Understanding Flares in Patients With Generalized Pustular Psoriasis Documented in US Electronic Health Records

IMPORTANCE: Other than single-center case studies, little is known about generalized pustular psoriasis (GPP) flares. OBJECTIVE: To assess GPP flares and their treatment, as well as differences between patients with and patients without flares documented in US electronic health records (EHRs). DESIG...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Archives of dermatology (1960) 2022-10, Vol.158 (10), p.1142-1148
Hauptverfasser: Zema, Carla L, Valdecantos, Wendell C, Weiss, Jonathan, Krebs, Blake, Menter, Alan M
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 1148
container_issue 10
container_start_page 1142
container_title Archives of dermatology (1960)
container_volume 158
creator Zema, Carla L
Valdecantos, Wendell C
Weiss, Jonathan
Krebs, Blake
Menter, Alan M
description IMPORTANCE: Other than single-center case studies, little is known about generalized pustular psoriasis (GPP) flares. OBJECTIVE: To assess GPP flares and their treatment, as well as differences between patients with and patients without flares documented in US electronic health records (EHRs). DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: This retrospective cohort study included adult patients with GPP (International Statistical Classification of Diseases and Related Health Problems, Tenth Revision code L40.1) identified in Optum deidentified EHR data between July 1, 2015, and June 30, 2020. The index GPP diagnosis was the first occurrence in the EHR, with no coded history of GPP for at least 6 months prior. Flare episodes were identified using an algorithm based on diagnosis coding, care setting, type of clinician, GPP disease terms, and flare terms and attributes in the EHR. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES: Flare episodes were characterized by the frequency of occurrence per patient, the care setting in which they were identified, the type of specialist managing the episode, associated symptoms, and the type of treatment before, during, and after the episode. Patients were divided into groups based on whether or not they had a flare episode documented in their EHR. Comparisons were made between the groups based on demographic characteristics, comorbidity burden, health care use, and treatments. RESULTS: Of 1535 patients with GPP (1018 women [66.3%]; mean [SD] age, 53.4 [14.7] years), 271 had 513 flares documented. Compared with patients without flares, patients with flares had a 34% higher mean (SD) Charlson Comorbidity Index score (2.80 [3.11] vs 2.09 [2.52]), were almost 3 times more likely to have inpatient visits (119 of 271 [44%] vs 194 of 1264 [15%]), were more than twice as likely to have emergency department (ED) visits (126 of 271 [47%] vs 299 of 1264 [24%]), and had higher use of almost all treatment classes. Flares were identified in outpatient (271 of 513 [53%]), inpatient (186 of 513 [36%]), and ED (48 of 513 [9%]) settings. The most common treatments during flares were topical corticosteroids (35% of episodes [178 of 513]), opioids (21% [106 of 513]), other oral treatments, (eg, methotrexate, cyclosporine, tacrolimus; 13% [67 of 513]), and oral corticosteroids (11% [54 of 513]). Almost one-fourth of flare episodes (24% [122 of 513]) had no dermatologic treatment 30 days before, during, or 30 days after a flare episode. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: This cohor
doi_str_mv 10.1001/jamadermatol.2022.3142
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_9366655</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><ama_id>2794824</ama_id><sourcerecordid>2727703347</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-a438t-339687f27bbbba2ccae71dd721cd12694160168c7e453dc8bbfc28d5ab747eae3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpdUcuKFDEUDaI4Qzs_4EICbtx0T16VpDaCzBsGbNTGZUglt2fSVCVjkhL0603TQ6PeTQLnwbn3IPSOkhUlhJ7v7GQ95MnWNK4YYWzFqWAv0CmjUi8l0eLl8S_1CTorZUfaaEIEp6_RCe96objkpyhtYnMq1UYf4gO-Hm2GgkPEa1sDxFrw91Af8Q1EyHYMv8Hj9Vzq3Hh4XVIOtoSCL5Obp8ZuaJNuvuKrEVzNKQaHb8GOzeELuJR9eYNebe1Y4Oz5XaDN9dW3i9vl_eebu4tP90sruK5Lznup1ZapoY1lzllQ1HvFqPOUyV5QSdp-ToHouHd6GLaOad_ZQQkFFvgCfTz4Ps3DBN61cC2_ecphsvmXSTaYf5EYHs1D-ml6LqXsumbw4dkgpx8zlGqmUByMo42Q5mKYIkTyXnPaqO__o-7SnGNbr7GYUoTzdu0FkgeWy6mUDNtjGErMvlbzd61mX6vZ19qEbw_CBh81TPVCM8H_AHXHot4</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2727703347</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Understanding Flares in Patients With Generalized Pustular Psoriasis Documented in US Electronic Health Records</title><source>American Medical Association Journals</source><creator>Zema, Carla L ; Valdecantos, Wendell C ; Weiss, Jonathan ; Krebs, Blake ; Menter, Alan M</creator><creatorcontrib>Zema, Carla L ; Valdecantos, Wendell C ; Weiss, Jonathan ; Krebs, Blake ; Menter, Alan M</creatorcontrib><description>IMPORTANCE: Other than single-center case studies, little is known about generalized pustular psoriasis (GPP) flares. OBJECTIVE: To assess GPP flares and their treatment, as well as differences between patients with and patients without flares documented in US electronic health records (EHRs). DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: This retrospective cohort study included adult patients with GPP (International Statistical Classification of Diseases and Related Health Problems, Tenth Revision code L40.1) identified in Optum deidentified EHR data between July 1, 2015, and June 30, 2020. The index GPP diagnosis was the first occurrence in the EHR, with no coded history of GPP for at least 6 months prior. Flare episodes were identified using an algorithm based on diagnosis coding, care setting, type of clinician, GPP disease terms, and flare terms and attributes in the EHR. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES: Flare episodes were characterized by the frequency of occurrence per patient, the care setting in which they were identified, the type of specialist managing the episode, associated symptoms, and the type of treatment before, during, and after the episode. Patients were divided into groups based on whether or not they had a flare episode documented in their EHR. Comparisons were made between the groups based on demographic characteristics, comorbidity burden, health care use, and treatments. RESULTS: Of 1535 patients with GPP (1018 women [66.3%]; mean [SD] age, 53.4 [14.7] years), 271 had 513 flares documented. Compared with patients without flares, patients with flares had a 34% higher mean (SD) Charlson Comorbidity Index score (2.80 [3.11] vs 2.09 [2.52]), were almost 3 times more likely to have inpatient visits (119 of 271 [44%] vs 194 of 1264 [15%]), were more than twice as likely to have emergency department (ED) visits (126 of 271 [47%] vs 299 of 1264 [24%]), and had higher use of almost all treatment classes. Flares were identified in outpatient (271 of 513 [53%]), inpatient (186 of 513 [36%]), and ED (48 of 513 [9%]) settings. The most common treatments during flares were topical corticosteroids (35% of episodes [178 of 513]), opioids (21% [106 of 513]), other oral treatments, (eg, methotrexate, cyclosporine, tacrolimus; 13% [67 of 513]), and oral corticosteroids (11% [54 of 513]). Almost one-fourth of flare episodes (24% [122 of 513]) had no dermatologic treatment 30 days before, during, or 30 days after a flare episode. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: This cohort study suggests that there is significant unmet need for the treatment of GPP and its flares, as evidenced by patients seeking treatment in inpatient and ED settings, as well as the lack of advanced treatments.</description><identifier>ISSN: 2168-6068</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2168-6084</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1001/jamadermatol.2022.3142</identifier><identifier>PMID: 35947363</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Chicago: American Medical Association</publisher><subject>Clinical outcomes ; Comments ; Dermatology ; Electronic health records ; Online First ; Original Investigation ; Psoriasis</subject><ispartof>Archives of dermatology (1960), 2022-10, Vol.158 (10), p.1142-1148</ispartof><rights>Copyright American Medical Association Oct 2022</rights><rights>Copyright 2022 Zema CL et al. .</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-a438t-339687f27bbbba2ccae71dd721cd12694160168c7e453dc8bbfc28d5ab747eae3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-a438t-339687f27bbbba2ccae71dd721cd12694160168c7e453dc8bbfc28d5ab747eae3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://jamanetwork.com/journals/jamadermatology/articlepdf/10.1001/jamadermatol.2022.3142$$EPDF$$P50$$Gama$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://jamanetwork.com/journals/jamadermatology/fullarticle/10.1001/jamadermatol.2022.3142$$EHTML$$P50$$Gama$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>64,230,314,776,780,881,3327,27901,27902,76458,76461</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Zema, Carla L</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Valdecantos, Wendell C</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Weiss, Jonathan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Krebs, Blake</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Menter, Alan M</creatorcontrib><title>Understanding Flares in Patients With Generalized Pustular Psoriasis Documented in US Electronic Health Records</title><title>Archives of dermatology (1960)</title><description>IMPORTANCE: Other than single-center case studies, little is known about generalized pustular psoriasis (GPP) flares. OBJECTIVE: To assess GPP flares and their treatment, as well as differences between patients with and patients without flares documented in US electronic health records (EHRs). DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: This retrospective cohort study included adult patients with GPP (International Statistical Classification of Diseases and Related Health Problems, Tenth Revision code L40.1) identified in Optum deidentified EHR data between July 1, 2015, and June 30, 2020. The index GPP diagnosis was the first occurrence in the EHR, with no coded history of GPP for at least 6 months prior. Flare episodes were identified using an algorithm based on diagnosis coding, care setting, type of clinician, GPP disease terms, and flare terms and attributes in the EHR. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES: Flare episodes were characterized by the frequency of occurrence per patient, the care setting in which they were identified, the type of specialist managing the episode, associated symptoms, and the type of treatment before, during, and after the episode. Patients were divided into groups based on whether or not they had a flare episode documented in their EHR. Comparisons were made between the groups based on demographic characteristics, comorbidity burden, health care use, and treatments. RESULTS: Of 1535 patients with GPP (1018 women [66.3%]; mean [SD] age, 53.4 [14.7] years), 271 had 513 flares documented. Compared with patients without flares, patients with flares had a 34% higher mean (SD) Charlson Comorbidity Index score (2.80 [3.11] vs 2.09 [2.52]), were almost 3 times more likely to have inpatient visits (119 of 271 [44%] vs 194 of 1264 [15%]), were more than twice as likely to have emergency department (ED) visits (126 of 271 [47%] vs 299 of 1264 [24%]), and had higher use of almost all treatment classes. Flares were identified in outpatient (271 of 513 [53%]), inpatient (186 of 513 [36%]), and ED (48 of 513 [9%]) settings. The most common treatments during flares were topical corticosteroids (35% of episodes [178 of 513]), opioids (21% [106 of 513]), other oral treatments, (eg, methotrexate, cyclosporine, tacrolimus; 13% [67 of 513]), and oral corticosteroids (11% [54 of 513]). Almost one-fourth of flare episodes (24% [122 of 513]) had no dermatologic treatment 30 days before, during, or 30 days after a flare episode. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: This cohort study suggests that there is significant unmet need for the treatment of GPP and its flares, as evidenced by patients seeking treatment in inpatient and ED settings, as well as the lack of advanced treatments.</description><subject>Clinical outcomes</subject><subject>Comments</subject><subject>Dermatology</subject><subject>Electronic health records</subject><subject>Online First</subject><subject>Original Investigation</subject><subject>Psoriasis</subject><issn>2168-6068</issn><issn>2168-6084</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2022</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNpdUcuKFDEUDaI4Qzs_4EICbtx0T16VpDaCzBsGbNTGZUglt2fSVCVjkhL0603TQ6PeTQLnwbn3IPSOkhUlhJ7v7GQ95MnWNK4YYWzFqWAv0CmjUi8l0eLl8S_1CTorZUfaaEIEp6_RCe96objkpyhtYnMq1UYf4gO-Hm2GgkPEa1sDxFrw91Af8Q1EyHYMv8Hj9Vzq3Hh4XVIOtoSCL5Obp8ZuaJNuvuKrEVzNKQaHb8GOzeELuJR9eYNebe1Y4Oz5XaDN9dW3i9vl_eebu4tP90sruK5Lznup1ZapoY1lzllQ1HvFqPOUyV5QSdp-ToHouHd6GLaOad_ZQQkFFvgCfTz4Ps3DBN61cC2_ecphsvmXSTaYf5EYHs1D-ml6LqXsumbw4dkgpx8zlGqmUByMo42Q5mKYIkTyXnPaqO__o-7SnGNbr7GYUoTzdu0FkgeWy6mUDNtjGErMvlbzd61mX6vZ19qEbw_CBh81TPVCM8H_AHXHot4</recordid><startdate>20221001</startdate><enddate>20221001</enddate><creator>Zema, Carla L</creator><creator>Valdecantos, Wendell C</creator><creator>Weiss, Jonathan</creator><creator>Krebs, Blake</creator><creator>Menter, Alan M</creator><general>American Medical Association</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20221001</creationdate><title>Understanding Flares in Patients With Generalized Pustular Psoriasis Documented in US Electronic Health Records</title><author>Zema, Carla L ; Valdecantos, Wendell C ; Weiss, Jonathan ; Krebs, Blake ; Menter, Alan M</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-a438t-339687f27bbbba2ccae71dd721cd12694160168c7e453dc8bbfc28d5ab747eae3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2022</creationdate><topic>Clinical outcomes</topic><topic>Comments</topic><topic>Dermatology</topic><topic>Electronic health records</topic><topic>Online First</topic><topic>Original Investigation</topic><topic>Psoriasis</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Zema, Carla L</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Valdecantos, Wendell C</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Weiss, Jonathan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Krebs, Blake</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Menter, Alan M</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>Archives of dermatology (1960)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Zema, Carla L</au><au>Valdecantos, Wendell C</au><au>Weiss, Jonathan</au><au>Krebs, Blake</au><au>Menter, Alan M</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Understanding Flares in Patients With Generalized Pustular Psoriasis Documented in US Electronic Health Records</atitle><jtitle>Archives of dermatology (1960)</jtitle><date>2022-10-01</date><risdate>2022</risdate><volume>158</volume><issue>10</issue><spage>1142</spage><epage>1148</epage><pages>1142-1148</pages><issn>2168-6068</issn><eissn>2168-6084</eissn><abstract>IMPORTANCE: Other than single-center case studies, little is known about generalized pustular psoriasis (GPP) flares. OBJECTIVE: To assess GPP flares and their treatment, as well as differences between patients with and patients without flares documented in US electronic health records (EHRs). DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: This retrospective cohort study included adult patients with GPP (International Statistical Classification of Diseases and Related Health Problems, Tenth Revision code L40.1) identified in Optum deidentified EHR data between July 1, 2015, and June 30, 2020. The index GPP diagnosis was the first occurrence in the EHR, with no coded history of GPP for at least 6 months prior. Flare episodes were identified using an algorithm based on diagnosis coding, care setting, type of clinician, GPP disease terms, and flare terms and attributes in the EHR. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES: Flare episodes were characterized by the frequency of occurrence per patient, the care setting in which they were identified, the type of specialist managing the episode, associated symptoms, and the type of treatment before, during, and after the episode. Patients were divided into groups based on whether or not they had a flare episode documented in their EHR. Comparisons were made between the groups based on demographic characteristics, comorbidity burden, health care use, and treatments. RESULTS: Of 1535 patients with GPP (1018 women [66.3%]; mean [SD] age, 53.4 [14.7] years), 271 had 513 flares documented. Compared with patients without flares, patients with flares had a 34% higher mean (SD) Charlson Comorbidity Index score (2.80 [3.11] vs 2.09 [2.52]), were almost 3 times more likely to have inpatient visits (119 of 271 [44%] vs 194 of 1264 [15%]), were more than twice as likely to have emergency department (ED) visits (126 of 271 [47%] vs 299 of 1264 [24%]), and had higher use of almost all treatment classes. Flares were identified in outpatient (271 of 513 [53%]), inpatient (186 of 513 [36%]), and ED (48 of 513 [9%]) settings. The most common treatments during flares were topical corticosteroids (35% of episodes [178 of 513]), opioids (21% [106 of 513]), other oral treatments, (eg, methotrexate, cyclosporine, tacrolimus; 13% [67 of 513]), and oral corticosteroids (11% [54 of 513]). Almost one-fourth of flare episodes (24% [122 of 513]) had no dermatologic treatment 30 days before, during, or 30 days after a flare episode. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: This cohort study suggests that there is significant unmet need for the treatment of GPP and its flares, as evidenced by patients seeking treatment in inpatient and ED settings, as well as the lack of advanced treatments.</abstract><cop>Chicago</cop><pub>American Medical Association</pub><pmid>35947363</pmid><doi>10.1001/jamadermatol.2022.3142</doi><tpages>7</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 2168-6068
ispartof Archives of dermatology (1960), 2022-10, Vol.158 (10), p.1142-1148
issn 2168-6068
2168-6084
language eng
recordid cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_9366655
source American Medical Association Journals
subjects Clinical outcomes
Comments
Dermatology
Electronic health records
Online First
Original Investigation
Psoriasis
title Understanding Flares in Patients With Generalized Pustular Psoriasis Documented in US Electronic Health Records
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-13T08%3A48%3A24IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Understanding%20Flares%20in%20Patients%20With%20Generalized%20Pustular%20Psoriasis%20Documented%20in%20US%20Electronic%20Health%20Records&rft.jtitle=Archives%20of%20dermatology%20(1960)&rft.au=Zema,%20Carla%20L&rft.date=2022-10-01&rft.volume=158&rft.issue=10&rft.spage=1142&rft.epage=1148&rft.pages=1142-1148&rft.issn=2168-6068&rft.eissn=2168-6084&rft_id=info:doi/10.1001/jamadermatol.2022.3142&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E2727703347%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2727703347&rft_id=info:pmid/35947363&rft_ama_id=2794824&rfr_iscdi=true