Integrated Prediction Framework for Clinical Scores of Cognitive Functions in ESRD Patients

The clinical scores are applied to determine the stage of cognitive function in patients with end-stage renal disease (ESRD). However, accurate clinical scores are hard to come by. This paper proposed an integrated prediction framework with GPLWLSV to predict clinical scores of cognitive functions i...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Computational intelligence and neuroscience 2022-08, Vol.2022, p.1-12
Hauptverfasser: Zhang, Yutao, Sheng, Quan, Fu, Xidong, Shi, Haifeng, Jiao, Zhuqing
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 12
container_issue
container_start_page 1
container_title Computational intelligence and neuroscience
container_volume 2022
creator Zhang, Yutao
Sheng, Quan
Fu, Xidong
Shi, Haifeng
Jiao, Zhuqing
description The clinical scores are applied to determine the stage of cognitive function in patients with end-stage renal disease (ESRD). However, accurate clinical scores are hard to come by. This paper proposed an integrated prediction framework with GPLWLSV to predict clinical scores of cognitive functions in ESRD patients. GPLWLSV incorporated three parts, graph theoretic algorithm (GTA) and principal component analysis (PCA), whale optimization algorithm with Levy flight (LWOA), and least squares support vector regression machine (LSSVRM). GTA was adopted to extract features from the brain functional networks in ESRD patients, while PCA was used to select features. LSSVRM was built to explore the relationship between the selected features and the clinical scores of ESRD patients. Whale optimization algorithm (WOA) was introduced to select better parameters of the kernel function in LSSVRM; it aims to improve the exploration competence of LSSVRM. Levy flight was used to optimize the ability to jump out of local optima in WOA and improve the convergence of coefficient vectors in WOA, which lead to an increase in the generalization ability and convergence speed of WOA. The results validated that the prediction accuracy of GPLWLSV was higher than that of several comparable frameworks, such as GPSV, GPLSV, and GPWLSV. In particular, the average of root mean square error (RMSE), mean absolute error (MAE), and mean absolute percentage error (MAPE) between the predicted scores and the actual scores of ESRD patients was 2.40, 2.06, and 9.83%, respectively. The proposed framework not only can predict the clinical scores more accurately but also can capture imaging markers associated with decline of cognitive function. It helps to understand the potential relationship between structural changes in the brain and cognitive function of ESRD patients.
doi_str_mv 10.1155/2022/8124053
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>gale_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_9381242</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><galeid>A714593256</galeid><sourcerecordid>A714593256</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c410t-9fd48f573c8ecbcf0990b2bbeaa2b5ace68efadae156cc32819ffe68f0a93e423</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kUtP3DAUha2qVXnu-gMsdVOpTPEjTuJNJTQwLRISiMeKhXXjXA-mGZvaCYh_34QZUbULVte69_M51z6EfOLsG-dKHQomxGHNRcGUfEe2eVlXMyUq-f71XKotspPzPWOqUkx8JFtS6VpyVW2T29PQ4zJBjy29SNh62_sY6CLBCp9i-kVdTHTe-eAtdPTKxoSZRkfncRl87x-RLobwcidTH-jJ1eUxvYDeY-jzHvngoMu4v6m75GZxcj3_OTs7_3E6Pzqb2YKzfqZdW9ROVdLWaBvrmNasEU2DAKJRYLGs0UELyFVprRQ1186NTcdASyyE3CXf17oPQ7PC1o7eCTrzkPwK0rOJ4M2_k-DvzDI-Gi2nf5sEvmwEUvw9YO7NymeLXQcB45CNqFhRl1oVckQ__4fexyGF8XkvVKXG5cu_1BI6ND64OPraSdQcVbxQWgo1UQdryqaYc0L3ujJnZsrWTNmaTbYj_nWN3_nQwpN_m_4DMmuicA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2704759906</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Integrated Prediction Framework for Clinical Scores of Cognitive Functions in ESRD Patients</title><source>PubMed Central Open Access</source><source>Wiley-Blackwell Open Access Titles</source><source>EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals</source><source>PubMed Central</source><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><creator>Zhang, Yutao ; Sheng, Quan ; Fu, Xidong ; Shi, Haifeng ; Jiao, Zhuqing</creator><contributor>Gong, Shengrong ; Shengrong Gong</contributor><creatorcontrib>Zhang, Yutao ; Sheng, Quan ; Fu, Xidong ; Shi, Haifeng ; Jiao, Zhuqing ; Gong, Shengrong ; Shengrong Gong</creatorcontrib><description>The clinical scores are applied to determine the stage of cognitive function in patients with end-stage renal disease (ESRD). However, accurate clinical scores are hard to come by. This paper proposed an integrated prediction framework with GPLWLSV to predict clinical scores of cognitive functions in ESRD patients. GPLWLSV incorporated three parts, graph theoretic algorithm (GTA) and principal component analysis (PCA), whale optimization algorithm with Levy flight (LWOA), and least squares support vector regression machine (LSSVRM). GTA was adopted to extract features from the brain functional networks in ESRD patients, while PCA was used to select features. LSSVRM was built to explore the relationship between the selected features and the clinical scores of ESRD patients. Whale optimization algorithm (WOA) was introduced to select better parameters of the kernel function in LSSVRM; it aims to improve the exploration competence of LSSVRM. Levy flight was used to optimize the ability to jump out of local optima in WOA and improve the convergence of coefficient vectors in WOA, which lead to an increase in the generalization ability and convergence speed of WOA. The results validated that the prediction accuracy of GPLWLSV was higher than that of several comparable frameworks, such as GPSV, GPLSV, and GPWLSV. In particular, the average of root mean square error (RMSE), mean absolute error (MAE), and mean absolute percentage error (MAPE) between the predicted scores and the actual scores of ESRD patients was 2.40, 2.06, and 9.83%, respectively. The proposed framework not only can predict the clinical scores more accurately but also can capture imaging markers associated with decline of cognitive function. It helps to understand the potential relationship between structural changes in the brain and cognitive function of ESRD patients.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1687-5265</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1687-5273</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1155/2022/8124053</identifier><identifier>PMID: 35983157</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>New York: Hindawi</publisher><subject>Algorithms ; Brain ; Chronic kidney failure ; Cognitive ability ; Convergence ; End-stage renal disease ; Feature extraction ; Flight ; Hemodialysis ; Kernel functions ; Kidney diseases ; Mathematical optimization ; Medical imaging ; Neuroimaging ; Optimization ; Patients ; Predictions ; Principal components analysis ; Root-mean-square errors ; Support vector machines ; Time series</subject><ispartof>Computational intelligence and neuroscience, 2022-08, Vol.2022, p.1-12</ispartof><rights>Copyright © 2022 Yutao Zhang et al.</rights><rights>COPYRIGHT 2022 John Wiley &amp; Sons, Inc.</rights><rights>Copyright © 2022 Yutao Zhang et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License (the “License”), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0</rights><rights>Copyright © 2022 Yutao Zhang et al. 2022</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c410t-9fd48f573c8ecbcf0990b2bbeaa2b5ace68efadae156cc32819ffe68f0a93e423</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-6547-8449</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9381242/pdf/$$EPDF$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9381242/$$EHTML$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,727,780,784,885,27924,27925,53791,53793</link.rule.ids></links><search><contributor>Gong, Shengrong</contributor><contributor>Shengrong Gong</contributor><creatorcontrib>Zhang, Yutao</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sheng, Quan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fu, Xidong</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Shi, Haifeng</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jiao, Zhuqing</creatorcontrib><title>Integrated Prediction Framework for Clinical Scores of Cognitive Functions in ESRD Patients</title><title>Computational intelligence and neuroscience</title><description>The clinical scores are applied to determine the stage of cognitive function in patients with end-stage renal disease (ESRD). However, accurate clinical scores are hard to come by. This paper proposed an integrated prediction framework with GPLWLSV to predict clinical scores of cognitive functions in ESRD patients. GPLWLSV incorporated three parts, graph theoretic algorithm (GTA) and principal component analysis (PCA), whale optimization algorithm with Levy flight (LWOA), and least squares support vector regression machine (LSSVRM). GTA was adopted to extract features from the brain functional networks in ESRD patients, while PCA was used to select features. LSSVRM was built to explore the relationship between the selected features and the clinical scores of ESRD patients. Whale optimization algorithm (WOA) was introduced to select better parameters of the kernel function in LSSVRM; it aims to improve the exploration competence of LSSVRM. Levy flight was used to optimize the ability to jump out of local optima in WOA and improve the convergence of coefficient vectors in WOA, which lead to an increase in the generalization ability and convergence speed of WOA. The results validated that the prediction accuracy of GPLWLSV was higher than that of several comparable frameworks, such as GPSV, GPLSV, and GPWLSV. In particular, the average of root mean square error (RMSE), mean absolute error (MAE), and mean absolute percentage error (MAPE) between the predicted scores and the actual scores of ESRD patients was 2.40, 2.06, and 9.83%, respectively. The proposed framework not only can predict the clinical scores more accurately but also can capture imaging markers associated with decline of cognitive function. It helps to understand the potential relationship between structural changes in the brain and cognitive function of ESRD patients.</description><subject>Algorithms</subject><subject>Brain</subject><subject>Chronic kidney failure</subject><subject>Cognitive ability</subject><subject>Convergence</subject><subject>End-stage renal disease</subject><subject>Feature extraction</subject><subject>Flight</subject><subject>Hemodialysis</subject><subject>Kernel functions</subject><subject>Kidney diseases</subject><subject>Mathematical optimization</subject><subject>Medical imaging</subject><subject>Neuroimaging</subject><subject>Optimization</subject><subject>Patients</subject><subject>Predictions</subject><subject>Principal components analysis</subject><subject>Root-mean-square errors</subject><subject>Support vector machines</subject><subject>Time series</subject><issn>1687-5265</issn><issn>1687-5273</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2022</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>RHX</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kUtP3DAUha2qVXnu-gMsdVOpTPEjTuJNJTQwLRISiMeKhXXjXA-mGZvaCYh_34QZUbULVte69_M51z6EfOLsG-dKHQomxGHNRcGUfEe2eVlXMyUq-f71XKotspPzPWOqUkx8JFtS6VpyVW2T29PQ4zJBjy29SNh62_sY6CLBCp9i-kVdTHTe-eAtdPTKxoSZRkfncRl87x-RLobwcidTH-jJ1eUxvYDeY-jzHvngoMu4v6m75GZxcj3_OTs7_3E6Pzqb2YKzfqZdW9ROVdLWaBvrmNasEU2DAKJRYLGs0UELyFVprRQ1186NTcdASyyE3CXf17oPQ7PC1o7eCTrzkPwK0rOJ4M2_k-DvzDI-Gi2nf5sEvmwEUvw9YO7NymeLXQcB45CNqFhRl1oVckQ__4fexyGF8XkvVKXG5cu_1BI6ND64OPraSdQcVbxQWgo1UQdryqaYc0L3ujJnZsrWTNmaTbYj_nWN3_nQwpN_m_4DMmuicA</recordid><startdate>20220809</startdate><enddate>20220809</enddate><creator>Zhang, Yutao</creator><creator>Sheng, Quan</creator><creator>Fu, Xidong</creator><creator>Shi, Haifeng</creator><creator>Jiao, Zhuqing</creator><general>Hindawi</general><general>John Wiley &amp; Sons, Inc</general><general>Hindawi Limited</general><scope>RHU</scope><scope>RHW</scope><scope>RHX</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7QF</scope><scope>7QQ</scope><scope>7SC</scope><scope>7SE</scope><scope>7SP</scope><scope>7SR</scope><scope>7TA</scope><scope>7TB</scope><scope>7TK</scope><scope>7U5</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>8AL</scope><scope>8BQ</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FG</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABJCF</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ARAPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BBNVY</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BGLVJ</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>COVID</scope><scope>CWDGH</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>F28</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>H8D</scope><scope>H8G</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>JG9</scope><scope>JQ2</scope><scope>K7-</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>KR7</scope><scope>L6V</scope><scope>L7M</scope><scope>LK8</scope><scope>L~C</scope><scope>L~D</scope><scope>M0N</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M7P</scope><scope>M7S</scope><scope>P5Z</scope><scope>P62</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>PSYQQ</scope><scope>PTHSS</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6547-8449</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20220809</creationdate><title>Integrated Prediction Framework for Clinical Scores of Cognitive Functions in ESRD Patients</title><author>Zhang, Yutao ; Sheng, Quan ; Fu, Xidong ; Shi, Haifeng ; Jiao, Zhuqing</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c410t-9fd48f573c8ecbcf0990b2bbeaa2b5ace68efadae156cc32819ffe68f0a93e423</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2022</creationdate><topic>Algorithms</topic><topic>Brain</topic><topic>Chronic kidney failure</topic><topic>Cognitive ability</topic><topic>Convergence</topic><topic>End-stage renal disease</topic><topic>Feature extraction</topic><topic>Flight</topic><topic>Hemodialysis</topic><topic>Kernel functions</topic><topic>Kidney diseases</topic><topic>Mathematical optimization</topic><topic>Medical imaging</topic><topic>Neuroimaging</topic><topic>Optimization</topic><topic>Patients</topic><topic>Predictions</topic><topic>Principal components analysis</topic><topic>Root-mean-square errors</topic><topic>Support vector machines</topic><topic>Time series</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Zhang, Yutao</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sheng, Quan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fu, Xidong</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Shi, Haifeng</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jiao, Zhuqing</creatorcontrib><collection>Hindawi Publishing Complete</collection><collection>Hindawi Publishing Subscription Journals</collection><collection>Hindawi Publishing Open Access</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Aluminium Industry Abstracts</collection><collection>Ceramic Abstracts</collection><collection>Computer and Information Systems Abstracts</collection><collection>Corrosion Abstracts</collection><collection>Electronics &amp; Communications Abstracts</collection><collection>Engineered Materials Abstracts</collection><collection>Materials Business File</collection><collection>Mechanical &amp; Transportation Engineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Neurosciences Abstracts</collection><collection>Solid State and Superconductivity Abstracts</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Computing Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>METADEX</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Materials Science &amp; Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies &amp; Aerospace Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Technology Collection</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>Coronavirus Research Database</collection><collection>Middle East &amp; Africa Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>ANTE: Abstracts in New Technology &amp; Engineering</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Aerospace Database</collection><collection>Copper Technical Reference Library</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>Materials Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Computer Science Collection</collection><collection>Computer Science Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Civil Engineering Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest Engineering Collection</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies Database with Aerospace</collection><collection>ProQuest Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>Computer and Information Systems Abstracts – Academic</collection><collection>Computer and Information Systems Abstracts Professional</collection><collection>Computing Database</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Biological Science Database</collection><collection>Engineering Database</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies &amp; Aerospace Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Advanced Technologies &amp; Aerospace Collection</collection><collection>Publicly Available Content Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>ProQuest One Psychology</collection><collection>Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>Computational intelligence and neuroscience</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Zhang, Yutao</au><au>Sheng, Quan</au><au>Fu, Xidong</au><au>Shi, Haifeng</au><au>Jiao, Zhuqing</au><au>Gong, Shengrong</au><au>Shengrong Gong</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Integrated Prediction Framework for Clinical Scores of Cognitive Functions in ESRD Patients</atitle><jtitle>Computational intelligence and neuroscience</jtitle><date>2022-08-09</date><risdate>2022</risdate><volume>2022</volume><spage>1</spage><epage>12</epage><pages>1-12</pages><issn>1687-5265</issn><eissn>1687-5273</eissn><abstract>The clinical scores are applied to determine the stage of cognitive function in patients with end-stage renal disease (ESRD). However, accurate clinical scores are hard to come by. This paper proposed an integrated prediction framework with GPLWLSV to predict clinical scores of cognitive functions in ESRD patients. GPLWLSV incorporated three parts, graph theoretic algorithm (GTA) and principal component analysis (PCA), whale optimization algorithm with Levy flight (LWOA), and least squares support vector regression machine (LSSVRM). GTA was adopted to extract features from the brain functional networks in ESRD patients, while PCA was used to select features. LSSVRM was built to explore the relationship between the selected features and the clinical scores of ESRD patients. Whale optimization algorithm (WOA) was introduced to select better parameters of the kernel function in LSSVRM; it aims to improve the exploration competence of LSSVRM. Levy flight was used to optimize the ability to jump out of local optima in WOA and improve the convergence of coefficient vectors in WOA, which lead to an increase in the generalization ability and convergence speed of WOA. The results validated that the prediction accuracy of GPLWLSV was higher than that of several comparable frameworks, such as GPSV, GPLSV, and GPWLSV. In particular, the average of root mean square error (RMSE), mean absolute error (MAE), and mean absolute percentage error (MAPE) between the predicted scores and the actual scores of ESRD patients was 2.40, 2.06, and 9.83%, respectively. The proposed framework not only can predict the clinical scores more accurately but also can capture imaging markers associated with decline of cognitive function. It helps to understand the potential relationship between structural changes in the brain and cognitive function of ESRD patients.</abstract><cop>New York</cop><pub>Hindawi</pub><pmid>35983157</pmid><doi>10.1155/2022/8124053</doi><tpages>12</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6547-8449</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1687-5265
ispartof Computational intelligence and neuroscience, 2022-08, Vol.2022, p.1-12
issn 1687-5265
1687-5273
language eng
recordid cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_9381242
source PubMed Central Open Access; Wiley-Blackwell Open Access Titles; EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals; PubMed Central; Alma/SFX Local Collection
subjects Algorithms
Brain
Chronic kidney failure
Cognitive ability
Convergence
End-stage renal disease
Feature extraction
Flight
Hemodialysis
Kernel functions
Kidney diseases
Mathematical optimization
Medical imaging
Neuroimaging
Optimization
Patients
Predictions
Principal components analysis
Root-mean-square errors
Support vector machines
Time series
title Integrated Prediction Framework for Clinical Scores of Cognitive Functions in ESRD Patients
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-06T17%3A35%3A26IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-gale_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Integrated%20Prediction%20Framework%20for%20Clinical%20Scores%20of%20Cognitive%20Functions%20in%20ESRD%20Patients&rft.jtitle=Computational%20intelligence%20and%20neuroscience&rft.au=Zhang,%20Yutao&rft.date=2022-08-09&rft.volume=2022&rft.spage=1&rft.epage=12&rft.pages=1-12&rft.issn=1687-5265&rft.eissn=1687-5273&rft_id=info:doi/10.1155/2022/8124053&rft_dat=%3Cgale_pubme%3EA714593256%3C/gale_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2704759906&rft_id=info:pmid/35983157&rft_galeid=A714593256&rfr_iscdi=true