Shared decision-making for the treatment of proximal femoral fractures in frail institutionalised older patients: healthcare providers’ perceived barriers and facilitators

Abstract Introduction Proximal femoral fractures are common in frail institutionalised older patients. No convincing evidence exists regarding the optimal treatment strategy for those with a limited pre-fracture life expectancy, underpinning the importance of shared decision-making (SDM). This study...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Age and ageing 2022-08, Vol.51 (8)
Hauptverfasser: Spronk, Inge, Loggers, Sverre A I, Joosse, Pieter, Willems, Hanna C, Van Balen, Romke, Gosens, Taco, Ponsen, Kornelis J, Steens, Jeroen, van de Ree, C L P (Marc), Zuurmond, Rutger G, Verhofstad, Michael H J, Van Lieshout, Esther M M, Polinder, Suzanne
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Abstract Introduction Proximal femoral fractures are common in frail institutionalised older patients. No convincing evidence exists regarding the optimal treatment strategy for those with a limited pre-fracture life expectancy, underpinning the importance of shared decision-making (SDM). This study investigated healthcare providers’ barriers to and facilitators of the implementation of SDM. Methods Dutch healthcare providers completed an adapted version of the Measurement Instrument for Determinants of Innovations questionnaire to identify barriers and facilitators. If ≥20% of participants responded with ‘totally disagree/disagree’, items were considered barriers and, if ≥80% responded with ‘agree/totally agree’, items were considered facilitators. Results A total of 271 healthcare providers participated. Five barriers and 23 facilitators were identified. Barriers included the time required to both prepare for and hold SDM conversations, in addition to the reflective period required to allow patients/relatives to make their final decision, and the number of parties required to ensure optimal SDM. Facilitators were related to patients’ values, wishes and satisfaction, the importance of SDM for patients/relatives and the fact that SDM is not considered complex by healthcare providers, is considered to be part of routine care and is believed to be associated with positive patient outcomes. Conclusion Awareness of identified facilitators and barriers is an important step in expanding the use of SDM. Implementation strategies should be aimed at managing time constraints. High-quality evidence on outcomes of non-operative and operative management can enhance implementation of SDM to address current concerns around the outcomes.
ISSN:0002-0729
1468-2834
DOI:10.1093/ageing/afac174