Healthcare stakeholders' perspective on barriers to integrated care in Switzerland: Results from the open‐ended question of a nationwide survey

Objective We aimed to identify the main barriers to integrated care (IC) as reported by healthcare stakeholders from various linguistic regions and health system specificities, according to their reality of practice. Methods Information was gathered through an open‐ended question from a national sur...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of evaluation in clinical practice 2022-02, Vol.28 (1), p.129-134
Hauptverfasser: Rawlinson, Cloé, Lesage, Saphir, Gilles, Ingrid, Peytremann‐Bridevaux, Isabelle
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 134
container_issue 1
container_start_page 129
container_title Journal of evaluation in clinical practice
container_volume 28
creator Rawlinson, Cloé
Lesage, Saphir
Gilles, Ingrid
Peytremann‐Bridevaux, Isabelle
description Objective We aimed to identify the main barriers to integrated care (IC) as reported by healthcare stakeholders from various linguistic regions and health system specificities, according to their reality of practice. Methods Information was gathered through an open‐ended question from a national survey conducted in Switzerland in 2019. Responses were analysed qualitatively with the IRaMuTeQ software. Results Answers from 410 respondents were obtained. Respondents reported barriers at two levels: the system and professional level. Threat to financial benefits, concerns for patient data sharing and tensions between quality of care and benefits for patients versus costs were mentioned at the professional level, in their activity and in patient care. At the system level, limitations at the political level due to federalism and the lack of support and training for professionals were important barriers, in addition to the lack of recognition and compensation for professionals and the fragmented functioning of the health care system. Conclusion Our study underlines the importance of implementing innovative funding strategies and reimbursement schemes, as well as political willingness to move towards IC. The alignment between federal policies and cantonal specificities also appears as necessary to achieve involvement of professionals, promote integration of services and coordination of professionals for continuous and efficient care.
doi_str_mv 10.1111/jep.13605
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_9291149</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2619499888</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4435-1ed6c75d17c937fffd931d2a84f99d4a01af05fd39c632536d002964135c43343</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1Uctu1DAUjRCIPmDBDyBLLCiLtPEribtAQlWhoEogHmvLta87HjJ2sJ0ZDSs-AX6RL8EzUypAwgvfK_uccx-nqh7h5hiXczKH8RjTtuF3qv0SeU06Tu9uct7WmAi2Vx2kNG8aTBve3a_2KKOk6_p-v_pxAWrIM60ioJTVZ5iFwUBMT9FY7hF0dktAwaMrFaMrTygH5HyG66gyGLQlOo8-rFz-CnFQ3pyi95CmISdkY1igPCv8EfzPb9_Bm0L5MkHKrkgGixTyapOvnCn1p7iE9YPqnlVDgoc38bD69PL849lFffn21euzF5e1ZozyGoNpdccN7rSgnbXWCIoNUT2zQhimGqxsw62hQreUcNqapiGiZWUnmtGygMPq-U53nK4WYDT4HNUgx-gWKq5lUE7-_ePdTF6HpRREYMxEETi6EYhhO5NcuKRhKDuAMCVJOO8IJX23qfXkH-g8TNGX8SRpsWBC9H1fUM92KB1DShHsbTO4kRujZTFabo0u2Md_dn-L_O1sAZzsACs3wPr_SvLN-bud5C9DfLZd</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2619499888</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Healthcare stakeholders' perspective on barriers to integrated care in Switzerland: Results from the open‐ended question of a nationwide survey</title><source>Wiley-Blackwell Journals</source><source>MEDLINE</source><creator>Rawlinson, Cloé ; Lesage, Saphir ; Gilles, Ingrid ; Peytremann‐Bridevaux, Isabelle</creator><creatorcontrib>Rawlinson, Cloé ; Lesage, Saphir ; Gilles, Ingrid ; Peytremann‐Bridevaux, Isabelle</creatorcontrib><description>Objective We aimed to identify the main barriers to integrated care (IC) as reported by healthcare stakeholders from various linguistic regions and health system specificities, according to their reality of practice. Methods Information was gathered through an open‐ended question from a national survey conducted in Switzerland in 2019. Responses were analysed qualitatively with the IRaMuTeQ software. Results Answers from 410 respondents were obtained. Respondents reported barriers at two levels: the system and professional level. Threat to financial benefits, concerns for patient data sharing and tensions between quality of care and benefits for patients versus costs were mentioned at the professional level, in their activity and in patient care. At the system level, limitations at the political level due to federalism and the lack of support and training for professionals were important barriers, in addition to the lack of recognition and compensation for professionals and the fragmented functioning of the health care system. Conclusion Our study underlines the importance of implementing innovative funding strategies and reimbursement schemes, as well as political willingness to move towards IC. The alignment between federal policies and cantonal specificities also appears as necessary to achieve involvement of professionals, promote integration of services and coordination of professionals for continuous and efficient care.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1356-1294</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1365-2753</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1111/jep.13605</identifier><identifier>PMID: 34327788</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Chichester, UK: John Wiley &amp; Sons, Inc</publisher><subject>barriers ; Brief Report ; Continuity of care ; Delivery of Health Care, Integrated ; healthcare stakeholders ; Humans ; Information sharing ; integrated care ; Integrated delivery systems ; Medical personnel ; Medical records ; Policy ; Stakeholders ; Surveys and Questionnaires ; Switzerland</subject><ispartof>Journal of evaluation in clinical practice, 2022-02, Vol.28 (1), p.129-134</ispartof><rights>2021 The Authors. published by John Wiley &amp; Sons Ltd.</rights><rights>2021 The Authors. Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice published by John Wiley &amp; Sons Ltd.</rights><rights>2021. This article is published under http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4435-1ed6c75d17c937fffd931d2a84f99d4a01af05fd39c632536d002964135c43343</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4435-1ed6c75d17c937fffd931d2a84f99d4a01af05fd39c632536d002964135c43343</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-6514-8781 ; 0000-0003-2051-4749 ; 0000-0002-7210-0049</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1111%2Fjep.13605$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111%2Fjep.13605$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,777,781,882,1412,27905,27906,45555,45556</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34327788$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Rawlinson, Cloé</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lesage, Saphir</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gilles, Ingrid</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Peytremann‐Bridevaux, Isabelle</creatorcontrib><title>Healthcare stakeholders' perspective on barriers to integrated care in Switzerland: Results from the open‐ended question of a nationwide survey</title><title>Journal of evaluation in clinical practice</title><addtitle>J Eval Clin Pract</addtitle><description>Objective We aimed to identify the main barriers to integrated care (IC) as reported by healthcare stakeholders from various linguistic regions and health system specificities, according to their reality of practice. Methods Information was gathered through an open‐ended question from a national survey conducted in Switzerland in 2019. Responses were analysed qualitatively with the IRaMuTeQ software. Results Answers from 410 respondents were obtained. Respondents reported barriers at two levels: the system and professional level. Threat to financial benefits, concerns for patient data sharing and tensions between quality of care and benefits for patients versus costs were mentioned at the professional level, in their activity and in patient care. At the system level, limitations at the political level due to federalism and the lack of support and training for professionals were important barriers, in addition to the lack of recognition and compensation for professionals and the fragmented functioning of the health care system. Conclusion Our study underlines the importance of implementing innovative funding strategies and reimbursement schemes, as well as political willingness to move towards IC. The alignment between federal policies and cantonal specificities also appears as necessary to achieve involvement of professionals, promote integration of services and coordination of professionals for continuous and efficient care.</description><subject>barriers</subject><subject>Brief Report</subject><subject>Continuity of care</subject><subject>Delivery of Health Care, Integrated</subject><subject>healthcare stakeholders</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Information sharing</subject><subject>integrated care</subject><subject>Integrated delivery systems</subject><subject>Medical personnel</subject><subject>Medical records</subject><subject>Policy</subject><subject>Stakeholders</subject><subject>Surveys and Questionnaires</subject><subject>Switzerland</subject><issn>1356-1294</issn><issn>1365-2753</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2022</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>24P</sourceid><sourceid>WIN</sourceid><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNp1Uctu1DAUjRCIPmDBDyBLLCiLtPEribtAQlWhoEogHmvLta87HjJ2sJ0ZDSs-AX6RL8EzUypAwgvfK_uccx-nqh7h5hiXczKH8RjTtuF3qv0SeU06Tu9uct7WmAi2Vx2kNG8aTBve3a_2KKOk6_p-v_pxAWrIM60ioJTVZ5iFwUBMT9FY7hF0dktAwaMrFaMrTygH5HyG66gyGLQlOo8-rFz-CnFQ3pyi95CmISdkY1igPCv8EfzPb9_Bm0L5MkHKrkgGixTyapOvnCn1p7iE9YPqnlVDgoc38bD69PL849lFffn21euzF5e1ZozyGoNpdccN7rSgnbXWCIoNUT2zQhimGqxsw62hQreUcNqapiGiZWUnmtGygMPq-U53nK4WYDT4HNUgx-gWKq5lUE7-_ePdTF6HpRREYMxEETi6EYhhO5NcuKRhKDuAMCVJOO8IJX23qfXkH-g8TNGX8SRpsWBC9H1fUM92KB1DShHsbTO4kRujZTFabo0u2Md_dn-L_O1sAZzsACs3wPr_SvLN-bud5C9DfLZd</recordid><startdate>202202</startdate><enddate>202202</enddate><creator>Rawlinson, Cloé</creator><creator>Lesage, Saphir</creator><creator>Gilles, Ingrid</creator><creator>Peytremann‐Bridevaux, Isabelle</creator><general>John Wiley &amp; Sons, Inc</general><general>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</general><scope>24P</scope><scope>WIN</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>ASE</scope><scope>FPQ</scope><scope>K6X</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6514-8781</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2051-4749</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7210-0049</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>202202</creationdate><title>Healthcare stakeholders' perspective on barriers to integrated care in Switzerland: Results from the open‐ended question of a nationwide survey</title><author>Rawlinson, Cloé ; Lesage, Saphir ; Gilles, Ingrid ; Peytremann‐Bridevaux, Isabelle</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4435-1ed6c75d17c937fffd931d2a84f99d4a01af05fd39c632536d002964135c43343</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2022</creationdate><topic>barriers</topic><topic>Brief Report</topic><topic>Continuity of care</topic><topic>Delivery of Health Care, Integrated</topic><topic>healthcare stakeholders</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Information sharing</topic><topic>integrated care</topic><topic>Integrated delivery systems</topic><topic>Medical personnel</topic><topic>Medical records</topic><topic>Policy</topic><topic>Stakeholders</topic><topic>Surveys and Questionnaires</topic><topic>Switzerland</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Rawlinson, Cloé</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lesage, Saphir</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gilles, Ingrid</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Peytremann‐Bridevaux, Isabelle</creatorcontrib><collection>Wiley-Blackwell Open Access Collection</collection><collection>Wiley Free Archive</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>British Nursing Index</collection><collection>British Nursing Index (BNI) (1985 to Present)</collection><collection>British Nursing Index</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>Journal of evaluation in clinical practice</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Rawlinson, Cloé</au><au>Lesage, Saphir</au><au>Gilles, Ingrid</au><au>Peytremann‐Bridevaux, Isabelle</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Healthcare stakeholders' perspective on barriers to integrated care in Switzerland: Results from the open‐ended question of a nationwide survey</atitle><jtitle>Journal of evaluation in clinical practice</jtitle><addtitle>J Eval Clin Pract</addtitle><date>2022-02</date><risdate>2022</risdate><volume>28</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>129</spage><epage>134</epage><pages>129-134</pages><issn>1356-1294</issn><eissn>1365-2753</eissn><abstract>Objective We aimed to identify the main barriers to integrated care (IC) as reported by healthcare stakeholders from various linguistic regions and health system specificities, according to their reality of practice. Methods Information was gathered through an open‐ended question from a national survey conducted in Switzerland in 2019. Responses were analysed qualitatively with the IRaMuTeQ software. Results Answers from 410 respondents were obtained. Respondents reported barriers at two levels: the system and professional level. Threat to financial benefits, concerns for patient data sharing and tensions between quality of care and benefits for patients versus costs were mentioned at the professional level, in their activity and in patient care. At the system level, limitations at the political level due to federalism and the lack of support and training for professionals were important barriers, in addition to the lack of recognition and compensation for professionals and the fragmented functioning of the health care system. Conclusion Our study underlines the importance of implementing innovative funding strategies and reimbursement schemes, as well as political willingness to move towards IC. The alignment between federal policies and cantonal specificities also appears as necessary to achieve involvement of professionals, promote integration of services and coordination of professionals for continuous and efficient care.</abstract><cop>Chichester, UK</cop><pub>John Wiley &amp; Sons, Inc</pub><pmid>34327788</pmid><doi>10.1111/jep.13605</doi><tpages>6</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6514-8781</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2051-4749</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7210-0049</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1356-1294
ispartof Journal of evaluation in clinical practice, 2022-02, Vol.28 (1), p.129-134
issn 1356-1294
1365-2753
language eng
recordid cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_9291149
source Wiley-Blackwell Journals; MEDLINE
subjects barriers
Brief Report
Continuity of care
Delivery of Health Care, Integrated
healthcare stakeholders
Humans
Information sharing
integrated care
Integrated delivery systems
Medical personnel
Medical records
Policy
Stakeholders
Surveys and Questionnaires
Switzerland
title Healthcare stakeholders' perspective on barriers to integrated care in Switzerland: Results from the open‐ended question of a nationwide survey
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-17T18%3A18%3A08IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Healthcare%20stakeholders'%20perspective%20on%20barriers%20to%20integrated%20care%20in%20Switzerland:%20Results%20from%20the%20open%E2%80%90ended%20question%20of%20a%20nationwide%20survey&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20evaluation%20in%20clinical%20practice&rft.au=Rawlinson,%20Clo%C3%A9&rft.date=2022-02&rft.volume=28&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=129&rft.epage=134&rft.pages=129-134&rft.issn=1356-1294&rft.eissn=1365-2753&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111/jep.13605&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E2619499888%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2619499888&rft_id=info:pmid/34327788&rfr_iscdi=true