A cross-sectional study of assessing knowledge, attitude, and practice of COVID-19 resuscitation among health care workers in a hybrid hospital for COVID-19 in Malaysia
•Emergency HCW have adequate knowledge, but had poor compliance to the European Resuscitation Council (ERC) COVID-19 guidelines.•Emergency HCW were willing to resuscitate COVID-19 patients when airborne-precaution PPE is used, despite fears of nosocomial infection.•Emergency HCW were confident to pe...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | International emergency nursing 2022-09, Vol.64, p.101214-101214, Article 101214 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | •Emergency HCW have adequate knowledge, but had poor compliance to the European Resuscitation Council (ERC) COVID-19 guidelines.•Emergency HCW were willing to resuscitate COVID-19 patients when airborne-precaution PPE is used, despite fears of nosocomial infection.•Emergency HCW were confident to perform CPR, regardless of the expectation of poor prognosis in COVID-19 cardiac arrest patients.•There is a knowledge gap between medical doctors and other allied HCW. Designation, education levels, and COVID-19 training were not independent predictors for good knowledge.
The COVID-19 pandemic is an international public health emergency. As hospitals receive more severe forms of COVID-19 that necessitate resuscitation, emergency health care workers (HCW) must follow interim COVID-19 resuscitation guidelines.
The aim is to evaluate the levels of knowledge, attitude, and practice among emergency HCW of the COVID-19 resuscitation protocol by the European Resuscitation Council (ERC).
A cross-sectional study using a validated questionnaire was conducted among HCW in the emergency department of University of Malaya Medical Centre (UMMC), Malaysia from April to June 2021.
A total of 159 respondents were included in the analysis (89% response rate). Sixty-eight percent of respondents had adequate knowledge regarding COVID-19 resuscitation. Majority of the respondents had knowledge on airborne-precaution personal protective equipment (PPE) (99%) and infection control measures (98%). Nearly 73% were pessimistic about the COVID-19 prognosis. Seventy-three percent of respondents thought an arrested COVID-19 patient may benefit from cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) and 94% were willing to administer CPR provided airborne-precaution PPE was available. Ninety percent of respondents reported adherence to resuscitation guidelines. There were significant differences in the mean knowledge scores between designation, education levels, and COVID-19 training. Overall, the respondents’ level of practice was insufficient (27%), with a mean score of 53.7%(SD = 14.7). There was a lack of practicein the resuscitation oftheintubatedand patients who were beingprone. There was insufficient practice about ventilation technique, use ofsupraglotticdevices, and intubation barriers. There was a positive correlation between adequate knowledge and good practice.
Emergency HCW have adequate knowledge, but poor compliance to the ERC COVID-19 guidelines. Emergency HCW were willing and confident to r |
---|---|
ISSN: | 1755-599X 1532-9267 1878-013X |
DOI: | 10.1016/j.ienj.2022.101214 |