The Role of Humeral Neck-Shaft Angle in Reverse Total Shoulder Arthroplasty: 155° versus <155°—A Systematic Review

The aim of this study was to have updated scrutiny of the influence of the humeral neck-shaft angle (HNSA) in patients who underwent reverse shoulder arthroplasty (RSA). A PRISMA-guided literature search was conducted from May to September 2021. Clinical outcome scores, functional parameters, and an...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of clinical medicine 2022-06, Vol.11 (13), p.3641
Hauptverfasser: Longo, Umile Giuseppe, Gulotta, Lawrence V, De Salvatore, Sergio, Berton, Alessandra, Piergentili, Ilaria, Bandini, Benedetta, Lalli, Alberto, Denaro, Vincenzo
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page
container_issue 13
container_start_page 3641
container_title Journal of clinical medicine
container_volume 11
creator Longo, Umile Giuseppe
Gulotta, Lawrence V
De Salvatore, Sergio
Berton, Alessandra
Piergentili, Ilaria
Bandini, Benedetta
Lalli, Alberto
Denaro, Vincenzo
description The aim of this study was to have updated scrutiny of the influence of the humeral neck-shaft angle (HNSA) in patients who underwent reverse shoulder arthroplasty (RSA). A PRISMA-guided literature search was conducted from May to September 2021. Clinical outcome scores, functional parameters, and any complications were reviewed. Eleven papers were identified for inclusion in this systematic review. A total of 971 shoulders were evaluated at a minimum-follow up of 12 months, and a maximum of 120 months. The sample size for the "HNSA 155°" group is 449 patients, the "HNSA 145°" group involves 140 patients, and the "HSNA 135°" group comprises 291 patients. The HNSA represents an important variable in choosing the RSA implant design for patients with rotator cuff arthropathy. Positive outcomes are described for all the 155°, 145°, and 135° HSNA groups. Among the different implant designs, the 155° group show a better SST score, but also the highest rate of revisions and scapular notching; the 145° cohort achieve the best values in terms of active forward flexion, abduction, ASES score, and CMS, but also the highest rate of infections; while the 135° design obtains the best results in the external rotation with arm at side, but also the highest rate of fractures. High-quality studies are required to obtain valid results regarding the best prosthesis implant.
doi_str_mv 10.3390/jcm11133641
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_9267919</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2687728027</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c339t-d6cbe2577f14aa6cbbc0ee43141b84288843728b1e659567be652840528978d43</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpdkc9q3DAQxkVpSUKaU-5F0EuhONUf25JLKSyhbQohgezmLGTtOPbWtjaSvGVveYg8SJ-hj5InqdzdhE100MwwPz6-j0HomJITzgvyaWE6SinneUpfoQNGhEgIl_z1Tr-PjrxfkPikTBkVe2ifZ5LkBRMHaDWrAV_ZFrCt8NnQgdMtvgDzK5nWugp40t_EXdPjK1iB84BnNkRiWtuhnYPDExdqZ5et9mH9GdMs-_sHj-Dg8Zf_08Pd_QRP1z5Ap0NjRp0Gfr9Fbyrdejja1kN0_f3b7PQsOb_88fN0cp6YmC4k89yUwDIhKppqHYfSEICU05SWMYuMgbhgsqSQZ0WWizJWJlMSv0LIecoP0deN7nIoO5gb6EMMqJau6bRbK6sb9XzTN7W6sStVsFwUtIgCH7YCzt4O4IPqGm-gbXUPdvCK5VJEB4SJiL5_gS7s4PoYb6RykkXDI_VxQxlnvXdQPZmhRI0nVTsnjfS7Xf9P7OMB-T-whZz1</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2686054287</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>The Role of Humeral Neck-Shaft Angle in Reverse Total Shoulder Arthroplasty: 155° versus &lt;155°—A Systematic Review</title><source>PubMed Central Open Access</source><source>MDPI - Multidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute</source><source>EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals</source><source>PubMed Central</source><creator>Longo, Umile Giuseppe ; Gulotta, Lawrence V ; De Salvatore, Sergio ; Berton, Alessandra ; Piergentili, Ilaria ; Bandini, Benedetta ; Lalli, Alberto ; Denaro, Vincenzo</creator><creatorcontrib>Longo, Umile Giuseppe ; Gulotta, Lawrence V ; De Salvatore, Sergio ; Berton, Alessandra ; Piergentili, Ilaria ; Bandini, Benedetta ; Lalli, Alberto ; Denaro, Vincenzo</creatorcontrib><description>The aim of this study was to have updated scrutiny of the influence of the humeral neck-shaft angle (HNSA) in patients who underwent reverse shoulder arthroplasty (RSA). A PRISMA-guided literature search was conducted from May to September 2021. Clinical outcome scores, functional parameters, and any complications were reviewed. Eleven papers were identified for inclusion in this systematic review. A total of 971 shoulders were evaluated at a minimum-follow up of 12 months, and a maximum of 120 months. The sample size for the "HNSA 155°" group is 449 patients, the "HNSA 145°" group involves 140 patients, and the "HSNA 135°" group comprises 291 patients. The HNSA represents an important variable in choosing the RSA implant design for patients with rotator cuff arthropathy. Positive outcomes are described for all the 155°, 145°, and 135° HSNA groups. Among the different implant designs, the 155° group show a better SST score, but also the highest rate of revisions and scapular notching; the 145° cohort achieve the best values in terms of active forward flexion, abduction, ASES score, and CMS, but also the highest rate of infections; while the 135° design obtains the best results in the external rotation with arm at side, but also the highest rate of fractures. High-quality studies are required to obtain valid results regarding the best prosthesis implant.</description><identifier>ISSN: 2077-0383</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2077-0383</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.3390/jcm11133641</identifier><identifier>PMID: 35806927</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Switzerland: MDPI AG</publisher><subject>Clinical medicine ; Gender ; Joint replacement surgery ; Neck ; Prostheses ; Review ; Rotator cuff ; Shoulder ; Systematic review</subject><ispartof>Journal of clinical medicine, 2022-06, Vol.11 (13), p.3641</ispartof><rights>2022 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><rights>2022 by the authors. 2022</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c339t-d6cbe2577f14aa6cbbc0ee43141b84288843728b1e659567be652840528978d43</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c339t-d6cbe2577f14aa6cbbc0ee43141b84288843728b1e659567be652840528978d43</cites><orcidid>0000-0001-5909-3887 ; 0000-0002-9111-3638</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9267919/pdf/$$EPDF$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9267919/$$EHTML$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,727,780,784,885,27922,27923,53789,53791</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35806927$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Longo, Umile Giuseppe</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gulotta, Lawrence V</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>De Salvatore, Sergio</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Berton, Alessandra</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Piergentili, Ilaria</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bandini, Benedetta</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lalli, Alberto</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Denaro, Vincenzo</creatorcontrib><title>The Role of Humeral Neck-Shaft Angle in Reverse Total Shoulder Arthroplasty: 155° versus &lt;155°—A Systematic Review</title><title>Journal of clinical medicine</title><addtitle>J Clin Med</addtitle><description>The aim of this study was to have updated scrutiny of the influence of the humeral neck-shaft angle (HNSA) in patients who underwent reverse shoulder arthroplasty (RSA). A PRISMA-guided literature search was conducted from May to September 2021. Clinical outcome scores, functional parameters, and any complications were reviewed. Eleven papers were identified for inclusion in this systematic review. A total of 971 shoulders were evaluated at a minimum-follow up of 12 months, and a maximum of 120 months. The sample size for the "HNSA 155°" group is 449 patients, the "HNSA 145°" group involves 140 patients, and the "HSNA 135°" group comprises 291 patients. The HNSA represents an important variable in choosing the RSA implant design for patients with rotator cuff arthropathy. Positive outcomes are described for all the 155°, 145°, and 135° HSNA groups. Among the different implant designs, the 155° group show a better SST score, but also the highest rate of revisions and scapular notching; the 145° cohort achieve the best values in terms of active forward flexion, abduction, ASES score, and CMS, but also the highest rate of infections; while the 135° design obtains the best results in the external rotation with arm at side, but also the highest rate of fractures. High-quality studies are required to obtain valid results regarding the best prosthesis implant.</description><subject>Clinical medicine</subject><subject>Gender</subject><subject>Joint replacement surgery</subject><subject>Neck</subject><subject>Prostheses</subject><subject>Review</subject><subject>Rotator cuff</subject><subject>Shoulder</subject><subject>Systematic review</subject><issn>2077-0383</issn><issn>2077-0383</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2022</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><recordid>eNpdkc9q3DAQxkVpSUKaU-5F0EuhONUf25JLKSyhbQohgezmLGTtOPbWtjaSvGVveYg8SJ-hj5InqdzdhE100MwwPz6-j0HomJITzgvyaWE6SinneUpfoQNGhEgIl_z1Tr-PjrxfkPikTBkVe2ifZ5LkBRMHaDWrAV_ZFrCt8NnQgdMtvgDzK5nWugp40t_EXdPjK1iB84BnNkRiWtuhnYPDExdqZ5et9mH9GdMs-_sHj-Dg8Zf_08Pd_QRP1z5Ap0NjRp0Gfr9Fbyrdejja1kN0_f3b7PQsOb_88fN0cp6YmC4k89yUwDIhKppqHYfSEICU05SWMYuMgbhgsqSQZ0WWizJWJlMSv0LIecoP0deN7nIoO5gb6EMMqJau6bRbK6sb9XzTN7W6sStVsFwUtIgCH7YCzt4O4IPqGm-gbXUPdvCK5VJEB4SJiL5_gS7s4PoYb6RykkXDI_VxQxlnvXdQPZmhRI0nVTsnjfS7Xf9P7OMB-T-whZz1</recordid><startdate>20220623</startdate><enddate>20220623</enddate><creator>Longo, Umile Giuseppe</creator><creator>Gulotta, Lawrence V</creator><creator>De Salvatore, Sergio</creator><creator>Berton, Alessandra</creator><creator>Piergentili, Ilaria</creator><creator>Bandini, Benedetta</creator><creator>Lalli, Alberto</creator><creator>Denaro, Vincenzo</creator><general>MDPI AG</general><general>MDPI</general><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5909-3887</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9111-3638</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20220623</creationdate><title>The Role of Humeral Neck-Shaft Angle in Reverse Total Shoulder Arthroplasty: 155° versus &lt;155°—A Systematic Review</title><author>Longo, Umile Giuseppe ; Gulotta, Lawrence V ; De Salvatore, Sergio ; Berton, Alessandra ; Piergentili, Ilaria ; Bandini, Benedetta ; Lalli, Alberto ; Denaro, Vincenzo</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c339t-d6cbe2577f14aa6cbbc0ee43141b84288843728b1e659567be652840528978d43</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2022</creationdate><topic>Clinical medicine</topic><topic>Gender</topic><topic>Joint replacement surgery</topic><topic>Neck</topic><topic>Prostheses</topic><topic>Review</topic><topic>Rotator cuff</topic><topic>Shoulder</topic><topic>Systematic review</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Longo, Umile Giuseppe</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gulotta, Lawrence V</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>De Salvatore, Sergio</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Berton, Alessandra</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Piergentili, Ilaria</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bandini, Benedetta</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lalli, Alberto</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Denaro, Vincenzo</creatorcontrib><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Publicly Available Content Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>Journal of clinical medicine</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Longo, Umile Giuseppe</au><au>Gulotta, Lawrence V</au><au>De Salvatore, Sergio</au><au>Berton, Alessandra</au><au>Piergentili, Ilaria</au><au>Bandini, Benedetta</au><au>Lalli, Alberto</au><au>Denaro, Vincenzo</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>The Role of Humeral Neck-Shaft Angle in Reverse Total Shoulder Arthroplasty: 155° versus &lt;155°—A Systematic Review</atitle><jtitle>Journal of clinical medicine</jtitle><addtitle>J Clin Med</addtitle><date>2022-06-23</date><risdate>2022</risdate><volume>11</volume><issue>13</issue><spage>3641</spage><pages>3641-</pages><issn>2077-0383</issn><eissn>2077-0383</eissn><abstract>The aim of this study was to have updated scrutiny of the influence of the humeral neck-shaft angle (HNSA) in patients who underwent reverse shoulder arthroplasty (RSA). A PRISMA-guided literature search was conducted from May to September 2021. Clinical outcome scores, functional parameters, and any complications were reviewed. Eleven papers were identified for inclusion in this systematic review. A total of 971 shoulders were evaluated at a minimum-follow up of 12 months, and a maximum of 120 months. The sample size for the "HNSA 155°" group is 449 patients, the "HNSA 145°" group involves 140 patients, and the "HSNA 135°" group comprises 291 patients. The HNSA represents an important variable in choosing the RSA implant design for patients with rotator cuff arthropathy. Positive outcomes are described for all the 155°, 145°, and 135° HSNA groups. Among the different implant designs, the 155° group show a better SST score, but also the highest rate of revisions and scapular notching; the 145° cohort achieve the best values in terms of active forward flexion, abduction, ASES score, and CMS, but also the highest rate of infections; while the 135° design obtains the best results in the external rotation with arm at side, but also the highest rate of fractures. High-quality studies are required to obtain valid results regarding the best prosthesis implant.</abstract><cop>Switzerland</cop><pub>MDPI AG</pub><pmid>35806927</pmid><doi>10.3390/jcm11133641</doi><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5909-3887</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9111-3638</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 2077-0383
ispartof Journal of clinical medicine, 2022-06, Vol.11 (13), p.3641
issn 2077-0383
2077-0383
language eng
recordid cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_9267919
source PubMed Central Open Access; MDPI - Multidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute; EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals; PubMed Central
subjects Clinical medicine
Gender
Joint replacement surgery
Neck
Prostheses
Review
Rotator cuff
Shoulder
Systematic review
title The Role of Humeral Neck-Shaft Angle in Reverse Total Shoulder Arthroplasty: 155° versus <155°—A Systematic Review
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-13T11%3A59%3A05IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=The%20Role%20of%20Humeral%20Neck-Shaft%20Angle%20in%20Reverse%20Total%20Shoulder%20Arthroplasty:%20155%C2%B0%20versus%20%3C155%C2%B0%E2%80%94A%20Systematic%20Review&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20clinical%20medicine&rft.au=Longo,%20Umile%20Giuseppe&rft.date=2022-06-23&rft.volume=11&rft.issue=13&rft.spage=3641&rft.pages=3641-&rft.issn=2077-0383&rft.eissn=2077-0383&rft_id=info:doi/10.3390/jcm11133641&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E2687728027%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2686054287&rft_id=info:pmid/35806927&rfr_iscdi=true