Process of Exclusion: Inferring the Effect of Virtual Patient Care and Education on Student Satisfaction
Among the three COVID-affected groups, the T2 and T4 clerks with both virtual patients and lectures were most negative, while the T3 group, with live patients and virtual lectures, was more positive than even the pre-COVID T1. [...]students unable to interact with live patients also had more negativ...
Gespeichert in:
| Veröffentlicht in: | Academic psychiatry 2023-06, Vol.47 (3), p.332-333 |
|---|---|
| Hauptverfasser: | , , |
| Format: | Artikel |
| Sprache: | eng |
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
| Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
| container_end_page | 333 |
|---|---|
| container_issue | 3 |
| container_start_page | 332 |
| container_title | Academic psychiatry |
| container_volume | 47 |
| creator | Townsend, Mark H. Bodola, Roxane R. Capone, Erin E. |
| description | Among the three COVID-affected groups, the T2 and T4 clerks with both virtual patients and lectures were most negative, while the T3 group, with live patients and virtual lectures, was more positive than even the pre-COVID T1. [...]students unable to interact with live patients also had more negative views about experiences unrelated to patient care. [...]despite virtual lectures, T3 students were more satisfied than any other about perceived respect and the quality of faculty instruction. [...]it is the T3 clerks, fully masked, but working in-person, whose observations stand out as most positive. [...]qualitative discourse analysis supported these findings; moreover, it suggested a correlation of anxiety, critical responses, and fear around the future of their professional practice, indicating an impact on their professional identity formation. |
| doi_str_mv | 10.1007/s40596-022-01677-2 |
| format | Article |
| fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_9296116</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2692072131</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c425t-8c2f6527605962761e304eccd0e140e45949d6d889689a5b70653101236ad9ec3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kV1rFTEQhoMotlb_gBcS8MabtZPJ18YLoRyOWii0UPU2pNlsz5Y9yTHZFf33Zj21Vi8KgQkzz7wzw0vISwZvGYA-LgKkUQ0gNsCU1g0-IodMCtlo5PC4_kFgY5SGA_KslBsA4EzgU3LAZSsF0_KQbC5y8qEUmnq6_uHHuQwpvqOnsQ85D_GaTptA130f_LQgX4c8zW6kF24aQpzoyuVAXezoupt9zaVI67uc5m6pXtZM6Z1f8s_Jk96NJby4jUfky4f159Wn5uz84-nq5KzxAuXUtB57JVGr5bQaWOAggvcdBCYgCGmE6VTXtka1xskrDUpyBgy5cp0Jnh-R93vd3Xy1DZ2ve2Q32l0eti7_tMkN9t9KHDb2On23Bo1iTFWBN7cCOX2bQ5nsdig-jKOLIc3FojIIGhlnFX39H3qT5hzreRYNVopzwyuFe8rnVEoO_d0yDOxipN0baauR9reRFmvTq_tn3LX8ca4CfA-U3eJTyH9nPyD7C5jpqHw</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2922073393</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Process of Exclusion: Inferring the Effect of Virtual Patient Care and Education on Student Satisfaction</title><source>ProQuest Central Essentials</source><source>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</source><source>ProQuest Central Student</source><source>SpringerNature Journals</source><source>ProQuest Central Korea</source><source>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</source><source>ProQuest Central</source><creator>Townsend, Mark H. ; Bodola, Roxane R. ; Capone, Erin E.</creator><creatorcontrib>Townsend, Mark H. ; Bodola, Roxane R. ; Capone, Erin E.</creatorcontrib><description>Among the three COVID-affected groups, the T2 and T4 clerks with both virtual patients and lectures were most negative, while the T3 group, with live patients and virtual lectures, was more positive than even the pre-COVID T1. [...]students unable to interact with live patients also had more negative views about experiences unrelated to patient care. [...]despite virtual lectures, T3 students were more satisfied than any other about perceived respect and the quality of faculty instruction. [...]it is the T3 clerks, fully masked, but working in-person, whose observations stand out as most positive. [...]qualitative discourse analysis supported these findings; moreover, it suggested a correlation of anxiety, critical responses, and fear around the future of their professional practice, indicating an impact on their professional identity formation.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1042-9670</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1545-7230</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s40596-022-01677-2</identifier><identifier>PMID: 35854175</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Cham: Springer International Publishing</publisher><subject>Communicable Diseases ; COVID-19 ; COVID-19 and Psychiatry Education ; Curricula ; Discourse Analysis ; Distance Education ; Feedback (Response) ; Identity formation ; Lecture Method ; Letter to the Editor ; Medical Education ; Medical students ; Medicine ; Medicine & Public Health ; Natural Disasters ; Pandemics ; Patients ; Professional identity ; Professionalism ; Psychiatry ; Public speaking ; Resilience (Psychology) ; Self Actualization ; Student Attitudes ; Student Experience ; Student Satisfaction ; Teaching Methods</subject><ispartof>Academic psychiatry, 2023-06, Vol.47 (3), p.332-333</ispartof><rights>The Author(s), under exclusive licence to American Association of Chairs of Departments of Psychiatry, American Association of Directors of Psychiatric Residency Training, Association for Academic Psychiatry and Association of Directors of Medical Student Education in Psychiatry 2022</rights><rights>The Author(s), under exclusive licence to American Association of Chairs of Departments of Psychiatry, American Association of Directors of Psychiatric Residency Training, Association for Academic Psychiatry and Association of Directors of Medical Student Education in Psychiatry 2022.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c425t-8c2f6527605962761e304eccd0e140e45949d6d889689a5b70653101236ad9ec3</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-9385-4325</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/2922073393/fulltextPDF?pq-origsite=primo$$EPDF$$P50$$Gproquest$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/2922073393?pq-origsite=primo$$EHTML$$P50$$Gproquest$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,780,784,885,21388,21389,21390,21391,23256,27924,27925,33530,33531,33703,33704,33744,33745,34005,34006,34314,34315,41488,42557,43659,43787,43805,43953,44067,51319,64385,64387,64389,72469,74104,74283,74302,74473,74590</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35854175$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Townsend, Mark H.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bodola, Roxane R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Capone, Erin E.</creatorcontrib><title>Process of Exclusion: Inferring the Effect of Virtual Patient Care and Education on Student Satisfaction</title><title>Academic psychiatry</title><addtitle>Acad Psychiatry</addtitle><addtitle>Acad Psychiatry</addtitle><description>Among the three COVID-affected groups, the T2 and T4 clerks with both virtual patients and lectures were most negative, while the T3 group, with live patients and virtual lectures, was more positive than even the pre-COVID T1. [...]students unable to interact with live patients also had more negative views about experiences unrelated to patient care. [...]despite virtual lectures, T3 students were more satisfied than any other about perceived respect and the quality of faculty instruction. [...]it is the T3 clerks, fully masked, but working in-person, whose observations stand out as most positive. [...]qualitative discourse analysis supported these findings; moreover, it suggested a correlation of anxiety, critical responses, and fear around the future of their professional practice, indicating an impact on their professional identity formation.</description><subject>Communicable Diseases</subject><subject>COVID-19</subject><subject>COVID-19 and Psychiatry Education</subject><subject>Curricula</subject><subject>Discourse Analysis</subject><subject>Distance Education</subject><subject>Feedback (Response)</subject><subject>Identity formation</subject><subject>Lecture Method</subject><subject>Letter to the Editor</subject><subject>Medical Education</subject><subject>Medical students</subject><subject>Medicine</subject><subject>Medicine & Public Health</subject><subject>Natural Disasters</subject><subject>Pandemics</subject><subject>Patients</subject><subject>Professional identity</subject><subject>Professionalism</subject><subject>Psychiatry</subject><subject>Public speaking</subject><subject>Resilience (Psychology)</subject><subject>Self Actualization</subject><subject>Student Attitudes</subject><subject>Student Experience</subject><subject>Student Satisfaction</subject><subject>Teaching Methods</subject><issn>1042-9670</issn><issn>1545-7230</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2023</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kV1rFTEQhoMotlb_gBcS8MabtZPJ18YLoRyOWii0UPU2pNlsz5Y9yTHZFf33Zj21Vi8KgQkzz7wzw0vISwZvGYA-LgKkUQ0gNsCU1g0-IodMCtlo5PC4_kFgY5SGA_KslBsA4EzgU3LAZSsF0_KQbC5y8qEUmnq6_uHHuQwpvqOnsQ85D_GaTptA130f_LQgX4c8zW6kF24aQpzoyuVAXezoupt9zaVI67uc5m6pXtZM6Z1f8s_Jk96NJby4jUfky4f159Wn5uz84-nq5KzxAuXUtB57JVGr5bQaWOAggvcdBCYgCGmE6VTXtka1xskrDUpyBgy5cp0Jnh-R93vd3Xy1DZ2ve2Q32l0eti7_tMkN9t9KHDb2On23Bo1iTFWBN7cCOX2bQ5nsdig-jKOLIc3FojIIGhlnFX39H3qT5hzreRYNVopzwyuFe8rnVEoO_d0yDOxipN0baauR9reRFmvTq_tn3LX8ca4CfA-U3eJTyH9nPyD7C5jpqHw</recordid><startdate>20230601</startdate><enddate>20230601</enddate><creator>Townsend, Mark H.</creator><creator>Bodola, Roxane R.</creator><creator>Capone, Erin E.</creator><general>Springer International Publishing</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>0-V</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88B</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>88G</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ALSLI</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>CJNVE</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>M0P</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M2M</scope><scope>PQEDU</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PSYQQ</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9385-4325</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20230601</creationdate><title>Process of Exclusion: Inferring the Effect of Virtual Patient Care and Education on Student Satisfaction</title><author>Townsend, Mark H. ; Bodola, Roxane R. ; Capone, Erin E.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c425t-8c2f6527605962761e304eccd0e140e45949d6d889689a5b70653101236ad9ec3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2023</creationdate><topic>Communicable Diseases</topic><topic>COVID-19</topic><topic>COVID-19 and Psychiatry Education</topic><topic>Curricula</topic><topic>Discourse Analysis</topic><topic>Distance Education</topic><topic>Feedback (Response)</topic><topic>Identity formation</topic><topic>Lecture Method</topic><topic>Letter to the Editor</topic><topic>Medical Education</topic><topic>Medical students</topic><topic>Medicine</topic><topic>Medicine & Public Health</topic><topic>Natural Disasters</topic><topic>Pandemics</topic><topic>Patients</topic><topic>Professional identity</topic><topic>Professionalism</topic><topic>Psychiatry</topic><topic>Public speaking</topic><topic>Resilience (Psychology)</topic><topic>Self Actualization</topic><topic>Student Attitudes</topic><topic>Student Experience</topic><topic>Student Satisfaction</topic><topic>Teaching Methods</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Townsend, Mark H.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bodola, Roxane R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Capone, Erin E.</creatorcontrib><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Social Sciences Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Education Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Psychology Database (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Social Science Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>Education Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Education Database</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Psychology Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Education</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest One Psychology</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>Academic psychiatry</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Townsend, Mark H.</au><au>Bodola, Roxane R.</au><au>Capone, Erin E.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Process of Exclusion: Inferring the Effect of Virtual Patient Care and Education on Student Satisfaction</atitle><jtitle>Academic psychiatry</jtitle><stitle>Acad Psychiatry</stitle><addtitle>Acad Psychiatry</addtitle><date>2023-06-01</date><risdate>2023</risdate><volume>47</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>332</spage><epage>333</epage><pages>332-333</pages><issn>1042-9670</issn><eissn>1545-7230</eissn><abstract>Among the three COVID-affected groups, the T2 and T4 clerks with both virtual patients and lectures were most negative, while the T3 group, with live patients and virtual lectures, was more positive than even the pre-COVID T1. [...]students unable to interact with live patients also had more negative views about experiences unrelated to patient care. [...]despite virtual lectures, T3 students were more satisfied than any other about perceived respect and the quality of faculty instruction. [...]it is the T3 clerks, fully masked, but working in-person, whose observations stand out as most positive. [...]qualitative discourse analysis supported these findings; moreover, it suggested a correlation of anxiety, critical responses, and fear around the future of their professional practice, indicating an impact on their professional identity formation.</abstract><cop>Cham</cop><pub>Springer International Publishing</pub><pmid>35854175</pmid><doi>10.1007/s40596-022-01677-2</doi><tpages>2</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9385-4325</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
| fulltext | fulltext |
| identifier | ISSN: 1042-9670 |
| ispartof | Academic psychiatry, 2023-06, Vol.47 (3), p.332-333 |
| issn | 1042-9670 1545-7230 |
| language | eng |
| recordid | cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_9296116 |
| source | ProQuest Central Essentials; ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition); ProQuest Central Student; SpringerNature Journals; ProQuest Central Korea; ProQuest Central UK/Ireland; ProQuest Central |
| subjects | Communicable Diseases COVID-19 COVID-19 and Psychiatry Education Curricula Discourse Analysis Distance Education Feedback (Response) Identity formation Lecture Method Letter to the Editor Medical Education Medical students Medicine Medicine & Public Health Natural Disasters Pandemics Patients Professional identity Professionalism Psychiatry Public speaking Resilience (Psychology) Self Actualization Student Attitudes Student Experience Student Satisfaction Teaching Methods |
| title | Process of Exclusion: Inferring the Effect of Virtual Patient Care and Education on Student Satisfaction |
| url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-26T17%3A59%3A47IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Process%20of%20Exclusion:%20Inferring%20the%20Effect%20of%20Virtual%20Patient%20Care%20and%20Education%20on%20Student%20Satisfaction&rft.jtitle=Academic%20psychiatry&rft.au=Townsend,%20Mark%20H.&rft.date=2023-06-01&rft.volume=47&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=332&rft.epage=333&rft.pages=332-333&rft.issn=1042-9670&rft.eissn=1545-7230&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s40596-022-01677-2&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E2692072131%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2922073393&rft_id=info:pmid/35854175&rfr_iscdi=true |