Public participation, engagement, and climate change adaptation: A review of the research literature
There is a clear need for a state‐of‐the‐art review of how public participation in climate change adaptation is being considered in research across academic communities: The Rio Declaration developed in 1992 at the UN Conference on Environment and Development (UNCED) included explicit goals of citiz...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Wiley interdisciplinary reviews. Climate change 2020-07, Vol.11 (4), p.e645-n/a |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | n/a |
---|---|
container_issue | 4 |
container_start_page | e645 |
container_title | Wiley interdisciplinary reviews. Climate change |
container_volume | 11 |
creator | Hügel, Stephan Davies, Anna R. |
description | There is a clear need for a state‐of‐the‐art review of how public participation in climate change adaptation is being considered in research across academic communities: The Rio Declaration developed in 1992 at the UN Conference on Environment and Development (UNCED) included explicit goals of citizen participation and engagement in climate actions (Principle 10). Nation states were given special responsibility to facilitate these by ensuring access to information and opportunities to participate in decision‐making processes. Since then the need for public participation has featured prominently in calls to climate action. Using text analysis to produce a corpus of s drawn from Web of Science, a review of literature incorporating public participation and citizen engagement in climate change adaptation since 1992 reveals lexical, temporal, and spatial distribution dynamics of research on the topic. An exponential rise in research effort since the year 2000 is demonstrated, with the focus of research action on three substantial themes—risk, flood risk, and risk assessment, perception, and communication. These are critically reviewed and three substantive issues are considered: the paradox of participation, the challenge of governance transformation, and the need to incorporate psycho‐social and behavioral adaptation to climate change in policy processes. Gaps in current research include a lack of common understanding of public participation for climate adaptation across disciplines; incomplete articulation of processes involving public participation and citizen engagement; and a paucity of empirical research examining how understanding and usage of influential concepts of risk, vulnerability and adaptive capacity varies among different disciplines and stakeholders. Finally, a provisional research agenda for attending to these gaps is described.
This article is categorized under:
Vulnerability and Adaptation to Climate Change > Institutions for Adaptation
Policy and Governance > Governing Climate Change in Communities, Cities, and Regions
Number of publications per year relating to public engagement, public participation, or citizen engagement for climate change adaptation. The quadratic curve demonstrates that submissions in this subject area are currently more than doubling year‐on‐year. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1002/wcc.645 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_9285715</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2692753890</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4105-fdb2085d64a0cee0acf23e1e063e7d9136c1b93a0793499fb11e7c59a7e6c0cc3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kU9rFEEQxRtRTIjBr9DgQcFs7D_T090eAmHRRAjoQfHY1NTU7HaYnRm7Z7Lk29txQ0DBulQV9ePxisfYaynOpRDqwx7xvK7MM3YsrbEra71__jQ7ccROc74VpbRyzlUv2ZE2zvhaumPWfluaPiKfIM0R4wRzHIczTsMGNrSjYT7jMLQc-7iDmThuYdgQhxam-Q_6kV_yRHeR9nzs-LylsmWChFvex5kSzEuiV-xFB32m08d-wn58_vR9fb26-Xr1ZX15s8JKCrPq2kYJZ9q6AoFEArBTmiSJWpNtvdQ1ysZrENbryvuukZIsGg-WahSI-oRdHHSnpdlRi8V-gj5MqZhP92GEGP6-DHEbNuNd8MoZK00RePcokMZfC-U57GJG6nsYaFxyULVX1mjnRUHf_IPejksayntBVVIWf6quCvX2QGEac07UPZmRIjyEF0p4oYRXyPcHch97uv8fFn6u1w_0b4YWmfQ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2411499264</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Public participation, engagement, and climate change adaptation: A review of the research literature</title><source>Wiley-Blackwell Journals</source><source>PAIS Index</source><creator>Hügel, Stephan ; Davies, Anna R.</creator><creatorcontrib>Hügel, Stephan ; Davies, Anna R.</creatorcontrib><description>There is a clear need for a state‐of‐the‐art review of how public participation in climate change adaptation is being considered in research across academic communities: The Rio Declaration developed in 1992 at the UN Conference on Environment and Development (UNCED) included explicit goals of citizen participation and engagement in climate actions (Principle 10). Nation states were given special responsibility to facilitate these by ensuring access to information and opportunities to participate in decision‐making processes. Since then the need for public participation has featured prominently in calls to climate action. Using text analysis to produce a corpus of s drawn from Web of Science, a review of literature incorporating public participation and citizen engagement in climate change adaptation since 1992 reveals lexical, temporal, and spatial distribution dynamics of research on the topic. An exponential rise in research effort since the year 2000 is demonstrated, with the focus of research action on three substantial themes—risk, flood risk, and risk assessment, perception, and communication. These are critically reviewed and three substantive issues are considered: the paradox of participation, the challenge of governance transformation, and the need to incorporate psycho‐social and behavioral adaptation to climate change in policy processes. Gaps in current research include a lack of common understanding of public participation for climate adaptation across disciplines; incomplete articulation of processes involving public participation and citizen engagement; and a paucity of empirical research examining how understanding and usage of influential concepts of risk, vulnerability and adaptive capacity varies among different disciplines and stakeholders. Finally, a provisional research agenda for attending to these gaps is described.
This article is categorized under:
Vulnerability and Adaptation to Climate Change > Institutions for Adaptation
Policy and Governance > Governing Climate Change in Communities, Cities, and Regions
Number of publications per year relating to public engagement, public participation, or citizen engagement for climate change adaptation. The quadratic curve demonstrates that submissions in this subject area are currently more than doubling year‐on‐year.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1757-7780</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1757-7799</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1002/wcc.645</identifier><identifier>PMID: 35859618</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Hoboken, USA: John Wiley & Sons, Inc</publisher><subject>Access to information ; Action ; Adaptation ; Advanced Review ; Advanced Reviews ; citizen engagement ; Citizen participation ; Climate action ; Climate adaptation ; Climate change ; climate change adaptation ; Climatic analysis ; Decision making ; Empirical analysis ; Environmental policy ; Environmental risk ; Flood risk ; Governance ; Governing Climate Change in Communities, Cities, and Regions ; Information dissemination ; Institutions for Adaptation ; Literature reviews ; Nation states ; public engagement ; Public participation ; Research methodology ; Reviews ; Risk assessment ; Risk communication ; Risk perception ; Spatial analysis ; Spatial distribution</subject><ispartof>Wiley interdisciplinary reviews. Climate change, 2020-07, Vol.11 (4), p.e645-n/a</ispartof><rights>2020 The Authors. published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc.</rights><rights>2020. This article is published under http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4105-fdb2085d64a0cee0acf23e1e063e7d9136c1b93a0793499fb11e7c59a7e6c0cc3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4105-fdb2085d64a0cee0acf23e1e063e7d9136c1b93a0793499fb11e7c59a7e6c0cc3</cites><orcidid>0000-0003-4379-2450</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1002%2Fwcc.645$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1002%2Fwcc.645$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,776,780,881,1411,27845,27903,27904,45553,45554</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Hügel, Stephan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Davies, Anna R.</creatorcontrib><title>Public participation, engagement, and climate change adaptation: A review of the research literature</title><title>Wiley interdisciplinary reviews. Climate change</title><description>There is a clear need for a state‐of‐the‐art review of how public participation in climate change adaptation is being considered in research across academic communities: The Rio Declaration developed in 1992 at the UN Conference on Environment and Development (UNCED) included explicit goals of citizen participation and engagement in climate actions (Principle 10). Nation states were given special responsibility to facilitate these by ensuring access to information and opportunities to participate in decision‐making processes. Since then the need for public participation has featured prominently in calls to climate action. Using text analysis to produce a corpus of s drawn from Web of Science, a review of literature incorporating public participation and citizen engagement in climate change adaptation since 1992 reveals lexical, temporal, and spatial distribution dynamics of research on the topic. An exponential rise in research effort since the year 2000 is demonstrated, with the focus of research action on three substantial themes—risk, flood risk, and risk assessment, perception, and communication. These are critically reviewed and three substantive issues are considered: the paradox of participation, the challenge of governance transformation, and the need to incorporate psycho‐social and behavioral adaptation to climate change in policy processes. Gaps in current research include a lack of common understanding of public participation for climate adaptation across disciplines; incomplete articulation of processes involving public participation and citizen engagement; and a paucity of empirical research examining how understanding and usage of influential concepts of risk, vulnerability and adaptive capacity varies among different disciplines and stakeholders. Finally, a provisional research agenda for attending to these gaps is described.
This article is categorized under:
Vulnerability and Adaptation to Climate Change > Institutions for Adaptation
Policy and Governance > Governing Climate Change in Communities, Cities, and Regions
Number of publications per year relating to public engagement, public participation, or citizen engagement for climate change adaptation. The quadratic curve demonstrates that submissions in this subject area are currently more than doubling year‐on‐year.</description><subject>Access to information</subject><subject>Action</subject><subject>Adaptation</subject><subject>Advanced Review</subject><subject>Advanced Reviews</subject><subject>citizen engagement</subject><subject>Citizen participation</subject><subject>Climate action</subject><subject>Climate adaptation</subject><subject>Climate change</subject><subject>climate change adaptation</subject><subject>Climatic analysis</subject><subject>Decision making</subject><subject>Empirical analysis</subject><subject>Environmental policy</subject><subject>Environmental risk</subject><subject>Flood risk</subject><subject>Governance</subject><subject>Governing Climate Change in Communities, Cities, and Regions</subject><subject>Information dissemination</subject><subject>Institutions for Adaptation</subject><subject>Literature reviews</subject><subject>Nation states</subject><subject>public engagement</subject><subject>Public participation</subject><subject>Research methodology</subject><subject>Reviews</subject><subject>Risk assessment</subject><subject>Risk communication</subject><subject>Risk perception</subject><subject>Spatial analysis</subject><subject>Spatial distribution</subject><issn>1757-7780</issn><issn>1757-7799</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2020</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>24P</sourceid><sourceid>WIN</sourceid><sourceid>7TQ</sourceid><recordid>eNp1kU9rFEEQxRtRTIjBr9DgQcFs7D_T090eAmHRRAjoQfHY1NTU7HaYnRm7Z7Lk29txQ0DBulQV9ePxisfYaynOpRDqwx7xvK7MM3YsrbEra71__jQ7ccROc74VpbRyzlUv2ZE2zvhaumPWfluaPiKfIM0R4wRzHIczTsMGNrSjYT7jMLQc-7iDmThuYdgQhxam-Q_6kV_yRHeR9nzs-LylsmWChFvex5kSzEuiV-xFB32m08d-wn58_vR9fb26-Xr1ZX15s8JKCrPq2kYJZ9q6AoFEArBTmiSJWpNtvdQ1ysZrENbryvuukZIsGg-WahSI-oRdHHSnpdlRi8V-gj5MqZhP92GEGP6-DHEbNuNd8MoZK00RePcokMZfC-U57GJG6nsYaFxyULVX1mjnRUHf_IPejksayntBVVIWf6quCvX2QGEac07UPZmRIjyEF0p4oYRXyPcHch97uv8fFn6u1w_0b4YWmfQ</recordid><startdate>202007</startdate><enddate>202007</enddate><creator>Hügel, Stephan</creator><creator>Davies, Anna R.</creator><general>John Wiley & Sons, Inc</general><general>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</general><scope>24P</scope><scope>WIN</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7ST</scope><scope>7TG</scope><scope>7TQ</scope><scope>7U6</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>DHY</scope><scope>DON</scope><scope>KL.</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4379-2450</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>202007</creationdate><title>Public participation, engagement, and climate change adaptation: A review of the research literature</title><author>Hügel, Stephan ; Davies, Anna R.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4105-fdb2085d64a0cee0acf23e1e063e7d9136c1b93a0793499fb11e7c59a7e6c0cc3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2020</creationdate><topic>Access to information</topic><topic>Action</topic><topic>Adaptation</topic><topic>Advanced Review</topic><topic>Advanced Reviews</topic><topic>citizen engagement</topic><topic>Citizen participation</topic><topic>Climate action</topic><topic>Climate adaptation</topic><topic>Climate change</topic><topic>climate change adaptation</topic><topic>Climatic analysis</topic><topic>Decision making</topic><topic>Empirical analysis</topic><topic>Environmental policy</topic><topic>Environmental risk</topic><topic>Flood risk</topic><topic>Governance</topic><topic>Governing Climate Change in Communities, Cities, and Regions</topic><topic>Information dissemination</topic><topic>Institutions for Adaptation</topic><topic>Literature reviews</topic><topic>Nation states</topic><topic>public engagement</topic><topic>Public participation</topic><topic>Research methodology</topic><topic>Reviews</topic><topic>Risk assessment</topic><topic>Risk communication</topic><topic>Risk perception</topic><topic>Spatial analysis</topic><topic>Spatial distribution</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Hügel, Stephan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Davies, Anna R.</creatorcontrib><collection>Wiley Open Access Journals</collection><collection>Wiley-Blackwell Backfiles (Open access)</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Meteorological & Geoastrophysical Abstracts</collection><collection>PAIS Index</collection><collection>Sustainability Science Abstracts</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>PAIS International</collection><collection>PAIS International (Ovid)</collection><collection>Meteorological & Geoastrophysical Abstracts - Academic</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>Wiley interdisciplinary reviews. Climate change</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Hügel, Stephan</au><au>Davies, Anna R.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Public participation, engagement, and climate change adaptation: A review of the research literature</atitle><jtitle>Wiley interdisciplinary reviews. Climate change</jtitle><date>2020-07</date><risdate>2020</risdate><volume>11</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>e645</spage><epage>n/a</epage><pages>e645-n/a</pages><issn>1757-7780</issn><eissn>1757-7799</eissn><abstract>There is a clear need for a state‐of‐the‐art review of how public participation in climate change adaptation is being considered in research across academic communities: The Rio Declaration developed in 1992 at the UN Conference on Environment and Development (UNCED) included explicit goals of citizen participation and engagement in climate actions (Principle 10). Nation states were given special responsibility to facilitate these by ensuring access to information and opportunities to participate in decision‐making processes. Since then the need for public participation has featured prominently in calls to climate action. Using text analysis to produce a corpus of s drawn from Web of Science, a review of literature incorporating public participation and citizen engagement in climate change adaptation since 1992 reveals lexical, temporal, and spatial distribution dynamics of research on the topic. An exponential rise in research effort since the year 2000 is demonstrated, with the focus of research action on three substantial themes—risk, flood risk, and risk assessment, perception, and communication. These are critically reviewed and three substantive issues are considered: the paradox of participation, the challenge of governance transformation, and the need to incorporate psycho‐social and behavioral adaptation to climate change in policy processes. Gaps in current research include a lack of common understanding of public participation for climate adaptation across disciplines; incomplete articulation of processes involving public participation and citizen engagement; and a paucity of empirical research examining how understanding and usage of influential concepts of risk, vulnerability and adaptive capacity varies among different disciplines and stakeholders. Finally, a provisional research agenda for attending to these gaps is described.
This article is categorized under:
Vulnerability and Adaptation to Climate Change > Institutions for Adaptation
Policy and Governance > Governing Climate Change in Communities, Cities, and Regions
Number of publications per year relating to public engagement, public participation, or citizen engagement for climate change adaptation. The quadratic curve demonstrates that submissions in this subject area are currently more than doubling year‐on‐year.</abstract><cop>Hoboken, USA</cop><pub>John Wiley & Sons, Inc</pub><pmid>35859618</pmid><doi>10.1002/wcc.645</doi><tpages>20</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4379-2450</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1757-7780 |
ispartof | Wiley interdisciplinary reviews. Climate change, 2020-07, Vol.11 (4), p.e645-n/a |
issn | 1757-7780 1757-7799 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_9285715 |
source | Wiley-Blackwell Journals; PAIS Index |
subjects | Access to information Action Adaptation Advanced Review Advanced Reviews citizen engagement Citizen participation Climate action Climate adaptation Climate change climate change adaptation Climatic analysis Decision making Empirical analysis Environmental policy Environmental risk Flood risk Governance Governing Climate Change in Communities, Cities, and Regions Information dissemination Institutions for Adaptation Literature reviews Nation states public engagement Public participation Research methodology Reviews Risk assessment Risk communication Risk perception Spatial analysis Spatial distribution |
title | Public participation, engagement, and climate change adaptation: A review of the research literature |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-22T16%3A20%3A41IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Public%20participation,%20engagement,%20and%20climate%20change%20adaptation:%20A%20review%20of%20the%20research%20literature&rft.jtitle=Wiley%20interdisciplinary%20reviews.%20Climate%20change&rft.au=H%C3%BCgel,%20Stephan&rft.date=2020-07&rft.volume=11&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=e645&rft.epage=n/a&rft.pages=e645-n/a&rft.issn=1757-7780&rft.eissn=1757-7799&rft_id=info:doi/10.1002/wcc.645&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E2692753890%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2411499264&rft_id=info:pmid/35859618&rfr_iscdi=true |