Health Equity, History, and a New Presidential Bioethics Commission: Lessons from the “Lost” Reports

Convening a national bioethics commission has historically been one of the most powerful bioethical legacies a US presidential administration can undertake. The Biden Administration has not yet created such a commission; here we argue that centering health equity and healthcare access would provide...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of general internal medicine : JGIM 2022-10, Vol.37 (13), p.3471-3474
Hauptverfasser: Kolbe, Laura, Fins, Joseph J.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 3474
container_issue 13
container_start_page 3471
container_title Journal of general internal medicine : JGIM
container_volume 37
creator Kolbe, Laura
Fins, Joseph J.
description Convening a national bioethics commission has historically been one of the most powerful bioethical legacies a US presidential administration can undertake. The Biden Administration has not yet created such a commission; here we argue that centering health equity and healthcare access would provide a vital framework for a new commission’s legacy. Moreover, we demonstrate two crucial historical episodes when American presidents appointed commissions to examine the practical and ethical implications of these very issues. We turn first to the 1952 President’s Commission report on “Building America’s Health,” a lofty vision of universal healthcare access stymied by both political conflict and unaddressed problems of racism in the era’s legislation. Its rich yet incomplete account of American health inequities serves as a valuable forerunner to questions of justice in bioethics. We then explore the President’s Commission’s 1983 report “Securing Access to Healthcare: A Report on the Ethical Implications of Differences in the Availability of Health Services.” This report took up the mantle of equity in healthcare access, again with mixed results. Only by understanding the checkered history of these overlooked, practically “lost” reports can a new era in American bioethics successfully re-center the goal of equitable health for all.
doi_str_mv 10.1007/s11606-022-07733-9
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_9321266</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2695282708</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c402t-114f9430db09cd5da7c9f25362ca8ca08d791aab8ef7ed99976de81487da5e683</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kc9u1DAQxi0EotuFF-BkiQsHAv6TxDYHpLIqLNIKEIKz5Y0njatsvPU4oN76IOXl-iSYbgWCAxePpfnNp2_mI-QJZy84Y-olct6ytmJCVEwpKStzjyx4I5qK10bdJwumdV1pJesjcox4zhiXQuiH5Eg2WgvF9IIMa3BjHujpxRzy5XO6DphjKh83eeroB_hOPyXA4GHKwY30TYiQh9AhXcXdLiCGOL2iG0CME9I-xR3NA9Cbq-tNxHxz9YN-hn1MGR-RB70bER7f1SX5-vb0y2pdbT6-e7862VRdzUSuOK97U0vmt8x0vvFOdaYXjWxF53TnmPbKcOe2GnoF3hijWg-a11p510Cr5ZK8Puju5-0OfFd8JzfafQo7ly5tdMH-3ZnCYM_iN2uk4KJti8CzO4EUL2bAbMuaHYyjmyDOaEVrGnF7vYI-_Qc9j3OaynpWKCGFbstbKHGguhQRE_S_zXBmfwVpD0HaEqS9DbJ4WRJ5GMICT2eQ_kj_Z-on5SuiGw</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2723286723</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Health Equity, History, and a New Presidential Bioethics Commission: Lessons from the “Lost” Reports</title><source>SpringerLink Journals</source><source>EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals</source><source>PubMed Central</source><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><creator>Kolbe, Laura ; Fins, Joseph J.</creator><creatorcontrib>Kolbe, Laura ; Fins, Joseph J.</creatorcontrib><description>Convening a national bioethics commission has historically been one of the most powerful bioethical legacies a US presidential administration can undertake. The Biden Administration has not yet created such a commission; here we argue that centering health equity and healthcare access would provide a vital framework for a new commission’s legacy. Moreover, we demonstrate two crucial historical episodes when American presidents appointed commissions to examine the practical and ethical implications of these very issues. We turn first to the 1952 President’s Commission report on “Building America’s Health,” a lofty vision of universal healthcare access stymied by both political conflict and unaddressed problems of racism in the era’s legislation. Its rich yet incomplete account of American health inequities serves as a valuable forerunner to questions of justice in bioethics. We then explore the President’s Commission’s 1983 report “Securing Access to Healthcare: A Report on the Ethical Implications of Differences in the Availability of Health Services.” This report took up the mantle of equity in healthcare access, again with mixed results. Only by understanding the checkered history of these overlooked, practically “lost” reports can a new era in American bioethics successfully re-center the goal of equitable health for all.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0884-8734</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1525-1497</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s11606-022-07733-9</identifier><identifier>PMID: 35882708</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Cham: Springer International Publishing</publisher><subject>Bioethics ; Discrimination ; Ethics ; Health care ; Health services ; Internal Medicine ; Legislation ; Medicine ; Medicine &amp; Public Health ; Perspective</subject><ispartof>Journal of general internal medicine : JGIM, 2022-10, Vol.37 (13), p.3471-3474</ispartof><rights>The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Society of General Internal Medicine 2022</rights><rights>The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Society of General Internal Medicine 2022.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c402t-114f9430db09cd5da7c9f25362ca8ca08d791aab8ef7ed99976de81487da5e683</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-8780-8533</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9321266/pdf/$$EPDF$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9321266/$$EHTML$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,723,776,780,881,27903,27904,41467,42536,51297,53769,53771</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Kolbe, Laura</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fins, Joseph J.</creatorcontrib><title>Health Equity, History, and a New Presidential Bioethics Commission: Lessons from the “Lost” Reports</title><title>Journal of general internal medicine : JGIM</title><addtitle>J GEN INTERN MED</addtitle><description>Convening a national bioethics commission has historically been one of the most powerful bioethical legacies a US presidential administration can undertake. The Biden Administration has not yet created such a commission; here we argue that centering health equity and healthcare access would provide a vital framework for a new commission’s legacy. Moreover, we demonstrate two crucial historical episodes when American presidents appointed commissions to examine the practical and ethical implications of these very issues. We turn first to the 1952 President’s Commission report on “Building America’s Health,” a lofty vision of universal healthcare access stymied by both political conflict and unaddressed problems of racism in the era’s legislation. Its rich yet incomplete account of American health inequities serves as a valuable forerunner to questions of justice in bioethics. We then explore the President’s Commission’s 1983 report “Securing Access to Healthcare: A Report on the Ethical Implications of Differences in the Availability of Health Services.” This report took up the mantle of equity in healthcare access, again with mixed results. Only by understanding the checkered history of these overlooked, practically “lost” reports can a new era in American bioethics successfully re-center the goal of equitable health for all.</description><subject>Bioethics</subject><subject>Discrimination</subject><subject>Ethics</subject><subject>Health care</subject><subject>Health services</subject><subject>Internal Medicine</subject><subject>Legislation</subject><subject>Medicine</subject><subject>Medicine &amp; Public Health</subject><subject>Perspective</subject><issn>0884-8734</issn><issn>1525-1497</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2022</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>8G5</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><sourceid>GUQSH</sourceid><sourceid>M2O</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kc9u1DAQxi0EotuFF-BkiQsHAv6TxDYHpLIqLNIKEIKz5Y0njatsvPU4oN76IOXl-iSYbgWCAxePpfnNp2_mI-QJZy84Y-olct6ytmJCVEwpKStzjyx4I5qK10bdJwumdV1pJesjcox4zhiXQuiH5Eg2WgvF9IIMa3BjHujpxRzy5XO6DphjKh83eeroB_hOPyXA4GHKwY30TYiQh9AhXcXdLiCGOL2iG0CME9I-xR3NA9Cbq-tNxHxz9YN-hn1MGR-RB70bER7f1SX5-vb0y2pdbT6-e7862VRdzUSuOK97U0vmt8x0vvFOdaYXjWxF53TnmPbKcOe2GnoF3hijWg-a11p510Cr5ZK8Puju5-0OfFd8JzfafQo7ly5tdMH-3ZnCYM_iN2uk4KJti8CzO4EUL2bAbMuaHYyjmyDOaEVrGnF7vYI-_Qc9j3OaynpWKCGFbstbKHGguhQRE_S_zXBmfwVpD0HaEqS9DbJ4WRJ5GMICT2eQ_kj_Z-on5SuiGw</recordid><startdate>20221001</startdate><enddate>20221001</enddate><creator>Kolbe, Laura</creator><creator>Fins, Joseph J.</creator><general>Springer International Publishing</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7QL</scope><scope>7RV</scope><scope>7U9</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88C</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>H94</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M0T</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>M7N</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>RC3</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8780-8533</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20221001</creationdate><title>Health Equity, History, and a New Presidential Bioethics Commission: Lessons from the “Lost” Reports</title><author>Kolbe, Laura ; Fins, Joseph J.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c402t-114f9430db09cd5da7c9f25362ca8ca08d791aab8ef7ed99976de81487da5e683</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2022</creationdate><topic>Bioethics</topic><topic>Discrimination</topic><topic>Ethics</topic><topic>Health care</topic><topic>Health services</topic><topic>Internal Medicine</topic><topic>Legislation</topic><topic>Medicine</topic><topic>Medicine &amp; Public Health</topic><topic>Perspective</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Kolbe, Laura</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fins, Joseph J.</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Bacteriology Abstracts (Microbiology B)</collection><collection>Proquest Nursing &amp; Allied Health Source</collection><collection>Virology and AIDS Abstracts</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Healthcare Administration Database (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Healthcare Administration Database</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Research Library</collection><collection>Algology Mycology and Protozoology Abstracts (Microbiology C)</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>Genetics Abstracts</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>Journal of general internal medicine : JGIM</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Kolbe, Laura</au><au>Fins, Joseph J.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Health Equity, History, and a New Presidential Bioethics Commission: Lessons from the “Lost” Reports</atitle><jtitle>Journal of general internal medicine : JGIM</jtitle><stitle>J GEN INTERN MED</stitle><date>2022-10-01</date><risdate>2022</risdate><volume>37</volume><issue>13</issue><spage>3471</spage><epage>3474</epage><pages>3471-3474</pages><issn>0884-8734</issn><eissn>1525-1497</eissn><abstract>Convening a national bioethics commission has historically been one of the most powerful bioethical legacies a US presidential administration can undertake. The Biden Administration has not yet created such a commission; here we argue that centering health equity and healthcare access would provide a vital framework for a new commission’s legacy. Moreover, we demonstrate two crucial historical episodes when American presidents appointed commissions to examine the practical and ethical implications of these very issues. We turn first to the 1952 President’s Commission report on “Building America’s Health,” a lofty vision of universal healthcare access stymied by both political conflict and unaddressed problems of racism in the era’s legislation. Its rich yet incomplete account of American health inequities serves as a valuable forerunner to questions of justice in bioethics. We then explore the President’s Commission’s 1983 report “Securing Access to Healthcare: A Report on the Ethical Implications of Differences in the Availability of Health Services.” This report took up the mantle of equity in healthcare access, again with mixed results. Only by understanding the checkered history of these overlooked, practically “lost” reports can a new era in American bioethics successfully re-center the goal of equitable health for all.</abstract><cop>Cham</cop><pub>Springer International Publishing</pub><pmid>35882708</pmid><doi>10.1007/s11606-022-07733-9</doi><tpages>4</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8780-8533</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0884-8734
ispartof Journal of general internal medicine : JGIM, 2022-10, Vol.37 (13), p.3471-3474
issn 0884-8734
1525-1497
language eng
recordid cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_9321266
source SpringerLink Journals; EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals; PubMed Central; Alma/SFX Local Collection
subjects Bioethics
Discrimination
Ethics
Health care
Health services
Internal Medicine
Legislation
Medicine
Medicine & Public Health
Perspective
title Health Equity, History, and a New Presidential Bioethics Commission: Lessons from the “Lost” Reports
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-25T02%3A53%3A14IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Health%20Equity,%20History,%20and%20a%20New%20Presidential%20Bioethics%20Commission:%20Lessons%20from%20the%20%E2%80%9CLost%E2%80%9D%20Reports&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20general%20internal%20medicine%20:%20JGIM&rft.au=Kolbe,%20Laura&rft.date=2022-10-01&rft.volume=37&rft.issue=13&rft.spage=3471&rft.epage=3474&rft.pages=3471-3474&rft.issn=0884-8734&rft.eissn=1525-1497&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s11606-022-07733-9&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E2695282708%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2723286723&rft_id=info:pmid/35882708&rfr_iscdi=true