Imaging Features of Aggressive Giant Cell Tumors of the Mobile Spine: Retrospective Analysis of 101 Patients From Single Center
Study Design: Retrospective study. Objectives: Giant cell tumors (GCTs) of the mobile spine can be locally aggressive. This study described and classified the typical and atypical appearance of aggressive spinal GCTs according to imaging findings to help the imaging diagnosis, especially for patient...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Global spine journal 2022-09, Vol.12 (7), p.1449-1461 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 1461 |
---|---|
container_issue | 7 |
container_start_page | 1449 |
container_title | Global spine journal |
container_volume | 12 |
creator | Yuan, Bei Zhang, Lihua Yang, Shaomin Ouyang, Hanqiang Han, Songbo Jiang, Liang Wei, Feng Yuan, Huishu Liu, Xiaoguang Liu, Zhongjun |
description | Study Design:
Retrospective study.
Objectives:
Giant cell tumors (GCTs) of the mobile spine can be locally aggressive. This study described and classified the typical and atypical appearance of aggressive spinal GCTs according to imaging findings to help the imaging diagnosis, especially for patients with rapid neurological deficit that may require emergent surgery without biopsy.
Methods:
Computed tomography (CT) and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) scans of patients diagnosed with aggressive spinal GCTs at single center were reviewed.
Results:
Overall, 101 patients with 100 CT images and 94 MR images were examined. All lesions were osteolytic with cortical destruction; 95 lesions showed epidural extension; 90 were centered in the vertebral body; 82 showed pathological fracture and/or collapse of the vertebral body; 78 had pseudotrabeculation on CT; 80 showed low-to-iso signal intensity or heterogeneous high-signal intensity with cystic areas on the T2-weighted images; 9 showed fluid–fluid level on T2-weighted images; and 61 patients showed marked enhancement on contrast-enhanced CT and/or MRI. Forty-one lesions (40.6%) had at least 1 atypical radiographic feature: 19 involved ≥2 segments; 11 were centered in the posterior neural arch; 10 had a paravertebral mass over 2 segments; 16 showed partial margin sclerosis with partial cortical destruction on CT scans; and 3 showed mineralization within the tumor on CT. Eighty-eight patients underwent CT-guided biopsy with a diagnostic accuracy rate of 94.3%.
Conclusions:
Spinal GCTs might appear more radiologically atypical, and about 40% of the lesions may have at least 1 atypical feature. CT-guided biopsies are recommended for definitive diagnosis. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1177/2192568220982280 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_9393967</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sage_id>10.1177_2192568220982280</sage_id><sourcerecordid>2703859662</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c462t-7596bf65657073f64bd6b70402072a45733d9443a7b3205fa52dc1c1409e13c43</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kd9rFDEQx4MottS--1QCvviymt_Z9EE4Dq8WKkp_PIfsXnabsrs5k2yhT_7rzvXqqQUTSIbJ5zuTmUHoLSUfKNX6I6OGSVUzRgwcNXmBDreuSipDXu7tmh2g45zvCCzFNKfsNTrgXBijJDlEP89H14epxyvvypx8xrHDi74HK4d7j8-Cmwpe-mHA1_MY0-N7ufX4a2zC4PHVJkz-FF_6kmLe-LZsRYvJDQ85PLKUUPzdleCnkvEqxRFfQTpQLsHj0xv0qnND9sdP9xG6WX2-Xn6pLr6dnS8XF1UrFCuVlkY1nZJKaqJ5p0SzVo0mgjCimRNSc742QnCnG86I7Jxk65a2VBDjKW8FP0KfdnE3czP6dQvJkxvsJoXRpQcbXbD_vkzh1vbx3hoOW2kI8P4pQIo_Zp-LHUNuoS9u8nHOlomaKqE4IYC-e4bexTlBT4DShNdQi2JAkR3VQudy8t3-M5TY7YDt8wGD5OTvIvaC3-MEoNoB2fX-T9b_BvwFYw-sCQ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2703859662</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Imaging Features of Aggressive Giant Cell Tumors of the Mobile Spine: Retrospective Analysis of 101 Patients From Single Center</title><source>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</source><source>Sage Journals GOLD Open Access 2024</source><source>Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals</source><source>PubMed Central</source><creator>Yuan, Bei ; Zhang, Lihua ; Yang, Shaomin ; Ouyang, Hanqiang ; Han, Songbo ; Jiang, Liang ; Wei, Feng ; Yuan, Huishu ; Liu, Xiaoguang ; Liu, Zhongjun</creator><creatorcontrib>Yuan, Bei ; Zhang, Lihua ; Yang, Shaomin ; Ouyang, Hanqiang ; Han, Songbo ; Jiang, Liang ; Wei, Feng ; Yuan, Huishu ; Liu, Xiaoguang ; Liu, Zhongjun</creatorcontrib><description>Study Design:
Retrospective study.
Objectives:
Giant cell tumors (GCTs) of the mobile spine can be locally aggressive. This study described and classified the typical and atypical appearance of aggressive spinal GCTs according to imaging findings to help the imaging diagnosis, especially for patients with rapid neurological deficit that may require emergent surgery without biopsy.
Methods:
Computed tomography (CT) and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) scans of patients diagnosed with aggressive spinal GCTs at single center were reviewed.
Results:
Overall, 101 patients with 100 CT images and 94 MR images were examined. All lesions were osteolytic with cortical destruction; 95 lesions showed epidural extension; 90 were centered in the vertebral body; 82 showed pathological fracture and/or collapse of the vertebral body; 78 had pseudotrabeculation on CT; 80 showed low-to-iso signal intensity or heterogeneous high-signal intensity with cystic areas on the T2-weighted images; 9 showed fluid–fluid level on T2-weighted images; and 61 patients showed marked enhancement on contrast-enhanced CT and/or MRI. Forty-one lesions (40.6%) had at least 1 atypical radiographic feature: 19 involved ≥2 segments; 11 were centered in the posterior neural arch; 10 had a paravertebral mass over 2 segments; 16 showed partial margin sclerosis with partial cortical destruction on CT scans; and 3 showed mineralization within the tumor on CT. Eighty-eight patients underwent CT-guided biopsy with a diagnostic accuracy rate of 94.3%.
Conclusions:
Spinal GCTs might appear more radiologically atypical, and about 40% of the lesions may have at least 1 atypical feature. CT-guided biopsies are recommended for definitive diagnosis.</description><identifier>ISSN: 2192-5682</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2192-5690</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1177/2192568220982280</identifier><identifier>PMID: 33499650</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Los Angeles, CA: SAGE Publications</publisher><subject>Biopsy ; Magnetic resonance imaging ; Original ; Spine ; Tumors</subject><ispartof>Global spine journal, 2022-09, Vol.12 (7), p.1449-1461</ispartof><rights>The Author(s) 2021</rights><rights>The Author(s) 2021. This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution – Non-Commercial – No Derivatives License https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><rights>The Author(s) 2021 2021 AO Spine, unless otherwise noted. Manuscript content on this site is licensed under Creative Commons Licenses</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c462t-7596bf65657073f64bd6b70402072a45733d9443a7b3205fa52dc1c1409e13c43</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c462t-7596bf65657073f64bd6b70402072a45733d9443a7b3205fa52dc1c1409e13c43</cites><orcidid>0000-0003-4050-9605</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9393967/pdf/$$EPDF$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9393967/$$EHTML$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,315,728,781,785,865,886,21971,27858,27929,27930,44950,45338,53796,53798</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33499650$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Yuan, Bei</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zhang, Lihua</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yang, Shaomin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ouyang, Hanqiang</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Han, Songbo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jiang, Liang</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wei, Feng</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yuan, Huishu</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Liu, Xiaoguang</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Liu, Zhongjun</creatorcontrib><title>Imaging Features of Aggressive Giant Cell Tumors of the Mobile Spine: Retrospective Analysis of 101 Patients From Single Center</title><title>Global spine journal</title><addtitle>Global Spine J</addtitle><description>Study Design:
Retrospective study.
Objectives:
Giant cell tumors (GCTs) of the mobile spine can be locally aggressive. This study described and classified the typical and atypical appearance of aggressive spinal GCTs according to imaging findings to help the imaging diagnosis, especially for patients with rapid neurological deficit that may require emergent surgery without biopsy.
Methods:
Computed tomography (CT) and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) scans of patients diagnosed with aggressive spinal GCTs at single center were reviewed.
Results:
Overall, 101 patients with 100 CT images and 94 MR images were examined. All lesions were osteolytic with cortical destruction; 95 lesions showed epidural extension; 90 were centered in the vertebral body; 82 showed pathological fracture and/or collapse of the vertebral body; 78 had pseudotrabeculation on CT; 80 showed low-to-iso signal intensity or heterogeneous high-signal intensity with cystic areas on the T2-weighted images; 9 showed fluid–fluid level on T2-weighted images; and 61 patients showed marked enhancement on contrast-enhanced CT and/or MRI. Forty-one lesions (40.6%) had at least 1 atypical radiographic feature: 19 involved ≥2 segments; 11 were centered in the posterior neural arch; 10 had a paravertebral mass over 2 segments; 16 showed partial margin sclerosis with partial cortical destruction on CT scans; and 3 showed mineralization within the tumor on CT. Eighty-eight patients underwent CT-guided biopsy with a diagnostic accuracy rate of 94.3%.
Conclusions:
Spinal GCTs might appear more radiologically atypical, and about 40% of the lesions may have at least 1 atypical feature. CT-guided biopsies are recommended for definitive diagnosis.</description><subject>Biopsy</subject><subject>Magnetic resonance imaging</subject><subject>Original</subject><subject>Spine</subject><subject>Tumors</subject><issn>2192-5682</issn><issn>2192-5690</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2022</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>AFRWT</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><recordid>eNp1kd9rFDEQx4MottS--1QCvviymt_Z9EE4Dq8WKkp_PIfsXnabsrs5k2yhT_7rzvXqqQUTSIbJ5zuTmUHoLSUfKNX6I6OGSVUzRgwcNXmBDreuSipDXu7tmh2g45zvCCzFNKfsNTrgXBijJDlEP89H14epxyvvypx8xrHDi74HK4d7j8-Cmwpe-mHA1_MY0-N7ufX4a2zC4PHVJkz-FF_6kmLe-LZsRYvJDQ85PLKUUPzdleCnkvEqxRFfQTpQLsHj0xv0qnND9sdP9xG6WX2-Xn6pLr6dnS8XF1UrFCuVlkY1nZJKaqJ5p0SzVo0mgjCimRNSc742QnCnG86I7Jxk65a2VBDjKW8FP0KfdnE3czP6dQvJkxvsJoXRpQcbXbD_vkzh1vbx3hoOW2kI8P4pQIo_Zp-LHUNuoS9u8nHOlomaKqE4IYC-e4bexTlBT4DShNdQi2JAkR3VQudy8t3-M5TY7YDt8wGD5OTvIvaC3-MEoNoB2fX-T9b_BvwFYw-sCQ</recordid><startdate>20220901</startdate><enddate>20220901</enddate><creator>Yuan, Bei</creator><creator>Zhang, Lihua</creator><creator>Yang, Shaomin</creator><creator>Ouyang, Hanqiang</creator><creator>Han, Songbo</creator><creator>Jiang, Liang</creator><creator>Wei, Feng</creator><creator>Yuan, Huishu</creator><creator>Liu, Xiaoguang</creator><creator>Liu, Zhongjun</creator><general>SAGE Publications</general><general>Sage Publications Ltd</general><scope>AFRWT</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4050-9605</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20220901</creationdate><title>Imaging Features of Aggressive Giant Cell Tumors of the Mobile Spine: Retrospective Analysis of 101 Patients From Single Center</title><author>Yuan, Bei ; Zhang, Lihua ; Yang, Shaomin ; Ouyang, Hanqiang ; Han, Songbo ; Jiang, Liang ; Wei, Feng ; Yuan, Huishu ; Liu, Xiaoguang ; Liu, Zhongjun</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c462t-7596bf65657073f64bd6b70402072a45733d9443a7b3205fa52dc1c1409e13c43</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2022</creationdate><topic>Biopsy</topic><topic>Magnetic resonance imaging</topic><topic>Original</topic><topic>Spine</topic><topic>Tumors</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Yuan, Bei</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zhang, Lihua</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yang, Shaomin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ouyang, Hanqiang</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Han, Songbo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jiang, Liang</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wei, Feng</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yuan, Huishu</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Liu, Xiaoguang</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Liu, Zhongjun</creatorcontrib><collection>Sage Journals GOLD Open Access 2024</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Access via ProQuest (Open Access)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>Global spine journal</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Yuan, Bei</au><au>Zhang, Lihua</au><au>Yang, Shaomin</au><au>Ouyang, Hanqiang</au><au>Han, Songbo</au><au>Jiang, Liang</au><au>Wei, Feng</au><au>Yuan, Huishu</au><au>Liu, Xiaoguang</au><au>Liu, Zhongjun</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Imaging Features of Aggressive Giant Cell Tumors of the Mobile Spine: Retrospective Analysis of 101 Patients From Single Center</atitle><jtitle>Global spine journal</jtitle><addtitle>Global Spine J</addtitle><date>2022-09-01</date><risdate>2022</risdate><volume>12</volume><issue>7</issue><spage>1449</spage><epage>1461</epage><pages>1449-1461</pages><issn>2192-5682</issn><eissn>2192-5690</eissn><abstract>Study Design:
Retrospective study.
Objectives:
Giant cell tumors (GCTs) of the mobile spine can be locally aggressive. This study described and classified the typical and atypical appearance of aggressive spinal GCTs according to imaging findings to help the imaging diagnosis, especially for patients with rapid neurological deficit that may require emergent surgery without biopsy.
Methods:
Computed tomography (CT) and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) scans of patients diagnosed with aggressive spinal GCTs at single center were reviewed.
Results:
Overall, 101 patients with 100 CT images and 94 MR images were examined. All lesions were osteolytic with cortical destruction; 95 lesions showed epidural extension; 90 were centered in the vertebral body; 82 showed pathological fracture and/or collapse of the vertebral body; 78 had pseudotrabeculation on CT; 80 showed low-to-iso signal intensity or heterogeneous high-signal intensity with cystic areas on the T2-weighted images; 9 showed fluid–fluid level on T2-weighted images; and 61 patients showed marked enhancement on contrast-enhanced CT and/or MRI. Forty-one lesions (40.6%) had at least 1 atypical radiographic feature: 19 involved ≥2 segments; 11 were centered in the posterior neural arch; 10 had a paravertebral mass over 2 segments; 16 showed partial margin sclerosis with partial cortical destruction on CT scans; and 3 showed mineralization within the tumor on CT. Eighty-eight patients underwent CT-guided biopsy with a diagnostic accuracy rate of 94.3%.
Conclusions:
Spinal GCTs might appear more radiologically atypical, and about 40% of the lesions may have at least 1 atypical feature. CT-guided biopsies are recommended for definitive diagnosis.</abstract><cop>Los Angeles, CA</cop><pub>SAGE Publications</pub><pmid>33499650</pmid><doi>10.1177/2192568220982280</doi><tpages>13</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4050-9605</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 2192-5682 |
ispartof | Global spine journal, 2022-09, Vol.12 (7), p.1449-1461 |
issn | 2192-5682 2192-5690 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_9393967 |
source | DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals; Sage Journals GOLD Open Access 2024; Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals; PubMed Central |
subjects | Biopsy Magnetic resonance imaging Original Spine Tumors |
title | Imaging Features of Aggressive Giant Cell Tumors of the Mobile Spine: Retrospective Analysis of 101 Patients From Single Center |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-14T22%3A03%3A18IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Imaging%20Features%20of%20Aggressive%20Giant%20Cell%20Tumors%20of%20the%20Mobile%20Spine:%20Retrospective%20Analysis%20of%20101%20Patients%20From%20Single%20Center&rft.jtitle=Global%20spine%20journal&rft.au=Yuan,%20Bei&rft.date=2022-09-01&rft.volume=12&rft.issue=7&rft.spage=1449&rft.epage=1461&rft.pages=1449-1461&rft.issn=2192-5682&rft.eissn=2192-5690&rft_id=info:doi/10.1177/2192568220982280&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E2703859662%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2703859662&rft_id=info:pmid/33499650&rft_sage_id=10.1177_2192568220982280&rfr_iscdi=true |