Effects of occlusal splint therapy on opposing tooth tissues, filling materials and restorations
Background Little is known about the effect of the type of splint material, heat‐cured PMMA (HC) or chemical‐cured PMMA (CC) on the wear of opposing tooth surfaces. Objective The aim of this in vitro study was to evaluate two‐body wear of dentin, enamel, glass‐ceramic or one of four resin composites...
Gespeichert in:
| Veröffentlicht in: | Journal of oral rehabilitation 2021-10, Vol.48 (10), p.1129-1134 |
|---|---|
| Hauptverfasser: | , , , |
| Format: | Artikel |
| Sprache: | eng |
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
| Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
| container_end_page | 1134 |
|---|---|
| container_issue | 10 |
| container_start_page | 1129 |
| container_title | Journal of oral rehabilitation |
| container_volume | 48 |
| creator | Osiewicz, Magdalena A. Werner, Arie Roeters, Franciscus J. M. Kleverlaan, Cornelis J. |
| description | Background
Little is known about the effect of the type of splint material, heat‐cured PMMA (HC) or chemical‐cured PMMA (CC) on the wear of opposing tooth surfaces.
Objective
The aim of this in vitro study was to evaluate two‐body wear of dentin, enamel, glass‐ceramic or one of four resin composites when opposing splint materials, namely ProBase HC and CC.
Methods
The two‐body wear of bovine dentine, bovine enamel, glass‐ceramic IPS e.max CAD (EMAX) and four composites (Filtek Z250 [Z250], Clearfil AP‐X [AP‐X], Clearfil Majesty Posterior [CMP], Filtek Supreme XTE [FSE]) opposing three antagonists (HC and CC and stainless steel as control) were evaluated in the ACTA wear machine. In addition, all the surfaces were evaluated with scanning electron microscopy.
Results
The highest average wear was observed in the case of dentin. The lowest average wear was found EMAX. In every case—except for EMAX—the wear rate was higher with HC than with CC (all differences being statistically significant).
Conclusions
The level of wear of enamel, dentin and various resin composites was higher in contact with HC than in CC, the wear of dentin being the highest. In the case of a patient with no or little tooth wear or whose teeth are restored with composite material or glass‐ceramic, the splint HC might be preferred because of its better durability. However, when the splint is in contact with opposing dentin preservation of the dentin, CC might be the best choice.
Little is known about the effect of splint materials on the wear of tooth surfaces. Patient with little tooth wear or whose teeth are restored with composite material or glass‐ceramic a heat‐cured polymethyl methacrylate (PMMA) splint is preferred because of its better durability. However, when dentin is exposed a chemical‐cured PMMA splint might be the best choice. |
| doi_str_mv | 10.1111/joor.13235 |
| format | Article |
| fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_9291448</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2572188456</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4485-70bb1cf59e71012a4acfb63fa30e13ef8eb49c350a7da67755ead9afdef0bd0b3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kV1rFDEUhkOptOvaG3-ABHoj4tR8TObjRpBSvygsiIJ3aSZz0s2STcYko-y_N-vW0nphbgLnPDy8hxeh55Rc0PLebEKIF5QzLo7QgvJGVKyr2TFaEE5ERTv2_RQ9TWlDCOm4aE_QKa85I6xuFujmyhjQOeFgcNDazUk5nCZnfcZ5DVFNOxw8DtMUkvW3OIeQ1zjblGZIr7Gxzu3HW5UhWuUSVn7EEVIOUWUbfHqGnpgyh7O7f4m-vb_6evmxul59-HT57rrSdd2JqiXDQLURPbSUUKZqpc3QcKM4AcrBdDDUveaCqHZUTdsKAWrslRnBkGEkA1-itwfvNA9bGDX4HJWTU7RbFXcyKCsfb7xdy9vwU_aspyVCEby8E8TwoxyX5dYmDc4pD2FOkgnR8E70vC3o-T_oJszRl_MK1TLadXVhl-jVgdIxpBTB3IehRO6Lk_vi5J_iCvziYfx79G9TBaAH4Jd1sPuPSn5erb4cpL8BEROnAA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2572188456</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Effects of occlusal splint therapy on opposing tooth tissues, filling materials and restorations</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Wiley Journals</source><creator>Osiewicz, Magdalena A. ; Werner, Arie ; Roeters, Franciscus J. M. ; Kleverlaan, Cornelis J.</creator><creatorcontrib>Osiewicz, Magdalena A. ; Werner, Arie ; Roeters, Franciscus J. M. ; Kleverlaan, Cornelis J.</creatorcontrib><description>Background
Little is known about the effect of the type of splint material, heat‐cured PMMA (HC) or chemical‐cured PMMA (CC) on the wear of opposing tooth surfaces.
Objective
The aim of this in vitro study was to evaluate two‐body wear of dentin, enamel, glass‐ceramic or one of four resin composites when opposing splint materials, namely ProBase HC and CC.
Methods
The two‐body wear of bovine dentine, bovine enamel, glass‐ceramic IPS e.max CAD (EMAX) and four composites (Filtek Z250 [Z250], Clearfil AP‐X [AP‐X], Clearfil Majesty Posterior [CMP], Filtek Supreme XTE [FSE]) opposing three antagonists (HC and CC and stainless steel as control) were evaluated in the ACTA wear machine. In addition, all the surfaces were evaluated with scanning electron microscopy.
Results
The highest average wear was observed in the case of dentin. The lowest average wear was found EMAX. In every case—except for EMAX—the wear rate was higher with HC than with CC (all differences being statistically significant).
Conclusions
The level of wear of enamel, dentin and various resin composites was higher in contact with HC than in CC, the wear of dentin being the highest. In the case of a patient with no or little tooth wear or whose teeth are restored with composite material or glass‐ceramic, the splint HC might be preferred because of its better durability. However, when the splint is in contact with opposing dentin preservation of the dentin, CC might be the best choice.
Little is known about the effect of splint materials on the wear of tooth surfaces. Patient with little tooth wear or whose teeth are restored with composite material or glass‐ceramic a heat‐cured polymethyl methacrylate (PMMA) splint is preferred because of its better durability. However, when dentin is exposed a chemical‐cured PMMA splint might be the best choice.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0305-182X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1365-2842</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1111/joor.13235</identifier><identifier>PMID: 34320246</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>England: Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</publisher><subject>Animals ; Antagonists ; attrition ; bruxism ; Cattle ; Composite materials ; Composite Resins ; Dental Enamel ; Dental Restoration Wear ; Dentin ; Enamel ; Humans ; Materials Testing ; Occlusal Splints ; Original ; PMMA ; Polymethylmethacrylate ; Scanning electron microscopy ; splint ; Stainless steel ; Statistical analysis ; Surface Properties ; Teeth ; tooth wear ; Tooth Wear - therapy</subject><ispartof>Journal of oral rehabilitation, 2021-10, Vol.48 (10), p.1129-1134</ispartof><rights>2021 The Authors. published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.</rights><rights>2021 The Authors. Journal of Oral Rehabilitation published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.</rights><rights>2021. This article is published under http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4485-70bb1cf59e71012a4acfb63fa30e13ef8eb49c350a7da67755ead9afdef0bd0b3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4485-70bb1cf59e71012a4acfb63fa30e13ef8eb49c350a7da67755ead9afdef0bd0b3</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-8108-4546</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1111%2Fjoor.13235$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111%2Fjoor.13235$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,780,784,885,1417,27924,27925,45574,45575</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34320246$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Osiewicz, Magdalena A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Werner, Arie</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Roeters, Franciscus J. M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kleverlaan, Cornelis J.</creatorcontrib><title>Effects of occlusal splint therapy on opposing tooth tissues, filling materials and restorations</title><title>Journal of oral rehabilitation</title><addtitle>J Oral Rehabil</addtitle><description>Background
Little is known about the effect of the type of splint material, heat‐cured PMMA (HC) or chemical‐cured PMMA (CC) on the wear of opposing tooth surfaces.
Objective
The aim of this in vitro study was to evaluate two‐body wear of dentin, enamel, glass‐ceramic or one of four resin composites when opposing splint materials, namely ProBase HC and CC.
Methods
The two‐body wear of bovine dentine, bovine enamel, glass‐ceramic IPS e.max CAD (EMAX) and four composites (Filtek Z250 [Z250], Clearfil AP‐X [AP‐X], Clearfil Majesty Posterior [CMP], Filtek Supreme XTE [FSE]) opposing three antagonists (HC and CC and stainless steel as control) were evaluated in the ACTA wear machine. In addition, all the surfaces were evaluated with scanning electron microscopy.
Results
The highest average wear was observed in the case of dentin. The lowest average wear was found EMAX. In every case—except for EMAX—the wear rate was higher with HC than with CC (all differences being statistically significant).
Conclusions
The level of wear of enamel, dentin and various resin composites was higher in contact with HC than in CC, the wear of dentin being the highest. In the case of a patient with no or little tooth wear or whose teeth are restored with composite material or glass‐ceramic, the splint HC might be preferred because of its better durability. However, when the splint is in contact with opposing dentin preservation of the dentin, CC might be the best choice.
Little is known about the effect of splint materials on the wear of tooth surfaces. Patient with little tooth wear or whose teeth are restored with composite material or glass‐ceramic a heat‐cured polymethyl methacrylate (PMMA) splint is preferred because of its better durability. However, when dentin is exposed a chemical‐cured PMMA splint might be the best choice.</description><subject>Animals</subject><subject>Antagonists</subject><subject>attrition</subject><subject>bruxism</subject><subject>Cattle</subject><subject>Composite materials</subject><subject>Composite Resins</subject><subject>Dental Enamel</subject><subject>Dental Restoration Wear</subject><subject>Dentin</subject><subject>Enamel</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Materials Testing</subject><subject>Occlusal Splints</subject><subject>Original</subject><subject>PMMA</subject><subject>Polymethylmethacrylate</subject><subject>Scanning electron microscopy</subject><subject>splint</subject><subject>Stainless steel</subject><subject>Statistical analysis</subject><subject>Surface Properties</subject><subject>Teeth</subject><subject>tooth wear</subject><subject>Tooth Wear - therapy</subject><issn>0305-182X</issn><issn>1365-2842</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2021</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>24P</sourceid><sourceid>WIN</sourceid><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kV1rFDEUhkOptOvaG3-ABHoj4tR8TObjRpBSvygsiIJ3aSZz0s2STcYko-y_N-vW0nphbgLnPDy8hxeh55Rc0PLebEKIF5QzLo7QgvJGVKyr2TFaEE5ERTv2_RQ9TWlDCOm4aE_QKa85I6xuFujmyhjQOeFgcNDazUk5nCZnfcZ5DVFNOxw8DtMUkvW3OIeQ1zjblGZIr7Gxzu3HW5UhWuUSVn7EEVIOUWUbfHqGnpgyh7O7f4m-vb_6evmxul59-HT57rrSdd2JqiXDQLURPbSUUKZqpc3QcKM4AcrBdDDUveaCqHZUTdsKAWrslRnBkGEkA1-itwfvNA9bGDX4HJWTU7RbFXcyKCsfb7xdy9vwU_aspyVCEby8E8TwoxyX5dYmDc4pD2FOkgnR8E70vC3o-T_oJszRl_MK1TLadXVhl-jVgdIxpBTB3IehRO6Lk_vi5J_iCvziYfx79G9TBaAH4Jd1sPuPSn5erb4cpL8BEROnAA</recordid><startdate>202110</startdate><enddate>202110</enddate><creator>Osiewicz, Magdalena A.</creator><creator>Werner, Arie</creator><creator>Roeters, Franciscus J. M.</creator><creator>Kleverlaan, Cornelis J.</creator><general>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</general><general>John Wiley and Sons Inc</general><scope>24P</scope><scope>WIN</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QP</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8108-4546</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>202110</creationdate><title>Effects of occlusal splint therapy on opposing tooth tissues, filling materials and restorations</title><author>Osiewicz, Magdalena A. ; Werner, Arie ; Roeters, Franciscus J. M. ; Kleverlaan, Cornelis J.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4485-70bb1cf59e71012a4acfb63fa30e13ef8eb49c350a7da67755ead9afdef0bd0b3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2021</creationdate><topic>Animals</topic><topic>Antagonists</topic><topic>attrition</topic><topic>bruxism</topic><topic>Cattle</topic><topic>Composite materials</topic><topic>Composite Resins</topic><topic>Dental Enamel</topic><topic>Dental Restoration Wear</topic><topic>Dentin</topic><topic>Enamel</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Materials Testing</topic><topic>Occlusal Splints</topic><topic>Original</topic><topic>PMMA</topic><topic>Polymethylmethacrylate</topic><topic>Scanning electron microscopy</topic><topic>splint</topic><topic>Stainless steel</topic><topic>Statistical analysis</topic><topic>Surface Properties</topic><topic>Teeth</topic><topic>tooth wear</topic><topic>Tooth Wear - therapy</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Osiewicz, Magdalena A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Werner, Arie</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Roeters, Franciscus J. M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kleverlaan, Cornelis J.</creatorcontrib><collection>Wiley Online Library (Open Access Collection)</collection><collection>Wiley Online Library Free Content</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Calcium & Calcified Tissue Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>Journal of oral rehabilitation</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Osiewicz, Magdalena A.</au><au>Werner, Arie</au><au>Roeters, Franciscus J. M.</au><au>Kleverlaan, Cornelis J.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Effects of occlusal splint therapy on opposing tooth tissues, filling materials and restorations</atitle><jtitle>Journal of oral rehabilitation</jtitle><addtitle>J Oral Rehabil</addtitle><date>2021-10</date><risdate>2021</risdate><volume>48</volume><issue>10</issue><spage>1129</spage><epage>1134</epage><pages>1129-1134</pages><issn>0305-182X</issn><eissn>1365-2842</eissn><abstract>Background
Little is known about the effect of the type of splint material, heat‐cured PMMA (HC) or chemical‐cured PMMA (CC) on the wear of opposing tooth surfaces.
Objective
The aim of this in vitro study was to evaluate two‐body wear of dentin, enamel, glass‐ceramic or one of four resin composites when opposing splint materials, namely ProBase HC and CC.
Methods
The two‐body wear of bovine dentine, bovine enamel, glass‐ceramic IPS e.max CAD (EMAX) and four composites (Filtek Z250 [Z250], Clearfil AP‐X [AP‐X], Clearfil Majesty Posterior [CMP], Filtek Supreme XTE [FSE]) opposing three antagonists (HC and CC and stainless steel as control) were evaluated in the ACTA wear machine. In addition, all the surfaces were evaluated with scanning electron microscopy.
Results
The highest average wear was observed in the case of dentin. The lowest average wear was found EMAX. In every case—except for EMAX—the wear rate was higher with HC than with CC (all differences being statistically significant).
Conclusions
The level of wear of enamel, dentin and various resin composites was higher in contact with HC than in CC, the wear of dentin being the highest. In the case of a patient with no or little tooth wear or whose teeth are restored with composite material or glass‐ceramic, the splint HC might be preferred because of its better durability. However, when the splint is in contact with opposing dentin preservation of the dentin, CC might be the best choice.
Little is known about the effect of splint materials on the wear of tooth surfaces. Patient with little tooth wear or whose teeth are restored with composite material or glass‐ceramic a heat‐cured polymethyl methacrylate (PMMA) splint is preferred because of its better durability. However, when dentin is exposed a chemical‐cured PMMA splint might be the best choice.</abstract><cop>England</cop><pub>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</pub><pmid>34320246</pmid><doi>10.1111/joor.13235</doi><tpages>6</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8108-4546</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
| fulltext | fulltext |
| identifier | ISSN: 0305-182X |
| ispartof | Journal of oral rehabilitation, 2021-10, Vol.48 (10), p.1129-1134 |
| issn | 0305-182X 1365-2842 |
| language | eng |
| recordid | cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_9291448 |
| source | MEDLINE; Wiley Journals |
| subjects | Animals Antagonists attrition bruxism Cattle Composite materials Composite Resins Dental Enamel Dental Restoration Wear Dentin Enamel Humans Materials Testing Occlusal Splints Original PMMA Polymethylmethacrylate Scanning electron microscopy splint Stainless steel Statistical analysis Surface Properties Teeth tooth wear Tooth Wear - therapy |
| title | Effects of occlusal splint therapy on opposing tooth tissues, filling materials and restorations |
| url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-26T04%3A12%3A52IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Effects%20of%20occlusal%20splint%20therapy%20on%20opposing%20tooth%20tissues,%20filling%20materials%20and%20restorations&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20oral%20rehabilitation&rft.au=Osiewicz,%20Magdalena%20A.&rft.date=2021-10&rft.volume=48&rft.issue=10&rft.spage=1129&rft.epage=1134&rft.pages=1129-1134&rft.issn=0305-182X&rft.eissn=1365-2842&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111/joor.13235&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E2572188456%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2572188456&rft_id=info:pmid/34320246&rfr_iscdi=true |