Effectiveness of routine population‐wide orthoptic preschool vision screening tests at age 6–24 months in the Netherlands
Purpose The effectiveness of preverbal orthoptic tests at age 6, 9, 14 and 24 months in population‐wide screening was assessed. Methods Two consecutive birth cohorts at 134 centres were compared. At general health screening visits, children born July–December 2011 were vision screened four times bet...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Acta ophthalmologica (Oxford, England) England), 2022-02, Vol.100 (1), p.e100-e114 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | e114 |
---|---|
container_issue | 1 |
container_start_page | e100 |
container_title | Acta ophthalmologica (Oxford, England) |
container_volume | 100 |
creator | Sloot, Frea Telleman, Marieke Alberdina Johanna Benjamins, Janine Sami, Aya Hoogendam, Jacob Pieter Simonsz, Huibert Jan de Jongh‐van den Tweel, Marijke Kroon, Angelie Visser, Karin Schoonenberg, Anneke Berg, Wilma Verheij, Gerdien Lokhorst, Linda Visser, Esmeralda Slot, Xanne Dijk, Japke Scholten, Cindy Bos‐Koelewijn, Christine Graaf‐Helfensteijn, Marijke Wijkmans, Carina Sultanali, Nilofar Schouten, Jorien Boon, Linda Graaf, Alice Peeters, Mirjam Aggelen, Inge Westra‐Postma, Imke Bos, Jacqueline Evers, Hanneke Bennen, Annemiek Hoekstra, Marijke Asjes, Wijnanda Dijkers, Elfi Meppel, Isala Boer, Ruth Alteveer, Tamara Schram‐Rienstra, Dina Timmer‐de Kok, Jolanda Hoolsema‐Greving, Tineke Ketwich‐Godfroy, Friedel Steenbergen, Liesbeth Gutter, Mari Arentzen, Josine Heuveling‐Rijswijk, Marike Andel, Heleen Dijk, Marieke Lieverse, Elsa Vries, Jolanda Holweg, Tim Vries, Erik |
description | Purpose
The effectiveness of preverbal orthoptic tests at age 6, 9, 14 and 24 months in population‐wide screening was assessed.
Methods
Two consecutive birth cohorts at 134 centres were compared. At general health screening visits, children born July–December 2011 were vision screened four times between 6 and 24 months with inspection, pupillary reflexes, eye motility, Hirschberg, cover test and monocular pursuit. Children born January–June 2012 were vision screened at general screening visits only in case of visually apparent abnormalities or positive family history. After referral, cause and severity of amblyopia were determined. Visual acuity was measured in all children at 36 and 45 months.
Results
The control and intervention group comprised 5649 versus 5162 children. Amblyopia was diagnosed in 185 (3.3%) versus 159 children (3.1%), outside of screening in 21 (11.4%) versus 25 (15.7%). Between 6 and 24 months, 44 (23.8%) versus 27 (17%) (RR = 0.67 [95% CI 0.42, 1.09]) were referred and after visual acuity (VA) measurement 120 (64.9%) versus 107 (67.3%). Of 109 versus 108 children with refractive or bilateral amblyopia, 94 (86.2%) versus 92 (85.2%) were detected with VA measurements. Visual acuity of the amblyopic eye, after referral, was not significantly different between groups (p 0.896), nor was the time to amblyopia diagnosis (intention to screen [p 0.55]; per protocol [p 0.11]).
Conclusion
The effectiveness of vision screening was not influenced by omission of orthoptic tests at general health screening at 6–24 months. Refractive and bilateral amblyopia were almost exclusively found by VA measurements. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1111/aos.14859 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_9290114</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2508890595</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4439-44e98e07430f02ec8b2589af106146d2a2c30a304a7b5323a661f03c863168de3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kc1qFTEYhgdRbK0uvAEJuKmL0-Z_ko1QSv2BYhcquAs5mW_OpMxJxiRzShdCL0HwDnslpp56UMEskg_y8PC9vE3znOAjUs-xjfmIcCX0g2aftEIsWCvVw90svuw1T3K-xFgSKfnjZo8xRVqt6H7z7azvwRW_gQA5o9ijFOfiA6ApTvNoi4_h9ub7le8AxVSGOBXv0JQguyHGEW18rgTKLgEEH1aoQC4Z2YLsCpC8vflBOVrHUIaMfEBlAPQB6p1GG7r8tHnU2zHDs_v3oPn85uzT6bvF-cXb96cn5wvHOdMLzkErwC1nuMcUnFpSobTtSQ3EZUctdQxbhrltl4JRZqUkPWZOSUak6oAdNK-33mlerqFzEEqyo5mSX9t0baL15u-f4AezihujqcaE8Co4vBek-HWuEc3aZwdjTQFxzoYKrJTGQouKvvwHvYxzCjWeoZIowgnld9SrLeVSzDlBv1uGYHNXqqmlml-lVvbFn9vvyN8tVuB4C1z5Ea7_bzInFx-3yp9zo69b</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2618141245</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Effectiveness of routine population‐wide orthoptic preschool vision screening tests at age 6–24 months in the Netherlands</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete</source><source>Wiley Free Content</source><creator>Sloot, Frea ; Telleman, Marieke Alberdina Johanna ; Benjamins, Janine ; Sami, Aya ; Hoogendam, Jacob Pieter ; Simonsz, Huibert Jan ; de Jongh‐van den Tweel, Marijke ; Kroon, Angelie ; Visser, Karin ; Schoonenberg, Anneke ; Berg, Wilma ; Verheij, Gerdien ; Lokhorst, Linda ; Visser, Esmeralda ; Slot, Xanne ; Dijk, Japke ; Scholten, Cindy ; Bos‐Koelewijn, Christine ; Graaf‐Helfensteijn, Marijke ; Wijkmans, Carina ; Sultanali, Nilofar ; Schouten, Jorien ; Boon, Linda ; Graaf, Alice ; Peeters, Mirjam ; Aggelen, Inge ; Westra‐Postma, Imke ; Bos, Jacqueline ; Evers, Hanneke ; Bennen, Annemiek ; Hoekstra, Marijke ; Asjes, Wijnanda ; Dijkers, Elfi ; Meppel, Isala ; Boer, Ruth ; Alteveer, Tamara ; Schram‐Rienstra, Dina ; Timmer‐de Kok, Jolanda ; Hoolsema‐Greving, Tineke ; Ketwich‐Godfroy, Friedel ; Steenbergen, Liesbeth ; Gutter, Mari ; Arentzen, Josine ; Heuveling‐Rijswijk, Marike ; Andel, Heleen ; Dijk, Marieke ; Lieverse, Elsa ; Vries, Jolanda ; Holweg, Tim ; Vries, Erik</creator><creatorcontrib>Sloot, Frea ; Telleman, Marieke Alberdina Johanna ; Benjamins, Janine ; Sami, Aya ; Hoogendam, Jacob Pieter ; Simonsz, Huibert Jan ; de Jongh‐van den Tweel, Marijke ; Kroon, Angelie ; Visser, Karin ; Schoonenberg, Anneke ; Berg, Wilma ; Verheij, Gerdien ; Lokhorst, Linda ; Visser, Esmeralda ; Slot, Xanne ; Dijk, Japke ; Scholten, Cindy ; Bos‐Koelewijn, Christine ; Graaf‐Helfensteijn, Marijke ; Wijkmans, Carina ; Sultanali, Nilofar ; Schouten, Jorien ; Boon, Linda ; Graaf, Alice ; Peeters, Mirjam ; Aggelen, Inge ; Westra‐Postma, Imke ; Bos, Jacqueline ; Evers, Hanneke ; Bennen, Annemiek ; Hoekstra, Marijke ; Asjes, Wijnanda ; Dijkers, Elfi ; Meppel, Isala ; Boer, Ruth ; Alteveer, Tamara ; Schram‐Rienstra, Dina ; Timmer‐de Kok, Jolanda ; Hoolsema‐Greving, Tineke ; Ketwich‐Godfroy, Friedel ; Steenbergen, Liesbeth ; Gutter, Mari ; Arentzen, Josine ; Heuveling‐Rijswijk, Marike ; Andel, Heleen ; Dijk, Marieke ; Lieverse, Elsa ; Vries, Jolanda ; Holweg, Tim ; Vries, Erik ; Orthoptic Research Group</creatorcontrib><description>Purpose
The effectiveness of preverbal orthoptic tests at age 6, 9, 14 and 24 months in population‐wide screening was assessed.
Methods
Two consecutive birth cohorts at 134 centres were compared. At general health screening visits, children born July–December 2011 were vision screened four times between 6 and 24 months with inspection, pupillary reflexes, eye motility, Hirschberg, cover test and monocular pursuit. Children born January–June 2012 were vision screened at general screening visits only in case of visually apparent abnormalities or positive family history. After referral, cause and severity of amblyopia were determined. Visual acuity was measured in all children at 36 and 45 months.
Results
The control and intervention group comprised 5649 versus 5162 children. Amblyopia was diagnosed in 185 (3.3%) versus 159 children (3.1%), outside of screening in 21 (11.4%) versus 25 (15.7%). Between 6 and 24 months, 44 (23.8%) versus 27 (17%) (RR = 0.67 [95% CI 0.42, 1.09]) were referred and after visual acuity (VA) measurement 120 (64.9%) versus 107 (67.3%). Of 109 versus 108 children with refractive or bilateral amblyopia, 94 (86.2%) versus 92 (85.2%) were detected with VA measurements. Visual acuity of the amblyopic eye, after referral, was not significantly different between groups (p 0.896), nor was the time to amblyopia diagnosis (intention to screen [p 0.55]; per protocol [p 0.11]).
Conclusion
The effectiveness of vision screening was not influenced by omission of orthoptic tests at general health screening at 6–24 months. Refractive and bilateral amblyopia were almost exclusively found by VA measurements.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1755-375X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1755-3768</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1111/aos.14859</identifier><identifier>PMID: 33817982</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>England: Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</publisher><subject>Acuity ; amblyopia ; Child, Preschool ; Children ; eye screening ; Female ; Humans ; Incidence ; Male ; Medical screening ; Netherlands - epidemiology ; Original ; Orthoptics - methods ; paediatric screening ; Population Surveillance - methods ; Reflexes ; strabismus ; Vision ; Vision Disorders - diagnosis ; Vision Disorders - epidemiology ; vision screening ; Vision Screening - methods ; Visual Acuity</subject><ispartof>Acta ophthalmologica (Oxford, England), 2022-02, Vol.100 (1), p.e100-e114</ispartof><rights>2021 The Authors. Acta Ophthalmologica published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of Foundation</rights><rights>2021 The Authors. Acta Ophthalmologica published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of Acta Ophthalmologica Scandinavica Foundation.</rights><rights>2021. This article is published under http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4439-44e98e07430f02ec8b2589af106146d2a2c30a304a7b5323a661f03c863168de3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4439-44e98e07430f02ec8b2589af106146d2a2c30a304a7b5323a661f03c863168de3</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-0942-4243 ; 0000-0001-5899-6654</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1111%2Faos.14859$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111%2Faos.14859$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,777,781,882,1412,1428,27905,27906,45555,45556,46390,46814</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33817982$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Sloot, Frea</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Telleman, Marieke Alberdina Johanna</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Benjamins, Janine</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sami, Aya</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hoogendam, Jacob Pieter</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Simonsz, Huibert Jan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>de Jongh‐van den Tweel, Marijke</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kroon, Angelie</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Visser, Karin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Schoonenberg, Anneke</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Berg, Wilma</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Verheij, Gerdien</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lokhorst, Linda</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Visser, Esmeralda</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Slot, Xanne</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dijk, Japke</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Scholten, Cindy</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bos‐Koelewijn, Christine</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Graaf‐Helfensteijn, Marijke</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wijkmans, Carina</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sultanali, Nilofar</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Schouten, Jorien</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Boon, Linda</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Graaf, Alice</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Peeters, Mirjam</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Aggelen, Inge</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Westra‐Postma, Imke</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bos, Jacqueline</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Evers, Hanneke</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bennen, Annemiek</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hoekstra, Marijke</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Asjes, Wijnanda</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dijkers, Elfi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Meppel, Isala</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Boer, Ruth</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Alteveer, Tamara</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Schram‐Rienstra, Dina</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Timmer‐de Kok, Jolanda</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hoolsema‐Greving, Tineke</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ketwich‐Godfroy, Friedel</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Steenbergen, Liesbeth</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gutter, Mari</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Arentzen, Josine</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Heuveling‐Rijswijk, Marike</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Andel, Heleen</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dijk, Marieke</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lieverse, Elsa</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Vries, Jolanda</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Holweg, Tim</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Vries, Erik</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Orthoptic Research Group</creatorcontrib><title>Effectiveness of routine population‐wide orthoptic preschool vision screening tests at age 6–24 months in the Netherlands</title><title>Acta ophthalmologica (Oxford, England)</title><addtitle>Acta Ophthalmol</addtitle><description>Purpose
The effectiveness of preverbal orthoptic tests at age 6, 9, 14 and 24 months in population‐wide screening was assessed.
Methods
Two consecutive birth cohorts at 134 centres were compared. At general health screening visits, children born July–December 2011 were vision screened four times between 6 and 24 months with inspection, pupillary reflexes, eye motility, Hirschberg, cover test and monocular pursuit. Children born January–June 2012 were vision screened at general screening visits only in case of visually apparent abnormalities or positive family history. After referral, cause and severity of amblyopia were determined. Visual acuity was measured in all children at 36 and 45 months.
Results
The control and intervention group comprised 5649 versus 5162 children. Amblyopia was diagnosed in 185 (3.3%) versus 159 children (3.1%), outside of screening in 21 (11.4%) versus 25 (15.7%). Between 6 and 24 months, 44 (23.8%) versus 27 (17%) (RR = 0.67 [95% CI 0.42, 1.09]) were referred and after visual acuity (VA) measurement 120 (64.9%) versus 107 (67.3%). Of 109 versus 108 children with refractive or bilateral amblyopia, 94 (86.2%) versus 92 (85.2%) were detected with VA measurements. Visual acuity of the amblyopic eye, after referral, was not significantly different between groups (p 0.896), nor was the time to amblyopia diagnosis (intention to screen [p 0.55]; per protocol [p 0.11]).
Conclusion
The effectiveness of vision screening was not influenced by omission of orthoptic tests at general health screening at 6–24 months. Refractive and bilateral amblyopia were almost exclusively found by VA measurements.</description><subject>Acuity</subject><subject>amblyopia</subject><subject>Child, Preschool</subject><subject>Children</subject><subject>eye screening</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Incidence</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Medical screening</subject><subject>Netherlands - epidemiology</subject><subject>Original</subject><subject>Orthoptics - methods</subject><subject>paediatric screening</subject><subject>Population Surveillance - methods</subject><subject>Reflexes</subject><subject>strabismus</subject><subject>Vision</subject><subject>Vision Disorders - diagnosis</subject><subject>Vision Disorders - epidemiology</subject><subject>vision screening</subject><subject>Vision Screening - methods</subject><subject>Visual Acuity</subject><issn>1755-375X</issn><issn>1755-3768</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2022</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>24P</sourceid><sourceid>WIN</sourceid><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNp1kc1qFTEYhgdRbK0uvAEJuKmL0-Z_ko1QSv2BYhcquAs5mW_OpMxJxiRzShdCL0HwDnslpp56UMEskg_y8PC9vE3znOAjUs-xjfmIcCX0g2aftEIsWCvVw90svuw1T3K-xFgSKfnjZo8xRVqt6H7z7azvwRW_gQA5o9ijFOfiA6ApTvNoi4_h9ub7le8AxVSGOBXv0JQguyHGEW18rgTKLgEEH1aoQC4Z2YLsCpC8vflBOVrHUIaMfEBlAPQB6p1GG7r8tHnU2zHDs_v3oPn85uzT6bvF-cXb96cn5wvHOdMLzkErwC1nuMcUnFpSobTtSQ3EZUctdQxbhrltl4JRZqUkPWZOSUak6oAdNK-33mlerqFzEEqyo5mSX9t0baL15u-f4AezihujqcaE8Co4vBek-HWuEc3aZwdjTQFxzoYKrJTGQouKvvwHvYxzCjWeoZIowgnld9SrLeVSzDlBv1uGYHNXqqmlml-lVvbFn9vvyN8tVuB4C1z5Ea7_bzInFx-3yp9zo69b</recordid><startdate>202202</startdate><enddate>202202</enddate><creator>Sloot, Frea</creator><creator>Telleman, Marieke Alberdina Johanna</creator><creator>Benjamins, Janine</creator><creator>Sami, Aya</creator><creator>Hoogendam, Jacob Pieter</creator><creator>Simonsz, Huibert Jan</creator><creator>de Jongh‐van den Tweel, Marijke</creator><creator>Kroon, Angelie</creator><creator>Visser, Karin</creator><creator>Schoonenberg, Anneke</creator><creator>Berg, Wilma</creator><creator>Verheij, Gerdien</creator><creator>Lokhorst, Linda</creator><creator>Visser, Esmeralda</creator><creator>Slot, Xanne</creator><creator>Dijk, Japke</creator><creator>Scholten, Cindy</creator><creator>Bos‐Koelewijn, Christine</creator><creator>Graaf‐Helfensteijn, Marijke</creator><creator>Wijkmans, Carina</creator><creator>Sultanali, Nilofar</creator><creator>Schouten, Jorien</creator><creator>Boon, Linda</creator><creator>Graaf, Alice</creator><creator>Peeters, Mirjam</creator><creator>Aggelen, Inge</creator><creator>Westra‐Postma, Imke</creator><creator>Bos, Jacqueline</creator><creator>Evers, Hanneke</creator><creator>Bennen, Annemiek</creator><creator>Hoekstra, Marijke</creator><creator>Asjes, Wijnanda</creator><creator>Dijkers, Elfi</creator><creator>Meppel, Isala</creator><creator>Boer, Ruth</creator><creator>Alteveer, Tamara</creator><creator>Schram‐Rienstra, Dina</creator><creator>Timmer‐de Kok, Jolanda</creator><creator>Hoolsema‐Greving, Tineke</creator><creator>Ketwich‐Godfroy, Friedel</creator><creator>Steenbergen, Liesbeth</creator><creator>Gutter, Mari</creator><creator>Arentzen, Josine</creator><creator>Heuveling‐Rijswijk, Marike</creator><creator>Andel, Heleen</creator><creator>Dijk, Marieke</creator><creator>Lieverse, Elsa</creator><creator>Vries, Jolanda</creator><creator>Holweg, Tim</creator><creator>Vries, Erik</creator><general>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</general><general>John Wiley and Sons Inc</general><scope>24P</scope><scope>WIN</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7TK</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0942-4243</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5899-6654</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>202202</creationdate><title>Effectiveness of routine population‐wide orthoptic preschool vision screening tests at age 6–24 months in the Netherlands</title><author>Sloot, Frea ; Telleman, Marieke Alberdina Johanna ; Benjamins, Janine ; Sami, Aya ; Hoogendam, Jacob Pieter ; Simonsz, Huibert Jan ; de Jongh‐van den Tweel, Marijke ; Kroon, Angelie ; Visser, Karin ; Schoonenberg, Anneke ; Berg, Wilma ; Verheij, Gerdien ; Lokhorst, Linda ; Visser, Esmeralda ; Slot, Xanne ; Dijk, Japke ; Scholten, Cindy ; Bos‐Koelewijn, Christine ; Graaf‐Helfensteijn, Marijke ; Wijkmans, Carina ; Sultanali, Nilofar ; Schouten, Jorien ; Boon, Linda ; Graaf, Alice ; Peeters, Mirjam ; Aggelen, Inge ; Westra‐Postma, Imke ; Bos, Jacqueline ; Evers, Hanneke ; Bennen, Annemiek ; Hoekstra, Marijke ; Asjes, Wijnanda ; Dijkers, Elfi ; Meppel, Isala ; Boer, Ruth ; Alteveer, Tamara ; Schram‐Rienstra, Dina ; Timmer‐de Kok, Jolanda ; Hoolsema‐Greving, Tineke ; Ketwich‐Godfroy, Friedel ; Steenbergen, Liesbeth ; Gutter, Mari ; Arentzen, Josine ; Heuveling‐Rijswijk, Marike ; Andel, Heleen ; Dijk, Marieke ; Lieverse, Elsa ; Vries, Jolanda ; Holweg, Tim ; Vries, Erik</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4439-44e98e07430f02ec8b2589af106146d2a2c30a304a7b5323a661f03c863168de3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2022</creationdate><topic>Acuity</topic><topic>amblyopia</topic><topic>Child, Preschool</topic><topic>Children</topic><topic>eye screening</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Incidence</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Medical screening</topic><topic>Netherlands - epidemiology</topic><topic>Original</topic><topic>Orthoptics - methods</topic><topic>paediatric screening</topic><topic>Population Surveillance - methods</topic><topic>Reflexes</topic><topic>strabismus</topic><topic>Vision</topic><topic>Vision Disorders - diagnosis</topic><topic>Vision Disorders - epidemiology</topic><topic>vision screening</topic><topic>Vision Screening - methods</topic><topic>Visual Acuity</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Sloot, Frea</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Telleman, Marieke Alberdina Johanna</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Benjamins, Janine</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sami, Aya</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hoogendam, Jacob Pieter</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Simonsz, Huibert Jan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>de Jongh‐van den Tweel, Marijke</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kroon, Angelie</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Visser, Karin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Schoonenberg, Anneke</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Berg, Wilma</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Verheij, Gerdien</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lokhorst, Linda</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Visser, Esmeralda</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Slot, Xanne</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dijk, Japke</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Scholten, Cindy</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bos‐Koelewijn, Christine</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Graaf‐Helfensteijn, Marijke</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wijkmans, Carina</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sultanali, Nilofar</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Schouten, Jorien</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Boon, Linda</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Graaf, Alice</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Peeters, Mirjam</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Aggelen, Inge</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Westra‐Postma, Imke</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bos, Jacqueline</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Evers, Hanneke</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bennen, Annemiek</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hoekstra, Marijke</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Asjes, Wijnanda</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dijkers, Elfi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Meppel, Isala</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Boer, Ruth</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Alteveer, Tamara</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Schram‐Rienstra, Dina</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Timmer‐de Kok, Jolanda</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hoolsema‐Greving, Tineke</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ketwich‐Godfroy, Friedel</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Steenbergen, Liesbeth</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gutter, Mari</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Arentzen, Josine</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Heuveling‐Rijswijk, Marike</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Andel, Heleen</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dijk, Marieke</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lieverse, Elsa</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Vries, Jolanda</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Holweg, Tim</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Vries, Erik</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Orthoptic Research Group</creatorcontrib><collection>Wiley-Blackwell Open Access Titles</collection><collection>Wiley Free Content</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Neurosciences Abstracts</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>Acta ophthalmologica (Oxford, England)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Sloot, Frea</au><au>Telleman, Marieke Alberdina Johanna</au><au>Benjamins, Janine</au><au>Sami, Aya</au><au>Hoogendam, Jacob Pieter</au><au>Simonsz, Huibert Jan</au><au>de Jongh‐van den Tweel, Marijke</au><au>Kroon, Angelie</au><au>Visser, Karin</au><au>Schoonenberg, Anneke</au><au>Berg, Wilma</au><au>Verheij, Gerdien</au><au>Lokhorst, Linda</au><au>Visser, Esmeralda</au><au>Slot, Xanne</au><au>Dijk, Japke</au><au>Scholten, Cindy</au><au>Bos‐Koelewijn, Christine</au><au>Graaf‐Helfensteijn, Marijke</au><au>Wijkmans, Carina</au><au>Sultanali, Nilofar</au><au>Schouten, Jorien</au><au>Boon, Linda</au><au>Graaf, Alice</au><au>Peeters, Mirjam</au><au>Aggelen, Inge</au><au>Westra‐Postma, Imke</au><au>Bos, Jacqueline</au><au>Evers, Hanneke</au><au>Bennen, Annemiek</au><au>Hoekstra, Marijke</au><au>Asjes, Wijnanda</au><au>Dijkers, Elfi</au><au>Meppel, Isala</au><au>Boer, Ruth</au><au>Alteveer, Tamara</au><au>Schram‐Rienstra, Dina</au><au>Timmer‐de Kok, Jolanda</au><au>Hoolsema‐Greving, Tineke</au><au>Ketwich‐Godfroy, Friedel</au><au>Steenbergen, Liesbeth</au><au>Gutter, Mari</au><au>Arentzen, Josine</au><au>Heuveling‐Rijswijk, Marike</au><au>Andel, Heleen</au><au>Dijk, Marieke</au><au>Lieverse, Elsa</au><au>Vries, Jolanda</au><au>Holweg, Tim</au><au>Vries, Erik</au><aucorp>Orthoptic Research Group</aucorp><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Effectiveness of routine population‐wide orthoptic preschool vision screening tests at age 6–24 months in the Netherlands</atitle><jtitle>Acta ophthalmologica (Oxford, England)</jtitle><addtitle>Acta Ophthalmol</addtitle><date>2022-02</date><risdate>2022</risdate><volume>100</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>e100</spage><epage>e114</epage><pages>e100-e114</pages><issn>1755-375X</issn><eissn>1755-3768</eissn><abstract>Purpose
The effectiveness of preverbal orthoptic tests at age 6, 9, 14 and 24 months in population‐wide screening was assessed.
Methods
Two consecutive birth cohorts at 134 centres were compared. At general health screening visits, children born July–December 2011 were vision screened four times between 6 and 24 months with inspection, pupillary reflexes, eye motility, Hirschberg, cover test and monocular pursuit. Children born January–June 2012 were vision screened at general screening visits only in case of visually apparent abnormalities or positive family history. After referral, cause and severity of amblyopia were determined. Visual acuity was measured in all children at 36 and 45 months.
Results
The control and intervention group comprised 5649 versus 5162 children. Amblyopia was diagnosed in 185 (3.3%) versus 159 children (3.1%), outside of screening in 21 (11.4%) versus 25 (15.7%). Between 6 and 24 months, 44 (23.8%) versus 27 (17%) (RR = 0.67 [95% CI 0.42, 1.09]) were referred and after visual acuity (VA) measurement 120 (64.9%) versus 107 (67.3%). Of 109 versus 108 children with refractive or bilateral amblyopia, 94 (86.2%) versus 92 (85.2%) were detected with VA measurements. Visual acuity of the amblyopic eye, after referral, was not significantly different between groups (p 0.896), nor was the time to amblyopia diagnosis (intention to screen [p 0.55]; per protocol [p 0.11]).
Conclusion
The effectiveness of vision screening was not influenced by omission of orthoptic tests at general health screening at 6–24 months. Refractive and bilateral amblyopia were almost exclusively found by VA measurements.</abstract><cop>England</cop><pub>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</pub><pmid>33817982</pmid><doi>10.1111/aos.14859</doi><tpages>114</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0942-4243</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5899-6654</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1755-375X |
ispartof | Acta ophthalmologica (Oxford, England), 2022-02, Vol.100 (1), p.e100-e114 |
issn | 1755-375X 1755-3768 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_9290114 |
source | MEDLINE; Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete; Wiley Free Content |
subjects | Acuity amblyopia Child, Preschool Children eye screening Female Humans Incidence Male Medical screening Netherlands - epidemiology Original Orthoptics - methods paediatric screening Population Surveillance - methods Reflexes strabismus Vision Vision Disorders - diagnosis Vision Disorders - epidemiology vision screening Vision Screening - methods Visual Acuity |
title | Effectiveness of routine population‐wide orthoptic preschool vision screening tests at age 6–24 months in the Netherlands |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-18T11%3A45%3A04IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Effectiveness%20of%20routine%20population%E2%80%90wide%20orthoptic%20preschool%20vision%20screening%20tests%20at%20age%206%E2%80%9324%20months%20in%20the%20Netherlands&rft.jtitle=Acta%20ophthalmologica%20(Oxford,%20England)&rft.au=Sloot,%20Frea&rft.aucorp=Orthoptic%20Research%20Group&rft.date=2022-02&rft.volume=100&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=e100&rft.epage=e114&rft.pages=e100-e114&rft.issn=1755-375X&rft.eissn=1755-3768&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111/aos.14859&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E2508890595%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2618141245&rft_id=info:pmid/33817982&rfr_iscdi=true |