Validation of an Indirect Immunofluorescence Assay and Commercial Q Fever Enzyme-Linked Immunosorbent Assay for Use in Macropods

Kangaroos are considered to be an important reservoir of Q fever in Australia, although there is limited knowledge on the true prevalence and distribution of coxiellosis in Australian macropod populations. Serological tests serve as useful surveillance tools, but formal test validation is needed to...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of clinical microbiology 2022-07, Vol.60 (7), p.e0023622-e0023622
Hauptverfasser: Tolpinrud, Anita, Stenos, John, Chaber, Anne-Lise, Devlin, Joanne M, Herbert, Catherine, Pas, An, Dunowska, Magdalena, Stevenson, Mark A, Firestone, Simon M
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page e0023622
container_issue 7
container_start_page e0023622
container_title Journal of clinical microbiology
container_volume 60
creator Tolpinrud, Anita
Stenos, John
Chaber, Anne-Lise
Devlin, Joanne M
Herbert, Catherine
Pas, An
Dunowska, Magdalena
Stevenson, Mark A
Firestone, Simon M
description Kangaroos are considered to be an important reservoir of Q fever in Australia, although there is limited knowledge on the true prevalence and distribution of coxiellosis in Australian macropod populations. Serological tests serve as useful surveillance tools, but formal test validation is needed to be able to estimate true seroprevalence rates, and few tests have been validated to screen wildlife species for Q fever. In this study, we modified and optimized a phase-specific indirect immunofluorescence assay (IFA) for the detection of IgG antibodies against Coxiella burnetii in macropod sera. The assay was validated against the commercially available ID Screen Q fever indirect multispecies enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) kit (IDVet, Grabels, France) to estimate the diagnostic sensitivity and specificity of each assay, using Bayesian latent class analysis. A direct comparison of the two tests was performed by testing 303 serum samples from 10 macropod populations from the east coast of Australia and New Zealand. The analysis indicated that the IFA had relatively high diagnostic sensitivity (97.6% [95% credible interval [CrI], 88.0 to 99.9]) and diagnostic specificity (98.5% [95% CrI, 94.4 to 99.9]). In comparison, the ELISA had relatively poor diagnostic sensitivity (42.1% [95% CrI, 33.7 to 50.8]) and similar diagnostic specificity (99.2% [95% CrI, 96.4 to 100]) using the cutoff values recommended by the manufacturer. The estimated true seroprevalence of C. burnetii exposure in the macropod populations included in this study ranged from 0% in New Zealand and Victoria, Australia, up to 94.2% in one population from New South Wales, Australia.
doi_str_mv 10.1128/jcm.00236-22
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_9297833</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2672706961</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-a418t-e2dadb42679e3426f23e7ada2ea4bb015cd238c840e52b35d58ee8f3ea7088353</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kc1v1DAQxS0EoqVw44x8BIkUf8SJc0GqVi2stAghUcTNmsQT8BLbWzuptJz40zHsUsGB0xzmN2_mzSPkKWfnnAv9ajv4c8aEbCoh7pFTzjpdNQ37fJ-cMtapinPZnpBHOW8Z43Wt1ENyIlWjhOTslPz4BJOzMLsYaBwpBLoO1iUcZrr2fglxnJaYMA8YBqQXOcO-QJauoveYBgcT_UCv8BYTvQzf9x6rjQvf0B6nc0w9hvk4OMZErzNSF-g7GFLcRZsfkwcjTBmfHOsZub66_Lh6W23ev1mvLjYV1FzPFQoLtq9F03YoSxmFxBYsCIS67xlXgxVSD7pmqEQvlVUaUY8SoWVaSyXPyOuD7m7pPdriZ04wmV1yHtLeRHDm305wX82XeGs60bVayiLw_CiQ4s2CeTbelbdMEwSMSzblNNGypmt4QV8e0OIx54Tj3RrOzK_QTAnN_A7NCFHwFwccshdmG5cUyif-xz7728ad8J9E5U9XWaLD</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2672706961</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Validation of an Indirect Immunofluorescence Assay and Commercial Q Fever Enzyme-Linked Immunosorbent Assay for Use in Macropods</title><source>American Society for Microbiology</source><source>EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals</source><source>PubMed Central</source><creator>Tolpinrud, Anita ; Stenos, John ; Chaber, Anne-Lise ; Devlin, Joanne M ; Herbert, Catherine ; Pas, An ; Dunowska, Magdalena ; Stevenson, Mark A ; Firestone, Simon M</creator><contributor>Barrs, Vanessa R.</contributor><creatorcontrib>Tolpinrud, Anita ; Stenos, John ; Chaber, Anne-Lise ; Devlin, Joanne M ; Herbert, Catherine ; Pas, An ; Dunowska, Magdalena ; Stevenson, Mark A ; Firestone, Simon M ; Barrs, Vanessa R.</creatorcontrib><description>Kangaroos are considered to be an important reservoir of Q fever in Australia, although there is limited knowledge on the true prevalence and distribution of coxiellosis in Australian macropod populations. Serological tests serve as useful surveillance tools, but formal test validation is needed to be able to estimate true seroprevalence rates, and few tests have been validated to screen wildlife species for Q fever. In this study, we modified and optimized a phase-specific indirect immunofluorescence assay (IFA) for the detection of IgG antibodies against Coxiella burnetii in macropod sera. The assay was validated against the commercially available ID Screen Q fever indirect multispecies enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) kit (IDVet, Grabels, France) to estimate the diagnostic sensitivity and specificity of each assay, using Bayesian latent class analysis. A direct comparison of the two tests was performed by testing 303 serum samples from 10 macropod populations from the east coast of Australia and New Zealand. The analysis indicated that the IFA had relatively high diagnostic sensitivity (97.6% [95% credible interval [CrI], 88.0 to 99.9]) and diagnostic specificity (98.5% [95% CrI, 94.4 to 99.9]). In comparison, the ELISA had relatively poor diagnostic sensitivity (42.1% [95% CrI, 33.7 to 50.8]) and similar diagnostic specificity (99.2% [95% CrI, 96.4 to 100]) using the cutoff values recommended by the manufacturer. The estimated true seroprevalence of C. burnetii exposure in the macropod populations included in this study ranged from 0% in New Zealand and Victoria, Australia, up to 94.2% in one population from New South Wales, Australia.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0095-1137</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1098-660X</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1128/jcm.00236-22</identifier><identifier>PMID: 35652310</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: American Society for Microbiology</publisher><subject>Immunoassays ; Immunology</subject><ispartof>Journal of clinical microbiology, 2022-07, Vol.60 (7), p.e0023622-e0023622</ispartof><rights>Copyright © 2022 Tolpinrud et al.</rights><rights>Copyright © 2022 Tolpinrud et al. 2022 Tolpinrud et al.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-a418t-e2dadb42679e3426f23e7ada2ea4bb015cd238c840e52b35d58ee8f3ea7088353</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-a418t-e2dadb42679e3426f23e7ada2ea4bb015cd238c840e52b35d58ee8f3ea7088353</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-3239-1419 ; 0000-0002-5938-3013</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://journals.asm.org/doi/pdf/10.1128/jcm.00236-22$$EPDF$$P50$$Gasm2$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://journals.asm.org/doi/full/10.1128/jcm.00236-22$$EHTML$$P50$$Gasm2$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,723,776,780,881,3175,27901,27902,52726,52727,52728,53766,53768</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35652310$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><contributor>Barrs, Vanessa R.</contributor><creatorcontrib>Tolpinrud, Anita</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Stenos, John</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chaber, Anne-Lise</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Devlin, Joanne M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Herbert, Catherine</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pas, An</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dunowska, Magdalena</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Stevenson, Mark A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Firestone, Simon M</creatorcontrib><title>Validation of an Indirect Immunofluorescence Assay and Commercial Q Fever Enzyme-Linked Immunosorbent Assay for Use in Macropods</title><title>Journal of clinical microbiology</title><addtitle>J Clin Microbiol</addtitle><addtitle>J Clin Microbiol</addtitle><description>Kangaroos are considered to be an important reservoir of Q fever in Australia, although there is limited knowledge on the true prevalence and distribution of coxiellosis in Australian macropod populations. Serological tests serve as useful surveillance tools, but formal test validation is needed to be able to estimate true seroprevalence rates, and few tests have been validated to screen wildlife species for Q fever. In this study, we modified and optimized a phase-specific indirect immunofluorescence assay (IFA) for the detection of IgG antibodies against Coxiella burnetii in macropod sera. The assay was validated against the commercially available ID Screen Q fever indirect multispecies enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) kit (IDVet, Grabels, France) to estimate the diagnostic sensitivity and specificity of each assay, using Bayesian latent class analysis. A direct comparison of the two tests was performed by testing 303 serum samples from 10 macropod populations from the east coast of Australia and New Zealand. The analysis indicated that the IFA had relatively high diagnostic sensitivity (97.6% [95% credible interval [CrI], 88.0 to 99.9]) and diagnostic specificity (98.5% [95% CrI, 94.4 to 99.9]). In comparison, the ELISA had relatively poor diagnostic sensitivity (42.1% [95% CrI, 33.7 to 50.8]) and similar diagnostic specificity (99.2% [95% CrI, 96.4 to 100]) using the cutoff values recommended by the manufacturer. The estimated true seroprevalence of C. burnetii exposure in the macropod populations included in this study ranged from 0% in New Zealand and Victoria, Australia, up to 94.2% in one population from New South Wales, Australia.</description><subject>Immunoassays</subject><subject>Immunology</subject><issn>0095-1137</issn><issn>1098-660X</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2022</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp1kc1v1DAQxS0EoqVw44x8BIkUf8SJc0GqVi2stAghUcTNmsQT8BLbWzuptJz40zHsUsGB0xzmN2_mzSPkKWfnnAv9ajv4c8aEbCoh7pFTzjpdNQ37fJ-cMtapinPZnpBHOW8Z43Wt1ENyIlWjhOTslPz4BJOzMLsYaBwpBLoO1iUcZrr2fglxnJaYMA8YBqQXOcO-QJauoveYBgcT_UCv8BYTvQzf9x6rjQvf0B6nc0w9hvk4OMZErzNSF-g7GFLcRZsfkwcjTBmfHOsZub66_Lh6W23ev1mvLjYV1FzPFQoLtq9F03YoSxmFxBYsCIS67xlXgxVSD7pmqEQvlVUaUY8SoWVaSyXPyOuD7m7pPdriZ04wmV1yHtLeRHDm305wX82XeGs60bVayiLw_CiQ4s2CeTbelbdMEwSMSzblNNGypmt4QV8e0OIx54Tj3RrOzK_QTAnN_A7NCFHwFwccshdmG5cUyif-xz7728ad8J9E5U9XWaLD</recordid><startdate>20220720</startdate><enddate>20220720</enddate><creator>Tolpinrud, Anita</creator><creator>Stenos, John</creator><creator>Chaber, Anne-Lise</creator><creator>Devlin, Joanne M</creator><creator>Herbert, Catherine</creator><creator>Pas, An</creator><creator>Dunowska, Magdalena</creator><creator>Stevenson, Mark A</creator><creator>Firestone, Simon M</creator><general>American Society for Microbiology</general><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3239-1419</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5938-3013</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20220720</creationdate><title>Validation of an Indirect Immunofluorescence Assay and Commercial Q Fever Enzyme-Linked Immunosorbent Assay for Use in Macropods</title><author>Tolpinrud, Anita ; Stenos, John ; Chaber, Anne-Lise ; Devlin, Joanne M ; Herbert, Catherine ; Pas, An ; Dunowska, Magdalena ; Stevenson, Mark A ; Firestone, Simon M</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-a418t-e2dadb42679e3426f23e7ada2ea4bb015cd238c840e52b35d58ee8f3ea7088353</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2022</creationdate><topic>Immunoassays</topic><topic>Immunology</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Tolpinrud, Anita</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Stenos, John</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chaber, Anne-Lise</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Devlin, Joanne M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Herbert, Catherine</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pas, An</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dunowska, Magdalena</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Stevenson, Mark A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Firestone, Simon M</creatorcontrib><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>Journal of clinical microbiology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Tolpinrud, Anita</au><au>Stenos, John</au><au>Chaber, Anne-Lise</au><au>Devlin, Joanne M</au><au>Herbert, Catherine</au><au>Pas, An</au><au>Dunowska, Magdalena</au><au>Stevenson, Mark A</au><au>Firestone, Simon M</au><au>Barrs, Vanessa R.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Validation of an Indirect Immunofluorescence Assay and Commercial Q Fever Enzyme-Linked Immunosorbent Assay for Use in Macropods</atitle><jtitle>Journal of clinical microbiology</jtitle><stitle>J Clin Microbiol</stitle><addtitle>J Clin Microbiol</addtitle><date>2022-07-20</date><risdate>2022</risdate><volume>60</volume><issue>7</issue><spage>e0023622</spage><epage>e0023622</epage><pages>e0023622-e0023622</pages><issn>0095-1137</issn><eissn>1098-660X</eissn><abstract>Kangaroos are considered to be an important reservoir of Q fever in Australia, although there is limited knowledge on the true prevalence and distribution of coxiellosis in Australian macropod populations. Serological tests serve as useful surveillance tools, but formal test validation is needed to be able to estimate true seroprevalence rates, and few tests have been validated to screen wildlife species for Q fever. In this study, we modified and optimized a phase-specific indirect immunofluorescence assay (IFA) for the detection of IgG antibodies against Coxiella burnetii in macropod sera. The assay was validated against the commercially available ID Screen Q fever indirect multispecies enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) kit (IDVet, Grabels, France) to estimate the diagnostic sensitivity and specificity of each assay, using Bayesian latent class analysis. A direct comparison of the two tests was performed by testing 303 serum samples from 10 macropod populations from the east coast of Australia and New Zealand. The analysis indicated that the IFA had relatively high diagnostic sensitivity (97.6% [95% credible interval [CrI], 88.0 to 99.9]) and diagnostic specificity (98.5% [95% CrI, 94.4 to 99.9]). In comparison, the ELISA had relatively poor diagnostic sensitivity (42.1% [95% CrI, 33.7 to 50.8]) and similar diagnostic specificity (99.2% [95% CrI, 96.4 to 100]) using the cutoff values recommended by the manufacturer. The estimated true seroprevalence of C. burnetii exposure in the macropod populations included in this study ranged from 0% in New Zealand and Victoria, Australia, up to 94.2% in one population from New South Wales, Australia.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>American Society for Microbiology</pub><pmid>35652310</pmid><doi>10.1128/jcm.00236-22</doi><tpages>12</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3239-1419</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5938-3013</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0095-1137
ispartof Journal of clinical microbiology, 2022-07, Vol.60 (7), p.e0023622-e0023622
issn 0095-1137
1098-660X
language eng
recordid cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_9297833
source American Society for Microbiology; EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals; PubMed Central
subjects Immunoassays
Immunology
title Validation of an Indirect Immunofluorescence Assay and Commercial Q Fever Enzyme-Linked Immunosorbent Assay for Use in Macropods
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-07T10%3A11%3A10IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Validation%20of%20an%20Indirect%20Immunofluorescence%20Assay%20and%20Commercial%20Q%20Fever%20Enzyme-Linked%20Immunosorbent%20Assay%20for%20Use%20in%20Macropods&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20clinical%20microbiology&rft.au=Tolpinrud,%20Anita&rft.date=2022-07-20&rft.volume=60&rft.issue=7&rft.spage=e0023622&rft.epage=e0023622&rft.pages=e0023622-e0023622&rft.issn=0095-1137&rft.eissn=1098-660X&rft_id=info:doi/10.1128/jcm.00236-22&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E2672706961%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2672706961&rft_id=info:pmid/35652310&rfr_iscdi=true