is challenging in rural clinics. A lower cost automated call was just as effective as the personal call in promoting repeat annual screening. However, more intensive strategies are needed to improve long‐term FIT screening among rural participants.</description><subject>African Americans</subject><subject>Automation</subject><subject>Brief interventions</subject><subject>Cancer</subject><subject>Cancer screening</subject><subject>Clinical research</subject><subject>Clinical trials</subject><subject>Clinics</subject><subject>Colorectal cancer</subject><subject>Colorectal carcinoma</subject><subject>Community health services</subject><subject>Counseling</subject><subject>Educational programs</subject><subject>fecal immunochemical test</subject><subject>Health education</subject><subject>Health literacy</subject><subject>Intervention</subject><subject>Literacy</subject><subject>Medical screening</subject><subject>Outreach programs</subject><subject>Prevention</subject><subject>repeat colorectal cancer screening</subject><subject>Rural areas</subject><subject>Rural communities</subject><subject>rural community clinics</subject><subject>Rural health care</subject><subject>Strategies</subject><subject>telephone follow‐up strategies</subject><subject>Tests</subject><subject>Urban areas</subject><issn>0890-765X</issn><issn>1748-0361</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2020</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>7QJ</sourceid><sourceid>7TQ</sourceid><sourceid>BHHNA</sourceid><recordid>eNp1kdGOEyEUhonRuHX1whcwJN7oRXdhYBjwwqRpVlezySbtmnhHGOZMSzMDFWbW1AfxeaXb2qiJXMCB8-Xnhx-hl5Rc0DwuN3F9QQum1CM0oRWXU8IEfYwmRCoyrUT59Qw9S2lDSKEk40_RGaNlwSSXE_RzAVswA555P5oOz0MXIthhXxpvIeKljQDe-RV2Hi_G-AD1_ejdsMPzznln0zs8wwvjm9C7H9AcTzN4F12eh4Cv7k03mgHw7ThEMHaNl0PM-5WDtO8vxzSYrH-67Dl60pouwYvjeo6-fLi6m19Pb24_fprPbqaWc6amsuSiakRZE1JXjSyEYoRLrpqybm1dC2hZ_paGMhAFqSwnNVGmBS6lIIpaw87R-4Pudqx7aCz47KvT2-h6E3c6GKf_7ni31qtwrxVTQhVVFnhzFIjh2whp0L1LFrrOeAhj0kWhiBJVQcqMvv4H3YQx-vw8XXBaScFkSTL19kDZGFKK0J7MUKL3aeuctn5IO7Ov_nR_In_Hm4HLA_DddbD7v5L-vLg-SP4COYG2BA</recordid><startdate>20200601</startdate><enddate>20200601</enddate><creator>Davis, Terry C.</creator><creator>Rademaker, Alfred</creator><creator>Morris, James</creator><creator>Ferguson, Laurie Anne</creator><creator>Wiltz, Gary</creator><creator>Arnold, Connie L.</creator><general>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</general><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QJ</scope><scope>7T2</scope><scope>7TQ</scope><scope>7U3</scope><scope>BHHNA</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>DHY</scope><scope>DON</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8961-2342</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20200601</creationdate><title>Repeat Annual Colorectal Cancer Screening in Rural Community Clinics: A Randomized Clinical Trial to Evaluate Outreach Strategies to Sustain Screening</title><author>Davis, Terry C. ; Rademaker, Alfred ; Morris, James ; Ferguson, Laurie Anne ; Wiltz, Gary ; Arnold, Connie L.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4439-85467d65b00b7d8269304849d5bfcbb6ef3239d13e6207c40b09afe4886091ca3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2020</creationdate><topic>African Americans</topic><topic>Automation</topic><topic>Brief interventions</topic><topic>Cancer</topic><topic>Cancer screening</topic><topic>Clinical research</topic><topic>Clinical trials</topic><topic>Clinics</topic><topic>Colorectal cancer</topic><topic>Colorectal carcinoma</topic><topic>Community health services</topic><topic>Counseling</topic><topic>Educational programs</topic><topic>fecal immunochemical test</topic><topic>Health education</topic><topic>Health literacy</topic><topic>Intervention</topic><topic>Literacy</topic><topic>Medical screening</topic><topic>Outreach programs</topic><topic>Prevention</topic><topic>repeat colorectal cancer screening</topic><topic>Rural areas</topic><topic>Rural communities</topic><topic>rural community clinics</topic><topic>Rural health care</topic><topic>Strategies</topic><topic>telephone follow‐up strategies</topic><topic>Tests</topic><topic>Urban areas</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Davis, Terry C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rademaker, Alfred</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Morris, James</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ferguson, Laurie Anne</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wiltz, Gary</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Arnold, Connie L.</creatorcontrib><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Applied Social Sciences Index &amp; Abstracts (ASSIA)</collection><collection>Health and Safety Science Abstracts (Full archive)</collection><collection>PAIS Index</collection><collection>Social Services Abstracts</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>PAIS International</collection><collection>PAIS International (Ovid)</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>The Journal of rural health</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Davis, Terry C.</au><au>Rademaker, Alfred</au><au>Morris, James</au><au>Ferguson, Laurie Anne</au><au>Wiltz, Gary</au><au>Arnold, Connie L.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Repeat Annual Colorectal Cancer Screening in Rural Community Clinics: A Randomized Clinical Trial to Evaluate Outreach Strategies to Sustain Screening</atitle><jtitle>The Journal of rural health</jtitle><addtitle>J Rural Health</addtitle><date>2020-06-01</date><risdate>2020</risdate><volume>36</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>307</spage><epage>315</epage><pages>307-315</pages><issn>0890-765X</issn><eissn>1748-0361</eissn><abstract>Purpose The majority of colorectal cancer (CRC) research using the fecal immunochemical test (FIT) has studied short‐term screening results in predominantly urban areas. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the effectiveness of 2 outreach strategies embedded in a health literacy intervention on repeat CRC screening in rural community clinics. Methods A 2‐arm randomized controlled trial was conducted in 4 rural clinics in Louisiana. During a regularly scheduled clinic visit, participants ages 50–75 received a FIT kit and brief educational intervention. Participants were randomized to receive an automated call or a personal call by a prevention counselor after 4 weeks and 8 weeks if FIT kits were not returned. In year 2, materials were mailed, and follow‐up calls were conducted as in year 1. The primary outcome was repeat FIT—the return of the FIT kit in both years. Participants Of 568 eligible participants, 55% were female, 67% were African American, and 39% had low health literacy. Findings Repeat FIT rates were 36.5% for those receiving the automated call and 33.6% for those receiving a personal call (P = .30). No annual FITs were returned in 30% of participants, while only 1 FIT was returned by 35% of participants (31% only year 1 and 4% only year 2). Conclusion Sustaining CRC screening with FIT is challenging in rural clinics. A lower cost automated call was just as effective as the personal call in promoting repeat annual screening. However, more intensive strategies are needed to improve long‐term FIT screening among rural participants.</abstract><cop>England</cop><pub>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</pub><pmid>31523848</pmid><doi>10.1111/jrh.12399</doi><tpages>9</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8961-2342</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0890-765X
ispartof The Journal of rural health, 2020-06, Vol.36 (3), p.307-315
issn 0890-765X
1748-0361
language eng
recordid cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_9396927
source Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA); Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete; PAIS Index; Sociological Abstracts
subjects African Americans
Automation
Brief interventions
Cancer
Cancer screening
Clinical research
Clinical trials
Clinics
Colorectal cancer
Colorectal carcinoma
Community health services
Counseling
Educational programs
fecal immunochemical test
Health education
Health literacy
Intervention
Literacy
Medical screening
Outreach programs
Prevention
repeat colorectal cancer screening
Rural areas
Rural communities
rural community clinics
Rural health care
Strategies
telephone follow‐up strategies
Tests
Urban areas
title Repeat Annual Colorectal Cancer Screening in Rural Community Clinics: A Randomized Clinical Trial to Evaluate Outreach Strategies to Sustain Screening
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-28T15%3A59%3A38IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Repeat%20Annual%20Colorectal%20Cancer%20Screening%20in%20Rural%20Community%20Clinics:%20A%20Randomized%20Clinical%20Trial%20to%20Evaluate%20Outreach%20Strategies%20to%20Sustain%20Screening&rft.jtitle=The%20Journal%20of%20rural%20health&rft.au=Davis,%20Terry%20C.&rft.date=2020-06-01&rft.volume=36&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=307&rft.epage=315&rft.pages=307-315&rft.issn=0890-765X&rft.eissn=1748-0361&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111/jrh.12399&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E2290967205%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2417863850&rft_id=info:pmid/31523848&rfr_iscdi=true