The Advantages of Robotic Over Open Thyroidectomy in Thyroid Diseases: A Systematic Review
Over a hundred thousand thyroid surgeries are performed per year in the United States. Although conventional thyroidectomy has successful surgical outcomes, robotic minimally invasive procedures, known for their scar free (regarding the neck, no collar incision) surgical outcomes gained popularity t...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Curēus (Palo Alto, CA) CA), 2022-06, Vol.14 (6), p.e26320-e26320 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | e26320 |
---|---|
container_issue | 6 |
container_start_page | e26320 |
container_title | Curēus (Palo Alto, CA) |
container_volume | 14 |
creator | Haidar Ismail, Nathalie Tavalla, Pardis Uppal, Pulkita Adel Awad mohammed, Shaza Rajashekar, Shriya Giri Ravindran, Suganya Kakarla, Meghana Ausaja Gambo, Musa Yousri Salama, Mustafa Hamid, Pousette |
description | Over a hundred thousand thyroid surgeries are performed per year in the United States. Although conventional thyroidectomy has successful surgical outcomes, robotic minimally invasive procedures, known for their scar free (regarding the neck, no collar incision) surgical outcomes gained popularity through the years. Furthermore, these techniques are new and still debatable. The purpose is to know the advantages of robotic over open thyroidectomy in thyroid diseases. Note that we didn't aim to compare different robotic techniques due to the lack of data.We performed a systematic review comparing surgical approaches for thyroidectomy, open vs robotic techniques, from January 2017 to December 2021, according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) 2020 guidelines. All papers with no full free article access and not in the English language were excluded. The outcomes of interest were superior cosmetics outcome, cost-effectiveness, limitations, operation time, length of hospital stay and postoperative pain or complications, and future outcomes.A literature search was carried out in electronic databases (PubMed, Google Scholar) in order to retrieve all papers comparing the effectiveness of robotic vs open thyroidectomy. An initial reference search yielded 433 articles. Finally, we chose nine studies covering different robotic thyroidectomy techniques compared to the open thyroidectomy approach. Promising results were seen in these studies, especially with superior cosmetic results, less post-operative pain, swallowing discomfort, and voice changes. In addition, the risk of recurrent laryngeal nerve injury is almost the same as the open approach. Multiple types of biases were caused by the selection of the population and the limitation of the studies to certain regions associated with the low numbers of robotic thyroidectomy approaches in Europe and the United States of America and the lack of randomized trials and long-term follow-up respectively. All studies discussed the importance of the surgeon's skills and the patient decision in choosing the appropriate approach for the thyroidectomy depending on the risk factors, a larger number of patients, and longer follow-up from multiple hospitals. |
doi_str_mv | 10.7759/cureus.26320 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_9314274</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2697095549</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c2340-df50fe3c509bc34f110ab9bccee78b87f62a3f6d337be614fd75a38d2ad2a9393</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpdUU1LAzEQDaKoaG_-gIAXD1bzsZtkPQjFbxAKWi9eQjY7sZHupia7lf57t7aICgPzmHnzZoaH0BElZ1LmxbntInTpjAnOyBbaZ1SooaIq2_6F99AgpXdCCCWSEUl20R7PC0o5FfvodTIFPKoWpmnNGyQcHH4KZWi9xeMFRDyeQ4Mn02UMvgLbhnqJ_U8BX_sEJkG6wCP8vEwt1GY1-QQLD5-HaMeZWYLBJh-gl9ubydX98HF893A1ehxaxjMyrFxOHHCbk6K0PHOUElP20AJIVSrpBDPciYpzWYKgmatkbriqmOmj4AU_QJdr3XlX1lBZaNpoZnoefW3iUgfj9d9O46f6LSx0wWnGZNYLnGwEYvjoILW69snCbGYaCF3STBSSFHmerXYd_6O-hy42_XsrlpBK5UL1rNM1y8aQUgT3cwwleuWbXvumv33jX0b_i80</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2696788568</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>The Advantages of Robotic Over Open Thyroidectomy in Thyroid Diseases: A Systematic Review</title><source>PubMed Central Open Access</source><source>PubMed Central</source><creator>Haidar Ismail, Nathalie ; Tavalla, Pardis ; Uppal, Pulkita ; Adel Awad mohammed, Shaza ; Rajashekar, Shriya ; Giri Ravindran, Suganya ; Kakarla, Meghana ; Ausaja Gambo, Musa ; Yousri Salama, Mustafa ; Hamid, Pousette</creator><creatorcontrib>Haidar Ismail, Nathalie ; Tavalla, Pardis ; Uppal, Pulkita ; Adel Awad mohammed, Shaza ; Rajashekar, Shriya ; Giri Ravindran, Suganya ; Kakarla, Meghana ; Ausaja Gambo, Musa ; Yousri Salama, Mustafa ; Hamid, Pousette</creatorcontrib><description>Over a hundred thousand thyroid surgeries are performed per year in the United States. Although conventional thyroidectomy has successful surgical outcomes, robotic minimally invasive procedures, known for their scar free (regarding the neck, no collar incision) surgical outcomes gained popularity through the years. Furthermore, these techniques are new and still debatable. The purpose is to know the advantages of robotic over open thyroidectomy in thyroid diseases. Note that we didn't aim to compare different robotic techniques due to the lack of data.We performed a systematic review comparing surgical approaches for thyroidectomy, open vs robotic techniques, from January 2017 to December 2021, according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) 2020 guidelines. All papers with no full free article access and not in the English language were excluded. The outcomes of interest were superior cosmetics outcome, cost-effectiveness, limitations, operation time, length of hospital stay and postoperative pain or complications, and future outcomes.A literature search was carried out in electronic databases (PubMed, Google Scholar) in order to retrieve all papers comparing the effectiveness of robotic vs open thyroidectomy. An initial reference search yielded 433 articles. Finally, we chose nine studies covering different robotic thyroidectomy techniques compared to the open thyroidectomy approach. Promising results were seen in these studies, especially with superior cosmetic results, less post-operative pain, swallowing discomfort, and voice changes. In addition, the risk of recurrent laryngeal nerve injury is almost the same as the open approach. Multiple types of biases were caused by the selection of the population and the limitation of the studies to certain regions associated with the low numbers of robotic thyroidectomy approaches in Europe and the United States of America and the lack of randomized trials and long-term follow-up respectively. All studies discussed the importance of the surgeon's skills and the patient decision in choosing the appropriate approach for the thyroidectomy depending on the risk factors, a larger number of patients, and longer follow-up from multiple hospitals.</description><identifier>ISSN: 2168-8184</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2168-8184</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.7759/cureus.26320</identifier><identifier>PMID: 35911316</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Palo Alto: Cureus Inc</publisher><subject>Bias ; Cancer ; Dissection ; Endocrinology/Diabetes/Metabolism ; Gender ; General Surgery ; Meta-analysis ; Patients ; Robotics ; Systematic review ; Thyroid diseases ; Thyroidectomy</subject><ispartof>Curēus (Palo Alto, CA), 2022-06, Vol.14 (6), p.e26320-e26320</ispartof><rights>Copyright © 2022, Haidar Ismail et al. This work is published under https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/ (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><rights>Copyright © 2022, Haidar Ismail et al. 2022 Haidar Ismail et al.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c2340-df50fe3c509bc34f110ab9bccee78b87f62a3f6d337be614fd75a38d2ad2a9393</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c2340-df50fe3c509bc34f110ab9bccee78b87f62a3f6d337be614fd75a38d2ad2a9393</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9314274/pdf/$$EPDF$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9314274/$$EHTML$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,727,780,784,885,27923,27924,53790,53792</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Haidar Ismail, Nathalie</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tavalla, Pardis</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Uppal, Pulkita</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Adel Awad mohammed, Shaza</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rajashekar, Shriya</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Giri Ravindran, Suganya</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kakarla, Meghana</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ausaja Gambo, Musa</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yousri Salama, Mustafa</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hamid, Pousette</creatorcontrib><title>The Advantages of Robotic Over Open Thyroidectomy in Thyroid Diseases: A Systematic Review</title><title>Curēus (Palo Alto, CA)</title><description>Over a hundred thousand thyroid surgeries are performed per year in the United States. Although conventional thyroidectomy has successful surgical outcomes, robotic minimally invasive procedures, known for their scar free (regarding the neck, no collar incision) surgical outcomes gained popularity through the years. Furthermore, these techniques are new and still debatable. The purpose is to know the advantages of robotic over open thyroidectomy in thyroid diseases. Note that we didn't aim to compare different robotic techniques due to the lack of data.We performed a systematic review comparing surgical approaches for thyroidectomy, open vs robotic techniques, from January 2017 to December 2021, according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) 2020 guidelines. All papers with no full free article access and not in the English language were excluded. The outcomes of interest were superior cosmetics outcome, cost-effectiveness, limitations, operation time, length of hospital stay and postoperative pain or complications, and future outcomes.A literature search was carried out in electronic databases (PubMed, Google Scholar) in order to retrieve all papers comparing the effectiveness of robotic vs open thyroidectomy. An initial reference search yielded 433 articles. Finally, we chose nine studies covering different robotic thyroidectomy techniques compared to the open thyroidectomy approach. Promising results were seen in these studies, especially with superior cosmetic results, less post-operative pain, swallowing discomfort, and voice changes. In addition, the risk of recurrent laryngeal nerve injury is almost the same as the open approach. Multiple types of biases were caused by the selection of the population and the limitation of the studies to certain regions associated with the low numbers of robotic thyroidectomy approaches in Europe and the United States of America and the lack of randomized trials and long-term follow-up respectively. All studies discussed the importance of the surgeon's skills and the patient decision in choosing the appropriate approach for the thyroidectomy depending on the risk factors, a larger number of patients, and longer follow-up from multiple hospitals.</description><subject>Bias</subject><subject>Cancer</subject><subject>Dissection</subject><subject>Endocrinology/Diabetes/Metabolism</subject><subject>Gender</subject><subject>General Surgery</subject><subject>Meta-analysis</subject><subject>Patients</subject><subject>Robotics</subject><subject>Systematic review</subject><subject>Thyroid diseases</subject><subject>Thyroidectomy</subject><issn>2168-8184</issn><issn>2168-8184</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2022</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><recordid>eNpdUU1LAzEQDaKoaG_-gIAXD1bzsZtkPQjFbxAKWi9eQjY7sZHupia7lf57t7aICgPzmHnzZoaH0BElZ1LmxbntInTpjAnOyBbaZ1SooaIq2_6F99AgpXdCCCWSEUl20R7PC0o5FfvodTIFPKoWpmnNGyQcHH4KZWi9xeMFRDyeQ4Mn02UMvgLbhnqJ_U8BX_sEJkG6wCP8vEwt1GY1-QQLD5-HaMeZWYLBJh-gl9ubydX98HF893A1ehxaxjMyrFxOHHCbk6K0PHOUElP20AJIVSrpBDPciYpzWYKgmatkbriqmOmj4AU_QJdr3XlX1lBZaNpoZnoefW3iUgfj9d9O46f6LSx0wWnGZNYLnGwEYvjoILW69snCbGYaCF3STBSSFHmerXYd_6O-hy42_XsrlpBK5UL1rNM1y8aQUgT3cwwleuWbXvumv33jX0b_i80</recordid><startdate>20220625</startdate><enddate>20220625</enddate><creator>Haidar Ismail, Nathalie</creator><creator>Tavalla, Pardis</creator><creator>Uppal, Pulkita</creator><creator>Adel Awad mohammed, Shaza</creator><creator>Rajashekar, Shriya</creator><creator>Giri Ravindran, Suganya</creator><creator>Kakarla, Meghana</creator><creator>Ausaja Gambo, Musa</creator><creator>Yousri Salama, Mustafa</creator><creator>Hamid, Pousette</creator><general>Cureus Inc</general><general>Cureus</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20220625</creationdate><title>The Advantages of Robotic Over Open Thyroidectomy in Thyroid Diseases: A Systematic Review</title><author>Haidar Ismail, Nathalie ; Tavalla, Pardis ; Uppal, Pulkita ; Adel Awad mohammed, Shaza ; Rajashekar, Shriya ; Giri Ravindran, Suganya ; Kakarla, Meghana ; Ausaja Gambo, Musa ; Yousri Salama, Mustafa ; Hamid, Pousette</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c2340-df50fe3c509bc34f110ab9bccee78b87f62a3f6d337be614fd75a38d2ad2a9393</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2022</creationdate><topic>Bias</topic><topic>Cancer</topic><topic>Dissection</topic><topic>Endocrinology/Diabetes/Metabolism</topic><topic>Gender</topic><topic>General Surgery</topic><topic>Meta-analysis</topic><topic>Patients</topic><topic>Robotics</topic><topic>Systematic review</topic><topic>Thyroid diseases</topic><topic>Thyroidectomy</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Haidar Ismail, Nathalie</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tavalla, Pardis</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Uppal, Pulkita</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Adel Awad mohammed, Shaza</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rajashekar, Shriya</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Giri Ravindran, Suganya</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kakarla, Meghana</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ausaja Gambo, Musa</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yousri Salama, Mustafa</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hamid, Pousette</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Publicly Available Content Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>Curēus (Palo Alto, CA)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Haidar Ismail, Nathalie</au><au>Tavalla, Pardis</au><au>Uppal, Pulkita</au><au>Adel Awad mohammed, Shaza</au><au>Rajashekar, Shriya</au><au>Giri Ravindran, Suganya</au><au>Kakarla, Meghana</au><au>Ausaja Gambo, Musa</au><au>Yousri Salama, Mustafa</au><au>Hamid, Pousette</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>The Advantages of Robotic Over Open Thyroidectomy in Thyroid Diseases: A Systematic Review</atitle><jtitle>Curēus (Palo Alto, CA)</jtitle><date>2022-06-25</date><risdate>2022</risdate><volume>14</volume><issue>6</issue><spage>e26320</spage><epage>e26320</epage><pages>e26320-e26320</pages><issn>2168-8184</issn><eissn>2168-8184</eissn><abstract>Over a hundred thousand thyroid surgeries are performed per year in the United States. Although conventional thyroidectomy has successful surgical outcomes, robotic minimally invasive procedures, known for their scar free (regarding the neck, no collar incision) surgical outcomes gained popularity through the years. Furthermore, these techniques are new and still debatable. The purpose is to know the advantages of robotic over open thyroidectomy in thyroid diseases. Note that we didn't aim to compare different robotic techniques due to the lack of data.We performed a systematic review comparing surgical approaches for thyroidectomy, open vs robotic techniques, from January 2017 to December 2021, according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) 2020 guidelines. All papers with no full free article access and not in the English language were excluded. The outcomes of interest were superior cosmetics outcome, cost-effectiveness, limitations, operation time, length of hospital stay and postoperative pain or complications, and future outcomes.A literature search was carried out in electronic databases (PubMed, Google Scholar) in order to retrieve all papers comparing the effectiveness of robotic vs open thyroidectomy. An initial reference search yielded 433 articles. Finally, we chose nine studies covering different robotic thyroidectomy techniques compared to the open thyroidectomy approach. Promising results were seen in these studies, especially with superior cosmetic results, less post-operative pain, swallowing discomfort, and voice changes. In addition, the risk of recurrent laryngeal nerve injury is almost the same as the open approach. Multiple types of biases were caused by the selection of the population and the limitation of the studies to certain regions associated with the low numbers of robotic thyroidectomy approaches in Europe and the United States of America and the lack of randomized trials and long-term follow-up respectively. All studies discussed the importance of the surgeon's skills and the patient decision in choosing the appropriate approach for the thyroidectomy depending on the risk factors, a larger number of patients, and longer follow-up from multiple hospitals.</abstract><cop>Palo Alto</cop><pub>Cureus Inc</pub><pmid>35911316</pmid><doi>10.7759/cureus.26320</doi><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 2168-8184 |
ispartof | Curēus (Palo Alto, CA), 2022-06, Vol.14 (6), p.e26320-e26320 |
issn | 2168-8184 2168-8184 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_9314274 |
source | PubMed Central Open Access; PubMed Central |
subjects | Bias Cancer Dissection Endocrinology/Diabetes/Metabolism Gender General Surgery Meta-analysis Patients Robotics Systematic review Thyroid diseases Thyroidectomy |
title | The Advantages of Robotic Over Open Thyroidectomy in Thyroid Diseases: A Systematic Review |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-10T20%3A57%3A45IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=The%20Advantages%20of%20Robotic%20Over%20Open%20Thyroidectomy%20in%20Thyroid%20Diseases:%20A%20Systematic%20Review&rft.jtitle=Cur%C4%93us%20(Palo%20Alto,%20CA)&rft.au=Haidar%20Ismail,%20Nathalie&rft.date=2022-06-25&rft.volume=14&rft.issue=6&rft.spage=e26320&rft.epage=e26320&rft.pages=e26320-e26320&rft.issn=2168-8184&rft.eissn=2168-8184&rft_id=info:doi/10.7759/cureus.26320&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E2697095549%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2696788568&rft_id=info:pmid/35911316&rfr_iscdi=true |