Mental and social wellbeing and the UK coronavirus job retention scheme: Evidence from nine longitudinal studies

The COVID-19 pandemic has led to major economic disruptions. In March 2020, the UK implemented the Coronavirus Job Retention Scheme – known as furlough – to minimize the impact of job losses. We investigate associations between change in employment status and mental and social wellbeing during the e...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Social science & medicine (1982) 2022-09, Vol.308, p.115226-115226, Article 115226
Hauptverfasser: Jacques Wels, Booth, Charlotte, Wielgoszewska, Bożena, Green, Michael J., Di Gessa, Giorgio, Huggins, Charlotte F., Griffith, Gareth J., Kwong, Alex S.F., Bowyer, Ruth C.E., Maddock, Jane, Patalay, Praveetha, Silverwood, Richard J., Fitzsimons, Emla, Shaw, Richard, Thompson, Ellen J., Steptoe, Andrew, Hughes, Alun, Chaturvedi, Nishi, Steves, Claire J., Katikireddi, Srinivasa Vittal, Ploubidis, George B.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 115226
container_issue
container_start_page 115226
container_title Social science & medicine (1982)
container_volume 308
creator Jacques Wels
Booth, Charlotte
Wielgoszewska, Bożena
Green, Michael J.
Di Gessa, Giorgio
Huggins, Charlotte F.
Griffith, Gareth J.
Kwong, Alex S.F.
Bowyer, Ruth C.E.
Maddock, Jane
Patalay, Praveetha
Silverwood, Richard J.
Fitzsimons, Emla
Shaw, Richard
Thompson, Ellen J.
Steptoe, Andrew
Hughes, Alun
Chaturvedi, Nishi
Steves, Claire J.
Katikireddi, Srinivasa Vittal
Ploubidis, George B.
description The COVID-19 pandemic has led to major economic disruptions. In March 2020, the UK implemented the Coronavirus Job Retention Scheme – known as furlough – to minimize the impact of job losses. We investigate associations between change in employment status and mental and social wellbeing during the early stages of the pandemic. Data were from 25,670 respondents, aged 17–66, across nine UK longitudinal studies. Furlough and other employment changes were defined using employment status pre-pandemic and during the first lockdown (April–June 2020). Mental and social wellbeing outcomes included psychological distress, life satisfaction, self-rated health, social contact, and loneliness. Study-specific modified Poisson regression estimates, adjusting for socio-demographic characteristics and pre-pandemic mental and social wellbeing, were pooled using meta-analysis. Associations were also stratified by sex, age, education, and household composition. Compared to those who remained working, furloughed workers were at greater risk of psychological distress (adjusted risk ratio, ARR = 1.12; 95%CI: 0.97, 1.29), low life satisfaction (ARR = 1.14; 95%CI: 1.07, 1.22), loneliness (ARR = 1.12; 95%CI: 1.01, 1.23), and poor self-rated health (ARR = 1.26; 95%CI: 1.05, 1.50). Nevertheless, compared to furloughed workers, those who became unemployed had greater risk of psychological distress (ARR = 1.30; 95%CI: 1.12, 1.52), low life satisfaction (ARR = 1.16; 95%CI: 0.98, 1.38), and loneliness (ARR = 1.67; 95%CI: 1.08, 2.59). Effects were not uniform across all sub-groups. During the early stages of the pandemic, those furloughed had increased risk of poor mental and social wellbeing, but furloughed workers fared better than those who became unemployed, suggesting that furlough may have partly mitigated poorer outcomes. •The relationship between furlough and mental health and wellbeing is not well known.•We use 9 UK studies to assess this relationship at the early stage of the pandemic.•Furlough is associated with a slight decline in mental and social wellbeing.•However, the excess risk is smaller than for those no longer being employed.•Furlough occupies an intermediary position between employment and unemployment.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.socscimed.2022.115226
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_9296227</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0277953622005329</els_id><sourcerecordid>2699707184</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c475t-592b7f06fa50f6d016c5542e69feda958bb49095efcef47bf3b2a02fe00526be3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkU9vEzEQxS1URNPCVwAfe9ngP-t1zAGpqkpBFHGhZ8v2jhNHu3awd1P12-OQEsGJk0f2m9-M30PoHSVLSmj3frssyRUXRuiXjDC2pFQw1r1AC7qSvBG8lWdoQZiUjRK8O0cXpWwJIZSs-Ct0zoXiTHC5QLtvECczYBN7XJGhlo8wDBZCXP--nDaAH75il3KKZh_yXPA2WZxhqo0hRVzcBkb4gG_3oYfoAPucRhxDBDykuA7T3IdYseVQQHmNXnozFHjzfF6ih0-3P24-N_ff777cXN83rpViaoRiVnrSeSOI7_r6ZydEy6BTHnqjxMraVhElwDvwrbSeW2YI80CIYJ0Ffok-Hrm72VaXXN02m0HvchhNftLJBP3vSwwbvU57rZjqGJMVcPUMyOnnDGXSYyiuemMipLlo1ikliaSrtkrlUepyKiWDP42hRB_y0lt9yksf8tLHvGrn27-3PPX9CagKro8CqF7tA2RdKQeb-5DBTbpP4b9DfgGvE66M</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2699707184</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Mental and social wellbeing and the UK coronavirus job retention scheme: Evidence from nine longitudinal studies</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>ScienceDirect Journals (5 years ago - present)</source><creator>Jacques Wels ; Booth, Charlotte ; Wielgoszewska, Bożena ; Green, Michael J. ; Di Gessa, Giorgio ; Huggins, Charlotte F. ; Griffith, Gareth J. ; Kwong, Alex S.F. ; Bowyer, Ruth C.E. ; Maddock, Jane ; Patalay, Praveetha ; Silverwood, Richard J. ; Fitzsimons, Emla ; Shaw, Richard ; Thompson, Ellen J. ; Steptoe, Andrew ; Hughes, Alun ; Chaturvedi, Nishi ; Steves, Claire J. ; Katikireddi, Srinivasa Vittal ; Ploubidis, George B.</creator><creatorcontrib>Jacques Wels ; Booth, Charlotte ; Wielgoszewska, Bożena ; Green, Michael J. ; Di Gessa, Giorgio ; Huggins, Charlotte F. ; Griffith, Gareth J. ; Kwong, Alex S.F. ; Bowyer, Ruth C.E. ; Maddock, Jane ; Patalay, Praveetha ; Silverwood, Richard J. ; Fitzsimons, Emla ; Shaw, Richard ; Thompson, Ellen J. ; Steptoe, Andrew ; Hughes, Alun ; Chaturvedi, Nishi ; Steves, Claire J. ; Katikireddi, Srinivasa Vittal ; Ploubidis, George B.</creatorcontrib><description>The COVID-19 pandemic has led to major economic disruptions. In March 2020, the UK implemented the Coronavirus Job Retention Scheme – known as furlough – to minimize the impact of job losses. We investigate associations between change in employment status and mental and social wellbeing during the early stages of the pandemic. Data were from 25,670 respondents, aged 17–66, across nine UK longitudinal studies. Furlough and other employment changes were defined using employment status pre-pandemic and during the first lockdown (April–June 2020). Mental and social wellbeing outcomes included psychological distress, life satisfaction, self-rated health, social contact, and loneliness. Study-specific modified Poisson regression estimates, adjusting for socio-demographic characteristics and pre-pandemic mental and social wellbeing, were pooled using meta-analysis. Associations were also stratified by sex, age, education, and household composition. Compared to those who remained working, furloughed workers were at greater risk of psychological distress (adjusted risk ratio, ARR = 1.12; 95%CI: 0.97, 1.29), low life satisfaction (ARR = 1.14; 95%CI: 1.07, 1.22), loneliness (ARR = 1.12; 95%CI: 1.01, 1.23), and poor self-rated health (ARR = 1.26; 95%CI: 1.05, 1.50). Nevertheless, compared to furloughed workers, those who became unemployed had greater risk of psychological distress (ARR = 1.30; 95%CI: 1.12, 1.52), low life satisfaction (ARR = 1.16; 95%CI: 0.98, 1.38), and loneliness (ARR = 1.67; 95%CI: 1.08, 2.59). Effects were not uniform across all sub-groups. During the early stages of the pandemic, those furloughed had increased risk of poor mental and social wellbeing, but furloughed workers fared better than those who became unemployed, suggesting that furlough may have partly mitigated poorer outcomes. •The relationship between furlough and mental health and wellbeing is not well known.•We use 9 UK studies to assess this relationship at the early stage of the pandemic.•Furlough is associated with a slight decline in mental and social wellbeing.•However, the excess risk is smaller than for those no longer being employed.•Furlough occupies an intermediary position between employment and unemployment.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0277-9536</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1873-5347</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2022.115226</identifier><identifier>PMID: 35932537</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>England: Elsevier Ltd</publisher><subject>Communicable Disease Control ; COVID-19 ; COVID-19 - epidemiology ; Furlough ; Humans ; Longitudinal Studies ; Mental Health ; Meta-analysis ; Pandemics ; Temporary unemployment ; Unemployment ; United Kingdom - epidemiology ; Wellbeing</subject><ispartof>Social science &amp; medicine (1982), 2022-09, Vol.308, p.115226-115226, Article 115226</ispartof><rights>2022 The Authors</rights><rights>Copyright © 2022 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Ltd.. All rights reserved.</rights><rights>2022 The Authors 2022</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c475t-592b7f06fa50f6d016c5542e69feda958bb49095efcef47bf3b2a02fe00526be3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c475t-592b7f06fa50f6d016c5542e69feda958bb49095efcef47bf3b2a02fe00526be3</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-7975-4221 ; 0000-0002-7906-6066 ; 0000-0002-6941-8160 ; 0000-0001-5960-4771 ; 0000-0001-6154-1845 ; 0000-0001-7576-4070 ; 0000-0002-9292-917X ; 0000-0001-5432-5271</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0277953622005329$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,776,780,881,3537,27901,27902,65306</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35932537$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Jacques Wels</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Booth, Charlotte</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wielgoszewska, Bożena</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Green, Michael J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Di Gessa, Giorgio</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Huggins, Charlotte F.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Griffith, Gareth J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kwong, Alex S.F.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bowyer, Ruth C.E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Maddock, Jane</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Patalay, Praveetha</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Silverwood, Richard J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fitzsimons, Emla</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Shaw, Richard</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Thompson, Ellen J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Steptoe, Andrew</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hughes, Alun</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chaturvedi, Nishi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Steves, Claire J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Katikireddi, Srinivasa Vittal</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ploubidis, George B.</creatorcontrib><title>Mental and social wellbeing and the UK coronavirus job retention scheme: Evidence from nine longitudinal studies</title><title>Social science &amp; medicine (1982)</title><addtitle>Soc Sci Med</addtitle><description>The COVID-19 pandemic has led to major economic disruptions. In March 2020, the UK implemented the Coronavirus Job Retention Scheme – known as furlough – to minimize the impact of job losses. We investigate associations between change in employment status and mental and social wellbeing during the early stages of the pandemic. Data were from 25,670 respondents, aged 17–66, across nine UK longitudinal studies. Furlough and other employment changes were defined using employment status pre-pandemic and during the first lockdown (April–June 2020). Mental and social wellbeing outcomes included psychological distress, life satisfaction, self-rated health, social contact, and loneliness. Study-specific modified Poisson regression estimates, adjusting for socio-demographic characteristics and pre-pandemic mental and social wellbeing, were pooled using meta-analysis. Associations were also stratified by sex, age, education, and household composition. Compared to those who remained working, furloughed workers were at greater risk of psychological distress (adjusted risk ratio, ARR = 1.12; 95%CI: 0.97, 1.29), low life satisfaction (ARR = 1.14; 95%CI: 1.07, 1.22), loneliness (ARR = 1.12; 95%CI: 1.01, 1.23), and poor self-rated health (ARR = 1.26; 95%CI: 1.05, 1.50). Nevertheless, compared to furloughed workers, those who became unemployed had greater risk of psychological distress (ARR = 1.30; 95%CI: 1.12, 1.52), low life satisfaction (ARR = 1.16; 95%CI: 0.98, 1.38), and loneliness (ARR = 1.67; 95%CI: 1.08, 2.59). Effects were not uniform across all sub-groups. During the early stages of the pandemic, those furloughed had increased risk of poor mental and social wellbeing, but furloughed workers fared better than those who became unemployed, suggesting that furlough may have partly mitigated poorer outcomes. •The relationship between furlough and mental health and wellbeing is not well known.•We use 9 UK studies to assess this relationship at the early stage of the pandemic.•Furlough is associated with a slight decline in mental and social wellbeing.•However, the excess risk is smaller than for those no longer being employed.•Furlough occupies an intermediary position between employment and unemployment.</description><subject>Communicable Disease Control</subject><subject>COVID-19</subject><subject>COVID-19 - epidemiology</subject><subject>Furlough</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Longitudinal Studies</subject><subject>Mental Health</subject><subject>Meta-analysis</subject><subject>Pandemics</subject><subject>Temporary unemployment</subject><subject>Unemployment</subject><subject>United Kingdom - epidemiology</subject><subject>Wellbeing</subject><issn>0277-9536</issn><issn>1873-5347</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2022</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNqFkU9vEzEQxS1URNPCVwAfe9ngP-t1zAGpqkpBFHGhZ8v2jhNHu3awd1P12-OQEsGJk0f2m9-M30PoHSVLSmj3frssyRUXRuiXjDC2pFQw1r1AC7qSvBG8lWdoQZiUjRK8O0cXpWwJIZSs-Ct0zoXiTHC5QLtvECczYBN7XJGhlo8wDBZCXP--nDaAH75il3KKZh_yXPA2WZxhqo0hRVzcBkb4gG_3oYfoAPucRhxDBDykuA7T3IdYseVQQHmNXnozFHjzfF6ih0-3P24-N_ff777cXN83rpViaoRiVnrSeSOI7_r6ZydEy6BTHnqjxMraVhElwDvwrbSeW2YI80CIYJ0Ffok-Hrm72VaXXN02m0HvchhNftLJBP3vSwwbvU57rZjqGJMVcPUMyOnnDGXSYyiuemMipLlo1ikliaSrtkrlUepyKiWDP42hRB_y0lt9yksf8tLHvGrn27-3PPX9CagKro8CqF7tA2RdKQeb-5DBTbpP4b9DfgGvE66M</recordid><startdate>20220901</startdate><enddate>20220901</enddate><creator>Jacques Wels</creator><creator>Booth, Charlotte</creator><creator>Wielgoszewska, Bożena</creator><creator>Green, Michael J.</creator><creator>Di Gessa, Giorgio</creator><creator>Huggins, Charlotte F.</creator><creator>Griffith, Gareth J.</creator><creator>Kwong, Alex S.F.</creator><creator>Bowyer, Ruth C.E.</creator><creator>Maddock, Jane</creator><creator>Patalay, Praveetha</creator><creator>Silverwood, Richard J.</creator><creator>Fitzsimons, Emla</creator><creator>Shaw, Richard</creator><creator>Thompson, Ellen J.</creator><creator>Steptoe, Andrew</creator><creator>Hughes, Alun</creator><creator>Chaturvedi, Nishi</creator><creator>Steves, Claire J.</creator><creator>Katikireddi, Srinivasa Vittal</creator><creator>Ploubidis, George B.</creator><general>Elsevier Ltd</general><general>The Authors. Published by Elsevier Ltd</general><scope>6I.</scope><scope>AAFTH</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7975-4221</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7906-6066</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6941-8160</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5960-4771</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6154-1845</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7576-4070</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9292-917X</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5432-5271</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20220901</creationdate><title>Mental and social wellbeing and the UK coronavirus job retention scheme: Evidence from nine longitudinal studies</title><author>Jacques Wels ; Booth, Charlotte ; Wielgoszewska, Bożena ; Green, Michael J. ; Di Gessa, Giorgio ; Huggins, Charlotte F. ; Griffith, Gareth J. ; Kwong, Alex S.F. ; Bowyer, Ruth C.E. ; Maddock, Jane ; Patalay, Praveetha ; Silverwood, Richard J. ; Fitzsimons, Emla ; Shaw, Richard ; Thompson, Ellen J. ; Steptoe, Andrew ; Hughes, Alun ; Chaturvedi, Nishi ; Steves, Claire J. ; Katikireddi, Srinivasa Vittal ; Ploubidis, George B.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c475t-592b7f06fa50f6d016c5542e69feda958bb49095efcef47bf3b2a02fe00526be3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2022</creationdate><topic>Communicable Disease Control</topic><topic>COVID-19</topic><topic>COVID-19 - epidemiology</topic><topic>Furlough</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Longitudinal Studies</topic><topic>Mental Health</topic><topic>Meta-analysis</topic><topic>Pandemics</topic><topic>Temporary unemployment</topic><topic>Unemployment</topic><topic>United Kingdom - epidemiology</topic><topic>Wellbeing</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Jacques Wels</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Booth, Charlotte</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wielgoszewska, Bożena</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Green, Michael J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Di Gessa, Giorgio</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Huggins, Charlotte F.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Griffith, Gareth J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kwong, Alex S.F.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bowyer, Ruth C.E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Maddock, Jane</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Patalay, Praveetha</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Silverwood, Richard J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fitzsimons, Emla</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Shaw, Richard</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Thompson, Ellen J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Steptoe, Andrew</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hughes, Alun</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chaturvedi, Nishi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Steves, Claire J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Katikireddi, Srinivasa Vittal</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ploubidis, George B.</creatorcontrib><collection>ScienceDirect Open Access Titles</collection><collection>Elsevier:ScienceDirect:Open Access</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>Social science &amp; medicine (1982)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Jacques Wels</au><au>Booth, Charlotte</au><au>Wielgoszewska, Bożena</au><au>Green, Michael J.</au><au>Di Gessa, Giorgio</au><au>Huggins, Charlotte F.</au><au>Griffith, Gareth J.</au><au>Kwong, Alex S.F.</au><au>Bowyer, Ruth C.E.</au><au>Maddock, Jane</au><au>Patalay, Praveetha</au><au>Silverwood, Richard J.</au><au>Fitzsimons, Emla</au><au>Shaw, Richard</au><au>Thompson, Ellen J.</au><au>Steptoe, Andrew</au><au>Hughes, Alun</au><au>Chaturvedi, Nishi</au><au>Steves, Claire J.</au><au>Katikireddi, Srinivasa Vittal</au><au>Ploubidis, George B.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Mental and social wellbeing and the UK coronavirus job retention scheme: Evidence from nine longitudinal studies</atitle><jtitle>Social science &amp; medicine (1982)</jtitle><addtitle>Soc Sci Med</addtitle><date>2022-09-01</date><risdate>2022</risdate><volume>308</volume><spage>115226</spage><epage>115226</epage><pages>115226-115226</pages><artnum>115226</artnum><issn>0277-9536</issn><eissn>1873-5347</eissn><abstract>The COVID-19 pandemic has led to major economic disruptions. In March 2020, the UK implemented the Coronavirus Job Retention Scheme – known as furlough – to minimize the impact of job losses. We investigate associations between change in employment status and mental and social wellbeing during the early stages of the pandemic. Data were from 25,670 respondents, aged 17–66, across nine UK longitudinal studies. Furlough and other employment changes were defined using employment status pre-pandemic and during the first lockdown (April–June 2020). Mental and social wellbeing outcomes included psychological distress, life satisfaction, self-rated health, social contact, and loneliness. Study-specific modified Poisson regression estimates, adjusting for socio-demographic characteristics and pre-pandemic mental and social wellbeing, were pooled using meta-analysis. Associations were also stratified by sex, age, education, and household composition. Compared to those who remained working, furloughed workers were at greater risk of psychological distress (adjusted risk ratio, ARR = 1.12; 95%CI: 0.97, 1.29), low life satisfaction (ARR = 1.14; 95%CI: 1.07, 1.22), loneliness (ARR = 1.12; 95%CI: 1.01, 1.23), and poor self-rated health (ARR = 1.26; 95%CI: 1.05, 1.50). Nevertheless, compared to furloughed workers, those who became unemployed had greater risk of psychological distress (ARR = 1.30; 95%CI: 1.12, 1.52), low life satisfaction (ARR = 1.16; 95%CI: 0.98, 1.38), and loneliness (ARR = 1.67; 95%CI: 1.08, 2.59). Effects were not uniform across all sub-groups. During the early stages of the pandemic, those furloughed had increased risk of poor mental and social wellbeing, but furloughed workers fared better than those who became unemployed, suggesting that furlough may have partly mitigated poorer outcomes. •The relationship between furlough and mental health and wellbeing is not well known.•We use 9 UK studies to assess this relationship at the early stage of the pandemic.•Furlough is associated with a slight decline in mental and social wellbeing.•However, the excess risk is smaller than for those no longer being employed.•Furlough occupies an intermediary position between employment and unemployment.</abstract><cop>England</cop><pub>Elsevier Ltd</pub><pmid>35932537</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.socscimed.2022.115226</doi><tpages>1</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7975-4221</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7906-6066</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6941-8160</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5960-4771</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6154-1845</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7576-4070</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9292-917X</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5432-5271</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0277-9536
ispartof Social science & medicine (1982), 2022-09, Vol.308, p.115226-115226, Article 115226
issn 0277-9536
1873-5347
language eng
recordid cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_9296227
source MEDLINE; ScienceDirect Journals (5 years ago - present)
subjects Communicable Disease Control
COVID-19
COVID-19 - epidemiology
Furlough
Humans
Longitudinal Studies
Mental Health
Meta-analysis
Pandemics
Temporary unemployment
Unemployment
United Kingdom - epidemiology
Wellbeing
title Mental and social wellbeing and the UK coronavirus job retention scheme: Evidence from nine longitudinal studies
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-02T17%3A57%3A46IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Mental%20and%20social%20wellbeing%20and%20the%20UK%20coronavirus%20job%20retention%20scheme:%20Evidence%20from%20nine%20longitudinal%20studies&rft.jtitle=Social%20science%20&%20medicine%20(1982)&rft.au=Jacques%20Wels&rft.date=2022-09-01&rft.volume=308&rft.spage=115226&rft.epage=115226&rft.pages=115226-115226&rft.artnum=115226&rft.issn=0277-9536&rft.eissn=1873-5347&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.socscimed.2022.115226&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E2699707184%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2699707184&rft_id=info:pmid/35932537&rft_els_id=S0277953622005329&rfr_iscdi=true