Artificial Intelligence Algorithm-Based MRI for Differentiation Diagnosis of Prostate Cancer

The rapid increase in prostate cancer (PCa) patients is similar to that of benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH) patients, but the treatments are quite different. In this research, magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) images under the weighted low-rank matrix restoration algorithm (RLRE) were utilized to d...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Computational and mathematical methods in medicine 2022-06, Vol.2022, p.1-10
Hauptverfasser: Luo, Rui, Zeng, Qingxiang, Chen, Huashan
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 10
container_issue
container_start_page 1
container_title Computational and mathematical methods in medicine
container_volume 2022
creator Luo, Rui
Zeng, Qingxiang
Chen, Huashan
description The rapid increase in prostate cancer (PCa) patients is similar to that of benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH) patients, but the treatments are quite different. In this research, magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) images under the weighted low-rank matrix restoration algorithm (RLRE) were utilized to differentiate PCa from BPH. The diagnostic effects of different sequences of MRI images were evaluated to provide a more effective examination method for the clinical differential diagnosis of PCa and BPH. 150 patients with suspected PCa were taken as the research objects. Pathological examination revealed that 137 patients had PCa and 13 patients had BPH. The pathological results were the gold standard and were compared with the MRI results of different sequences. Therefore, the accuracy of the MRI results was evaluated. The results showed that with the rise of Gaussian noise, the peak signal-to-noise ratio (PSNR) and structural similarity (SSIM) of all three algorithms gradually decreased, but the PSNR and SSIM of the RLRE algorithm were always higher than those of the RL and BM3D algorithms (P
doi_str_mv 10.1155/2022/8123643
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_9256308</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2687727447</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c327t-857f2fb9e851d2d6ec6ad759f0bb8df59b4f330899b800270f2446d737f890db3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kc1KAzEURoMoVqs7H2CWgo5NMpNJshFq_StUFFFwIYTMJGkj00lNUsW3N6Wl4MbVzSWHk3vzAXCC4AVChAwwxHjAEC6qstgBB4iWLK8oYrvbM3zrgcMQPiAkiBK0D3oFoZxXmB-A96GP1tjGyjYbd1G3rZ3qrtHZsJ06b-Nsnl_JoFX28DzOjPPZtTVGe91FK6N1XerltHPBhsyZ7Mm7EGXU2Ugmhz8Ce0a2QR9vah-83t68jO7zyePdeDSc5E2BacwZoQabmmtGkMKq0k0lFSXcwLpmyhBel6YoIOO8ZhBiCg0uy0rRghrGoaqLPrhcexfLeq5Vk6bzshULb-fS_wgnrfh709mZmLovwTGpkjgJTjcC7z6XOkQxt6FJnyE77ZZB4IpRimlZ0oSer9Em7Rq8NttnEBSrQMQqELEJJOFna3xmOyW_7f_0L1Z1ik8</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2687727447</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Artificial Intelligence Algorithm-Based MRI for Differentiation Diagnosis of Prostate Cancer</title><source>PubMed (Medline)</source><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><source>EZB Electronic Journals Library</source><source>PubMed Central Open Access</source><source>Wiley-Blackwell Open Access Titles(OpenAccess)</source><creator>Luo, Rui ; Zeng, Qingxiang ; Chen, Huashan</creator><contributor>Hussein, Ahmed Faeq</contributor><creatorcontrib>Luo, Rui ; Zeng, Qingxiang ; Chen, Huashan ; Hussein, Ahmed Faeq</creatorcontrib><description>The rapid increase in prostate cancer (PCa) patients is similar to that of benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH) patients, but the treatments are quite different. In this research, magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) images under the weighted low-rank matrix restoration algorithm (RLRE) were utilized to differentiate PCa from BPH. The diagnostic effects of different sequences of MRI images were evaluated to provide a more effective examination method for the clinical differential diagnosis of PCa and BPH. 150 patients with suspected PCa were taken as the research objects. Pathological examination revealed that 137 patients had PCa and 13 patients had BPH. The pathological results were the gold standard and were compared with the MRI results of different sequences. Therefore, the accuracy of the MRI results was evaluated. The results showed that with the rise of Gaussian noise, the peak signal-to-noise ratio (PSNR) and structural similarity (SSIM) of all three algorithms gradually decreased, but the PSNR and SSIM of the RLRE algorithm were always higher than those of the RL and BM3D algorithms (P&lt;0.05). The sensitivity (97.08%), specificity (92.31%), accuracy (96.67%), and consistency (0.678) of the dynamic contrast enhancement (DCE) sequence were higher than those of the plain scan (86.13%, 69.23%, 84.67%, and 0.469, respectively). In conclusion, the RLRE algorithm could promote the resolution of MRI images and improve the display effect. DCE could better differentiate PCa from BPH, had great clinical application value, and was worthy of clinical promotion.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1748-670X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1748-6718</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1155/2022/8123643</identifier><identifier>PMID: 35799629</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Hindawi</publisher><ispartof>Computational and mathematical methods in medicine, 2022-06, Vol.2022, p.1-10</ispartof><rights>Copyright © 2022 Rui Luo et al.</rights><rights>Copyright © 2022 Rui Luo et al. 2022</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c327t-857f2fb9e851d2d6ec6ad759f0bb8df59b4f330899b800270f2446d737f890db3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c327t-857f2fb9e851d2d6ec6ad759f0bb8df59b4f330899b800270f2446d737f890db3</cites><orcidid>0000-0003-4281-0565 ; 0000-0003-4516-8512 ; 0000-0002-2190-6536</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9256308/pdf/$$EPDF$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9256308/$$EHTML$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,724,777,781,882,27905,27906,53772,53774</link.rule.ids></links><search><contributor>Hussein, Ahmed Faeq</contributor><creatorcontrib>Luo, Rui</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zeng, Qingxiang</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chen, Huashan</creatorcontrib><title>Artificial Intelligence Algorithm-Based MRI for Differentiation Diagnosis of Prostate Cancer</title><title>Computational and mathematical methods in medicine</title><description>The rapid increase in prostate cancer (PCa) patients is similar to that of benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH) patients, but the treatments are quite different. In this research, magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) images under the weighted low-rank matrix restoration algorithm (RLRE) were utilized to differentiate PCa from BPH. The diagnostic effects of different sequences of MRI images were evaluated to provide a more effective examination method for the clinical differential diagnosis of PCa and BPH. 150 patients with suspected PCa were taken as the research objects. Pathological examination revealed that 137 patients had PCa and 13 patients had BPH. The pathological results were the gold standard and were compared with the MRI results of different sequences. Therefore, the accuracy of the MRI results was evaluated. The results showed that with the rise of Gaussian noise, the peak signal-to-noise ratio (PSNR) and structural similarity (SSIM) of all three algorithms gradually decreased, but the PSNR and SSIM of the RLRE algorithm were always higher than those of the RL and BM3D algorithms (P&lt;0.05). The sensitivity (97.08%), specificity (92.31%), accuracy (96.67%), and consistency (0.678) of the dynamic contrast enhancement (DCE) sequence were higher than those of the plain scan (86.13%, 69.23%, 84.67%, and 0.469, respectively). In conclusion, the RLRE algorithm could promote the resolution of MRI images and improve the display effect. DCE could better differentiate PCa from BPH, had great clinical application value, and was worthy of clinical promotion.</description><issn>1748-670X</issn><issn>1748-6718</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2022</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>RHX</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kc1KAzEURoMoVqs7H2CWgo5NMpNJshFq_StUFFFwIYTMJGkj00lNUsW3N6Wl4MbVzSWHk3vzAXCC4AVChAwwxHjAEC6qstgBB4iWLK8oYrvbM3zrgcMQPiAkiBK0D3oFoZxXmB-A96GP1tjGyjYbd1G3rZ3qrtHZsJ06b-Nsnl_JoFX28DzOjPPZtTVGe91FK6N1XerltHPBhsyZ7Mm7EGXU2Ugmhz8Ce0a2QR9vah-83t68jO7zyePdeDSc5E2BacwZoQabmmtGkMKq0k0lFSXcwLpmyhBel6YoIOO8ZhBiCg0uy0rRghrGoaqLPrhcexfLeq5Vk6bzshULb-fS_wgnrfh709mZmLovwTGpkjgJTjcC7z6XOkQxt6FJnyE77ZZB4IpRimlZ0oSer9Em7Rq8NttnEBSrQMQqELEJJOFna3xmOyW_7f_0L1Z1ik8</recordid><startdate>20220628</startdate><enddate>20220628</enddate><creator>Luo, Rui</creator><creator>Zeng, Qingxiang</creator><creator>Chen, Huashan</creator><general>Hindawi</general><scope>RHU</scope><scope>RHW</scope><scope>RHX</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4281-0565</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4516-8512</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2190-6536</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20220628</creationdate><title>Artificial Intelligence Algorithm-Based MRI for Differentiation Diagnosis of Prostate Cancer</title><author>Luo, Rui ; Zeng, Qingxiang ; Chen, Huashan</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c327t-857f2fb9e851d2d6ec6ad759f0bb8df59b4f330899b800270f2446d737f890db3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2022</creationdate><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Luo, Rui</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zeng, Qingxiang</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chen, Huashan</creatorcontrib><collection>Hindawi Publishing Complete</collection><collection>Hindawi Publishing Subscription Journals</collection><collection>Hindawi Publishing Open Access</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>Computational and mathematical methods in medicine</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Luo, Rui</au><au>Zeng, Qingxiang</au><au>Chen, Huashan</au><au>Hussein, Ahmed Faeq</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Artificial Intelligence Algorithm-Based MRI for Differentiation Diagnosis of Prostate Cancer</atitle><jtitle>Computational and mathematical methods in medicine</jtitle><date>2022-06-28</date><risdate>2022</risdate><volume>2022</volume><spage>1</spage><epage>10</epage><pages>1-10</pages><issn>1748-670X</issn><eissn>1748-6718</eissn><abstract>The rapid increase in prostate cancer (PCa) patients is similar to that of benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH) patients, but the treatments are quite different. In this research, magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) images under the weighted low-rank matrix restoration algorithm (RLRE) were utilized to differentiate PCa from BPH. The diagnostic effects of different sequences of MRI images were evaluated to provide a more effective examination method for the clinical differential diagnosis of PCa and BPH. 150 patients with suspected PCa were taken as the research objects. Pathological examination revealed that 137 patients had PCa and 13 patients had BPH. The pathological results were the gold standard and were compared with the MRI results of different sequences. Therefore, the accuracy of the MRI results was evaluated. The results showed that with the rise of Gaussian noise, the peak signal-to-noise ratio (PSNR) and structural similarity (SSIM) of all three algorithms gradually decreased, but the PSNR and SSIM of the RLRE algorithm were always higher than those of the RL and BM3D algorithms (P&lt;0.05). The sensitivity (97.08%), specificity (92.31%), accuracy (96.67%), and consistency (0.678) of the dynamic contrast enhancement (DCE) sequence were higher than those of the plain scan (86.13%, 69.23%, 84.67%, and 0.469, respectively). In conclusion, the RLRE algorithm could promote the resolution of MRI images and improve the display effect. DCE could better differentiate PCa from BPH, had great clinical application value, and was worthy of clinical promotion.</abstract><pub>Hindawi</pub><pmid>35799629</pmid><doi>10.1155/2022/8123643</doi><tpages>10</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4281-0565</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4516-8512</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2190-6536</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1748-670X
ispartof Computational and mathematical methods in medicine, 2022-06, Vol.2022, p.1-10
issn 1748-670X
1748-6718
language eng
recordid cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_9256308
source PubMed (Medline); Alma/SFX Local Collection; EZB Electronic Journals Library; PubMed Central Open Access; Wiley-Blackwell Open Access Titles(OpenAccess)
title Artificial Intelligence Algorithm-Based MRI for Differentiation Diagnosis of Prostate Cancer
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-17T15%3A48%3A25IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Artificial%20Intelligence%20Algorithm-Based%20MRI%20for%20Differentiation%20Diagnosis%20of%20Prostate%20Cancer&rft.jtitle=Computational%20and%20mathematical%20methods%20in%20medicine&rft.au=Luo,%20Rui&rft.date=2022-06-28&rft.volume=2022&rft.spage=1&rft.epage=10&rft.pages=1-10&rft.issn=1748-670X&rft.eissn=1748-6718&rft_id=info:doi/10.1155/2022/8123643&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E2687727447%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2687727447&rft_id=info:pmid/35799629&rfr_iscdi=true