Global prevalence and subgroup analyses of coronavirus disease (COVID‐19) associated Candida auris infections (CACa): A systematic review and meta‐analysis
Background Increased hospitalisation rates in the Coronavirus disease 19 (COVID‐19) era lead to a new wave of hospital‐acquired infections such as emerging multidrug‐resistant Candida auris. We aimed to evaluate and estimate the global prevalence of coronavirus‐associated C. auris infection (CACa)....
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Mycoses 2022-07, Vol.65 (7), p.683-703 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 703 |
---|---|
container_issue | 7 |
container_start_page | 683 |
container_title | Mycoses |
container_volume | 65 |
creator | Vaseghi, Narges Sharifisooraki, Joobin Khodadadi, Hossein Nami, Sanam Safari, Fatemeh Ahangarkani, Fatemeh Meis, Jacques F. Badali, Hamid Morovati, Hamid |
description | Background
Increased hospitalisation rates in the Coronavirus disease 19 (COVID‐19) era lead to a new wave of hospital‐acquired infections such as emerging multidrug‐resistant Candida auris. We aimed to evaluate and estimate the global prevalence of coronavirus‐associated C. auris infection (CACa).
Methods
We searched related databases between December 2019 and April 2022 for studies that reported data about CACa. Meta‐analysis was performed using MedCalc software version 20.104 according to the DerSimonian and Laird method applying the random‐effects model. We evaluated heterogeneity using the χ2‐based Q statistic (significant for p‐value 75% indicative of ‘notable’ heterogeneity). Moreover, if possible, an odds ratio (OR) analysis was performed for eligible data.
Results
Our meta‐analysis includes ten eligible studies, including 1942 patients hospitalised with COVID‐19; 129 were C. auris cases. The overall pooled prevalence of CACa was estimated at 5.7%. The mortality rate of CACa was estimated at 67.849%. Hypertension was the most prevalent comorbidity (59.374%), followed by diabetes mellitus (52.898%) and cardiovascular diseases (31.392%). Men with a prevalence rate of 80.012% were 3.27 (OR) times more prone to getting infected by C. auris.
Conclusion
We concluded that the prevalence of C. auris infections decreased during the COVID‐19 pandemic and the prevalence gradient changed from Asia to America. Unfortunately, there are many descriptive studies with duplicate content in the field of epidemiology of C. auris infections which are increasing every day. We suggest further non‐descriptive studies to accurately establish the cause‐and‐effect relationships between C. auris and COVID‐19 infections. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1111/myc.13471 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_9347948</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2664785575</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4431-7992d515d4cfdfead4d4ed78e87dfdc6679f02fd9ee5f8604a408c801800f3b13</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kcFu1DAQhiMEokvhwAsgS1y6h7R24sQxB6RVKKVSUS-AxMny2uPiKom3nmSrvfEIfQPejSfBbUoFSMzFsvz5m7H_LHvJ6CFLddTvzCEruWCPsgXjpcxpRcXjbEFlWeaCU7GXPUO8pJQJWdRPs72ySiULtsh-nHRhrTuyibDVHQwGiB4swWl9EcO0SRvd7RCQBEdMiGHQWx8nJNYjaARy0J5_OX338_sNk0uiEYPxegRL2mTxVhM9RY_EDw7M6MOA6cKq1cs3ZEVwhyP0evSGpOYeru869zDqpJv7enyePXG6Q3hxv-5nn98ff2o_5GfnJ6ft6iw3nJcsF1IWtmKV5cZZB9pyy8GKBhphnTV1LaSjhbMSoHJNTbnmtDENZQ2lrlyzcj97O3s307oHa2AYo-7UJvpex50K2qu_Twb_TV2ErZLp3yVvkuDgXhDD1QQ4qt6jga7TA4QJVVHXXDRVJaqEvv4HvQxTTA--pUTDBCsFTdRypkwMiBHcwzCMqtvYVYpd3cWe2Fd_Tv9A_s45AUczcO072P3fpD5-bWflL88iu4E</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2678171370</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Global prevalence and subgroup analyses of coronavirus disease (COVID‐19) associated Candida auris infections (CACa): A systematic review and meta‐analysis</title><source>Wiley Journals</source><creator>Vaseghi, Narges ; Sharifisooraki, Joobin ; Khodadadi, Hossein ; Nami, Sanam ; Safari, Fatemeh ; Ahangarkani, Fatemeh ; Meis, Jacques F. ; Badali, Hamid ; Morovati, Hamid</creator><creatorcontrib>Vaseghi, Narges ; Sharifisooraki, Joobin ; Khodadadi, Hossein ; Nami, Sanam ; Safari, Fatemeh ; Ahangarkani, Fatemeh ; Meis, Jacques F. ; Badali, Hamid ; Morovati, Hamid</creatorcontrib><description>Background
Increased hospitalisation rates in the Coronavirus disease 19 (COVID‐19) era lead to a new wave of hospital‐acquired infections such as emerging multidrug‐resistant Candida auris. We aimed to evaluate and estimate the global prevalence of coronavirus‐associated C. auris infection (CACa).
Methods
We searched related databases between December 2019 and April 2022 for studies that reported data about CACa. Meta‐analysis was performed using MedCalc software version 20.104 according to the DerSimonian and Laird method applying the random‐effects model. We evaluated heterogeneity using the χ2‐based Q statistic (significant for p‐value < .1) and the I2 statistic (>75% indicative of ‘notable’ heterogeneity). Moreover, if possible, an odds ratio (OR) analysis was performed for eligible data.
Results
Our meta‐analysis includes ten eligible studies, including 1942 patients hospitalised with COVID‐19; 129 were C. auris cases. The overall pooled prevalence of CACa was estimated at 5.7%. The mortality rate of CACa was estimated at 67.849%. Hypertension was the most prevalent comorbidity (59.374%), followed by diabetes mellitus (52.898%) and cardiovascular diseases (31.392%). Men with a prevalence rate of 80.012% were 3.27 (OR) times more prone to getting infected by C. auris.
Conclusion
We concluded that the prevalence of C. auris infections decreased during the COVID‐19 pandemic and the prevalence gradient changed from Asia to America. Unfortunately, there are many descriptive studies with duplicate content in the field of epidemiology of C. auris infections which are increasing every day. We suggest further non‐descriptive studies to accurately establish the cause‐and‐effect relationships between C. auris and COVID‐19 infections.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0933-7407</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1439-0507</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1111/myc.13471</identifier><identifier>PMID: 35555921</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Germany: Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</publisher><subject>Candida auris ; Cardiovascular diseases ; coronavirus disease 19 (COVID‐19) ; Coronaviruses ; COVID associated infections ; COVID-19 ; Diabetes mellitus ; Epidemiology ; Infections ; Meta-analysis ; prevalence ; Review ; risk factors ; SARS‐CoV‐2</subject><ispartof>Mycoses, 2022-07, Vol.65 (7), p.683-703</ispartof><rights>2022 Wiley‐VCH GmbH.</rights><rights>This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4431-7992d515d4cfdfead4d4ed78e87dfdc6679f02fd9ee5f8604a408c801800f3b13</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4431-7992d515d4cfdfead4d4ed78e87dfdc6679f02fd9ee5f8604a408c801800f3b13</cites><orcidid>0000-0003-3253-6080 ; 0000-0001-9509-5708 ; 0000-0001-9187-5555 ; 0000-0001-9507-8764 ; 0000-0002-3629-7446 ; 0000-0002-3569-0035 ; 0000-0002-6010-8414</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1111%2Fmyc.13471$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111%2Fmyc.13471$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,780,784,885,1417,27924,27925,45574,45575</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35555921$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Vaseghi, Narges</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sharifisooraki, Joobin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Khodadadi, Hossein</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nami, Sanam</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Safari, Fatemeh</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ahangarkani, Fatemeh</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Meis, Jacques F.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Badali, Hamid</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Morovati, Hamid</creatorcontrib><title>Global prevalence and subgroup analyses of coronavirus disease (COVID‐19) associated Candida auris infections (CACa): A systematic review and meta‐analysis</title><title>Mycoses</title><addtitle>Mycoses</addtitle><description>Background
Increased hospitalisation rates in the Coronavirus disease 19 (COVID‐19) era lead to a new wave of hospital‐acquired infections such as emerging multidrug‐resistant Candida auris. We aimed to evaluate and estimate the global prevalence of coronavirus‐associated C. auris infection (CACa).
Methods
We searched related databases between December 2019 and April 2022 for studies that reported data about CACa. Meta‐analysis was performed using MedCalc software version 20.104 according to the DerSimonian and Laird method applying the random‐effects model. We evaluated heterogeneity using the χ2‐based Q statistic (significant for p‐value < .1) and the I2 statistic (>75% indicative of ‘notable’ heterogeneity). Moreover, if possible, an odds ratio (OR) analysis was performed for eligible data.
Results
Our meta‐analysis includes ten eligible studies, including 1942 patients hospitalised with COVID‐19; 129 were C. auris cases. The overall pooled prevalence of CACa was estimated at 5.7%. The mortality rate of CACa was estimated at 67.849%. Hypertension was the most prevalent comorbidity (59.374%), followed by diabetes mellitus (52.898%) and cardiovascular diseases (31.392%). Men with a prevalence rate of 80.012% were 3.27 (OR) times more prone to getting infected by C. auris.
Conclusion
We concluded that the prevalence of C. auris infections decreased during the COVID‐19 pandemic and the prevalence gradient changed from Asia to America. Unfortunately, there are many descriptive studies with duplicate content in the field of epidemiology of C. auris infections which are increasing every day. We suggest further non‐descriptive studies to accurately establish the cause‐and‐effect relationships between C. auris and COVID‐19 infections.</description><subject>Candida auris</subject><subject>Cardiovascular diseases</subject><subject>coronavirus disease 19 (COVID‐19)</subject><subject>Coronaviruses</subject><subject>COVID associated infections</subject><subject>COVID-19</subject><subject>Diabetes mellitus</subject><subject>Epidemiology</subject><subject>Infections</subject><subject>Meta-analysis</subject><subject>prevalence</subject><subject>Review</subject><subject>risk factors</subject><subject>SARS‐CoV‐2</subject><issn>0933-7407</issn><issn>1439-0507</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2022</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp1kcFu1DAQhiMEokvhwAsgS1y6h7R24sQxB6RVKKVSUS-AxMny2uPiKom3nmSrvfEIfQPejSfBbUoFSMzFsvz5m7H_LHvJ6CFLddTvzCEruWCPsgXjpcxpRcXjbEFlWeaCU7GXPUO8pJQJWdRPs72ySiULtsh-nHRhrTuyibDVHQwGiB4swWl9EcO0SRvd7RCQBEdMiGHQWx8nJNYjaARy0J5_OX338_sNk0uiEYPxegRL2mTxVhM9RY_EDw7M6MOA6cKq1cs3ZEVwhyP0evSGpOYeru869zDqpJv7enyePXG6Q3hxv-5nn98ff2o_5GfnJ6ft6iw3nJcsF1IWtmKV5cZZB9pyy8GKBhphnTV1LaSjhbMSoHJNTbnmtDENZQ2lrlyzcj97O3s307oHa2AYo-7UJvpex50K2qu_Twb_TV2ErZLp3yVvkuDgXhDD1QQ4qt6jga7TA4QJVVHXXDRVJaqEvv4HvQxTTA--pUTDBCsFTdRypkwMiBHcwzCMqtvYVYpd3cWe2Fd_Tv9A_s45AUczcO072P3fpD5-bWflL88iu4E</recordid><startdate>202207</startdate><enddate>202207</enddate><creator>Vaseghi, Narges</creator><creator>Sharifisooraki, Joobin</creator><creator>Khodadadi, Hossein</creator><creator>Nami, Sanam</creator><creator>Safari, Fatemeh</creator><creator>Ahangarkani, Fatemeh</creator><creator>Meis, Jacques F.</creator><creator>Badali, Hamid</creator><creator>Morovati, Hamid</creator><general>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</general><general>John Wiley and Sons Inc</general><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>M7N</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3253-6080</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9509-5708</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9187-5555</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9507-8764</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3629-7446</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3569-0035</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6010-8414</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>202207</creationdate><title>Global prevalence and subgroup analyses of coronavirus disease (COVID‐19) associated Candida auris infections (CACa): A systematic review and meta‐analysis</title><author>Vaseghi, Narges ; Sharifisooraki, Joobin ; Khodadadi, Hossein ; Nami, Sanam ; Safari, Fatemeh ; Ahangarkani, Fatemeh ; Meis, Jacques F. ; Badali, Hamid ; Morovati, Hamid</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4431-7992d515d4cfdfead4d4ed78e87dfdc6679f02fd9ee5f8604a408c801800f3b13</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2022</creationdate><topic>Candida auris</topic><topic>Cardiovascular diseases</topic><topic>coronavirus disease 19 (COVID‐19)</topic><topic>Coronaviruses</topic><topic>COVID associated infections</topic><topic>COVID-19</topic><topic>Diabetes mellitus</topic><topic>Epidemiology</topic><topic>Infections</topic><topic>Meta-analysis</topic><topic>prevalence</topic><topic>Review</topic><topic>risk factors</topic><topic>SARS‐CoV‐2</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Vaseghi, Narges</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sharifisooraki, Joobin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Khodadadi, Hossein</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nami, Sanam</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Safari, Fatemeh</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ahangarkani, Fatemeh</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Meis, Jacques F.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Badali, Hamid</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Morovati, Hamid</creatorcontrib><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Algology Mycology and Protozoology Abstracts (Microbiology C)</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>Mycoses</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Vaseghi, Narges</au><au>Sharifisooraki, Joobin</au><au>Khodadadi, Hossein</au><au>Nami, Sanam</au><au>Safari, Fatemeh</au><au>Ahangarkani, Fatemeh</au><au>Meis, Jacques F.</au><au>Badali, Hamid</au><au>Morovati, Hamid</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Global prevalence and subgroup analyses of coronavirus disease (COVID‐19) associated Candida auris infections (CACa): A systematic review and meta‐analysis</atitle><jtitle>Mycoses</jtitle><addtitle>Mycoses</addtitle><date>2022-07</date><risdate>2022</risdate><volume>65</volume><issue>7</issue><spage>683</spage><epage>703</epage><pages>683-703</pages><issn>0933-7407</issn><eissn>1439-0507</eissn><abstract>Background
Increased hospitalisation rates in the Coronavirus disease 19 (COVID‐19) era lead to a new wave of hospital‐acquired infections such as emerging multidrug‐resistant Candida auris. We aimed to evaluate and estimate the global prevalence of coronavirus‐associated C. auris infection (CACa).
Methods
We searched related databases between December 2019 and April 2022 for studies that reported data about CACa. Meta‐analysis was performed using MedCalc software version 20.104 according to the DerSimonian and Laird method applying the random‐effects model. We evaluated heterogeneity using the χ2‐based Q statistic (significant for p‐value < .1) and the I2 statistic (>75% indicative of ‘notable’ heterogeneity). Moreover, if possible, an odds ratio (OR) analysis was performed for eligible data.
Results
Our meta‐analysis includes ten eligible studies, including 1942 patients hospitalised with COVID‐19; 129 were C. auris cases. The overall pooled prevalence of CACa was estimated at 5.7%. The mortality rate of CACa was estimated at 67.849%. Hypertension was the most prevalent comorbidity (59.374%), followed by diabetes mellitus (52.898%) and cardiovascular diseases (31.392%). Men with a prevalence rate of 80.012% were 3.27 (OR) times more prone to getting infected by C. auris.
Conclusion
We concluded that the prevalence of C. auris infections decreased during the COVID‐19 pandemic and the prevalence gradient changed from Asia to America. Unfortunately, there are many descriptive studies with duplicate content in the field of epidemiology of C. auris infections which are increasing every day. We suggest further non‐descriptive studies to accurately establish the cause‐and‐effect relationships between C. auris and COVID‐19 infections.</abstract><cop>Germany</cop><pub>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</pub><pmid>35555921</pmid><doi>10.1111/myc.13471</doi><tpages>21</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3253-6080</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9509-5708</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9187-5555</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9507-8764</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3629-7446</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3569-0035</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6010-8414</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0933-7407 |
ispartof | Mycoses, 2022-07, Vol.65 (7), p.683-703 |
issn | 0933-7407 1439-0507 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_9347948 |
source | Wiley Journals |
subjects | Candida auris Cardiovascular diseases coronavirus disease 19 (COVID‐19) Coronaviruses COVID associated infections COVID-19 Diabetes mellitus Epidemiology Infections Meta-analysis prevalence Review risk factors SARS‐CoV‐2 |
title | Global prevalence and subgroup analyses of coronavirus disease (COVID‐19) associated Candida auris infections (CACa): A systematic review and meta‐analysis |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-29T07%3A03%3A09IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Global%20prevalence%20and%20subgroup%20analyses%20of%20coronavirus%20disease%20(COVID%E2%80%9019)%20associated%20Candida%20auris%20infections%20(CACa):%20A%20systematic%20review%20and%20meta%E2%80%90analysis&rft.jtitle=Mycoses&rft.au=Vaseghi,%20Narges&rft.date=2022-07&rft.volume=65&rft.issue=7&rft.spage=683&rft.epage=703&rft.pages=683-703&rft.issn=0933-7407&rft.eissn=1439-0507&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111/myc.13471&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E2664785575%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2678171370&rft_id=info:pmid/35555921&rfr_iscdi=true |