Global prevalence and subgroup analyses of coronavirus disease (COVID‐19) associated Candida auris infections (CACa): A systematic review and meta‐analysis

Background Increased hospitalisation rates in the Coronavirus disease 19 (COVID‐19) era lead to a new wave of hospital‐acquired infections such as emerging multidrug‐resistant Candida auris. We aimed to evaluate and estimate the global prevalence of coronavirus‐associated C. auris infection (CACa)....

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Mycoses 2022-07, Vol.65 (7), p.683-703
Hauptverfasser: Vaseghi, Narges, Sharifisooraki, Joobin, Khodadadi, Hossein, Nami, Sanam, Safari, Fatemeh, Ahangarkani, Fatemeh, Meis, Jacques F., Badali, Hamid, Morovati, Hamid
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 703
container_issue 7
container_start_page 683
container_title Mycoses
container_volume 65
creator Vaseghi, Narges
Sharifisooraki, Joobin
Khodadadi, Hossein
Nami, Sanam
Safari, Fatemeh
Ahangarkani, Fatemeh
Meis, Jacques F.
Badali, Hamid
Morovati, Hamid
description Background Increased hospitalisation rates in the Coronavirus disease 19 (COVID‐19) era lead to a new wave of hospital‐acquired infections such as emerging multidrug‐resistant Candida auris. We aimed to evaluate and estimate the global prevalence of coronavirus‐associated C. auris infection (CACa). Methods We searched related databases between December 2019 and April 2022 for studies that reported data about CACa. Meta‐analysis was performed using MedCalc software version 20.104 according to the DerSimonian and Laird method applying the random‐effects model. We evaluated heterogeneity using the χ2‐based Q statistic (significant for p‐value 75% indicative of ‘notable’ heterogeneity). Moreover, if possible, an odds ratio (OR) analysis was performed for eligible data. Results Our meta‐analysis includes ten eligible studies, including 1942 patients hospitalised with COVID‐19; 129 were C. auris cases. The overall pooled prevalence of CACa was estimated at 5.7%. The mortality rate of CACa was estimated at 67.849%. Hypertension was the most prevalent comorbidity (59.374%), followed by diabetes mellitus (52.898%) and cardiovascular diseases (31.392%). Men with a prevalence rate of 80.012% were 3.27 (OR) times more prone to getting infected by C. auris. Conclusion We concluded that the prevalence of C. auris infections decreased during the COVID‐19 pandemic and the prevalence gradient changed from Asia to America. Unfortunately, there are many descriptive studies with duplicate content in the field of epidemiology of C. auris infections which are increasing every day. We suggest further non‐descriptive studies to accurately establish the cause‐and‐effect relationships between C. auris and COVID‐19 infections.
doi_str_mv 10.1111/myc.13471
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_9347948</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2664785575</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4431-7992d515d4cfdfead4d4ed78e87dfdc6679f02fd9ee5f8604a408c801800f3b13</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kcFu1DAQhiMEokvhwAsgS1y6h7R24sQxB6RVKKVSUS-AxMny2uPiKom3nmSrvfEIfQPejSfBbUoFSMzFsvz5m7H_LHvJ6CFLddTvzCEruWCPsgXjpcxpRcXjbEFlWeaCU7GXPUO8pJQJWdRPs72ySiULtsh-nHRhrTuyibDVHQwGiB4swWl9EcO0SRvd7RCQBEdMiGHQWx8nJNYjaARy0J5_OX338_sNk0uiEYPxegRL2mTxVhM9RY_EDw7M6MOA6cKq1cs3ZEVwhyP0evSGpOYeru869zDqpJv7enyePXG6Q3hxv-5nn98ff2o_5GfnJ6ft6iw3nJcsF1IWtmKV5cZZB9pyy8GKBhphnTV1LaSjhbMSoHJNTbnmtDENZQ2lrlyzcj97O3s307oHa2AYo-7UJvpex50K2qu_Twb_TV2ErZLp3yVvkuDgXhDD1QQ4qt6jga7TA4QJVVHXXDRVJaqEvv4HvQxTTA--pUTDBCsFTdRypkwMiBHcwzCMqtvYVYpd3cWe2Fd_Tv9A_s45AUczcO072P3fpD5-bWflL88iu4E</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2678171370</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Global prevalence and subgroup analyses of coronavirus disease (COVID‐19) associated Candida auris infections (CACa): A systematic review and meta‐analysis</title><source>Wiley Journals</source><creator>Vaseghi, Narges ; Sharifisooraki, Joobin ; Khodadadi, Hossein ; Nami, Sanam ; Safari, Fatemeh ; Ahangarkani, Fatemeh ; Meis, Jacques F. ; Badali, Hamid ; Morovati, Hamid</creator><creatorcontrib>Vaseghi, Narges ; Sharifisooraki, Joobin ; Khodadadi, Hossein ; Nami, Sanam ; Safari, Fatemeh ; Ahangarkani, Fatemeh ; Meis, Jacques F. ; Badali, Hamid ; Morovati, Hamid</creatorcontrib><description>Background Increased hospitalisation rates in the Coronavirus disease 19 (COVID‐19) era lead to a new wave of hospital‐acquired infections such as emerging multidrug‐resistant Candida auris. We aimed to evaluate and estimate the global prevalence of coronavirus‐associated C. auris infection (CACa). Methods We searched related databases between December 2019 and April 2022 for studies that reported data about CACa. Meta‐analysis was performed using MedCalc software version 20.104 according to the DerSimonian and Laird method applying the random‐effects model. We evaluated heterogeneity using the χ2‐based Q statistic (significant for p‐value &lt; .1) and the I2 statistic (&gt;75% indicative of ‘notable’ heterogeneity). Moreover, if possible, an odds ratio (OR) analysis was performed for eligible data. Results Our meta‐analysis includes ten eligible studies, including 1942 patients hospitalised with COVID‐19; 129 were C. auris cases. The overall pooled prevalence of CACa was estimated at 5.7%. The mortality rate of CACa was estimated at 67.849%. Hypertension was the most prevalent comorbidity (59.374%), followed by diabetes mellitus (52.898%) and cardiovascular diseases (31.392%). Men with a prevalence rate of 80.012% were 3.27 (OR) times more prone to getting infected by C. auris. Conclusion We concluded that the prevalence of C. auris infections decreased during the COVID‐19 pandemic and the prevalence gradient changed from Asia to America. Unfortunately, there are many descriptive studies with duplicate content in the field of epidemiology of C. auris infections which are increasing every day. We suggest further non‐descriptive studies to accurately establish the cause‐and‐effect relationships between C. auris and COVID‐19 infections.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0933-7407</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1439-0507</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1111/myc.13471</identifier><identifier>PMID: 35555921</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Germany: Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</publisher><subject>Candida auris ; Cardiovascular diseases ; coronavirus disease 19 (COVID‐19) ; Coronaviruses ; COVID associated infections ; COVID-19 ; Diabetes mellitus ; Epidemiology ; Infections ; Meta-analysis ; prevalence ; Review ; risk factors ; SARS‐CoV‐2</subject><ispartof>Mycoses, 2022-07, Vol.65 (7), p.683-703</ispartof><rights>2022 Wiley‐VCH GmbH.</rights><rights>This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4431-7992d515d4cfdfead4d4ed78e87dfdc6679f02fd9ee5f8604a408c801800f3b13</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4431-7992d515d4cfdfead4d4ed78e87dfdc6679f02fd9ee5f8604a408c801800f3b13</cites><orcidid>0000-0003-3253-6080 ; 0000-0001-9509-5708 ; 0000-0001-9187-5555 ; 0000-0001-9507-8764 ; 0000-0002-3629-7446 ; 0000-0002-3569-0035 ; 0000-0002-6010-8414</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1111%2Fmyc.13471$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111%2Fmyc.13471$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,780,784,885,1417,27924,27925,45574,45575</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35555921$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Vaseghi, Narges</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sharifisooraki, Joobin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Khodadadi, Hossein</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nami, Sanam</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Safari, Fatemeh</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ahangarkani, Fatemeh</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Meis, Jacques F.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Badali, Hamid</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Morovati, Hamid</creatorcontrib><title>Global prevalence and subgroup analyses of coronavirus disease (COVID‐19) associated Candida auris infections (CACa): A systematic review and meta‐analysis</title><title>Mycoses</title><addtitle>Mycoses</addtitle><description>Background Increased hospitalisation rates in the Coronavirus disease 19 (COVID‐19) era lead to a new wave of hospital‐acquired infections such as emerging multidrug‐resistant Candida auris. We aimed to evaluate and estimate the global prevalence of coronavirus‐associated C. auris infection (CACa). Methods We searched related databases between December 2019 and April 2022 for studies that reported data about CACa. Meta‐analysis was performed using MedCalc software version 20.104 according to the DerSimonian and Laird method applying the random‐effects model. We evaluated heterogeneity using the χ2‐based Q statistic (significant for p‐value &lt; .1) and the I2 statistic (&gt;75% indicative of ‘notable’ heterogeneity). Moreover, if possible, an odds ratio (OR) analysis was performed for eligible data. Results Our meta‐analysis includes ten eligible studies, including 1942 patients hospitalised with COVID‐19; 129 were C. auris cases. The overall pooled prevalence of CACa was estimated at 5.7%. The mortality rate of CACa was estimated at 67.849%. Hypertension was the most prevalent comorbidity (59.374%), followed by diabetes mellitus (52.898%) and cardiovascular diseases (31.392%). Men with a prevalence rate of 80.012% were 3.27 (OR) times more prone to getting infected by C. auris. Conclusion We concluded that the prevalence of C. auris infections decreased during the COVID‐19 pandemic and the prevalence gradient changed from Asia to America. Unfortunately, there are many descriptive studies with duplicate content in the field of epidemiology of C. auris infections which are increasing every day. We suggest further non‐descriptive studies to accurately establish the cause‐and‐effect relationships between C. auris and COVID‐19 infections.</description><subject>Candida auris</subject><subject>Cardiovascular diseases</subject><subject>coronavirus disease 19 (COVID‐19)</subject><subject>Coronaviruses</subject><subject>COVID associated infections</subject><subject>COVID-19</subject><subject>Diabetes mellitus</subject><subject>Epidemiology</subject><subject>Infections</subject><subject>Meta-analysis</subject><subject>prevalence</subject><subject>Review</subject><subject>risk factors</subject><subject>SARS‐CoV‐2</subject><issn>0933-7407</issn><issn>1439-0507</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2022</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp1kcFu1DAQhiMEokvhwAsgS1y6h7R24sQxB6RVKKVSUS-AxMny2uPiKom3nmSrvfEIfQPejSfBbUoFSMzFsvz5m7H_LHvJ6CFLddTvzCEruWCPsgXjpcxpRcXjbEFlWeaCU7GXPUO8pJQJWdRPs72ySiULtsh-nHRhrTuyibDVHQwGiB4swWl9EcO0SRvd7RCQBEdMiGHQWx8nJNYjaARy0J5_OX338_sNk0uiEYPxegRL2mTxVhM9RY_EDw7M6MOA6cKq1cs3ZEVwhyP0evSGpOYeru869zDqpJv7enyePXG6Q3hxv-5nn98ff2o_5GfnJ6ft6iw3nJcsF1IWtmKV5cZZB9pyy8GKBhphnTV1LaSjhbMSoHJNTbnmtDENZQ2lrlyzcj97O3s307oHa2AYo-7UJvpex50K2qu_Twb_TV2ErZLp3yVvkuDgXhDD1QQ4qt6jga7TA4QJVVHXXDRVJaqEvv4HvQxTTA--pUTDBCsFTdRypkwMiBHcwzCMqtvYVYpd3cWe2Fd_Tv9A_s45AUczcO072P3fpD5-bWflL88iu4E</recordid><startdate>202207</startdate><enddate>202207</enddate><creator>Vaseghi, Narges</creator><creator>Sharifisooraki, Joobin</creator><creator>Khodadadi, Hossein</creator><creator>Nami, Sanam</creator><creator>Safari, Fatemeh</creator><creator>Ahangarkani, Fatemeh</creator><creator>Meis, Jacques F.</creator><creator>Badali, Hamid</creator><creator>Morovati, Hamid</creator><general>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</general><general>John Wiley and Sons Inc</general><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>M7N</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3253-6080</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9509-5708</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9187-5555</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9507-8764</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3629-7446</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3569-0035</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6010-8414</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>202207</creationdate><title>Global prevalence and subgroup analyses of coronavirus disease (COVID‐19) associated Candida auris infections (CACa): A systematic review and meta‐analysis</title><author>Vaseghi, Narges ; Sharifisooraki, Joobin ; Khodadadi, Hossein ; Nami, Sanam ; Safari, Fatemeh ; Ahangarkani, Fatemeh ; Meis, Jacques F. ; Badali, Hamid ; Morovati, Hamid</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4431-7992d515d4cfdfead4d4ed78e87dfdc6679f02fd9ee5f8604a408c801800f3b13</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2022</creationdate><topic>Candida auris</topic><topic>Cardiovascular diseases</topic><topic>coronavirus disease 19 (COVID‐19)</topic><topic>Coronaviruses</topic><topic>COVID associated infections</topic><topic>COVID-19</topic><topic>Diabetes mellitus</topic><topic>Epidemiology</topic><topic>Infections</topic><topic>Meta-analysis</topic><topic>prevalence</topic><topic>Review</topic><topic>risk factors</topic><topic>SARS‐CoV‐2</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Vaseghi, Narges</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sharifisooraki, Joobin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Khodadadi, Hossein</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nami, Sanam</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Safari, Fatemeh</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ahangarkani, Fatemeh</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Meis, Jacques F.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Badali, Hamid</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Morovati, Hamid</creatorcontrib><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Algology Mycology and Protozoology Abstracts (Microbiology C)</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>Mycoses</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Vaseghi, Narges</au><au>Sharifisooraki, Joobin</au><au>Khodadadi, Hossein</au><au>Nami, Sanam</au><au>Safari, Fatemeh</au><au>Ahangarkani, Fatemeh</au><au>Meis, Jacques F.</au><au>Badali, Hamid</au><au>Morovati, Hamid</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Global prevalence and subgroup analyses of coronavirus disease (COVID‐19) associated Candida auris infections (CACa): A systematic review and meta‐analysis</atitle><jtitle>Mycoses</jtitle><addtitle>Mycoses</addtitle><date>2022-07</date><risdate>2022</risdate><volume>65</volume><issue>7</issue><spage>683</spage><epage>703</epage><pages>683-703</pages><issn>0933-7407</issn><eissn>1439-0507</eissn><abstract>Background Increased hospitalisation rates in the Coronavirus disease 19 (COVID‐19) era lead to a new wave of hospital‐acquired infections such as emerging multidrug‐resistant Candida auris. We aimed to evaluate and estimate the global prevalence of coronavirus‐associated C. auris infection (CACa). Methods We searched related databases between December 2019 and April 2022 for studies that reported data about CACa. Meta‐analysis was performed using MedCalc software version 20.104 according to the DerSimonian and Laird method applying the random‐effects model. We evaluated heterogeneity using the χ2‐based Q statistic (significant for p‐value &lt; .1) and the I2 statistic (&gt;75% indicative of ‘notable’ heterogeneity). Moreover, if possible, an odds ratio (OR) analysis was performed for eligible data. Results Our meta‐analysis includes ten eligible studies, including 1942 patients hospitalised with COVID‐19; 129 were C. auris cases. The overall pooled prevalence of CACa was estimated at 5.7%. The mortality rate of CACa was estimated at 67.849%. Hypertension was the most prevalent comorbidity (59.374%), followed by diabetes mellitus (52.898%) and cardiovascular diseases (31.392%). Men with a prevalence rate of 80.012% were 3.27 (OR) times more prone to getting infected by C. auris. Conclusion We concluded that the prevalence of C. auris infections decreased during the COVID‐19 pandemic and the prevalence gradient changed from Asia to America. Unfortunately, there are many descriptive studies with duplicate content in the field of epidemiology of C. auris infections which are increasing every day. We suggest further non‐descriptive studies to accurately establish the cause‐and‐effect relationships between C. auris and COVID‐19 infections.</abstract><cop>Germany</cop><pub>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</pub><pmid>35555921</pmid><doi>10.1111/myc.13471</doi><tpages>21</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3253-6080</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9509-5708</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9187-5555</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9507-8764</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3629-7446</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3569-0035</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6010-8414</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0933-7407
ispartof Mycoses, 2022-07, Vol.65 (7), p.683-703
issn 0933-7407
1439-0507
language eng
recordid cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_9347948
source Wiley Journals
subjects Candida auris
Cardiovascular diseases
coronavirus disease 19 (COVID‐19)
Coronaviruses
COVID associated infections
COVID-19
Diabetes mellitus
Epidemiology
Infections
Meta-analysis
prevalence
Review
risk factors
SARS‐CoV‐2
title Global prevalence and subgroup analyses of coronavirus disease (COVID‐19) associated Candida auris infections (CACa): A systematic review and meta‐analysis
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-29T07%3A03%3A09IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Global%20prevalence%20and%20subgroup%20analyses%20of%20coronavirus%20disease%20(COVID%E2%80%9019)%20associated%20Candida%20auris%20infections%20(CACa):%20A%20systematic%20review%20and%20meta%E2%80%90analysis&rft.jtitle=Mycoses&rft.au=Vaseghi,%20Narges&rft.date=2022-07&rft.volume=65&rft.issue=7&rft.spage=683&rft.epage=703&rft.pages=683-703&rft.issn=0933-7407&rft.eissn=1439-0507&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111/myc.13471&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E2664785575%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2678171370&rft_id=info:pmid/35555921&rfr_iscdi=true