Global trends in grassland carrying capacity and relative stocking density of livestock
Although the role of livestock in future food systems is debated, animal proteins are unlikely to completely disappear from our diet. Grasslands are a key source of primary productivity for livestock, and feed‐food competition is often limited on such land. Previous research on the potential for sus...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Global change biology 2022-06, Vol.28 (12), p.3902-3919 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 3919 |
---|---|
container_issue | 12 |
container_start_page | 3902 |
container_title | Global change biology |
container_volume | 28 |
creator | Piipponen, Johannes Jalava, Mika Leeuw, Jan Rizayeva, Afag Godde, Cecile Cramer, Gabriel Herrero, Mario Kummu, Matti |
description | Although the role of livestock in future food systems is debated, animal proteins are unlikely to completely disappear from our diet. Grasslands are a key source of primary productivity for livestock, and feed‐food competition is often limited on such land. Previous research on the potential for sustainable grazing has focused on restricted geographical areas or does not consider inter‐annual changes in grazing opportunities. Here, we developed a robust method to estimate trends and interannual variability (IV) in global livestock carrying capacity (number of grazing animals a piece of land can support) over 2001–2015, as well as relative stocking density (the reported livestock distribution relative to the estimated carrying capacity [CC]) in 2010. We first estimated the aboveground biomass that is available for grazers on global grasslands based on the MODIS Net Primary Production product. This was then used to calculate livestock carrying capacities using slopes, forest cover, and animal forage requirements as restrictions. We found that globally, CC decreased on 27% of total grasslands area, mostly in Europe and southeastern Brazil, while it increased on 15% of grasslands, particularly in Sudano‐Sahel and some parts of South America. In 2010, livestock forage requirements exceeded forage availability in northwestern Europe, and southern and eastern Asia. Although our findings imply some opportunities to increase grazing pressures in cold regions, Central Africa, and Australia, the high IV or low biomass supply might prevent considerable increases in stocking densities. The approach and derived open access data sets can feed into global food system modelling, support conservation efforts to reduce land degradation associated with overgrazing, and help identify undergrazed areas for targeted sustainable intensification efforts or rewilding purposes.
We estimated aboveground biomass (AGB) and carrying capacity (CC) over 2001–2015 based on remote sensing and compared those estimates with gridded livestock populations. We found strong negative trends in CC in Europe and southeastern Brazil and potential overgrazing in northwestern Europe, and southern and eastern Asia. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1111/gcb.16174 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_9321565</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2663894650</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4434-24eb4e4edab333373470d3cfe6f3c73903302f1fc54bd46903e2672d04cab74f3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kV9LwzAUxYMobk4f_AJS8EUfuuVf0-5F0KFTEHxRfAxpmtbMrJlJN9m3N13nUMH7kpt7fxxOcgA4RXCIQo0qmQ8RQyndA31EWBJjmrH9tk9ojCAiPXDk_QxCSDBkh6BHkrZBrA9ep8bmwkSNU3XhI11HlRPeG1EXkRTOrXVdhWYhpG7WUTt1yohGr1TkGyvf23What9ubRmZsNjMj8FBKYxXJ9tzAF7ubp8n9_Hj0_Rhcv0YS0oJDUZVThVVhchJqJTQFBZEloqVRKZkDAmBuESlTGheUBbuCrMUF5BKkae0JANw1ekulvlcFVLVjROGL5yeC7fmVmj-e1PrN17ZFR8TjBKWBIGLrYCzH8tgns-1l8qEH1B26TlmFGcZIwwH9PwPOrNLV4fnBYqRbExZAgN12VHSWe-dKndmEORtXDzExTdxBfbsp_sd-Z1PAEYd8KmNWv-vxKeTm07yC6qKn5U</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2663894650</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Global trends in grassland carrying capacity and relative stocking density of livestock</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete</source><creator>Piipponen, Johannes ; Jalava, Mika ; Leeuw, Jan ; Rizayeva, Afag ; Godde, Cecile ; Cramer, Gabriel ; Herrero, Mario ; Kummu, Matti</creator><creatorcontrib>Piipponen, Johannes ; Jalava, Mika ; Leeuw, Jan ; Rizayeva, Afag ; Godde, Cecile ; Cramer, Gabriel ; Herrero, Mario ; Kummu, Matti</creatorcontrib><description>Although the role of livestock in future food systems is debated, animal proteins are unlikely to completely disappear from our diet. Grasslands are a key source of primary productivity for livestock, and feed‐food competition is often limited on such land. Previous research on the potential for sustainable grazing has focused on restricted geographical areas or does not consider inter‐annual changes in grazing opportunities. Here, we developed a robust method to estimate trends and interannual variability (IV) in global livestock carrying capacity (number of grazing animals a piece of land can support) over 2001–2015, as well as relative stocking density (the reported livestock distribution relative to the estimated carrying capacity [CC]) in 2010. We first estimated the aboveground biomass that is available for grazers on global grasslands based on the MODIS Net Primary Production product. This was then used to calculate livestock carrying capacities using slopes, forest cover, and animal forage requirements as restrictions. We found that globally, CC decreased on 27% of total grasslands area, mostly in Europe and southeastern Brazil, while it increased on 15% of grasslands, particularly in Sudano‐Sahel and some parts of South America. In 2010, livestock forage requirements exceeded forage availability in northwestern Europe, and southern and eastern Asia. Although our findings imply some opportunities to increase grazing pressures in cold regions, Central Africa, and Australia, the high IV or low biomass supply might prevent considerable increases in stocking densities. The approach and derived open access data sets can feed into global food system modelling, support conservation efforts to reduce land degradation associated with overgrazing, and help identify undergrazed areas for targeted sustainable intensification efforts or rewilding purposes.
We estimated aboveground biomass (AGB) and carrying capacity (CC) over 2001–2015 based on remote sensing and compared those estimates with gridded livestock populations. We found strong negative trends in CC in Europe and southeastern Brazil and potential overgrazing in northwestern Europe, and southern and eastern Asia.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1354-1013</identifier><identifier>ISSN: 1365-2486</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1365-2486</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1111/gcb.16174</identifier><identifier>PMID: 35320616</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>England: Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisher><subject>aboveground biomass ; Animals ; Biomass ; Brazil ; Carrying capacity ; Cold regions ; Conservation of Natural Resources ; Density ; Environmental restoration ; feed ; Feeds ; Food ; Foods ; Forage ; Grassland ; Grasslands ; Grazing ; interannual variability ; Land conservation ; Land degradation ; Land use ; Livestock ; Livestock feeds ; MODIS ; net primary production ; Net Primary Productivity ; overgrazing ; Primary production ; rangelands ; Stocking ; Stocking density ; Sustainability ; Trends</subject><ispartof>Global change biology, 2022-06, Vol.28 (12), p.3902-3919</ispartof><rights>2022 The Authors. published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.</rights><rights>2022 The Authors. Global Change Biology published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.</rights><rights>2022. This article is published under http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4434-24eb4e4edab333373470d3cfe6f3c73903302f1fc54bd46903e2672d04cab74f3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4434-24eb4e4edab333373470d3cfe6f3c73903302f1fc54bd46903e2672d04cab74f3</cites><orcidid>0000-0003-1789-9799 ; 0000-0002-7165-3012 ; 0000-0003-4133-7462 ; 0000-0002-7741-5090 ; 0000-0001-7020-2503 ; 0000-0001-5096-0163 ; 0000-0002-2187-5370 ; 0000-0003-2925-3397</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1111%2Fgcb.16174$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111%2Fgcb.16174$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,776,780,881,1411,27903,27904,45553,45554</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35320616$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Piipponen, Johannes</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jalava, Mika</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Leeuw, Jan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rizayeva, Afag</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Godde, Cecile</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cramer, Gabriel</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Herrero, Mario</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kummu, Matti</creatorcontrib><title>Global trends in grassland carrying capacity and relative stocking density of livestock</title><title>Global change biology</title><addtitle>Glob Chang Biol</addtitle><description>Although the role of livestock in future food systems is debated, animal proteins are unlikely to completely disappear from our diet. Grasslands are a key source of primary productivity for livestock, and feed‐food competition is often limited on such land. Previous research on the potential for sustainable grazing has focused on restricted geographical areas or does not consider inter‐annual changes in grazing opportunities. Here, we developed a robust method to estimate trends and interannual variability (IV) in global livestock carrying capacity (number of grazing animals a piece of land can support) over 2001–2015, as well as relative stocking density (the reported livestock distribution relative to the estimated carrying capacity [CC]) in 2010. We first estimated the aboveground biomass that is available for grazers on global grasslands based on the MODIS Net Primary Production product. This was then used to calculate livestock carrying capacities using slopes, forest cover, and animal forage requirements as restrictions. We found that globally, CC decreased on 27% of total grasslands area, mostly in Europe and southeastern Brazil, while it increased on 15% of grasslands, particularly in Sudano‐Sahel and some parts of South America. In 2010, livestock forage requirements exceeded forage availability in northwestern Europe, and southern and eastern Asia. Although our findings imply some opportunities to increase grazing pressures in cold regions, Central Africa, and Australia, the high IV or low biomass supply might prevent considerable increases in stocking densities. The approach and derived open access data sets can feed into global food system modelling, support conservation efforts to reduce land degradation associated with overgrazing, and help identify undergrazed areas for targeted sustainable intensification efforts or rewilding purposes.
We estimated aboveground biomass (AGB) and carrying capacity (CC) over 2001–2015 based on remote sensing and compared those estimates with gridded livestock populations. We found strong negative trends in CC in Europe and southeastern Brazil and potential overgrazing in northwestern Europe, and southern and eastern Asia.</description><subject>aboveground biomass</subject><subject>Animals</subject><subject>Biomass</subject><subject>Brazil</subject><subject>Carrying capacity</subject><subject>Cold regions</subject><subject>Conservation of Natural Resources</subject><subject>Density</subject><subject>Environmental restoration</subject><subject>feed</subject><subject>Feeds</subject><subject>Food</subject><subject>Foods</subject><subject>Forage</subject><subject>Grassland</subject><subject>Grasslands</subject><subject>Grazing</subject><subject>interannual variability</subject><subject>Land conservation</subject><subject>Land degradation</subject><subject>Land use</subject><subject>Livestock</subject><subject>Livestock feeds</subject><subject>MODIS</subject><subject>net primary production</subject><subject>Net Primary Productivity</subject><subject>overgrazing</subject><subject>Primary production</subject><subject>rangelands</subject><subject>Stocking</subject><subject>Stocking density</subject><subject>Sustainability</subject><subject>Trends</subject><issn>1354-1013</issn><issn>1365-2486</issn><issn>1365-2486</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2022</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>24P</sourceid><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNp1kV9LwzAUxYMobk4f_AJS8EUfuuVf0-5F0KFTEHxRfAxpmtbMrJlJN9m3N13nUMH7kpt7fxxOcgA4RXCIQo0qmQ8RQyndA31EWBJjmrH9tk9ojCAiPXDk_QxCSDBkh6BHkrZBrA9ep8bmwkSNU3XhI11HlRPeG1EXkRTOrXVdhWYhpG7WUTt1yohGr1TkGyvf23What9ubRmZsNjMj8FBKYxXJ9tzAF7ubp8n9_Hj0_Rhcv0YS0oJDUZVThVVhchJqJTQFBZEloqVRKZkDAmBuESlTGheUBbuCrMUF5BKkae0JANw1ekulvlcFVLVjROGL5yeC7fmVmj-e1PrN17ZFR8TjBKWBIGLrYCzH8tgns-1l8qEH1B26TlmFGcZIwwH9PwPOrNLV4fnBYqRbExZAgN12VHSWe-dKndmEORtXDzExTdxBfbsp_sd-Z1PAEYd8KmNWv-vxKeTm07yC6qKn5U</recordid><startdate>202206</startdate><enddate>202206</enddate><creator>Piipponen, Johannes</creator><creator>Jalava, Mika</creator><creator>Leeuw, Jan</creator><creator>Rizayeva, Afag</creator><creator>Godde, Cecile</creator><creator>Cramer, Gabriel</creator><creator>Herrero, Mario</creator><creator>Kummu, Matti</creator><general>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</general><general>John Wiley and Sons Inc</general><scope>24P</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7SN</scope><scope>7UA</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>F1W</scope><scope>H97</scope><scope>L.G</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1789-9799</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7165-3012</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4133-7462</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7741-5090</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7020-2503</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5096-0163</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2187-5370</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2925-3397</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>202206</creationdate><title>Global trends in grassland carrying capacity and relative stocking density of livestock</title><author>Piipponen, Johannes ; Jalava, Mika ; Leeuw, Jan ; Rizayeva, Afag ; Godde, Cecile ; Cramer, Gabriel ; Herrero, Mario ; Kummu, Matti</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4434-24eb4e4edab333373470d3cfe6f3c73903302f1fc54bd46903e2672d04cab74f3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2022</creationdate><topic>aboveground biomass</topic><topic>Animals</topic><topic>Biomass</topic><topic>Brazil</topic><topic>Carrying capacity</topic><topic>Cold regions</topic><topic>Conservation of Natural Resources</topic><topic>Density</topic><topic>Environmental restoration</topic><topic>feed</topic><topic>Feeds</topic><topic>Food</topic><topic>Foods</topic><topic>Forage</topic><topic>Grassland</topic><topic>Grasslands</topic><topic>Grazing</topic><topic>interannual variability</topic><topic>Land conservation</topic><topic>Land degradation</topic><topic>Land use</topic><topic>Livestock</topic><topic>Livestock feeds</topic><topic>MODIS</topic><topic>net primary production</topic><topic>Net Primary Productivity</topic><topic>overgrazing</topic><topic>Primary production</topic><topic>rangelands</topic><topic>Stocking</topic><topic>Stocking density</topic><topic>Sustainability</topic><topic>Trends</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Piipponen, Johannes</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jalava, Mika</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Leeuw, Jan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rizayeva, Afag</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Godde, Cecile</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cramer, Gabriel</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Herrero, Mario</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kummu, Matti</creatorcontrib><collection>Wiley Online Library Open Access</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Ecology Abstracts</collection><collection>Water Resources Abstracts</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ASFA: Aquatic Sciences and Fisheries Abstracts</collection><collection>Aquatic Science & Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) 3: Aquatic Pollution & Environmental Quality</collection><collection>Aquatic Science & Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) Professional</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>Global change biology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Piipponen, Johannes</au><au>Jalava, Mika</au><au>Leeuw, Jan</au><au>Rizayeva, Afag</au><au>Godde, Cecile</au><au>Cramer, Gabriel</au><au>Herrero, Mario</au><au>Kummu, Matti</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Global trends in grassland carrying capacity and relative stocking density of livestock</atitle><jtitle>Global change biology</jtitle><addtitle>Glob Chang Biol</addtitle><date>2022-06</date><risdate>2022</risdate><volume>28</volume><issue>12</issue><spage>3902</spage><epage>3919</epage><pages>3902-3919</pages><issn>1354-1013</issn><issn>1365-2486</issn><eissn>1365-2486</eissn><abstract>Although the role of livestock in future food systems is debated, animal proteins are unlikely to completely disappear from our diet. Grasslands are a key source of primary productivity for livestock, and feed‐food competition is often limited on such land. Previous research on the potential for sustainable grazing has focused on restricted geographical areas or does not consider inter‐annual changes in grazing opportunities. Here, we developed a robust method to estimate trends and interannual variability (IV) in global livestock carrying capacity (number of grazing animals a piece of land can support) over 2001–2015, as well as relative stocking density (the reported livestock distribution relative to the estimated carrying capacity [CC]) in 2010. We first estimated the aboveground biomass that is available for grazers on global grasslands based on the MODIS Net Primary Production product. This was then used to calculate livestock carrying capacities using slopes, forest cover, and animal forage requirements as restrictions. We found that globally, CC decreased on 27% of total grasslands area, mostly in Europe and southeastern Brazil, while it increased on 15% of grasslands, particularly in Sudano‐Sahel and some parts of South America. In 2010, livestock forage requirements exceeded forage availability in northwestern Europe, and southern and eastern Asia. Although our findings imply some opportunities to increase grazing pressures in cold regions, Central Africa, and Australia, the high IV or low biomass supply might prevent considerable increases in stocking densities. The approach and derived open access data sets can feed into global food system modelling, support conservation efforts to reduce land degradation associated with overgrazing, and help identify undergrazed areas for targeted sustainable intensification efforts or rewilding purposes.
We estimated aboveground biomass (AGB) and carrying capacity (CC) over 2001–2015 based on remote sensing and compared those estimates with gridded livestock populations. We found strong negative trends in CC in Europe and southeastern Brazil and potential overgrazing in northwestern Europe, and southern and eastern Asia.</abstract><cop>England</cop><pub>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</pub><pmid>35320616</pmid><doi>10.1111/gcb.16174</doi><tpages>18</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1789-9799</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7165-3012</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4133-7462</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7741-5090</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7020-2503</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5096-0163</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2187-5370</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2925-3397</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1354-1013 |
ispartof | Global change biology, 2022-06, Vol.28 (12), p.3902-3919 |
issn | 1354-1013 1365-2486 1365-2486 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_9321565 |
source | MEDLINE; Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete |
subjects | aboveground biomass Animals Biomass Brazil Carrying capacity Cold regions Conservation of Natural Resources Density Environmental restoration feed Feeds Food Foods Forage Grassland Grasslands Grazing interannual variability Land conservation Land degradation Land use Livestock Livestock feeds MODIS net primary production Net Primary Productivity overgrazing Primary production rangelands Stocking Stocking density Sustainability Trends |
title | Global trends in grassland carrying capacity and relative stocking density of livestock |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-27T18%3A45%3A59IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Global%20trends%20in%20grassland%20carrying%20capacity%20and%20relative%20stocking%20density%20of%20livestock&rft.jtitle=Global%20change%20biology&rft.au=Piipponen,%20Johannes&rft.date=2022-06&rft.volume=28&rft.issue=12&rft.spage=3902&rft.epage=3919&rft.pages=3902-3919&rft.issn=1354-1013&rft.eissn=1365-2486&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111/gcb.16174&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E2663894650%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2663894650&rft_id=info:pmid/35320616&rfr_iscdi=true |