Comparison of three culture media in assessing the sensitivity of antibiotics to common foodborne microorganisms
This study aimed to determine the antibiotic susceptibility of seven antibiotics, (Amoxicillin (AX), Ampicillin (AM), Chloramphenicol (C), Ciprofloxacin (CIP), Doxycycline (DO), Gentamicin (CN) and Neomycin (N)) on some common microorganisms that cause food poisoning. Furthermore, we aimed to compar...
Gespeichert in:
| Veröffentlicht in: | Journal of medicine and life 2022-05, Vol.15 (5), p.645-649 |
|---|---|
| Hauptverfasser: | , , , |
| Format: | Artikel |
| Sprache: | eng |
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
| Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
| container_end_page | 649 |
|---|---|
| container_issue | 5 |
| container_start_page | 645 |
| container_title | Journal of medicine and life |
| container_volume | 15 |
| creator | Mohammed, Sudad Jasim Al-Musawi, Adil Turki Al-Fraji, Aliaa Saadoon Kareem, Hayder Shannoon |
| description | This study aimed to determine the antibiotic susceptibility of seven antibiotics, (Amoxicillin (AX), Ampicillin (AM), Chloramphenicol (C), Ciprofloxacin (CIP), Doxycycline (DO), Gentamicin (CN) and Neomycin (N)) on some common microorganisms that cause food poisoning. Furthermore, we aimed to compare three types of culture media in assessing antibiotics susceptibility. A sensitivity test was carried out using six bacterial isolates:
Micrococcus spp
.,
Staphylococcus aureus, Escherichia coli, Salmonella spp
.,
Proteus mirabilis, Pseudomonas aeruginosa
. These bacterial isolates were identified at the Food Microbiology Division, Public Health Laboratory using three culture media: Mueller Hinton Agar (MHA), Antibiotic Assay Medium A (AAM), and nutrient agar (NA). The results showed that all of these media are suitable to test antibiotic sensitivity. Bacterial sensitivity and resistance between these media (P≤0.01) were recorded, with significant differences found at the tested probability level. |
| doi_str_mv | 10.25122/jml-2021-0404 |
| format | Article |
| fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_9262258</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2708410034</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3104-4dc4c04797bc3d1d4298cbe6f54ec47eb4140c963df570c9027ea1ae77c391313</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpdkU1r3DAQhkVJaUKaa8-CXnJxoi9b8iUQlqQtBHppoTchy-ONFlvaauRA_n21yRJodJkBPXrQzEvIF86uRMuFuN4tcyOY4A1TTH0gZ9wo1UjO9cmxr9CfU3KBuGP1qLbrOvmJnMrW8JYZeUb2m7TsXQ6YIk0TLY8ZgPp1LmsGusAYHA2ROkRADHFbAaAIEUMJT6E8H964WMIQUgkeaUnUp2WpsimlcUg5VkvwOaW8dTHggp_Jx8nNCBfHek5-39_92nxvHn5--7G5fWi85Ew1avTKM6V7PXg58lGJ3vgBuqlV4JWGQXHFfN_JcWp1bZjQ4LgDrb3sueTynNy8evfrUOfwEEt2s93nsLj8bJML9v-bGB7tNj3ZXnRCtKYKLo-CnP6ugMUuAT3Ms4uQVrSiM4b1rDdtRb--Q3dpzbGOZ4VmRnHGpKrU1StV14GYYXr7DGf2JU9b87SHPO0hT_kPo6CUVg</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2708410034</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Comparison of three culture media in assessing the sensitivity of antibiotics to common foodborne microorganisms</title><source>PubMed</source><source>EZB Electronic Journals Library</source><source>PubMed Central Open Access</source><creator>Mohammed, Sudad Jasim ; Al-Musawi, Adil Turki ; Al-Fraji, Aliaa Saadoon ; Kareem, Hayder Shannoon</creator><creatorcontrib>Mohammed, Sudad Jasim ; Al-Musawi, Adil Turki ; Al-Fraji, Aliaa Saadoon ; Kareem, Hayder Shannoon ; 1. Market Research and Consumer Protection Center, University of Baghdad, Baghdad, Iraq ; 2. Central Public Health Laboratory, Ministry of Health, Baghdad, Iraq ; Sudad Jasim Mohammed, Market Research and Consumer Protection Center, University of Baghdad, Baghdad, Iraq. E-mail: sudad@mracpc.uobaghdad.edu.iq</creatorcontrib><description>This study aimed to determine the antibiotic susceptibility of seven antibiotics, (Amoxicillin (AX), Ampicillin (AM), Chloramphenicol (C), Ciprofloxacin (CIP), Doxycycline (DO), Gentamicin (CN) and Neomycin (N)) on some common microorganisms that cause food poisoning. Furthermore, we aimed to compare three types of culture media in assessing antibiotics susceptibility. A sensitivity test was carried out using six bacterial isolates:
Micrococcus spp
.,
Staphylococcus aureus, Escherichia coli, Salmonella spp
.,
Proteus mirabilis, Pseudomonas aeruginosa
. These bacterial isolates were identified at the Food Microbiology Division, Public Health Laboratory using three culture media: Mueller Hinton Agar (MHA), Antibiotic Assay Medium A (AAM), and nutrient agar (NA). The results showed that all of these media are suitable to test antibiotic sensitivity. Bacterial sensitivity and resistance between these media (P≤0.01) were recorded, with significant differences found at the tested probability level.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1844-122X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1844-3117</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.25122/jml-2021-0404</identifier><identifier>PMID: 35815083</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Bucharest: Carol Daila University Foundation</publisher><subject>Antibiotics ; Bacteria ; Culture media ; E coli ; Food contamination & poisoning ; Foodborne pathogens ; Meat ; Medical laboratories ; Microorganisms ; Original ; Penicillin ; Public health ; Salmonella ; Staphylococcus infections ; Statistical analysis</subject><ispartof>Journal of medicine and life, 2022-05, Vol.15 (5), p.645-649</ispartof><rights>Copyright Carol Daila University Foundation May 2022</rights><rights>2022 JOURNAL of MEDICINE and LIFE 2022</rights><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3104-4dc4c04797bc3d1d4298cbe6f54ec47eb4140c963df570c9027ea1ae77c391313</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3104-4dc4c04797bc3d1d4298cbe6f54ec47eb4140c963df570c9027ea1ae77c391313</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9262258/pdf/$$EPDF$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9262258/$$EHTML$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,724,777,781,882,27905,27906,53772,53774</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Mohammed, Sudad Jasim</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Al-Musawi, Adil Turki</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Al-Fraji, Aliaa Saadoon</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kareem, Hayder Shannoon</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>1. Market Research and Consumer Protection Center, University of Baghdad, Baghdad, Iraq</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>2. Central Public Health Laboratory, Ministry of Health, Baghdad, Iraq</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sudad Jasim Mohammed, Market Research and Consumer Protection Center, University of Baghdad, Baghdad, Iraq. E-mail: sudad@mracpc.uobaghdad.edu.iq</creatorcontrib><title>Comparison of three culture media in assessing the sensitivity of antibiotics to common foodborne microorganisms</title><title>Journal of medicine and life</title><description>This study aimed to determine the antibiotic susceptibility of seven antibiotics, (Amoxicillin (AX), Ampicillin (AM), Chloramphenicol (C), Ciprofloxacin (CIP), Doxycycline (DO), Gentamicin (CN) and Neomycin (N)) on some common microorganisms that cause food poisoning. Furthermore, we aimed to compare three types of culture media in assessing antibiotics susceptibility. A sensitivity test was carried out using six bacterial isolates:
Micrococcus spp
.,
Staphylococcus aureus, Escherichia coli, Salmonella spp
.,
Proteus mirabilis, Pseudomonas aeruginosa
. These bacterial isolates were identified at the Food Microbiology Division, Public Health Laboratory using three culture media: Mueller Hinton Agar (MHA), Antibiotic Assay Medium A (AAM), and nutrient agar (NA). The results showed that all of these media are suitable to test antibiotic sensitivity. Bacterial sensitivity and resistance between these media (P≤0.01) were recorded, with significant differences found at the tested probability level.</description><subject>Antibiotics</subject><subject>Bacteria</subject><subject>Culture media</subject><subject>E coli</subject><subject>Food contamination & poisoning</subject><subject>Foodborne pathogens</subject><subject>Meat</subject><subject>Medical laboratories</subject><subject>Microorganisms</subject><subject>Original</subject><subject>Penicillin</subject><subject>Public health</subject><subject>Salmonella</subject><subject>Staphylococcus infections</subject><subject>Statistical analysis</subject><issn>1844-122X</issn><issn>1844-3117</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2022</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><recordid>eNpdkU1r3DAQhkVJaUKaa8-CXnJxoi9b8iUQlqQtBHppoTchy-ONFlvaauRA_n21yRJodJkBPXrQzEvIF86uRMuFuN4tcyOY4A1TTH0gZ9wo1UjO9cmxr9CfU3KBuGP1qLbrOvmJnMrW8JYZeUb2m7TsXQ6YIk0TLY8ZgPp1LmsGusAYHA2ROkRADHFbAaAIEUMJT6E8H964WMIQUgkeaUnUp2WpsimlcUg5VkvwOaW8dTHggp_Jx8nNCBfHek5-39_92nxvHn5--7G5fWi85Ew1avTKM6V7PXg58lGJ3vgBuqlV4JWGQXHFfN_JcWp1bZjQ4LgDrb3sueTynNy8evfrUOfwEEt2s93nsLj8bJML9v-bGB7tNj3ZXnRCtKYKLo-CnP6ugMUuAT3Ms4uQVrSiM4b1rDdtRb--Q3dpzbGOZ4VmRnHGpKrU1StV14GYYXr7DGf2JU9b87SHPO0hT_kPo6CUVg</recordid><startdate>20220501</startdate><enddate>20220501</enddate><creator>Mohammed, Sudad Jasim</creator><creator>Al-Musawi, Adil Turki</creator><creator>Al-Fraji, Aliaa Saadoon</creator><creator>Kareem, Hayder Shannoon</creator><general>Carol Daila University Foundation</general><general>Carol Davila University Press</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BBNVY</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>BYOGL</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>LK8</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M7P</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20220501</creationdate><title>Comparison of three culture media in assessing the sensitivity of antibiotics to common foodborne microorganisms</title><author>Mohammed, Sudad Jasim ; Al-Musawi, Adil Turki ; Al-Fraji, Aliaa Saadoon ; Kareem, Hayder Shannoon</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3104-4dc4c04797bc3d1d4298cbe6f54ec47eb4140c963df570c9027ea1ae77c391313</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2022</creationdate><topic>Antibiotics</topic><topic>Bacteria</topic><topic>Culture media</topic><topic>E coli</topic><topic>Food contamination & poisoning</topic><topic>Foodborne pathogens</topic><topic>Meat</topic><topic>Medical laboratories</topic><topic>Microorganisms</topic><topic>Original</topic><topic>Penicillin</topic><topic>Public health</topic><topic>Salmonella</topic><topic>Staphylococcus infections</topic><topic>Statistical analysis</topic><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Mohammed, Sudad Jasim</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Al-Musawi, Adil Turki</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Al-Fraji, Aliaa Saadoon</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kareem, Hayder Shannoon</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>1. Market Research and Consumer Protection Center, University of Baghdad, Baghdad, Iraq</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>2. Central Public Health Laboratory, Ministry of Health, Baghdad, Iraq</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sudad Jasim Mohammed, Market Research and Consumer Protection Center, University of Baghdad, Baghdad, Iraq. E-mail: sudad@mracpc.uobaghdad.edu.iq</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>East Europe, Central Europe Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>PML(ProQuest Medical Library)</collection><collection>ProQuest Biological Science Journals</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>Journal of medicine and life</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Mohammed, Sudad Jasim</au><au>Al-Musawi, Adil Turki</au><au>Al-Fraji, Aliaa Saadoon</au><au>Kareem, Hayder Shannoon</au><aucorp>1. Market Research and Consumer Protection Center, University of Baghdad, Baghdad, Iraq</aucorp><aucorp>2. Central Public Health Laboratory, Ministry of Health, Baghdad, Iraq</aucorp><aucorp>Sudad Jasim Mohammed, Market Research and Consumer Protection Center, University of Baghdad, Baghdad, Iraq. E-mail: sudad@mracpc.uobaghdad.edu.iq</aucorp><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Comparison of three culture media in assessing the sensitivity of antibiotics to common foodborne microorganisms</atitle><jtitle>Journal of medicine and life</jtitle><date>2022-05-01</date><risdate>2022</risdate><volume>15</volume><issue>5</issue><spage>645</spage><epage>649</epage><pages>645-649</pages><issn>1844-122X</issn><eissn>1844-3117</eissn><abstract>This study aimed to determine the antibiotic susceptibility of seven antibiotics, (Amoxicillin (AX), Ampicillin (AM), Chloramphenicol (C), Ciprofloxacin (CIP), Doxycycline (DO), Gentamicin (CN) and Neomycin (N)) on some common microorganisms that cause food poisoning. Furthermore, we aimed to compare three types of culture media in assessing antibiotics susceptibility. A sensitivity test was carried out using six bacterial isolates:
Micrococcus spp
.,
Staphylococcus aureus, Escherichia coli, Salmonella spp
.,
Proteus mirabilis, Pseudomonas aeruginosa
. These bacterial isolates were identified at the Food Microbiology Division, Public Health Laboratory using three culture media: Mueller Hinton Agar (MHA), Antibiotic Assay Medium A (AAM), and nutrient agar (NA). The results showed that all of these media are suitable to test antibiotic sensitivity. Bacterial sensitivity and resistance between these media (P≤0.01) were recorded, with significant differences found at the tested probability level.</abstract><cop>Bucharest</cop><pub>Carol Daila University Foundation</pub><pmid>35815083</pmid><doi>10.25122/jml-2021-0404</doi><tpages>5</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
| fulltext | fulltext |
| identifier | ISSN: 1844-122X |
| ispartof | Journal of medicine and life, 2022-05, Vol.15 (5), p.645-649 |
| issn | 1844-122X 1844-3117 |
| language | eng |
| recordid | cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_9262258 |
| source | PubMed; EZB Electronic Journals Library; PubMed Central Open Access |
| subjects | Antibiotics Bacteria Culture media E coli Food contamination & poisoning Foodborne pathogens Meat Medical laboratories Microorganisms Original Penicillin Public health Salmonella Staphylococcus infections Statistical analysis |
| title | Comparison of three culture media in assessing the sensitivity of antibiotics to common foodborne microorganisms |
| url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-17T18%3A21%3A20IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Comparison%20of%20three%20culture%20media%20in%20assessing%20the%20sensitivity%20of%20antibiotics%20to%20common%20foodborne%20microorganisms&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20medicine%20and%20life&rft.au=Mohammed,%20Sudad%20Jasim&rft.aucorp=1.%20Market%20Research%20and%20Consumer%20Protection%20Center,%20University%20of%20Baghdad,%20Baghdad,%20Iraq&rft.date=2022-05-01&rft.volume=15&rft.issue=5&rft.spage=645&rft.epage=649&rft.pages=645-649&rft.issn=1844-122X&rft.eissn=1844-3117&rft_id=info:doi/10.25122/jml-2021-0404&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E2708410034%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2708410034&rft_id=info:pmid/35815083&rfr_iscdi=true |