Global trends in grassland carrying capacity and relative stocking density of livestock

Although the role of livestock in future food systems is debated, animal proteins are unlikely to completely disappear from our diet. Grasslands are a key source of primary productivity for livestock, and feed‐food competition is often limited on such land. Previous research on the potential for sus...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Global change biology 2022-06, Vol.28 (12), p.3902-3919
Hauptverfasser: Piipponen, Johannes, Jalava, Mika, Leeuw, Jan, Rizayeva, Afag, Godde, Cecile, Cramer, Gabriel, Herrero, Mario, Kummu, Matti
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 3919
container_issue 12
container_start_page 3902
container_title Global change biology
container_volume 28
creator Piipponen, Johannes
Jalava, Mika
Leeuw, Jan
Rizayeva, Afag
Godde, Cecile
Cramer, Gabriel
Herrero, Mario
Kummu, Matti
description Although the role of livestock in future food systems is debated, animal proteins are unlikely to completely disappear from our diet. Grasslands are a key source of primary productivity for livestock, and feed‐food competition is often limited on such land. Previous research on the potential for sustainable grazing has focused on restricted geographical areas or does not consider inter‐annual changes in grazing opportunities. Here, we developed a robust method to estimate trends and interannual variability (IV) in global livestock carrying capacity (number of grazing animals a piece of land can support) over 2001–2015, as well as relative stocking density (the reported livestock distribution relative to the estimated carrying capacity [CC]) in 2010. We first estimated the aboveground biomass that is available for grazers on global grasslands based on the MODIS Net Primary Production product. This was then used to calculate livestock carrying capacities using slopes, forest cover, and animal forage requirements as restrictions. We found that globally, CC decreased on 27% of total grasslands area, mostly in Europe and southeastern Brazil, while it increased on 15% of grasslands, particularly in Sudano‐Sahel and some parts of South America. In 2010, livestock forage requirements exceeded forage availability in northwestern Europe, and southern and eastern Asia. Although our findings imply some opportunities to increase grazing pressures in cold regions, Central Africa, and Australia, the high IV or low biomass supply might prevent considerable increases in stocking densities. The approach and derived open access data sets can feed into global food system modelling, support conservation efforts to reduce land degradation associated with overgrazing, and help identify undergrazed areas for targeted sustainable intensification efforts or rewilding purposes. We estimated aboveground biomass (AGB) and carrying capacity (CC) over 2001–2015 based on remote sensing and compared those estimates with gridded livestock populations. We found strong negative trends in CC in Europe and southeastern Brazil and potential overgrazing in northwestern Europe, and southern and eastern Asia.
doi_str_mv 10.1111/gcb.16174
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_9321565</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2663894650</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4434-24eb4e4edab333373470d3cfe6f3c73903302f1fc54bd46903e2672d04cab74f3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kV9LwzAUxYMobk4f_AJS8EUfuuVf0-5F0KFTEHxRfAxpmtbMrJlJN9m3N13nUMH7kpt7fxxOcgA4RXCIQo0qmQ8RQyndA31EWBJjmrH9tk9ojCAiPXDk_QxCSDBkh6BHkrZBrA9ep8bmwkSNU3XhI11HlRPeG1EXkRTOrXVdhWYhpG7WUTt1yohGr1TkGyvf23What9ubRmZsNjMj8FBKYxXJ9tzAF7ubp8n9_Hj0_Rhcv0YS0oJDUZVThVVhchJqJTQFBZEloqVRKZkDAmBuESlTGheUBbuCrMUF5BKkae0JANw1ekulvlcFVLVjROGL5yeC7fmVmj-e1PrN17ZFR8TjBKWBIGLrYCzH8tgns-1l8qEH1B26TlmFGcZIwwH9PwPOrNLV4fnBYqRbExZAgN12VHSWe-dKndmEORtXDzExTdxBfbsp_sd-Z1PAEYd8KmNWv-vxKeTm07yC6qKn5U</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2663894650</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Global trends in grassland carrying capacity and relative stocking density of livestock</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete</source><creator>Piipponen, Johannes ; Jalava, Mika ; Leeuw, Jan ; Rizayeva, Afag ; Godde, Cecile ; Cramer, Gabriel ; Herrero, Mario ; Kummu, Matti</creator><creatorcontrib>Piipponen, Johannes ; Jalava, Mika ; Leeuw, Jan ; Rizayeva, Afag ; Godde, Cecile ; Cramer, Gabriel ; Herrero, Mario ; Kummu, Matti</creatorcontrib><description>Although the role of livestock in future food systems is debated, animal proteins are unlikely to completely disappear from our diet. Grasslands are a key source of primary productivity for livestock, and feed‐food competition is often limited on such land. Previous research on the potential for sustainable grazing has focused on restricted geographical areas or does not consider inter‐annual changes in grazing opportunities. Here, we developed a robust method to estimate trends and interannual variability (IV) in global livestock carrying capacity (number of grazing animals a piece of land can support) over 2001–2015, as well as relative stocking density (the reported livestock distribution relative to the estimated carrying capacity [CC]) in 2010. We first estimated the aboveground biomass that is available for grazers on global grasslands based on the MODIS Net Primary Production product. This was then used to calculate livestock carrying capacities using slopes, forest cover, and animal forage requirements as restrictions. We found that globally, CC decreased on 27% of total grasslands area, mostly in Europe and southeastern Brazil, while it increased on 15% of grasslands, particularly in Sudano‐Sahel and some parts of South America. In 2010, livestock forage requirements exceeded forage availability in northwestern Europe, and southern and eastern Asia. Although our findings imply some opportunities to increase grazing pressures in cold regions, Central Africa, and Australia, the high IV or low biomass supply might prevent considerable increases in stocking densities. The approach and derived open access data sets can feed into global food system modelling, support conservation efforts to reduce land degradation associated with overgrazing, and help identify undergrazed areas for targeted sustainable intensification efforts or rewilding purposes. We estimated aboveground biomass (AGB) and carrying capacity (CC) over 2001–2015 based on remote sensing and compared those estimates with gridded livestock populations. We found strong negative trends in CC in Europe and southeastern Brazil and potential overgrazing in northwestern Europe, and southern and eastern Asia.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1354-1013</identifier><identifier>ISSN: 1365-2486</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1365-2486</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1111/gcb.16174</identifier><identifier>PMID: 35320616</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>England: Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisher><subject>aboveground biomass ; Animals ; Biomass ; Brazil ; Carrying capacity ; Cold regions ; Conservation of Natural Resources ; Density ; Environmental restoration ; feed ; Feeds ; Food ; Foods ; Forage ; Grassland ; Grasslands ; Grazing ; interannual variability ; Land conservation ; Land degradation ; Land use ; Livestock ; Livestock feeds ; MODIS ; net primary production ; Net Primary Productivity ; overgrazing ; Primary production ; rangelands ; Stocking ; Stocking density ; Sustainability ; Trends</subject><ispartof>Global change biology, 2022-06, Vol.28 (12), p.3902-3919</ispartof><rights>2022 The Authors. published by John Wiley &amp; Sons Ltd.</rights><rights>2022 The Authors. Global Change Biology published by John Wiley &amp; Sons Ltd.</rights><rights>2022. This article is published under http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4434-24eb4e4edab333373470d3cfe6f3c73903302f1fc54bd46903e2672d04cab74f3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4434-24eb4e4edab333373470d3cfe6f3c73903302f1fc54bd46903e2672d04cab74f3</cites><orcidid>0000-0003-1789-9799 ; 0000-0002-7165-3012 ; 0000-0003-4133-7462 ; 0000-0002-7741-5090 ; 0000-0001-7020-2503 ; 0000-0001-5096-0163 ; 0000-0002-2187-5370 ; 0000-0003-2925-3397</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1111%2Fgcb.16174$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111%2Fgcb.16174$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,776,780,881,1411,27903,27904,45553,45554</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35320616$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Piipponen, Johannes</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jalava, Mika</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Leeuw, Jan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rizayeva, Afag</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Godde, Cecile</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cramer, Gabriel</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Herrero, Mario</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kummu, Matti</creatorcontrib><title>Global trends in grassland carrying capacity and relative stocking density of livestock</title><title>Global change biology</title><addtitle>Glob Chang Biol</addtitle><description>Although the role of livestock in future food systems is debated, animal proteins are unlikely to completely disappear from our diet. Grasslands are a key source of primary productivity for livestock, and feed‐food competition is often limited on such land. Previous research on the potential for sustainable grazing has focused on restricted geographical areas or does not consider inter‐annual changes in grazing opportunities. Here, we developed a robust method to estimate trends and interannual variability (IV) in global livestock carrying capacity (number of grazing animals a piece of land can support) over 2001–2015, as well as relative stocking density (the reported livestock distribution relative to the estimated carrying capacity [CC]) in 2010. We first estimated the aboveground biomass that is available for grazers on global grasslands based on the MODIS Net Primary Production product. This was then used to calculate livestock carrying capacities using slopes, forest cover, and animal forage requirements as restrictions. We found that globally, CC decreased on 27% of total grasslands area, mostly in Europe and southeastern Brazil, while it increased on 15% of grasslands, particularly in Sudano‐Sahel and some parts of South America. In 2010, livestock forage requirements exceeded forage availability in northwestern Europe, and southern and eastern Asia. Although our findings imply some opportunities to increase grazing pressures in cold regions, Central Africa, and Australia, the high IV or low biomass supply might prevent considerable increases in stocking densities. The approach and derived open access data sets can feed into global food system modelling, support conservation efforts to reduce land degradation associated with overgrazing, and help identify undergrazed areas for targeted sustainable intensification efforts or rewilding purposes. We estimated aboveground biomass (AGB) and carrying capacity (CC) over 2001–2015 based on remote sensing and compared those estimates with gridded livestock populations. We found strong negative trends in CC in Europe and southeastern Brazil and potential overgrazing in northwestern Europe, and southern and eastern Asia.</description><subject>aboveground biomass</subject><subject>Animals</subject><subject>Biomass</subject><subject>Brazil</subject><subject>Carrying capacity</subject><subject>Cold regions</subject><subject>Conservation of Natural Resources</subject><subject>Density</subject><subject>Environmental restoration</subject><subject>feed</subject><subject>Feeds</subject><subject>Food</subject><subject>Foods</subject><subject>Forage</subject><subject>Grassland</subject><subject>Grasslands</subject><subject>Grazing</subject><subject>interannual variability</subject><subject>Land conservation</subject><subject>Land degradation</subject><subject>Land use</subject><subject>Livestock</subject><subject>Livestock feeds</subject><subject>MODIS</subject><subject>net primary production</subject><subject>Net Primary Productivity</subject><subject>overgrazing</subject><subject>Primary production</subject><subject>rangelands</subject><subject>Stocking</subject><subject>Stocking density</subject><subject>Sustainability</subject><subject>Trends</subject><issn>1354-1013</issn><issn>1365-2486</issn><issn>1365-2486</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2022</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>24P</sourceid><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNp1kV9LwzAUxYMobk4f_AJS8EUfuuVf0-5F0KFTEHxRfAxpmtbMrJlJN9m3N13nUMH7kpt7fxxOcgA4RXCIQo0qmQ8RQyndA31EWBJjmrH9tk9ojCAiPXDk_QxCSDBkh6BHkrZBrA9ep8bmwkSNU3XhI11HlRPeG1EXkRTOrXVdhWYhpG7WUTt1yohGr1TkGyvf23What9ubRmZsNjMj8FBKYxXJ9tzAF7ubp8n9_Hj0_Rhcv0YS0oJDUZVThVVhchJqJTQFBZEloqVRKZkDAmBuESlTGheUBbuCrMUF5BKkae0JANw1ekulvlcFVLVjROGL5yeC7fmVmj-e1PrN17ZFR8TjBKWBIGLrYCzH8tgns-1l8qEH1B26TlmFGcZIwwH9PwPOrNLV4fnBYqRbExZAgN12VHSWe-dKndmEORtXDzExTdxBfbsp_sd-Z1PAEYd8KmNWv-vxKeTm07yC6qKn5U</recordid><startdate>202206</startdate><enddate>202206</enddate><creator>Piipponen, Johannes</creator><creator>Jalava, Mika</creator><creator>Leeuw, Jan</creator><creator>Rizayeva, Afag</creator><creator>Godde, Cecile</creator><creator>Cramer, Gabriel</creator><creator>Herrero, Mario</creator><creator>Kummu, Matti</creator><general>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</general><general>John Wiley and Sons Inc</general><scope>24P</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7SN</scope><scope>7UA</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>F1W</scope><scope>H97</scope><scope>L.G</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1789-9799</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7165-3012</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4133-7462</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7741-5090</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7020-2503</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5096-0163</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2187-5370</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2925-3397</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>202206</creationdate><title>Global trends in grassland carrying capacity and relative stocking density of livestock</title><author>Piipponen, Johannes ; Jalava, Mika ; Leeuw, Jan ; Rizayeva, Afag ; Godde, Cecile ; Cramer, Gabriel ; Herrero, Mario ; Kummu, Matti</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4434-24eb4e4edab333373470d3cfe6f3c73903302f1fc54bd46903e2672d04cab74f3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2022</creationdate><topic>aboveground biomass</topic><topic>Animals</topic><topic>Biomass</topic><topic>Brazil</topic><topic>Carrying capacity</topic><topic>Cold regions</topic><topic>Conservation of Natural Resources</topic><topic>Density</topic><topic>Environmental restoration</topic><topic>feed</topic><topic>Feeds</topic><topic>Food</topic><topic>Foods</topic><topic>Forage</topic><topic>Grassland</topic><topic>Grasslands</topic><topic>Grazing</topic><topic>interannual variability</topic><topic>Land conservation</topic><topic>Land degradation</topic><topic>Land use</topic><topic>Livestock</topic><topic>Livestock feeds</topic><topic>MODIS</topic><topic>net primary production</topic><topic>Net Primary Productivity</topic><topic>overgrazing</topic><topic>Primary production</topic><topic>rangelands</topic><topic>Stocking</topic><topic>Stocking density</topic><topic>Sustainability</topic><topic>Trends</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Piipponen, Johannes</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jalava, Mika</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Leeuw, Jan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rizayeva, Afag</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Godde, Cecile</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cramer, Gabriel</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Herrero, Mario</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kummu, Matti</creatorcontrib><collection>Wiley Online Library Open Access</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Ecology Abstracts</collection><collection>Water Resources Abstracts</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ASFA: Aquatic Sciences and Fisheries Abstracts</collection><collection>Aquatic Science &amp; Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) 3: Aquatic Pollution &amp; Environmental Quality</collection><collection>Aquatic Science &amp; Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) Professional</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>Global change biology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Piipponen, Johannes</au><au>Jalava, Mika</au><au>Leeuw, Jan</au><au>Rizayeva, Afag</au><au>Godde, Cecile</au><au>Cramer, Gabriel</au><au>Herrero, Mario</au><au>Kummu, Matti</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Global trends in grassland carrying capacity and relative stocking density of livestock</atitle><jtitle>Global change biology</jtitle><addtitle>Glob Chang Biol</addtitle><date>2022-06</date><risdate>2022</risdate><volume>28</volume><issue>12</issue><spage>3902</spage><epage>3919</epage><pages>3902-3919</pages><issn>1354-1013</issn><issn>1365-2486</issn><eissn>1365-2486</eissn><abstract>Although the role of livestock in future food systems is debated, animal proteins are unlikely to completely disappear from our diet. Grasslands are a key source of primary productivity for livestock, and feed‐food competition is often limited on such land. Previous research on the potential for sustainable grazing has focused on restricted geographical areas or does not consider inter‐annual changes in grazing opportunities. Here, we developed a robust method to estimate trends and interannual variability (IV) in global livestock carrying capacity (number of grazing animals a piece of land can support) over 2001–2015, as well as relative stocking density (the reported livestock distribution relative to the estimated carrying capacity [CC]) in 2010. We first estimated the aboveground biomass that is available for grazers on global grasslands based on the MODIS Net Primary Production product. This was then used to calculate livestock carrying capacities using slopes, forest cover, and animal forage requirements as restrictions. We found that globally, CC decreased on 27% of total grasslands area, mostly in Europe and southeastern Brazil, while it increased on 15% of grasslands, particularly in Sudano‐Sahel and some parts of South America. In 2010, livestock forage requirements exceeded forage availability in northwestern Europe, and southern and eastern Asia. Although our findings imply some opportunities to increase grazing pressures in cold regions, Central Africa, and Australia, the high IV or low biomass supply might prevent considerable increases in stocking densities. The approach and derived open access data sets can feed into global food system modelling, support conservation efforts to reduce land degradation associated with overgrazing, and help identify undergrazed areas for targeted sustainable intensification efforts or rewilding purposes. We estimated aboveground biomass (AGB) and carrying capacity (CC) over 2001–2015 based on remote sensing and compared those estimates with gridded livestock populations. We found strong negative trends in CC in Europe and southeastern Brazil and potential overgrazing in northwestern Europe, and southern and eastern Asia.</abstract><cop>England</cop><pub>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</pub><pmid>35320616</pmid><doi>10.1111/gcb.16174</doi><tpages>18</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1789-9799</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7165-3012</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4133-7462</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7741-5090</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7020-2503</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5096-0163</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2187-5370</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2925-3397</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1354-1013
ispartof Global change biology, 2022-06, Vol.28 (12), p.3902-3919
issn 1354-1013
1365-2486
1365-2486
language eng
recordid cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_9321565
source MEDLINE; Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete
subjects aboveground biomass
Animals
Biomass
Brazil
Carrying capacity
Cold regions
Conservation of Natural Resources
Density
Environmental restoration
feed
Feeds
Food
Foods
Forage
Grassland
Grasslands
Grazing
interannual variability
Land conservation
Land degradation
Land use
Livestock
Livestock feeds
MODIS
net primary production
Net Primary Productivity
overgrazing
Primary production
rangelands
Stocking
Stocking density
Sustainability
Trends
title Global trends in grassland carrying capacity and relative stocking density of livestock
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-27T18%3A45%3A59IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Global%20trends%20in%20grassland%20carrying%20capacity%20and%20relative%20stocking%20density%20of%20livestock&rft.jtitle=Global%20change%20biology&rft.au=Piipponen,%20Johannes&rft.date=2022-06&rft.volume=28&rft.issue=12&rft.spage=3902&rft.epage=3919&rft.pages=3902-3919&rft.issn=1354-1013&rft.eissn=1365-2486&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111/gcb.16174&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E2663894650%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2663894650&rft_id=info:pmid/35320616&rfr_iscdi=true