Surface Coverage as an Important Parameter for Predicting Selectivity Trends in Electrochemical CO2 Reduction
The electrochemical CO2 reduction reaction (CO2RR) is important for a sustainable future. Key insights into the reaction pathways have been obtained by density functional theory (DFT) analysis, but so far, DFT has been unable to give an overall understanding of selectivity trends without important c...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Journal of physical chemistry. C 2022-07, Vol.126 (29), p.11927-11936 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 11936 |
---|---|
container_issue | 29 |
container_start_page | 11927 |
container_title | Journal of physical chemistry. C |
container_volume | 126 |
creator | Morrison, Andrew R. T. Ramdin, Mahinder van der Broeke, Leo J. P. de Jong, Wiebren Vlugt, Thijs J. H. Kortlever, Ruud |
description | The electrochemical CO2 reduction reaction (CO2RR) is important for a sustainable future. Key insights into the reaction pathways have been obtained by density functional theory (DFT) analysis, but so far, DFT has been unable to give an overall understanding of selectivity trends without important caveats. We show that an unconsidered parameter in DFT models of electrocatalyststhe surface coverage of reacting speciesis crucial for understanding the CO2RR selectivities for different surfaces. Surface coverage is a parameter that must be assumed in most DFT studies of CO2RR electrocatalysts, but so far, only the coverage of nonreacting adsorbates has been treated. Explicitly treating the surface coverage of reacting adsorbates allows for an investigation that can more closely mimic operating conditions. Furthermore, and of more immediate importance, the use of surface coverage-dependent adsorption energies allows for the extraction of ratios of adsorption energies of CO2RR intermediates (COOHads and HCOOads) that are shown to be predictive of selectivity and are not susceptible to systematic errors. This approach allows for categorization of the selectivity of several monometallic catalysts (Pt, Pd, Au, Ag, Zn, Cu, Rh, W, Pb, Sn, In, Cd, and Tl), even problematic ones such as Ag or Zn, and does so by only considering the adsorption energies of known intermediates. The selectivity of the further reduction of COOHads can now be explained by a preference for Tafel or Heyrovsky reactions, recontextualizing the nature of selectivity of some catalysts. In summary, this work resolves differences between DFT and experimental studies of the CO2RR and underlines the importance of surface coverage. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1021/acs.jpcc.2c00520 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_9340765</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2699704232</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-a252t-d7d2d2131fe3b05cf0defff1b57aad06db706a5e4f920b85befadc528116731a3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpVkctLxDAQh4Movu8ec_Tgrnk07fYiyLI-QFB8nMM0maxZ2mRN2gX_e6sugqf5MfPxg-Ej5IyzKWeCX4LJ09XamKkwjCnBdsghr6WYVIVSu3-5qA7IUc6rEZGMy31yIFUtZkLWh6R7GZIDg3QeN5hgiRQyhUDvu3VMPYSePkGCDntM1MVEnxJab3oflvQFWxzTxvef9DVhsJn6QBffyxTNO3beQEvnj4I-ox1GMoYTsuegzXi6ncfk7WbxOr-bPDze3s-vHyYglOgntrLCCi65Q9kwZRyz6JzjjaoALCttU7ESFBauFqyZqQYdWKPEjPOykhzkMbn67V0PTYfWYOgTtHqdfAfpU0fw-v8l-He9jBtdy4JVpRoLzrcFKX4MmHvd-WywbSFgHLIWZV1XrBBSjOjFLzrK0Ks4pDB-pjnT34b0z3I0pLeG5Be0A4di</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2699704232</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Surface Coverage as an Important Parameter for Predicting Selectivity Trends in Electrochemical CO2 Reduction</title><source>American Chemical Society Journals</source><creator>Morrison, Andrew R. T. ; Ramdin, Mahinder ; van der Broeke, Leo J. P. ; de Jong, Wiebren ; Vlugt, Thijs J. H. ; Kortlever, Ruud</creator><creatorcontrib>Morrison, Andrew R. T. ; Ramdin, Mahinder ; van der Broeke, Leo J. P. ; de Jong, Wiebren ; Vlugt, Thijs J. H. ; Kortlever, Ruud</creatorcontrib><description>The electrochemical CO2 reduction reaction (CO2RR) is important for a sustainable future. Key insights into the reaction pathways have been obtained by density functional theory (DFT) analysis, but so far, DFT has been unable to give an overall understanding of selectivity trends without important caveats. We show that an unconsidered parameter in DFT models of electrocatalyststhe surface coverage of reacting speciesis crucial for understanding the CO2RR selectivities for different surfaces. Surface coverage is a parameter that must be assumed in most DFT studies of CO2RR electrocatalysts, but so far, only the coverage of nonreacting adsorbates has been treated. Explicitly treating the surface coverage of reacting adsorbates allows for an investigation that can more closely mimic operating conditions. Furthermore, and of more immediate importance, the use of surface coverage-dependent adsorption energies allows for the extraction of ratios of adsorption energies of CO2RR intermediates (COOHads and HCOOads) that are shown to be predictive of selectivity and are not susceptible to systematic errors. This approach allows for categorization of the selectivity of several monometallic catalysts (Pt, Pd, Au, Ag, Zn, Cu, Rh, W, Pb, Sn, In, Cd, and Tl), even problematic ones such as Ag or Zn, and does so by only considering the adsorption energies of known intermediates. The selectivity of the further reduction of COOHads can now be explained by a preference for Tafel or Heyrovsky reactions, recontextualizing the nature of selectivity of some catalysts. In summary, this work resolves differences between DFT and experimental studies of the CO2RR and underlines the importance of surface coverage.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1932-7447</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1932-7455</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1021/acs.jpcc.2c00520</identifier><identifier>PMID: 35928239</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>American Chemical Society</publisher><subject>C: Chemical and Catalytic Reactivity at Interfaces</subject><ispartof>Journal of physical chemistry. C, 2022-07, Vol.126 (29), p.11927-11936</ispartof><rights>2022 The Authors. Published by American Chemical Society</rights><rights>2022 The Authors. Published by American Chemical Society.</rights><rights>2022 The Authors. Published by American Chemical Society 2022 The Authors</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><orcidid>0000-0002-8476-7035 ; 0000-0003-3059-8712 ; 0000-0001-9412-7480</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://pubs.acs.org/doi/pdf/10.1021/acs.jpcc.2c00520$$EPDF$$P50$$Gacs$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://pubs.acs.org/doi/10.1021/acs.jpcc.2c00520$$EHTML$$P50$$Gacs$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,776,780,881,27053,27901,27902,56713,56763</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Morrison, Andrew R. T.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ramdin, Mahinder</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>van der Broeke, Leo J. P.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>de Jong, Wiebren</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Vlugt, Thijs J. H.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kortlever, Ruud</creatorcontrib><title>Surface Coverage as an Important Parameter for Predicting Selectivity Trends in Electrochemical CO2 Reduction</title><title>Journal of physical chemistry. C</title><addtitle>J. Phys. Chem. C</addtitle><description>The electrochemical CO2 reduction reaction (CO2RR) is important for a sustainable future. Key insights into the reaction pathways have been obtained by density functional theory (DFT) analysis, but so far, DFT has been unable to give an overall understanding of selectivity trends without important caveats. We show that an unconsidered parameter in DFT models of electrocatalyststhe surface coverage of reacting speciesis crucial for understanding the CO2RR selectivities for different surfaces. Surface coverage is a parameter that must be assumed in most DFT studies of CO2RR electrocatalysts, but so far, only the coverage of nonreacting adsorbates has been treated. Explicitly treating the surface coverage of reacting adsorbates allows for an investigation that can more closely mimic operating conditions. Furthermore, and of more immediate importance, the use of surface coverage-dependent adsorption energies allows for the extraction of ratios of adsorption energies of CO2RR intermediates (COOHads and HCOOads) that are shown to be predictive of selectivity and are not susceptible to systematic errors. This approach allows for categorization of the selectivity of several monometallic catalysts (Pt, Pd, Au, Ag, Zn, Cu, Rh, W, Pb, Sn, In, Cd, and Tl), even problematic ones such as Ag or Zn, and does so by only considering the adsorption energies of known intermediates. The selectivity of the further reduction of COOHads can now be explained by a preference for Tafel or Heyrovsky reactions, recontextualizing the nature of selectivity of some catalysts. In summary, this work resolves differences between DFT and experimental studies of the CO2RR and underlines the importance of surface coverage.</description><subject>C: Chemical and Catalytic Reactivity at Interfaces</subject><issn>1932-7447</issn><issn>1932-7455</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2022</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNpVkctLxDAQh4Movu8ec_Tgrnk07fYiyLI-QFB8nMM0maxZ2mRN2gX_e6sugqf5MfPxg-Ej5IyzKWeCX4LJ09XamKkwjCnBdsghr6WYVIVSu3-5qA7IUc6rEZGMy31yIFUtZkLWh6R7GZIDg3QeN5hgiRQyhUDvu3VMPYSePkGCDntM1MVEnxJab3oflvQFWxzTxvef9DVhsJn6QBffyxTNO3beQEvnj4I-ox1GMoYTsuegzXi6ncfk7WbxOr-bPDze3s-vHyYglOgntrLCCi65Q9kwZRyz6JzjjaoALCttU7ESFBauFqyZqQYdWKPEjPOykhzkMbn67V0PTYfWYOgTtHqdfAfpU0fw-v8l-He9jBtdy4JVpRoLzrcFKX4MmHvd-WywbSFgHLIWZV1XrBBSjOjFLzrK0Ks4pDB-pjnT34b0z3I0pLeG5Be0A4di</recordid><startdate>20220728</startdate><enddate>20220728</enddate><creator>Morrison, Andrew R. T.</creator><creator>Ramdin, Mahinder</creator><creator>van der Broeke, Leo J. P.</creator><creator>de Jong, Wiebren</creator><creator>Vlugt, Thijs J. H.</creator><creator>Kortlever, Ruud</creator><general>American Chemical Society</general><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8476-7035</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3059-8712</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9412-7480</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20220728</creationdate><title>Surface Coverage as an Important Parameter for Predicting Selectivity Trends in Electrochemical CO2 Reduction</title><author>Morrison, Andrew R. T. ; Ramdin, Mahinder ; van der Broeke, Leo J. P. ; de Jong, Wiebren ; Vlugt, Thijs J. H. ; Kortlever, Ruud</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-a252t-d7d2d2131fe3b05cf0defff1b57aad06db706a5e4f920b85befadc528116731a3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2022</creationdate><topic>C: Chemical and Catalytic Reactivity at Interfaces</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Morrison, Andrew R. T.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ramdin, Mahinder</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>van der Broeke, Leo J. P.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>de Jong, Wiebren</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Vlugt, Thijs J. H.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kortlever, Ruud</creatorcontrib><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>Journal of physical chemistry. C</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Morrison, Andrew R. T.</au><au>Ramdin, Mahinder</au><au>van der Broeke, Leo J. P.</au><au>de Jong, Wiebren</au><au>Vlugt, Thijs J. H.</au><au>Kortlever, Ruud</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Surface Coverage as an Important Parameter for Predicting Selectivity Trends in Electrochemical CO2 Reduction</atitle><jtitle>Journal of physical chemistry. C</jtitle><addtitle>J. Phys. Chem. C</addtitle><date>2022-07-28</date><risdate>2022</risdate><volume>126</volume><issue>29</issue><spage>11927</spage><epage>11936</epage><pages>11927-11936</pages><issn>1932-7447</issn><eissn>1932-7455</eissn><abstract>The electrochemical CO2 reduction reaction (CO2RR) is important for a sustainable future. Key insights into the reaction pathways have been obtained by density functional theory (DFT) analysis, but so far, DFT has been unable to give an overall understanding of selectivity trends without important caveats. We show that an unconsidered parameter in DFT models of electrocatalyststhe surface coverage of reacting speciesis crucial for understanding the CO2RR selectivities for different surfaces. Surface coverage is a parameter that must be assumed in most DFT studies of CO2RR electrocatalysts, but so far, only the coverage of nonreacting adsorbates has been treated. Explicitly treating the surface coverage of reacting adsorbates allows for an investigation that can more closely mimic operating conditions. Furthermore, and of more immediate importance, the use of surface coverage-dependent adsorption energies allows for the extraction of ratios of adsorption energies of CO2RR intermediates (COOHads and HCOOads) that are shown to be predictive of selectivity and are not susceptible to systematic errors. This approach allows for categorization of the selectivity of several monometallic catalysts (Pt, Pd, Au, Ag, Zn, Cu, Rh, W, Pb, Sn, In, Cd, and Tl), even problematic ones such as Ag or Zn, and does so by only considering the adsorption energies of known intermediates. The selectivity of the further reduction of COOHads can now be explained by a preference for Tafel or Heyrovsky reactions, recontextualizing the nature of selectivity of some catalysts. In summary, this work resolves differences between DFT and experimental studies of the CO2RR and underlines the importance of surface coverage.</abstract><pub>American Chemical Society</pub><pmid>35928239</pmid><doi>10.1021/acs.jpcc.2c00520</doi><tpages>10</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8476-7035</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3059-8712</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9412-7480</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1932-7447 |
ispartof | Journal of physical chemistry. C, 2022-07, Vol.126 (29), p.11927-11936 |
issn | 1932-7447 1932-7455 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_9340765 |
source | American Chemical Society Journals |
subjects | C: Chemical and Catalytic Reactivity at Interfaces |
title | Surface Coverage as an Important Parameter for Predicting Selectivity Trends in Electrochemical CO2 Reduction |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-14T11%3A31%3A23IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Surface%20Coverage%20as%20an%20Important%20Parameter%20for%20Predicting%20Selectivity%20Trends%20in%20Electrochemical%20CO2%20Reduction&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20physical%20chemistry.%20C&rft.au=Morrison,%20Andrew%20R.%20T.&rft.date=2022-07-28&rft.volume=126&rft.issue=29&rft.spage=11927&rft.epage=11936&rft.pages=11927-11936&rft.issn=1932-7447&rft.eissn=1932-7455&rft_id=info:doi/10.1021/acs.jpcc.2c00520&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E2699704232%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2699704232&rft_id=info:pmid/35928239&rfr_iscdi=true |