Health Equity, History, and a New Presidential Bioethics Commission: Lessons from the “Lost” Reports
Convening a national bioethics commission has historically been one of the most powerful bioethical legacies a US presidential administration can undertake. The Biden Administration has not yet created such a commission; here we argue that centering health equity and healthcare access would provide...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Journal of general internal medicine : JGIM 2022-10, Vol.37 (13), p.3471-3474 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 3474 |
---|---|
container_issue | 13 |
container_start_page | 3471 |
container_title | Journal of general internal medicine : JGIM |
container_volume | 37 |
creator | Kolbe, Laura Fins, Joseph J. |
description | Convening a national bioethics commission has historically been one of the most powerful bioethical legacies a US presidential administration can undertake. The Biden Administration has not yet created such a commission; here we argue that centering health equity and healthcare access would provide a vital framework for a new commission’s legacy. Moreover, we demonstrate two crucial historical episodes when American presidents appointed commissions to examine the practical and ethical implications of these very issues. We turn first to the 1952 President’s Commission report on “Building America’s Health,” a lofty vision of universal healthcare access stymied by both political conflict and unaddressed problems of racism in the era’s legislation. Its rich yet incomplete account of American health inequities serves as a valuable forerunner to questions of justice in bioethics. We then explore the President’s Commission’s 1983 report “Securing Access to Healthcare: A Report on the Ethical Implications of Differences in the Availability of Health Services.” This report took up the mantle of equity in healthcare access, again with mixed results. Only by understanding the checkered history of these overlooked, practically “lost” reports can a new era in American bioethics successfully re-center the goal of equitable health for all. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1007/s11606-022-07733-9 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_9321266</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2695282708</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c402t-114f9430db09cd5da7c9f25362ca8ca08d791aab8ef7ed99976de81487da5e683</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kc9u1DAQxi0EotuFF-BkiQsHAv6TxDYHpLIqLNIKEIKz5Y0njatsvPU4oN76IOXl-iSYbgWCAxePpfnNp2_mI-QJZy84Y-olct6ytmJCVEwpKStzjyx4I5qK10bdJwumdV1pJesjcox4zhiXQuiH5Eg2WgvF9IIMa3BjHujpxRzy5XO6DphjKh83eeroB_hOPyXA4GHKwY30TYiQh9AhXcXdLiCGOL2iG0CME9I-xR3NA9Cbq-tNxHxz9YN-hn1MGR-RB70bER7f1SX5-vb0y2pdbT6-e7862VRdzUSuOK97U0vmt8x0vvFOdaYXjWxF53TnmPbKcOe2GnoF3hijWg-a11p510Cr5ZK8Puju5-0OfFd8JzfafQo7ly5tdMH-3ZnCYM_iN2uk4KJti8CzO4EUL2bAbMuaHYyjmyDOaEVrGnF7vYI-_Qc9j3OaynpWKCGFbstbKHGguhQRE_S_zXBmfwVpD0HaEqS9DbJ4WRJ5GMICT2eQ_kj_Z-on5SuiGw</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2723286723</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Health Equity, History, and a New Presidential Bioethics Commission: Lessons from the “Lost” Reports</title><source>SpringerLink Journals</source><source>EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals</source><source>PubMed Central</source><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><creator>Kolbe, Laura ; Fins, Joseph J.</creator><creatorcontrib>Kolbe, Laura ; Fins, Joseph J.</creatorcontrib><description>Convening a national bioethics commission has historically been one of the most powerful bioethical legacies a US presidential administration can undertake. The Biden Administration has not yet created such a commission; here we argue that centering health equity and healthcare access would provide a vital framework for a new commission’s legacy. Moreover, we demonstrate two crucial historical episodes when American presidents appointed commissions to examine the practical and ethical implications of these very issues. We turn first to the 1952 President’s Commission report on “Building America’s Health,” a lofty vision of universal healthcare access stymied by both political conflict and unaddressed problems of racism in the era’s legislation. Its rich yet incomplete account of American health inequities serves as a valuable forerunner to questions of justice in bioethics. We then explore the President’s Commission’s 1983 report “Securing Access to Healthcare: A Report on the Ethical Implications of Differences in the Availability of Health Services.” This report took up the mantle of equity in healthcare access, again with mixed results. Only by understanding the checkered history of these overlooked, practically “lost” reports can a new era in American bioethics successfully re-center the goal of equitable health for all.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0884-8734</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1525-1497</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s11606-022-07733-9</identifier><identifier>PMID: 35882708</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Cham: Springer International Publishing</publisher><subject>Bioethics ; Discrimination ; Ethics ; Health care ; Health services ; Internal Medicine ; Legislation ; Medicine ; Medicine & Public Health ; Perspective</subject><ispartof>Journal of general internal medicine : JGIM, 2022-10, Vol.37 (13), p.3471-3474</ispartof><rights>The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Society of General Internal Medicine 2022</rights><rights>The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Society of General Internal Medicine 2022.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c402t-114f9430db09cd5da7c9f25362ca8ca08d791aab8ef7ed99976de81487da5e683</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-8780-8533</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9321266/pdf/$$EPDF$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9321266/$$EHTML$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,723,776,780,881,27903,27904,41467,42536,51297,53769,53771</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Kolbe, Laura</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fins, Joseph J.</creatorcontrib><title>Health Equity, History, and a New Presidential Bioethics Commission: Lessons from the “Lost” Reports</title><title>Journal of general internal medicine : JGIM</title><addtitle>J GEN INTERN MED</addtitle><description>Convening a national bioethics commission has historically been one of the most powerful bioethical legacies a US presidential administration can undertake. The Biden Administration has not yet created such a commission; here we argue that centering health equity and healthcare access would provide a vital framework for a new commission’s legacy. Moreover, we demonstrate two crucial historical episodes when American presidents appointed commissions to examine the practical and ethical implications of these very issues. We turn first to the 1952 President’s Commission report on “Building America’s Health,” a lofty vision of universal healthcare access stymied by both political conflict and unaddressed problems of racism in the era’s legislation. Its rich yet incomplete account of American health inequities serves as a valuable forerunner to questions of justice in bioethics. We then explore the President’s Commission’s 1983 report “Securing Access to Healthcare: A Report on the Ethical Implications of Differences in the Availability of Health Services.” This report took up the mantle of equity in healthcare access, again with mixed results. Only by understanding the checkered history of these overlooked, practically “lost” reports can a new era in American bioethics successfully re-center the goal of equitable health for all.</description><subject>Bioethics</subject><subject>Discrimination</subject><subject>Ethics</subject><subject>Health care</subject><subject>Health services</subject><subject>Internal Medicine</subject><subject>Legislation</subject><subject>Medicine</subject><subject>Medicine & Public Health</subject><subject>Perspective</subject><issn>0884-8734</issn><issn>1525-1497</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2022</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>8G5</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><sourceid>GUQSH</sourceid><sourceid>M2O</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kc9u1DAQxi0EotuFF-BkiQsHAv6TxDYHpLIqLNIKEIKz5Y0njatsvPU4oN76IOXl-iSYbgWCAxePpfnNp2_mI-QJZy84Y-olct6ytmJCVEwpKStzjyx4I5qK10bdJwumdV1pJesjcox4zhiXQuiH5Eg2WgvF9IIMa3BjHujpxRzy5XO6DphjKh83eeroB_hOPyXA4GHKwY30TYiQh9AhXcXdLiCGOL2iG0CME9I-xR3NA9Cbq-tNxHxz9YN-hn1MGR-RB70bER7f1SX5-vb0y2pdbT6-e7862VRdzUSuOK97U0vmt8x0vvFOdaYXjWxF53TnmPbKcOe2GnoF3hijWg-a11p510Cr5ZK8Puju5-0OfFd8JzfafQo7ly5tdMH-3ZnCYM_iN2uk4KJti8CzO4EUL2bAbMuaHYyjmyDOaEVrGnF7vYI-_Qc9j3OaynpWKCGFbstbKHGguhQRE_S_zXBmfwVpD0HaEqS9DbJ4WRJ5GMICT2eQ_kj_Z-on5SuiGw</recordid><startdate>20221001</startdate><enddate>20221001</enddate><creator>Kolbe, Laura</creator><creator>Fins, Joseph J.</creator><general>Springer International Publishing</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7QL</scope><scope>7RV</scope><scope>7U9</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88C</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>H94</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M0T</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>M7N</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>RC3</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8780-8533</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20221001</creationdate><title>Health Equity, History, and a New Presidential Bioethics Commission: Lessons from the “Lost” Reports</title><author>Kolbe, Laura ; Fins, Joseph J.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c402t-114f9430db09cd5da7c9f25362ca8ca08d791aab8ef7ed99976de81487da5e683</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2022</creationdate><topic>Bioethics</topic><topic>Discrimination</topic><topic>Ethics</topic><topic>Health care</topic><topic>Health services</topic><topic>Internal Medicine</topic><topic>Legislation</topic><topic>Medicine</topic><topic>Medicine & Public Health</topic><topic>Perspective</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Kolbe, Laura</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fins, Joseph J.</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Bacteriology Abstracts (Microbiology B)</collection><collection>Proquest Nursing & Allied Health Source</collection><collection>Virology and AIDS Abstracts</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Healthcare Administration Database (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Healthcare Administration Database</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Research Library</collection><collection>Algology Mycology and Protozoology Abstracts (Microbiology C)</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>Genetics Abstracts</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>Journal of general internal medicine : JGIM</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Kolbe, Laura</au><au>Fins, Joseph J.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Health Equity, History, and a New Presidential Bioethics Commission: Lessons from the “Lost” Reports</atitle><jtitle>Journal of general internal medicine : JGIM</jtitle><stitle>J GEN INTERN MED</stitle><date>2022-10-01</date><risdate>2022</risdate><volume>37</volume><issue>13</issue><spage>3471</spage><epage>3474</epage><pages>3471-3474</pages><issn>0884-8734</issn><eissn>1525-1497</eissn><abstract>Convening a national bioethics commission has historically been one of the most powerful bioethical legacies a US presidential administration can undertake. The Biden Administration has not yet created such a commission; here we argue that centering health equity and healthcare access would provide a vital framework for a new commission’s legacy. Moreover, we demonstrate two crucial historical episodes when American presidents appointed commissions to examine the practical and ethical implications of these very issues. We turn first to the 1952 President’s Commission report on “Building America’s Health,” a lofty vision of universal healthcare access stymied by both political conflict and unaddressed problems of racism in the era’s legislation. Its rich yet incomplete account of American health inequities serves as a valuable forerunner to questions of justice in bioethics. We then explore the President’s Commission’s 1983 report “Securing Access to Healthcare: A Report on the Ethical Implications of Differences in the Availability of Health Services.” This report took up the mantle of equity in healthcare access, again with mixed results. Only by understanding the checkered history of these overlooked, practically “lost” reports can a new era in American bioethics successfully re-center the goal of equitable health for all.</abstract><cop>Cham</cop><pub>Springer International Publishing</pub><pmid>35882708</pmid><doi>10.1007/s11606-022-07733-9</doi><tpages>4</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8780-8533</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0884-8734 |
ispartof | Journal of general internal medicine : JGIM, 2022-10, Vol.37 (13), p.3471-3474 |
issn | 0884-8734 1525-1497 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_9321266 |
source | SpringerLink Journals; EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals; PubMed Central; Alma/SFX Local Collection |
subjects | Bioethics Discrimination Ethics Health care Health services Internal Medicine Legislation Medicine Medicine & Public Health Perspective |
title | Health Equity, History, and a New Presidential Bioethics Commission: Lessons from the “Lost” Reports |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-25T02%3A53%3A14IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Health%20Equity,%20History,%20and%20a%20New%20Presidential%20Bioethics%20Commission:%20Lessons%20from%20the%20%E2%80%9CLost%E2%80%9D%20Reports&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20general%20internal%20medicine%20:%20JGIM&rft.au=Kolbe,%20Laura&rft.date=2022-10-01&rft.volume=37&rft.issue=13&rft.spage=3471&rft.epage=3474&rft.pages=3471-3474&rft.issn=0884-8734&rft.eissn=1525-1497&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s11606-022-07733-9&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E2695282708%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2723286723&rft_id=info:pmid/35882708&rfr_iscdi=true |