Imaging Features of Aggressive Giant Cell Tumors of the Mobile Spine: Retrospective Analysis of 101 Patients From Single Center

Study Design: Retrospective study. Objectives: Giant cell tumors (GCTs) of the mobile spine can be locally aggressive. This study described and classified the typical and atypical appearance of aggressive spinal GCTs according to imaging findings to help the imaging diagnosis, especially for patient...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Global spine journal 2022-09, Vol.12 (7), p.1449-1461
Hauptverfasser: Yuan, Bei, Zhang, Lihua, Yang, Shaomin, Ouyang, Hanqiang, Han, Songbo, Jiang, Liang, Wei, Feng, Yuan, Huishu, Liu, Xiaoguang, Liu, Zhongjun
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 1461
container_issue 7
container_start_page 1449
container_title Global spine journal
container_volume 12
creator Yuan, Bei
Zhang, Lihua
Yang, Shaomin
Ouyang, Hanqiang
Han, Songbo
Jiang, Liang
Wei, Feng
Yuan, Huishu
Liu, Xiaoguang
Liu, Zhongjun
description Study Design: Retrospective study. Objectives: Giant cell tumors (GCTs) of the mobile spine can be locally aggressive. This study described and classified the typical and atypical appearance of aggressive spinal GCTs according to imaging findings to help the imaging diagnosis, especially for patients with rapid neurological deficit that may require emergent surgery without biopsy. Methods: Computed tomography (CT) and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) scans of patients diagnosed with aggressive spinal GCTs at single center were reviewed. Results: Overall, 101 patients with 100 CT images and 94 MR images were examined. All lesions were osteolytic with cortical destruction; 95 lesions showed epidural extension; 90 were centered in the vertebral body; 82 showed pathological fracture and/or collapse of the vertebral body; 78 had pseudotrabeculation on CT; 80 showed low-to-iso signal intensity or heterogeneous high-signal intensity with cystic areas on the T2-weighted images; 9 showed fluid–fluid level on T2-weighted images; and 61 patients showed marked enhancement on contrast-enhanced CT and/or MRI. Forty-one lesions (40.6%) had at least 1 atypical radiographic feature: 19 involved ≥2 segments; 11 were centered in the posterior neural arch; 10 had a paravertebral mass over 2 segments; 16 showed partial margin sclerosis with partial cortical destruction on CT scans; and 3 showed mineralization within the tumor on CT. Eighty-eight patients underwent CT-guided biopsy with a diagnostic accuracy rate of 94.3%. Conclusions: Spinal GCTs might appear more radiologically atypical, and about 40% of the lesions may have at least 1 atypical feature. CT-guided biopsies are recommended for definitive diagnosis.
doi_str_mv 10.1177/2192568220982280
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_9393967</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sage_id>10.1177_2192568220982280</sage_id><sourcerecordid>2703859662</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c462t-7596bf65657073f64bd6b70402072a45733d9443a7b3205fa52dc1c1409e13c43</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kd9rFDEQx4MottS--1QCvviymt_Z9EE4Dq8WKkp_PIfsXnabsrs5k2yhT_7rzvXqqQUTSIbJ5zuTmUHoLSUfKNX6I6OGSVUzRgwcNXmBDreuSipDXu7tmh2g45zvCCzFNKfsNTrgXBijJDlEP89H14epxyvvypx8xrHDi74HK4d7j8-Cmwpe-mHA1_MY0-N7ufX4a2zC4PHVJkz-FF_6kmLe-LZsRYvJDQ85PLKUUPzdleCnkvEqxRFfQTpQLsHj0xv0qnND9sdP9xG6WX2-Xn6pLr6dnS8XF1UrFCuVlkY1nZJKaqJ5p0SzVo0mgjCimRNSc742QnCnG86I7Jxk65a2VBDjKW8FP0KfdnE3czP6dQvJkxvsJoXRpQcbXbD_vkzh1vbx3hoOW2kI8P4pQIo_Zp-LHUNuoS9u8nHOlomaKqE4IYC-e4bexTlBT4DShNdQi2JAkR3VQudy8t3-M5TY7YDt8wGD5OTvIvaC3-MEoNoB2fX-T9b_BvwFYw-sCQ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2703859662</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Imaging Features of Aggressive Giant Cell Tumors of the Mobile Spine: Retrospective Analysis of 101 Patients From Single Center</title><source>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</source><source>Sage Journals GOLD Open Access 2024</source><source>Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals</source><source>PubMed Central</source><creator>Yuan, Bei ; Zhang, Lihua ; Yang, Shaomin ; Ouyang, Hanqiang ; Han, Songbo ; Jiang, Liang ; Wei, Feng ; Yuan, Huishu ; Liu, Xiaoguang ; Liu, Zhongjun</creator><creatorcontrib>Yuan, Bei ; Zhang, Lihua ; Yang, Shaomin ; Ouyang, Hanqiang ; Han, Songbo ; Jiang, Liang ; Wei, Feng ; Yuan, Huishu ; Liu, Xiaoguang ; Liu, Zhongjun</creatorcontrib><description>Study Design: Retrospective study. Objectives: Giant cell tumors (GCTs) of the mobile spine can be locally aggressive. This study described and classified the typical and atypical appearance of aggressive spinal GCTs according to imaging findings to help the imaging diagnosis, especially for patients with rapid neurological deficit that may require emergent surgery without biopsy. Methods: Computed tomography (CT) and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) scans of patients diagnosed with aggressive spinal GCTs at single center were reviewed. Results: Overall, 101 patients with 100 CT images and 94 MR images were examined. All lesions were osteolytic with cortical destruction; 95 lesions showed epidural extension; 90 were centered in the vertebral body; 82 showed pathological fracture and/or collapse of the vertebral body; 78 had pseudotrabeculation on CT; 80 showed low-to-iso signal intensity or heterogeneous high-signal intensity with cystic areas on the T2-weighted images; 9 showed fluid–fluid level on T2-weighted images; and 61 patients showed marked enhancement on contrast-enhanced CT and/or MRI. Forty-one lesions (40.6%) had at least 1 atypical radiographic feature: 19 involved ≥2 segments; 11 were centered in the posterior neural arch; 10 had a paravertebral mass over 2 segments; 16 showed partial margin sclerosis with partial cortical destruction on CT scans; and 3 showed mineralization within the tumor on CT. Eighty-eight patients underwent CT-guided biopsy with a diagnostic accuracy rate of 94.3%. Conclusions: Spinal GCTs might appear more radiologically atypical, and about 40% of the lesions may have at least 1 atypical feature. CT-guided biopsies are recommended for definitive diagnosis.</description><identifier>ISSN: 2192-5682</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2192-5690</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1177/2192568220982280</identifier><identifier>PMID: 33499650</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Los Angeles, CA: SAGE Publications</publisher><subject>Biopsy ; Magnetic resonance imaging ; Original ; Spine ; Tumors</subject><ispartof>Global spine journal, 2022-09, Vol.12 (7), p.1449-1461</ispartof><rights>The Author(s) 2021</rights><rights>The Author(s) 2021. This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution – Non-Commercial – No Derivatives License https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><rights>The Author(s) 2021 2021 AO Spine, unless otherwise noted. Manuscript content on this site is licensed under Creative Commons Licenses</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c462t-7596bf65657073f64bd6b70402072a45733d9443a7b3205fa52dc1c1409e13c43</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c462t-7596bf65657073f64bd6b70402072a45733d9443a7b3205fa52dc1c1409e13c43</cites><orcidid>0000-0003-4050-9605</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9393967/pdf/$$EPDF$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9393967/$$EHTML$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,315,728,781,785,865,886,21971,27858,27929,27930,44950,45338,53796,53798</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33499650$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Yuan, Bei</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zhang, Lihua</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yang, Shaomin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ouyang, Hanqiang</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Han, Songbo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jiang, Liang</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wei, Feng</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yuan, Huishu</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Liu, Xiaoguang</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Liu, Zhongjun</creatorcontrib><title>Imaging Features of Aggressive Giant Cell Tumors of the Mobile Spine: Retrospective Analysis of 101 Patients From Single Center</title><title>Global spine journal</title><addtitle>Global Spine J</addtitle><description>Study Design: Retrospective study. Objectives: Giant cell tumors (GCTs) of the mobile spine can be locally aggressive. This study described and classified the typical and atypical appearance of aggressive spinal GCTs according to imaging findings to help the imaging diagnosis, especially for patients with rapid neurological deficit that may require emergent surgery without biopsy. Methods: Computed tomography (CT) and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) scans of patients diagnosed with aggressive spinal GCTs at single center were reviewed. Results: Overall, 101 patients with 100 CT images and 94 MR images were examined. All lesions were osteolytic with cortical destruction; 95 lesions showed epidural extension; 90 were centered in the vertebral body; 82 showed pathological fracture and/or collapse of the vertebral body; 78 had pseudotrabeculation on CT; 80 showed low-to-iso signal intensity or heterogeneous high-signal intensity with cystic areas on the T2-weighted images; 9 showed fluid–fluid level on T2-weighted images; and 61 patients showed marked enhancement on contrast-enhanced CT and/or MRI. Forty-one lesions (40.6%) had at least 1 atypical radiographic feature: 19 involved ≥2 segments; 11 were centered in the posterior neural arch; 10 had a paravertebral mass over 2 segments; 16 showed partial margin sclerosis with partial cortical destruction on CT scans; and 3 showed mineralization within the tumor on CT. Eighty-eight patients underwent CT-guided biopsy with a diagnostic accuracy rate of 94.3%. Conclusions: Spinal GCTs might appear more radiologically atypical, and about 40% of the lesions may have at least 1 atypical feature. CT-guided biopsies are recommended for definitive diagnosis.</description><subject>Biopsy</subject><subject>Magnetic resonance imaging</subject><subject>Original</subject><subject>Spine</subject><subject>Tumors</subject><issn>2192-5682</issn><issn>2192-5690</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2022</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>AFRWT</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><recordid>eNp1kd9rFDEQx4MottS--1QCvviymt_Z9EE4Dq8WKkp_PIfsXnabsrs5k2yhT_7rzvXqqQUTSIbJ5zuTmUHoLSUfKNX6I6OGSVUzRgwcNXmBDreuSipDXu7tmh2g45zvCCzFNKfsNTrgXBijJDlEP89H14epxyvvypx8xrHDi74HK4d7j8-Cmwpe-mHA1_MY0-N7ufX4a2zC4PHVJkz-FF_6kmLe-LZsRYvJDQ85PLKUUPzdleCnkvEqxRFfQTpQLsHj0xv0qnND9sdP9xG6WX2-Xn6pLr6dnS8XF1UrFCuVlkY1nZJKaqJ5p0SzVo0mgjCimRNSc742QnCnG86I7Jxk65a2VBDjKW8FP0KfdnE3czP6dQvJkxvsJoXRpQcbXbD_vkzh1vbx3hoOW2kI8P4pQIo_Zp-LHUNuoS9u8nHOlomaKqE4IYC-e4bexTlBT4DShNdQi2JAkR3VQudy8t3-M5TY7YDt8wGD5OTvIvaC3-MEoNoB2fX-T9b_BvwFYw-sCQ</recordid><startdate>20220901</startdate><enddate>20220901</enddate><creator>Yuan, Bei</creator><creator>Zhang, Lihua</creator><creator>Yang, Shaomin</creator><creator>Ouyang, Hanqiang</creator><creator>Han, Songbo</creator><creator>Jiang, Liang</creator><creator>Wei, Feng</creator><creator>Yuan, Huishu</creator><creator>Liu, Xiaoguang</creator><creator>Liu, Zhongjun</creator><general>SAGE Publications</general><general>Sage Publications Ltd</general><scope>AFRWT</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4050-9605</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20220901</creationdate><title>Imaging Features of Aggressive Giant Cell Tumors of the Mobile Spine: Retrospective Analysis of 101 Patients From Single Center</title><author>Yuan, Bei ; Zhang, Lihua ; Yang, Shaomin ; Ouyang, Hanqiang ; Han, Songbo ; Jiang, Liang ; Wei, Feng ; Yuan, Huishu ; Liu, Xiaoguang ; Liu, Zhongjun</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c462t-7596bf65657073f64bd6b70402072a45733d9443a7b3205fa52dc1c1409e13c43</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2022</creationdate><topic>Biopsy</topic><topic>Magnetic resonance imaging</topic><topic>Original</topic><topic>Spine</topic><topic>Tumors</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Yuan, Bei</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zhang, Lihua</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yang, Shaomin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ouyang, Hanqiang</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Han, Songbo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jiang, Liang</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wei, Feng</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yuan, Huishu</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Liu, Xiaoguang</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Liu, Zhongjun</creatorcontrib><collection>Sage Journals GOLD Open Access 2024</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Access via ProQuest (Open Access)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>Global spine journal</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Yuan, Bei</au><au>Zhang, Lihua</au><au>Yang, Shaomin</au><au>Ouyang, Hanqiang</au><au>Han, Songbo</au><au>Jiang, Liang</au><au>Wei, Feng</au><au>Yuan, Huishu</au><au>Liu, Xiaoguang</au><au>Liu, Zhongjun</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Imaging Features of Aggressive Giant Cell Tumors of the Mobile Spine: Retrospective Analysis of 101 Patients From Single Center</atitle><jtitle>Global spine journal</jtitle><addtitle>Global Spine J</addtitle><date>2022-09-01</date><risdate>2022</risdate><volume>12</volume><issue>7</issue><spage>1449</spage><epage>1461</epage><pages>1449-1461</pages><issn>2192-5682</issn><eissn>2192-5690</eissn><abstract>Study Design: Retrospective study. Objectives: Giant cell tumors (GCTs) of the mobile spine can be locally aggressive. This study described and classified the typical and atypical appearance of aggressive spinal GCTs according to imaging findings to help the imaging diagnosis, especially for patients with rapid neurological deficit that may require emergent surgery without biopsy. Methods: Computed tomography (CT) and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) scans of patients diagnosed with aggressive spinal GCTs at single center were reviewed. Results: Overall, 101 patients with 100 CT images and 94 MR images were examined. All lesions were osteolytic with cortical destruction; 95 lesions showed epidural extension; 90 were centered in the vertebral body; 82 showed pathological fracture and/or collapse of the vertebral body; 78 had pseudotrabeculation on CT; 80 showed low-to-iso signal intensity or heterogeneous high-signal intensity with cystic areas on the T2-weighted images; 9 showed fluid–fluid level on T2-weighted images; and 61 patients showed marked enhancement on contrast-enhanced CT and/or MRI. Forty-one lesions (40.6%) had at least 1 atypical radiographic feature: 19 involved ≥2 segments; 11 were centered in the posterior neural arch; 10 had a paravertebral mass over 2 segments; 16 showed partial margin sclerosis with partial cortical destruction on CT scans; and 3 showed mineralization within the tumor on CT. Eighty-eight patients underwent CT-guided biopsy with a diagnostic accuracy rate of 94.3%. Conclusions: Spinal GCTs might appear more radiologically atypical, and about 40% of the lesions may have at least 1 atypical feature. CT-guided biopsies are recommended for definitive diagnosis.</abstract><cop>Los Angeles, CA</cop><pub>SAGE Publications</pub><pmid>33499650</pmid><doi>10.1177/2192568220982280</doi><tpages>13</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4050-9605</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 2192-5682
ispartof Global spine journal, 2022-09, Vol.12 (7), p.1449-1461
issn 2192-5682
2192-5690
language eng
recordid cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_9393967
source DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals; Sage Journals GOLD Open Access 2024; Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals; PubMed Central
subjects Biopsy
Magnetic resonance imaging
Original
Spine
Tumors
title Imaging Features of Aggressive Giant Cell Tumors of the Mobile Spine: Retrospective Analysis of 101 Patients From Single Center
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-14T22%3A03%3A18IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Imaging%20Features%20of%20Aggressive%20Giant%20Cell%20Tumors%20of%20the%20Mobile%20Spine:%20Retrospective%20Analysis%20of%20101%20Patients%20From%20Single%20Center&rft.jtitle=Global%20spine%20journal&rft.au=Yuan,%20Bei&rft.date=2022-09-01&rft.volume=12&rft.issue=7&rft.spage=1449&rft.epage=1461&rft.pages=1449-1461&rft.issn=2192-5682&rft.eissn=2192-5690&rft_id=info:doi/10.1177/2192568220982280&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E2703859662%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2703859662&rft_id=info:pmid/33499650&rft_sage_id=10.1177_2192568220982280&rfr_iscdi=true