Non‐adjunctive continuous glucose monitoring for control of hypoglycaemia (COACH): Results of a post‐approval observational study

Objective Prior to the Continuous Monitoring and Control of Hypoglycaemia (COACH) study described herein, no study had been powered to evaluate the impact of non‐adjunctive RT‐CGM use on the rate of debilitating moderate or severe hypoglycaemic events. Research Design and Methods In this 12‐month ob...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Diabetic medicine 2022-02, Vol.39 (2), p.e14739-n/a
Hauptverfasser: Beck, Stayce E., Kelly, Colleen, Price, David A., Aronoff, Stephen, Bao, Shichun, Bhargava, Anuj, Biggs, William, Billings, Liana, Blevins, Thomas, Bode, Bruce W, Carlson, Anders, Castorino, Kristin, Fink, Raymond, Harrison, Lindsay, Klonoff, David, Konigsberg, Sarah, Lane, Wendy, Liljenquist, David, Ozer, Kerem, Prakasam, Gnanagurudasan, Tsimikas, Athena, Wahlen, Jack
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page n/a
container_issue 2
container_start_page e14739
container_title Diabetic medicine
container_volume 39
creator Beck, Stayce E.
Kelly, Colleen
Price, David A.
Aronoff, Stephen
Bao, Shichun
Bhargava, Anuj
Biggs, William
Billings, Liana
Blevins, Thomas
Bode, Bruce W
Carlson, Anders
Castorino, Kristin
Fink, Raymond
Harrison, Lindsay
Klonoff, David
Konigsberg, Sarah
Lane, Wendy
Liljenquist, David
Ozer, Kerem
Prakasam, Gnanagurudasan
Tsimikas, Athena
Wahlen, Jack
description Objective Prior to the Continuous Monitoring and Control of Hypoglycaemia (COACH) study described herein, no study had been powered to evaluate the impact of non‐adjunctive RT‐CGM use on the rate of debilitating moderate or severe hypoglycaemic events. Research Design and Methods In this 12‐month observational study, adults with insulin‐requiring diabetes who were new to RT‐CGM participated in a 6‐month control phase where insulin dosing decisions were based on self monitoring of blood glucose values, followed by a 6‐month phase where decisions were based on RT‐CGM data (i.e. non‐adjunctive RT‐CGM use); recommendations for RT‐CGM use were made according to sites' usual care. The primary outcome was change in debilitating moderate (requiring second‐party assistance) and severe (resulting in seizures or loss of consciousness) hypoglycaemic event frequency. Secondary outcomes included changes in HbA1c and diabetic ketoacidosis (DKA) frequency. Results A total of 519 participants with mean (SD) age 50.3 (16.1) years and baseline HbA1c 8.0% (1.4%) completed the study, of whom 32.8% had impaired hypoglycaemia awareness and 33.5% had type 2 diabetes (T2D). The mean (SE) per‐patient frequency of hypoglycaemic events decreased by 63% from 0.08 (0.016) during the SMBG phase to 0.03 (0.010) during the RT‐CGM phase (p = 0.005). HbA1c decreased during the RT‐CGM phase both for participants with type 1 diabetes (T1D) and T2D and there was a trend towards larger reductions among individuals with higher baseline HbA1c. Conclusions Among adults with insulin‐requiring diabetes, non‐adjunctive use of RT‐CGM data is safe, resulting in significantly fewer debilitating hypoglycaemic events than management using SMBG.
doi_str_mv 10.1111/dme.14739
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_9299719</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2618496118</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4439-591d0923f618603ad2fae8490096bfa0250bf11aa6b4d88aea5630e3b564bdff3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kcFuFSEUhomxsdfqwhcwJG7axbQwMMzgwqS51rZJtYnRNWFm4JYbBqYwXDM7N-59Rp9Ebm_bqIlsTgjf-c9_-AF4hdExzuekH9QxpjXhT8ACU0aLinL8FCxQTcuCoBrvg-cxrhHCJSf8GdgntK4aTMsF-PHJu1_ff8p-nVw3mY2CnXeTccmnCFc2dT4qOHhnJh-MW0Htwx0RvIVew5t59Cs7d1INRsLD5fXp8uLoLfysYrJT3BISjj5O2xHjGPxG5rY2qrCRk_Eu3-KU-vkF2NPSRvXyvh6Arx_Oviwviqvr88vl6VXRUUp4UXHcI14SzXDDEJF9qaVqKEeIs1ZLVFao1RhLyVraN41UsmIEKdJWjLa91uQAvNvpjqkdVN-pvIi0YgxmkGEWXhrx94szN2LlN4KXnNeYZ4HDe4Hgb5OKkxhM7JS10qn8Y6KsOKMs-6kz-uYfdO1TyCtnKvunnGHcZOpoR3XBxxiUfjSDkdiGK3K44i7czL7-0_0j-ZBmBk52wDdj1fx_JfH-49lO8jfFJ7NG</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2618496118</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Non‐adjunctive continuous glucose monitoring for control of hypoglycaemia (COACH): Results of a post‐approval observational study</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete</source><creator>Beck, Stayce E. ; Kelly, Colleen ; Price, David A. ; Aronoff, Stephen ; Bao, Shichun ; Bhargava, Anuj ; Biggs, William ; Billings, Liana ; Blevins, Thomas ; Bode, Bruce W ; Carlson, Anders ; Castorino, Kristin ; Fink, Raymond ; Harrison, Lindsay ; Klonoff, David ; Konigsberg, Sarah ; Lane, Wendy ; Liljenquist, David ; Ozer, Kerem ; Prakasam, Gnanagurudasan ; Tsimikas, Athena ; Wahlen, Jack</creator><creatorcontrib>Beck, Stayce E. ; Kelly, Colleen ; Price, David A. ; Aronoff, Stephen ; Bao, Shichun ; Bhargava, Anuj ; Biggs, William ; Billings, Liana ; Blevins, Thomas ; Bode, Bruce W ; Carlson, Anders ; Castorino, Kristin ; Fink, Raymond ; Harrison, Lindsay ; Klonoff, David ; Konigsberg, Sarah ; Lane, Wendy ; Liljenquist, David ; Ozer, Kerem ; Prakasam, Gnanagurudasan ; Tsimikas, Athena ; Wahlen, Jack ; COACH Study Group ; for the COACH Study Group</creatorcontrib><description>Objective Prior to the Continuous Monitoring and Control of Hypoglycaemia (COACH) study described herein, no study had been powered to evaluate the impact of non‐adjunctive RT‐CGM use on the rate of debilitating moderate or severe hypoglycaemic events. Research Design and Methods In this 12‐month observational study, adults with insulin‐requiring diabetes who were new to RT‐CGM participated in a 6‐month control phase where insulin dosing decisions were based on self monitoring of blood glucose values, followed by a 6‐month phase where decisions were based on RT‐CGM data (i.e. non‐adjunctive RT‐CGM use); recommendations for RT‐CGM use were made according to sites' usual care. The primary outcome was change in debilitating moderate (requiring second‐party assistance) and severe (resulting in seizures or loss of consciousness) hypoglycaemic event frequency. Secondary outcomes included changes in HbA1c and diabetic ketoacidosis (DKA) frequency. Results A total of 519 participants with mean (SD) age 50.3 (16.1) years and baseline HbA1c 8.0% (1.4%) completed the study, of whom 32.8% had impaired hypoglycaemia awareness and 33.5% had type 2 diabetes (T2D). The mean (SE) per‐patient frequency of hypoglycaemic events decreased by 63% from 0.08 (0.016) during the SMBG phase to 0.03 (0.010) during the RT‐CGM phase (p = 0.005). HbA1c decreased during the RT‐CGM phase both for participants with type 1 diabetes (T1D) and T2D and there was a trend towards larger reductions among individuals with higher baseline HbA1c. Conclusions Among adults with insulin‐requiring diabetes, non‐adjunctive use of RT‐CGM data is safe, resulting in significantly fewer debilitating hypoglycaemic events than management using SMBG.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0742-3071</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1464-5491</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1111/dme.14739</identifier><identifier>PMID: 34758142</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>England: Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</publisher><subject>Adolescent ; Adult ; Aged ; Aged, 80 and over ; Blood glucose ; Blood Glucose Self-Monitoring - methods ; COACH ; continuous glucose monitoring ; Diabetes ; Diabetes mellitus (insulin dependent) ; Diabetes mellitus (non-insulin dependent) ; Diabetic ketoacidosis ; Female ; Follow-Up Studies ; Glucose monitoring ; Glycated Hemoglobin A - analysis ; Humans ; Hypoglycemia ; Hypoglycemia - blood ; Hypoglycemia - diagnosis ; Insulin ; Ketoacidosis ; Male ; Middle Aged ; Monitoring, Ambulatory - methods ; Observational studies ; Prospective Studies ; Research: Care Delivery ; Seizures ; severe hypoglycaemia ; Young Adult</subject><ispartof>Diabetic medicine, 2022-02, Vol.39 (2), p.e14739-n/a</ispartof><rights>2021 The Authors. published by John Wiley &amp; Sons Ltd on behalf of Diabetes UK.</rights><rights>2021 The Authors. Diabetic Medicine published by John Wiley &amp; Sons Ltd on behalf of Diabetes UK.</rights><rights>2021. This article is published under http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4439-591d0923f618603ad2fae8490096bfa0250bf11aa6b4d88aea5630e3b564bdff3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4439-591d0923f618603ad2fae8490096bfa0250bf11aa6b4d88aea5630e3b564bdff3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1111%2Fdme.14739$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111%2Fdme.14739$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,776,780,881,1411,27901,27902,45550,45551</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34758142$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Beck, Stayce E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kelly, Colleen</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Price, David A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Aronoff, Stephen</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bao, Shichun</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bhargava, Anuj</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Biggs, William</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Billings, Liana</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Blevins, Thomas</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bode, Bruce W</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Carlson, Anders</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Castorino, Kristin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fink, Raymond</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Harrison, Lindsay</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Klonoff, David</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Konigsberg, Sarah</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lane, Wendy</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Liljenquist, David</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ozer, Kerem</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Prakasam, Gnanagurudasan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tsimikas, Athena</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wahlen, Jack</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>COACH Study Group</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>for the COACH Study Group</creatorcontrib><title>Non‐adjunctive continuous glucose monitoring for control of hypoglycaemia (COACH): Results of a post‐approval observational study</title><title>Diabetic medicine</title><addtitle>Diabet Med</addtitle><description>Objective Prior to the Continuous Monitoring and Control of Hypoglycaemia (COACH) study described herein, no study had been powered to evaluate the impact of non‐adjunctive RT‐CGM use on the rate of debilitating moderate or severe hypoglycaemic events. Research Design and Methods In this 12‐month observational study, adults with insulin‐requiring diabetes who were new to RT‐CGM participated in a 6‐month control phase where insulin dosing decisions were based on self monitoring of blood glucose values, followed by a 6‐month phase where decisions were based on RT‐CGM data (i.e. non‐adjunctive RT‐CGM use); recommendations for RT‐CGM use were made according to sites' usual care. The primary outcome was change in debilitating moderate (requiring second‐party assistance) and severe (resulting in seizures or loss of consciousness) hypoglycaemic event frequency. Secondary outcomes included changes in HbA1c and diabetic ketoacidosis (DKA) frequency. Results A total of 519 participants with mean (SD) age 50.3 (16.1) years and baseline HbA1c 8.0% (1.4%) completed the study, of whom 32.8% had impaired hypoglycaemia awareness and 33.5% had type 2 diabetes (T2D). The mean (SE) per‐patient frequency of hypoglycaemic events decreased by 63% from 0.08 (0.016) during the SMBG phase to 0.03 (0.010) during the RT‐CGM phase (p = 0.005). HbA1c decreased during the RT‐CGM phase both for participants with type 1 diabetes (T1D) and T2D and there was a trend towards larger reductions among individuals with higher baseline HbA1c. Conclusions Among adults with insulin‐requiring diabetes, non‐adjunctive use of RT‐CGM data is safe, resulting in significantly fewer debilitating hypoglycaemic events than management using SMBG.</description><subject>Adolescent</subject><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Aged</subject><subject>Aged, 80 and over</subject><subject>Blood glucose</subject><subject>Blood Glucose Self-Monitoring - methods</subject><subject>COACH</subject><subject>continuous glucose monitoring</subject><subject>Diabetes</subject><subject>Diabetes mellitus (insulin dependent)</subject><subject>Diabetes mellitus (non-insulin dependent)</subject><subject>Diabetic ketoacidosis</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Follow-Up Studies</subject><subject>Glucose monitoring</subject><subject>Glycated Hemoglobin A - analysis</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Hypoglycemia</subject><subject>Hypoglycemia - blood</subject><subject>Hypoglycemia - diagnosis</subject><subject>Insulin</subject><subject>Ketoacidosis</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Monitoring, Ambulatory - methods</subject><subject>Observational studies</subject><subject>Prospective Studies</subject><subject>Research: Care Delivery</subject><subject>Seizures</subject><subject>severe hypoglycaemia</subject><subject>Young Adult</subject><issn>0742-3071</issn><issn>1464-5491</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2022</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>24P</sourceid><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNp1kcFuFSEUhomxsdfqwhcwJG7axbQwMMzgwqS51rZJtYnRNWFm4JYbBqYwXDM7N-59Rp9Ebm_bqIlsTgjf-c9_-AF4hdExzuekH9QxpjXhT8ACU0aLinL8FCxQTcuCoBrvg-cxrhHCJSf8GdgntK4aTMsF-PHJu1_ff8p-nVw3mY2CnXeTccmnCFc2dT4qOHhnJh-MW0Htwx0RvIVew5t59Cs7d1INRsLD5fXp8uLoLfysYrJT3BISjj5O2xHjGPxG5rY2qrCRk_Eu3-KU-vkF2NPSRvXyvh6Arx_Oviwviqvr88vl6VXRUUp4UXHcI14SzXDDEJF9qaVqKEeIs1ZLVFao1RhLyVraN41UsmIEKdJWjLa91uQAvNvpjqkdVN-pvIi0YgxmkGEWXhrx94szN2LlN4KXnNeYZ4HDe4Hgb5OKkxhM7JS10qn8Y6KsOKMs-6kz-uYfdO1TyCtnKvunnGHcZOpoR3XBxxiUfjSDkdiGK3K44i7czL7-0_0j-ZBmBk52wDdj1fx_JfH-49lO8jfFJ7NG</recordid><startdate>202202</startdate><enddate>202202</enddate><creator>Beck, Stayce E.</creator><creator>Kelly, Colleen</creator><creator>Price, David A.</creator><creator>Aronoff, Stephen</creator><creator>Bao, Shichun</creator><creator>Bhargava, Anuj</creator><creator>Biggs, William</creator><creator>Billings, Liana</creator><creator>Blevins, Thomas</creator><creator>Bode, Bruce W</creator><creator>Carlson, Anders</creator><creator>Castorino, Kristin</creator><creator>Fink, Raymond</creator><creator>Harrison, Lindsay</creator><creator>Klonoff, David</creator><creator>Konigsberg, Sarah</creator><creator>Lane, Wendy</creator><creator>Liljenquist, David</creator><creator>Ozer, Kerem</creator><creator>Prakasam, Gnanagurudasan</creator><creator>Tsimikas, Athena</creator><creator>Wahlen, Jack</creator><general>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</general><general>John Wiley and Sons Inc</general><scope>24P</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7T5</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>H94</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>RC3</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope></search><sort><creationdate>202202</creationdate><title>Non‐adjunctive continuous glucose monitoring for control of hypoglycaemia (COACH): Results of a post‐approval observational study</title><author>Beck, Stayce E. ; Kelly, Colleen ; Price, David A. ; Aronoff, Stephen ; Bao, Shichun ; Bhargava, Anuj ; Biggs, William ; Billings, Liana ; Blevins, Thomas ; Bode, Bruce W ; Carlson, Anders ; Castorino, Kristin ; Fink, Raymond ; Harrison, Lindsay ; Klonoff, David ; Konigsberg, Sarah ; Lane, Wendy ; Liljenquist, David ; Ozer, Kerem ; Prakasam, Gnanagurudasan ; Tsimikas, Athena ; Wahlen, Jack</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4439-591d0923f618603ad2fae8490096bfa0250bf11aa6b4d88aea5630e3b564bdff3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2022</creationdate><topic>Adolescent</topic><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Aged</topic><topic>Aged, 80 and over</topic><topic>Blood glucose</topic><topic>Blood Glucose Self-Monitoring - methods</topic><topic>COACH</topic><topic>continuous glucose monitoring</topic><topic>Diabetes</topic><topic>Diabetes mellitus (insulin dependent)</topic><topic>Diabetes mellitus (non-insulin dependent)</topic><topic>Diabetic ketoacidosis</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Follow-Up Studies</topic><topic>Glucose monitoring</topic><topic>Glycated Hemoglobin A - analysis</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Hypoglycemia</topic><topic>Hypoglycemia - blood</topic><topic>Hypoglycemia - diagnosis</topic><topic>Insulin</topic><topic>Ketoacidosis</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Monitoring, Ambulatory - methods</topic><topic>Observational studies</topic><topic>Prospective Studies</topic><topic>Research: Care Delivery</topic><topic>Seizures</topic><topic>severe hypoglycaemia</topic><topic>Young Adult</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Beck, Stayce E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kelly, Colleen</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Price, David A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Aronoff, Stephen</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bao, Shichun</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bhargava, Anuj</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Biggs, William</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Billings, Liana</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Blevins, Thomas</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bode, Bruce W</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Carlson, Anders</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Castorino, Kristin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fink, Raymond</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Harrison, Lindsay</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Klonoff, David</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Konigsberg, Sarah</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lane, Wendy</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Liljenquist, David</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ozer, Kerem</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Prakasam, Gnanagurudasan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tsimikas, Athena</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wahlen, Jack</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>COACH Study Group</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>for the COACH Study Group</creatorcontrib><collection>Wiley Online Library Open Access</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Immunology Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Genetics Abstracts</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>Diabetic medicine</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Beck, Stayce E.</au><au>Kelly, Colleen</au><au>Price, David A.</au><au>Aronoff, Stephen</au><au>Bao, Shichun</au><au>Bhargava, Anuj</au><au>Biggs, William</au><au>Billings, Liana</au><au>Blevins, Thomas</au><au>Bode, Bruce W</au><au>Carlson, Anders</au><au>Castorino, Kristin</au><au>Fink, Raymond</au><au>Harrison, Lindsay</au><au>Klonoff, David</au><au>Konigsberg, Sarah</au><au>Lane, Wendy</au><au>Liljenquist, David</au><au>Ozer, Kerem</au><au>Prakasam, Gnanagurudasan</au><au>Tsimikas, Athena</au><au>Wahlen, Jack</au><aucorp>COACH Study Group</aucorp><aucorp>for the COACH Study Group</aucorp><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Non‐adjunctive continuous glucose monitoring for control of hypoglycaemia (COACH): Results of a post‐approval observational study</atitle><jtitle>Diabetic medicine</jtitle><addtitle>Diabet Med</addtitle><date>2022-02</date><risdate>2022</risdate><volume>39</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>e14739</spage><epage>n/a</epage><pages>e14739-n/a</pages><issn>0742-3071</issn><eissn>1464-5491</eissn><abstract>Objective Prior to the Continuous Monitoring and Control of Hypoglycaemia (COACH) study described herein, no study had been powered to evaluate the impact of non‐adjunctive RT‐CGM use on the rate of debilitating moderate or severe hypoglycaemic events. Research Design and Methods In this 12‐month observational study, adults with insulin‐requiring diabetes who were new to RT‐CGM participated in a 6‐month control phase where insulin dosing decisions were based on self monitoring of blood glucose values, followed by a 6‐month phase where decisions were based on RT‐CGM data (i.e. non‐adjunctive RT‐CGM use); recommendations for RT‐CGM use were made according to sites' usual care. The primary outcome was change in debilitating moderate (requiring second‐party assistance) and severe (resulting in seizures or loss of consciousness) hypoglycaemic event frequency. Secondary outcomes included changes in HbA1c and diabetic ketoacidosis (DKA) frequency. Results A total of 519 participants with mean (SD) age 50.3 (16.1) years and baseline HbA1c 8.0% (1.4%) completed the study, of whom 32.8% had impaired hypoglycaemia awareness and 33.5% had type 2 diabetes (T2D). The mean (SE) per‐patient frequency of hypoglycaemic events decreased by 63% from 0.08 (0.016) during the SMBG phase to 0.03 (0.010) during the RT‐CGM phase (p = 0.005). HbA1c decreased during the RT‐CGM phase both for participants with type 1 diabetes (T1D) and T2D and there was a trend towards larger reductions among individuals with higher baseline HbA1c. Conclusions Among adults with insulin‐requiring diabetes, non‐adjunctive use of RT‐CGM data is safe, resulting in significantly fewer debilitating hypoglycaemic events than management using SMBG.</abstract><cop>England</cop><pub>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</pub><pmid>34758142</pmid><doi>10.1111/dme.14739</doi><tpages>10</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0742-3071
ispartof Diabetic medicine, 2022-02, Vol.39 (2), p.e14739-n/a
issn 0742-3071
1464-5491
language eng
recordid cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_9299719
source MEDLINE; Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete
subjects Adolescent
Adult
Aged
Aged, 80 and over
Blood glucose
Blood Glucose Self-Monitoring - methods
COACH
continuous glucose monitoring
Diabetes
Diabetes mellitus (insulin dependent)
Diabetes mellitus (non-insulin dependent)
Diabetic ketoacidosis
Female
Follow-Up Studies
Glucose monitoring
Glycated Hemoglobin A - analysis
Humans
Hypoglycemia
Hypoglycemia - blood
Hypoglycemia - diagnosis
Insulin
Ketoacidosis
Male
Middle Aged
Monitoring, Ambulatory - methods
Observational studies
Prospective Studies
Research: Care Delivery
Seizures
severe hypoglycaemia
Young Adult
title Non‐adjunctive continuous glucose monitoring for control of hypoglycaemia (COACH): Results of a post‐approval observational study
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-02T09%3A52%3A40IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Non%E2%80%90adjunctive%20continuous%20glucose%20monitoring%20for%20control%20of%20hypoglycaemia%20(COACH):%20Results%20of%20a%20post%E2%80%90approval%20observational%20study&rft.jtitle=Diabetic%20medicine&rft.au=Beck,%20Stayce%20E.&rft.aucorp=COACH%20Study%20Group&rft.date=2022-02&rft.volume=39&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=e14739&rft.epage=n/a&rft.pages=e14739-n/a&rft.issn=0742-3071&rft.eissn=1464-5491&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111/dme.14739&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E2618496118%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2618496118&rft_id=info:pmid/34758142&rfr_iscdi=true