Opioid use after uro-oncologic surgeries in time of opioid crisis

Introduction: Recent literature emphasizes how overprescription and lack of guidelines contribute to wide variation in opioid prescribing practices and opioid-related harms. We conducted a prospective, observational study to evaluate opioid prescriptions among uro-oncologic patients discharged follo...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Canadian Urological Association journal 2022-08, Vol.16 (8), p.e432-E436
Hauptverfasser: Turcotte, Bruno, Jacques, Emma, Tremblay, Samuel, Toren, Paul, Caumartin, Yves, Lodde, Michele
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page E436
container_issue 8
container_start_page e432
container_title Canadian Urological Association journal
container_volume 16
creator Turcotte, Bruno
Jacques, Emma
Tremblay, Samuel
Toren, Paul
Caumartin, Yves
Lodde, Michele
description Introduction: Recent literature emphasizes how overprescription and lack of guidelines contribute to wide variation in opioid prescribing practices and opioid-related harms. We conducted a prospective, observational study to evaluate opioid prescriptions among uro-oncologic patients discharged following elective inpatient surgery. Methods: Patients who underwent four surgeries were included: open retropubic radical prostatectomy, robot-assisted radical prostatectomy, laparoscopic radical nephrectomy, and laparoscopic partial nephrectomy. The primary outcome was the dose of opioids used after discharge (in oral morphine equivalents [MEq]). Secondary outcomes included: opioid requirements for 80% of the patients, management of unused opioids, opioid use three months postoperative, opioid prescription refills, and guidance about opioid disposal. Results: Sixty patients were included for analysis. Patients used a mean of 30 MEq (95% confidence interval 17.8-42.2) at home and 80% of the patients used 50 MEq or less. A mean of 40.4 MEq per patient was overprescribed. Fifty percent of the patients kept the remaining opioids at home, with only 20.0% returning them to their pharmacy. After three months, 5.0% of the patients were using opioids at least occasionally. Three patients needed a new opioid prescription. Forty percent reported having received information regarding management of unused opioids. Conclusions: We found 60% of opioids prescribed were unused, with half of our patients keeping these unused tablets at home. Our results suggest appropriate opioid prescription amounts needed for urological cancer surgery, with 80% of the patients using 50 MEq or less of morphine equivalents.
doi_str_mv 10.5489/cuaj.7633
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>gale_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_9343155</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><galeid>A714098361</galeid><sourcerecordid>A714098361</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-g332t-8fa7891f8cf20af305404c89d4fc8eb3389105d1f932d3168085cf621cbdefe03</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNptzc1O3DAUBWALUQGlLHiDCKSKLjK1YydxNkgjRFskVBYta8vjXGcuSuLBP1X79vVoWMxIyAtb5373mJBLRhe1kN1Xk_TLom04PyJnrKtoySomjrdvxspGtPSUfAzhhdImJ-0JOeU1p1XOz8jyaYMO-yIFKLSN4IvkXelm40Y3oClC8gN4hFDgXEScoHC2cLsd4zFg-EQ-WD0GuHi7z8nzt_vfdz_Kx6fvD3fLx3LgvIqltLqVHbPS2Ipqy2ktqDCy64U1Elac5yGte2Y7XvWcNZLK2timYmbVgwXKz8ntrneTVhP0Bubo9ag2Hift_ymnUR1OZlyrwf1RHRec1XUuuHkr8O41QYhqwmBgHPUMLgVVNYJRymW7_et6Rwc9gsLZutxotlwtWyZoJ3nDsrp6R5kNvqp9tHgH5dPDhMbNYDHnB61fDhayifA3DjqFoB5-_Ty0n_fsGvQY18GNKaKbwz78D9QSprY</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2641003870</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Opioid use after uro-oncologic surgeries in time of opioid crisis</title><source>EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals</source><source>PubMed Central</source><creator>Turcotte, Bruno ; Jacques, Emma ; Tremblay, Samuel ; Toren, Paul ; Caumartin, Yves ; Lodde, Michele</creator><creatorcontrib>Turcotte, Bruno ; Jacques, Emma ; Tremblay, Samuel ; Toren, Paul ; Caumartin, Yves ; Lodde, Michele</creatorcontrib><description>Introduction: Recent literature emphasizes how overprescription and lack of guidelines contribute to wide variation in opioid prescribing practices and opioid-related harms. We conducted a prospective, observational study to evaluate opioid prescriptions among uro-oncologic patients discharged following elective inpatient surgery. Methods: Patients who underwent four surgeries were included: open retropubic radical prostatectomy, robot-assisted radical prostatectomy, laparoscopic radical nephrectomy, and laparoscopic partial nephrectomy. The primary outcome was the dose of opioids used after discharge (in oral morphine equivalents [MEq]). Secondary outcomes included: opioid requirements for 80% of the patients, management of unused opioids, opioid use three months postoperative, opioid prescription refills, and guidance about opioid disposal. Results: Sixty patients were included for analysis. Patients used a mean of 30 MEq (95% confidence interval 17.8-42.2) at home and 80% of the patients used 50 MEq or less. A mean of 40.4 MEq per patient was overprescribed. Fifty percent of the patients kept the remaining opioids at home, with only 20.0% returning them to their pharmacy. After three months, 5.0% of the patients were using opioids at least occasionally. Three patients needed a new opioid prescription. Forty percent reported having received information regarding management of unused opioids. Conclusions: We found 60% of opioids prescribed were unused, with half of our patients keeping these unused tablets at home. Our results suggest appropriate opioid prescription amounts needed for urological cancer surgery, with 80% of the patients using 50 MEq or less of morphine equivalents.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1911-6470</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1920-1214</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.5489/cuaj.7633</identifier><identifier>PMID: 35302470</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Canadian Urological Association</publisher><subject>Care and treatment ; Dosage and administration ; Drug therapy ; Opioids ; Original Research ; Pain, Postoperative ; Risk factors ; Surgery ; Surveys ; Urinary organs ; Urinary tract cancer</subject><ispartof>Canadian Urological Association journal, 2022-08, Vol.16 (8), p.e432-E436</ispartof><rights>COPYRIGHT 2022 Canadian Urological Association</rights><rights>Copyright: © 2022 Canadian Urological Association or its licensors 2022</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9343155/pdf/$$EPDF$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9343155/$$EHTML$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,727,780,784,885,27924,27925,53791,53793</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Turcotte, Bruno</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jacques, Emma</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tremblay, Samuel</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Toren, Paul</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Caumartin, Yves</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lodde, Michele</creatorcontrib><title>Opioid use after uro-oncologic surgeries in time of opioid crisis</title><title>Canadian Urological Association journal</title><description>Introduction: Recent literature emphasizes how overprescription and lack of guidelines contribute to wide variation in opioid prescribing practices and opioid-related harms. We conducted a prospective, observational study to evaluate opioid prescriptions among uro-oncologic patients discharged following elective inpatient surgery. Methods: Patients who underwent four surgeries were included: open retropubic radical prostatectomy, robot-assisted radical prostatectomy, laparoscopic radical nephrectomy, and laparoscopic partial nephrectomy. The primary outcome was the dose of opioids used after discharge (in oral morphine equivalents [MEq]). Secondary outcomes included: opioid requirements for 80% of the patients, management of unused opioids, opioid use three months postoperative, opioid prescription refills, and guidance about opioid disposal. Results: Sixty patients were included for analysis. Patients used a mean of 30 MEq (95% confidence interval 17.8-42.2) at home and 80% of the patients used 50 MEq or less. A mean of 40.4 MEq per patient was overprescribed. Fifty percent of the patients kept the remaining opioids at home, with only 20.0% returning them to their pharmacy. After three months, 5.0% of the patients were using opioids at least occasionally. Three patients needed a new opioid prescription. Forty percent reported having received information regarding management of unused opioids. Conclusions: We found 60% of opioids prescribed were unused, with half of our patients keeping these unused tablets at home. Our results suggest appropriate opioid prescription amounts needed for urological cancer surgery, with 80% of the patients using 50 MEq or less of morphine equivalents.</description><subject>Care and treatment</subject><subject>Dosage and administration</subject><subject>Drug therapy</subject><subject>Opioids</subject><subject>Original Research</subject><subject>Pain, Postoperative</subject><subject>Risk factors</subject><subject>Surgery</subject><subject>Surveys</subject><subject>Urinary organs</subject><subject>Urinary tract cancer</subject><issn>1911-6470</issn><issn>1920-1214</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2022</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNptzc1O3DAUBWALUQGlLHiDCKSKLjK1YydxNkgjRFskVBYta8vjXGcuSuLBP1X79vVoWMxIyAtb5373mJBLRhe1kN1Xk_TLom04PyJnrKtoySomjrdvxspGtPSUfAzhhdImJ-0JOeU1p1XOz8jyaYMO-yIFKLSN4IvkXelm40Y3oClC8gN4hFDgXEScoHC2cLsd4zFg-EQ-WD0GuHi7z8nzt_vfdz_Kx6fvD3fLx3LgvIqltLqVHbPS2Ipqy2ktqDCy64U1Elac5yGte2Y7XvWcNZLK2timYmbVgwXKz8ntrneTVhP0Bubo9ag2Hift_ymnUR1OZlyrwf1RHRec1XUuuHkr8O41QYhqwmBgHPUMLgVVNYJRymW7_et6Rwc9gsLZutxotlwtWyZoJ3nDsrp6R5kNvqp9tHgH5dPDhMbNYDHnB61fDhayifA3DjqFoB5-_Ty0n_fsGvQY18GNKaKbwz78D9QSprY</recordid><startdate>20220801</startdate><enddate>20220801</enddate><creator>Turcotte, Bruno</creator><creator>Jacques, Emma</creator><creator>Tremblay, Samuel</creator><creator>Toren, Paul</creator><creator>Caumartin, Yves</creator><creator>Lodde, Michele</creator><general>Canadian Urological Association</general><general>Canadian Medical Association</general><scope>ISN</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20220801</creationdate><title>Opioid use after uro-oncologic surgeries in time of opioid crisis</title><author>Turcotte, Bruno ; Jacques, Emma ; Tremblay, Samuel ; Toren, Paul ; Caumartin, Yves ; Lodde, Michele</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-g332t-8fa7891f8cf20af305404c89d4fc8eb3389105d1f932d3168085cf621cbdefe03</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2022</creationdate><topic>Care and treatment</topic><topic>Dosage and administration</topic><topic>Drug therapy</topic><topic>Opioids</topic><topic>Original Research</topic><topic>Pain, Postoperative</topic><topic>Risk factors</topic><topic>Surgery</topic><topic>Surveys</topic><topic>Urinary organs</topic><topic>Urinary tract cancer</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Turcotte, Bruno</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jacques, Emma</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tremblay, Samuel</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Toren, Paul</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Caumartin, Yves</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lodde, Michele</creatorcontrib><collection>Gale In Context: Canada</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>Canadian Urological Association journal</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Turcotte, Bruno</au><au>Jacques, Emma</au><au>Tremblay, Samuel</au><au>Toren, Paul</au><au>Caumartin, Yves</au><au>Lodde, Michele</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Opioid use after uro-oncologic surgeries in time of opioid crisis</atitle><jtitle>Canadian Urological Association journal</jtitle><date>2022-08-01</date><risdate>2022</risdate><volume>16</volume><issue>8</issue><spage>e432</spage><epage>E436</epage><pages>e432-E436</pages><issn>1911-6470</issn><eissn>1920-1214</eissn><abstract>Introduction: Recent literature emphasizes how overprescription and lack of guidelines contribute to wide variation in opioid prescribing practices and opioid-related harms. We conducted a prospective, observational study to evaluate opioid prescriptions among uro-oncologic patients discharged following elective inpatient surgery. Methods: Patients who underwent four surgeries were included: open retropubic radical prostatectomy, robot-assisted radical prostatectomy, laparoscopic radical nephrectomy, and laparoscopic partial nephrectomy. The primary outcome was the dose of opioids used after discharge (in oral morphine equivalents [MEq]). Secondary outcomes included: opioid requirements for 80% of the patients, management of unused opioids, opioid use three months postoperative, opioid prescription refills, and guidance about opioid disposal. Results: Sixty patients were included for analysis. Patients used a mean of 30 MEq (95% confidence interval 17.8-42.2) at home and 80% of the patients used 50 MEq or less. A mean of 40.4 MEq per patient was overprescribed. Fifty percent of the patients kept the remaining opioids at home, with only 20.0% returning them to their pharmacy. After three months, 5.0% of the patients were using opioids at least occasionally. Three patients needed a new opioid prescription. Forty percent reported having received information regarding management of unused opioids. Conclusions: We found 60% of opioids prescribed were unused, with half of our patients keeping these unused tablets at home. Our results suggest appropriate opioid prescription amounts needed for urological cancer surgery, with 80% of the patients using 50 MEq or less of morphine equivalents.</abstract><pub>Canadian Urological Association</pub><pmid>35302470</pmid><doi>10.5489/cuaj.7633</doi><tpages>5</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1911-6470
ispartof Canadian Urological Association journal, 2022-08, Vol.16 (8), p.e432-E436
issn 1911-6470
1920-1214
language eng
recordid cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_9343155
source EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals; PubMed Central
subjects Care and treatment
Dosage and administration
Drug therapy
Opioids
Original Research
Pain, Postoperative
Risk factors
Surgery
Surveys
Urinary organs
Urinary tract cancer
title Opioid use after uro-oncologic surgeries in time of opioid crisis
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-04T01%3A15%3A32IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-gale_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Opioid%20use%20after%20uro-oncologic%20surgeries%20in%20time%20of%20opioid%20crisis&rft.jtitle=Canadian%20Urological%20Association%20journal&rft.au=Turcotte,%20Bruno&rft.date=2022-08-01&rft.volume=16&rft.issue=8&rft.spage=e432&rft.epage=E436&rft.pages=e432-E436&rft.issn=1911-6470&rft.eissn=1920-1214&rft_id=info:doi/10.5489/cuaj.7633&rft_dat=%3Cgale_pubme%3EA714098361%3C/gale_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2641003870&rft_id=info:pmid/35302470&rft_galeid=A714098361&rfr_iscdi=true