Treatment of mild Class II malocclusion in growing patients with clear aligners versus fixed multibracket therapy: A retrospective study
Objective To compare the dental and skeletal effects of intermaxillary elastics on the correction of mild Angle's Class II division 1 malocclusion with clear aligner treatment (CA) versus fixed multibracket (FMB) in growing patients. Settings and sample population The study sample consisted of...
Gespeichert in:
| Veröffentlicht in: | Orthodontics & craniofacial research 2022-02, Vol.25 (1), p.96-102 |
|---|---|
| Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , |
| Format: | Artikel |
| Sprache: | eng |
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
| Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
| container_end_page | 102 |
|---|---|
| container_issue | 1 |
| container_start_page | 96 |
| container_title | Orthodontics & craniofacial research |
| container_volume | 25 |
| creator | Dianiskova, Simona Rongo, Roberto Buono, Raffaele Franchi, Lorenzo Michelotti, Ambra D’Antò, Vincenzo |
| description | Objective
To compare the dental and skeletal effects of intermaxillary elastics on the correction of mild Angle's Class II division 1 malocclusion with clear aligner treatment (CA) versus fixed multibracket (FMB) in growing patients.
Settings and sample population
The study sample consisted of 49 consecutively patients (mean age ± SD 12.9 ± 1.7 years), 32 females and 17 males referred from the School of Orthodontics of the University of Bratislava Comenius (Slovakia). All patients were treated with a non‐extraction orthodontic treatment, 25 with FMB and 24 with CA.
Methods
The cephalometric analysis was performed at the beginning (T0) and the end of the treatment (T1). The t test for unpaired data was carried out to compare cephalometric values at T0 and changes at T1‐T0 between the two groups. The level of significance was set as P |
| doi_str_mv | 10.1111/ocr.12500 |
| format | Article |
| fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_9290977</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2529944222</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3580-a3bb28f03592f3ca60261483dc1245d3818881d367d596f76d10b8fb20b417f03</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kd9qFDEUh4MotlYvfAE54I292DZ_ZjITL4SyVF0oFKReh0yS2U3NTMYks-u-gY9tdOuigrlIAvnOxzn5IfSS4AtS1mXQ8YLQGuNH6JRwTBacVezx8c7qE_QspXuMKaaUP0UnrMKE8Vqcou930ao82DFD6GFw3sDSq5RgtYJB-aC1n5MLI7gR1jHs3LiGSWVXChLsXN6A9lZFUN6tRxsTbMs2J-jdN2tgmH12XVT6i82QNzaqaf8WriDaHEOarM5uayHl2eyfoye98sm-eDjP0Of313fLj4ub2w-r5dXNQrO6xQvFuo62PWa1oD3TimPKSdUyowmtasNa0rYtMYw3pha8b7ghuGv7juKuIk2pO0PvDt5p7gZrdBkkKi-n6AYV9zIoJ_9-Gd1GrsNWCiqwaJoiePMgiOHrbFOWg0vaeq9GG-YkaU2FqCpKaUFf_4PehzmOZTxJOaWNaCrGCnV-oHT5kxRtf2yGYPkzX1nylb_yLeyrP7s_kr8DLcDlAdg5b_f_N8nb5aeD8gc_ILFU</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2622797433</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Treatment of mild Class II malocclusion in growing patients with clear aligners versus fixed multibracket therapy: A retrospective study</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Wiley Online Library All Journals</source><creator>Dianiskova, Simona ; Rongo, Roberto ; Buono, Raffaele ; Franchi, Lorenzo ; Michelotti, Ambra ; D’Antò, Vincenzo</creator><creatorcontrib>Dianiskova, Simona ; Rongo, Roberto ; Buono, Raffaele ; Franchi, Lorenzo ; Michelotti, Ambra ; D’Antò, Vincenzo</creatorcontrib><description>Objective
To compare the dental and skeletal effects of intermaxillary elastics on the correction of mild Angle's Class II division 1 malocclusion with clear aligner treatment (CA) versus fixed multibracket (FMB) in growing patients.
Settings and sample population
The study sample consisted of 49 consecutively patients (mean age ± SD 12.9 ± 1.7 years), 32 females and 17 males referred from the School of Orthodontics of the University of Bratislava Comenius (Slovakia). All patients were treated with a non‐extraction orthodontic treatment, 25 with FMB and 24 with CA.
Methods
The cephalometric analysis was performed at the beginning (T0) and the end of the treatment (T1). The t test for unpaired data was carried out to compare cephalometric values at T0 and changes at T1‐T0 between the two groups. The level of significance was set as P < .0035.
Results
The two groups showed no statistically significant differences (ANPg = −0.1°; P = .762) in the correction of the sagittal intermaxillary relation. The analysis of vertical skeletal changes showed no statistically significant effects on mandibular inclination (SN/MP = 0.1°; P = .840). The two treatments had a statistically significant and clinically relevant difference in controlling the inclination of the lower incisors (L1/GoGn = 4.8°, CAG = −0.5°± 3.9°; FMB = 4.3°± 5.8°; P < .001).
Conclusions
Class II elastics combined with CA and FMB produce a similar correction on sagittal discrepancies in growing patients. CA presented a better control in the proclination of the lower incisors. CA and elastics might be a good alternative in the correction of mild Class II malocclusion in cases where a proclination of lower incisors is unwanted.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1601-6335</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1601-6343</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1111/ocr.12500</identifier><identifier>PMID: 34013659</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>England: Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</publisher><subject>adolescents ; Cephalometry ; Class II elastics ; Class II malocclusion ; clear aligners ; Dental occlusion ; Female ; Humans ; Incisors ; Male ; Malocclusion, Angle Class II - therapy ; Mandible ; Original ; Orthodontic Appliances, Removable ; Orthodontics ; Patients ; Population studies ; Retrospective Studies ; Statistical analysis ; Trinucleotide repeats</subject><ispartof>Orthodontics & craniofacial research, 2022-02, Vol.25 (1), p.96-102</ispartof><rights>2021 The Authors. published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.</rights><rights>2021 The Authors. Orthodontics & Craniofacial Research published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.</rights><rights>2021. This article is published under http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3580-a3bb28f03592f3ca60261483dc1245d3818881d367d596f76d10b8fb20b417f03</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3580-a3bb28f03592f3ca60261483dc1245d3818881d367d596f76d10b8fb20b417f03</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-9741-794X ; 0000-0002-2072-460X</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1111%2Focr.12500$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111%2Focr.12500$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,780,784,885,1417,27924,27925,45574,45575</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34013659$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Dianiskova, Simona</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rongo, Roberto</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Buono, Raffaele</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Franchi, Lorenzo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Michelotti, Ambra</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>D’Antò, Vincenzo</creatorcontrib><title>Treatment of mild Class II malocclusion in growing patients with clear aligners versus fixed multibracket therapy: A retrospective study</title><title>Orthodontics & craniofacial research</title><addtitle>Orthod Craniofac Res</addtitle><description>Objective
To compare the dental and skeletal effects of intermaxillary elastics on the correction of mild Angle's Class II division 1 malocclusion with clear aligner treatment (CA) versus fixed multibracket (FMB) in growing patients.
Settings and sample population
The study sample consisted of 49 consecutively patients (mean age ± SD 12.9 ± 1.7 years), 32 females and 17 males referred from the School of Orthodontics of the University of Bratislava Comenius (Slovakia). All patients were treated with a non‐extraction orthodontic treatment, 25 with FMB and 24 with CA.
Methods
The cephalometric analysis was performed at the beginning (T0) and the end of the treatment (T1). The t test for unpaired data was carried out to compare cephalometric values at T0 and changes at T1‐T0 between the two groups. The level of significance was set as P < .0035.
Results
The two groups showed no statistically significant differences (ANPg = −0.1°; P = .762) in the correction of the sagittal intermaxillary relation. The analysis of vertical skeletal changes showed no statistically significant effects on mandibular inclination (SN/MP = 0.1°; P = .840). The two treatments had a statistically significant and clinically relevant difference in controlling the inclination of the lower incisors (L1/GoGn = 4.8°, CAG = −0.5°± 3.9°; FMB = 4.3°± 5.8°; P < .001).
Conclusions
Class II elastics combined with CA and FMB produce a similar correction on sagittal discrepancies in growing patients. CA presented a better control in the proclination of the lower incisors. CA and elastics might be a good alternative in the correction of mild Class II malocclusion in cases where a proclination of lower incisors is unwanted.</description><subject>adolescents</subject><subject>Cephalometry</subject><subject>Class II elastics</subject><subject>Class II malocclusion</subject><subject>clear aligners</subject><subject>Dental occlusion</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Incisors</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Malocclusion, Angle Class II - therapy</subject><subject>Mandible</subject><subject>Original</subject><subject>Orthodontic Appliances, Removable</subject><subject>Orthodontics</subject><subject>Patients</subject><subject>Population studies</subject><subject>Retrospective Studies</subject><subject>Statistical analysis</subject><subject>Trinucleotide repeats</subject><issn>1601-6335</issn><issn>1601-6343</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2022</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>24P</sourceid><sourceid>WIN</sourceid><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNp1kd9qFDEUh4MotlYvfAE54I292DZ_ZjITL4SyVF0oFKReh0yS2U3NTMYks-u-gY9tdOuigrlIAvnOxzn5IfSS4AtS1mXQ8YLQGuNH6JRwTBacVezx8c7qE_QspXuMKaaUP0UnrMKE8Vqcou930ao82DFD6GFw3sDSq5RgtYJB-aC1n5MLI7gR1jHs3LiGSWVXChLsXN6A9lZFUN6tRxsTbMs2J-jdN2tgmH12XVT6i82QNzaqaf8WriDaHEOarM5uayHl2eyfoye98sm-eDjP0Of313fLj4ub2w-r5dXNQrO6xQvFuo62PWa1oD3TimPKSdUyowmtasNa0rYtMYw3pha8b7ghuGv7juKuIk2pO0PvDt5p7gZrdBkkKi-n6AYV9zIoJ_9-Gd1GrsNWCiqwaJoiePMgiOHrbFOWg0vaeq9GG-YkaU2FqCpKaUFf_4PehzmOZTxJOaWNaCrGCnV-oHT5kxRtf2yGYPkzX1nylb_yLeyrP7s_kr8DLcDlAdg5b_f_N8nb5aeD8gc_ILFU</recordid><startdate>202202</startdate><enddate>202202</enddate><creator>Dianiskova, Simona</creator><creator>Rongo, Roberto</creator><creator>Buono, Raffaele</creator><creator>Franchi, Lorenzo</creator><creator>Michelotti, Ambra</creator><creator>D’Antò, Vincenzo</creator><general>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</general><general>John Wiley and Sons Inc</general><scope>24P</scope><scope>WIN</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QP</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9741-794X</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2072-460X</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>202202</creationdate><title>Treatment of mild Class II malocclusion in growing patients with clear aligners versus fixed multibracket therapy: A retrospective study</title><author>Dianiskova, Simona ; Rongo, Roberto ; Buono, Raffaele ; Franchi, Lorenzo ; Michelotti, Ambra ; D’Antò, Vincenzo</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3580-a3bb28f03592f3ca60261483dc1245d3818881d367d596f76d10b8fb20b417f03</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2022</creationdate><topic>adolescents</topic><topic>Cephalometry</topic><topic>Class II elastics</topic><topic>Class II malocclusion</topic><topic>clear aligners</topic><topic>Dental occlusion</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Incisors</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Malocclusion, Angle Class II - therapy</topic><topic>Mandible</topic><topic>Original</topic><topic>Orthodontic Appliances, Removable</topic><topic>Orthodontics</topic><topic>Patients</topic><topic>Population studies</topic><topic>Retrospective Studies</topic><topic>Statistical analysis</topic><topic>Trinucleotide repeats</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Dianiskova, Simona</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rongo, Roberto</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Buono, Raffaele</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Franchi, Lorenzo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Michelotti, Ambra</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>D’Antò, Vincenzo</creatorcontrib><collection>Wiley Open Access</collection><collection>Wiley Online Library Free Content</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Calcium & Calcified Tissue Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>Orthodontics & craniofacial research</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Dianiskova, Simona</au><au>Rongo, Roberto</au><au>Buono, Raffaele</au><au>Franchi, Lorenzo</au><au>Michelotti, Ambra</au><au>D’Antò, Vincenzo</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Treatment of mild Class II malocclusion in growing patients with clear aligners versus fixed multibracket therapy: A retrospective study</atitle><jtitle>Orthodontics & craniofacial research</jtitle><addtitle>Orthod Craniofac Res</addtitle><date>2022-02</date><risdate>2022</risdate><volume>25</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>96</spage><epage>102</epage><pages>96-102</pages><issn>1601-6335</issn><eissn>1601-6343</eissn><abstract>Objective
To compare the dental and skeletal effects of intermaxillary elastics on the correction of mild Angle's Class II division 1 malocclusion with clear aligner treatment (CA) versus fixed multibracket (FMB) in growing patients.
Settings and sample population
The study sample consisted of 49 consecutively patients (mean age ± SD 12.9 ± 1.7 years), 32 females and 17 males referred from the School of Orthodontics of the University of Bratislava Comenius (Slovakia). All patients were treated with a non‐extraction orthodontic treatment, 25 with FMB and 24 with CA.
Methods
The cephalometric analysis was performed at the beginning (T0) and the end of the treatment (T1). The t test for unpaired data was carried out to compare cephalometric values at T0 and changes at T1‐T0 between the two groups. The level of significance was set as P < .0035.
Results
The two groups showed no statistically significant differences (ANPg = −0.1°; P = .762) in the correction of the sagittal intermaxillary relation. The analysis of vertical skeletal changes showed no statistically significant effects on mandibular inclination (SN/MP = 0.1°; P = .840). The two treatments had a statistically significant and clinically relevant difference in controlling the inclination of the lower incisors (L1/GoGn = 4.8°, CAG = −0.5°± 3.9°; FMB = 4.3°± 5.8°; P < .001).
Conclusions
Class II elastics combined with CA and FMB produce a similar correction on sagittal discrepancies in growing patients. CA presented a better control in the proclination of the lower incisors. CA and elastics might be a good alternative in the correction of mild Class II malocclusion in cases where a proclination of lower incisors is unwanted.</abstract><cop>England</cop><pub>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</pub><pmid>34013659</pmid><doi>10.1111/ocr.12500</doi><tpages>7</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9741-794X</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2072-460X</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
| fulltext | fulltext |
| identifier | ISSN: 1601-6335 |
| ispartof | Orthodontics & craniofacial research, 2022-02, Vol.25 (1), p.96-102 |
| issn | 1601-6335 1601-6343 |
| language | eng |
| recordid | cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_9290977 |
| source | MEDLINE; Wiley Online Library All Journals |
| subjects | adolescents Cephalometry Class II elastics Class II malocclusion clear aligners Dental occlusion Female Humans Incisors Male Malocclusion, Angle Class II - therapy Mandible Original Orthodontic Appliances, Removable Orthodontics Patients Population studies Retrospective Studies Statistical analysis Trinucleotide repeats |
| title | Treatment of mild Class II malocclusion in growing patients with clear aligners versus fixed multibracket therapy: A retrospective study |
| url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-28T11%3A44%3A35IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Treatment%20of%20mild%20Class%20II%20malocclusion%20in%20growing%20patients%20with%20clear%20aligners%20versus%20fixed%20multibracket%20therapy:%20A%20retrospective%20study&rft.jtitle=Orthodontics%20&%20craniofacial%20research&rft.au=Dianiskova,%20Simona&rft.date=2022-02&rft.volume=25&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=96&rft.epage=102&rft.pages=96-102&rft.issn=1601-6335&rft.eissn=1601-6343&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111/ocr.12500&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E2529944222%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2622797433&rft_id=info:pmid/34013659&rfr_iscdi=true |