Validation of an Indirect Immunofluorescence Assay and Commercial Q Fever Enzyme-Linked Immunosorbent Assay for Use in Macropods
Kangaroos are considered to be an important reservoir of Q fever in Australia, although there is limited knowledge on the true prevalence and distribution of coxiellosis in Australian macropod populations. Serological tests serve as useful surveillance tools, but formal test validation is needed to...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Journal of clinical microbiology 2022-07, Vol.60 (7), p.e0023622-e0023622 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | e0023622 |
---|---|
container_issue | 7 |
container_start_page | e0023622 |
container_title | Journal of clinical microbiology |
container_volume | 60 |
creator | Tolpinrud, Anita Stenos, John Chaber, Anne-Lise Devlin, Joanne M Herbert, Catherine Pas, An Dunowska, Magdalena Stevenson, Mark A Firestone, Simon M |
description | Kangaroos are considered to be an important reservoir of Q fever in Australia, although there is limited knowledge on the true prevalence and distribution of coxiellosis in Australian macropod populations. Serological tests serve as useful surveillance tools, but formal test validation is needed to be able to estimate true seroprevalence rates, and few tests have been validated to screen wildlife species for Q fever. In this study, we modified and optimized a phase-specific indirect immunofluorescence assay (IFA) for the detection of IgG antibodies against Coxiella burnetii in macropod sera. The assay was validated against the commercially available ID Screen Q fever indirect multispecies enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) kit (IDVet, Grabels, France) to estimate the diagnostic sensitivity and specificity of each assay, using Bayesian latent class analysis. A direct comparison of the two tests was performed by testing 303 serum samples from 10 macropod populations from the east coast of Australia and New Zealand. The analysis indicated that the IFA had relatively high diagnostic sensitivity (97.6% [95% credible interval [CrI], 88.0 to 99.9]) and diagnostic specificity (98.5% [95% CrI, 94.4 to 99.9]). In comparison, the ELISA had relatively poor diagnostic sensitivity (42.1% [95% CrI, 33.7 to 50.8]) and similar diagnostic specificity (99.2% [95% CrI, 96.4 to 100]) using the cutoff values recommended by the manufacturer. The estimated true seroprevalence of C. burnetii exposure in the macropod populations included in this study ranged from 0% in New Zealand and Victoria, Australia, up to 94.2% in one population from New South Wales, Australia. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1128/jcm.00236-22 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_9297833</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2672706961</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-a418t-e2dadb42679e3426f23e7ada2ea4bb015cd238c840e52b35d58ee8f3ea7088353</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kc1v1DAQxS0EoqVw44x8BIkUf8SJc0GqVi2stAghUcTNmsQT8BLbWzuptJz40zHsUsGB0xzmN2_mzSPkKWfnnAv9ajv4c8aEbCoh7pFTzjpdNQ37fJ-cMtapinPZnpBHOW8Z43Wt1ENyIlWjhOTslPz4BJOzMLsYaBwpBLoO1iUcZrr2fglxnJaYMA8YBqQXOcO-QJauoveYBgcT_UCv8BYTvQzf9x6rjQvf0B6nc0w9hvk4OMZErzNSF-g7GFLcRZsfkwcjTBmfHOsZub66_Lh6W23ev1mvLjYV1FzPFQoLtq9F03YoSxmFxBYsCIS67xlXgxVSD7pmqEQvlVUaUY8SoWVaSyXPyOuD7m7pPdriZ04wmV1yHtLeRHDm305wX82XeGs60bVayiLw_CiQ4s2CeTbelbdMEwSMSzblNNGypmt4QV8e0OIx54Tj3RrOzK_QTAnN_A7NCFHwFwccshdmG5cUyif-xz7728ad8J9E5U9XWaLD</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2672706961</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Validation of an Indirect Immunofluorescence Assay and Commercial Q Fever Enzyme-Linked Immunosorbent Assay for Use in Macropods</title><source>American Society for Microbiology</source><source>EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals</source><source>PubMed Central</source><creator>Tolpinrud, Anita ; Stenos, John ; Chaber, Anne-Lise ; Devlin, Joanne M ; Herbert, Catherine ; Pas, An ; Dunowska, Magdalena ; Stevenson, Mark A ; Firestone, Simon M</creator><contributor>Barrs, Vanessa R.</contributor><creatorcontrib>Tolpinrud, Anita ; Stenos, John ; Chaber, Anne-Lise ; Devlin, Joanne M ; Herbert, Catherine ; Pas, An ; Dunowska, Magdalena ; Stevenson, Mark A ; Firestone, Simon M ; Barrs, Vanessa R.</creatorcontrib><description>Kangaroos are considered to be an important reservoir of Q fever in Australia, although there is limited knowledge on the true prevalence and distribution of coxiellosis in Australian macropod populations. Serological tests serve as useful surveillance tools, but formal test validation is needed to be able to estimate true seroprevalence rates, and few tests have been validated to screen wildlife species for Q fever. In this study, we modified and optimized a phase-specific indirect immunofluorescence assay (IFA) for the detection of IgG antibodies against Coxiella burnetii in macropod sera. The assay was validated against the commercially available ID Screen Q fever indirect multispecies enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) kit (IDVet, Grabels, France) to estimate the diagnostic sensitivity and specificity of each assay, using Bayesian latent class analysis. A direct comparison of the two tests was performed by testing 303 serum samples from 10 macropod populations from the east coast of Australia and New Zealand. The analysis indicated that the IFA had relatively high diagnostic sensitivity (97.6% [95% credible interval [CrI], 88.0 to 99.9]) and diagnostic specificity (98.5% [95% CrI, 94.4 to 99.9]). In comparison, the ELISA had relatively poor diagnostic sensitivity (42.1% [95% CrI, 33.7 to 50.8]) and similar diagnostic specificity (99.2% [95% CrI, 96.4 to 100]) using the cutoff values recommended by the manufacturer. The estimated true seroprevalence of C. burnetii exposure in the macropod populations included in this study ranged from 0% in New Zealand and Victoria, Australia, up to 94.2% in one population from New South Wales, Australia.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0095-1137</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1098-660X</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1128/jcm.00236-22</identifier><identifier>PMID: 35652310</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: American Society for Microbiology</publisher><subject>Immunoassays ; Immunology</subject><ispartof>Journal of clinical microbiology, 2022-07, Vol.60 (7), p.e0023622-e0023622</ispartof><rights>Copyright © 2022 Tolpinrud et al.</rights><rights>Copyright © 2022 Tolpinrud et al. 2022 Tolpinrud et al.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-a418t-e2dadb42679e3426f23e7ada2ea4bb015cd238c840e52b35d58ee8f3ea7088353</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-a418t-e2dadb42679e3426f23e7ada2ea4bb015cd238c840e52b35d58ee8f3ea7088353</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-3239-1419 ; 0000-0002-5938-3013</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://journals.asm.org/doi/pdf/10.1128/jcm.00236-22$$EPDF$$P50$$Gasm2$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://journals.asm.org/doi/full/10.1128/jcm.00236-22$$EHTML$$P50$$Gasm2$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,723,776,780,881,3175,27901,27902,52726,52727,52728,53766,53768</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35652310$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><contributor>Barrs, Vanessa R.</contributor><creatorcontrib>Tolpinrud, Anita</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Stenos, John</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chaber, Anne-Lise</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Devlin, Joanne M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Herbert, Catherine</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pas, An</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dunowska, Magdalena</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Stevenson, Mark A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Firestone, Simon M</creatorcontrib><title>Validation of an Indirect Immunofluorescence Assay and Commercial Q Fever Enzyme-Linked Immunosorbent Assay for Use in Macropods</title><title>Journal of clinical microbiology</title><addtitle>J Clin Microbiol</addtitle><addtitle>J Clin Microbiol</addtitle><description>Kangaroos are considered to be an important reservoir of Q fever in Australia, although there is limited knowledge on the true prevalence and distribution of coxiellosis in Australian macropod populations. Serological tests serve as useful surveillance tools, but formal test validation is needed to be able to estimate true seroprevalence rates, and few tests have been validated to screen wildlife species for Q fever. In this study, we modified and optimized a phase-specific indirect immunofluorescence assay (IFA) for the detection of IgG antibodies against Coxiella burnetii in macropod sera. The assay was validated against the commercially available ID Screen Q fever indirect multispecies enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) kit (IDVet, Grabels, France) to estimate the diagnostic sensitivity and specificity of each assay, using Bayesian latent class analysis. A direct comparison of the two tests was performed by testing 303 serum samples from 10 macropod populations from the east coast of Australia and New Zealand. The analysis indicated that the IFA had relatively high diagnostic sensitivity (97.6% [95% credible interval [CrI], 88.0 to 99.9]) and diagnostic specificity (98.5% [95% CrI, 94.4 to 99.9]). In comparison, the ELISA had relatively poor diagnostic sensitivity (42.1% [95% CrI, 33.7 to 50.8]) and similar diagnostic specificity (99.2% [95% CrI, 96.4 to 100]) using the cutoff values recommended by the manufacturer. The estimated true seroprevalence of C. burnetii exposure in the macropod populations included in this study ranged from 0% in New Zealand and Victoria, Australia, up to 94.2% in one population from New South Wales, Australia.</description><subject>Immunoassays</subject><subject>Immunology</subject><issn>0095-1137</issn><issn>1098-660X</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2022</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp1kc1v1DAQxS0EoqVw44x8BIkUf8SJc0GqVi2stAghUcTNmsQT8BLbWzuptJz40zHsUsGB0xzmN2_mzSPkKWfnnAv9ajv4c8aEbCoh7pFTzjpdNQ37fJ-cMtapinPZnpBHOW8Z43Wt1ENyIlWjhOTslPz4BJOzMLsYaBwpBLoO1iUcZrr2fglxnJaYMA8YBqQXOcO-QJauoveYBgcT_UCv8BYTvQzf9x6rjQvf0B6nc0w9hvk4OMZErzNSF-g7GFLcRZsfkwcjTBmfHOsZub66_Lh6W23ev1mvLjYV1FzPFQoLtq9F03YoSxmFxBYsCIS67xlXgxVSD7pmqEQvlVUaUY8SoWVaSyXPyOuD7m7pPdriZ04wmV1yHtLeRHDm305wX82XeGs60bVayiLw_CiQ4s2CeTbelbdMEwSMSzblNNGypmt4QV8e0OIx54Tj3RrOzK_QTAnN_A7NCFHwFwccshdmG5cUyif-xz7728ad8J9E5U9XWaLD</recordid><startdate>20220720</startdate><enddate>20220720</enddate><creator>Tolpinrud, Anita</creator><creator>Stenos, John</creator><creator>Chaber, Anne-Lise</creator><creator>Devlin, Joanne M</creator><creator>Herbert, Catherine</creator><creator>Pas, An</creator><creator>Dunowska, Magdalena</creator><creator>Stevenson, Mark A</creator><creator>Firestone, Simon M</creator><general>American Society for Microbiology</general><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3239-1419</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5938-3013</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20220720</creationdate><title>Validation of an Indirect Immunofluorescence Assay and Commercial Q Fever Enzyme-Linked Immunosorbent Assay for Use in Macropods</title><author>Tolpinrud, Anita ; Stenos, John ; Chaber, Anne-Lise ; Devlin, Joanne M ; Herbert, Catherine ; Pas, An ; Dunowska, Magdalena ; Stevenson, Mark A ; Firestone, Simon M</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-a418t-e2dadb42679e3426f23e7ada2ea4bb015cd238c840e52b35d58ee8f3ea7088353</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2022</creationdate><topic>Immunoassays</topic><topic>Immunology</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Tolpinrud, Anita</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Stenos, John</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chaber, Anne-Lise</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Devlin, Joanne M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Herbert, Catherine</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pas, An</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dunowska, Magdalena</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Stevenson, Mark A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Firestone, Simon M</creatorcontrib><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>Journal of clinical microbiology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Tolpinrud, Anita</au><au>Stenos, John</au><au>Chaber, Anne-Lise</au><au>Devlin, Joanne M</au><au>Herbert, Catherine</au><au>Pas, An</au><au>Dunowska, Magdalena</au><au>Stevenson, Mark A</au><au>Firestone, Simon M</au><au>Barrs, Vanessa R.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Validation of an Indirect Immunofluorescence Assay and Commercial Q Fever Enzyme-Linked Immunosorbent Assay for Use in Macropods</atitle><jtitle>Journal of clinical microbiology</jtitle><stitle>J Clin Microbiol</stitle><addtitle>J Clin Microbiol</addtitle><date>2022-07-20</date><risdate>2022</risdate><volume>60</volume><issue>7</issue><spage>e0023622</spage><epage>e0023622</epage><pages>e0023622-e0023622</pages><issn>0095-1137</issn><eissn>1098-660X</eissn><abstract>Kangaroos are considered to be an important reservoir of Q fever in Australia, although there is limited knowledge on the true prevalence and distribution of coxiellosis in Australian macropod populations. Serological tests serve as useful surveillance tools, but formal test validation is needed to be able to estimate true seroprevalence rates, and few tests have been validated to screen wildlife species for Q fever. In this study, we modified and optimized a phase-specific indirect immunofluorescence assay (IFA) for the detection of IgG antibodies against Coxiella burnetii in macropod sera. The assay was validated against the commercially available ID Screen Q fever indirect multispecies enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) kit (IDVet, Grabels, France) to estimate the diagnostic sensitivity and specificity of each assay, using Bayesian latent class analysis. A direct comparison of the two tests was performed by testing 303 serum samples from 10 macropod populations from the east coast of Australia and New Zealand. The analysis indicated that the IFA had relatively high diagnostic sensitivity (97.6% [95% credible interval [CrI], 88.0 to 99.9]) and diagnostic specificity (98.5% [95% CrI, 94.4 to 99.9]). In comparison, the ELISA had relatively poor diagnostic sensitivity (42.1% [95% CrI, 33.7 to 50.8]) and similar diagnostic specificity (99.2% [95% CrI, 96.4 to 100]) using the cutoff values recommended by the manufacturer. The estimated true seroprevalence of C. burnetii exposure in the macropod populations included in this study ranged from 0% in New Zealand and Victoria, Australia, up to 94.2% in one population from New South Wales, Australia.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>American Society for Microbiology</pub><pmid>35652310</pmid><doi>10.1128/jcm.00236-22</doi><tpages>12</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3239-1419</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5938-3013</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0095-1137 |
ispartof | Journal of clinical microbiology, 2022-07, Vol.60 (7), p.e0023622-e0023622 |
issn | 0095-1137 1098-660X |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_9297833 |
source | American Society for Microbiology; EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals; PubMed Central |
subjects | Immunoassays Immunology |
title | Validation of an Indirect Immunofluorescence Assay and Commercial Q Fever Enzyme-Linked Immunosorbent Assay for Use in Macropods |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-07T10%3A11%3A10IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Validation%20of%20an%20Indirect%20Immunofluorescence%20Assay%20and%20Commercial%20Q%20Fever%20Enzyme-Linked%20Immunosorbent%20Assay%20for%20Use%20in%20Macropods&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20clinical%20microbiology&rft.au=Tolpinrud,%20Anita&rft.date=2022-07-20&rft.volume=60&rft.issue=7&rft.spage=e0023622&rft.epage=e0023622&rft.pages=e0023622-e0023622&rft.issn=0095-1137&rft.eissn=1098-660X&rft_id=info:doi/10.1128/jcm.00236-22&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E2672706961%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2672706961&rft_id=info:pmid/35652310&rfr_iscdi=true |