HIV Pre-exposure Prophylaxis Implant Stated Preferences and Priorities: Results of a Discrete Choice Experiment Among Women and Adolescent Girls in Gauteng Province, South Africa

For adolescent girls (AG) and young women (YW), adherence barriers may limit the effectiveness of daily oral HIV pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP). Due to its low-burden and long-lasting product attributes, PrEP implants could remove some of the critical adherence barriers of oral PrEP products for in...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:AIDS and behavior 2022-09, Vol.26 (9), p.3099-3109
Hauptverfasser: Little, Kristen M., Flomen, Lola, Hanif, Homaira, Anderson, Sharon M., Thurman, Andrea R., Clark, Meredith R., Doncel, Gustavo F.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 3109
container_issue 9
container_start_page 3099
container_title AIDS and behavior
container_volume 26
creator Little, Kristen M.
Flomen, Lola
Hanif, Homaira
Anderson, Sharon M.
Thurman, Andrea R.
Clark, Meredith R.
Doncel, Gustavo F.
description For adolescent girls (AG) and young women (YW), adherence barriers may limit the effectiveness of daily oral HIV pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP). Due to its low-burden and long-lasting product attributes, PrEP implants could remove some of the critical adherence barriers of oral PrEP products for individuals at risk of HIV. To explore stated preferences for a long-acting PrEP implant, we conducted a quantitative survey and discrete choice experiment with AG (ages 15–17), YW (18–34), and female sex workers (FSW; ≥ 18) in Gauteng Province, South Africa. We completed 600 quantitative surveys across the three subgroups of women. Respondents stated preference for an implant that provided longer HIV protection (24 months versus 6 months) and required a single insertion. They stated that they preferred a biodegradable implant that could be removed within 1 month of insertion. Respondents had no preference for a particular insertion location. Overall, 78% of respondents said they would be likely (33%) or very likely (45%) to use a PrEP implant were one available, with the majority (82%) stating preference for a product that would provide dual protection against HIV and unintended pregnancies. To reduce their risk of HIV, AG, YW, and FSW in our survey reported a strong willingness to use long-acting, highly-effective, dissolvable PrEP implants.
doi_str_mv 10.1007/s10461-022-03658-w
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_9371991</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2646726028</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c404t-b590891dced655e1c46f5a051b807afb627295a504edec48756d2838fd4f82893</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9Uk1v1DAQjRCIloU_wAFZ4sKBgO34I-GAtFrKdqVKIMrH0fI6k11X2TjYSbv9W_xCJt1SPg6c7NG8eTNv5mXZU0ZfMUr168SoUCynnOe0ULLMr-5lx0zqIi-4FPfxTyuaa6bkUfYopQtKaaV09TA7KmShaFkVx9mP09VX8jFCDvs-pDECBqHfXrd27xNZ7frWdgM5H-wA9YRrIELnIBHbTbEP0Q8e0hvyCdLYDomEhljyzicXYQCy2AbvgJzse4h-B0g134VuQ74FDG445nVoIbkptfSxTcR3ZGnHARCFo1x67PaSnIdx2JJ5E72zj7MHjW0TPLl9Z9mX9yefF6f52YflajE_y52gYsjXskKJrHZQKymBOaEaaalk65Jq26wV17ySVlIBNThRaqlqXhZlU4um5LicWfb2wNuP6x3U04jRtqZHITZem2C9-TvT-a3ZhEtTFZpVFUOCF7cEMXwfIQ1mh3uBFlcKYUyGK6E0VxS7zrLn_0Avwhg7lGe4xrNRpYVEFD-gXAwp4THuhmHUTJYwB0sYtIS5sYS5wqJnf8q4K_nlAQQUB0DCVLeB-Lv3f2h_AjIFxUw</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2700906745</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>HIV Pre-exposure Prophylaxis Implant Stated Preferences and Priorities: Results of a Discrete Choice Experiment Among Women and Adolescent Girls in Gauteng Province, South Africa</title><source>Springer Nature - Complete Springer Journals</source><source>Sociological Abstracts</source><creator>Little, Kristen M. ; Flomen, Lola ; Hanif, Homaira ; Anderson, Sharon M. ; Thurman, Andrea R. ; Clark, Meredith R. ; Doncel, Gustavo F.</creator><creatorcontrib>Little, Kristen M. ; Flomen, Lola ; Hanif, Homaira ; Anderson, Sharon M. ; Thurman, Andrea R. ; Clark, Meredith R. ; Doncel, Gustavo F.</creatorcontrib><description>For adolescent girls (AG) and young women (YW), adherence barriers may limit the effectiveness of daily oral HIV pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP). Due to its low-burden and long-lasting product attributes, PrEP implants could remove some of the critical adherence barriers of oral PrEP products for individuals at risk of HIV. To explore stated preferences for a long-acting PrEP implant, we conducted a quantitative survey and discrete choice experiment with AG (ages 15–17), YW (18–34), and female sex workers (FSW; ≥ 18) in Gauteng Province, South Africa. We completed 600 quantitative surveys across the three subgroups of women. Respondents stated preference for an implant that provided longer HIV protection (24 months versus 6 months) and required a single insertion. They stated that they preferred a biodegradable implant that could be removed within 1 month of insertion. Respondents had no preference for a particular insertion location. Overall, 78% of respondents said they would be likely (33%) or very likely (45%) to use a PrEP implant were one available, with the majority (82%) stating preference for a product that would provide dual protection against HIV and unintended pregnancies. To reduce their risk of HIV, AG, YW, and FSW in our survey reported a strong willingness to use long-acting, highly-effective, dissolvable PrEP implants.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1090-7165</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1573-3254</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s10461-022-03658-w</identifier><identifier>PMID: 35360893</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>New York: Springer US</publisher><subject>Adolescence ; Adolescent girls ; Adolescents ; Biodegradability ; Biodegradation ; Disease prevention ; Girls ; Health Psychology ; HIV ; Human immunodeficiency virus ; Implants ; Infectious Diseases ; Insertion ; Medicine ; Medicine &amp; Public Health ; Original Paper ; Polls &amp; surveys ; Preferences ; Prophylaxis ; Prostitution ; Protection ; Public Health ; Sex workers ; Sexually transmitted diseases ; STD ; Subgroups ; Surveys ; Teenagers ; Transplants &amp; implants ; Unwanted pregnancy ; Women ; Womens health ; Young women</subject><ispartof>AIDS and behavior, 2022-09, Vol.26 (9), p.3099-3109</ispartof><rights>The Author(s) 2022</rights><rights>2022. The Author(s).</rights><rights>The Author(s) 2022. This work is published under http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c404t-b590891dced655e1c46f5a051b807afb627295a504edec48756d2838fd4f82893</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c404t-b590891dced655e1c46f5a051b807afb627295a504edec48756d2838fd4f82893</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-4173-6167</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s10461-022-03658-w$$EPDF$$P50$$Gspringer$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/10.1007/s10461-022-03658-w$$EHTML$$P50$$Gspringer$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,776,780,881,27321,27901,27902,33751,41464,42533,51294</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35360893$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Little, Kristen M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Flomen, Lola</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hanif, Homaira</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Anderson, Sharon M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Thurman, Andrea R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Clark, Meredith R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Doncel, Gustavo F.</creatorcontrib><title>HIV Pre-exposure Prophylaxis Implant Stated Preferences and Priorities: Results of a Discrete Choice Experiment Among Women and Adolescent Girls in Gauteng Province, South Africa</title><title>AIDS and behavior</title><addtitle>AIDS Behav</addtitle><addtitle>AIDS Behav</addtitle><description>For adolescent girls (AG) and young women (YW), adherence barriers may limit the effectiveness of daily oral HIV pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP). Due to its low-burden and long-lasting product attributes, PrEP implants could remove some of the critical adherence barriers of oral PrEP products for individuals at risk of HIV. To explore stated preferences for a long-acting PrEP implant, we conducted a quantitative survey and discrete choice experiment with AG (ages 15–17), YW (18–34), and female sex workers (FSW; ≥ 18) in Gauteng Province, South Africa. We completed 600 quantitative surveys across the three subgroups of women. Respondents stated preference for an implant that provided longer HIV protection (24 months versus 6 months) and required a single insertion. They stated that they preferred a biodegradable implant that could be removed within 1 month of insertion. Respondents had no preference for a particular insertion location. Overall, 78% of respondents said they would be likely (33%) or very likely (45%) to use a PrEP implant were one available, with the majority (82%) stating preference for a product that would provide dual protection against HIV and unintended pregnancies. To reduce their risk of HIV, AG, YW, and FSW in our survey reported a strong willingness to use long-acting, highly-effective, dissolvable PrEP implants.</description><subject>Adolescence</subject><subject>Adolescent girls</subject><subject>Adolescents</subject><subject>Biodegradability</subject><subject>Biodegradation</subject><subject>Disease prevention</subject><subject>Girls</subject><subject>Health Psychology</subject><subject>HIV</subject><subject>Human immunodeficiency virus</subject><subject>Implants</subject><subject>Infectious Diseases</subject><subject>Insertion</subject><subject>Medicine</subject><subject>Medicine &amp; Public Health</subject><subject>Original Paper</subject><subject>Polls &amp; surveys</subject><subject>Preferences</subject><subject>Prophylaxis</subject><subject>Prostitution</subject><subject>Protection</subject><subject>Public Health</subject><subject>Sex workers</subject><subject>Sexually transmitted diseases</subject><subject>STD</subject><subject>Subgroups</subject><subject>Surveys</subject><subject>Teenagers</subject><subject>Transplants &amp; implants</subject><subject>Unwanted pregnancy</subject><subject>Women</subject><subject>Womens health</subject><subject>Young women</subject><issn>1090-7165</issn><issn>1573-3254</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2022</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>C6C</sourceid><sourceid>8G5</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>BHHNA</sourceid><sourceid>GUQSH</sourceid><sourceid>M2O</sourceid><recordid>eNp9Uk1v1DAQjRCIloU_wAFZ4sKBgO34I-GAtFrKdqVKIMrH0fI6k11X2TjYSbv9W_xCJt1SPg6c7NG8eTNv5mXZU0ZfMUr168SoUCynnOe0ULLMr-5lx0zqIi-4FPfxTyuaa6bkUfYopQtKaaV09TA7KmShaFkVx9mP09VX8jFCDvs-pDECBqHfXrd27xNZ7frWdgM5H-wA9YRrIELnIBHbTbEP0Q8e0hvyCdLYDomEhljyzicXYQCy2AbvgJzse4h-B0g134VuQ74FDG445nVoIbkptfSxTcR3ZGnHARCFo1x67PaSnIdx2JJ5E72zj7MHjW0TPLl9Z9mX9yefF6f52YflajE_y52gYsjXskKJrHZQKymBOaEaaalk65Jq26wV17ySVlIBNThRaqlqXhZlU4um5LicWfb2wNuP6x3U04jRtqZHITZem2C9-TvT-a3ZhEtTFZpVFUOCF7cEMXwfIQ1mh3uBFlcKYUyGK6E0VxS7zrLn_0Avwhg7lGe4xrNRpYVEFD-gXAwp4THuhmHUTJYwB0sYtIS5sYS5wqJnf8q4K_nlAQQUB0DCVLeB-Lv3f2h_AjIFxUw</recordid><startdate>20220901</startdate><enddate>20220901</enddate><creator>Little, Kristen M.</creator><creator>Flomen, Lola</creator><creator>Hanif, Homaira</creator><creator>Anderson, Sharon M.</creator><creator>Thurman, Andrea R.</creator><creator>Clark, Meredith R.</creator><creator>Doncel, Gustavo F.</creator><general>Springer US</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>C6C</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>0-V</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7RV</scope><scope>7T2</scope><scope>7U3</scope><scope>7U9</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>88G</scope><scope>8AM</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8C1</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AEUYN</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ALSLI</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BGRYB</scope><scope>BHHNA</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>H94</scope><scope>HEHIP</scope><scope>K7.</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>KB0</scope><scope>M0O</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M2M</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>M2S</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PSYQQ</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4173-6167</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20220901</creationdate><title>HIV Pre-exposure Prophylaxis Implant Stated Preferences and Priorities: Results of a Discrete Choice Experiment Among Women and Adolescent Girls in Gauteng Province, South Africa</title><author>Little, Kristen M. ; Flomen, Lola ; Hanif, Homaira ; Anderson, Sharon M. ; Thurman, Andrea R. ; Clark, Meredith R. ; Doncel, Gustavo F.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c404t-b590891dced655e1c46f5a051b807afb627295a504edec48756d2838fd4f82893</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2022</creationdate><topic>Adolescence</topic><topic>Adolescent girls</topic><topic>Adolescents</topic><topic>Biodegradability</topic><topic>Biodegradation</topic><topic>Disease prevention</topic><topic>Girls</topic><topic>Health Psychology</topic><topic>HIV</topic><topic>Human immunodeficiency virus</topic><topic>Implants</topic><topic>Infectious Diseases</topic><topic>Insertion</topic><topic>Medicine</topic><topic>Medicine &amp; Public Health</topic><topic>Original Paper</topic><topic>Polls &amp; surveys</topic><topic>Preferences</topic><topic>Prophylaxis</topic><topic>Prostitution</topic><topic>Protection</topic><topic>Public Health</topic><topic>Sex workers</topic><topic>Sexually transmitted diseases</topic><topic>STD</topic><topic>Subgroups</topic><topic>Surveys</topic><topic>Teenagers</topic><topic>Transplants &amp; implants</topic><topic>Unwanted pregnancy</topic><topic>Women</topic><topic>Womens health</topic><topic>Young women</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Little, Kristen M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Flomen, Lola</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hanif, Homaira</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Anderson, Sharon M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Thurman, Andrea R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Clark, Meredith R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Doncel, Gustavo F.</creatorcontrib><collection>Springer Nature OA Free Journals</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Social Sciences Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Database</collection><collection>Health and Safety Science Abstracts (Full archive)</collection><collection>Social Services Abstracts</collection><collection>Virology and AIDS Abstracts</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Psychology Database (Alumni)</collection><collection>Criminal Justice Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>Public Health Database</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Sustainability</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Social Science Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Criminology Collection</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts</collection><collection>Sociology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Criminal Justice (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Criminal Justice</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Psychology</collection><collection>Research Library</collection><collection>Sociology Database (ProQuest)</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest One Psychology</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>AIDS and behavior</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Little, Kristen M.</au><au>Flomen, Lola</au><au>Hanif, Homaira</au><au>Anderson, Sharon M.</au><au>Thurman, Andrea R.</au><au>Clark, Meredith R.</au><au>Doncel, Gustavo F.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>HIV Pre-exposure Prophylaxis Implant Stated Preferences and Priorities: Results of a Discrete Choice Experiment Among Women and Adolescent Girls in Gauteng Province, South Africa</atitle><jtitle>AIDS and behavior</jtitle><stitle>AIDS Behav</stitle><addtitle>AIDS Behav</addtitle><date>2022-09-01</date><risdate>2022</risdate><volume>26</volume><issue>9</issue><spage>3099</spage><epage>3109</epage><pages>3099-3109</pages><issn>1090-7165</issn><eissn>1573-3254</eissn><abstract>For adolescent girls (AG) and young women (YW), adherence barriers may limit the effectiveness of daily oral HIV pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP). Due to its low-burden and long-lasting product attributes, PrEP implants could remove some of the critical adherence barriers of oral PrEP products for individuals at risk of HIV. To explore stated preferences for a long-acting PrEP implant, we conducted a quantitative survey and discrete choice experiment with AG (ages 15–17), YW (18–34), and female sex workers (FSW; ≥ 18) in Gauteng Province, South Africa. We completed 600 quantitative surveys across the three subgroups of women. Respondents stated preference for an implant that provided longer HIV protection (24 months versus 6 months) and required a single insertion. They stated that they preferred a biodegradable implant that could be removed within 1 month of insertion. Respondents had no preference for a particular insertion location. Overall, 78% of respondents said they would be likely (33%) or very likely (45%) to use a PrEP implant were one available, with the majority (82%) stating preference for a product that would provide dual protection against HIV and unintended pregnancies. To reduce their risk of HIV, AG, YW, and FSW in our survey reported a strong willingness to use long-acting, highly-effective, dissolvable PrEP implants.</abstract><cop>New York</cop><pub>Springer US</pub><pmid>35360893</pmid><doi>10.1007/s10461-022-03658-w</doi><tpages>11</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4173-6167</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1090-7165
ispartof AIDS and behavior, 2022-09, Vol.26 (9), p.3099-3109
issn 1090-7165
1573-3254
language eng
recordid cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_9371991
source Springer Nature - Complete Springer Journals; Sociological Abstracts
subjects Adolescence
Adolescent girls
Adolescents
Biodegradability
Biodegradation
Disease prevention
Girls
Health Psychology
HIV
Human immunodeficiency virus
Implants
Infectious Diseases
Insertion
Medicine
Medicine & Public Health
Original Paper
Polls & surveys
Preferences
Prophylaxis
Prostitution
Protection
Public Health
Sex workers
Sexually transmitted diseases
STD
Subgroups
Surveys
Teenagers
Transplants & implants
Unwanted pregnancy
Women
Womens health
Young women
title HIV Pre-exposure Prophylaxis Implant Stated Preferences and Priorities: Results of a Discrete Choice Experiment Among Women and Adolescent Girls in Gauteng Province, South Africa
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-01T00%3A25%3A07IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=HIV%20Pre-exposure%20Prophylaxis%20Implant%20Stated%20Preferences%20and%20Priorities:%20Results%20of%20a%20Discrete%20Choice%20Experiment%20Among%20Women%20and%20Adolescent%20Girls%20in%20Gauteng%20Province,%20South%20Africa&rft.jtitle=AIDS%20and%20behavior&rft.au=Little,%20Kristen%20M.&rft.date=2022-09-01&rft.volume=26&rft.issue=9&rft.spage=3099&rft.epage=3109&rft.pages=3099-3109&rft.issn=1090-7165&rft.eissn=1573-3254&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s10461-022-03658-w&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E2646726028%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2700906745&rft_id=info:pmid/35360893&rfr_iscdi=true