Evaluation of Cough Medication Use Patterns in Ambulatory Care Settings in the United States: 2003-2018

Using 2003−2018 National Ambulatory Medical Care Survey data for office-based visits and 2003−2018 National Hospital Ambulatory Medical Care Survey data for emergency department (ED) visits, we conducted cross-sectional analyses to examine cough medication (CM) use trends in the United States (US) a...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of clinical medicine 2022-06, Vol.11 (13), p.3671
Hauptverfasser: Yang, Seonkyeong, Hincapie-Castillo, Juan M, Ke, Xuehua, Schelfhout, Jonathan, Ding, Helen, Sher, Mandel R, Zhou, Lili, Chang, Ching-Yuan, Wilson, Debbie L, Lo-Ciganic, Wei-Hsuan
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page
container_issue 13
container_start_page 3671
container_title Journal of clinical medicine
container_volume 11
creator Yang, Seonkyeong
Hincapie-Castillo, Juan M
Ke, Xuehua
Schelfhout, Jonathan
Ding, Helen
Sher, Mandel R
Zhou, Lili
Chang, Ching-Yuan
Wilson, Debbie L
Lo-Ciganic, Wei-Hsuan
description Using 2003−2018 National Ambulatory Medical Care Survey data for office-based visits and 2003−2018 National Hospital Ambulatory Medical Care Survey data for emergency department (ED) visits, we conducted cross-sectional analyses to examine cough medication (CM) use trends in the United States (US) ambulatory care settings. We included adult (≥18 years) patient visits with respiratory-infection-related or non-infection-related cough as reason-for-visit or diagnosis without malignant cancer or benign respiratory tumor diagnoses. Using multivariable logistic regressions, we examined opioid antitussive, benzonatate, dextromethorphan-containing antitussive, and gabapentinoid use trends. From 2003−2005 to 2015−2018, opioid antitussive use decreased in office-based visits (8.8% to 6.4%, Ptrend = 0.03) but remained stable in ED visits (6.3% to 5.9%, Ptrend = 0.99). In both settings, hydrocodone-containing antitussive use declined over 50%. Benzonatate use more than tripled (office-based:1.6% to 4.8%; ED:1.5% to 8.0%; both Ptrend < 0.001). Dextromethorphan-containing antitussive use increased in ED visits (1.8% to 2.6%, Ptrend = 0.003) but stayed unchanged in office-based visits (3.8% to 2.7%; Ptrend = 0.60). Gabapentinoid use doubled in office-based visits (1.1% in 2006−2008 to 2.4% in 2015−2018, Ptrend < 0.001) but was negligible in ED visits. In US office-based and ED ambulatory care settings, hydrocodone-containing antitussive use substantially declined from 2003 to 2018, while benzonatate use more than tripled, and dextromethorphan-containing antitussive and gabapentinoid use remained low (
doi_str_mv 10.3390/jcm11133671
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_9267927</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2687727841</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c409t-1578e834412ed1e3e54c838627c05dfadc3ad800cf9110879630e8bd190e990f3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpdkd9rFDEQx4MottQ--S4BXwRZnSS7-eGDUI76AyoK9Z5DLjt7l2M3qUm20P_erVfL6bzMMPPhy3f4EvKSwTshDLzf-4kxJoRU7Ak55aBUA0KLp0fzCTkvZQ9Lad1ypp6TE9FpkKaTp2R7eevG2dWQIk0DXaV5u6PfsA_-sFsXpD9crZhjoSHSi2kzj66mfEdXLiO9xlpD3P651R3SdQwVe3pdXcXygXIA0XBg-gV5Nrix4PlDPyPrT5c_V1-aq--fv64urhrfgqkN65RGLdqWcewZCuxar4WWXHno-sH1XrheA_jBMAZaGSkA9aZnBtAYGMQZ-XjQvZk3E_YeY81utDc5TC7f2eSC_fcSw85u0601XCrD1SLw5kEgp18zlmqnUDyOo4uY5mK51EpxpVu2oK__Q_dpznF5756SwLWUeqHeHiifUykZh0czDOx9hvYow4V-dez_kf2bmPgNfmSVQw</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2686028668</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Evaluation of Cough Medication Use Patterns in Ambulatory Care Settings in the United States: 2003-2018</title><source>PubMed Central Open Access</source><source>MDPI - Multidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute</source><source>EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals</source><source>PubMed Central</source><creator>Yang, Seonkyeong ; Hincapie-Castillo, Juan M ; Ke, Xuehua ; Schelfhout, Jonathan ; Ding, Helen ; Sher, Mandel R ; Zhou, Lili ; Chang, Ching-Yuan ; Wilson, Debbie L ; Lo-Ciganic, Wei-Hsuan</creator><creatorcontrib>Yang, Seonkyeong ; Hincapie-Castillo, Juan M ; Ke, Xuehua ; Schelfhout, Jonathan ; Ding, Helen ; Sher, Mandel R ; Zhou, Lili ; Chang, Ching-Yuan ; Wilson, Debbie L ; Lo-Ciganic, Wei-Hsuan</creatorcontrib><description>Using 2003−2018 National Ambulatory Medical Care Survey data for office-based visits and 2003−2018 National Hospital Ambulatory Medical Care Survey data for emergency department (ED) visits, we conducted cross-sectional analyses to examine cough medication (CM) use trends in the United States (US) ambulatory care settings. We included adult (≥18 years) patient visits with respiratory-infection-related or non-infection-related cough as reason-for-visit or diagnosis without malignant cancer or benign respiratory tumor diagnoses. Using multivariable logistic regressions, we examined opioid antitussive, benzonatate, dextromethorphan-containing antitussive, and gabapentinoid use trends. From 2003−2005 to 2015−2018, opioid antitussive use decreased in office-based visits (8.8% to 6.4%, Ptrend = 0.03) but remained stable in ED visits (6.3% to 5.9%, Ptrend = 0.99). In both settings, hydrocodone-containing antitussive use declined over 50%. Benzonatate use more than tripled (office-based:1.6% to 4.8%; ED:1.5% to 8.0%; both Ptrend &lt; 0.001). Dextromethorphan-containing antitussive use increased in ED visits (1.8% to 2.6%, Ptrend = 0.003) but stayed unchanged in office-based visits (3.8% to 2.7%; Ptrend = 0.60). Gabapentinoid use doubled in office-based visits (1.1% in 2006−2008 to 2.4% in 2015−2018, Ptrend &lt; 0.001) but was negligible in ED visits. In US office-based and ED ambulatory care settings, hydrocodone-containing antitussive use substantially declined from 2003 to 2018, while benzonatate use more than tripled, and dextromethorphan-containing antitussive and gabapentinoid use remained low (&lt;3%).</description><identifier>ISSN: 2077-0383</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2077-0383</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.3390/jcm11133671</identifier><identifier>PMID: 35806956</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Switzerland: MDPI AG</publisher><subject>Ambulatory care ; Analgesics ; Bronchitis ; Cancer therapies ; Chronic illnesses ; Clinical medicine ; Codes ; Electronic health records ; FDA approval ; Morphine ; Narcotics ; Patients ; Physicians ; Trends</subject><ispartof>Journal of clinical medicine, 2022-06, Vol.11 (13), p.3671</ispartof><rights>2022 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><rights>2022 by the authors. 2022</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c409t-1578e834412ed1e3e54c838627c05dfadc3ad800cf9110879630e8bd190e990f3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c409t-1578e834412ed1e3e54c838627c05dfadc3ad800cf9110879630e8bd190e990f3</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-1640-5497 ; 0000-0001-6590-4770 ; 0000-0002-5198-8544</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9267927/pdf/$$EPDF$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9267927/$$EHTML$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,315,728,781,785,886,27929,27930,53796,53798</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35806956$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Yang, Seonkyeong</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hincapie-Castillo, Juan M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ke, Xuehua</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Schelfhout, Jonathan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ding, Helen</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sher, Mandel R</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zhou, Lili</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chang, Ching-Yuan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wilson, Debbie L</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lo-Ciganic, Wei-Hsuan</creatorcontrib><title>Evaluation of Cough Medication Use Patterns in Ambulatory Care Settings in the United States: 2003-2018</title><title>Journal of clinical medicine</title><addtitle>J Clin Med</addtitle><description>Using 2003−2018 National Ambulatory Medical Care Survey data for office-based visits and 2003−2018 National Hospital Ambulatory Medical Care Survey data for emergency department (ED) visits, we conducted cross-sectional analyses to examine cough medication (CM) use trends in the United States (US) ambulatory care settings. We included adult (≥18 years) patient visits with respiratory-infection-related or non-infection-related cough as reason-for-visit or diagnosis without malignant cancer or benign respiratory tumor diagnoses. Using multivariable logistic regressions, we examined opioid antitussive, benzonatate, dextromethorphan-containing antitussive, and gabapentinoid use trends. From 2003−2005 to 2015−2018, opioid antitussive use decreased in office-based visits (8.8% to 6.4%, Ptrend = 0.03) but remained stable in ED visits (6.3% to 5.9%, Ptrend = 0.99). In both settings, hydrocodone-containing antitussive use declined over 50%. Benzonatate use more than tripled (office-based:1.6% to 4.8%; ED:1.5% to 8.0%; both Ptrend &lt; 0.001). Dextromethorphan-containing antitussive use increased in ED visits (1.8% to 2.6%, Ptrend = 0.003) but stayed unchanged in office-based visits (3.8% to 2.7%; Ptrend = 0.60). Gabapentinoid use doubled in office-based visits (1.1% in 2006−2008 to 2.4% in 2015−2018, Ptrend &lt; 0.001) but was negligible in ED visits. In US office-based and ED ambulatory care settings, hydrocodone-containing antitussive use substantially declined from 2003 to 2018, while benzonatate use more than tripled, and dextromethorphan-containing antitussive and gabapentinoid use remained low (&lt;3%).</description><subject>Ambulatory care</subject><subject>Analgesics</subject><subject>Bronchitis</subject><subject>Cancer therapies</subject><subject>Chronic illnesses</subject><subject>Clinical medicine</subject><subject>Codes</subject><subject>Electronic health records</subject><subject>FDA approval</subject><subject>Morphine</subject><subject>Narcotics</subject><subject>Patients</subject><subject>Physicians</subject><subject>Trends</subject><issn>2077-0383</issn><issn>2077-0383</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2022</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><recordid>eNpdkd9rFDEQx4MottQ--S4BXwRZnSS7-eGDUI76AyoK9Z5DLjt7l2M3qUm20P_erVfL6bzMMPPhy3f4EvKSwTshDLzf-4kxJoRU7Ak55aBUA0KLp0fzCTkvZQ9Lad1ypp6TE9FpkKaTp2R7eevG2dWQIk0DXaV5u6PfsA_-sFsXpD9crZhjoSHSi2kzj66mfEdXLiO9xlpD3P651R3SdQwVe3pdXcXygXIA0XBg-gV5Nrix4PlDPyPrT5c_V1-aq--fv64urhrfgqkN65RGLdqWcewZCuxar4WWXHno-sH1XrheA_jBMAZaGSkA9aZnBtAYGMQZ-XjQvZk3E_YeY81utDc5TC7f2eSC_fcSw85u0601XCrD1SLw5kEgp18zlmqnUDyOo4uY5mK51EpxpVu2oK__Q_dpznF5756SwLWUeqHeHiifUykZh0czDOx9hvYow4V-dez_kf2bmPgNfmSVQw</recordid><startdate>20220625</startdate><enddate>20220625</enddate><creator>Yang, Seonkyeong</creator><creator>Hincapie-Castillo, Juan M</creator><creator>Ke, Xuehua</creator><creator>Schelfhout, Jonathan</creator><creator>Ding, Helen</creator><creator>Sher, Mandel R</creator><creator>Zhou, Lili</creator><creator>Chang, Ching-Yuan</creator><creator>Wilson, Debbie L</creator><creator>Lo-Ciganic, Wei-Hsuan</creator><general>MDPI AG</general><general>MDPI</general><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1640-5497</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6590-4770</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5198-8544</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20220625</creationdate><title>Evaluation of Cough Medication Use Patterns in Ambulatory Care Settings in the United States: 2003-2018</title><author>Yang, Seonkyeong ; Hincapie-Castillo, Juan M ; Ke, Xuehua ; Schelfhout, Jonathan ; Ding, Helen ; Sher, Mandel R ; Zhou, Lili ; Chang, Ching-Yuan ; Wilson, Debbie L ; Lo-Ciganic, Wei-Hsuan</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c409t-1578e834412ed1e3e54c838627c05dfadc3ad800cf9110879630e8bd190e990f3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2022</creationdate><topic>Ambulatory care</topic><topic>Analgesics</topic><topic>Bronchitis</topic><topic>Cancer therapies</topic><topic>Chronic illnesses</topic><topic>Clinical medicine</topic><topic>Codes</topic><topic>Electronic health records</topic><topic>FDA approval</topic><topic>Morphine</topic><topic>Narcotics</topic><topic>Patients</topic><topic>Physicians</topic><topic>Trends</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Yang, Seonkyeong</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hincapie-Castillo, Juan M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ke, Xuehua</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Schelfhout, Jonathan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ding, Helen</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sher, Mandel R</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zhou, Lili</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chang, Ching-Yuan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wilson, Debbie L</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lo-Ciganic, Wei-Hsuan</creatorcontrib><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Access via ProQuest (Open Access)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>Journal of clinical medicine</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Yang, Seonkyeong</au><au>Hincapie-Castillo, Juan M</au><au>Ke, Xuehua</au><au>Schelfhout, Jonathan</au><au>Ding, Helen</au><au>Sher, Mandel R</au><au>Zhou, Lili</au><au>Chang, Ching-Yuan</au><au>Wilson, Debbie L</au><au>Lo-Ciganic, Wei-Hsuan</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Evaluation of Cough Medication Use Patterns in Ambulatory Care Settings in the United States: 2003-2018</atitle><jtitle>Journal of clinical medicine</jtitle><addtitle>J Clin Med</addtitle><date>2022-06-25</date><risdate>2022</risdate><volume>11</volume><issue>13</issue><spage>3671</spage><pages>3671-</pages><issn>2077-0383</issn><eissn>2077-0383</eissn><abstract>Using 2003−2018 National Ambulatory Medical Care Survey data for office-based visits and 2003−2018 National Hospital Ambulatory Medical Care Survey data for emergency department (ED) visits, we conducted cross-sectional analyses to examine cough medication (CM) use trends in the United States (US) ambulatory care settings. We included adult (≥18 years) patient visits with respiratory-infection-related or non-infection-related cough as reason-for-visit or diagnosis without malignant cancer or benign respiratory tumor diagnoses. Using multivariable logistic regressions, we examined opioid antitussive, benzonatate, dextromethorphan-containing antitussive, and gabapentinoid use trends. From 2003−2005 to 2015−2018, opioid antitussive use decreased in office-based visits (8.8% to 6.4%, Ptrend = 0.03) but remained stable in ED visits (6.3% to 5.9%, Ptrend = 0.99). In both settings, hydrocodone-containing antitussive use declined over 50%. Benzonatate use more than tripled (office-based:1.6% to 4.8%; ED:1.5% to 8.0%; both Ptrend &lt; 0.001). Dextromethorphan-containing antitussive use increased in ED visits (1.8% to 2.6%, Ptrend = 0.003) but stayed unchanged in office-based visits (3.8% to 2.7%; Ptrend = 0.60). Gabapentinoid use doubled in office-based visits (1.1% in 2006−2008 to 2.4% in 2015−2018, Ptrend &lt; 0.001) but was negligible in ED visits. In US office-based and ED ambulatory care settings, hydrocodone-containing antitussive use substantially declined from 2003 to 2018, while benzonatate use more than tripled, and dextromethorphan-containing antitussive and gabapentinoid use remained low (&lt;3%).</abstract><cop>Switzerland</cop><pub>MDPI AG</pub><pmid>35806956</pmid><doi>10.3390/jcm11133671</doi><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1640-5497</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6590-4770</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5198-8544</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 2077-0383
ispartof Journal of clinical medicine, 2022-06, Vol.11 (13), p.3671
issn 2077-0383
2077-0383
language eng
recordid cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_9267927
source PubMed Central Open Access; MDPI - Multidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute; EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals; PubMed Central
subjects Ambulatory care
Analgesics
Bronchitis
Cancer therapies
Chronic illnesses
Clinical medicine
Codes
Electronic health records
FDA approval
Morphine
Narcotics
Patients
Physicians
Trends
title Evaluation of Cough Medication Use Patterns in Ambulatory Care Settings in the United States: 2003-2018
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-11T14%3A04%3A53IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Evaluation%20of%20Cough%20Medication%20Use%20Patterns%20in%20Ambulatory%20Care%20Settings%20in%20the%20United%20States:%202003-2018&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20clinical%20medicine&rft.au=Yang,%20Seonkyeong&rft.date=2022-06-25&rft.volume=11&rft.issue=13&rft.spage=3671&rft.pages=3671-&rft.issn=2077-0383&rft.eissn=2077-0383&rft_id=info:doi/10.3390/jcm11133671&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E2687727841%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2686028668&rft_id=info:pmid/35806956&rfr_iscdi=true