Repeat Annual Colorectal Cancer Screening in Rural Community Clinics: A Randomized Clinical Trial to Evaluate Outreach Strategies to Sustain Screening
Purpose The majority of colorectal cancer (CRC) research using the fecal immunochemical test (FIT) has studied short‐term screening results in predominantly urban areas. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the effectiveness of 2 outreach strategies embedded in a health literacy intervention on...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | The Journal of rural health 2020-06, Vol.36 (3), p.307-315 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 315 |
---|---|
container_issue | 3 |
container_start_page | 307 |
container_title | The Journal of rural health |
container_volume | 36 |
creator | Davis, Terry C. Rademaker, Alfred Morris, James Ferguson, Laurie Anne Wiltz, Gary Arnold, Connie L. |
description | Purpose
The majority of colorectal cancer (CRC) research using the fecal immunochemical test (FIT) has studied short‐term screening results in predominantly urban areas. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the effectiveness of 2 outreach strategies embedded in a health literacy intervention on repeat CRC screening in rural community clinics.
Methods
A 2‐arm randomized controlled trial was conducted in 4 rural clinics in Louisiana. During a regularly scheduled clinic visit, participants ages 50–75 received a FIT kit and brief educational intervention. Participants were randomized to receive an automated call or a personal call by a prevention counselor after 4 weeks and 8 weeks if FIT kits were not returned. In year 2, materials were mailed, and follow‐up calls were conducted as in year 1. The primary outcome was repeat FIT—the return of the FIT kit in both years.
Participants
Of 568 eligible participants, 55% were female, 67% were African American, and 39% had low health literacy.
Findings
Repeat FIT rates were 36.5% for those receiving the automated call and 33.6% for those receiving a personal call (P = .30). No annual FITs were returned in 30% of participants, while only 1 FIT was returned by 35% of participants (31% only year 1 and 4% only year 2).
Conclusion
Sustaining CRC screening with FIT is challenging in rural clinics. A lower cost automated call was just as effective as the personal call in promoting repeat annual screening. However, more intensive strategies are needed to improve long‐term FIT screening among rural participants. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1111/jrh.12399 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_9396927</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2290967205</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4439-85467d65b00b7d8269304849d5bfcbb6ef3239d13e6207c40b09afe4886091ca3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kdGOEyEUhonRuHX1whcwJN7oRXdhYBjwwqRpVlezySbtmnhHGOZMSzMDFWbW1AfxeaXb2qiJXMCB8-Xnhx-hl5Rc0DwuN3F9QQum1CM0oRWXU8IEfYwmRCoyrUT59Qw9S2lDSKEk40_RGaNlwSSXE_RzAVswA555P5oOz0MXIthhXxpvIeKljQDe-RV2Hi_G-AD1_ejdsMPzznln0zs8wwvjm9C7H9AcTzN4F12eh4Cv7k03mgHw7ThEMHaNl0PM-5WDtO8vxzSYrH-67Dl60pouwYvjeo6-fLi6m19Pb24_fprPbqaWc6amsuSiakRZE1JXjSyEYoRLrpqybm1dC2hZ_paGMhAFqSwnNVGmBS6lIIpaw87R-4Pudqx7aCz47KvT2-h6E3c6GKf_7ni31qtwrxVTQhVVFnhzFIjh2whp0L1LFrrOeAhj0kWhiBJVQcqMvv4H3YQx-vw8XXBaScFkSTL19kDZGFKK0J7MUKL3aeuctn5IO7Ov_nR_In_Hm4HLA_DddbD7v5L-vLg-SP4COYG2BA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2417863850</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Repeat Annual Colorectal Cancer Screening in Rural Community Clinics: A Randomized Clinical Trial to Evaluate Outreach Strategies to Sustain Screening</title><source>Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA)</source><source>Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete</source><source>PAIS Index</source><source>Sociological Abstracts</source><creator>Davis, Terry C. ; Rademaker, Alfred ; Morris, James ; Ferguson, Laurie Anne ; Wiltz, Gary ; Arnold, Connie L.</creator><creatorcontrib>Davis, Terry C. ; Rademaker, Alfred ; Morris, James ; Ferguson, Laurie Anne ; Wiltz, Gary ; Arnold, Connie L.</creatorcontrib><description>Purpose
The majority of colorectal cancer (CRC) research using the fecal immunochemical test (FIT) has studied short‐term screening results in predominantly urban areas. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the effectiveness of 2 outreach strategies embedded in a health literacy intervention on repeat CRC screening in rural community clinics.
Methods
A 2‐arm randomized controlled trial was conducted in 4 rural clinics in Louisiana. During a regularly scheduled clinic visit, participants ages 50–75 received a FIT kit and brief educational intervention. Participants were randomized to receive an automated call or a personal call by a prevention counselor after 4 weeks and 8 weeks if FIT kits were not returned. In year 2, materials were mailed, and follow‐up calls were conducted as in year 1. The primary outcome was repeat FIT—the return of the FIT kit in both years.
Participants
Of 568 eligible participants, 55% were female, 67% were African American, and 39% had low health literacy.
Findings
Repeat FIT rates were 36.5% for those receiving the automated call and 33.6% for those receiving a personal call (P = .30). No annual FITs were returned in 30% of participants, while only 1 FIT was returned by 35% of participants (31% only year 1 and 4% only year 2).
Conclusion
Sustaining CRC screening with FIT is challenging in rural clinics. A lower cost automated call was just as effective as the personal call in promoting repeat annual screening. However, more intensive strategies are needed to improve long‐term FIT screening among rural participants.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0890-765X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1748-0361</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1111/jrh.12399</identifier><identifier>PMID: 31523848</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>England: Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</publisher><subject>African Americans ; Automation ; Brief interventions ; Cancer ; Cancer screening ; Clinical research ; Clinical trials ; Clinics ; Colorectal cancer ; Colorectal carcinoma ; Community health services ; Counseling ; Educational programs ; fecal immunochemical test ; Health education ; Health literacy ; Intervention ; Literacy ; Medical screening ; Outreach programs ; Prevention ; repeat colorectal cancer screening ; Rural areas ; Rural communities ; rural community clinics ; Rural health care ; Strategies ; telephone follow‐up strategies ; Tests ; Urban areas</subject><ispartof>The Journal of rural health, 2020-06, Vol.36 (3), p.307-315</ispartof><rights>2019 National Rural Health Association</rights><rights>2019 National Rural Health Association.</rights><rights>2020 National Rural Health Association</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4439-85467d65b00b7d8269304849d5bfcbb6ef3239d13e6207c40b09afe4886091ca3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4439-85467d65b00b7d8269304849d5bfcbb6ef3239d13e6207c40b09afe4886091ca3</cites><orcidid>0000-0001-8961-2342</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1111%2Fjrh.12399$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111%2Fjrh.12399$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,776,780,881,1411,27843,27901,27902,30976,33751,45550,45551</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31523848$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Davis, Terry C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rademaker, Alfred</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Morris, James</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ferguson, Laurie Anne</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wiltz, Gary</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Arnold, Connie L.</creatorcontrib><title>Repeat Annual Colorectal Cancer Screening in Rural Community Clinics: A Randomized Clinical Trial to Evaluate Outreach Strategies to Sustain Screening</title><title>The Journal of rural health</title><addtitle>J Rural Health</addtitle><description>Purpose
The majority of colorectal cancer (CRC) research using the fecal immunochemical test (FIT) has studied short‐term screening results in predominantly urban areas. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the effectiveness of 2 outreach strategies embedded in a health literacy intervention on repeat CRC screening in rural community clinics.
Methods
A 2‐arm randomized controlled trial was conducted in 4 rural clinics in Louisiana. During a regularly scheduled clinic visit, participants ages 50–75 received a FIT kit and brief educational intervention. Participants were randomized to receive an automated call or a personal call by a prevention counselor after 4 weeks and 8 weeks if FIT kits were not returned. In year 2, materials were mailed, and follow‐up calls were conducted as in year 1. The primary outcome was repeat FIT—the return of the FIT kit in both years.
Participants
Of 568 eligible participants, 55% were female, 67% were African American, and 39% had low health literacy.
Findings
Repeat FIT rates were 36.5% for those receiving the automated call and 33.6% for those receiving a personal call (P = .30). No annual FITs were returned in 30% of participants, while only 1 FIT was returned by 35% of participants (31% only year 1 and 4% only year 2).
Conclusion
Sustaining CRC screening with FIT is challenging in rural clinics. A lower cost automated call was just as effective as the personal call in promoting repeat annual screening. However, more intensive strategies are needed to improve long‐term FIT screening among rural participants.</description><subject>African Americans</subject><subject>Automation</subject><subject>Brief interventions</subject><subject>Cancer</subject><subject>Cancer screening</subject><subject>Clinical research</subject><subject>Clinical trials</subject><subject>Clinics</subject><subject>Colorectal cancer</subject><subject>Colorectal carcinoma</subject><subject>Community health services</subject><subject>Counseling</subject><subject>Educational programs</subject><subject>fecal immunochemical test</subject><subject>Health education</subject><subject>Health literacy</subject><subject>Intervention</subject><subject>Literacy</subject><subject>Medical screening</subject><subject>Outreach programs</subject><subject>Prevention</subject><subject>repeat colorectal cancer screening</subject><subject>Rural areas</subject><subject>Rural communities</subject><subject>rural community clinics</subject><subject>Rural health care</subject><subject>Strategies</subject><subject>telephone follow‐up strategies</subject><subject>Tests</subject><subject>Urban areas</subject><issn>0890-765X</issn><issn>1748-0361</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2020</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>7QJ</sourceid><sourceid>7TQ</sourceid><sourceid>BHHNA</sourceid><recordid>eNp1kdGOEyEUhonRuHX1whcwJN7oRXdhYBjwwqRpVlezySbtmnhHGOZMSzMDFWbW1AfxeaXb2qiJXMCB8-Xnhx-hl5Rc0DwuN3F9QQum1CM0oRWXU8IEfYwmRCoyrUT59Qw9S2lDSKEk40_RGaNlwSSXE_RzAVswA555P5oOz0MXIthhXxpvIeKljQDe-RV2Hi_G-AD1_ejdsMPzznln0zs8wwvjm9C7H9AcTzN4F12eh4Cv7k03mgHw7ThEMHaNl0PM-5WDtO8vxzSYrH-67Dl60pouwYvjeo6-fLi6m19Pb24_fprPbqaWc6amsuSiakRZE1JXjSyEYoRLrpqybm1dC2hZ_paGMhAFqSwnNVGmBS6lIIpaw87R-4Pudqx7aCz47KvT2-h6E3c6GKf_7ni31qtwrxVTQhVVFnhzFIjh2whp0L1LFrrOeAhj0kWhiBJVQcqMvv4H3YQx-vw8XXBaScFkSTL19kDZGFKK0J7MUKL3aeuctn5IO7Ov_nR_In_Hm4HLA_DddbD7v5L-vLg-SP4COYG2BA</recordid><startdate>20200601</startdate><enddate>20200601</enddate><creator>Davis, Terry C.</creator><creator>Rademaker, Alfred</creator><creator>Morris, James</creator><creator>Ferguson, Laurie Anne</creator><creator>Wiltz, Gary</creator><creator>Arnold, Connie L.</creator><general>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</general><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QJ</scope><scope>7T2</scope><scope>7TQ</scope><scope>7U3</scope><scope>BHHNA</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>DHY</scope><scope>DON</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8961-2342</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20200601</creationdate><title>Repeat Annual Colorectal Cancer Screening in Rural Community Clinics: A Randomized Clinical Trial to Evaluate Outreach Strategies to Sustain Screening</title><author>Davis, Terry C. ; Rademaker, Alfred ; Morris, James ; Ferguson, Laurie Anne ; Wiltz, Gary ; Arnold, Connie L.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4439-85467d65b00b7d8269304849d5bfcbb6ef3239d13e6207c40b09afe4886091ca3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2020</creationdate><topic>African Americans</topic><topic>Automation</topic><topic>Brief interventions</topic><topic>Cancer</topic><topic>Cancer screening</topic><topic>Clinical research</topic><topic>Clinical trials</topic><topic>Clinics</topic><topic>Colorectal cancer</topic><topic>Colorectal carcinoma</topic><topic>Community health services</topic><topic>Counseling</topic><topic>Educational programs</topic><topic>fecal immunochemical test</topic><topic>Health education</topic><topic>Health literacy</topic><topic>Intervention</topic><topic>Literacy</topic><topic>Medical screening</topic><topic>Outreach programs</topic><topic>Prevention</topic><topic>repeat colorectal cancer screening</topic><topic>Rural areas</topic><topic>Rural communities</topic><topic>rural community clinics</topic><topic>Rural health care</topic><topic>Strategies</topic><topic>telephone follow‐up strategies</topic><topic>Tests</topic><topic>Urban areas</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Davis, Terry C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rademaker, Alfred</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Morris, James</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ferguson, Laurie Anne</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wiltz, Gary</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Arnold, Connie L.</creatorcontrib><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA)</collection><collection>Health and Safety Science Abstracts (Full archive)</collection><collection>PAIS Index</collection><collection>Social Services Abstracts</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>PAIS International</collection><collection>PAIS International (Ovid)</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>The Journal of rural health</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Davis, Terry C.</au><au>Rademaker, Alfred</au><au>Morris, James</au><au>Ferguson, Laurie Anne</au><au>Wiltz, Gary</au><au>Arnold, Connie L.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Repeat Annual Colorectal Cancer Screening in Rural Community Clinics: A Randomized Clinical Trial to Evaluate Outreach Strategies to Sustain Screening</atitle><jtitle>The Journal of rural health</jtitle><addtitle>J Rural Health</addtitle><date>2020-06-01</date><risdate>2020</risdate><volume>36</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>307</spage><epage>315</epage><pages>307-315</pages><issn>0890-765X</issn><eissn>1748-0361</eissn><abstract>Purpose
The majority of colorectal cancer (CRC) research using the fecal immunochemical test (FIT) has studied short‐term screening results in predominantly urban areas. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the effectiveness of 2 outreach strategies embedded in a health literacy intervention on repeat CRC screening in rural community clinics.
Methods
A 2‐arm randomized controlled trial was conducted in 4 rural clinics in Louisiana. During a regularly scheduled clinic visit, participants ages 50–75 received a FIT kit and brief educational intervention. Participants were randomized to receive an automated call or a personal call by a prevention counselor after 4 weeks and 8 weeks if FIT kits were not returned. In year 2, materials were mailed, and follow‐up calls were conducted as in year 1. The primary outcome was repeat FIT—the return of the FIT kit in both years.
Participants
Of 568 eligible participants, 55% were female, 67% were African American, and 39% had low health literacy.
Findings
Repeat FIT rates were 36.5% for those receiving the automated call and 33.6% for those receiving a personal call (P = .30). No annual FITs were returned in 30% of participants, while only 1 FIT was returned by 35% of participants (31% only year 1 and 4% only year 2).
Conclusion
Sustaining CRC screening with FIT is challenging in rural clinics. A lower cost automated call was just as effective as the personal call in promoting repeat annual screening. However, more intensive strategies are needed to improve long‐term FIT screening among rural participants.</abstract><cop>England</cop><pub>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</pub><pmid>31523848</pmid><doi>10.1111/jrh.12399</doi><tpages>9</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8961-2342</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0890-765X |
ispartof | The Journal of rural health, 2020-06, Vol.36 (3), p.307-315 |
issn | 0890-765X 1748-0361 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_9396927 |
source | Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA); Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete; PAIS Index; Sociological Abstracts |
subjects | African Americans Automation Brief interventions Cancer Cancer screening Clinical research Clinical trials Clinics Colorectal cancer Colorectal carcinoma Community health services Counseling Educational programs fecal immunochemical test Health education Health literacy Intervention Literacy Medical screening Outreach programs Prevention repeat colorectal cancer screening Rural areas Rural communities rural community clinics Rural health care Strategies telephone follow‐up strategies Tests Urban areas |
title | Repeat Annual Colorectal Cancer Screening in Rural Community Clinics: A Randomized Clinical Trial to Evaluate Outreach Strategies to Sustain Screening |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-28T15%3A59%3A38IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Repeat%20Annual%20Colorectal%20Cancer%20Screening%20in%20Rural%20Community%20Clinics:%20A%20Randomized%20Clinical%20Trial%20to%20Evaluate%20Outreach%20Strategies%20to%20Sustain%20Screening&rft.jtitle=The%20Journal%20of%20rural%20health&rft.au=Davis,%20Terry%20C.&rft.date=2020-06-01&rft.volume=36&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=307&rft.epage=315&rft.pages=307-315&rft.issn=0890-765X&rft.eissn=1748-0361&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111/jrh.12399&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E2290967205%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2417863850&rft_id=info:pmid/31523848&rfr_iscdi=true |