How to Regulate the Right to Self-Medicate
In Pharmaceutical Freedom Professor Flanigan argues we ought to grant people self-medication rights for the same reasons we respect people’s right to give (or refuse to give) informed consent to treatment. Despite being the most comprehensive argument in favour of self-medication written to date, Fl...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | HEC forum 2022-09, Vol.34 (3), p.233-255 |
---|---|
1. Verfasser: | |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 255 |
---|---|
container_issue | 3 |
container_start_page | 233 |
container_title | HEC forum |
container_volume | 34 |
creator | Roberts, Joseph T. F. |
description | In
Pharmaceutical Freedom
Professor Flanigan argues we ought to grant people self-medication rights for the same reasons we respect people’s right to give (or refuse to give) informed consent to treatment. Despite being the most comprehensive argument in favour of self-medication written to date, Flanigan’s
Pharmaceutical Freedom
leaves a number of questions unanswered, making it unclear how the safe-guards Flanigan incorporates to protect people from harming themselves would work in practice. In this paper, I extend Professor Flanigan’s account by discussing a hypothetical case to illustrate how these safe-guards could work together to protect people from harms caused by their own ignorance or incompetence. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1007/s10730-020-09415-7 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_9338001</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2696324346</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c451t-5c028ef80418ef55ea5d20cc776be6cb921a5c4f7eec1c00901c92cbe3afad6c3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kU9Lw0AQxRdRbK1-AU8FLyJEZ_9lsxdBilpBEaqel81m0qakSc0mit_erSmKHjwMAzO_95jdR8gxhXMKoC48BcUhAhZKCyojtUOGVCoWJUInu2QIWsYRU1wNyIH3SwAQEsQ-GXAmtNCaDcnZtH4ft_V4hvOutC2O2wWOZ8V80W6mT1jm0QNmhQurQ7KX29Lj0baPyMvN9fNkGt0_3t5Nru4jJyRtI-mAJZgnIGhoUqKVGQPnlIpTjF2qGbXSiVwhOuoANFCnmUuR29xmseMjctn7rrt0hZnDqm1sadZNsbLNh6ltYX5vqmJh5vWb0ZwnADQYnG4Nmvq1Q9-aVeEdlqWtsO68YQJ0LBSlENCTP-iy7poqPM-wWMfhn7iIA8V6yjW19w3m38dQMJsoTB-FCVGYryiMCiLei3yAqzk2P9b_qD4BkHuJig</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2696324346</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>How to Regulate the Right to Self-Medicate</title><source>Springer Nature - Complete Springer Journals</source><source>HeinOnline Law Journal Library</source><creator>Roberts, Joseph T. F.</creator><creatorcontrib>Roberts, Joseph T. F.</creatorcontrib><description>In
Pharmaceutical Freedom
Professor Flanigan argues we ought to grant people self-medication rights for the same reasons we respect people’s right to give (or refuse to give) informed consent to treatment. Despite being the most comprehensive argument in favour of self-medication written to date, Flanigan’s
Pharmaceutical Freedom
leaves a number of questions unanswered, making it unclear how the safe-guards Flanigan incorporates to protect people from harming themselves would work in practice. In this paper, I extend Professor Flanigan’s account by discussing a hypothetical case to illustrate how these safe-guards could work together to protect people from harms caused by their own ignorance or incompetence.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0956-2737</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1572-8498</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s10730-020-09415-7</identifier><identifier>PMID: 32494992</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Dordrecht: Springer Netherlands</publisher><subject>Diabetes ; Drug stores ; Education ; Ethics ; Informed consent ; Insulin ; Medical Law ; Pharmaceuticals ; Pharmacists ; Philosophy ; Philosophy of Medicine ; Self-medication ; Theory of Medicine/Bioethics</subject><ispartof>HEC forum, 2022-09, Vol.34 (3), p.233-255</ispartof><rights>The Author(s) 2020</rights><rights>The Author(s) 2020. This work is published under http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c451t-5c028ef80418ef55ea5d20cc776be6cb921a5c4f7eec1c00901c92cbe3afad6c3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c451t-5c028ef80418ef55ea5d20cc776be6cb921a5c4f7eec1c00901c92cbe3afad6c3</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-9261-7694</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s10730-020-09415-7$$EPDF$$P50$$Gspringer$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/10.1007/s10730-020-09415-7$$EHTML$$P50$$Gspringer$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,776,780,881,27901,27902,41464,42533,51294</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Roberts, Joseph T. F.</creatorcontrib><title>How to Regulate the Right to Self-Medicate</title><title>HEC forum</title><addtitle>HEC Forum</addtitle><description>In
Pharmaceutical Freedom
Professor Flanigan argues we ought to grant people self-medication rights for the same reasons we respect people’s right to give (or refuse to give) informed consent to treatment. Despite being the most comprehensive argument in favour of self-medication written to date, Flanigan’s
Pharmaceutical Freedom
leaves a number of questions unanswered, making it unclear how the safe-guards Flanigan incorporates to protect people from harming themselves would work in practice. In this paper, I extend Professor Flanigan’s account by discussing a hypothetical case to illustrate how these safe-guards could work together to protect people from harms caused by their own ignorance or incompetence.</description><subject>Diabetes</subject><subject>Drug stores</subject><subject>Education</subject><subject>Ethics</subject><subject>Informed consent</subject><subject>Insulin</subject><subject>Medical Law</subject><subject>Pharmaceuticals</subject><subject>Pharmacists</subject><subject>Philosophy</subject><subject>Philosophy of Medicine</subject><subject>Self-medication</subject><subject>Theory of Medicine/Bioethics</subject><issn>0956-2737</issn><issn>1572-8498</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2022</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>C6C</sourceid><sourceid>8G5</sourceid><sourceid>AVQMV</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>GUQSH</sourceid><sourceid>K50</sourceid><sourceid>M1D</sourceid><sourceid>M2O</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kU9Lw0AQxRdRbK1-AU8FLyJEZ_9lsxdBilpBEaqel81m0qakSc0mit_erSmKHjwMAzO_95jdR8gxhXMKoC48BcUhAhZKCyojtUOGVCoWJUInu2QIWsYRU1wNyIH3SwAQEsQ-GXAmtNCaDcnZtH4ft_V4hvOutC2O2wWOZ8V80W6mT1jm0QNmhQurQ7KX29Lj0baPyMvN9fNkGt0_3t5Nru4jJyRtI-mAJZgnIGhoUqKVGQPnlIpTjF2qGbXSiVwhOuoANFCnmUuR29xmseMjctn7rrt0hZnDqm1sadZNsbLNh6ltYX5vqmJh5vWb0ZwnADQYnG4Nmvq1Q9-aVeEdlqWtsO68YQJ0LBSlENCTP-iy7poqPM-wWMfhn7iIA8V6yjW19w3m38dQMJsoTB-FCVGYryiMCiLei3yAqzk2P9b_qD4BkHuJig</recordid><startdate>20220901</startdate><enddate>20220901</enddate><creator>Roberts, Joseph T. F.</creator><general>Springer Netherlands</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>C6C</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7WY</scope><scope>7WZ</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>87Z</scope><scope>88C</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8FL</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>AABKS</scope><scope>ABSDQ</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AVQMV</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BEZIV</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FRNLG</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>F~G</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>K50</scope><scope>K60</scope><scope>K6~</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>L.-</scope><scope>M0C</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M0T</scope><scope>M1D</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>PADUT</scope><scope>PQBIZ</scope><scope>PQBZA</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PYYUZ</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9261-7694</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20220901</creationdate><title>How to Regulate the Right to Self-Medicate</title><author>Roberts, Joseph T. F.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c451t-5c028ef80418ef55ea5d20cc776be6cb921a5c4f7eec1c00901c92cbe3afad6c3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2022</creationdate><topic>Diabetes</topic><topic>Drug stores</topic><topic>Education</topic><topic>Ethics</topic><topic>Informed consent</topic><topic>Insulin</topic><topic>Medical Law</topic><topic>Pharmaceuticals</topic><topic>Pharmacists</topic><topic>Philosophy</topic><topic>Philosophy of Medicine</topic><topic>Self-medication</topic><topic>Theory of Medicine/Bioethics</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Roberts, Joseph T. F.</creatorcontrib><collection>Springer Nature OA Free Journals</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (PDF only)</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Healthcare Administration Database (Alumni)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Philosophy Collection</collection><collection>Philosophy Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Arts Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Business Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Business Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (Corporate)</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>Art, Design & Architecture Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Professional Advanced</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Healthcare Administration Database</collection><collection>Arts & Humanities Database</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Research Library</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>Research Library China</collection><collection>One Business (ProQuest)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Business (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection China</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>HEC forum</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Roberts, Joseph T. F.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>How to Regulate the Right to Self-Medicate</atitle><jtitle>HEC forum</jtitle><stitle>HEC Forum</stitle><date>2022-09-01</date><risdate>2022</risdate><volume>34</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>233</spage><epage>255</epage><pages>233-255</pages><issn>0956-2737</issn><eissn>1572-8498</eissn><abstract>In
Pharmaceutical Freedom
Professor Flanigan argues we ought to grant people self-medication rights for the same reasons we respect people’s right to give (or refuse to give) informed consent to treatment. Despite being the most comprehensive argument in favour of self-medication written to date, Flanigan’s
Pharmaceutical Freedom
leaves a number of questions unanswered, making it unclear how the safe-guards Flanigan incorporates to protect people from harming themselves would work in practice. In this paper, I extend Professor Flanigan’s account by discussing a hypothetical case to illustrate how these safe-guards could work together to protect people from harms caused by their own ignorance or incompetence.</abstract><cop>Dordrecht</cop><pub>Springer Netherlands</pub><pmid>32494992</pmid><doi>10.1007/s10730-020-09415-7</doi><tpages>23</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9261-7694</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0956-2737 |
ispartof | HEC forum, 2022-09, Vol.34 (3), p.233-255 |
issn | 0956-2737 1572-8498 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_9338001 |
source | Springer Nature - Complete Springer Journals; HeinOnline Law Journal Library |
subjects | Diabetes Drug stores Education Ethics Informed consent Insulin Medical Law Pharmaceuticals Pharmacists Philosophy Philosophy of Medicine Self-medication Theory of Medicine/Bioethics |
title | How to Regulate the Right to Self-Medicate |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-12T13%3A36%3A21IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=How%20to%20Regulate%20the%20Right%20to%20Self-Medicate&rft.jtitle=HEC%20forum&rft.au=Roberts,%20Joseph%20T.%20F.&rft.date=2022-09-01&rft.volume=34&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=233&rft.epage=255&rft.pages=233-255&rft.issn=0956-2737&rft.eissn=1572-8498&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s10730-020-09415-7&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E2696324346%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2696324346&rft_id=info:pmid/32494992&rfr_iscdi=true |