Healthcare stakeholders' perspective on barriers to integrated care in Switzerland: Results from the open‐ended question of a nationwide survey
Objective We aimed to identify the main barriers to integrated care (IC) as reported by healthcare stakeholders from various linguistic regions and health system specificities, according to their reality of practice. Methods Information was gathered through an open‐ended question from a national sur...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Journal of evaluation in clinical practice 2022-02, Vol.28 (1), p.129-134 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 134 |
---|---|
container_issue | 1 |
container_start_page | 129 |
container_title | Journal of evaluation in clinical practice |
container_volume | 28 |
creator | Rawlinson, Cloé Lesage, Saphir Gilles, Ingrid Peytremann‐Bridevaux, Isabelle |
description | Objective
We aimed to identify the main barriers to integrated care (IC) as reported by healthcare stakeholders from various linguistic regions and health system specificities, according to their reality of practice.
Methods
Information was gathered through an open‐ended question from a national survey conducted in Switzerland in 2019. Responses were analysed qualitatively with the IRaMuTeQ software.
Results
Answers from 410 respondents were obtained. Respondents reported barriers at two levels: the system and professional level. Threat to financial benefits, concerns for patient data sharing and tensions between quality of care and benefits for patients versus costs were mentioned at the professional level, in their activity and in patient care. At the system level, limitations at the political level due to federalism and the lack of support and training for professionals were important barriers, in addition to the lack of recognition and compensation for professionals and the fragmented functioning of the health care system.
Conclusion
Our study underlines the importance of implementing innovative funding strategies and reimbursement schemes, as well as political willingness to move towards IC. The alignment between federal policies and cantonal specificities also appears as necessary to achieve involvement of professionals, promote integration of services and coordination of professionals for continuous and efficient care. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1111/jep.13605 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_9291149</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2619499888</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4435-1ed6c75d17c937fffd931d2a84f99d4a01af05fd39c632536d002964135c43343</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1Uctu1DAUjRCIPmDBDyBLLCiLtPEribtAQlWhoEogHmvLta87HjJ2sJ0ZDSs-AX6RL8EzUypAwgvfK_uccx-nqh7h5hiXczKH8RjTtuF3qv0SeU06Tu9uct7WmAi2Vx2kNG8aTBve3a_2KKOk6_p-v_pxAWrIM60ioJTVZ5iFwUBMT9FY7hF0dktAwaMrFaMrTygH5HyG66gyGLQlOo8-rFz-CnFQ3pyi95CmISdkY1igPCv8EfzPb9_Bm0L5MkHKrkgGixTyapOvnCn1p7iE9YPqnlVDgoc38bD69PL849lFffn21euzF5e1ZozyGoNpdccN7rSgnbXWCIoNUT2zQhimGqxsw62hQreUcNqapiGiZWUnmtGygMPq-U53nK4WYDT4HNUgx-gWKq5lUE7-_ePdTF6HpRREYMxEETi6EYhhO5NcuKRhKDuAMCVJOO8IJX23qfXkH-g8TNGX8SRpsWBC9H1fUM92KB1DShHsbTO4kRujZTFabo0u2Md_dn-L_O1sAZzsACs3wPr_SvLN-bud5C9DfLZd</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2619499888</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Healthcare stakeholders' perspective on barriers to integrated care in Switzerland: Results from the open‐ended question of a nationwide survey</title><source>Wiley-Blackwell Journals</source><source>MEDLINE</source><creator>Rawlinson, Cloé ; Lesage, Saphir ; Gilles, Ingrid ; Peytremann‐Bridevaux, Isabelle</creator><creatorcontrib>Rawlinson, Cloé ; Lesage, Saphir ; Gilles, Ingrid ; Peytremann‐Bridevaux, Isabelle</creatorcontrib><description>Objective
We aimed to identify the main barriers to integrated care (IC) as reported by healthcare stakeholders from various linguistic regions and health system specificities, according to their reality of practice.
Methods
Information was gathered through an open‐ended question from a national survey conducted in Switzerland in 2019. Responses were analysed qualitatively with the IRaMuTeQ software.
Results
Answers from 410 respondents were obtained. Respondents reported barriers at two levels: the system and professional level. Threat to financial benefits, concerns for patient data sharing and tensions between quality of care and benefits for patients versus costs were mentioned at the professional level, in their activity and in patient care. At the system level, limitations at the political level due to federalism and the lack of support and training for professionals were important barriers, in addition to the lack of recognition and compensation for professionals and the fragmented functioning of the health care system.
Conclusion
Our study underlines the importance of implementing innovative funding strategies and reimbursement schemes, as well as political willingness to move towards IC. The alignment between federal policies and cantonal specificities also appears as necessary to achieve involvement of professionals, promote integration of services and coordination of professionals for continuous and efficient care.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1356-1294</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1365-2753</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1111/jep.13605</identifier><identifier>PMID: 34327788</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Chichester, UK: John Wiley & Sons, Inc</publisher><subject>barriers ; Brief Report ; Continuity of care ; Delivery of Health Care, Integrated ; healthcare stakeholders ; Humans ; Information sharing ; integrated care ; Integrated delivery systems ; Medical personnel ; Medical records ; Policy ; Stakeholders ; Surveys and Questionnaires ; Switzerland</subject><ispartof>Journal of evaluation in clinical practice, 2022-02, Vol.28 (1), p.129-134</ispartof><rights>2021 The Authors. published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.</rights><rights>2021 The Authors. Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.</rights><rights>2021. This article is published under http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4435-1ed6c75d17c937fffd931d2a84f99d4a01af05fd39c632536d002964135c43343</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4435-1ed6c75d17c937fffd931d2a84f99d4a01af05fd39c632536d002964135c43343</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-6514-8781 ; 0000-0003-2051-4749 ; 0000-0002-7210-0049</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1111%2Fjep.13605$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111%2Fjep.13605$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,777,781,882,1412,27905,27906,45555,45556</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34327788$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Rawlinson, Cloé</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lesage, Saphir</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gilles, Ingrid</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Peytremann‐Bridevaux, Isabelle</creatorcontrib><title>Healthcare stakeholders' perspective on barriers to integrated care in Switzerland: Results from the open‐ended question of a nationwide survey</title><title>Journal of evaluation in clinical practice</title><addtitle>J Eval Clin Pract</addtitle><description>Objective
We aimed to identify the main barriers to integrated care (IC) as reported by healthcare stakeholders from various linguistic regions and health system specificities, according to their reality of practice.
Methods
Information was gathered through an open‐ended question from a national survey conducted in Switzerland in 2019. Responses were analysed qualitatively with the IRaMuTeQ software.
Results
Answers from 410 respondents were obtained. Respondents reported barriers at two levels: the system and professional level. Threat to financial benefits, concerns for patient data sharing and tensions between quality of care and benefits for patients versus costs were mentioned at the professional level, in their activity and in patient care. At the system level, limitations at the political level due to federalism and the lack of support and training for professionals were important barriers, in addition to the lack of recognition and compensation for professionals and the fragmented functioning of the health care system.
Conclusion
Our study underlines the importance of implementing innovative funding strategies and reimbursement schemes, as well as political willingness to move towards IC. The alignment between federal policies and cantonal specificities also appears as necessary to achieve involvement of professionals, promote integration of services and coordination of professionals for continuous and efficient care.</description><subject>barriers</subject><subject>Brief Report</subject><subject>Continuity of care</subject><subject>Delivery of Health Care, Integrated</subject><subject>healthcare stakeholders</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Information sharing</subject><subject>integrated care</subject><subject>Integrated delivery systems</subject><subject>Medical personnel</subject><subject>Medical records</subject><subject>Policy</subject><subject>Stakeholders</subject><subject>Surveys and Questionnaires</subject><subject>Switzerland</subject><issn>1356-1294</issn><issn>1365-2753</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2022</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>24P</sourceid><sourceid>WIN</sourceid><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNp1Uctu1DAUjRCIPmDBDyBLLCiLtPEribtAQlWhoEogHmvLta87HjJ2sJ0ZDSs-AX6RL8EzUypAwgvfK_uccx-nqh7h5hiXczKH8RjTtuF3qv0SeU06Tu9uct7WmAi2Vx2kNG8aTBve3a_2KKOk6_p-v_pxAWrIM60ioJTVZ5iFwUBMT9FY7hF0dktAwaMrFaMrTygH5HyG66gyGLQlOo8-rFz-CnFQ3pyi95CmISdkY1igPCv8EfzPb9_Bm0L5MkHKrkgGixTyapOvnCn1p7iE9YPqnlVDgoc38bD69PL849lFffn21euzF5e1ZozyGoNpdccN7rSgnbXWCIoNUT2zQhimGqxsw62hQreUcNqapiGiZWUnmtGygMPq-U53nK4WYDT4HNUgx-gWKq5lUE7-_ePdTF6HpRREYMxEETi6EYhhO5NcuKRhKDuAMCVJOO8IJX23qfXkH-g8TNGX8SRpsWBC9H1fUM92KB1DShHsbTO4kRujZTFabo0u2Md_dn-L_O1sAZzsACs3wPr_SvLN-bud5C9DfLZd</recordid><startdate>202202</startdate><enddate>202202</enddate><creator>Rawlinson, Cloé</creator><creator>Lesage, Saphir</creator><creator>Gilles, Ingrid</creator><creator>Peytremann‐Bridevaux, Isabelle</creator><general>John Wiley & Sons, Inc</general><general>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</general><scope>24P</scope><scope>WIN</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>ASE</scope><scope>FPQ</scope><scope>K6X</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6514-8781</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2051-4749</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7210-0049</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>202202</creationdate><title>Healthcare stakeholders' perspective on barriers to integrated care in Switzerland: Results from the open‐ended question of a nationwide survey</title><author>Rawlinson, Cloé ; Lesage, Saphir ; Gilles, Ingrid ; Peytremann‐Bridevaux, Isabelle</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4435-1ed6c75d17c937fffd931d2a84f99d4a01af05fd39c632536d002964135c43343</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2022</creationdate><topic>barriers</topic><topic>Brief Report</topic><topic>Continuity of care</topic><topic>Delivery of Health Care, Integrated</topic><topic>healthcare stakeholders</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Information sharing</topic><topic>integrated care</topic><topic>Integrated delivery systems</topic><topic>Medical personnel</topic><topic>Medical records</topic><topic>Policy</topic><topic>Stakeholders</topic><topic>Surveys and Questionnaires</topic><topic>Switzerland</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Rawlinson, Cloé</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lesage, Saphir</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gilles, Ingrid</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Peytremann‐Bridevaux, Isabelle</creatorcontrib><collection>Wiley-Blackwell Open Access Collection</collection><collection>Wiley Free Archive</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>British Nursing Index</collection><collection>British Nursing Index (BNI) (1985 to Present)</collection><collection>British Nursing Index</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>Journal of evaluation in clinical practice</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Rawlinson, Cloé</au><au>Lesage, Saphir</au><au>Gilles, Ingrid</au><au>Peytremann‐Bridevaux, Isabelle</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Healthcare stakeholders' perspective on barriers to integrated care in Switzerland: Results from the open‐ended question of a nationwide survey</atitle><jtitle>Journal of evaluation in clinical practice</jtitle><addtitle>J Eval Clin Pract</addtitle><date>2022-02</date><risdate>2022</risdate><volume>28</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>129</spage><epage>134</epage><pages>129-134</pages><issn>1356-1294</issn><eissn>1365-2753</eissn><abstract>Objective
We aimed to identify the main barriers to integrated care (IC) as reported by healthcare stakeholders from various linguistic regions and health system specificities, according to their reality of practice.
Methods
Information was gathered through an open‐ended question from a national survey conducted in Switzerland in 2019. Responses were analysed qualitatively with the IRaMuTeQ software.
Results
Answers from 410 respondents were obtained. Respondents reported barriers at two levels: the system and professional level. Threat to financial benefits, concerns for patient data sharing and tensions between quality of care and benefits for patients versus costs were mentioned at the professional level, in their activity and in patient care. At the system level, limitations at the political level due to federalism and the lack of support and training for professionals were important barriers, in addition to the lack of recognition and compensation for professionals and the fragmented functioning of the health care system.
Conclusion
Our study underlines the importance of implementing innovative funding strategies and reimbursement schemes, as well as political willingness to move towards IC. The alignment between federal policies and cantonal specificities also appears as necessary to achieve involvement of professionals, promote integration of services and coordination of professionals for continuous and efficient care.</abstract><cop>Chichester, UK</cop><pub>John Wiley & Sons, Inc</pub><pmid>34327788</pmid><doi>10.1111/jep.13605</doi><tpages>6</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6514-8781</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2051-4749</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7210-0049</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1356-1294 |
ispartof | Journal of evaluation in clinical practice, 2022-02, Vol.28 (1), p.129-134 |
issn | 1356-1294 1365-2753 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_9291149 |
source | Wiley-Blackwell Journals; MEDLINE |
subjects | barriers Brief Report Continuity of care Delivery of Health Care, Integrated healthcare stakeholders Humans Information sharing integrated care Integrated delivery systems Medical personnel Medical records Policy Stakeholders Surveys and Questionnaires Switzerland |
title | Healthcare stakeholders' perspective on barriers to integrated care in Switzerland: Results from the open‐ended question of a nationwide survey |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-17T18%3A18%3A08IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Healthcare%20stakeholders'%20perspective%20on%20barriers%20to%20integrated%20care%20in%20Switzerland:%20Results%20from%20the%20open%E2%80%90ended%20question%20of%20a%20nationwide%20survey&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20evaluation%20in%20clinical%20practice&rft.au=Rawlinson,%20Clo%C3%A9&rft.date=2022-02&rft.volume=28&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=129&rft.epage=134&rft.pages=129-134&rft.issn=1356-1294&rft.eissn=1365-2753&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111/jep.13605&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E2619499888%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2619499888&rft_id=info:pmid/34327788&rfr_iscdi=true |