Public participation, engagement, and climate change adaptation: A review of the research literature

There is a clear need for a state‐of‐the‐art review of how public participation in climate change adaptation is being considered in research across academic communities: The Rio Declaration developed in 1992 at the UN Conference on Environment and Development (UNCED) included explicit goals of citiz...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Wiley interdisciplinary reviews. Climate change 2020-07, Vol.11 (4), p.e645-n/a
Hauptverfasser: Hügel, Stephan, Davies, Anna R.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page n/a
container_issue 4
container_start_page e645
container_title Wiley interdisciplinary reviews. Climate change
container_volume 11
creator Hügel, Stephan
Davies, Anna R.
description There is a clear need for a state‐of‐the‐art review of how public participation in climate change adaptation is being considered in research across academic communities: The Rio Declaration developed in 1992 at the UN Conference on Environment and Development (UNCED) included explicit goals of citizen participation and engagement in climate actions (Principle 10). Nation states were given special responsibility to facilitate these by ensuring access to information and opportunities to participate in decision‐making processes. Since then the need for public participation has featured prominently in calls to climate action. Using text analysis to produce a corpus of s drawn from Web of Science, a review of literature incorporating public participation and citizen engagement in climate change adaptation since 1992 reveals lexical, temporal, and spatial distribution dynamics of research on the topic. An exponential rise in research effort since the year 2000 is demonstrated, with the focus of research action on three substantial themes—risk, flood risk, and risk assessment, perception, and communication. These are critically reviewed and three substantive issues are considered: the paradox of participation, the challenge of governance transformation, and the need to incorporate psycho‐social and behavioral adaptation to climate change in policy processes. Gaps in current research include a lack of common understanding of public participation for climate adaptation across disciplines; incomplete articulation of processes involving public participation and citizen engagement; and a paucity of empirical research examining how understanding and usage of influential concepts of risk, vulnerability and adaptive capacity varies among different disciplines and stakeholders. Finally, a provisional research agenda for attending to these gaps is described. This article is categorized under: Vulnerability and Adaptation to Climate Change > Institutions for Adaptation Policy and Governance > Governing Climate Change in Communities, Cities, and Regions Number of publications per year relating to public engagement, public participation, or citizen engagement for climate change adaptation. The quadratic curve demonstrates that submissions in this subject area are currently more than doubling year‐on‐year.
doi_str_mv 10.1002/wcc.645
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_9285715</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2692753890</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4105-fdb2085d64a0cee0acf23e1e063e7d9136c1b93a0793499fb11e7c59a7e6c0cc3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kU9rFEEQxRtRTIjBr9DgQcFs7D_T090eAmHRRAjoQfHY1NTU7HaYnRm7Z7Lk29txQ0DBulQV9ePxisfYaynOpRDqwx7xvK7MM3YsrbEra71__jQ7ccROc74VpbRyzlUv2ZE2zvhaumPWfluaPiKfIM0R4wRzHIczTsMGNrSjYT7jMLQc-7iDmThuYdgQhxam-Q_6kV_yRHeR9nzs-LylsmWChFvex5kSzEuiV-xFB32m08d-wn58_vR9fb26-Xr1ZX15s8JKCrPq2kYJZ9q6AoFEArBTmiSJWpNtvdQ1ysZrENbryvuukZIsGg-WahSI-oRdHHSnpdlRi8V-gj5MqZhP92GEGP6-DHEbNuNd8MoZK00RePcokMZfC-U57GJG6nsYaFxyULVX1mjnRUHf_IPejksayntBVVIWf6quCvX2QGEac07UPZmRIjyEF0p4oYRXyPcHch97uv8fFn6u1w_0b4YWmfQ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2411499264</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Public participation, engagement, and climate change adaptation: A review of the research literature</title><source>Wiley-Blackwell Journals</source><source>PAIS Index</source><creator>Hügel, Stephan ; Davies, Anna R.</creator><creatorcontrib>Hügel, Stephan ; Davies, Anna R.</creatorcontrib><description>There is a clear need for a state‐of‐the‐art review of how public participation in climate change adaptation is being considered in research across academic communities: The Rio Declaration developed in 1992 at the UN Conference on Environment and Development (UNCED) included explicit goals of citizen participation and engagement in climate actions (Principle 10). Nation states were given special responsibility to facilitate these by ensuring access to information and opportunities to participate in decision‐making processes. Since then the need for public participation has featured prominently in calls to climate action. Using text analysis to produce a corpus of s drawn from Web of Science, a review of literature incorporating public participation and citizen engagement in climate change adaptation since 1992 reveals lexical, temporal, and spatial distribution dynamics of research on the topic. An exponential rise in research effort since the year 2000 is demonstrated, with the focus of research action on three substantial themes—risk, flood risk, and risk assessment, perception, and communication. These are critically reviewed and three substantive issues are considered: the paradox of participation, the challenge of governance transformation, and the need to incorporate psycho‐social and behavioral adaptation to climate change in policy processes. Gaps in current research include a lack of common understanding of public participation for climate adaptation across disciplines; incomplete articulation of processes involving public participation and citizen engagement; and a paucity of empirical research examining how understanding and usage of influential concepts of risk, vulnerability and adaptive capacity varies among different disciplines and stakeholders. Finally, a provisional research agenda for attending to these gaps is described. This article is categorized under: Vulnerability and Adaptation to Climate Change &gt; Institutions for Adaptation Policy and Governance &gt; Governing Climate Change in Communities, Cities, and Regions Number of publications per year relating to public engagement, public participation, or citizen engagement for climate change adaptation. The quadratic curve demonstrates that submissions in this subject area are currently more than doubling year‐on‐year.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1757-7780</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1757-7799</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1002/wcc.645</identifier><identifier>PMID: 35859618</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Hoboken, USA: John Wiley &amp; Sons, Inc</publisher><subject>Access to information ; Action ; Adaptation ; Advanced Review ; Advanced Reviews ; citizen engagement ; Citizen participation ; Climate action ; Climate adaptation ; Climate change ; climate change adaptation ; Climatic analysis ; Decision making ; Empirical analysis ; Environmental policy ; Environmental risk ; Flood risk ; Governance ; Governing Climate Change in Communities, Cities, and Regions ; Information dissemination ; Institutions for Adaptation ; Literature reviews ; Nation states ; public engagement ; Public participation ; Research methodology ; Reviews ; Risk assessment ; Risk communication ; Risk perception ; Spatial analysis ; Spatial distribution</subject><ispartof>Wiley interdisciplinary reviews. Climate change, 2020-07, Vol.11 (4), p.e645-n/a</ispartof><rights>2020 The Authors. published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc.</rights><rights>2020. This article is published under http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4105-fdb2085d64a0cee0acf23e1e063e7d9136c1b93a0793499fb11e7c59a7e6c0cc3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4105-fdb2085d64a0cee0acf23e1e063e7d9136c1b93a0793499fb11e7c59a7e6c0cc3</cites><orcidid>0000-0003-4379-2450</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1002%2Fwcc.645$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1002%2Fwcc.645$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,776,780,881,1411,27845,27903,27904,45553,45554</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Hügel, Stephan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Davies, Anna R.</creatorcontrib><title>Public participation, engagement, and climate change adaptation: A review of the research literature</title><title>Wiley interdisciplinary reviews. Climate change</title><description>There is a clear need for a state‐of‐the‐art review of how public participation in climate change adaptation is being considered in research across academic communities: The Rio Declaration developed in 1992 at the UN Conference on Environment and Development (UNCED) included explicit goals of citizen participation and engagement in climate actions (Principle 10). Nation states were given special responsibility to facilitate these by ensuring access to information and opportunities to participate in decision‐making processes. Since then the need for public participation has featured prominently in calls to climate action. Using text analysis to produce a corpus of s drawn from Web of Science, a review of literature incorporating public participation and citizen engagement in climate change adaptation since 1992 reveals lexical, temporal, and spatial distribution dynamics of research on the topic. An exponential rise in research effort since the year 2000 is demonstrated, with the focus of research action on three substantial themes—risk, flood risk, and risk assessment, perception, and communication. These are critically reviewed and three substantive issues are considered: the paradox of participation, the challenge of governance transformation, and the need to incorporate psycho‐social and behavioral adaptation to climate change in policy processes. Gaps in current research include a lack of common understanding of public participation for climate adaptation across disciplines; incomplete articulation of processes involving public participation and citizen engagement; and a paucity of empirical research examining how understanding and usage of influential concepts of risk, vulnerability and adaptive capacity varies among different disciplines and stakeholders. Finally, a provisional research agenda for attending to these gaps is described. This article is categorized under: Vulnerability and Adaptation to Climate Change &gt; Institutions for Adaptation Policy and Governance &gt; Governing Climate Change in Communities, Cities, and Regions Number of publications per year relating to public engagement, public participation, or citizen engagement for climate change adaptation. The quadratic curve demonstrates that submissions in this subject area are currently more than doubling year‐on‐year.</description><subject>Access to information</subject><subject>Action</subject><subject>Adaptation</subject><subject>Advanced Review</subject><subject>Advanced Reviews</subject><subject>citizen engagement</subject><subject>Citizen participation</subject><subject>Climate action</subject><subject>Climate adaptation</subject><subject>Climate change</subject><subject>climate change adaptation</subject><subject>Climatic analysis</subject><subject>Decision making</subject><subject>Empirical analysis</subject><subject>Environmental policy</subject><subject>Environmental risk</subject><subject>Flood risk</subject><subject>Governance</subject><subject>Governing Climate Change in Communities, Cities, and Regions</subject><subject>Information dissemination</subject><subject>Institutions for Adaptation</subject><subject>Literature reviews</subject><subject>Nation states</subject><subject>public engagement</subject><subject>Public participation</subject><subject>Research methodology</subject><subject>Reviews</subject><subject>Risk assessment</subject><subject>Risk communication</subject><subject>Risk perception</subject><subject>Spatial analysis</subject><subject>Spatial distribution</subject><issn>1757-7780</issn><issn>1757-7799</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2020</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>24P</sourceid><sourceid>WIN</sourceid><sourceid>7TQ</sourceid><recordid>eNp1kU9rFEEQxRtRTIjBr9DgQcFs7D_T090eAmHRRAjoQfHY1NTU7HaYnRm7Z7Lk29txQ0DBulQV9ePxisfYaynOpRDqwx7xvK7MM3YsrbEra71__jQ7ccROc74VpbRyzlUv2ZE2zvhaumPWfluaPiKfIM0R4wRzHIczTsMGNrSjYT7jMLQc-7iDmThuYdgQhxam-Q_6kV_yRHeR9nzs-LylsmWChFvex5kSzEuiV-xFB32m08d-wn58_vR9fb26-Xr1ZX15s8JKCrPq2kYJZ9q6AoFEArBTmiSJWpNtvdQ1ysZrENbryvuukZIsGg-WahSI-oRdHHSnpdlRi8V-gj5MqZhP92GEGP6-DHEbNuNd8MoZK00RePcokMZfC-U57GJG6nsYaFxyULVX1mjnRUHf_IPejksayntBVVIWf6quCvX2QGEac07UPZmRIjyEF0p4oYRXyPcHch97uv8fFn6u1w_0b4YWmfQ</recordid><startdate>202007</startdate><enddate>202007</enddate><creator>Hügel, Stephan</creator><creator>Davies, Anna R.</creator><general>John Wiley &amp; Sons, Inc</general><general>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</general><scope>24P</scope><scope>WIN</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7ST</scope><scope>7TG</scope><scope>7TQ</scope><scope>7U6</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>DHY</scope><scope>DON</scope><scope>KL.</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4379-2450</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>202007</creationdate><title>Public participation, engagement, and climate change adaptation: A review of the research literature</title><author>Hügel, Stephan ; Davies, Anna R.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4105-fdb2085d64a0cee0acf23e1e063e7d9136c1b93a0793499fb11e7c59a7e6c0cc3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2020</creationdate><topic>Access to information</topic><topic>Action</topic><topic>Adaptation</topic><topic>Advanced Review</topic><topic>Advanced Reviews</topic><topic>citizen engagement</topic><topic>Citizen participation</topic><topic>Climate action</topic><topic>Climate adaptation</topic><topic>Climate change</topic><topic>climate change adaptation</topic><topic>Climatic analysis</topic><topic>Decision making</topic><topic>Empirical analysis</topic><topic>Environmental policy</topic><topic>Environmental risk</topic><topic>Flood risk</topic><topic>Governance</topic><topic>Governing Climate Change in Communities, Cities, and Regions</topic><topic>Information dissemination</topic><topic>Institutions for Adaptation</topic><topic>Literature reviews</topic><topic>Nation states</topic><topic>public engagement</topic><topic>Public participation</topic><topic>Research methodology</topic><topic>Reviews</topic><topic>Risk assessment</topic><topic>Risk communication</topic><topic>Risk perception</topic><topic>Spatial analysis</topic><topic>Spatial distribution</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Hügel, Stephan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Davies, Anna R.</creatorcontrib><collection>Wiley Open Access Journals</collection><collection>Wiley-Blackwell Backfiles (Open access)</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Meteorological &amp; Geoastrophysical Abstracts</collection><collection>PAIS Index</collection><collection>Sustainability Science Abstracts</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>PAIS International</collection><collection>PAIS International (Ovid)</collection><collection>Meteorological &amp; Geoastrophysical Abstracts - Academic</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>Wiley interdisciplinary reviews. Climate change</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Hügel, Stephan</au><au>Davies, Anna R.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Public participation, engagement, and climate change adaptation: A review of the research literature</atitle><jtitle>Wiley interdisciplinary reviews. Climate change</jtitle><date>2020-07</date><risdate>2020</risdate><volume>11</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>e645</spage><epage>n/a</epage><pages>e645-n/a</pages><issn>1757-7780</issn><eissn>1757-7799</eissn><abstract>There is a clear need for a state‐of‐the‐art review of how public participation in climate change adaptation is being considered in research across academic communities: The Rio Declaration developed in 1992 at the UN Conference on Environment and Development (UNCED) included explicit goals of citizen participation and engagement in climate actions (Principle 10). Nation states were given special responsibility to facilitate these by ensuring access to information and opportunities to participate in decision‐making processes. Since then the need for public participation has featured prominently in calls to climate action. Using text analysis to produce a corpus of s drawn from Web of Science, a review of literature incorporating public participation and citizen engagement in climate change adaptation since 1992 reveals lexical, temporal, and spatial distribution dynamics of research on the topic. An exponential rise in research effort since the year 2000 is demonstrated, with the focus of research action on three substantial themes—risk, flood risk, and risk assessment, perception, and communication. These are critically reviewed and three substantive issues are considered: the paradox of participation, the challenge of governance transformation, and the need to incorporate psycho‐social and behavioral adaptation to climate change in policy processes. Gaps in current research include a lack of common understanding of public participation for climate adaptation across disciplines; incomplete articulation of processes involving public participation and citizen engagement; and a paucity of empirical research examining how understanding and usage of influential concepts of risk, vulnerability and adaptive capacity varies among different disciplines and stakeholders. Finally, a provisional research agenda for attending to these gaps is described. This article is categorized under: Vulnerability and Adaptation to Climate Change &gt; Institutions for Adaptation Policy and Governance &gt; Governing Climate Change in Communities, Cities, and Regions Number of publications per year relating to public engagement, public participation, or citizen engagement for climate change adaptation. The quadratic curve demonstrates that submissions in this subject area are currently more than doubling year‐on‐year.</abstract><cop>Hoboken, USA</cop><pub>John Wiley &amp; Sons, Inc</pub><pmid>35859618</pmid><doi>10.1002/wcc.645</doi><tpages>20</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4379-2450</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1757-7780
ispartof Wiley interdisciplinary reviews. Climate change, 2020-07, Vol.11 (4), p.e645-n/a
issn 1757-7780
1757-7799
language eng
recordid cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_9285715
source Wiley-Blackwell Journals; PAIS Index
subjects Access to information
Action
Adaptation
Advanced Review
Advanced Reviews
citizen engagement
Citizen participation
Climate action
Climate adaptation
Climate change
climate change adaptation
Climatic analysis
Decision making
Empirical analysis
Environmental policy
Environmental risk
Flood risk
Governance
Governing Climate Change in Communities, Cities, and Regions
Information dissemination
Institutions for Adaptation
Literature reviews
Nation states
public engagement
Public participation
Research methodology
Reviews
Risk assessment
Risk communication
Risk perception
Spatial analysis
Spatial distribution
title Public participation, engagement, and climate change adaptation: A review of the research literature
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-22T16%3A20%3A41IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Public%20participation,%20engagement,%20and%20climate%20change%20adaptation:%20A%20review%20of%20the%20research%20literature&rft.jtitle=Wiley%20interdisciplinary%20reviews.%20Climate%20change&rft.au=H%C3%BCgel,%20Stephan&rft.date=2020-07&rft.volume=11&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=e645&rft.epage=n/a&rft.pages=e645-n/a&rft.issn=1757-7780&rft.eissn=1757-7799&rft_id=info:doi/10.1002/wcc.645&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E2692753890%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2411499264&rft_id=info:pmid/35859618&rfr_iscdi=true