Evaluation of Rituximab for Induction and Maintenance Therapy in Patients 75 Years and Older With Antineutrophil Cytoplasmic Antibody–Associated Vasculitis

Importance Older patients are underrepresented in studies of rituximab for the treatment of antineutrophil cytoplasmic antibody (ANCA)–associated vasculitis. Little is known about outcomes and adverse events associated with the use of rituximab therapy among patients 75 years and older with ANCA-associated vasculitis. Objective To examine outcomes and adverse events associated with the use of rituximab therapy in patients 75 years and older with ANCA-associated vasculitis, specifically granulomatosis with polyangiitis (GPA) or microscopic polyangiitis (MPA). Design, Setting, and Participants This multicenter cohort study involved 93 patients 75 years and older with ANCA-associated vasculitis from 36 university and nonuniversity hospitals in France. Data were obtained from the French Vasculitis Study Group database between January 1, 2000, and July 1, 2018, and a call for observation sent to French Vasculitis Study Group members on June 6, 2019. Data analysis was performed from November 15 to December 31, 2021. Inclusion criteria included a diagnosis of GPA or MPA according to European Medicines Agency classification criteria and receipt of treatment with rituximab after age 75 years. Patients were excluded if they were missing relevant clinical or biological data. Data on race and ethnicity were not reported because inclusion of this information was not authorized by the ethics committee. Exposure At least 1 infusion of rituximab as induction or maintenance therapy. Main Outcomes and Measures Occurrence of remission, relapse, drug discontinuation, death, and serious infections (including types of serious infections). Results Of 238 patients screened, 93 were included (median [IQR] age, 79.4 [76.7-83.1] years; 51 women [54.8%]); 52 patients (55.9%) had a diagnosis of GPA, and 41 (44.1%) had a diagnosis of MPA. Thirty patients (32.3%) received rituximab as induction therapy in combination with high-dose glucocorticoid regimens, 27 (29.0%) received rituximab as maintenance therapy, and 36 (38.7%) received rituximab as both induction and maintenance therapy. The median (IQR) follow-up was 2.3 (1.1-4.0) years. Among 66 patients who received rituximab as induction therapy, 57 (86.4%) achieved remission, and 2 (3.0%) experienced relapses. The incidence of serious infection was significantly higher when rituximab was used as induction therapy vs maintenance therapy (46.6 [95% CI, 24.8-79.7] per 100 patient-years vs 8.4 [95% CI, 3.8-15.9] per 100 patient-years;P =