Novel artificial intelligence system increases the detection of prostate cancer in whole slide images of core needle biopsies
Prostate cancer (PrCa) is the second most common cancer among men in the United States. The gold standard for detecting PrCa is the examination of prostate needle core biopsies. Diagnosis can be challenging, especially for small, well-differentiated cancers. Recently, machine learning algorithms hav...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Modern pathology 2020-10, Vol.33 (10), p.2058-2066 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 2066 |
---|---|
container_issue | 10 |
container_start_page | 2058 |
container_title | Modern pathology |
container_volume | 33 |
creator | Raciti, Patricia Sue, Jillian Ceballos, Rodrigo Godrich, Ran Kunz, Jeremy D. Kapur, Supriya Reuter, Victor Grady, Leo Kanan, Christopher Klimstra, David S. Fuchs, Thomas J. |
description | Prostate cancer (PrCa) is the second most common cancer among men in the United States. The gold standard for detecting PrCa is the examination of prostate needle core biopsies. Diagnosis can be challenging, especially for small, well-differentiated cancers. Recently, machine learning algorithms have been developed for detecting PrCa in whole slide images (WSIs) with high test accuracy. However, the impact of these artificial intelligence systems on pathologic diagnosis is not known. To address this, we investigated how pathologists interact with Paige Prostate Alpha, a state-of-the-art PrCa detection system, in WSIs of prostate needle core biopsies stained with hematoxylin and eosin. Three AP-board certified pathologists assessed 304 anonymized prostate needle core biopsy WSIs in 8 hours. The pathologists classified each WSI as benign or cancerous. After ~4 weeks, pathologists were tasked with re-reviewing each WSI with the aid of Paige Prostate Alpha. For each WSI, Paige Prostate Alpha was used to perform cancer detection and, for WSIs where cancer was detected, the system marked the area where cancer was detected with the highest probability. The original diagnosis for each slide was rendered by genitourinary pathologists and incorporated any ancillary studies requested during the original diagnostic assessment. Against this ground truth, the pathologists and Paige Prostate Alpha were measured. Without Paige Prostate Alpha, pathologists had an average sensitivity of 74% and an average specificity of 97%. With Paige Prostate Alpha, the average sensitivity for pathologists significantly increased to 90% with no statistically significant change in specificity. With Paige Prostate Alpha, pathologists more often correctly classified smaller, lower grade tumors, and spent less time analyzing each WSI. Future studies will investigate if similar benefit is yielded when such a system is used to detect other forms of cancer in a setting that more closely emulates real practice. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1038/s41379-020-0551-y |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_9235852</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2401806377</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c470t-e741878a73dc6dd0f89fadcc4e0c6a14515ca54e08c280095f81177019f382703</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kU9vEzEQxS0EoqHwAbggS1x6WRjb69i-IKGKAlLVXsrZcr2ziavNOthOUQ58d6ZKKX-knqzx_N7zjB9jrwW8E6Ds-9oLZVwHEjrQWnT7J2whtKJKWv2ULcA61Smn5RF7UesNgOi1lc_ZkZLKKbO0C_bzIt_ixENpaUwxhYmnueE0pRXOEXnd14YbuosFQ8XK2xr5gA1jS3nmeeTbkmsLDXkMJCiE8h_rPJF0SgPytAkrkhEYc0E-Iw7Uu055WxPWl-zZGKaKr-7PY_bt7NPV6Zfu_PLz19OP513sDbQOTS-sscGoIS6HAUbrxjDE2CPEZaClhI5BU2WjtABOj1YIY0C4UVlpQB2zDwff7e56g0PEuZUw-W2h8cre55D8v505rf0q33onlbZaksHJvUHJ33dYm9-kGumfwox5V73sQVhYKmMIffsfepN3Zab1iDK9s8YIRZQ4UJH-rxYcH4YR4O_C9YdwPYXr78L1e9K8-XuLB8XvNAmQB6BSa15h-fP0466_AHMvsn4</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2474987713</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Novel artificial intelligence system increases the detection of prostate cancer in whole slide images of core needle biopsies</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><source>EZB Electronic Journals Library</source><source>ProQuest Central</source><creator>Raciti, Patricia ; Sue, Jillian ; Ceballos, Rodrigo ; Godrich, Ran ; Kunz, Jeremy D. ; Kapur, Supriya ; Reuter, Victor ; Grady, Leo ; Kanan, Christopher ; Klimstra, David S. ; Fuchs, Thomas J.</creator><creatorcontrib>Raciti, Patricia ; Sue, Jillian ; Ceballos, Rodrigo ; Godrich, Ran ; Kunz, Jeremy D. ; Kapur, Supriya ; Reuter, Victor ; Grady, Leo ; Kanan, Christopher ; Klimstra, David S. ; Fuchs, Thomas J.</creatorcontrib><description>Prostate cancer (PrCa) is the second most common cancer among men in the United States. The gold standard for detecting PrCa is the examination of prostate needle core biopsies. Diagnosis can be challenging, especially for small, well-differentiated cancers. Recently, machine learning algorithms have been developed for detecting PrCa in whole slide images (WSIs) with high test accuracy. However, the impact of these artificial intelligence systems on pathologic diagnosis is not known. To address this, we investigated how pathologists interact with Paige Prostate Alpha, a state-of-the-art PrCa detection system, in WSIs of prostate needle core biopsies stained with hematoxylin and eosin. Three AP-board certified pathologists assessed 304 anonymized prostate needle core biopsy WSIs in 8 hours. The pathologists classified each WSI as benign or cancerous. After ~4 weeks, pathologists were tasked with re-reviewing each WSI with the aid of Paige Prostate Alpha. For each WSI, Paige Prostate Alpha was used to perform cancer detection and, for WSIs where cancer was detected, the system marked the area where cancer was detected with the highest probability. The original diagnosis for each slide was rendered by genitourinary pathologists and incorporated any ancillary studies requested during the original diagnostic assessment. Against this ground truth, the pathologists and Paige Prostate Alpha were measured. Without Paige Prostate Alpha, pathologists had an average sensitivity of 74% and an average specificity of 97%. With Paige Prostate Alpha, the average sensitivity for pathologists significantly increased to 90% with no statistically significant change in specificity. With Paige Prostate Alpha, pathologists more often correctly classified smaller, lower grade tumors, and spent less time analyzing each WSI. Future studies will investigate if similar benefit is yielded when such a system is used to detect other forms of cancer in a setting that more closely emulates real practice.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0893-3952</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1530-0285</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1038/s41379-020-0551-y</identifier><identifier>PMID: 32393768</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>New York: Nature Publishing Group US</publisher><subject>59 ; 631/67/589/466 ; 692/308 ; Artificial intelligence ; Biopsy ; Biopsy, Large-Core Needle ; Deep Learning ; Diagnosis ; Diagnosis, Computer-Assisted - methods ; Humans ; Image Interpretation, Computer-Assisted - methods ; Laboratory Medicine ; Learning algorithms ; Machine learning ; Male ; Medicine ; Medicine & Public Health ; Pathology ; Pathology, Clinical - methods ; Prostate cancer ; Prostatic Neoplasms - diagnosis ; Statistical analysis ; Tumors</subject><ispartof>Modern pathology, 2020-10, Vol.33 (10), p.2058-2066</ispartof><rights>The Author(s), under exclusive licence to United States & Canadian Academy of Pathology 2020</rights><rights>The Author(s), under exclusive licence to United States & Canadian Academy of Pathology 2020.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c470t-e741878a73dc6dd0f89fadcc4e0c6a14515ca54e08c280095f81177019f382703</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c470t-e741878a73dc6dd0f89fadcc4e0c6a14515ca54e08c280095f81177019f382703</cites><orcidid>0000-0001-5136-1955</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/2474987713?pq-origsite=primo$$EHTML$$P50$$Gproquest$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,777,781,882,27905,27906,64364,64366,64368,72218</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32393768$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Raciti, Patricia</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sue, Jillian</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ceballos, Rodrigo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Godrich, Ran</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kunz, Jeremy D.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kapur, Supriya</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Reuter, Victor</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Grady, Leo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kanan, Christopher</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Klimstra, David S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fuchs, Thomas J.</creatorcontrib><title>Novel artificial intelligence system increases the detection of prostate cancer in whole slide images of core needle biopsies</title><title>Modern pathology</title><addtitle>Mod Pathol</addtitle><addtitle>Mod Pathol</addtitle><description>Prostate cancer (PrCa) is the second most common cancer among men in the United States. The gold standard for detecting PrCa is the examination of prostate needle core biopsies. Diagnosis can be challenging, especially for small, well-differentiated cancers. Recently, machine learning algorithms have been developed for detecting PrCa in whole slide images (WSIs) with high test accuracy. However, the impact of these artificial intelligence systems on pathologic diagnosis is not known. To address this, we investigated how pathologists interact with Paige Prostate Alpha, a state-of-the-art PrCa detection system, in WSIs of prostate needle core biopsies stained with hematoxylin and eosin. Three AP-board certified pathologists assessed 304 anonymized prostate needle core biopsy WSIs in 8 hours. The pathologists classified each WSI as benign or cancerous. After ~4 weeks, pathologists were tasked with re-reviewing each WSI with the aid of Paige Prostate Alpha. For each WSI, Paige Prostate Alpha was used to perform cancer detection and, for WSIs where cancer was detected, the system marked the area where cancer was detected with the highest probability. The original diagnosis for each slide was rendered by genitourinary pathologists and incorporated any ancillary studies requested during the original diagnostic assessment. Against this ground truth, the pathologists and Paige Prostate Alpha were measured. Without Paige Prostate Alpha, pathologists had an average sensitivity of 74% and an average specificity of 97%. With Paige Prostate Alpha, the average sensitivity for pathologists significantly increased to 90% with no statistically significant change in specificity. With Paige Prostate Alpha, pathologists more often correctly classified smaller, lower grade tumors, and spent less time analyzing each WSI. Future studies will investigate if similar benefit is yielded when such a system is used to detect other forms of cancer in a setting that more closely emulates real practice.</description><subject>59</subject><subject>631/67/589/466</subject><subject>692/308</subject><subject>Artificial intelligence</subject><subject>Biopsy</subject><subject>Biopsy, Large-Core Needle</subject><subject>Deep Learning</subject><subject>Diagnosis</subject><subject>Diagnosis, Computer-Assisted - methods</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Image Interpretation, Computer-Assisted - methods</subject><subject>Laboratory Medicine</subject><subject>Learning algorithms</subject><subject>Machine learning</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Medicine</subject><subject>Medicine & Public Health</subject><subject>Pathology</subject><subject>Pathology, Clinical - methods</subject><subject>Prostate cancer</subject><subject>Prostatic Neoplasms - diagnosis</subject><subject>Statistical analysis</subject><subject>Tumors</subject><issn>0893-3952</issn><issn>1530-0285</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2020</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><recordid>eNp1kU9vEzEQxS0EoqHwAbggS1x6WRjb69i-IKGKAlLVXsrZcr2ziavNOthOUQ58d6ZKKX-knqzx_N7zjB9jrwW8E6Ds-9oLZVwHEjrQWnT7J2whtKJKWv2ULcA61Smn5RF7UesNgOi1lc_ZkZLKKbO0C_bzIt_ixENpaUwxhYmnueE0pRXOEXnd14YbuosFQ8XK2xr5gA1jS3nmeeTbkmsLDXkMJCiE8h_rPJF0SgPytAkrkhEYc0E-Iw7Uu055WxPWl-zZGKaKr-7PY_bt7NPV6Zfu_PLz19OP513sDbQOTS-sscGoIS6HAUbrxjDE2CPEZaClhI5BU2WjtABOj1YIY0C4UVlpQB2zDwff7e56g0PEuZUw-W2h8cre55D8v505rf0q33onlbZaksHJvUHJ33dYm9-kGumfwox5V73sQVhYKmMIffsfepN3Zab1iDK9s8YIRZQ4UJH-rxYcH4YR4O_C9YdwPYXr78L1e9K8-XuLB8XvNAmQB6BSa15h-fP0466_AHMvsn4</recordid><startdate>20201001</startdate><enddate>20201001</enddate><creator>Raciti, Patricia</creator><creator>Sue, Jillian</creator><creator>Ceballos, Rodrigo</creator><creator>Godrich, Ran</creator><creator>Kunz, Jeremy D.</creator><creator>Kapur, Supriya</creator><creator>Reuter, Victor</creator><creator>Grady, Leo</creator><creator>Kanan, Christopher</creator><creator>Klimstra, David S.</creator><creator>Fuchs, Thomas J.</creator><general>Nature Publishing Group US</general><general>Elsevier Limited</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7QP</scope><scope>7RV</scope><scope>7TK</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88A</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BBNVY</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>KB0</scope><scope>LK8</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M7P</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5136-1955</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20201001</creationdate><title>Novel artificial intelligence system increases the detection of prostate cancer in whole slide images of core needle biopsies</title><author>Raciti, Patricia ; Sue, Jillian ; Ceballos, Rodrigo ; Godrich, Ran ; Kunz, Jeremy D. ; Kapur, Supriya ; Reuter, Victor ; Grady, Leo ; Kanan, Christopher ; Klimstra, David S. ; Fuchs, Thomas J.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c470t-e741878a73dc6dd0f89fadcc4e0c6a14515ca54e08c280095f81177019f382703</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2020</creationdate><topic>59</topic><topic>631/67/589/466</topic><topic>692/308</topic><topic>Artificial intelligence</topic><topic>Biopsy</topic><topic>Biopsy, Large-Core Needle</topic><topic>Deep Learning</topic><topic>Diagnosis</topic><topic>Diagnosis, Computer-Assisted - methods</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Image Interpretation, Computer-Assisted - methods</topic><topic>Laboratory Medicine</topic><topic>Learning algorithms</topic><topic>Machine learning</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Medicine</topic><topic>Medicine & Public Health</topic><topic>Pathology</topic><topic>Pathology, Clinical - methods</topic><topic>Prostate cancer</topic><topic>Prostatic Neoplasms - diagnosis</topic><topic>Statistical analysis</topic><topic>Tumors</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Raciti, Patricia</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sue, Jillian</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ceballos, Rodrigo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Godrich, Ran</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kunz, Jeremy D.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kapur, Supriya</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Reuter, Victor</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Grady, Leo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kanan, Christopher</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Klimstra, David S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fuchs, Thomas J.</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Calcium & Calcified Tissue Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest Nursing and Allied Health Journals</collection><collection>Neurosciences Abstracts</collection><collection>Health Medical collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Biology Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Biological Science Journals</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>Modern pathology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Raciti, Patricia</au><au>Sue, Jillian</au><au>Ceballos, Rodrigo</au><au>Godrich, Ran</au><au>Kunz, Jeremy D.</au><au>Kapur, Supriya</au><au>Reuter, Victor</au><au>Grady, Leo</au><au>Kanan, Christopher</au><au>Klimstra, David S.</au><au>Fuchs, Thomas J.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Novel artificial intelligence system increases the detection of prostate cancer in whole slide images of core needle biopsies</atitle><jtitle>Modern pathology</jtitle><stitle>Mod Pathol</stitle><addtitle>Mod Pathol</addtitle><date>2020-10-01</date><risdate>2020</risdate><volume>33</volume><issue>10</issue><spage>2058</spage><epage>2066</epage><pages>2058-2066</pages><issn>0893-3952</issn><eissn>1530-0285</eissn><abstract>Prostate cancer (PrCa) is the second most common cancer among men in the United States. The gold standard for detecting PrCa is the examination of prostate needle core biopsies. Diagnosis can be challenging, especially for small, well-differentiated cancers. Recently, machine learning algorithms have been developed for detecting PrCa in whole slide images (WSIs) with high test accuracy. However, the impact of these artificial intelligence systems on pathologic diagnosis is not known. To address this, we investigated how pathologists interact with Paige Prostate Alpha, a state-of-the-art PrCa detection system, in WSIs of prostate needle core biopsies stained with hematoxylin and eosin. Three AP-board certified pathologists assessed 304 anonymized prostate needle core biopsy WSIs in 8 hours. The pathologists classified each WSI as benign or cancerous. After ~4 weeks, pathologists were tasked with re-reviewing each WSI with the aid of Paige Prostate Alpha. For each WSI, Paige Prostate Alpha was used to perform cancer detection and, for WSIs where cancer was detected, the system marked the area where cancer was detected with the highest probability. The original diagnosis for each slide was rendered by genitourinary pathologists and incorporated any ancillary studies requested during the original diagnostic assessment. Against this ground truth, the pathologists and Paige Prostate Alpha were measured. Without Paige Prostate Alpha, pathologists had an average sensitivity of 74% and an average specificity of 97%. With Paige Prostate Alpha, the average sensitivity for pathologists significantly increased to 90% with no statistically significant change in specificity. With Paige Prostate Alpha, pathologists more often correctly classified smaller, lower grade tumors, and spent less time analyzing each WSI. Future studies will investigate if similar benefit is yielded when such a system is used to detect other forms of cancer in a setting that more closely emulates real practice.</abstract><cop>New York</cop><pub>Nature Publishing Group US</pub><pmid>32393768</pmid><doi>10.1038/s41379-020-0551-y</doi><tpages>9</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5136-1955</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0893-3952 |
ispartof | Modern pathology, 2020-10, Vol.33 (10), p.2058-2066 |
issn | 0893-3952 1530-0285 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_9235852 |
source | MEDLINE; Alma/SFX Local Collection; EZB Electronic Journals Library; ProQuest Central |
subjects | 59 631/67/589/466 692/308 Artificial intelligence Biopsy Biopsy, Large-Core Needle Deep Learning Diagnosis Diagnosis, Computer-Assisted - methods Humans Image Interpretation, Computer-Assisted - methods Laboratory Medicine Learning algorithms Machine learning Male Medicine Medicine & Public Health Pathology Pathology, Clinical - methods Prostate cancer Prostatic Neoplasms - diagnosis Statistical analysis Tumors |
title | Novel artificial intelligence system increases the detection of prostate cancer in whole slide images of core needle biopsies |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-17T18%3A23%3A50IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Novel%20artificial%20intelligence%20system%20increases%20the%20detection%20of%20prostate%20cancer%20in%20whole%20slide%20images%20of%20core%20needle%20biopsies&rft.jtitle=Modern%20pathology&rft.au=Raciti,%20Patricia&rft.date=2020-10-01&rft.volume=33&rft.issue=10&rft.spage=2058&rft.epage=2066&rft.pages=2058-2066&rft.issn=0893-3952&rft.eissn=1530-0285&rft_id=info:doi/10.1038/s41379-020-0551-y&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E2401806377%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2474987713&rft_id=info:pmid/32393768&rfr_iscdi=true |